Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RURAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN:
THINK LOCAL, INVOLVE LOCALS
Fanny Boeraeve & Prof. Marc Dufrêne
Nathalie Pipart & Prof. Nicolas Dendoncker
DELPHI METHOD
FOCUS GROUP
1 Introduce topic and objectives to participants
2 Spontaneous ES list
3 Present ES
4 Ranking of ES
5 Presentation of results + discussion
6 Ranking II
TWO APPLICATION EXAMPLES
CASE 1 CASE 2
Context of the project
Scientific research on the contribution of agro-ecological farms to the delivery of ES
Development of a local rural development scheme
Scope of the project
Scientific research Policy-decision support project
Aim of the participatory exercice
Guide the research towards ES which are relavant to the local area and to the local actors
Provide a rural development scheme in accordance with local values and needs
Session S2a Session T9
GLIMPSE ON SOME OUTCOMES –
CASE 1
7
8
GLIMPSE ON SOME OUTCOMES –
CASE 1
GLIMPSE ON SOME OUTCOMES –
CASE 2
1 Introduce topic and objectives to participants
2 Spontaneous ES list
3 Present ES
4 Ranking of ES
5 Presentation of results + discussion
6 Ranking II
1 Introduce topic and objectives to participants
2 Spontaneous ES list
3 Present ES
4 Ranking of ES
5 Presentation of results + discussion
6 ES selection by consent
I’m not against
DECISION MAKING BY CONSENT
I think this way
Me that way
This way
That way
What about…
This?
Sounds like a good plan
Why not
We have a
consent!
REFLEXIVE THOUGHTS
Frustrations due to overlapping ES
Usefullness of ES bundles?
But flood protection and erosion…it’s very much linked
REFLEXIVE THOUGHTS
Yes, it’s linked to soil quality as well!
REFLEXIVE THOUGHTS
Frustrations due to difficulty of the task to assign a ranking
Prefer free scoring?
REFLEXIVE THOUGHTS
• Time constraints, stakeholders expectations, biaised reprensativity
Tradeoff between action-oriented research and «standard» scientific approaches
THANK YOU