Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Rossington
Character Buildings
and Structures of
Local Heritage
Interest -
Supporting
Evidence
Rossington
Neighbourhood Plan
2016 - 2032
January 2020
2
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
1.0 Introduction
This supporting paper explains the background, the methodology used and evidence
supporting the designation of the proposed Rossington Character Buildings and
Structures of Local Heritage Interest in the draft Rossington Neighbourhood Plan.
2.0 Policy Context
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)1 sets out the Government’s planning
policies for England and how these are expected to be applied.
Section 16 (paragraphs 184-201) of the NPPF covers all aspects of the historic
environment. Paragraph 184 makes the Government’s position on heritage very clear,
stating ‘Heritage assets range from sites and buildings of local historic value to those of
the highest significance, such as World Heritage Sites which are internationally
recognised to be of Outstanding Universal Value. These assets are an irreplaceable
resource, and should be conserved in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that
they can be enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of existing and future
generations’.
It also introduces the concept of non-designated heritage assets. A non-designated
heritage asset is a building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as
having a degree of significance, but which is not afforded statutory protection through
Listed Building, Scheduled Monument etc. status; Paragraph of 197 of the National
Planning Policy Framework states, ‘The effect of an application on the significance of a
non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the
application. In weighing applications that directly or indirectly affect non-designated
heritage assets, a balanced judgement will be required having regard to the scale of any
harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset’.
This is developed in Planning Policy Conserving and Enhancing the Historic
Environment Guidance2, which states ‘Where it is relevant, neighbourhood plans need
to include enough information about local heritage to guide decisions and put broader
strategic heritage policies from the Local Plan into action at a neighbourhood scale.
Where it is relevant, designated heritage assets within the plan area should be clearly
identified at the start of the plan-making process so they can be appropriately taken into
account. In addition, and where relevant, neighbourhood plans need to include enough
information about local non-designated heritage assets including sites of archaeological
interest to guide decisions’.
This supporting evidence document identifies heritage assets in the Parish that have
been identified of special local heritage interest to meriting consideration in planning
decisions, but which are not formally designated heritage assets.
The Plan has taken the opportunity, using published good practice guidance from
Historic England3, to identify a schedule of assets that are considered to have significant
3
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
local heritage interest. To ensure that these assets are considered appropriately in
planning proposals, the Plan designates them as Rossington Character Buildings and
Structures of Local Heritage Interest.
An approach which is supported by and in conformity with the Doncaster Core Strategy
(adopted January 2006) which includes several policies which relate to non-designated
heritage assets. These include Section B) of Policy CS 15 Valuing Out Historic
Environment4, which states, ‘proposals will be supported which protect or enhance the
heritage significance and setting of locally identified heritage assets such as buildings
of local architectural or historic interest, locally important archaeological sites and parks
and gardens of local interest’.
3.0 Criteria for the identification of Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest The process and criteria were based on that developed by Historic England in its publication ‘Local Heritage Listing’5 to help establish if any Rossington Character Building and Structures meets the definition set out on local and national planning policy. This was purposefully chosen to ensure a consistent approach, and that it was based on good practice. 4.0 The process for identifying Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest The potential sites were identified through three main sources.
• Firstly, local knowledge gathered through consultation and the views of local specialists in this area;
• Secondly, Historic Environment Records, for example, that contained on the HeritageGateway database6; and
• Thirdly, specialised knowledge, especially from Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council’s Conservation Officer.
From this, a list of potential sites was developed. The proposed sites were then assessed for their appropriateness for designation as
Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest.
Satisfied that they met, in principle, the criteria for going forward as Local Character
Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest, their local significance was tested
through extensive consultation through the Plan preparation process. This included
specific consultation with the owners of the proposed buildings and structures.
1https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 2 https://www.gov.uk/guidance/conserving-and-enhancing-the-historic-environment 3 https://www.historicengland.org.uk/listing/what-is-designation/local/local-designations/ 4http://doncaster.opus3.co.uk/ldf/documents/Core_Strategy/Attractive%2C%20Safe%20and%20Healthy%20Places 5 https://content.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/local-heritage-listing-advice-note-7/heag018-local-heritage-listing.pdf/ 6 https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/gateway/
4
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
5.0 Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest –
Assessment Forms
The following section briefly details how each of the buildings and structures proposed
for designation is special and holds a particular local significance. This is structured
around the relevant criteria developed by Historic England. An indicative photograph is
also provided for each one. A map showing their location can also be found as part of
the main Plan as Figure 6.
Reference and name of Asset
1.Hunster Grange
Location Stripe Road
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
Unknown.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
One of the surviving buildings from Rossington’s agricultural past.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
One of the largest buildings in Rossington, it is of pleasant and striking design. It comprises a farm building with attached buildings. All are similar design and construction of brick and slate. It has an impressive ‘carriage style’ archway entrance.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
There is a possibility of remains. Earlier archaeological investigations to the south of the Farm saw the excavation of two Early Bronze Age ring barrows, one containing two cremations, each within a collared urn.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Not considered to be relevant.
5
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Not considered to be relevant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
Not considered to be relevant.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
There is an impressive entrance across open land to the site.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Not considered to be relevant.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
Not considered to be relevant.
6
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
7
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
2.Rossington Main Colliery Wheel on land next to the
Memorial Hall.
Location Mcconnel Crescent.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
Rossington Main Colliery was sunk in 1913. It is understood that the wheel was introduced roughly at the same time.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
The wheel is symbolic of the importance of the mining industry to the growth and history of Rossington. It is a rare surviving example of a winding wheel. It is one of two such examples in the Parish (see also 3).
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
It consists of half of a colliery wheel on a stone foundation. It is of bespoke design and encompassing a plaque commemorating those who worked in the local mining industry.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
The structure originally formed part of the Rossington Main colliery complex. The colliery was closed in 2006, and little of the original complex remains. This is considered to be the most important physical relics remaining from the Colliery.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Not considered relevant. It is a stand-alone structure.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
There are considerable local records and documents in relation to Rossington Main Colliery and its history.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local
The Wheel is symbolic of an era where coal production was an important source of employment, prosperity and
8
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
or national note, including links to important local figures.
identity. There are no more working coal mines in South Yorkshire, which increases the importance of maintaining heritage. It commemorates the miners' and their families contribution to the village which became known as New Rossington
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
The Wheel is located in a central position next to the parish council offices The Wheel symbolises the importance of the mining industry to the development and identity of Rossington.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
The importance of coal mining locally is reinforced by the continued presence of the Wheel and associated date plaque. The wheel was reclaimed by local people and donated to the community by UK Coal. It is located within a Commemorative Colliery Garden which includes a bench seat and a rubber safety surface surrounding the wheel
9
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
3.Rossington Miners Welfare including clock, plaque and
Rossington Main Colliery Wheel.
Location West End Lane, Rossington.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
It was originally built just after the first world war to serve the growing community of Rossington.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
It is one of the oldest and most visually dominant buildings in the Parish.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
It is primarily of brick construction, with slate roofs. It is of pleasing design and occupies a prominent location in the Parish off the main road through the Village. There is a clock on its roof, which adds to its quality. Located within the grounds is a half of a colliery wheel from the former Rossington Colliery within a stone
10
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
‘plinth’ of bespoke design. This plinth encompasses a plaque commemorating those who worked in the local mining industry.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
It is not considered to be of significant archaeological interest.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Not considered to be especially significant.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
While there are some historic records of the building these are not significant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
The building has been closely associated with the physical, educational and social development of the Parish. Like 2, the colliery wheel is symbolic of an era where coal production was an important source of employment, prosperity and identity. There are no more working coal mines in South Yorkshire, which increases the importance of maintaining the heritage. It commemorates the miners' and their families' contribution to the village which became known as New Rossington
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local
Not considered to be relevant.
11
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
communities for their current use.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
It is considered to be one of the most striking, and of architectural interesting, buildings in the Parish.
Social and communal value
Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
It is a well-known, prized and recognised heritage asset in the Parish.
12
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
4.Former Coop on Kings Avenue including Dovecote, Central Gable and other features.
Location Kings Avenue.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
It was understood that it was built at the beginning of the 20th Century as new Rossington grew following the opening of a coal mine
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
It is one of the oldest and visually dominant buildings in the Parish.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
It is of interesting design with a central gable and dovecote. Its features white render and Mock-Tudor half-timbering details and decorative features including a dovecote.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
It is not considered to be of significant archaeological interest.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship
It is a stand alone building.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
While there are some historic records of the building these are not significant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
The building has been closely associated with the physical and social development of the Parish. Its former use as a co-op adds to its interest.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their
Not considered to be relevant.
13
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
It is a visually dominant building in a prominent location in Rossington Village Centre It is of added significance and importance given the small number prominent buildings in Rossington.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
Many people still remember its use a co-op, and still known collectively as the ‘co-op’ building.
14
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
5.Fountains Cottages opposite Village Pump.
Location Off Station Road.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
While their precise age is
unknown, they are
understood to be one of the
oldest buildings in the
Parish. Maybe 19th Century
in origin.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
They are one of the few
buildings surviving from
Rossington’s pre-mining
heritage. There is some
evidence that names
“Fountain Cottages" may
have their origins in their
location in or close to former
the village fountain - with
water bubbling up from a
spring.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
A pair of semi-detached buildings, they are of interesting and ornate design, including decorative chimney stacks and mock-Tudor half-timbering. They have been relatively unaltered from their original design and construction.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Not considered relevant.
15
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
There is some evidence that names “Fountain Cottages" may have their origins in their location in or close to former the village fountain, which can be found across the road. They are located in what is the historic core of the village.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Not considered to be relevant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
Not considered to be
relevant.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
They are striking buildings in a prominent location off Station Road – the main road running through the village and across the road from the village fountain a listed building.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
They provide a strong visual and historical link to the pre-industrial development of Rossington when it was essentially a small agricultural community centred around St Michael’s Church.
16
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
17
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
6.The Old School House near St Michael’s Church.
Location Off Station Road.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
While their precise age is unknown, they are understood to be one of the oldest buildings in the Parish. Maybe the 19th Century in origin.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
This one of the few buildings surviving from Rossington’s pre-mining heritage.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
This detached building is of similar design to 7, ‘Fountain Cottages’ and may have been designed by the same person. It is of interesting and ornate design, including decorative chimney stacks and mock-Tudor half-timbering. .It has been relatively unaltered from their original design and construction.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
It is not considered to be of significant archaeological interest.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Not considered to be especially significant.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
While there are some historic records of the building, these are not significant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or
Its former use as the village schoolhouse adds to its value and interest.
18
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
national note, including links to important local figures.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
It is considered to be one of the most striking, and of architectural interesting, buildings in the Parish. It is of added significance given its former use as a schoolhouse.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
It is a well-known and recognised heritage asset in the Parish.
19
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
7.The Back and Front Cottages on Littleworth Lane.
Location Littleworth Lane.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
They are understood to be built in the 19th Century.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
They are understood be of the oldest buildings in the Parish.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
They comprise two sets of terraced cottages. They are primarily of brick construction, with pantile roofs. While they have been some alterations, notably to the ‘Front Cottages’ they retain much of their original design, features and charm.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
It is not considered to be of significant archaeological interest.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
They are a group of 4 houses of similar and relatively uniform design.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Magilton 1977 in his study ‘The Doncaster District: An Archaeological Survey’. considered them to be of interest.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures
The buildings provide a strong visual and historic relic of the pre-industrial development of Rossington when Littleworth was a
20
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
distinct small agricultural hamlet.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Not considered to be relevant.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
They provide a strong visual and historical link to the pre-industrial development of Littleworth (and the wider Rossington) when it was essentially a small agricultural hamlet distinct and stand-alone hamlet.
21
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
22
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
23
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
8.The Old Rectory on Littleworth Lane.
Location Off Littleworth Lane.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
It is understood to be one of the oldest buildings in the Parish
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
Not considered to be relevant
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
Two storey building with single storey building to the side and a two storey extension to its back. It is of pleasing design and retains many of its original design and features.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Not considered to be relevant.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Not considered to be relevant.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Not considered to be relevant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
Its former use as the rectory adds to its value and distinctiveness.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to
Not considered to be relevant.
24
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Not considered to be relevant.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
It provides a visual link and connection with the historical form and development of the Parish.
25
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
9.The Bunker on Stripe Road.
Location Off Stripe Road.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
It is understood to have been built in the early 1960’s. It opened in 1963.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
It is a rare example of an underground bunker built during the Cold War to protect key services. It is largely unchanged from its original construction. It was closed in 1991.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
Apart from a ventilation shaft, it is mainly built underground.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Yes, it is likely that it may include remains of archaeological and heritage interest. It is understood that much of its interior design and relics are still remaining including tables, shelves, posters etc. Parts of it has suffered from vandalism and neglect.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
It is a stand-alone building.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
While there has been some written records, there is relatively little documentary evidence.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
The building is closely associated with the cold war era period. It is a rare example of a secret underground bunker.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens
Not considered to be relevant.
26
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Its strong association with the cold war era means that it is considered to be a landmark building.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
It is an important and much-prized asset. As a piece of Cold War history and the role of Rossington within it.
27
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset 10. Littleworth Mews Cottages.
Location Littleworth Mews, Off Littleworth Lane.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
Their exact age is unknown.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
A rare local example of estate type buildings.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
A row of buildings comprising a terrace of uniform estate type style buildings together with attached buildings. They are of a similar building style of brick and slate roofs. They are of interesting, pleasant and ornate design with two decorative chimney stacks. They are relatively unaltered from their original design. They are of some interest and charm.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Yes, the four buildings are of similar design.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Not considered to be relevant.
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant
Not considered to be relevant.
28
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Not considered to be relevant.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
Not considered to be relevant.
29
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Reference and name of Asset
11. Mount Pleasant Cottages
Location Stripe Road.
How it meets the criteria
Criterion Description Notes
Age The age of an asset may be an important criterion and the age range can be adjusted to take into account distinctive local characteristics.
Unknown thought to be the 19th Century.
Rarity Appropriate for all assets, as judged against local characteristics.
One of the surviving buildings from Rossington’s agricultural past.
Aesthetic Value The intrinsic design value of an asset relating to local styles, materials or any other distinctive local characteristics.
The two sets of paired estate cottages are important to the history and character of Rossington. There are two symmetrical designs, indicating their date of construction, with one set understood to be built earlier than the other one. Each is of brick construction with tile roofs. They are of pleasant and striking design and retain many of their original design and features. The earlier set is of a more simpler design; the latter set is larger and more ornate in design.
Archaeological interest The local heritage asset may provide evidence about past human activity in the locality, which may be archaeological – that is in the form of buried remains – but may also be revealed in the structure of buildings or in a manmade landscape. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Not considered to be of special significance.
Group Value Groupings of assets with a clear visual, design or historic relationship.
Their relationship with the nearby Rossington Hall adds to their value and interest.
Archival Interest The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant contemporary or historic written record.
Not considered to be relevant.
30
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
Historic Association The significance of a local heritage asset of any kind may be enhanced by a significant historical association of local or national note, including links to important local figures.
They were originally built to provide accommodation for workers at the nearby Rossington Hall (a Listed Building). Up to the 1930s they formed part of the Hall estate.
Designed landscapes The interest attached to locally important historic designed landscapes, parks and gardens which may relate to their design or social history. This may complement a local green space designation, which provides special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities for their current use.
Not considered to be relevant.
Landmark status An asset with strong communal or historical associations, or because it has especially striking aesthetic value, may be singled out as a landmark within the local scene.
Not considered to be relevant.
Social and communal value Relating to places perceived as a source of local identity, distinctiveness, social interaction and coherence; often residing in intangible aspects of heritage contributing to the “collective memory” of a place.
Not considered to be relevant.
31
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020
32
Rossington Neighbourhood Plan – Rossington Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest Supporting Evidence – January 2020