Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science.

2011 Continuous Improvement Report for the Pine Island School District

2010-2011 Pine Island School District Goals 

1.  High Student Achievement Test scores Aligned curriculum Staff development

           2.  Create and Maintain a Collaborative Work Environment

Community Interpersonal communication with district Parents/Students Teams and individuals (mentoring)

           

3.  Effective and Efficient Operation Financial management Building/Transportation maintenance Staffing levels – Staffing to Workload

High Student Achievement DataHigh Student Achievement Data MCA AimsWeb ACT NWEA

District 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10Eng Math Read Sci Comp Eng Math Read Sci Comp

Byron 23.2 24.2 23.7 23.8 23.9 22.8 24.7 23.6 24 23.9Cannon Falls 22.2 23.2 23.2 22.8 23 22.7 23.2 23.7 22.6 23.2Goodhue 19.9 20.6 20.5 21.6 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.8 21.3 21.5Hayfield 20.8 20 23.2 22.5 21.8 23 23.2 23.9 23.1 23.5Kasson-Mantorville 21.9 22.3 22.8 23 22.6 23 23.5 23.5 23 23.4Kenyon-Wanamingo 19.7 21.3 21.9 21.5 21 21.4 21.4 21.7 21.2 21.5Lake City 20.9 22.2 22.6 22.5 22.2 21.6 23.1 22.5 22.7 22.6LaCrescent 23.5 24.2 23.9 24 24 24 24.3 24.1 23.7 24.2Pine Island 22.1 23.1 23.7 23.5 23.3 22.9 23.6 23.9 23.5 23.7Stewartville 22.8 23.6 23.7 23.9 23.7 21.8 22.1 22.2 22.1 22.2Triton 21.7 22.3 22.2 23 22.4Zumbrota-Mazeppa 22.4 22.9 23.7 22.9 23.1 22.6 22.8 23.9 22.7 23.2HVL 21.8 22.5 23.0 22.9 22.7 20.7 21.2 21.3 21.0 21.2State Average 22 22.7 23.1 22.6 22.7 22.3 22.9 23.2 22.8 22.9

Grade 7 2010District % Meets % Exceeds CombinedPine Island 37.4 51.6 89.0K-M 47.6 36.6 84.2PEM 40.9 39.1 80.0Stewartville 53.5 25.0 78.5Byron 53.0 24.8 77.8Rochester 40.7 35.2 75.9Z-M 43.6 30.8 74.4Hayfield 42.6 26.2 68.8Kingsland 45.0 20.0 65.0Statewide 40.5 23.9 64.4Chatfield 38.7 24.2 62.9Dover-Eyota 26.9 24.4 51.3Triton 40.4 9.6 50.0

Av. Score

ZM 0.762 756.7

Kasson 75.6% 756.9

Byron 75.4% 759.0

Rochester 73.2% 757.8

Kingsland 69.8% 755.7

Stewartville 68.2% 755.6

Pine Island 66.2% 755.8

Cannon Falls 64.6% 752.4

Lake City 63.6% 754.2

State 62.6% 753.1

Chatfield 60.6% 752.3

Kenyon-W 60.3% 751.4

Triton 60.3% 751.6

Dover-Eyota 59.8% 751.9

Goodhue 55.3% 750.7

Hayfield 53.8% 751.2

2009 Grade 7 Math

Pass % Av. Score

Pine Island 78.79% 759.55

Kasson 76.03% 759.14

Rochester 73.04% 758.18

Stewartville 72.66% 756.04

Dover-Eyota 70.41% 755.14

Byron 68.55% 754.35

Lake City 67.37% 754.22

Chatfield 66.67% 755.35

ZM 65.82% 754.32

State 61.40% 752.81

Kenyon-W 58.21% 750.49

Kingsland 58.18% 751.33

Cannon Falls 58.16% 751.24

Goodhue 56.82% 751.23

Triton 52.87% 749.15

2008 Grade 7 Math

Grade 5 2010.0District % Meets % ExceedsCombinedZ-M 47.6 42.9 90.5Byron 40.4 49.5 89.9K-M 42.9 39.1 82.0Stewartville 31.5 46.8 78.3Rochester 35.7 41.4 77.1Dover-Eyota 40.2 33.0 73.2Kingsland 48.8 20.9 69.7Statewide 36.5 32.1 68.6PEM 40.4 22.8 63.2Chatfield 36.4 22.7 59.1Hayfield 46.8 10.6 57.4Triton 41.6 13.0 54.6Pine Island 36.9 12.6 49.5

Pass % Av. Score

Kasson 92.7% 462.4

Hayfield 90.7% 461.8

Byron 90.1% 461.8

ZM 88.0% 458.9

Rochester 82.4% 460.5

Goodhue 82.3% 457.3

Kenyon-W 79.2% 461.0

Dover-Eyota 78.7% 458.5

Pine Island 77.5% 456.0

Kingsland 76.2% 455.8

Triton 75.4% 457.0

State 74.8% 457.5

Stewartville 73.0% 458.9

Cannon Falls 70.3% 455.8

Lake City 69.5% 454.1

2009 Grade 4 MathPass % Av. Score

Pine Island 94.50% 361.72

Hayfield 92.86% 358.90

Kasson 91.98% 361.31

Kenyon-W 91.30% 366.43

Stewartville 89.52% 363.35

ZM 88.89% 362.74

Rochester 87.57% 362.28

Goodhue 87.50% 359.29

Lake City 85.86% 359.58

Byron 85.32% 361.01

Triton 85.19% 360.23

Chatfield 82.35% 358.40

State 81.36% 359.11

Kingsland 80.95% 357.31

Dover-Eyota 79.17% 357.24

Cannon Falls 75.28% 356.53

2008 Grade 3 Math

““Confront the Brutal Facts”—Jim CollinsConfront the Brutal Facts”—Jim Collins

1) Test scores—are we “data rich”2) Aligned curriculum?3) Staff development?

Adopt “Stretch Goals” to support the District Goals (a goal funnel)

To place among the top six RAMSP schools for math, reading, and science in all tested grades 3-12 (the analogy to True Team Track—not first and last but sustained high consistency)

School # sec. av. # sec. av. # sec. av. # sec. av. # sec. av. # sec. av. # sec. av.

Kasson-M 175 9 19.4 164 8 20.5 150 7 21.4 177 8 22.1 170 7 24.3 170 7 24.3 170 7 24.3Stewartville 178 8 22.3 138 6 23.0 148 6 24.7 146 6 24.3 145 6 24.2 130 5 26.0 124 5 24.8Byron 136 7 19.4 153 7 21.9 147 6 24.5 121 5 24.2 141 5 28.2 148 5 29.6 117 4 29.25Lake City 84 5 16.8 102 5 20.4 91 5 18.2 102 4 25.5 107 4 26.8 100 4 25.0 106 4 26.5Pine Island 82 4 20.5 108 5 21.6 100 5 20.0 90 4 22.5 91 4 22.8 98 4 24.5 110 4 27.5Triton 123 5 24.6 87 4 21.8 98 4 24.5 96 4 24.0 93 4 23.3 78 3 26.0 82 4 20.5Cannon Falls 78 4 19.5 83 4 20.8 90 4 22.5 85 4 21.3 82 4 20.5 85 4 21.3 89 4 22.25La Crescent 74 3 24.7 86 4 21.5 72 3 24.0 81 3 27.0 75 3 25.0 83 3 27.7 78 3 26.0Zumbrota-M 78 4 19.5 75 4 18.8 84 4 21.0 75 3 25.0 74 3 24.7 84 4 21.0 63 3 21.0Kenyon-W 57 3 19.0 63 3 21.0 50 2.5 20.0 65 2.5 26.0 60 3 20.0 69 3 23.0 72 3 24.0Hayfield 62 3 20.7 55 3 18.3 54 3 18.0 63 3 21.0 59 3 19.7 71 3 23.7 46 2 23.0Goodhue 46 2 23.0 57 3 19.0 52 3 17.3 36 2 18.0 53 2 26.5 40 2 20.0 57 2 28.5

Public Schools 998 48 20.8 1007 48 21.0 986 45.5 21.7 960 40.5 23.7 980 41 23.9 986 40 24.7 944 38 24.8

Sixth GradeKindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Fourth Grade Fifth Grade

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

97.1 ZM 87.3 Albany 90.5 ZM 85.2 ZM 89.0 PI 72.0 Byron 65.6 Byron

92.2 Kimball 86.8 Byron 89.9 Byron 83.4 Morris 84.2 KM 71.3 KM 59.6 Watertn91.5 Barnes 85.4 Stewie 86.6 Watertn 81.0 Byron 80.6 Morris 70.3 ZM 58.4 Albany89.9 Stewie 83.5 Barnes 86.0 Kimball 76.2 Albany 80.0 PEM 69.2 Watertn 55.3 KM

89.6 Watertn 82.7 Kimball 82.1 Barnes 75.4 PEM 78.6 Rockf'd 68.1 Barnes 52.7 ZM

89.2 KM 82.4 KM 82.0 KM 74.6 Rockf'd 78.5 Stewie 67.5 PEM 52.4 Stewie

88.9 PI 81.3 ZM 78.3 Stewie 74.4 Stewie 77.8 Byron 67.5 Albany 51.7 PI

88.5 Albany 79.6 PI 77.5 Rockf'd 71.8 Barnes 74.4 ZM 64.3 PI 44.2 PEM

87.8 Byron 77.0 Rockf'd 76.4 Albany 71.7 Kimball 73.4 Albany 62.6 Stewie 43.2 State

82.9 Rockf'd 77.0 State 68.6 State 71.4 Watertn 71.2 Barnes 60.9 Rockf'd 37.1 Barnes82.8 State 76.8 Watertn 66.3 Morris 68.9 State 68.7 Watertn 58.5 State 36.7 Morris80.7 Morris 76.5 Morris 63.2 PEM 67.0 KM 64.4 State 50.6 Morris 36.6 Rockf'd79.6 PEM 67.7 PEM 49.5 PI 65.4 PI 57.8 Kimball 46.8 Kimball 25.8 Kimball

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10

94.2 ZM 86.1 Byron 92.7 Byron 89.4 Byron 85.4 PEM 81.0 PI 94.3 Barnes91.0 Byron 80.8 Albany 89.0 KM 86.2 ZM 84.6 PI 81.0 Byron 87.2 Byron

88.5 Stewie 79.2 Rockf'd 88.7 ZM 83.3 PI 80.2 Byron 79.0 ZM 84.8 KM

88.0 KM 78.6 Stewie 88.4 Kimball 80.4 Kimball 80.1 KM 78.7 Watertn 84.8 ZM

87.1 Albany 78.6 KM 87.5 Barnes 79.5 Rockf'd 76.4 Morris 78.2 Barnes 83.3 Kimball83.0 Barnes 77.0 Kimball 84.5 Albany 76.2 KM 75.6 ZM 77.9 KM 83.2 PEM

81.2 Morris 74.7 Watertn 83.9 Stewie 74.6 Barnes 74.6 Rockf'd 69.6 Kimball 82.6 Morris80.2 Watertn 74.6 Barnes 82.4 Rockf'd 72.6 PEM 73.0 Stewie 69.5 Albany 82.4 PI

78.9 PI 72.5 State 77.2 PEM 71.7 State 68.7 Kimball 69.2 PEM 81.1 Albany76.5 Kimball 72.4 PI 76.4 State 71.6 Morris 66.9 Albany 69.2 Stewie 79.4 Watertn76.3 State 72.0 KM 75.9 PI 71.5 Watertn 66.1 State 69.1 Rockf'd 78.6 Stewie

75.8 PEM 69.9 PEM 78.8 Watertn 71.4 Albany 62.7 Barnes 68.1 State 75.3 State

70.5 Rockf'd 62.8 Morris 68.3 Morris 64.8 Stewie 59.8 Watertn 57.9 Morris 70.4 Rockf'd

Grade 5 Grade 8 HS

73.9 KM 68.4 KM 71.4 PEM

70.7 Byron 66.7 Byron 70.4 Byron

67.8 ZM 65.1 PI 67.8 ZM

64.6 Albany 58.8 Stewie 66.4 Albany62.0 Stewie 58.7 Watertn 65.5 Watertn61.5 Watertn 58.5 ZM 64.7 PI

60.7 Barnes 55.4 Albany 62.8 Stewie

57.6 Rockf'd 54.2 PEM 62.3 Morris55.8 Kimball 53.6 Barnes 55.8 Barnes54.5 PI 51.1 Kimball 55.4 KM

50.0 Morris 47.9 State 55.0 Kimball46.0 State 47.7 Rockf'd 51.8 State

43.8 PEM 39.5 Morris 35.1 Rockf'd

We are searching for our data to provide evidence to better support the concept that what we are providing for students in Pine Island is a quality education.

Putting our data to better use in developing formative (common or mutual) assessments within our district or using friends and partners in the RAMSP or HVL organizations.

With a stronger focus on data, improving alignment of standards to curriculum, two established comparison groups, and an improved focus on student achievement for Staff Development we are excited to see where the Continuous Improvement Process can take us in 2011-12.

Attempt to develop better K-8 schedule to honor common planning time

Attempt to improve alignment of SD requests to better support the concept of increasing Student Achievement

We have contacted SSC to organize “AYP” summer and/or workshop training on three things: alignment, alignment, alignment.

Alignment of curriculum to standards, alignment of assessment to curriculum, and the development of formative assessments to support and monitor the progress of instruction towards summative assessments like the MCAs .