Salvador Alejo Reta, A060 663 553 (BIA Jan. 15, 2014)

8/13/2019 Salvador Alejo Reta, A060 663 553 (BIA Jan. 15, 2014)

1/15

Caudilo, Daniel, EsquireThe Law Office of Dae adilo5959 Gateway West Site 460El Paso TX 79925

Name: AEJO RETA, SALVADOR

U.S mn of Ji

Executive Oce r Imigraion Review

Board of Immigation AppealsOce o he Clek

5107 leburg Pke, Sit 2000Fas Chc Vgn 20530

HS/IC Oie o hie Consel - ELP155 awkns Bv.l Paso TX 79925

A 060663553

Date o this otice: 1/15/2014

closed is a copy of he Boad's decision ad orde i he above-erenced case.

cose

P b:Malphrus, Ga D

Scerly,

D ctDoa Ca

Chf Clrk

d Dcket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Salvador Alejo Reta, A060 663 553 (BIA Jan. 15, 2014)


2/15

AJO RTA SALVADORA060-663-553E PASO SPC8915 MOAA AVEE PASO TX 79925

Name: AJO RTA, SAVADOR

Execuve Oce r Igraon Revew

Bord ofImmigrtion ppelsOce of the Clerk

507 ebug Pike Sute 000Fs Clmrc Vgin 050

HS/IC Oce o Che Counsel EP154 awkis Bvd. Paso X 79925

A 06066353

ate of this notice 1/1/2014

Enclosed s a copy of he Board's decsion n he above-reenced case. Ths copy s engpovde to yo as a courtesy Your aoey or epresenave has been serve wh hsecson prsuan o FR 9.Sa I he atached decso orders ha you beremoved om the Unted Saes or ams an mgaton Jdges decson orderng a yoube removed, any eon r evew of he atached decson s ed w an ecevedy he approprae cour of apeas wihn ays o he dae o he decson

ncosure

P bM, G

Sincerey

D cDonna Carhef erk

d: k



3/15

U.S Departmet of Jusce.Executive Oce r Immigation Rviw

Deiso of he Boad o mmgao Appls

Fas Chch, Vgiia

Fie A060 66 E Paso, TX

In re SALVADOR AEJO RETA

MOVAL PROCEEDNGS

APPEA

Date:

ON BEALF OF RESPONDENT De Caudilo, Esqre

ON BEHALF OF DS:

CARGE

Eas GasteoChef Counse

Notce Sec. 212(a)(2)(C), &N Act [8 U.C 1182(a)(2)(C)] -Controle sstace tracker

APPLICATION Termiation

JAN 5 204

Te responent, a natve an ctze of Meico ad a lafu peaent residet of the UnitedStates, appeas te decsion of the migration Jge, date Agst 1, 201, wch denied hismoton to sppress evence an is otion to terminate, a u hi removable as chargedThe appeal wil be ismissed

We reve r clear error the nigs of ct, ncln te eteraton of creiity,mae by the Immiatio Jge 8 C.FR 100(d)()(i). We review de nov a other isses,incing whether the parties have met the reevat bren of proof, a sses of iscretion8 CFR. 00. (d)()(i)

On April 2, 2012, the responent was encoutered at te borer by Cstoms an Borderatro (CBP" ocers, atemptn to enter the Unted States om Meico y veice (J at 2Eh 2) Uo rimay an rotine nspectio, te respondents beavor d hs responses toestong ed CBP Ocer Quntaar to decde that the respodent shod e rerred tosecodary nspection J at 2 Tr at 89-10 E ) The responent gave a smilar verba

statement to CBP Ocer Avtia ring the seconary nspection ( J at 2 E ) As a rest,Ofcer Avtia reqeste caine specton of te responets car, ad almost 6 ponds ofauaa as utte e ca . a - r a 0; Exh 3 Mele, eesponent as etained and interroate y Seca Aets om te Homead Secrtynvestigations breau (HS"). A topage statement in Spaish, poey en by herespondent was proce om that interroation J at Eh

Te Deparmet of Homend Secui (HS") le a criin complant aainst terespondent n United States Distct Cort, charin h with possession of a conoedsbstance wth itent to stribte, a portation of a controle sbstace (J at - Eh )Te co, however, ranted te respodents oton to sppress a statemets, rte d



4/15

A060 66

veba that he made ae being ee to secondary inspection at 4; Exh 4). The coutconclded at te espondent di not sucienty compehend e Engish anguage to havemade eey a wave o his ights in Engish an thee was no poo that he eceived he popewings in Spanis

Te cmina compaint w dismissed nd te DHS issued a Notice to Appe chging theespondent wit emoval as n ariving aien whom he DHS has eason to beieve" is o was anilici rake in a conoled substance J at Exh ) ee section 22a)2)C) o the Act8 USC l 82a)2)C) Both CBP Oces Avitia an uintanar testie at the hearing eespondent invoked his Fih Amenmen igh not to testi aguing tat snce the ciminalcompaint was dsmissed without pejdice ny testimony could sti be used against him Tat 78-79) He aso moved to suppess the statement he mae to the HS oces base on theistc cous ruling Finaly he gued that e ha consstently ened hs knowedge o themarjuana in he ca; theee te DHS did not meet its ben o pove that he ha he eqisiteknowedge to concude that he w a g tacke T at 77-78)

The Immigation uge ued hat even assuming the espondent had made a pima cieshowing that e evidence ha been ilegay obtaned the ure to povie the pope waingsin Spanish was not the pe o egegious conuct to warnt suppession o the evience in theemoval context a 4) Theee he denied the motion to suppess He uhe oncethat the espondents inconsistent statements o e CBP an HS oces withot testiony toexplan the inconsistencies was suient evidence to in that he new that he was tanspoingcontaban at 7-8) Thus he miatio Jge sustained e chage o emova heespondent id not e any applications eie

On apea te espondent ages hat he mmigaion udge eed n denying his motion tosuppess evidence obtained by te HS agents noting hat the ien statement was not signed

o autenticated by im Responents B at 2-) He also contens that the ImmgationJuge impopey dew negative inences om his esal to testi Responent's Bat 0-) Finy he espondent argues ha the Immigaton Judge appied he wong ctosnd di not ely on easonabe sbstantia an pobative evience to etermine tha he was aknowng tacke in a contoled substnce Respondent's B at 9-22)

We adess these contentions in u We am he Imation Judges denia o themotion to suppess Te excsionry ule does not appy n imgration poceedingsGenealy ocumentary evience in emoval poceedings need not compot wit the strict

juicia ues o evidence ate in oe to be admissible sh evidence need ony be probativend its use nmentay Maer of easuez 9 I&N Dec 77 8 BIA 986) Ony

egregious violation o the aiens ights nde the Fourh Aenment to the Constitution o theUnited Sates o oe ibeties tat migt tansgess he notions o ndamental iess onemne te pobate vue o e evece w e sppeson i a civi immationpoceeing ee geeraly IN Lopzndoz, 68 US 551 98) A aienseekg the excsion o evidence based on an egegios violation o the Fort Amenmenbears the burden o estabishing a prima cie case that evidence shoud be suppesse eeMaer ofag &N Dec 69 IA 97)



5/15

A060 663 3

Te respondents argment at te statements to te HS ofcers sould be suppressed rte same reasons given by te court ie, tat e was not advised of is rigts in Spis -- iswitout merit in te contet of remova roceedings (.J at S INS Lop-no spr,at 1039 (te absence of Miranda wings does not render a otherwise volnta statement byte respondent inadmissible in a depoation case s o Bstorr NS, 898 F2d 103,1067 (t Cir 1990 (rling tat te DS Form 213 was propely admited because it wasclearly reeva d material d . not repetitios, despite an imigration ofcers ilure togive a iradalke waning As te resondent oered no evidence tat te statements wereobtained by coercion, duress, or improper action, e did not demonstate tat its admissionwould be an egregious Four Amendment violation

Te respondent contends tat te written statement is ueliabe because it is unautenticatedand nsubstantiated (Respondents Br at 12, 21 While te resondent resed to admit at teeing tat e ote te statement (Tr at 19, te rm and context of te statement spports anding tat it was made duing te course of te investigation Te statement is in Spanis onan SI , dated on te same day as te respondents referra to SI inteogation (Ex 3Moreover, in disict court te respondent did not contest te autenticity or veracity of testatement, only tat e did not voltarily waie is rigts bere he wrote it (Ex ) Tus, wearm te Immigration udge's consideration of te statement in sustaining te cage ofremova. S r of Vsq pr

An aien may rese to answer qestions at a removal earing by aking a claim of selfincrimination under te i Amendment, if te answer may reasonably ave a tendency toincriminate im o is proof of a link in te cain of evidence necessa to convict im of acrime. tr of R-, 4 &N Dec 720 (BIA 192 Howeve, advese inference ay be drawnom te aliens silence in removal proceedings. r of Gvr, 20 I&N Dec. 238(BIA 1991 S so g Gtirr Hor, 662 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9 Cir 2011 Wedisaee wit te respondent tat e Immigraton Judge improperly drew negative inferencesom te respondent's resa to testi prior to te establisment of a ria cie case ofremova (Respondents Br at 12 S id (te alen's silence alone, in te absence of any oterevidence of record, is insufcient to constitute rima cie evidence of is removability Terespondent acknowledges tat, rior to consideration of is itten satement, te mmigrationudge considered te testimony of te two CBP ofcers and te amont of mijua nd inte veicle driven by te respondent, wic constituted prima cie evidence at e was a drugtracker (Respondents Br at 12. Te igration Juge sed te writen statement to ndtat te DHS roved, clearly and convincingly tat te respondent was a knowng particiant indrug trafcking, as we discuss elow (.J at 8

We need not adress te mmiration Judges alteative determination tat te respondent didnot suor s moton to suress wt testmony, as equred ytr o rcn 19 I&Nec 609 (BIA 1988 IJ at . We also disagree wit te respondent tat, in te ce of teresondents prima cie sowing, te Immigation Judge sold ave called upon te DHS to

justi te maer in wic it obtained te evidence (Respondents Br. at 7-8 e respondentsonly allegation was te lack of requisite wings tus, tat is te oly issue tat required aresponse As we concude above, it is wel-seled hat te lack of wings does not ierentlyconstitute egregious Foh Amendment violation



6/15

A6 663 553

We rm e mmgrato Jes cocso ta the resoet s emovabe as chargeA covcto s ot ecessary ae o be amssble f te evece sows tht theato ocer kows or reaso to beeve" the ae s a ct tracker. See Cuevasv. Holder F3d 213 W 653359 5 C Dec 1 213; see also Gaces v. A ' Gen 6 F.3 1337 345 t Cr. 21 Mate of Favea 6 &N Dec. 53

B 199 Maer of Rico 6 & Dec 8 185 197 There s o cotro caseaw deg a reaso o beeve;" oever cotrary o the resoet's coteto we haveereted the stadar as smar to a robabe case" reqremet J. at 7; Resoets r.a 5-1) See Mae of U-H- 23 &N Dec 355 A 22)

Eve uder a more set resoable sbstata ad obatve evece" sd geby the resoet however base o he resoets ece o see Aarco-Seao v INS22 F.3 116 19 9 Cr. 2 te mrato Jge coecty etemed that the Smet s rde of oof Te car drve by the resoet as amost 65 ods ofmarjaa Ths arge amo of a cotroe substce was ot r ersoa se a as sogevece of afckg

The resoet ages tha te DHS d ot rove that he a kog a coscousacant" the rackg scheme as he ee kow the drus ere he car a eeta he owe the car Resoet's r. a 2 J a 8) See Maer of Rco upra at 186. Teresoet's a stemes o e CP ocers wee suscos s was hs emeor.Frher e aree h the mmrato Jude te vast cosstecy betwee hs statemets tothe CB ocers ad s re satemet ve drg the S terroato s sbstatalevdece of s gy oege J. a -8 ee Alacoeao v IN supa at 192hog reaso to eeve g where ae s reste th are qatty of marjuaa hs car ese ales cam tha e as awre of the resece of the rgs; see asoUned Saes v. esioTrejo 45 3 97 91 5t Cr. 995 escb the ccmstaaevece se determg lty koede" te cotext of he ossesso cgthe eda's cosstet statemets. Tee s sgcat crcustta evdece tasos a of he resoets kowg arcato eve whot mak a eatverece om he esoet's esa to esfy Therere we afr the rato Jge'scocso tht the S estabshe here was reaso to beeve" ta e esoet as akowg act dg racg a hs deteato ta the resoet was removablea carge. s te resoet ot e ay acatos r reef e ow oer bessue

ORDER The resoets aea s dsmsse

Te te States Cor of eas r e h Crct has ot tae a osto o chstaar to ay ts coext ee Cuevas v Holder upa at *3We adress e moresrge stanard the erest of y adress e arumets e aa.

4



7/15

-060 663 553

n he aer o

NIT STATS DPATNT F USTICXCUV IC FOR IMMRTN VEW

Igron CouE so exas

emo Proceengs

Saador eo Rea esonen

CHAR(S) 22()(2(C)(reson o eee rug cer)

APPICTIN(): None

TN(S) Moo o ernae Remoal Proceedns an Adm euraw Permanen Rese Ae)

Moo o Suress Eence/Saemes (ra)

F ESPNENT Danel Caudlo Esq

F S

Bcgun

Alla Tar s

Onebry 7 203 he Demen of omen Secury (S) sse aNoce o Aper chrgng responen wh eg resen en (PR) ueeee an ag ale wom e S as reas o eee s a racer acoroled susace. esonde as u cosel aded o aleae adermae rese ae sau bu ene nowg of or be ow ossessono a qua o maruaa a he me e crse e border rom exco o e UedSaes

A ea reardn ese coesed reoa cares was ed on Auus 7203 were ocumens a ora esmoy were cosdered. esonen o

es Aer cosero o he ocuey eence ad ora esmony from egoernme's wesses he cor ey respoe's oos o ernae reoroceengs n sppress eence ss he charge o remo cuaeaboe n orer he resonen's remo ro he Ue Ses o Mexco

1


8/15

2. Testony

prsnt t inesss in supp f eir ase o POsusts an rr retion Oiers previusy nn as Inspetors orea te port o entry in E Paso Texas at e ie responents arriva a he inspein

staon on pril 23 202

Te firs iness as Oier Quntanar testfie a e is a ur yearveteran te u and Brder Pretin ay Oier Quintanar a thier enountere e rsponen a pria on pri 23 202 Durin erouine inspetion responent Oir Quintanar a as prevousy in El Pasoen i girrien ale an t i at e as t faher o a ne ayespondent ten travele to exi o visi e er an d esponent ano at te po o ent drivng is fternla's ar on s ay a to E Paso o piup hs moer an tae er ex t see e n l

Ofier Quintanar egan o suse soetng as n en e hee tereors reang te vehie resonent as drivn It soe a s paiularvehie ad rsse he rder only six es n te ast six month Oer uitanareeved ha a person i a rfrien expeting a hil ud ge ore vs an yne visi per onth (n averae Oer Quntanar a sed a e eieed oe neous eavir exe y te responen an ha resonen dd n appear

e as exe as one u expet fro a ne paren Oer Quintanar aloobed resonen o apar even r neus n reerred o sna

The next tness as Oier va enountered respnden en h asreerre seona t seonary respnent reeaed staeen o Oier

Qunanar ta he as retuning E Paso o pi up hi moer an ten return Mexo o vs te ne ay espnen aso repeated is aim a he veie eas riving enge o is faterina

Oer Ava ega hs pysal nspeton o e vhe e asgrespondent queston Oer vta oseed tha respondent appeared o e veyuie ore ue tan one u expet a ne aher o e Durng the inspetnOer vta ale n e assane f ne te ann oers and a dru deetndog wa used o e ou te vehle The dog aee n oe he rear es ad

uher nspeton o ths re reveaed a gree leay susane eted posv rhe presene o aruana

espen as n anufe and sd in e "eaouse2 anscur ut e arrv pa gs r n ecurty vstgatns

1 "Primary' s the fs staon a peso ecoues whe cossg he bode dvig a oto ehcle.2 Ts s a od-fasione te f the bng e fme US Cusoms Sece caed te oceo admstae headqates a te ot o eny

2


9/15

\,

ueau (a of e Igaon and Cusoms Enoement agen n te mean teOes vta an Quntana as as sm te C Offes egan to sanlete sne's vee ng naand e Oes ultmatly nd soe 60es o auana seee sly te tes of e vele egng a ltte ess

tan 65 ouns

e nex tness tat as ale as esnent esondent togh ouneeuse to anse ost questons n 5 mendmen selfnmnaton gounds

3 Doments

In leu of esnens teston te HS sumtte tten stateens ade te HS agent an tansated vesons o tten sateents esponent ade o teHS agent ae s aest3 n e tten stateme ext 3 ta espnden adeto statemens n e sateents espondent atulaes

tat e oes no no the ne of te veie e as dving at e as nate aeoo and ee a o of vng te vele o E

Paso $60000 an ting o sel te vee tat e not no of e onens majuana o the vee ta e ad een omse tat tee as notng ng t te vele y te

peole o ed a e as "use y te eoe tat e a ta e s a nest man

a sees sh s noene

ton t Suppess espondents Statements

esondent as moved s u to supes an statements espndent adeto HS Sea gents eause s statement ee suppessed te Dstt Coun e a poeengs aganst esndent e motn l e ene

oton to suppes evdene n eoval poeengs s a dsavoed patean onl e gante n te event egegous voatons o te espndentsononal gs S v L z- ndoza 6 US 032 US v Lo zOz 33 3d 225 (5 C 2002 Te oad of mgaon ppeal as omulatea e o e en a esponden seeks o supess evdene n a emva eagae o Ba as I. & De 60 ( a mnmum the esonden oaes te am egang te legaty of evene us ome o oof

esalsng a ma fae as efe te HS ll e aled uon to assue teuen of justfyg te ane n t tae te evee d ee an alen

3 Respodet objeced to te cots adsso of these staee o he god ha these vesae taeme ee sppeed in he ed ates Dsc ou e pes ude s e dcused oe dea below

3


10/15

ee to hege te dty o doet he ee oeg of dvt o ent o h e te n o o y tetoyd

In th oet thogh on oe ee tht h o wttetee e o S Se get t e eed the eo egee tee e ttee wee ed y te Dt Co oeedg he o oe ot gee

the o oy f oe o te Dtt Jge gtg prtheeedt ot t e " evene otned elt of ofeonegey otne vo o Fh edet ght the oy o theo ode Jge Fn otvo etee tht the eoet who evey ttle Eglh ot owgy elgnt wve h gt to let tehl gond dge otlvo d tht te teet e yeodet te he w te o eod to he edhoe, he

qetoe y S Se get ( hd t e ee ee the Sget d not e he eont o h Mr ght lgge the eodedetoo wel

o he extet tt eoet et that t oe ottte h feog the ot wl low t (lthog t ot n dv o he eodethel oweve eodet t dd t o oto wth teoy ee y e o re up. dtoly he o d h th vey oteh to y the S S get doe ot ottte the tye of egegoot te y the See Co ( h Ct eg the eoo wh e to ey vony tet de y e eone fte eg

ght wth t ot of the vehe he w dvg he eogge nte tht eonet w tetg to ovee wth the ge heEgh gge ee w Sh g get who od ve ee edo to gve thee ght t e o d tht he ge ee ghhg h w e eodet wed to do o he o etg ooe et hve ee ted othg egego ll

h the w y edet oto o e h tteeto ee e l o eet e oel eee o ea t oee o te o h e, hee w o egego volo o te eodetCoto ght g to he evel o Fh ede de oe voo

4


11/15

5. Staemen of the Law

Te er esn t beee is efine by he Imigraio n aoyc r ar o Iai ppeals preceent. easn beee i a proofhres n te ierrcy f proo tt is geater than a easonable suspicion bt

beow ha of reonerance o he evience

The US peme Cour has ineee he er eason o eieve in IN 87 t e ous wit be ce S Crez 4 S 1 he Cos ae ikewise e at the e "reson beeve s synnyms wh"prbabe case n other conexts See e S v Goran 314 3 105 (9t Cir (hin ha the "reason to believe staar or et into a weng o execuea searc waran eqire prbable cse The Boa has also note ha he phrase"reasonable groun to beee is popery eqae wi "probabe cause whch is ess emaning stanar than "preponerance o he evience atr of H- 3l& ec 77 7 A. 005.

The Cous ave e ha pbabe cuse is a pracca non-chncal ccepha s efe by eeyay expeence s such cnno be rece ega rulesa t s not cable of being qanife ece o a ercenages ala .Pringe 540 US 366 (2003 nsea probabe cause eerminaions vocommonsense concusions about huan behaor Pbable caue ess he oaliyof he circusances aises a paicaize spicio at an iniviual is engage i

wongog S. Coe 499 US a418.

Pbabe cuse is he easoabe beief tat a crie was come a ha hesec eretrae e crie ong u US. 371 US 471 1963 e ssicin

tha the niiua s engge in wrongong ms be base o ecfc aclabeacts togehe wth ationa ifereces fm hse facts US v. BrgnoniPonce 2US 873 88 (95. or exampe in S v BgnoniPonce he Co sae haae ase for stong a ece r ae s cou cue suc facto s

1 he characerisc o e area in he ehce encounere2 e veces x o he orer3. he s paers o trac on partcular roa he ehice i encounere4 kow ale rac aes5 inormaio abo recet egal boer crog he ara6. erraic rvng or ovous attemps o evae oicers

7 asecs of he ehicle; such as saton wagons wit large cmamenfr on ses r spe ires se r rnsping cnceae aliese ece apea be eai ae i a ave a earanbe paeges e icers may bsee pess yig o ean

8 e cacteistc appearace of pesons w ie n exic suc as he

5


12/15

\i\

ode of de and a

In no aes 46 US 3 (983 e Speme Co oened e pooge or pobable ae a eplaed wh a oay of ranes eGae ade ea a probable ase ay be aned eee ha does o

esabls a 0% pbaby of gl

o ou as hed ha he e eason o beee deand ay lee ofdee poof e ey addresse ege o a eon o eee ge Mae of co 6 & De 8 (I 9 In o 6 pond o ajana ee

fnd n oneae ompaens of e ehle dng an npeo a a P of Enyhe alen dng he ehle naly ol nesgaos ha he ehle had been loaned

h and a he dd no kno he ehle onaned aana Aodng oesgaos e lae aed ha he had been pad o de e ehle ss hebder and sspeed a soeng a n e ee bu ha e d no know wa.A al oplan wa aly fled agans he aen u wa ae dsed.

A hs elon heang he ale efed a e ehle wa beng oned o h one dy hle s a as beng epared ad a e nee sae esgas hae a been pad o de he ehle aos he bode e IS eseed anpeo wo efed a e had obeed he aen dng e el n esoro e PO on eea oe oasos. e oad held a ese of a ageay o dgs ombed mpausbe oradoy esony was sue oso a aon o beee dg suggg hage under A 1(a)(2) (7) rede a lN 1(a((C (990e seq.

In reason o belee admsby ases he buden s o e en o eabs

a reason o beee de no e In he ae of a aplan aonee e ben on e aen o poe admy INA 0()(A)pas fo amsso by egaon e aens peen e ed Saes woe o bee aded o aled o wo eek en a ae ohe a a deged o Eny 8 C 23.(d)() eoe 8 CF 24() ly ae oales pree wh admo e urden of rog adl lear d beyda do Ag ale mu als eablh admsbly "leay and eyd a do8 C 40(b

Coesely n e ae la peae esde e ude e S esbs emoably by ear and ong edee uuan I A

0()(3)(A) lhoug I 0()( akes no dsno beee eaeneens and ohe aens I 0 (a(3(C poes a a ale lawfulyamed for peane esene n he ned Saes shal o be regare as eekgadsson no he ed Saes pposes of he mgra aw [eep ndeea eeaed anes] Oe o he eneaed rmae snadssbly nder I 2(a((C I s hoeer he goeens buen o

6


13/15

eabli ta a eanen eient i egae a eeking amiion. See Matte ofoa, 22 l& De 66 BI 999; Matte of Riv n, 25 I & De 623 BA 2011

n 22a2C ae nvving aw eanen eien e DS ae ben o eablng a e aen eeing aion beaue e i lea

an onvining evene o bev e i o a been a g ae f i bue iet ten e S a neeaiy etabie inaiiity une 22a2C Butif e S oe n eabi ta e awf panent een i eeking aiion,

e nay age ae ie an eova oeen t e eia

Many fat ae oenialy eleva eteine wete tee i ienobabe aue o ean o beieve uppo an 22a2C age, anome ave been ie in o eiion eo beavio i maniaeviene of giy nweg Und Sa v. Caa, 2 3 600, 607 5 Ci199 Unie Stae v O ga yna, 3 50 54, 5 Ci 199Conioune of guit may ao be etabie by inonien aemen an

imauibe toie Ute Sae v P nninton, 20 3 5, 5 5 Ci. 1Wi ega to inonitent taeent mae to e CBP Offie, ea tenge eviene of a imina efenan giy knowege inonitentaeent to feea oa Unite Stae v. Diaz-Carr on, 915 2 951 95555 Ci 199 Wie an aien may oe an eanaton abou being oiite to woka a oumen ouie o utte ive a etaneibe eanation fo aefenan ation i a of e ovea iumantia eviene fom wi guityknwlege may e nee a 955

Oe eevan fato ine (1) ving in tae 2 iving o a ueomonly ue by mgge, 3 fae ai o itizen, an neune See

US v Garia-Baro, 6 3 305 9 Ci 997 i ee to a geteiganine aleing iniating a eent eee o aot, [a] aine ni ane anupy e obable aue n e nte o ea waant aiatio Uie Statv. f r, 9 .2 632, 639 9 Ci.193 Ao, aloug e fat t,aoe, not neay ela an may ot onttt oae a, t a eea

ato See U v Vialoo 161 3 25 5t Ci 1ven auing at te alen i no efniivey now tat te veile otan

g a tat e wa ue by beg tol at e wa meely aongoumen, eieate gnoan may uitute fo guilt kowlge. We kowlegeon te a of te eenant annot be etabie meey by emotatig a e

eenan wa negigen ael, o ooi nowege an be infee if teefenan eibeaey bine ie t eiene of a fa 5t Cit Patte Inn 37 ee a ne ae v Mor no, 5 3 465 476 5 C999, e enie 5 2 u a upoe omen oie woie o t CBPO beae b im ie anno efuy age la fnowege beae a eanabe pen w ave now oeing wa ai i

7


14/15


15/15

7 Reie m Remova

Resondent has not dentiied an m o ee om emova that is avaiabe tohim n s the o awae o an eie

8 Odes

ORDER esondents moon to teinate emova oceedings s dened

THEORDER: Resndents motion t sess hs wtten statements made to HS

Secal gents is denied

RTHERORER Resondent is nd inadmissbe as chaged in the Notice to ea

RTHEROER Resondent s odeed emoved om te nite States to eco

Wiam Lee AbttImmgaton Jdge

9

ate ugt 3 03

Documents

Salvador Alejo Reta, A060 663 553 (BIA Jan. 15, 2014)