RTI Snapshot: A Model for Annual Assessment of Your RTI System

RTI Snapshot: A Model for AnnualRTI Snapshot: A Model for Annual Assessment of Your RTI SystemAssessment of Your RTI System

May 9th, 2012May 9th, 2012

OrRTI Spring ConferenceOrRTI Spring Conference

Bend, OregonBend, Oregon

Goals for todayGoals for today

Walk through a step by step process for Walk through a step by step process for building an assessment of your RTI system building an assessment of your RTI system that is . . . that is . . . – Efficient,Efficient,– Feasible,Feasible, – Sustainable,Sustainable,– and most importantly, and most importantly, Meaningful.Meaningful.

Examine Examine RTI Snapshot RTI Snapshot data for North data for North Clackamas for the past two years to Clackamas for the past two years to identify strengths and areas in need of identify strengths and areas in need of improvement. improvement.

Who we are . . .Who we are . . . District Enrollment in 2011-12: 17,260District Enrollment in 2011-12: 17,260

– 11% English Learners11% English Learners– 14% Special Education14% Special Education– 44% Free & Reduced Price Lunch44% Free & Reduced Price Lunch

Student DiversityStudent Diversity– White/Euroamerica White/Euroamerica 14,81514,815– Hispanic/Latino/Spanish Hispanic/Latino/Spanish 2,736 2,736– AsianAsian 1,573 1,573– Russian/Ukrainian/SlavicRussian/Ukrainian/Slavic 1,128 1,128– American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 1,007 1,007– Black/African AmericanBlack/African American 680 680– Native Hawaiian/Pacific IslanderNative Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 262 262

Who we are . . .Who we are . . .

18 elementary schools implementing 18 elementary schools implementing RTI in ReadingRTI in Reading

– 9 School-wide Title Schools9 School-wide Title Schools– 3 Targeted Assisted Title Schools3 Targeted Assisted Title Schools– 6 Non-title schools6 Non-title schools

Where we’ve been . . .Where we’ve been . . .

Began discussing

RTI

2003-042003-04 2004-052004-05 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08 2008-092008-09 2009-102009-10 2010-112010-11 2011-122011-12

Began using DIBELS

Began implementing

Treasures

Began Tier II and Tier III

interventions

Began assessing

the health of our RTI system

Began using RTI for LD eligibility

Revisited expectations

for Core instruction

and LD evaluations

How our teams in the district connectHow our teams in the district connect . . . . . .

Curriculum & Instruction

Effective Behavioral and Instructional Supports Systems Team (EBISS)

K-12 Literacy Plan Team

RTI Leadership Team

RTI Leadership TeamRTI Leadership Team

Meets 2-5 times each school yearMeets 2-5 times each school year Membership rotatesMembership rotates Includes:Includes:

– District Administrators for Gen ED, SPED, and District Administrators for Gen ED, SPED, and ELDELD

– PrincipalsPrincipals– Classroom teachersClassroom teachers– Learning SpecialistLearning Specialist– CounselorCounselor– Instructional Coach/SPED TOSAsInstructional Coach/SPED TOSAs– RTI CoordinatorRTI Coordinator

RTI Leadership Team Goal for RTI Leadership Team Goal for 2010-112010-11

Develop a way to assess the health Develop a way to assess the health of our RTI system in each school that of our RTI system in each school that is easy to implement, sustainable, is easy to implement, sustainable, and useful.and useful.

Step 1: Step 1: Build a frameworkBuild a framework

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.





Step 2: Research & Step 2: Research & BrainstormBrainstorm









Step 3: PilotStep 3: Pilot



Spring 2011 PilotSpring 2011 Pilot

The DIET-SB was embedded into the The DIET-SB was embedded into the annual Title I evaluations for the 9 annual Title I evaluations for the 9 school-wide Title schoolsschool-wide Title schools

4 Title and 4 Non-title schools 4 Title and 4 Non-title schools completed the RTI snapshotcompleted the RTI snapshot

Implementing the DIET-SB Implementing the DIET-SB

Representative school team met with a facilitatorRepresentative school team met with a facilitator Everyone had a set of cards numbered 0 to 3Everyone had a set of cards numbered 0 to 3 Facilitator read item choices out loud and Facilitator read item choices out loud and

provided clarifications as needed provided clarifications as needed Each team member held up a card and the Each team member held up a card and the

principal recorded the most common response principal recorded the most common response and his/her own responseand his/her own response

Team discussed that item for 2-3 minutesTeam discussed that item for 2-3 minutes At the end, team took 5-10 minutes to identify At the end, team took 5-10 minutes to identify

area(s) of strength and area(s) in need of area(s) of strength and area(s) in need of improvement.improvement.



Implementing the RTI SnapshotImplementing the RTI Snapshot

Audit occurred in early April (Used tax day Audit occurred in early April (Used tax day as our deadline.)as our deadline.)

Coach worked with principal, learning Coach worked with principal, learning specialist, and ELD specialist to complete specialist, and ELD specialist to complete the Snapshotthe Snapshot

Snapshot emailed to Student Support Snapshot emailed to Student Support Services secretary who created charts to Services secretary who created charts to represent the datarepresent the data

Charts were reviewed with teams at Title I Charts were reviewed with teams at Title I School Evaluation meetingsSchool Evaluation meetings



Students in Interventions School P, 2011-12

50%of Total Population in Interventions

50% 50% 55%

45%English

Speakers

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1

Perc

en

t in

In

terv

en

tio

ns

% of Total Population in Interventions Boys Girls ELL English Speakers

Sources: RTI Annual Snapshot, April 9, 2012, eSIS

Boys English Learners

Girls

Step 4: Scale up & Step 4: Scale up & make it sustainablemake it sustainable



Annual Assessment for 2011-12Annual Assessment for 2011-12

Embedded into annual School-wide Embedded into annual School-wide Title I evaluations AND . . .Title I evaluations AND . . .

Offered to non-title and Targeted Offered to non-title and Targeted Assisted Title schools through half-Assisted Title schools through half-day RTI work-sessions funded day RTI work-sessions funded through an OrRTI mini-grant.through an OrRTI mini-grant.

Step 5: Make it matter!Step 5: Make it matter!



From problem to solution . . .From problem to solution . . .

Help teams Help teams develop action develop action plansplans

Get feedbackGet feedback Check in on Check in on

progressprogress



Sample School Action Plan, Sample School Action Plan, Goal 1Goal 1



Sample School Action Plan, Sample School Action Plan, Goal 2Goal 2



NCSDNCSDRTI Annual RTI Annual

Assessment ResultsAssessment Results

2010-20122010-2012

DIET-SB District Summary Team Averages

North Clackamas School District

2.5

2.1

2.8

2.4

3

2.2

2.92.92.7

1.8

2.42.3

2.8

2

2.72.9

0.7

1.2

1.7

2.5

1.8

2.32.1

2.8

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Tea

m A

vera

ges

Title Schools 2010-11 Title Schools 2011-12 Non-Title and TAS 2011-12

DIET-SB School Summary Leadership

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

School A

School B

School C

School D

School E

School F

School G

School H

School I

School J

School K

School L

School M

School N

School O

School P

2010-11

2011-12

Non-Title TAS Title Schools

DIET-SB School Summary Progress Monitoring

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

School A

School B

School C

School D

School E

School F

School G

School H

School I

School J

School K

School L

School M

School N

School O

School P

2010-11

2011-12

Non-Title TAS Title Schools

Students in Interventions, 2011-12 Title Schools

50%43%

34%

45%41%41%

35%42%42%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

School H

School I

School J

School K

School L

School M

School N

School O

School P

Title S

chool Ave

rage

Title School

Average

Percent of Students in Interventions who are Boys, 2011-12 Title Schools

50%

64%

53%

61%55%

48% 51%55% 56%

58%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

School H

School I

School J

School K

School L

School M

School N

School O

School P

Distri

ct A

vera

ge

TitleSchool

Average

ELL Students, 2011-12Title Schools

16%19%

10%14%

23%

34%

43%

9%10%10%

52%

25% 26%

16%20%

55%

41%

32%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

School H

School I

School J

School K

School L

School M

School N

School O

School P

Percent of ELL Population inSchool

Percent of Students inInterventions who are ELL

Questions, comments, ideas, Questions, comments, ideas, suggestions?suggestions?

Kelly TuomikoskiKelly [email protected]

Our RTI Website:Our RTI Website:http://www.nclack.k12.or.us//Domain/249

For help navigating our website:For help navigating our website:Gail MeyerGail Meyer

[email protected]

Documents

RTI Snapshot: A Model for Annual Assessment of Your RTI System