RPT ON MAG & IP SUR

42Ae6NE0288 2 .11290 CARMAN 010

REPORT ON MAGNETOMETER

AND INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYS

CARMAN AND LANGMUIR TWPS. PROPERTY

N.T.S. 42-A-6GOLDEN PHEASANT RESOURCES LTD.

VOLUME 2 - GEOPHYSICS

Porcupine Mining Division

Ontario

48022'N Latitude 81 003'W Longitude

RECEIVED

JUN B 1988

SECtiON

April, 1988 R.E. Cillick, M.Sc.

ROBERT E. GILLICK AND ASSOCIATES LTD.

for JAMES WADE ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE OF42Ae6NE026e 2.11290 CARMAN

Page1.0 SUMMARY l

2.0 INTRODUCTION 2

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, LOCATION AND ACCESS 2

Figure No. l - Location Map 3

Figure No. 2 - Claim Sketch 4

A.O TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION 5

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK 5

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND ECONOMIC MINERALIZATION 6

7.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY 8

8.0 DESCRIPTION OF GEOPHYSICAL PROGRAM 9

9.0 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION 11

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16

11.0 REFERENCES 18

010C

APPENDICES

A CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

B TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

C IP PSEUDOSECTIONS

Back of report

tt it

II

II

II

II

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

LIST OF DRAWINGS

DRAWING No. 1: IP PSEUDOSECTION - LINE 2 S

DRAWING No. 2: IP PSEUDOSECTION - LINE l N

DRAWING No. 3: IP PSEUDOSECTION - LINE 3 N







DRAWING No.10: IP PSEUDOSECTION - LINE 14 N



DRAWING No.13: IP PSEUDOSECTION - LINE 17 NDRAWING No.14: IP COMPILATION MAP

DRAWING No.15: CONTOURED TOTAL FIELD MAGNETICS

DRAWING No.16: POSTED TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC VALUES

APPENDIXit

ii

n

H

n

n

n

11

H

n

n

n

C11

It

II

tt

tt

II

11

II

It

II

It

t!

in map pocket n H n

1.0 SUMMARY

Eight chargeability anomalies selected from the IP results

are interpreted as representing sulfide zones with potential

for gold mineralization. At least one of the zones (line 16 N,

0+45 W S line 17 N, 0+65 W) may be related to iron formation.

Other zones are located within mafic to intermediate volcanics

and may represent sulfide emplacement associated with faulting

or shearing.

The magnetics survey has delineated a northeast striking ridge

of high magnetic response located near the new baseline. The

feature is believed to represent iron formation. A linear

north-south striking magnetic low, interpreted as a fault,

appears to terminate or offset the iron formation at its

northern extremity.

Trenching or drilling of selected IP anomalous zones is re

commended. In addition, it is highly recommended that the

magnetic trend interpreted as iron formation be thoroughly in

vestigated on surface. If the presence of iron formation is

confirmed, the zone should be prospected and drilled.

l 2.0 INTRODUCTION

The following report describes ground geophysical surveys (induced polarization and magnetics) carried out during March and April, 1988, over parts of the Carman and Langmuir Property of Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd. in the Timmins area of northern Ontario.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Golden Pheasant property consists of a block of 36 con tiguous unpatented mining claims located approximately 25 kilometres southeast of the municipality of Timmins in northern Ontario. The claim block is located near the southwest corner of Carman Township and northwest corner of Langmuir Township (Fig. No. 1).

The claims comprising the property are as follows (Fig. No. 2):

Claim Number Recording DateP 792475 - 792477 (3) March 12, 1984P 792481 - 792484 (4) March 29, 1984P 947051 - 947060 (10) September 16, 1986P 947114 - 947121 (8) September 16, 1986P 987235 - 987245 (11) May 26, 1987

Total 36 Claims

The property is accessible by an all-season gravel road from the town of South Porcupine located on highway 101 to the north, By proceeding southeastwards along the gravel road for about 18 kilometres and then taking the Langmuir Mine branch road for an additional 5 kilometres, one passes within about 700 metres of the southern part of the Golden Pheasant property. From this point, the claims are accessible on foot or by snow machine.

The property can also be reached by helicopter from Timmins.

- 3 -

fc

South Porcupine

, TimminsG01DCN

PHEASANT

LEGEND". \Provincial Highway -———————-Secondary Road ———————Township Line - —— — — —District Boundary —— --—- * —River, Stream —-...*-* ^--.x--.

10 15 20 Km.

GOLDEN PHEASANT RESOURCES LTD

PROPERTY LOCATION

MAP

ROBERT E GILLICK A ASSOCIATES LTD

BY: RGDATE: Apf/SCALE:!.***,*'"

90723* 1

* i"O* ---9.727,-j-

1

1. ——————— —— - -J- .

11

4- 4- -9*70*4^ 9470MT'

1 1

......,, .... 1 4- -792477) 79247*' 79247f'

111

. . - -— . ..... . ~l m m— m ——— l-

1

1

1

1 i

907217

^tZ 907242

907240 "" F07245

— ——..— — — — -L — — — -. 907218 907239J 907244

.

l 1947059 9470*0 907249

'

1

,..^ r 9470ft

"t

. i . .M. . . ~

1 j ____ —J— — — — -h— — — -f — ~~ ~~ ~\ — - ————— — ' —— ' —— 7 147ff* j

l |

| |N Lj i

X\ A """ \^\s LJf |

^^ ls^ 1N \\

KXN iv\ i

^ .^..Langmuir Mine ' ^ ( 25 Km,)

.5 0 1.0 Km.

Y-47//7

— — — "194 7/2,0 i

1

947/Xfl

— ——— i —— ——— —

CARMEN TwpLANGMUIR Twp

/2/flf?^ 's

At^JdLKc*''GOLDEN PHEASANT RESOURCES LTD

CLAIM SKETCH

I BV: RG DATE: Apr/ SB

- . . .... ... . .... .SCALE: l". 20. 000IOWQ.NP: 2

l't

l

- 5 -

No bodies of water large enough to permit the landing and

take-off of ski- or float-equipped fixed-wing aircraft occur

on the property.

4.0 TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION

Approximately 6(^ to 70/5 of the property area is low-lying and

covered by swamp or muskeg. Over the remainder of the property,

topographic relief is variable ranging from several metres to

a maximum of about 20 metres. The relief is relatively abrupt

in places especially over diabase dikes where differential

weathering has left the hard dike rock prominently exposed.

Vegetation is generally mixed. Cedar is common in the swampy

areas with black spruce -and balsam fir occurring in the regions

of muskeg. Stands of birch, poplar and pine occur along the

ridges and in the dryer parts of the property.

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK

Although no documented evidence is available in assessment files

indicating work on the Golden Pheasant property prior to the

1960's, old pits and trenches located on the property suggest

that some work may have been carried out.

In 1962, Dumont Nickel Corporation of Quebec, drilled a single

hole (602') on the property in the west central part of present

claim 792481. The hole reportedly intersected several bands

of siliceous pyrite-bearing iron formation. One of the bands

assayed 0.67 ounces gold per ton over a core length of 6 feet.

In 1974, T. K. Dowe drilled a single hole (146 1 ) in the north

east corner of present claim 792481. Banded iron formation

was intersected near the bottom of the hole. No significant

gold assays were reported.

- 6 -

In 1982, Rio Tinto Canadian Exploration Ltd. carried out

magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys over the southern part of the

present property. One hole was drilled to a depth of 372 feet

in the east central part of present claim 792482, The hole

reportedly intersected several bands of siliceous iron forma

tion well-mineralized (5-1051) with pyrrhotite and pyrite and

containing up to several percent chalcopyrite in places. No

gold assays were published for this hole.

In 1984/85, J.K. Filo and M. C. Kean staked seven claims co

vering and surrounding the Dumont drill hole. VLF-EM surveying

and geological mapping were carried out.

In 1986, Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd. optioned the Filo-Kean

claims. During the latter part of 1986 and early part of 1987,

29 additional claims were staked contiguous to the original

block to form the present 36 claims. During the early part of

1987, Golden Pheasant commissioned geophysical surveying (HLEM,

magnetometer, IP) and geological mapping over the southern

25 claims of the block.

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND ECONOMIC MINERALIZATION

The Timmins area lies within the Abitibi Volcanic Belt which

forms a sub-province of the Superior Province of the Canadian

Shield. The belt is characterized by a predominance of Archean

metavolcanic/metasedimentary rock types intruded by numerous

felsic to ultramafic bodies. Six major gold/base metal mining

camps are located along this belt making it one of the most

productive mining regions in the world.

The Timmins area is located near the western extremity of the

Abitibi Belt. Volcanic rocks within this sub-region have

been divided into the Tisdale and Deloro groups. The Tisdale

group consists of a basal formation of predominantly ultra-

r ~t - 7 -

mafic volcanic rocks (komatiites) overlying tholeiitic basalts

which in turn are overlain by volcaniclastic rocks of calc-

alkaline dacite composition. The Deloro group is composed of

andesitic and basaltic flows overlain by dacitic flows and

and dacitic and rhyolitic pyroclastics. Iron formation com

monly occurs near the top of the Deloro sequence. Both groups

are overlain by interlayered and intercalated metasediments

consisting of wacke, siltstone and, to a lesser extent, conglo

merate. The regional metamorphic grade is lower to middle

greenschist facies. Both groups have been intruded by numerous

north and north-east trending diabase dikes.

The Destor-Porcupine Fault forms a major structural break in

the Timmins area striking northeasterly between the Tisdale

group and the Deloro group. The vast majority of gold deposits

in the area are hosted in the lower volcanic rocks of the

Tisdale sequence immediately to the north of the Destor-Porcu

pine Fault.

The Shaw Dome forms the main structural feature associated with

the Deloro volcanic group. The easterly dip and northerly

strike of the rocks on the Golden Pheasant property are due to

their location along the eastern margin of the Shaw Dome.

Over 49 gold mines have operated in the Timmins area producing

a combined total of 65 million ounces of gold from ore with an

average grade of 0.254 ounces gold per ton. The majority of

gold in the Timmins camp has been hosted in quartz-carbonate

veins within volcanic rocks in the lower part of the Tisdale

sequence. Most of the deposits are in close spatial association

with ultramafic volcanic rocks suggesting that this latter rock

type may have been the source rock for the gold.

Two iron formation hosted gold deposits are located within the

Deloro volcanics about 2.5.kilometres northwest of the Golden

- 8, -

Pheasant property. The Carshaw and Malga deposits are re

ported to host 247,000 tons of ore with a combined average

grade of 0.249 ounces gold per ton. Gold mineralization in

both these deposits is associated with quartz veining and

attendant pyrite replacement of magnetite-rich mesobands. The

mineralization appears to have been emplaced by the percolation

and precipitation of exotic gold and sulfur bearing hydrother

mal solutions within fracture systems formed by the brittle

deformation of the iron formation. ;

The Langmuir Mine, a former nickel producer, is located about

2.5 kilometres southeast of the Golden Pheasant property.

Between 1973 and 1977, 1.1 million tons of ore grading l.5%

nickel were mined from this ultramafic hosted deposit.

7.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The southeast portion of the Golden Pheasant property is under

lain by ultramafic intrusive rock identified as serpentinized

dunite or peridotite. Most of the western and northern parts

of the 1987 gridded portion of the property are underlain by

intermediate volcanics intercalated with thin mafic flows.

Several outcrops of quartz-feldspar-porphry occur in the west

near line 1+00 N at approximately 10+00 W. A large east-west

trending carbonatized zone has been identified at 0+25 S, 4+00 W,

Large diabase intrusives transect the property in both northerly

and northeasterly directions.

Two zones of siliceous oxide iron formation were delineated

during the 1987 mapping program. One zone is located between

lines 1+00 N and 2+00 N at 1+50 W and the second zone strikes

northeasterly across lines 5+00 N and 6+00 N at 9+00 E. The

iron formation is reported to exhibit intense local folding and

contain variable quantities of sulfide mineralization. The

hole drilled by Dumont in 1962 intersected the western zone of

- 9 -

iron formation indicating it to be composed of two separate

bands, the westernmost band being auriferous and 'well-mineral

ized 1 with pyrite.

8.C DESCRIPTION OF GEOPHYSICAL PROGRAM

Between the dates of March 3 and March 30, 1988, inclusive,

23.95 kilometres (14.89 miles) of line were cut over 11 claims

comprising the northern part of the Golden Pheasant property.

A baseline oriented at an azimuth of 34" was cut across the

central part of the claim group and crosslines oriented per

pendicular to the baseline were cut at 100 metre intervals to

cover the claims. Labelled pickets were erected at 25 metre

intervals along all crosslines and the baseline.

The linecutting was carried out by Mr. N. Wabie of Notre Dame

du Nord, Quebec.

Between the dates of March 10 and April 4, 1988, inclusive,

magnetometer and induced polarization surveying was carried

out on the property by Robert E. Gillick S Associates Ltd. of

North Bay, Ontario. Total mileages surveyed were as follows:

Magnetometer survey 20.16 kilometres

IP survey ' 10.50 " (n-1 to 4).65 " (n-1 to 6)

The personnel involved in the geophysical surveys were:

R. E. Gillick North Bay, Ont. March 10 - April 4

P. Butler North Bay, Ont. March 10 - March 27

T. Howe North Bay, Ont. March 10 - March 27

The magnetometer survey was carried-,out exclusively on the

newly cut grid lines covering the 11 northern claims of the

property. The survey was performed using two EDA OMNI IV

- 10 -

proton precession magnetometers with memory capability. One magnetometer was used as a recording basestation unit to mon itor drift/diurnal changes while the other was used to take field readings along the grid lines. The instruments were syn chronized each day prior to commencement of the survey. The basestation magnetometer was set up at a fixed location near the survey area and programmed to take readings at one minute intervals. The 'roving 1 magnetometer was used to take readings of the total magnetic field at 25 or 12.5 metre intervals along the grid lines. At the end of each survey day, the two instru ments were interfaced and field data was automatically correct ed and dumped.

The IP survey was performed using an EDA IP-2 time-domain re ceiver in conjunction with a Phoenix l kilowatt IPT-1 trans mitter. A two second on/off reversing polarity transmitted waveform was employed.

The survey was carried out using the dipole-dipole electrode array with an a-spacing of 25 metres. Dipole separations of n s l to 4 were used on all lines surveyed except line 2 S where readings were taken at separations of n* l to 6. The IP coverage included parts of both the old and the new grids. The lines read were as follows:

Old (1987)grid -

Line 2 S 6+25 W to 0+25 ELine l N 5+50 W to 7+25 ELine 3 N 4+25 W to 10+25 ELine 5 N 3+75 W to 2+50 ELine 6 N 2+50 W to 3+75 ELine 7 N 1+75 W to 11+00 ELine 8 N 1+25 W to 4+25 ELine 9 N 0+75 W to 11+75 E

New (1988) grid -

Line 12 N 3+25 W to 3+00 ELine 14 N 4+50 W to 3+00 ELine 15 N 5+50 W to 0+25 ELine 16 N 5+50 W to 5+75 ELine 17 N 2+75 W to 1+00 E

- li -

The coverages indicated above are determined by the stations occupied by current or potential electrodes at the extremities of the surveyed portion of each line. The line coverage of the IP survey totalled 11.15 kilometres over a period of 13.5 pro duction days, giving an average coverage of 826 metres per day. Although noise levels were generally low during the survey al lowing relatively rapid reading times, survey speed was hamper ed somewhat due to difficulties encountered with electrode em placement in areas of frozen swamp and outcrop.

9.0 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

a) Induced Polarization Results:

The results of the induced polarization survey are presented in pseudosection form in Drawings l through 13. A compilation of the IP anomalies picked is shown in Drawing 14.

The IP anomalies have been categorized as follows:

i) DEFINITE BEDROCK ANOMALY

This is an anomaly which has a known geological source as proven by drilling and/or surface geology, OR, an anomaly whose signature and correlation with other geophysical and/or geological data indicate a bedrock source even though the exact nature of the source is unknown.

ii) PROBABLE BEDROCK ANOMALY

This is an anomaly whose signature OR correlation with other geophysical/geological data suggest a bedrock source.

iii) POSSIBLE BEDROCK ANOMALY

This category includes generally low amplitude char geability anomalies with poor signatures and weak or nil correlation with other data.

- 12 -

A line by line description of the induced polarization results

follows:

Line 2 S (Drawing No. 1) -

A strong, sharp chargeability anomaly centred at 5+10 W cor

relates with a mineralized zone of iron formation intersected

by a Rio Tinto diamond drill hole in 1982. According to the

log for this hole, the zone had a drill indicated thickness of

3.25 metres and contained up to 3 5% magnetite and 1555 sulfides.

A low resistivity anomaly immediately to the east of the char

geable zone suggests a fault may be present.

A generally weak although well-formed chargeability response

centred at 2+70 W has been drill-proven (1962 S 1988) to repre

sent a zone of silicified iron formation containing up to 20%

sulfides over a core length of 1.65 metres. The 1962 drill re

sults also suggested this zone to be auriferous.

Line l N (Drawing No. 2) -

A weak chargeability anomaly centred at 1+80 W and associated

with an apparent resistivity high may represent a continuation

of the sulfidized zone located on line 2 S at 2+70 W. The as

sociated resistivity high may indicate silicification.

A moderate amplitude chargeability response centred at 6+20 E,

is located over a region mapped as felsic to intermediate vol

canics near the contact with ultramafic intrusive rocks. The

anomaly may represent a zone of disseminated sulfides. The

weak resistivity high associated with the chargeability anoma

ly may indicate silicification.

Line 3 N (Drawing No. '3) -

Three moderate amplitude chargeability peaks appearing to cor

relate with resistivity highs are located between 0+00 and

1+50 W. The anomalies may be related to an inferred diabase

dike interpreted from ground magnetics to strike northwards

through this area. Sulfide mineralization along dike contacts

- 13 -

or sulfide/magnetite mineralization within the dike rock could be the chargeable source.

A moderate amplitude chargeability anomaly is centred at 6+60 W. Again, this anomaly appears to be related to diabase. A flanking resistivity low immediately to the west of the chargeability peak may represent a fault.

A broad strong chargeability response at the eastern end of the line is due to serpentinized ultramafic rocks in this area.

Line 5 N (Drawing No. 4) -A double-peaked (na 3,4) chargeability anomaly in the vicinity of 3+00 W appears to be associated with a northeasterly trend ing diabase dike. Sulfide/magnetite mineralization along the dike contacts or within the dike rock itself may be the charg eable source.

Line 6 N (Drawing No. 5) -

A weak chargeability peak centred at 0+75 W and associated with a high resistivity appears to correlate with a diabase- volcanic contact. The chargeability response may be due to sulfide mineralization along the contact.

A moderate amplitude chargeability anomaly centred at 0+90 E correlates with a resistivity low flanking a resistivity high to the east. The response may be due to a zone of sulfide min eralization within the volcanics. The associated resistivity low suggests a fault may be flanking the chargeable zone.

Line 7 N (Drawing No. 6) -A weak chargeability response centred at 0+70 E is associated with a resistivity low. The anomaly may represent a zone of weak sulfide mineralization along a fault or shear.

Moderate amplitude chargeability anomalies centred at 2+70 E, 3+60 E, 4+85 E and 9+10 E are all associated with strong resis tivity highs and are interpreted as zones of elevated sulfide

- 1A -

or magnetite content within a broad easterly striking diabase dike inferred from ground magnetics and geological mapping to underlie most of the eastern half of line 7 N.


A weak to moderate amplitude chargeability anomaly centred at 1+35 E exhibits flanking correlation with a resistivity low to the east. The response may indicate a zone of weak sulfide mineralization flanking a fault or shear.

A moderate amplitude chargeability anomaly centred at 2-1-45 E is associated with a strong resistivity high. The response may represent a zone of disseminated sulfide mineralization within mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks.


Two moderate amplitude chargeability anomalies located at the eastern end of the line and associated with a broad resistivity high may represent zones of sulfide/magnetite mineralization within diabase or at the contact of diabase and volcanic rock.f


A weak chargeability response centred at 0+70 E is associated with a moderate amplitude well-formed high resistivity anomaly. The zone is located within a region mapped as mafic to inter mediate volcanics. The high chargeability - high resistivity combination is similar to the response over the sulfidized and silicified zone located at 2+70 W on line 2 S. A similar geo logical source may be present on line 12 N.

A moderate amplitude chargeability response centred at 2+00 E and associated with a strong resistivity high is believed to correlate with diabase. A zone of disseminated sulfide or mag netite within the dike or at the dike contact may be the causa tive source.

- 15 -


Two weak poorly-formed chargeability anomalies centred at

3+55 W and 0+45 W correlate with linear magnetic features be

lieved to represent a. diabase dike and iron formation, respectively


Two unusual anomalies are present on this line. A weak charg

eability anomaly centred at 3+75 Wand responsive on n" 1,2

only, is accompanied by sharp low resistivities on n"3,4. The

higher chargeabilities may be due to weak sulfide or magnetite

mineralization in the upper part of a diabase dike which is in

dicated to strike northwards through this area by the ground

magnetics. The low resistivities may indicate the presence of

of a fault along the dike contact. The sharpness of the resis

tivity low at n z 4 is unusual. A second chargeability anomaly

centred at 2+25 W is expressed as an extremely sharp negative

chargeability on n 8*!^. There is no associated resistivity an

omaly. The chargeability response is similar to that which

may occur over a buried wire or pipe. Alternatively, the res

ponse could be due to a very shallow vein of sulfide of very

limited depth extent.

Line 16 N Drawing No. 12) -

A single anomaly centred at 0+45 W has been located on this

line. The chargeability response is unusually shaped consist

ing of a sharp positive peak flanked to the east by a low zone

of abnormally noisy readings. The resistivity data indicates

a contrast suggesting a contact. The zone is associated with

a sharp strong linear magnetic feature on a northeasterly strike.

The zone may represent sulfidized iron formation along a geo

logic contact.


A weak chargeability response centred at 0+65 W is associated

with a dipolar magnetic anomaly. The response may be due to

if 1

l

- 1.6 -

weak sulfides associated with lean iron formation.

b) Magnetometer Survey Results:

The contoured results of the magnetometer survey on the newly

cut grid covering the northern part of the Golden Pheasant

property are presented on Drawing No. 15.

A strong narrow magnetic linear srtiking northwards near the

western boundary of the property is believed to represent a

diabase dike.

Regions of active magnetics in the eastern and northern parts

of the property are believed to be underlain by ultramafic

intrusive rocks perhaps accompanied by diabase intrusions.

A strong narrow magnetic linear on a northeasterly strike near

the grid baseline is interpreted to be iron formation. The

feature exhibits an apparent strike length of at least 600

metres extending-from line 13 N to line 19 N. A narrow magne

tic low trending northwards from line 14 N at 3+25 E to line

22 N at 3+25 W may represent a fault or shear which has ter

minated or displaced the interpreted iron formation.

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A number of zones of anomalous chargeability have been located

on the Golden Pheasant property. More than half of these

zones appear to be associated with diabase dikes and are not

considered to warrant further work at this time. The char

geable zones not associated with diabase may contain sulfide

mineralization emplaced along faults or shears. Several of

these latter zones correlate with weak to moderate resistivity

highs suggesting that silicification may be present. Three

chargeable zones located near the baseline of the new grid may

be associated with iron formation.

- 17 -

The following IP zones are considered to have potential for gold mineralization and should be investigated by trenching

or diamond drilling:

a) Line l N, 1+80 W

b) Line 6 N, 0+90 E

c) Line 7 N, 0+70 E

d) Line 8 N, 1+35 E and 2+45 E

e) Line 12 N, 0+70 E

f) Line 16 N, 0+45 W

g) Line 17 N, 0+65 W

In addition to delineating a diabase dike near the western

boundary of the property and magnetically active regions in the north and east parts of the grid, believed to be underlain by

ultramafic intrusive rocks, the magnetics survey has defined

a narrow northeast striking magnetic linear, located near the grid baseline, which may be iron formation. This latter trend

extends from line 13 N to line 19 N where it appears to be

fault terminated or offset. Since iron formation is known to host gold mineralization on the property, it is recommended that this zone be thoroughly investigated on the surface and,

if the presence of iron formation is confirmed, the zone should be diamond drilled.

Respectfully submitted,

R. E. Gillick, M.Se.ROBERT E. GILLICK S ASSOCIATES LTD.

for

JAMES WADE ENGINEERING LTD.

- 18 -

11.0 REFERENCES

D. R. Pyke, 1982, OGS Report 219, Geology of the Timmins Area, District of Cochrane.

S. A. Ferguson, 1968, ODM Geological Report 58, Geology and Ore Deposits of Tisdale Township.

J. A. Fyon, J. H. Crocket, H. P. Schwarcz, 1983, The Carshaw and Malga Iron-Formation-Hosted Gold Deposits of the Timmins Area, in OGS Misc. Paper 110 - The Geology of Gold in Ontario.

C. J. Hodgson, 1983, The Structure and Geological Development of the Porcupine Camp - A Re-Evaluation, in, OGS Mise Paper 110 - The Geology of Gold in Ontario.

R. W. Stevenson, 1987, Geological Report on the Carman fi Langmuir Townships Property, Porcupine Mining Division for Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

G. Hodges,1987, A Report on the Total Field Magnetics Survey on the Carman and Langmuir Townships Property of Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

,'

G. Hodges, 1987, A Report on the Electromagnetic and Induced Polarization Surveys on the Carman and Langmuir Townships Property of Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

A. Moore, 1987, Geological Report on the Property of Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd. in Langmuir and Carman Townships, Porcupine Mining Division.

R. J. Anderson, personal communication.

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

l

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

This is to certify that:

1) I ara a consulting geophysicist with an office at 114 Willingdon Drive, North Bay, Ontario.

2) I hold a BSc.in Mathematics from Dalhousie Universityand an MSc. Diploma in Applied Geophysics (1979) fromMcGill University.

3) I have been working in the Mineral Exploration and Mining Industry for the past 13 years.

4) I am an associate member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

5) I have no direct or indirect interest in the property described in this report.

Dated at North Bay, Ontario, this 2 " d ay of A?x?X

R. E. Gillick.

APPENDIX B

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

AssessmentWorkBreakdown

1. Type of Survey ...,.

2. Township or Area ...J^3royir.aDd.Car.man.-...

3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey

A17.0A2. . . . . . . .947054 947059 987238

947055 947060 .9.8.7.239

U. Number of Miles of Line Cut ..

*5. Number of Stations Established -.

*6. Make and type bf Instrument Used

*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity ...

*8. Frequency Used and Power Output .

Flown

i i

9. Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)

Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting etc.)

Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days ...................

Calculation

54.5 x 7 381.5Technical Line-cutting

This is a fraction of a survey done on claims involving several recorded owners.

Number of claims

Assessment credits per claim

The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the limits of the above listed claims il Check If otherwise, please explain . .........

Dated: Signed

Note: (A) * Complete only if applicable.(B) Complete l ist of names, addresses and dates on reverse side,(C) Submit separate breakdown for each type of survey.CD) Submit i n duplicate.

Type of Work Name 6 Address Daces WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

. OWN. CW V. AW*....

CONSULTANTS

""~~~ " Number of Kame 6 Address Dates Worked (specify In field or office) 8 hour days

6....FJSW........... .......

.........A*IL........OCOce......... JL51....

DRAUGHTSMAN. TYPING. OTHERS (specify)

Number of Name 6 Address Type of Work Dates Worked 8 hour days

....April.22Jfc,.U...............................,.3;?5....

TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS S4.S- - -

LINE-CUTTING

Number of Name Address Dates Worked 8 hour days

TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS

APPENDIX C

IP PSEUDOSECTIONS

2 + OO W /+OO W O+OO 1 + O

APPARENTL ———— i ____ ____ i ———— t ———— i ———— ———— i ———— i —— . — i ———— i ———— i ———— i ———— i ————

0 E 2+OO E

CHARGEABILITY (MSEC.)1

•o

•l

—3

—Z '-l

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (OHM-M)

• 124 - /36 - 198 '112 -I4O

'191 .I9O -201

•244250

250 250 .SK .SK

yARAMfiTERS

: DIPOLE / DIPOLE BHBl DEFINI

•AGING : 25 METRES H++++++I PROBA

-pARATION ' l - JES^^ POSSIB

BEDROCK ANOMALY

TE

BLE

ILE

N 0- DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

CLIENT

GOLDEN PHEASANT RESOURCES LTD.TITLE

f. P. SURVEY LINE AT 2 S

SCALE: DRN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: DRNG. NO.:

1 ' I25O R. C. APR/88 1

\ilil:\ JAMES W\dE EwqiNEERiNq Lid.MTr*Mla

- Jvi-^? ^---^^ftjf^J-flf*'-^ ~ i ft- A- 1- 2w

iT l l l l l

6+OO IV 5+00 W 4 f 00 W 3 + OO W

t6-' - NR .

4

5K2KIK IK

258 .289 .266

LEGENDINSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER * EOA /P-2 f T/ME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER ' P HOENIX IPT~I

Tx POWER i l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. on/2 sec. off

/6O

ARRAY PARAMETER

MODE t DIPOLE

A- SPACING ; 25

N - SEPARATION

4+00 E 5+OOE 6+OOE 7+OOE 8+OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)._____t i

-o —l —2

li 1111111H 1111 ftl 111 nTiTi H tin 11 ri 111 iTFPq ( ) : NOISY READING

2 2l

-2 - 3

/ -t -2

.-2 - o

N.R. - O - ;

•-2

246 4 2

APPARENT RESISTIVITY ( OHM - M )

50 5O .SK .5 K

452 -227128 - 2/7

7O - 72

77 -SO 39O/ - 790 l- 457 . 486

991 -/4O * 469/ -687 -572\ - 48O -464\\-i2

V'- 8 4\ . 1 20\ ' 81

IOO IOO IOO

E/DIPOLE ^mm - DE.

b METRES l i li inn - Ph

IV -- 1 ' 4 ^^SSS - PC

-'•*--'

\ 1 7 \IOO IOO .5K .5K

BEDROCK ANOMALY

'FINITE

'OBABLE

SSIBLE

N 0- DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

\x/*

.5K

CLIENT


/.P. S URVEY LINE AT IN

SCALE; DRN.BY: APPR. BY: DATE: DRNG. NO.:

1 ' 1250 R. C. APR/88 2

li /i //l JAMES W\ck EuqiNEERiNq Lrd.(Tramlar

":: S^'v j:;^*^^r:;sfF^;^3''^

l + OOE 2+00 E 3+OOEl

4 +OOE

J____________L.

• O l -l 'l -l

-l . o

3O

. N .R. . N R. . N.R

IOO IOO lOO

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION ARRAY PARAMETERS

RECEIVER ' EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN) MODE ' DIPOLE / DIPOLE

TRANSMITTER * PHOENIX IPT-I A-SPACING i 25 METRES li r i 1.1 r i i —t^n *-l l 13

Tx POWER t l k WATT N ' SEPARATION -- l - 4

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 sec. on/2 sec. off

l3 4- 00 W 2 + OOW + OOW O+OO

l ' l

2 2

'l -l / —2 ~-l -~5 XP . O

l 'l /O '-l —5 -~2 ) O -l

30 3O

.SK IK SK SK

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

-J.-yV - -* f1?VT ' '-J ' -l'-*.*"' " .

^:iiH^!^*^3^^

w 5+OOW 4+OOW OOV/

J——————————L.

/V

W

W

/V

f

2

3

4

/v ^

N *

N r

z3

4

20Kl5KlpK5K 2OK I5K I5K 2OK\ \ \ y IK IK .SK .SK

288/6 ^

IK SK SK

lIK

96 \ -596l - 3O74 -/203/ -84/ -829 - 63O

/O37 - / /89 \ -8/7- 483 \ - /265'vv^. 904^^--". /6O7 -2544 -2839 /265X-664J

. 3OK' '39772^/^3034 - 2662 -/334 -25/9 - / 987 -3445 f '847 "^^JO92-^ ~919/ - 2485 ' 2191 -1414

:~*s -

58O6 -/96/ -1-918 -2592 -4854 -4^7 -/24/ C '317 - 7O5 7 -224/ -424/ - /79/ j -913

IK .SK .SK IK IK30K^t \ \ 2OK

6 + OOE 7+00 E 8 + OOE 9 + OO E lO+OO E

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.). _____l ______.______,______L

4 2

-2

•-2

•NR

• NR -;

IO 12 14 I4I2IO86

051015, 25 30 40•28 '41 '47

-4

-3

-l "7

20 2O 30 4O SO


.SK .SK .5JC IK IK .SK .SK

•2O7 y -637 . ./58 \ \ -H85

IK

-1379

4/99 - 1187

\ 'f lSK IK IK

•1816 - /8O4

3O86 -2565 -2265

IK .SK

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE : DIPOLE / DIPOLE

A-SPACING i 25 METRES

N - SEPARATION * ; - .4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

HiillllH - PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS

DATE DR. BY APPR.

CLIENT


/. P. SURVEY LINE AT 3N

SCALE:

125 ODRN. BY:

R. C.APPR. BY: DATE:

APR/88DRNG. NO.:

3

/j JAMES W\dE ENqiNEERJNq Lrd.ITrantlar

;-;^^

/+OO E 2 + OO E 3+OOE 4 + OO E 5+OO E

•J———————————L. J—————-J- J__________L. J—————l.

i .; - i -i -2 -i

•l -l

•l -l

• l --I\ o

-O ' l 'O -l

•l .1

•NR

• NR -NR -NR

SK IK SK SK IK

723 \\-5278\ -2O/7 79 -59 -TO -76 -6O-22O -/93 -/44

9*O. \ -/995 -/878 -/383^ -7O9 -711 f -314 -335 -26f -*45 -flO -128 '/O2-^ -74 -78 -7O

/559 -2995 -2205 \ -878 f - 348 -362 -427 -242 -/27 -/52 -/44 - 119 \-9O -58 / -274

374 .273 \ -2397 -42O8 -26/3 /-39/ -429 -423 -329 -/86 -.'65 -f 77 -747 -;33 \ -68 /*294

IK .SK .SK IK IK .SK 'OO IOO

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER i EDA IP-2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER * PHOENIX IPT'I

Tx POWER : l k WATT

ARRAY F

MODE

A- SP

N - SE

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. on /2 sec. off

ci y

S/

01

-O* til

M 04

2 it ro

2 •i2

2

it n

*

(ri (ri

IV)

01 Ol

01 01

(tt 01

OJ 4-

O

O rv* * O o O- o o.

o

-R^^ ^

o + oo f+OOE 2+00 E 3 + OOE 4+OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)——i_____l_____,______,_____,_____L


K)K I5K I5K IQK SKX'13795 -

IK ,5K 100 IQOI6II4/ '0^26 -IO8B \ '2/2 \ '76 J -256 / - 693

• rO25 \. - 112 - 409^/ -796 -52O7897V *IO63

86 7 f ~4O575S -15742 f 'I4IO x" *95/

•15527 7 7-2466 -;O76 -672

•655

C 2O^ I5K IOK5K

436O -33O4 7 '9/4

PARAMETERS

E - DIPOLE /DIPOLE

PACING i 25 METRES

SEPARATION -- l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

Jl IH'l l II — PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

NO- DESCRIPTION DATE DR. 8Y APPR,

REVISIONS

CLIENT


L P. SURVEY LINE AT 5 N

SCALE:

1250DRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

4

\ilil:\ JAMES WxdE ENqiNEEmuq Lid

:Bfnp^ - J - ~- W i " i^*h^3J!^(^'^([^:vj^^|^^^!!^

l

W/ 3+OO W 2+OO W l + OO W ooWIRES

l

l

l

l

l

l

i i r r i i . . i r T ^m i in q U-U3JLfcU^JLJ-LJL l l l

6 8

.4

4 2 246 642

tSKIOKSKlK IK 15728 S -646

5K IOK IOK

•2397 \ -7O852

IOK I5K I5K IOK SK'522613795 -16114

fOfC

•2383

•IO32 - 2247 -2777

•65J -3235 -2402

IK IK

•695O '6251 '787 7997 'IO63

IOK GK 2OK 2OK I5K IOK SK

•75742 X - 1410

•15527 S 7-2466 -7O76

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER i EDA. IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER * PHOENIX IPT'.l

Tx POWER - l k WATT

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE i DIPOLE / DIPOLE


N ~ SEPARATION * l - 4


OO E 2+OO E 3 +00 E 4+OOE 5+OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC J

2246


IOK &K I5K IOK IOKISK2OK

17988 L "9345 { (-2O97I \*-x^

1544 \ '571 '-20889 l -I45O7'-18494 -14913 -12447

•I276T -X - 18929 -I8I39/ -24981 -13128 f -19559

•20754 -19148 18155 \ -13428

2OK - 2OK

I5K '

I5K

PARAMETERS

DE -' D/POLE/D/POLE

SPACING - 25 METRES

SEPARATION - l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

11 ITTt Tn - PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

H0' DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

CLIENT


/. P. SURVEY LINE AT 6 N

SCALE:

1250DRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

5

\ilil:\ JAMES Lid.HgTramlar

T l l l l l

/+OO W o+oo OO E 2+OO E

•t

l l l l l l l l l

642

2956

I5K 15

I6O8

'9l2i

SK IK .SK .SK IK

1378

SK tOK

-6695 -6006 X - l 1311

•86 1 T/ 7 -629

IK5K&K2OK5KIOKI5K2OK4OK5OK4OK 2OKI5K IOK 20K

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER ' EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER ' PHOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER - l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. on/2 sec. off

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE i DIPOLE X D IPOLE

A-SPACING - 25 METRES

N ~ SEPARATION -- l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

~ DEFINITE

- PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

DESCRI

^-.,-.-.^ .'! .JEj*!ca-.---J3-. w ^:p- r^;|a*f -- ' - " ' " - - " ' " " ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ '

7+00 E 8 +OOE 9 + 00 E /O + OOE II+OO E

iAPPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)

O

J4-M-4M.UI iimmrpi

46 8 8642 2 4

•6

\ 4


IOO .5K IK SK K)K IOK IOK (OK IOK 2OK 2OK

2O K

si** /oese -eoso -eze* -5287 - ii9oe -92i9i ivzseie \-i9459

•12245 -IO4S6 -I47OI xxr2O89/

IO960 -12961 -128181689 -f369

-709 - 542 '210 -2244 -/33f8 13732 -11317

SK IOK 2DK 2OK I5K

PARAMETERS

MODE i DIPOLE / DIPOLE

A-SPACfNG -- 25 METRES

N - SEPARATION * l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

- PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

NO- DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

CLIENT


f. P. SURVEY LINE AT 7 N

SCALE:

1250DRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

6

lf/fl/1 JAMES W\ck Lid.

2 + OOE 3+00 E 4 + OO E 5 i-00 E 6+OO E

mil iiiiiiliriTnHi

8 /O 1 2 14 14 12 10 8642468IO2 121066 42 2 4 68 8 4 2

•8 .-2 --2

•-2

2OK I5K I5K I5K KX 5K SK* 2OK 2OK IOK SKi f s15 K l SK 2O K 3QK 3OK

•19968S - /32/2/X -2/0/8 - 2953O/ -32O5I \-2O983 -2O533 {-12523

16273 7 -//836/ /-27O73 f-;8588 ( -33191 -34762

•76.73 \ -I992O\ -22272 -2/2/9 x -3622B/ -23766V '/6967 /'•344^4 -22752 -29/

IK .5K IOO

293\ • II797\ - /85//X -22422

\ \ \ IOK I5K 2OK

bO'23S83'2Sl9 /.5586O\\\l-9286 -8967^/ -4/47 -3996

7O84 X '/9O8/

54O8 -2O24 -4932 -/933•23O5O -23983 -2959O -24725 S - 38925

3OK 3CK IOK IK .SK .SK

/5/C

LEGE/VD

PARAMETE

RECEIVER ' EDA IP-2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER t PHOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER - l k WATT

MODE - O\POL\

A-SPACING - 2

N - SEPARATIOi

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. o n /2 sec. o ff

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

2+OOVy I+OOWl

o + oo OO E

Jl__________L J——————————L.

N = l

N : 2

N = 3

N = 4

g-UJ-l ' l l l l l H i l l l l H l l IHP1

642 O O 246

8

N * l

W.^ 2 -

N * 3

N = 4 -

/5K IO K 5K SK

N •15378 IO928' -2268 X -5/9

•/502 - 1383 -1223 -5O9

3OK 20K 2OK

•23854

/2OK IOK5K

3 +OOE 4+00 E 5 +OO E 6 + OOE 7+OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.).______l______,______.______,

8 IO tO 8 6420 024 4

12 12 10 8642O O 246

APPARENT RESISTIVITY ( OHM - M l

2OK 30K 2OK IOK IK .5K .SK SK

633 X. ' 3/3 - 24O

•42879 -35355

52 - 40/28 .

*OO4 . /O63 -2/29

JOK 40K 4OK

PARAMETERS

i DIPOLE / DIPOLE

*ACING i 25 METRES

-.PARATION

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- D EFINITE

niiiini - PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS

DATE DR. BY APPR.

CLIENT


/. P. SURVEY L/NE AT 8 N

SCALE:

f ' /25ODRN. BY:

R. C.

APPR. BY: DATE:

APR/88DRNG. NO.:

7

\ilil:\ JAMES WdE ENqiiMEERJNq Lid.ITrai,*lar

l

ll +OOW o+oo 00 E 2 + OOE 3 +OOE

l l l l l lt l

4 4

'5 - 4

6 8/O 12 12 10 86420 O

l

l SK ISK IS K IOK

I678O y - l 1466 - I49I9/ -16854^ - /O30/ \-8254

- /246/

SK IK .5K .5K IK ISK 2OK 3OK 2OK IOK IK .SK .5

/ 17994 ' 17978.

- 21396 \' 19412 -"/9769V -6992

22568 - 23/23 -}37824 \ - I2O48 /' 822

'^ l ) l |/226O8 - 23438 f - 4353/ /' I 8O68 l- 1544\\n J i l- i3OK 4OK30K20K ISK IOK IK IK

N\\V\( \\. 263O3\Ov* ÔJ

79 - 35355 ^3/422^^

y/40128 . 377I3//?' 934

3939O ' 4 2345/X/. I OO4

SK 15k 3OK 4OK 4OK ISK SK

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER - EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER * PHOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER ' l k WATT

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE -- DIPOLE / DIPOLE


N - SEPARATION - l - 4

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. on /2 sec. o ff

9+OO E /0 + OOE // + OO E /2+00 EAPPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)

.2

-NR

rmimiimiiniiiiiB iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiffl

246 6 44 6 8

8 6 20 O 4


.SK IK SK IOK I5K I5K K3K IOK /O!•127 •233 -168

-366 -2O5

•498 -27O

-333 -397

IQKlSKtSK IOK SK SK IOKIO4OOV •*9325/ \ -9OB4 J - /O295. -7937 7 - I587S/ -9657 -6832 \ -48S4 V/4298

x -J34/4\\\ \ .IK5KIOKI5K 20K

IOK

3OK 2OK tSK IOK

L BEDROCK ANOMALY

'DIPOLE miiltm . DEFiNITE

METRES H UMIN - PROBABLE

i 1 ' 4 ESS^SS ~ POSSIBLE

N 0- DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS

DATE DR. BY APPR.

CLIENT


/.P. SURVEY LINE AT 9N

SCALE:

; ' I 25ODRN. BY:


APt

\tlil:\ JAMES W\ck ENqir

DRNG. NO.:

7/88 8

ÊERiiMq Lid.ITratular

J + 00 E 5 + 00 E"l

7 + 00 E 8 + OO E

• Q 'l 'Q -l '2 -l -2 */ - l 'l -l * O

•O -O -O -O 'O -O -l -l 'O -l 'l 'Z

•o 'O '-i - o -; */ -o -r -i " i -i -i

•o -o *o — i -o —i "O -i 'i . - 2 -; -; -;

'i -i -l -l

•l - l • l -2 . O

•i -i

.o .1 -O

•84 -55 -61 •/49 -211 - f4l -'47 -127 -233 - 168

187 -III '2O8 -225 - ISS -l 47 -134 -2OI -199 - 164 -248 '223 -366 -2O5 -3/4 / -80S

.132 -ISO . /O7 -f3/ -262 -222 -2O9 -278 -255 -276 -284 -242 -24/ -128 '211 -322 - 498 -27O -36/ X -756 "9

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER t EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER ' PHOENIX \PT~I

Tx POWER i l k WATT

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE - DIPOLE / DIPOLE

A-SPACING : 25 METRES

N - SEPARATION * l - 4

BEDROt

- DE

H i H H H ~ PR*

Tx DUTY CYCLE * 2 sec. on/2 sec. off

/+OOE 2 + OO E 3+OOE 4 + OO E

•o •o •i •i

l '-l -O ~O '-l 'O - O -O -O -O - -t -O -O -O

•~/ -( *~2 *~/ -O */ *~/ *O -O .'O *O 'O

•-3 --3 —2 "Z —2

42 O O 2

•7922 -7793 '7058

335

/OO

-2O3T ./99 -/4O

243 -2/6 -24f -347

6f

75

19O -233 -296 -23/ -17-1 - 132 -ISO -IO7

1717 /94 -195 *237 -J82 -3O9 -242 -2/2 -f 95 -/86

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

/v

IV

N

/V

. 2

3

+OO w O-I-OO OOE 2 + OO E

-o •-3

6 4 2 0 O 2

N

N = 2

N

IOK6K20K I5K IOK

•791* l 1-24273; \ ' IO6IZ '7322 84

I5K 157

I5K .5K IK IK .SK

"^fWtfSS"**ff PK

/•f-OO E 2+00 E 3+00 E 4 -f'.OO E

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY

l5+OO E

(M SECJ

n 11111111111

6

2 4


2Q0r 30K 4pK 4pK 3(WC 20fC BK

•46102 /-2698O A/46J7

3OK2OK I5K

1AMETERS

DIPOLE / DIPOLE

-- 25 M ETRES

\RATION : l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

Illlll. II - PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE


REVISIONS

CLIENT


/. P. SURVEY L/NE AT /2 N

SCALE:

1250DRN. BY:

R. CAPPR. BY: DATE:

APR/88DRNG. NO.:

9

\ilil:\ JAMES Lid.

'- ,- f f- . -*-* rf. . " - -:*"1 -"- ' ST'*" """• : ' - ' ' "*- "' - '--" ' -~'- ? " -**-*if 1"' r*' ; ** • 1 v-: i -;"'i !S'-l-' j *.' " -'

+ OO W 2 + OO W /+00 Wlo+oo /•HOC E

l

l

l

l

l

l

t

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

4 4,4 -3 -4 ^"s-4 -5 ^-^-4

•3 • 4

.4

• O

K?K SK 20K74822*15 XW682 VI2575 -23760

•/945/ ^^57/0 \ -28566

J5K .5*

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER -- EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER ' PHOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER : l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 sec. on /2 sec. off

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE .- D IPOLE / DIPOLE


N~ SEPARATION * l -4

vtr wtaB3fconeii?"'niii^r

2 + OOE 3+OOE 4 +OO E - 5 + OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)..^.—^—l______,______, ______,______l

•O 'O -O " O 'O

•-I - O -O *O -/

•~l * O -O 'O

• -I .Q -O -O

f ; ' N OISY READING


•52-69 -55 -57 -57

. 75 . 98. -89 . 75 - 84 -

^^-XX(26 - 1 16 -117 - 124 -

- 1 23 - 136 - / 47 - 182 - - . *

BEDROCK ANOMALY

Itl.I'M'f1 - PROBABLE

RW*^^ - POSSIRI F

N 0- . DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

* * * * .

m v * * * *

" * * * *

CLIENT


f. P. SURVEY LINE AT I4N

SCALE: DRN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: DRNG. NO.:

f - I25O R. C. APR/88 IO

\ilil: JAMES W\dE EwqiNEERiNq Lid.)Tran*lar

2 4-00 W /•i-OOW O+OO +OOE 2 + OO

xf

N.R,

•O - O •O

. O.

- o

•-i

IK SK) }0844

K)K I5K 2OK 2OK I5K I5K2OK \5KtOK SK IK .SK IOO SO SO

-63 -52 -69-88 -79 -76 -75 -98. -81

1 2 O 3 - ;68;\\-ll7O7 - /395O - 24/2OI - /2488" - 256 4558 - 386

28*6 V 14822 2OO7O

J 2 f ^--^ 79 /- l 2 6

IK 5K 15K 2OK I5K IOK /OK 2OK 50K 2OKIOK 5K IK

LEGE/VD

.SK


TRANSMITTER ' PHOENIX l PT'

Tx POWER * l k WATT


ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE '- DIPOLE / DIPOLE

A-SPACING : 25 METRES

N - SEPARATION i l -

BEDROCK ANO

- DEFINITE

JHiniii - PROBABLE

- POSSIBLE

N o.

J.4+OOW

t3+OOW OOW

T l l l l lt

2 4

. 2

r

726

/K 5CK IOK IOK

6 3 4/ \\V\V- 72059W 9574

IOK SK SK K)K IOK SK

\ l MSK IOK I5K 20K 20K I5K I5K20K I5K K)K SK

. f /. f f/395O - 24/2OI - 12488' - 256

308X- 9882

f2790\\- 3389 A - IO844 - f48O

23542

. . .. \ \ \ . . . .IK SK 2OK 2OK IOK IK .SK J5K IK

\\\ //i///// .IOK 2OK 5OK 2OK IOK SK IK

558

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER r EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMA

TRANSMITTER * PHOENIX IPT'I

Tx POWER t l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 s ec. on/2 sec.

~M, .^yy.

(8)

(S)

r t i/+OOW 0+00

. ———— 1 ————— 1 ————— 1 ————— 1 ————— 1 — 1 _____ 1 _____ 1

/+OOE

i

2 * OO E

APPARENT CHARGEABILITYl

l 3+00 E

(M SEC.)l

( ) * NOISY READING


20 K 20 K

•26311- \ - /46O9 -22266

1267 -2226320*

l - 1654?\o18416 -24246//-5i

30K 30K 5QK* '

20K /OK SK IK350

m

S2I

500

792

5/C IK

RAMETERS

DIPOLE X D IPOLE

CING i 25 METRES

'ARATION '1-4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

I'll i nil - PROBABLE

SSSSSSSSSi - POSSIBLE

N o. DESCRIPTION DATE DR. BY APPR.

REVISIONS

CLIENT


/.P. SURVEY L/NE AT I 5N

SCALE:

/25ODRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

\ilil:\ JAMES W\dE Lid.ITramlar

t

l

mi',' •'iyi.tf^^n-.j-f,,^ - - • •...-i—z—y. - '^j^ s . , •^.,:,'i.; j-s-. '-f*** r*'^-, -^ : ^j^4^- f -.-y ^-r?.^ ~ -' rVC1 ' \. - "R. * : - :*. .-/T- - !-" "if ' r *-

5+00 W ^ 4+CfoW 3+OOW 2+OOW

l l l l l l t l l l l l l l l l

REPEATABLE

2

N.R. - 4

.SK l

338 - 221

20K

26511

'K

21267 - 222t

f ./654/ f

\^ (6'Q6OV -38416 -242

30K5KIK5KK3K2OK3OK 3C

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER - EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER - P HOENIX IPT~I

Tx POWER t l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 sec. on /2 sec. off

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE i DIPOLE/

A- SPACING i 25

N - SEPARATION

3+OOE 4 + OO E 5 + OO E 6+OO E 7 + OOE

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)

( ) - NOISY READING

•i -i i •l •i -i . -i -i •o

'i -t - O -O -O ' O 'l -l -l 'l "O 'O

~l -l -O 'l -O "O - O - l -l -l - O -O

• o '-i '-l •o l


too too IQO

os

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE -- DIPOLE / DIPOLE


- SEPARATION - l ' 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

- DEFINITE

iiiiinii - PROBABLE

— POSSIBLE


REVISIONS

CLIENT


f. P . SURVEY LINE AT 16 N

SCALE:

I25ODRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

12

\ilils\ JAMES -WxdE ENqiNEERJNq Lid,

2+OO W 1+00 W OO OO E 2+00 E

J__________L J___________L.

•i -l

4 6 8 10 2020IO 8 6 442O:6' •l -l

l -l -l 'l

-l -l

•l -l •O •l 'l

REPEATABLE AND STABLE ON ALL DIPOLES

•540 X -/604 -/60819 /34

.SK IK

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION


TRANSMITTER * P HOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER ' l k WATT

ARRAY PA R AM E

MODE - DIPO

A- SPACING i

N ~ SEPARATI


l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

+ 00 5+OO W 4+OO W 3 + OO W 2 -

J___________U J__________L.

— l •l -l 'l -l • l 'l 'l

--l -l -O -O -7 -; */ *0 -O

—2 --I -l -l 'O 'l "l - O 'O ' l 'l

•-2 • l •f

100 /OQ .SK .SK • 86

• /74

•241

•341 -IO2

se --re

100

too•60 7 -\\B

•224 - 119 -148 -124

136 -324 -269 -172 •/63

.5K IK IK .SK

a: t* r; . -

/+OOE 2 + OOE + OOE 4+00 E

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY (M SEC.)


100yx4

i BEDROCK ANOMALY

m - DEFINITE

- PROBABLE

S ~ POSSIBLE


REVISIONS

CLIENT


/. P. SURVEY LINE AT I7N

SCALE:

I25ODRN. BY:


APR/88DRNG. NO.:

13

JAMES W\dE Lid.

iB 2 + OOW l +OOW O + OO I+OOE

ll l

420

• 2

•-t

•-2 \ - l

.5K .SK 100

138

149

•369 '352.. \ - 82 -37 -42

188 -447 \ -85

I8O -198 -SOI -IOI

•98

IOO

X

ISI

' J* 226 -203 / /~ 10 H X / -243 -/38 - 185 * -184 - S O8 -138 -ISO

.5KIK IK .SK

LEGEND

INSTRUMENTATION

RECEIVER ' EDA IP -2 (TIME DOMAIN)

TRANSMITTER - PHOENIX IPT-I

Tx POWER - l k WATT

Tx DUTY CYCLE ' 2 sec. on / 2 sec. off

ARRAY PARAMETERS

MODE -- D IPOLE / DIPOLE

A-SPACING - 25 M ETRES

N-SEPARATION - l - 4

BEDROCK ANOMALY

~ DEFINITE

- PROBABLE

~ POSSIBLE

N0- DES'

Ministry of Report of WorkNorthe.-n Development

* and Mines (Geophysical, Geological, ' Ontario Geochemical and ExpendituT

42A06NE8260 2 .11290 CARMAN 900ype o

Potsn i ~Holders. -

Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd..cyCAd i*y*o w

,-500%

CarmanProspector's Licence No.

T-/I781Address

500-455 Granville Street Vancouver, B.C.Survey Company

Robert E. Gillick S AssociatesName and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Robert E. Gillick, 1M WHIinqton Dr. North Bay, Ontario

Cite of Survey (from ii to) ffiiM8!l.*?].ffl[j..!S.

f oiai MJlei'of line CuT

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys,

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

-Other J. p.

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

v

5

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type Of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date

Aug. 26/88Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

____Ulo Paltser, 501-5734 Yonge Street

Willowdale, Ontario M2M 3T3Date Certified

August 26, 1988Certified by ure)

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand MinesMinistere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

September 7, 1988 Your File: W8806-158 W8806-160

Our File : 2.11290

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated August 22, 1988.Geophysical (Magnetometer z Induced Polarization) Survey submitted on Mining Claims P 947057 et al in the Township of Carman

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

W.R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines s Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Rocm 6610Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Telephone: (416) 965-4888

AB: se

cc: Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd Suite 500455 Granville Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 1V2

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining St Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist rimmins, Ontario

ONTAWO OfOLOOICAl ASSESSMENT

OWCE

HOT J 3 1988

RECEIVED

cc: Mr. R.E. Gillick 114 Wellington Dr. North Bay/ Ontario PIC 1E9

cc: Mr. U. PaltserJames Wade Engineering Ltd Suite 501 5734 Yonge Street Willowdale, Ontario M2M 3T3

Ministry ofNorthern Development

inesOntario

an^Wir

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Date

August 22, 1988

File2.11290

Mining Recorder's Report ofwork *o. W88o6- 158

Recorded HolderGolden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

Township'0^Carman

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Assessed

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer.

Radiometric —

35

Induced polarization.

Other.——————

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

P 947057 to 60 inclusive 987235 to 45 Inclusive

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological _____________________days

Geochemical ________________ days

Man days | |

Special provision Q)

Airborne l l

Ground [53

|A| Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

fi Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

l

. Ministry of Northern Development

Ontario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

DateAugust 22,

File2.11290

Mining Recorder'* Report of1988 Work *Jo- W8806-160

Recorded HolderGolden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

Township oX&JtaSCarman

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Assessed

GeophysicalElectromagnetic .

Magnetometer —

Radiometric ——

Induced polarization.

Other ^——————

31.8

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

P 947051-52-54-55-56 987235-36-38

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological _________________days

Geochemical _________________ days

Man days

Special provision

Airborne l l

Ground fxl

l l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

[ l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claimsnot sufficiently covered by the survey

P 987239

insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not - exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.

628 (85/12)

Ministry olNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expend!

DOCUMENT No.

uiesj

Mining Act

structions: — Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.vpe of SurvevU)

MagnetometerClaim HolderU)

Township or Araa

man Twp. _ _ -Prospector's Licence No.

Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd.Address

500-455 Granville St., Vancouver, B.C.urvev Company

Robert E. Gillick S Associates Ltd. ]Date of Survey (from fi to) " [Total Miles of lino Cut03 03 88 |04 01 88 ,, 0 0Day j Mo. | Yr.J Day | Mo.J Yr. | J. "'5™.__ —

•Jam* and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

______R.E. Gillick, 114 Wellington Dr., North Bay, Ontario \ '\C l t- C\redits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)pedal Provisions




Mn Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

:xpenditures (excludes power stripping!Type of Work Performed

'erformed on Clalm(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Day : Credits

Total Expenditures

Oat*May 24, 1988

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Electromagnetic

947058947059

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

987238

987239

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

.TUT) R J'E

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr Recorded

Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature) Date-Approved as Hecoraea

iG/f ,

Branch Director

instructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected

- In columns at right.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Jame and Postal Address of Person Certifying

_______U. Paltser 501-5734 Yonge St.. Willowdaie. Ontario M2M 3T3l Date Certified

May 24,1988Certified by (Signature)

Ministry o('* Northern Development

and Mines

. \ \ cA l

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, f Geochemical and Expenditures)!

Jyffl806' H* Q..

Instructions: — Please type or prim.If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.

Note: -

Type of SurveyU)

Claim Holder(s)

Address

Survey Company

Name and Address

Township or Area

Induced Potential - Resistivity Carman Twp.Prospector's Licence No.

Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd. T-4781

500-455 Cranville St., Vancouver, B.C.Date of Survey (from ft lo) .. Total Miles of line Cut

Robert E. Cillick S Associates Ltd. 03 03 88 i OH OH 8 8 ———Day | Mo. | Yr. j Day | Mo. | Yr,

of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Robert E. Gillick, 114 WIMington Dr., North Bay, OntarioCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions




Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

381.5

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

•Other jp

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

31.

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type Of Work Performed

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

DateMay 2/1, 1988

Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Certification Verifying Report of Work Wlhereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work

or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

U. Paltser, 501-5734 Yonge St., Willowdale, Ontario M2M 3T3Du* Certified

May 21, 1988Certified by

Ontario


Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

File_

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey (s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

Induced Polarization - Resistivity

Carman S Langmuir Twps.——^— Golden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

Survey Company — Author of Report - Address of Author.

Robert E. Cillick 6 Associates Ltd. R.E. Gillick_________________ 114 Willingdon Dr. North Bay, Ontario

Covering Dates of Survey March 3 -April 4. 1988(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut——————^^———^

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYSGeophysical —Electromagnetic.

-Otr^r 31.8

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

HATR. May 24, 1988 STHNATIIRR. ^/^fc~Author of Reporteport or Agent

Res. Geol. .Qualifications. c* '3 f 0\.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

'(p'r'e'fix)'

......JR.,

947051•••••••••i (T* c* l *T*T* l*****t***

(number)

.J?............

P

947054•i* •*4****rfl*7 •**Trrt*** *

947055

947056

947058

947059

.mm..

.887235..P.....................88723S..........P......................887238..........P.......................887238.........

i

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 12

837 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ————————————————————————Number of Readings — Station interval___________________________ I.in p spacing^-—-^— Profile scale————-^^^—————.—.————...————-—.——-—.—————-Contour interval.

Accuracy — Scale constant. Wl

Nerf

p—^

Sa z

H

00tL

erf

Instrument.

Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———.

Instrument

ECTROMAGNETK Tr.il rnnfigiiratinn

Toil spparatinn

Arrnrary

Method: O Fixed transmitter O Shoot back D In lineFrprmpnry

CD Parallel line

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

O Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument _______EDA \ P~2Method Q Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time 2 sec. ______________________ Frequency —————

- Qff timp 2 sec.______________________ Range.- Delay tim,. 160 millisec._____________- Integration tim^ 120,220,420, 820, millisec.

Power__________Phoenix 1 kwatt IPT-1

Electrode array ____dipole - dipoleElectrode spacing 25 metresType of electrode steel stake

SELF POTENTIALInstrument.——-——————————.^^^—————————————^———^—^— Range.Survey Method ————^————-————————-^—^———^—-—-———-————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.

Values measured.Energy windows (levels)^^———————^^^^——————-—^-^———..^—^—...—...—— Height of instrument—-——^—————-—^.^——————.———Background Count.Size of detector——-——-————-^^^^———————-^———.-—.^^-—.....^^—Overburden ——-——————^-———-——.^^-——————.——^——.-—.—————

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS {SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey———^^^^——————————————Instrument ——^—^—-——————————.^^^—Accuracy——————————————————————^-^^—Parameters measured.

Additional information {for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ———

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy^^——————————^.———(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used———————-———...^——..-——^-——————...—-Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area-——-———^^^————^-^^————.—.—Ôver claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Others __________________________Field Analysis (-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. __________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis-———

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method——. Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -———

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General General.


Ontario

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

File.

Type of Survey(s

Township or Area

Claim Holder(s)

Survey Company

Author of Report Address of Autho

Covering Dates ol

Total Miles of Lin

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

MagnetometerCarman TwpGolden Pheasant Resources Ltd.

Robert E. Gillick S Associates ltd.R. E. Gillick

r 114 Wellington Dr., North Bay, OntarioSurvey March 3 - April 4, 1988

e r,,t 14.89

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

((incoming to office)miles

DAYS- i-i per claim Geophysical— Rlprtrnmagnptir

— Mngnetnm^trr 40

—Radiometric-Cttbrr

Opnlnpiral

fjporripmiral

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer.-™ V.lfrtmmaonf.tir RaHinmptrir

DATF, MaY

Res. Geol.

Previous Surveys

(enter days per claim)

24, 1988 sinNATITRF . J^2fcAuthor of Report or Agent

Qualifications

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

P(prefix) P

••*tt*******)*****t********i***

• •••••••••••••••^••••••••(•••••*

..............P..............

............P...............

..............P...............

..............P.............

..............P..............

...............P..............

..............P..............

..............J?..............

..............P..............

..............J?.....,.......

f

917057(number)

........9.4.7.0.5.8..............947059* i * * * * i *T* * *l *T*TtT* •••••••••••••t

t * * * * t * •T*V*I •V*V*V* ••••••••••••i*

.......J&AmS...............

.......JMI1723U6...............

.......A&7.237...............

.......3-8.72.i8..............

007070

987240• ••••i* i M? ufA *T* * * T * •••••••••••••*

987241• **tit**X*T*f •T*7*lti**i*****t ****

887:242********C *T *\ JT. /^t •••••••••••••*

987243

557244987245

TOTAL CLAIMS 15

i

d

{S3

837 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ——1^8__________________ Nnmhpr of Readings — Station interval———25 metres______________Lme spacjng______100 metres Profile scale_____________________________—^——-—^--————,..—— Contour interval _____100 gammas—.————..————..—-————.—-————___

Instrument______EDA OMNI IVUHH

ZDiurnal correction method recording base station

Ogg**H

Si-)

O

Base Station check-in interval (Hours) N/ABase Station location and value _____N/A

Instrument

Coil configuration ________________________________________________———— Coil separation ———————————————————————————————————————————————————__^_ Accuracy __________________________________________________________. Method: O Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line D Parallel lineFrequency

(specify V.L.F. itation)

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ———————————————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain CD Frequency Domain

QP Parameters - On time ._________________________ Frequency —————

2C pq Power.

Electrode array.

—Off time__________________________ Range.— Delay time —-——————————————————————— Integration time ————————————————————

Electrode spacing . Type of electrode .

SELF POTENTIALInstrument———————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method —————-———^^—^——.^—————.^—-———-^——————.-———

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)—.—.-————.^^^—^————^—...————^^^—^——.....—-Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector-—————-——-—-—————-^^^^—————————————^^————Overburden ———————^^-————-^—^^————..——.^^.^————————.————

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey———^——————————^^^^^^^^— Instrument ———-—————————————.———

Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)———

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy——————————-^—-^—(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.____________________________———Sensor altitude—————————^^———— Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area————————————————————..-—Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————, Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth———-— Terrain————————

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D Dn

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (~

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ——-———.^—

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used .——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method ——Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ministry oiNorthern Development

MinesOntario

AssessmentWorkBreakdown

1. Type of Survey ..

2. Township or Area

3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey

...................MI^J....^?.0.5.6._.......?5Z?5?...-??Z95?

947054947059

..

4. Number of Miles of Line Cut .....................j. Flown . .......................

*5. Number of Stations Established . ...........................................^.^.........

*6. Make and type of Instrument Used ......................................................

*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity .....................................^...............^...

*8, Frequency Used and Power Output ...........................................*...........

9. Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)

Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting etc.) .,.................

Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days...................

Calculation

54.4 x 7 - 381.5 H- _________ - 381.5 -i. JjJ_____ - 31.8^^^^^^ Technical Line-cutting Number Assessment 'credits

This is the fraction of the survey applicable to claims listed. o f clalms Per claim

The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the' limits of the above listed claims {1 Check If otherwise, please explain .....^.^

Dated-. ....My.34^X0-.-.-.-..-.. S igned:

Note: (A) * Complete only if applicable.(B) Complete list of names, addresses and dates on reverse side.(C) Submit separate breakdown for each type of survey.(D) Submit in duplicate.

827 (8BH2)

Details of Assessment Work Breakdown

FIELD WORK

Type of Work Name 6 A*ddress Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

45.28*m . *M*WM.Wv*l.**M* .

March• ••••^•^•••••^•••••••••••••••^•^•••••••••^•••••^••••••••••••i

CONSULTANTSNumber of

Name 6c Address Dates Worked (specify in field or office) S hour daysRobert J. Anderson, North Bay March 12,26 Field

___....,.._... _,. ,._ , .Jâr^ÂPriI .25.P-ffI^

____ Robert E. Gillick, North Bay May 1, 2 , 3 Office 2.51

DRAUGHTSMAN. TYPING. OTHERS (specify)Number of

Name 6 Address Type of Work Dates Worked 8 hour days

n

#501-5734 Yonge St.

TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS 54.5

LINE-CUTTINGNumber of

Name Address Dates Worked 8 hour days

TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS

MAP' SYMBOLOGY' V CODY TWP.' '^ | h - -*T

Avrrol CoblBwoi' .--i^-—!

"B -^ Bridg*

Con ir o rPo i ut t **i|j. J.'JU1

i J^' 1 ''l*jj' '•F*OO-WK '

. Culv4ffV*i:,'-V'f itV

Faiu.^/^^.;^.^^:^;^

. Ftatyrt Ovtlin* 1' --(t*n*tr*tt!*t (****r**, M*.* f - A, i:-1 ' , y Ctt-r. . - - ^ \i,s! -- 1

FlowHd LqndM r-' ' —— '

Marsh•^- ; A *" -**

:V,vast '. f. /-:7v^srO"5MU* Htud From* *a*u:ty(. Outcrop:-;'; 'j" ' r'ti^tS 1.- -'

*-"- i**9t'bl* F?S*p||-r ;--

-V

i Pip*liB*

Rood.

fftinMot ^TT**nH j, ^

-•It* M*tt*4*

RiHrvoir

River, Sliw. AtpTMHM**- :

*******l- "s. '^trMfttv* ** •*** -

.Spot El*v*1ton

. Tran4iBiuiOT

- - ^

"Altilfll Pol** ^ ' Wrmrf-.Dock. Pi*r

Woodtd ATM! .. .

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.R.O. -SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

, OtfvrNo. Dmtm DbpovtM Fi**

\

42A06NE0280 2.11290 CARMAN

MOOSE ISLAND

CROW ISLAND

l X 969946 ' . X l 969947

- -L "/-J—

ir——— - — — -*\— ——

P~* \ ' P

NIGHT HAWK LAKE.

r

LANGMUIR TWP.

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.OTHER RCJADSTRAILS ~SURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. — LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS. ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINES — PARCEL BOUNDARY - MINING CLAIMS ETC- -

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -*-

UTILITY-LINES -* NON-PERENNIAL STREAM - FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT, SURF ACE 81 MINING RIGHTS ___________ 9" .SURF ACE RIGHTS ONLY ___________ —— O" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY ____ . __________ O

LEASE, SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS- ———— ______ H" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ______________ H" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY. _______________ B

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION . ___ . _____________ TORDER-IN-COUNCIL . ____________________ OCRESERVATION ____________ L ____________ ©

CANCELLED ______________________ . __ 9SAND ft GRAVEL __ . ___ . _ . ______________

MOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY C, 1913, VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R -S -O. 1VTO, CHAP. 3*O. SEC. A3. SUB* EC 1.

MChain*

20W

t ^.,'

SCALE 1:20 000

GRID Z ONE: 17

g————

TOWNSHIP

CARMANM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

TIMMINSMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

COCHRANE

Ontario

Ministryof LandNatural Management

Resources Branch

SORIGINAL COMPILATION JULY'1964

REVISED:

•••bar

G-4000

9872

4O

L9

/V

—

L8

N

—947057

L7

W

L6

W

——

L5

N

L3

N

LI

N

L2

S

n_ _

_ _

. _ —

9872

^45

DE

FIN

ITE

B

ED

RO

CK

A

NO

MA

LY

- P

RO

BA

BLE

B

ED

RO

CK

A

NO

MA

LY

- P

OS

SIB

LE

B

ED

RO

CK

A

NO

MA

LY

1! 1

.* JL

A

NO-

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

DR

. B

YA

PPR

.

RE

VIS

ION

S

CLIE

NT

GOLDEN PHEASANT RESOURCES

LTD.

TIT

LE

CA

RM

EN

'LA

NG

MU

IR

TO

WN

SH

IPP

RO

PE

RT

Yl.P

. C

OM

PIL

AT

ION

M

AP

SCA

LE:

; -- 25

ooD

RN

. B

Y:

R.

C ,

AP

PR

. BY

:D

ATE

:

MA

Y/8

8D

RN

G.

NO

.:

MA

P

14

ilil;

JAME

S W

\de

Lid.

42A06NE0280 2.11290 CARMAN

L8

NL

9 N

UO

NL

il N

LI2

NL

13

NLI4

N

LI5

NLIB

NLIT

NLI8

NLIB

N

L20 N

LS

I N

L22

NL

23 N

L 2

4 N

L25 N

L2

6 N

L27 N

BA

SE

L

INE

LE

GE

ND

- 10

00

* C

ON

TO

UR

S

- 5

00

*

CO

NT

OU

RS

- IO

O

5 C

ON

TO

UR

S

- IN

TE

RP

RE

TE

D

IRO

N

FO

RM

AT

ION

~ IN

TE

RP

RE

TE

D

FA

UL

T/S

HE

AR

O

13 l

9 Q

O

JL

** ^

~

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

DR

. B

YA

PPR

.

RE

VIS

ION

S

CLI

EN

T

GO

LDE

N

PH

EA

SA

NT

RES

OU

RC

ES

LTD

TITL

E CA

RM

EN

-LA

NG

MU

IR T

OW

NS

HIP

P

RO

PE

RT

Y

- C

ON

TOU

RE

D

TOTA

L F

IEL

D

MA

GN

ET

ICS

SC

ALE

:

l ' 2

500

DR

M.

BY

:

R.

C.

AP

PR

. BY

:D

ATE

:

MA

Y/8

8D

RN

G.

NO

.:

MA

P

15

ilil:

\ JA

MES

W\c

kLi

d. (UJT

rins

lir

LS N

L9

NLI

O N

Lil N

\LI2

N

\L1

3 N

LI4

N\

LI5

N

L16

NL

IT N

LI8

N

\LI9

NL

2O N

L2I

NL

22

NL

23

NL

24

N

L2

5

NL

26

NL27 N

h '7

9, 9

87

24

5

NO

TE

S

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

N

- E

DA

O

MN

I JZ

M

AG

NE

TO

ME

TE

R

BA

CK

GR

OU

ND

R

EM

OV

ED

-

57,0

00

X

O

SU

RV

EY

B

Y -

- R

OB

ER

T

E.

GIL

LIC

K

and

AS

SO

CIA

TE

S

LT

D.

No.

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

DR

. B

YA

PPR

.

RE

VIS

ION

S

CLI

EN

T

GO

LDE

N

PH

EA

SA

NT

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

LTD

.T

ITLE

CA

RM

EN

" LA

NG

MU

IR

TOW

NS

HIP

P

RO

PE

RT

Y

- TO

TAL

FIE

LD

MA

GN

ET

ICS

SC

ALE

:

t -- 2500

DR

N.B

Y:

R.

C.

AP

PR

. BY

:D

ATE

:

MA

Y/6

8

DR

NG

. N

O.;

DW

G.

16

ilil:

JAME

S W

\dE

Lid. fll

JTra

nsla

r

Documents

RPT ON MAG & IP SUR