Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
S.A.M.P.L.E . S mall A rea M ethods for P overty and L iving condition E stimates. Brussels, 24 february 2011. Research for evidence policy-making: the role of a Public Administration in Sample project. Michela Casarosa, Province of Pisa. The province of Pisa. TUSCANY REGION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EU – FP7 - SSH-2007-1Grant Agreement no 217565
1
S.A.M.P.L.E.Small Area Methods for
Poverty and Living condition Estimates
Brussels, 24 february 2011
Michela Casarosa, Province of Pisa
Research for evidence policy-making: the role of a Public Administration in Sample project
The province of Pisa
TUSCANY REGION
39 MUNICIPALITIES (LAU2)
PROVINCE OF PISA (LAU1)
2 Provincial Offices involved in Sample Project The Provincial Social Observatory The European Policies and International Affairs Office
5 HEALTH’S SOCIETIES
The Provincial Social Observatory
Annual Social Statistical BASE (data on demography, families, housing, justice, social assistance, third sector)Local SURVEY (gender violence, young people, immigrants, security)
INVOLVEMENT of local Public Administration and third sector organisations
NETWORK of 10 Provincial Observatories (health’s profile indicators)
MONITORING SOCIAL
PHENOMENA
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
REGIONAL NETWORK
Why Sample Project…
The lackness of poverty data at small area
The need to compare our experience at european level
The increasing relevance of poverty in our public social expenditure
10,7
17,320,6
16,9
0,62,1
54,2
44,3
3,6 3,25,0
12,3
5,3 4,0
-
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
Family andminors
Disability Dependences Elders Immigrants Poverty andadults
discomfort
Other users
Composition of Social Expenditure (2007, 2009)
2007
2009
The value added of a Public Administration in a research project
A better finalization of the research to the NEEDS of POLICYMAKERS
The knowledge of the TERRITORY
The contact with local public and third sector ORGANIZATIONS
The possibility to have access to administrative DATABASES
Our main findings
Acquisition of administrative and third sector DATABASES
Selection of poverty INDICATORS
more relevant for policy planning
The construction of the
Provincial Social OBSERVATORY
•Caritas database•Job center’s database•Revenue Agency database
•Indicators of Tuscany Region•Stakeholders Indicators
•Agreement with Caritas•Network of 252 stakeholders
Regional Indicators
First list of 300 indicators
Meeting with referents of Health’s Societies
Last list of 250 indicators
INDICATORS FOR HEALTH’S PROFILE
1. Demographic profile
2. Health’s determinants
3. Health state
4. Essential levels of sanitary
assistance
6. Social and sanitary assistance
2 objectivs:policies planning (health’s profile ex ante) policies evaluation (health’s profile ex post)
Some examples from regional indicators
1) DEMOGRAPHY – Indicators about: age structure, population composition
5) SOCIAL AND SANITARY ASSISTANCE – Indicators about: social expenditure distribution, assistance to persons in social distress
4) ESSENTIAL LEVEL OF SANITARY ASSISTANCE – Indicators about: hospitalization, medical screening
2) HEALTH’S DETERMINANTS – Indicators about: revenue, employment, lifestyle, ambient
3) HEALTH STATE – Indicators about: mortality (per age, typology, etc.), iIlness
Indicators proposals by stakeholders
An important aim of Sample project: to achieve the POINT OF VIEW of local stakeholders on the relevance of indicators
The instrument: a SURVEY
The list of stakeholders: selection of 690 organizations
The RESPONDENTS: 252 stakeholders
The questions
10
Local stakeholders
Do they judge indicators relevant
for policies planning?
Do they judge indicators relevant for
their activity?
Do they know Laeken
indicators?
Do they know EU-SILC indicators?
•Public Administrations (37,2%)•Associations (42,2%)•Parishes and Caritas Counselling Centers (10,3%)•Social Cooperatives (9,3%)
Quickly…other aims of the survey
1) Achieving stakeholders’ PERCEPTION of poverty level in their territory
2) Knowing stakeholders’ INFORMATION SYSTEM
3) Knowing their interest and their OPINION about: The construction of a POVERTY OBSERVATORY The Creation of a WEB PORTAL The usefulness of activities for the
EMPOWERMENT of stakeholders NETWORK (meeting, training, etc)
Results: relevance of indicators
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Level ofunemployment
Income inequality Hardship housing Quality of housing Income School drop-out State of health
Ind
ex
Results: proposal of new indicatorsIndicatore VA %
Debt 65 35,9Quality of food 27 14,9Quality of housing 15 8,3Capability to access to services 12 6,6Social network 12 6,6Family hardship 8 4,4Lifestyles 8 4,4I llegal work 5 2,8Instruction-Education 5 2,8Unemployment 4 2,2Not Self Sufficiency 4 2,2Dependences 5 2,8Income 3 1,7State of health 3 1,7Crisis of value system 2 1,1Gender (female) or status (immigrants) 3 1,7Total 181 100
Results: opinion about proposals
5,5 94,4
13,5 84,8
13,3 85,5
10,2 89,1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Observation System tomonitor poverty,
vulnerability and socialexclusion
Portal web
Strenghten ofstakeholders network
Strenghten of counsellingcenters and front offices
Opinion about the usefulness of some instrumentsNot useful
Not veryusefulUseful
Toward a knowledge-based planning
Data and indicators
Sample Software
A simple visualization of data and indicators
useful for planning
Free distribution to other Public Administration
Our involvement in the building of the software
