69
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Curriculum Based Assessment Determining Level Determining Level of Intensity and of Intensity and Type of Services Type of Services Needed Needed

PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Curriculum Based Assessment

  • Upload
    trapper

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Curriculum Based Assessment. Determining Level of Intensity and Type of Services Needed. Objectives. Define and discuss the following tools used in Responsiveness to Instruction: Curriculum-based Assessment and Norms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation

Curriculum Based Assessment

Determining Level of Determining Level of Intensity and Type of Intensity and Type of

Services NeededServices Needed

Page 2: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Objectives

Define and discuss the following tools used in Responsiveness to Instruction:– Curriculum-based Assessment and Norms– Baseline data, Goals and Aimlines, Progress

Monitoring– Graphing data– Decision-making rules– Revisions of Hypotheses/Interventions (Level

IIIe)

Page 3: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

EVALUATION THATINFORMS INSTRUCTION

Baseline Data: How do the student’s skills compare to those of peers (normative sample)

Goals and Aimlines: Where would we like the student’s skills to be at the end of the designated intervention period?

Progress Monitoring: Is the student developing the skills we are teaching?

Decision Rules: Do we need to change what we are doing?

Page 4: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA)

Data collection tools derived directly from the curriculum that student is expected to learn

The T in RIOT. (Documentation: Level IIIb. Develop an

Assessment Plan)

Page 5: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA)

CBM is believed to reduce the gap between assessment and instruction

Aides teachers in improving instruction Improved communication Higher level of sensitivity Administration time is shorter More cost effective

Page 6: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

To Use CBAs in RtI: Normative Data is Required

Why do we do it? How is it useful?– To provide comparison data on skill levels of

students with the same curriculum and demographics of our county

When or how often do we do it?– Every 5 years

How do we do it?– Stratified Random Sample– Fall, Winter and Spring Windows

Page 7: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

ACADEMICS

Reading, Math and Written Language Probes; e.g., CBAs

Page 8: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Probes: Measuring Academic Skills

Reading: The Big Five Areas– Phonemic Awareness– Phonics– Fluency– Vocabulary– Comprehension

Page 9: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Probes: Measuring Academic Skills

Math– Calculation– Numbers and Operations– Measurement and Geometry– Algebra– Data Analysis (Grades 6 and 8)– Probability (Grade 7)

Written Expression– Conventions– Spelling

Page 10: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Collecting Baseline Data

Documentation: Grade Level Data Sheet

Page 11: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Baseline Data: Comparison to Peers

How is Baseline Data Collected? • Student is given the grade level probes used

in norming• Administration starts with the first item on the

page each time• 3 administrations over 3 days in one week• Median scores in each probe area are

compared to the grade level norms

Page 12: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Determining Where to Intervene

Skills of student compared to peers

Lowest level skills (the building blocks)

Page 13: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Back Sampling and Diagnostic Assessment

Back Sampling– If the student’s skills in the lowest skill areas on

grade level are weak, then baseline data is collected on the probes for the previous grade level to inform instruction.

Diagnostic Assessment– Can be completed by reviewing actual skills in an

area. Ex. Which sounds/blends/digraphs does the student know? Which math facts are known?

Page 14: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Skills: Discrete or Complex

Discrete Skills are generally taught by practice and over learning. These might include as phonemic awareness, blends, sight recognition, fluency, math calculation, etc.

Complex Skill Sets required a combination of skills to perform. These might include fluency, vocabulary, reading comprehension, math concepts, written expression, etc

Page 15: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Fluency: Discrete or Complex?

Fluency might be considered– Complex if it is the highest level skill on which the

staff are intervening with the student because the student is still working on building blocks or prerequisite skills such as phonological awareness, phonics and/or sight words

– Discrete if it is the lowest level skill on which the staff are intervening because the requisite skills are there, but the student needs practice for speed

Page 16: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring Graphs

Plotting Baseline Data Points

Page 17: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Plotting Baseline Data Points

Student A--0, 5, 3– What is the median score?– Where do you plot it on the graph?

Student B—25, 20, 23 What is the median score?– What is the median score?– Where do you plot it on the graph?

Student C—0, 0, 10– What is the median score?– Where do you plot it on the graph?

Page 18: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 19: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 20: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 21: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Setting Goals and Drawing Aimlines

Documentation•Graphs•Tier 3: Level IIIc

Page 22: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Goals: What should we use?

Where would we like the student’s skills to beat the end of the designated interventionperiod? Considerations:• Is the skill a building block to higher level

skills?• Is the skill discrete or complex? • Is it likely to take more or less time and/or

intensity to bring the skills up to proficiency?

Page 23: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Types of Goals

1. District (NHCS) Norms

2. Growth Rates• NHCS Data - Can be done for any skill, any

grade level for which norm data is available

3. Minimum Celeration Finder

4. Class Norms

5. District Behavior Standards

Page 24: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

1. Using District Norms

Goals are selected from the norms tables by grade level. The norms tables are located in the Special Education and Related Services manual on the web.

Often the Proficiency standard is chosen, but there are times when that is too ambitious for a student and the Well Below Proficiency standard is used instead.

Page 25: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

1. Using District Norms

Goals should be selected to represent the next season usually Winter norms when interventions start in the Fall and Spring norms when interventions start in the Winter.– Fall (Beginning of Year – November)– Winter (December – February)– Spring (March – End of Year)

Page 26: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Plotting Baselines, Goals and Aimlines

Student A--0, 5, 3 (Grade 6, Vocabulary, Fall to Winter)– District Norm - 18 (Proficient for Winter)

– Analysis of Assessment Plan

Page 27: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 28: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Plotting Baselines, Goals and Aimlines

Student B— 25, 20, 23 (Grade 6, Reading Mazes, Winter to Spring)– District Norm - 40 (Proficient for Spring)

Analysis of Assessment Plan

Page 29: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 30: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

2. Growth Rate: Using Growth Rate to Set a Goal

• Gives you a growth expectancy for each week of school year

• Allows for obtaining student’s baseline then monitoring progress while comparing to growth expectancy.

• Determine the number of weeks of intervention.

• Multiply the calculated growth rate by number of weeks of intervention

• Add to baseline median.

Page 31: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

2. Growth Rate Calculations: Fall to Spring

– Grade 6, Reading Comprehension (Proficient)– Spring Norm minus Fall Norm, divided by 20

weeks– 40- 30/ 20 = 0.5 words per week – For this reading comprehension measure,

students are acquiring about 0.5 words per week, thus if a intervention plan is for six weeks then the student should acquire a about 3 words in the six weeks

Page 32: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Plotting Baselines, Goals and Aimlines

Student B— 25, 20, 23 (Grade 6, Paragraph, Winter to Spring)– Growth Rate - 0.5 words/wk over 4 weeks is 2– Add 2 to the Median– Goal is 25

Analysis of Assessment Plan

Page 33: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

3. Minimum Celeration Finder

Celeration rates from the Precision Teaching program can be used for goal setting consideration

The lines on the overlay indicate different celeration slopes or rates of progress

Depending on how ambitious the team wants the goal to be different rates of progress can be used

Page 34: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Minimum Celeration

Page 35: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

4. Classroom Norms: Why?

You may choose to norm a class or grade level on a probe that was not used for state or local norming. This is most likely to be done when probes representing skills from previous grade levels need to be used to determine entitlement.

To do class or grade level norms, the school must:– Give the probe(s) to the entire group,– Administer each probe 3 times in a week.

You will probably want to do this Fall, Winter and Spring.

Page 36: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

4. Classroom Norms: How do you get one?

To do class or grade level norms, the school must:– Give the chosen probe(s) to a sample that is

representative of the school populationIn a school with heterogeneous grouping, the

student’s classroom will doIn a school with homogeneous grouping you

may have to balance out the student’s classroom with another or even norm the entire grade

– Administer each probe 3 times in a week.

Page 37: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

4. Classroom Norms: How do you get one?

Once you have the class or grade level data– Add all the students’ scores for all 3 days

together.– Compute the Mean score by dividing by the

total of the students’ scores by the total number of probe administrations. Ex. 3 administrations with 25 students

would equal a divisor of 75. You may want to do a mean for more than one

season: Fall and Winter, Winter and Spring

Page 38: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

4. Using Classroom Norms

Setting Goals: – Class or Grade Level Mean– Minimum Celeration Finder

Determining Whether a Student’s Skills are Discrepant After Intervention:– Divide the class or grade level Mean by the

Median of the Student’s last 3 data points.– Class Mean ÷ Student’s Median ≥ 2

Page 39: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Computing Two Times Discrepant

Ex. Class Mean is 40. Student Median is 20. 40 ÷ 20 = 2

Student is discrepant.

Non Ex. Class Mean is 40. Student Median is 22.

40 ÷ 22 = 1.89

Student is not discrepant.

Page 40: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring

Page 41: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring: Why?

Time and cost efficient Sensitive to changes over short periods of

time Frequent and repeated data collection

(dependent upon student’s level/tier) and analysis of student performance

Use data to inform instruction in specific skills.

Page 42: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring

How does it differ from collection of baseline data?– Use alternative probes with the baseline probe

included as the cycle of alternative probes allows.– For probes such as blends or sight words, you

may start at the line after the last line used on the third baseline probe or use alternative probe.

– Alternate probes have been sent to Interventionists and PSM contact persons. We are still working on alternatives for Grade 8 Reading Mazes.

Page 43: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring: When?

• Tier 1 including differentiated instruction: • May use ClassScapes, Reading or Math

Assessment, Progress Monitoring materials as part of standard protocol intervention program, Probes, etc.

• Generally less frequent or even pre-intervention and post-intervention.

Page 44: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Progress Monitoring: When?

• Tier 2: • Grade Level Probes Normed by the County, • At least two probe areas • Recommend weekly progress monitoring

• Tier 3:• Grade Level Probes Normed by the County, • At least two probe areas • Minimum of 5 times per 2 week period.

Page 45: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Type of Progress Monitoring

NHCS

Tier 1Depends on Intervention Plan

Evaluation Design

Tier 2 aDepends on

Intervention Plan Evaluation Design

Tier 2bNormed

Probes in 2 Areas:

Page 46: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Frequency of Progress Monitoring

NHCS

Tier 1Depends on Intervention Plan

Evaluation Design

Tier 2 aDepends on

Intervention Plan Evaluation Design

Tier 2bEvery Other Day

Page 47: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

DECISION-MAKING RULES AND REVISIONS OF

HYPOTHESES/INTERVENTIONS

How do we know when to change the intervention?

Page 48: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Decision-making rules: What type of skill is involved?

Discrete Skills such as blends, sight recognition, fluency:– Consider 3 to 4 below the line to change

hypothesis/intervention– 4 to 6 above the line to raise goal and aimline or

discontinue (at Proficiency level) and move on the next skill in the hierarchy

Page 49: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Decision-making rules: What type of skill is involved?

Complex Skill Sets such as fluency, vocabulary, reading comprehension, math, written expression, etc:– Consider how many days/weeks it might take to

show improvement or be certain skill is developed Given probe administration 5 times in two weeks:

How many data points below the line should be considered before changing hypothesis/intervention?

How many data points above the line should be considered before changing the goal or considering a change back to Tier 1 or 2?

Page 50: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

REVISIONS OF HYPOTHESES/INTERVENTIONS

How do you know what to change?

Page 51: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

REVISIONS OF HYPOTHESES/INTERVENTIONS

• Intervention Intensity (Amount of Time, Size of Group)• Does the data show progress toward the goal?

• Intervention Strategy/Hypothesis• Does the data NOT show progress toward the

goal?

Page 52: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Graphing Progress Monitoring and Revisions of Hypotheses/Interventions

Tier 3e

Page 53: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Graphs

Student A– Baseline 0, 5, 3– Week 1 3, 1, 6– Week 2 4, 5– Week 3 6, 6, 7– Week 4 9, 15,15

What does this data tell you? Would you change the hypothesis/intervention? If so, how? If not, why?

Showing revisions

Page 54: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 55: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Graphs: Progress Monitoring

Student B– Baseline 25, 20, 23 – Week 1 19,18, 19– Week 2 17, 19, 20

What does this data tell you? Would you change the hypothesis/intervention? If so, when and how? If not, why?

Page 56: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Graphs: Progress Monitoring

– Week 3 30, 33– Week 4 40, 45, 50

What hypotheses would you have about the improvement given the choices you made at the end of Week 2?

Showing Revisions

Page 57: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment
Page 58: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Is the Student Making Sufficient Progress toward the Goal?

•Student Growth Rates•Trend lines

Page 59: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Growth Rate: Computing the Growth Rate for an Individual Student

Median of Last 3 Data Points minus Median Score at Baseline

Divide by the number of weeks of intervention. Do not count weeks when intervention was not

delivered or monitored at all: Vacation, Illness or Weather-related

Student A: 15 – 3 divided by 4 = 3 wds/wk Student B: 45 – 23 divided by 4 = 5.5 wds/wk

Page 60: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Trend lines: How Do They Show Growth?

Line that you draw through a series of data points that represents the student’s actual rate of progress

If the trend line slope is flatter than the aimline, then adjust intervention

If the trend line slope is steeper than the aimline then adjust goal or area of intervention

If the slopes are the same make no change.

Page 61: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Trend Line Procedures: Can be done in Excel

- Draw a horizontal line through median of first half of data – form an intersection with vertical line

– Draw a horizontal line through median of second half of data – form an intersection with vertical line

– Connect the two intersections– Make your decision, is it the same

decision?

Page 62: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Trend Lines and Entitlement Criteria

Used to determine how long it will be before the student’s skills are likely to be proficient– Required for Behavior Entitlement– Now an option for Academics as well

Page 63: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Academic Alternative for Performance Well Below Peers

– In academics, can add student’s current growth rate to the median of the last 3 data points to determine how many weeks it will take the student to meet proficiency standards.

Page 64: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Example: Short Term Intervention Needed

Student is in Grade 6 and is receiving intervention in reading fluency

On 3/1/10, the median of the last 3 data points for the student is 105

The student’s growth rate is 4.5 words per week The Proficiency standard for Spring is 162 In 12 weeks, the student is likely to have reached

proficiency on this probe:– 162 – 105 = 57– 57 / 4.5 = 12

Page 65: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Example: Long-term Intervention Needed

Student is in Grade 6 and is receiving intervention in reading fluency

On 3/1/10, the median of the last 3 data points for the student is 105

The student’s growth rate is 1.5 words/week The student will need 38 weeks to become proficient

– 162– 105 = 57– 57 / 1.5 = 38

By that time the student will be into the next school year and, possibly, in the next grade level with even more difficult reading passages to master.

Page 66: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

WHAT DOES THE DATA SHOW?

Comparison to peers, e.g. normative data– Is the student above or below the Well Below

Proficient, Proficient or Mean for academics– Has the student met behavior goals?– How long will it take the student to reach the

proficiency goal given his/her current growth rate?

Page 67: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

WHAT DOES THE DATA SHOW?

Growth rate and trend lines– How does the growth rate compare to students in the

normed sample at the Well Below Proficient, Proficient or Mean standards?

– When does the trend line indicate that the student is going to achieve proficiency?

AcademicBehavior—75 percent or 100 percent

Page 68: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Additional Training

10/18/10 Tiers 3 & 4 (102)

11/09/10 IEPs, Exit Criteria, and Reevaluations (102)

12/13/10 Behavior Data Collection (102)

Page 69: PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation  Curriculum Based Assessment

Nancy Kreykenbohm, Ph.D.

Coordinator, PSM/RtI Program

School Psychologist Level III

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 910-616-3382