Upload
susana-torr
View
220
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rowan-Salisbury School District
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan
2010-2011
Focus
“The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities shall be on improving education resultsimproving education results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities. ”
Monitoring Priorities 616(a)(3)
The Secretary shall monitor States and require each state to monitor its LEAs using quantifiable indicators to measure performance in the following areas:
1. FAPE in the LRE 2. Disproportionality 3. Effective General Supervision
State Performance Plan Reporting616(b)(2)(C)
States must annually collect data in these priority areas to analyze the performance of each LEA.
Each state must report annually to the Secretary on its performance under its performance plan.
States must report annually to the public on the performance of each LEA on the identified targets in the state’s performance plan.
Rowan Salisbury Schools Data Story
Indicator 1Graduation
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating
from high school with a regular diploma.
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
80% 63.1% 56.8% 57.3%
Indicator 2Drop Out
Percent of students with IEPs dropping out of high school.
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
6% 9.4% 8.7% 10%
Indicator 3
Assessment
Participation and performance of children with
disabilities on statewide assessment.
RSS did not meet AYP for
the past three years.
Indicator 3Assessment Participation
Reading
Grade State Target
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
3 95 100 98.9 94.5
4 95 99.2 100 97.6
5 95 100 99.5 98.5
6 95 99.5 99.4 98.5
7 95 100 98.4 95.2
8 95 99.5 99.5 96.3
10 95 95.7 77.4 65.1
Indicator 3Assessment Participation
Math
Grade State Target
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
3 95 100 100 94.5
4 95 99.2 100 97.6
5 95 100 99.5 98.5
6 95 99 99.4 97.5
7 95 99.5 97.8 95.2
8 95 99.5 99.5 96.3
10 95 88.4 79.3 65.1
Indicator 3Assessment Performance
Reading
07-08
28.7
24.4
12.9
18.8
13.5
16.6
27.3
Grade
3 43.2
4 43.2
5 43.2
6 43.2
7 43.2
8 43.2
10 38.5
08-09
27.7
35.7
29.0
24.1
26.0
26.1
24.0
09-10
22.6
31.9
29.0
34.7
24.4
32.6
14.8
State Target
RSS Data
Indicator 3Assessment Performance
Math
07-08
48.2
32.7
30.4
23.7
31.8
34.1
46.7
Grade
3 77.2
4 77.2
5 77.2
6 77.2
7 77.2
8 77.2
10 68.4
08-09
50.5
52.9
41.1
38.6
35.0
52.3
37.5
09-10
49.0
47.6
48.5
38.6
41.9
46.7
45.4
State Target
RSS Data
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion
Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater.
State Target 2007-08 = 8% of LEAs
State Target 2008-09 = 8% of LEAs
State Target 2009-10 = 6% of LEAs
State Target was met.
Baseline data was collected for 09-10.
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Percent of children with IEPs aged 6
through 21 served in regular, separate,
or public, private, home or hospital
settings.
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Setting State Target
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Regular >65.6% 74.5 71.4 69.2
Separate <15.3% 17.8 19.1 18.8
Home/Hospital
<2.0% 0.6 0.7 0.9
Indicator 6Least Restrictive Environment
For Preschool
Data for this indicator will be reported for the first time in February 2012.
Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes
Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in:
Positive social-emotional skills,
Acquisition and use of knowledge
Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator 7LEA Data
PK with Improved .
. .
08-09Student changed growth
trajectories in PK Program
08-09 Student was functioning like same aged peers
when exiting PK
09-10Student changed growth
trajectories in PK Program
09-10 Student was functioning like same aged peers
when exiting PK
Social Emotional Skills
100% 44% 99% 63%
Use of Skills
100% 25% 99% 64%
Appropriate
Behavior100% 50% 95% 65%
Indicator 8Parent Involvement
Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities.
State Target: 2009-10 = 40%RSS: 32% when sampled in 07-08
LEAs with less than 50,000 students are surveyed once every 5 years.
Indicator 9Disproportionality in EC
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
State Target - 0% of LEAs
RSS - not disproportional
Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category
Percent of districts with disproportionate
representation of racial and ethnic groups
in specific disability categories that is the
result of inappropriate identification.
State target: 0% of LEAs
RSS: not disproportional
Indicator 1190 Day Timeline
Percent of children referred for whom a
referral was received and placement
determined within 90 days.
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
100% 74.5% 71.6% 92.96%
Indicator 12Part C to Part B
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their third birthday.
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
100% 92.1% 62.1% 79.71%
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
Indicator 13: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition services needs.
There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
100% 97.7% 100% 100%
Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes
• Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:
• A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
• B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
• C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
State Target: baseline data was collected in 2009-10
RSS: was sampled in 2009-10 - 69%
Indicator 15General Supervision
Percent of compliance rate of Internal Record Review
State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
100% 61% 82.7% 100%