13
SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17 , 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design Ron Sanchez

SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17 , 63-

76

PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE

Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in

Product and Organization Design

Ron

San

chez

Page 2: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Overview

Applies principles of “nearly decomposable systems” (Simon, 1962)

Examines the interrelationships between: 1. product design,2. organizational design, 3. processes for learning and managing

knowledge, and4. competitive strategy

Page 3: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Core Conclusions

Creation of modular product architectures creates flexible product designs… …enables “loosely coupled, flexible, ‘modular’

organization structures” (p. 73)… …facilitates the creation of embedded coordination due

to fully specified and standardized component interfaces (part of the modular product design)… …reduces the need for overt exercise of managerial

authority across the interfaces…• …reduces the intensity and complexity of a firm’s

managerial task in product development…• …and gives greater flexibility to take on larger

numbers/greater variety of product creation projects

Page 4: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Terminology & Core Concepts

Modularity: “a special form of design which intentionally creates a high degree of independence or ‘loose coupling’ between component designs by standardizing component interface specifications” (p. 65)

Complex systems consist of parts that interact and are interdependent The interrelated parts create subsystems, but the

interactions among subsystems (in a nearly decomposable system) are weak (Simon, 1962) This decomposing of structure can enable more

adaptable designs for creating products

Page 5: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Modularity in Product & Organization Designs

Designs can vary in the degree to which they are decomposed (i.e., tightly or loosely coupled)

This degree depends on the extent to which the change in the design of one component changes other components. Is there a high degree of interdependence or

are the components independent? Modularity create independence through

standardized component interface specifications

Page 6: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Modular Product Designs

Components make up the products relationships between components are defined by

specifications of inputs and outputs to link the components these interfaces are specified in a product design the complete set of component interface specifications

= product architectureTightly coupled designs require intensive

managerial coordinationOn the other hand, specifying standardized

component interfaces permit for effective coordination without continual exercise of managerial authority

Page 7: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Standardized Component Interfaces

Provides an information structure that coordinates loosely coupled activities with component developers (Radner, 1992)

Modular product architecture use these standardized interfaces to create flexible product architectures. Allows for variations in components, substitutions,

and strategic flexibility (Sanchez, 1995) Facilitates continuous change (Spender & Grinyer,

1995)

Page 8: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Modular Organization Design

The information structure provided in the modular product architecture provides a means to embed coordination of loosely coupled component development processes (p. 66) Allows for “modular organizations” that continuously

change and solve problems via interconnected coordinated self-organizing processes

Creates “resource chains” to link resources and capabilities throughout the organization to respond quickly and broadly with lower costs (p. 68)

Page 9: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Managing Knowledge & Learning

If modularization is to work, firms need a high level of “architectural knowledge” (Sanchez, 1996; Wright, 1994) Need to know how the components function and interact in

a product Narrow, specific knowledge is not sufficient

To successfully innovate and have effective and efficient product development, need to consider how knowledge is created and information is transferred “Traditional” sequential development Overlapping problem solving Modular product development

Page 10: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Models for Managing Knowledge & Learning (page 71)

1. Traditional Sequential Development Processes Define product conceptsequence design and development

tastsprioritize greatest needs for knowledge (repeat) Results in information losses, slow progress,

incompatibilities between components, etc. Requires tight structure and managerial oversight

2. Overlapping Problem Solving Staggered sequential development Greater sharing of information and less information loss

3. Modular Product Development Create a complete information structure with defined

outputs and fully specified component interfaces REQUIRES ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE!!!

Page 11: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Modular Product Design Process Advantages

This process allows learning at the component level to be “insulated” from disruptions (p.70)

Because interfaces are specified, component-level learning processes can be concurrently and autonomously carried out by loosely coupled groups Firms may be able to combine capabilities more readily

with their extensive network of component developers Firms may be able to increase the absorptive capacity of

the firm (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990) Firms have potential for combinative capabilities of the

firm’s current architectural knowledge (Bartlett, 1993; Kogut & Zander, 1992)

Page 12: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Modular Product Design Process (Cont’d)

Decoupling architectural (broad) and component (specific) levels of learning allows firms to effectively exploit stocks of knowledge (March, 1991)

Process permits for “mixing and matching” modular components to leverage product variations

Enables firms to learn about markets, leverage variations quickly and at reduced costs

Page 13: SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, 63-76 PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management

Conclusion

Extends the principle of decompositionTrends to create modular product architectures not

only creates flexible/modular product designs also supports flexible/modular organization designs

This requires and supports embedded coordination that fully specified standardized component interfaces The results is a reduced need for overt exercise of

managerial authority and greater strategic flexibility.Standardizing interfaces in modular system

architectures is a design option for achieving increased flexibility, inter-organizational coordination, and flatter organizations.