21
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES & SPECIAL EDUCATION ELIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February 27, 2013

S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES & SPECIAL EDUCATION

ELIGIBILITY

Daniel Hochbaum

Equal Justice Works Fellow

Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery

February 27, 2013

Page 2: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

Fellowship sponsor

Has sponsored 8 two-year Equal Justice Works fellowships since 2005 in cities all across the US

o Fellowship organizer

o D.C.-based national organization that helps launch the next generation of public interest lawyers

o Fellowship host organization

o Federally mandated agency that protects the rights of people with disabilities in Illinois

Page 3: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

THE LD PROJECT

1. Self Advocacy Assistance2. Community Outreach3. Institutional Knowledge4. Direct Representation

Focus on: Initial eligibility Students in need of intensive interventions Returning to our clients

Page 4: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

WHAT IS SLD?

Page 5: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

DEFINING LEARNING DISABILITIES

Forget about medical definitions Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

(IDEA) Term: Specific Learning Disability Law: 34 C.F.R. § 300.8(c)(10)

A disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language,

spoken or written…

Page 6: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

…that may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to:

Listen Think Speak Read Write Spell OR do mathematical

calculations…

…including conditions such as:

perceptual disabilities

brain injury

minimal brain

dysfunction

Dyslexia

AND

developmental

aphasia…

DEFINING LEARNING DISABILITIES

Page 7: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

But wait!

There’s more!

DEFINING LEARNING DISABILITIES

Page 8: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

… LD does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of:

visual, hearing, or motor disabilitiesmental retardationemotional disturbanceor

of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage

DEFINING LEARNING DISABILITIES

34 C.F.R. § 300.8(c)(10)(ii)

Page 9: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

WHICH METHODS ARE USED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT HAS A

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY?

Page 10: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

DETERMINING SLD: TWO* METHODS

The Old(er)* Way:Severe Discrepancy

A difference between ability and achievement

Schools give IQ testing and Achievement testing and look for a gap

States can determine how severe the discrepancy must be

The New Way:Response to Intervention

Three Tier Process (typically)

Increasingly intense interventions at each tier

Students are constantly screened and interventions are adjusted accordingly

Page 11: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

Need state laws- Each state must adopt criteria for determining whether

a child has an SLD as defined in IDEA Can’t force severe discrepancy

- State criteria may not require use of severe discrepancy model in determining whether a child has an SLD

Must allow RtI- State criteria must permit use of a process based on

the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention (RtI)

Other methods permitted- State criteria may permit use of other alternative

research-based procedures

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.307

Page 12: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

EVALUATIONS

Referral and Consent See § 300.309

Timelines Schools must comply with the timelines for evaluations

in the statute Observations

§ 300.310 states that a child suspected of having SLD must be observed in the classroom as part of the evaluation School may use observation information from before

the child was referred for an evaluation OR may observe after the referral

Page 13: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

WHO DETERMINES SLD?

Page 14: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

Determination of SLD is made by…

WHO DETERMINES SLD? 34 C.F.R. § 300.308 

Child’s Parents Child’s regular teacher At least one person qualified to

conduct individual diagnostic examinations of children

Such as… school psychologist speech-language pathologist remedial reading teacher

Page 15: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

HOW DO SCHOOLS DETERMINE WHETHER

A STUDENT HAS A SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY?

Page 16: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.309

Factors Considered Child’s achievement levels in 1 (or more) of 8

specified areas

Oral expressionListening comprehensionWritten expressionBasic reading skill

Reading fluency skillsReading comprehensionMath calculationMath problem solving

Page 17: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

Below age or grade level Child’s progress in 1 (or more) of these 8 areas is not

sufficient to meet age or State-approved grade level standards when RtI is being used

OR

Pattern Child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in

performance, achievement, or both relative to: Age State-approved grade level standards, or intellectual development

that group determines is relevant to identification of SLD…

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.309

Page 18: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

But wait!

There’s more!

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.309

Page 19: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

o Group determines that being below age/grade level or that pattern is not primarily the result of:

Visual, hearing, or motor disability

Mental retardation Emotional disturbance Cultural factors Environmental or economic disadvantage

Limited English proficiency

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.309

Page 20: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

1 of 8 Factors

Below age or grade

levelOR

Pattern

Not Primarily because of Other Causes

DETERMINING SLD: 34 C.F.R. § 300.309

SLD Eligibility!

consideration of whether the child did not receive appropriate instruction in reading or math

consideration of data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement (and

progress) at reasonable intervals

Page 21: S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February

o All of this information must be put into an eligibility determination document

o Each member of the team must state whether they agree with eligibility determination

DOCUMENTATION OF ELIGIBILITY