11
ALEXANDRIA CARR Chemical Engineering University of Louisville 1st of 3 Terms Site Energy Steve Moor

SABIC Final Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SABIC Final Presentation

ALEXANDRIA CARRChemical EngineeringUniversity of Louisville1st of 3 Terms

Site EnergySteve Moor

Page 2: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 2

• Site Utility Tracker Survey

• Lighting Stores Analysis

• MtV Energy Intensity Model

• Energy Conservation Insulation Program (ECIP)

• Optimization, Cost Accounting

• Sustainability, Standards

• Sustainability Metrics

• Sustainability, Personnel Protection

Projects

TERM SUMMARY

BPA 3 Lighting Retrofit Upgrade

Benefits

Page 3: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 3

BACKGROUND

Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007-Act of Congress mandates 200% increased bulb efficiency -T12, >60 W incandescent bulbs, fixtures discontinued

T5 Fixture:1 bulbT12 Fixture: 4 bulbs 277% Total Increase in Bulb Life

T12 T5Life ~12,000 hrs ~45,000 hrsBulbs/Fixture 4 1Watts/Fixture 150 54Lumens/Bulb ~2300 ~4100Diameter Size 12/8 in 5/8 in

Page 4: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 4

BENEFITS

Annual Savings:-Energy Savings: $11,991/yr (184,471 kW-h)-Replacement Cost Savings: $6,562/yr

Rebates: expire this year (2013)-$22,000-28% of total project cost

BPA 3 First Floor Increased Lighting

Intensity

Lumens/ft2

Before After

Page 5: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 5

PROGRESSION TIMELINE

Tracked Results

Detailed Engineering Phase

AlignmentCreated Sourcing Scope

Created Installation

Scope

Managed Installation

Cost Analysis

Identified Opportunity

Budgetary Scope

Conceptual Engineering Phase

Actual Project Cost:$78,000

Feb/March 2013

April 2013

April 2013

April 2013

April 2013

2012 2012 2012

Project Estimate: $99,000

Cost Reduction Savings: $21,000

Page 6: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 6

PROJECT APPROACH

Project Approach Run to FailureFixture Installation Time Low High

Total Installed Cost Medium High

Funding Capital Maintenance

Installation Rebates Yes No (2013 Only)

Electrical Savings Maximized(sensors)

Moderate

Standardization High Low

Alignment:-Discussed installation options with Maintenance Team, Unit, and Leadership

Strategy

Area Option 1 Option 2 Option 3Hallways/Offices/Labs SABIC I/Es SABIC I/Es ICS

Maintenance Shop SABIC I/Es ICS ICS

Page 7: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 7

INSTALLATION SCOPE

-Detailed engineering services performed in houseSavings: $9,400

-Cost Reduction Opportunities:No rewiring or conduit needed No high bay fixture rearrangement No sensors on emergency lighting

Green: SABIC Installation

Red: ICS Installation

Total Cost Reduction Savings: $21,000

Page 8: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 8

12 Offices, 1 Hallway Completed

hhh

RESULTS TO DATE

Before After

Watts (W) Bulbs Lumens

(lm)Watts (W) Bulbs Lumens

(lm)

88,275 136 2,030 61,950 35 5,100

60% Watt Reduction74% Bulb Reduction 40% Lumen Increase

Page 9: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 9

Completed:

Secured Funding

Sourcing Scope

Installation Scope

Tracked Energy Savings

Disposal Plans

MOC

PROJECT PROGRESS

Next Steps:

Complete Installation

Continue Tracking Results

Implement to Other Units

Page 10: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 10

• Project Management

• Energy Management Ideals

• Optimization

• Standardization

• Sourcing & Construction Scope

• Cost Analysis

• Specifications

• LEAN/Six Sigma

• MOC

KEY LEARNINGS

Page 11: SABIC Final Presentation

No. 11

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special thanks to: Steve MoorBrock Ryan

John BohleberDoug Drone

Phenol and BPA Teams.

Questions?