If you can't read please download the document
Upload
rhys
View
32
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ROYAL LECTURE: DELIVERING THE LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN. Jeremy Prince and Ben King Transport Strategy Nottingham City Council. How many trips were made on public transport in Nottingham last year?. B) 17 m. A) 7 m. C) 77 m. D) 177 m. Who are we?. Jeremy Prince and Ben King - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ROYAL LECTURE: DELIVERING THELOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN
Jeremy Prince and Ben KingTransport StrategyNottingham City Council
How many trips were made on public transport in Nottingham last year?A) 7 mB) 17 mC) 77 mD) 177 m
Who are we?Jeremy Prince and Ben KingTransport Partnership Officer - Principal Transport OfficerTransport StrategyNottingham City Council
Local Transport PlanFinal Plan submitted to DfT March 2006
Comprehensive document
Jointly prepared by City & County Councils
Key PrioritiesGovernment Objectives:CongestionAir qualityRoad safetyAccessibilityLocal Objectives:Regeneration & neighbourhood renewalQuality of LifeEfficient maintenance
Location MapPopulation: 630,000
Roads
Buses
Rail
Trams
Maintenance
Interchanges
The Evidence
NET Line 1
BeforeJunction of Maid Marian Way and Friar Lane
AfterJunction of Maid Marian Way and Friar Lane
BeforeJunction of Maid Marian Way and Mount Street
AfterJunction of Maid Marian Way and Mount Street
The Proof
Key Trends
Chart1
100100100100
98.7102.697.383.8
98.5103.38778.4
99.7102.685.978.4
101.8105.977.267.6
100.6108.273.964.9
8% increase
26% decrease
35% decrease
0.6% increase
Traffic
Public Transport
Killed or Seriously Injured
Unemployment
Index
Sheet1
200020012002200320042005
Traffic10098.798.599.7101.8100.6
Public Transport100102.6103.3102.6105.9108.2
Killed or Seriously Injured10097.38785.977.273.9
Unemployment10083.878.478.467.664.9
Sheet2
Sheet3
Comparative road condition in the core cities
core cities public transport
-0.12
-0.11
-0.08
-0.04
-0.03
0.02
0.02
0.08
% change from 2000
core cities KSIs
0.55678670360.35
0.470.43
0.51240.432
0.8050.435
0.56094276090.4767676768
0.57276995310.5148669797
0.70666666670.5166666667
1.05238095240.6888888889
- 9%
- 16%
- 46%
- 15%
- 10%
- 27%
- 35%
(-9%) = % change
- 37%
1994/98
2005
KSIs per 1,000 resident population
core cities road condition
0.070.1
0.080.136
0.0810.175
0.0960.229
0.1460.198
0.170.15
0.1870.285
Principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Road condition where immediate works are required
pt patronage cha
Public transport patronage
% change
Derby-13%
South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%
West Midlands (312.5m)-11%
Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro
Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram
West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%
Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram
Leicester2%
Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%
Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram
KSIs chart
Road casualties
Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000
Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%
Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%
Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%
Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%
Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%
West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%
Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%
South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%
West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%
Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%
Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%
CORE CITIES
1994/982005
Tyne and Wear0.560.35
Greater Bristol0.470.43
Greater Manchester0.510.43
West Midlands0.810.44
Merseyside0.560.48
South Yorkshire0.570.51
West Yorkshire0.710.52
Greater Nottingham1.050.69
Maintenance
Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention
LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads
Derby19%28%8%cvi
Leicester13%12%6%cvi
Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner
Greater Bristol8%14%10%?
South Yorkshire8%18%10%?
West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi
Merseyside15%20%18%?
Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi
Greater Manchester19%29%
Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi
Comparative public transport growth in the core cities
core cities public transport
-0.12
-0.11
-0.08
-0.04
-0.03
0.02
0.02
0.08
% change from 2000
core cities KSIs
0.55678670360.35
0.470.43
0.51240.432
0.8050.435
0.56094276090.4767676768
0.57276995310.5148669797
0.70666666670.5166666667
1.05238095240.6888888889
Based upon 2005 population estimates
- 9%
- 16%
- 46%
- 15%
- 10%
- 27%
- 35%
(-9%) = % change
- 37%
1994/98
2005
KSIs per 1,000 resident population
Core Cities KSIs per 1,000 resident population
core cities road condition
0.070.1
0.080.136
0.0810.175
0.0960.229
0.1460.198
0.170.15
0.1870.285
Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only
Principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Road condition where immediate works are required
Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6
pt patronage cha
Public transport patronage
% change
Derby-13%
South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%
West Midlands (312.5m)-11%
Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro
Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram
West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%
Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram
Leicester2%
Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%
Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram
KSIs chart
Road casualties
Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000
Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%
Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%
Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%
Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%
Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%
West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%
Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%
South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%
West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%
Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%
Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%
CORE CITIES
1994/982005
Tyne and Wear0.560.35
Greater Bristol0.470.43
Greater Manchester0.510.43
West Midlands0.810.44
Merseyside0.560.48
South Yorkshire0.570.51
West Yorkshire0.710.52
Greater Nottingham1.050.69
Maintenance
Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention
LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads
Derby19%28%8%cvi
Leicester13%12%6%cvi
Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner
Greater Bristol8%14%10%?
South Yorkshire8%18%10%?
West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi
Merseyside15%20%18%?
Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi
Greater Manchester19%29%
Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi
Comparative road safety performance in the core cities
core cities public transport
-0.12
-0.11
-0.08
-0.04
-0.03
0.02
0.02
0.08
% change from 2000
core cities KSIs
0.55678670360.35
0.470.43
0.51240.432
0.8050.435
0.56094276090.4767676768
0.57276995310.5148669797
0.70666666670.5166666667
1.05238095240.6888888889
- 9%
- 16%
- 46%
- 15%
- 10%
- 27%
- 35%
(-9%) = % change
- 37%
1994/98
2005
KSIs per 1,000 resident population
core cities road condition
0.070.1
0.080.136
0.0810.175
0.0960.229
0.1460.198
0.170.15
0.1870.285
Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only
Principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Road condition where immediate works are required
Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6
pt patronage cha
Public transport patronage
% change
Derby-13%
South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%
West Midlands (312.5m)-11%
Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro
Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram
West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%
Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram
Leicester2%
Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%
Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram
KSIs chart
Road casualties
Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000
Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%
Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%
Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%
Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%
Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%
West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%
Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%
South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%
West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%
Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%
Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%
CORE CITIES
1994/982005
Tyne and Wear0.560.35
Greater Bristol0.470.43
Greater Manchester0.510.43
West Midlands0.810.44
Merseyside0.560.48
South Yorkshire0.570.51
West Yorkshire0.710.52
Greater Nottingham1.050.69
Maintenance
Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention
LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads
Derby19%28%8%cvi
Leicester13%12%6%cvi
Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner
Greater Bristol8%14%10%?
South Yorkshire8%18%10%?
West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi
Merseyside15%20%18%?
Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi
Greater Manchester19%29%
Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi
Comparative child road safety performance in the core cities
core cities public transport
-0.12
-0.11
-0.08
-0.04
-0.03
0.02
0.02
0.08
% change from 2000
Core Cities Public Transport Patronage & Growth Over LTP1 Period
core cities KSIs
0.55678670360.35
0.470.43
0.51240.432
0.8050.435
0.56094276090.4767676768
0.57276995310.5148669797
0.70666666670.5166666667
1.05238095240.6888888889
Based upon 2005 population estimates
- 9%
- 16%
- 46%
- 15%
- 10%
- 27%
- 35%
(-9%) = % change
- 37%
1994/98
2005
KSIs per 1,000 resident population
Core Cities KSIs per 1,000 resident population
core cities child KSIs
0.74430379750.3392405063
0.32795698920.2311827957
0.59724950880.4027504912
0.76342899190.3844738779
0.75740099960.5574778931
0.61025223760.3864930838
0.63299976730.3095182686
1.03146853150.4895104895
- 54%
- 30%
- 33%
- 50%
- 26%
- 37%
- 51%
- 53%
(-54%) = % change
1994/98
2005
Per 1,000 Child Population
core cities road condition
0.070.1
0.080.136
0.0810.175
0.0960.229
0.1460.198
0.170.15
0.1870.285
Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only
Principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)
Road condition where immediate works are required
Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6
pt patronage cha
Public transport patronage
% change
Derby-13%
South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%
West Midlands (312.5m)-11%
Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro
Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram
West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%
Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram
Leicester2%
Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%
Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram
KSIs chart
Road casualties
Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000Child population2005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000
Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%197,5006714754%9630%
Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%
Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%
Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%186,000436130%5420%
Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%509,00020530433%23613%
West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%543,60020941550%28527%
Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%260,10014519726%1546%
South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%245,8009515037%12222%
West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%429,70013327251%23042%
Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%114,4005611853%10647%
Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%
CORE CITIESKSIsChild KSIs
1994/9820051994/982005
Tyne and Wear0.560.350.740.34
Greater Bristol0.470.430.330.23
Greater Manchester0.510.430.600.40
West Midlands0.810.440.760.38
Merseyside0.560.480.760.56
South Yorkshire0.570.510.610.39
West Yorkshire0.710.520.630.31
Greater Nottingham1.050.691.030.49
Maintenance
Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention
LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads
Derby19%28%8%cvi
Leicester13%12%6%cvi
Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner
Greater Bristol8%14%10%?
South Yorkshire8%18%10%?
West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi
Merseyside15%20%18%?
Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi
Greater Manchester19%29%
Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi
Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportOverall impact satisfaction
94% of tram users satisfiedOver 80% feel measures are effective79% are satisfied with bus services73% satisfied with informationA third cite it as the reason they are satisfied with Nottingham as a place to liveSource: MORI / Operator surveys
Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportProgress towards targets core indicators
AchievedOn Track Not on trackPrincipal road conditionBus passenger journeysCycling tripsNon-principal road conditionNumber of KSIsUnclassified road conditionChild KSIsRural accessibilityTram patronage
Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportProgress towards targets local indicators
AchievedAchievedNot achievedBus quality partnershipsVehicle kilometres travelledBus journey speedsPeak period flowsPeak period flows to the CCCar occupancyPeak period car speedsCommuter plans in placeJourneys to work by bikeCost of city centre parkingJourneys to work on footPopulation walking or cycling for 30 minutes each dayAir quality exceedencesGreenhouse gas emissionsModal share of PT in peakModal share of PT (all)Retail vitalityNumber of bus sheltersPark and ride provisionBrownfield developmentSkylink patronageEasy access buses
The Transport Strategy for Nottingham is marketed to the public under the Big Wheel brandingThe Big Wheel
The Accolades
Transport Local Authorityof the Year 2002-3
Future Vision
Smarter ChoicesPredict and manageInfluencing Travel BehaviourWorkplace Travel PlansSchool Travel PlansTelecommutingHome ShoppingInternet retailingTravel Awareness CampaignsInformation and marketing
Whats new: Accessibility planning
Funding the new NET lines
How do we pay for it?
Transport Innovation Fund (TIF)6 CsInvestigating charging options across region1.8m Supporting Smarter Choices
Still to seek full member approvalPart of a cocktail of funding options availableCity Council area schemeSet to be first scheme in the UK (by scale)Improve public transport and reduce congestionProposed levy on city based employers (approx 500)384 per space per year (provisional)Employers will have option to pay levy or pass on to staffExemptions will apply e.g. small businesses & healthProceeds to be ring fenced for transport improvementsWPL proposed to start no earlier than 2009/10Approx 34,000 liable spaces
Workplace Parking Levy
The Alternatives?Road User Charging Scheme (RUC)?Similar to London schemeEverybody gets charged via num platesPeak timed
Do nothing?Cope with current fund allocationAlternative funding optionsWatch the city grind to a halt?
The Debate
The Debate!BusinessesLarge employersVisitorsMotoristsDevelopersInward investorsRiskPolitical acceptancePublic support
1. Pro WPL2. Pro RUCLocal authoritiesPublic sectorNon motoristsSMEsEmergency servicesUnionsFreight co.Others
xAgainst other options3. The 3rd Way?Business ratesCouncil TaxUse on buses not tramsDo nothingEffect on retailImpact on tourismInward investment
Against other optionsAgainst other options