Upload
nguyentuong
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ricardo HausmannProfessor, Harvard University
Middle Income Countries:Is there such a thing as best practice development strategy?
Ricardo HausmannCenter for International DevelopmentHarvard University
Mixed growth performance of middle income countries 1985-2005
AGOALB
ARE
ARGAUSAUT
BDI
BEL
BENBFA
BGD
BGRBHR
BLZ
BOL BRA
BW A
CAF
CANCHE
CHL
CHN
CIV CMRCOG
COL
COM
CPV CRIDEUDNK
DOM
DZAECU
EGYESP
EST
ETHFINFJI FRA
GAB
GBR
GEO
GHA
GMB
GNB
GRCGTMGUY
HKG
HND
HTI
HUN
IDNIND
IRL
IRNISLISRITAJAM
JOR
JPN
KEN KIR
KOR
KWTLAO LKA
LSO
LUX
LVA
MAC
MAR
MDA
MDG
MEXMLI
MLT
MNG
MOZ
MRT
MUS
MWI
MYS
NAM
NER
NGA
NIC
NLDNORNPLNZL
PAKPAN
PERPHL
PNG
PRT
PRY ROMRWA
SAU
SDN
SEN
SGP
SLBSLE
SLVSUR
SVK SWESWZ SYCSYR
TCD
TGO
THA
TJK
TONTTOTUNTURUGA
URY USAVCT
VEN
VNM
VUT
WSM
ZAF
ZAR
ZMB
ZWE
-.05
0.0
5.1
6 7 8 9 10 11LYPPPK
G20YPCLCU Fitted valuesZERO
GDP per capita PPP in 2005
Gro
wth
in 1
985-
2005
…some are catching up, many are not 1985-2005
ALB
ARE
ARGAUSAUTBEL
BGR
BHR
BLZ
BRA
BWA
CAN
CHE
CHL
CHN
COL
CPV CRIDEUDNK
DOM
DZA
ESPEST
FINFJI FRA
GAB
GBRGRC
GTM
HKG
HUN
IRL
IRNISLISRITA
JOR
JPN
KIR
KOR
KWT
LKA
LUX
LVA
MAC
MARMEX
MLT
MUSMYS
NAM
NLDNOR
NZLPANPER
PHL
PRT
PRY ROM SAU
SGP
SLVSUR
SVK SWESWZ SYC
THA
TON
TTOTUNTURURY USA
VCT
VEN
WSM
ZAF
-.02
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8
8 9 10 11LYPPPK
G20YPCLCU Fitted valuesZERO
GDP per capita PPP in 2005
Gro
wth
in 1
985-
2005
…although the more recent performance is encouraging 2000-2005
AREARG
AUS
AUTBEL
BGR
BHR
BLR
BLZ
BRA
BWA
CAN
CHE
CHL
CHN
COLCPV
CRI
CZE
DEUDNK
DOM
DZA
ESP
EST
FINFJI
FRA
FSMGAB
GBR
GRCHKG
HRVHUN
IRLIRN
ISL
ISRITA
JOR
JPN
KAZ
KORKW T
LBN
LTU
LUX
LVA
MAC
MEXMKD
MLT
MUSMYS
NAM
NLD
NOR
NZLPANPER
POL
PRT
ROM RUS
SAUSGP
SURSVK
SVN
SW E
THA
TON
TTO
TUNTUR
UKR
URY
USAVCT
VEN
WSM
ZAF
0.0
5.1
8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11LYPPPK
G5YPCLCU ZERO
GDP per capita PPP in 2005
Gro
wth
in 2
000-
2005
How can a country grow faster than the rest?
Faster steady-state growth is an oxymoronIf a country grows faster than the world, its exports will be growing faster than world imports
Which will tend to depress their export priceIts imports will be growing faster than world exports
Which will increase the import priceSo its terms of trade will move against it, causing growth to slow down
Take, for example the case of China, Korea and India
Korea
China
India8090
100
110
120
130
Net
bar
ter t
erm
s of
trad
e (2
000
= 10
0)'(W
DI)
2007
1990 1995 2000 2005year
So how do some countries sustain growth?
Because countries shift out of what they currently produce
Development is not about more of the same
Rich countries produce rich-country goods…
Implications
Countries do not seem to become rich by producing more of the same
They change what they produceSophistication = how rich are the countries with which you are competingIf they are poorer, does it mean that you are “wrongly” specialized and will pay for it?…or does it instead make it easier for them to grow?
Initial export sophistication “causes” future growth
e( g
row
thgd
p | X
,lexp
y199
2 ) +
b*le
xpy1
992
lexpy1992
Residuals Linear prediction
8.10487 9.83871
.31443
.429625
MDG
PRY
BGD
JAMECU
BOL LCA
LKA
COL
HTI
PER
KEN
IDN
BLZ
CHL
DZASAU
OMNTUR
TTO
IND
GRC
ROM
THA
CYP
CHN
HRV
PRTMYS
BRA
HUN
AUS
MEX
ESP
KOR
NZL
SGP
NLD
CANUSADNKSWE
DEU
IRL
FIN ISL
CHE
Quality improvements and convergence
Do countries systematically upgrade within the same products?Based on Hwang (2007)
Traditional neo-classical growth theory predicts that poor countries should grow faster (convergence)
The standard correction
This is called the failure of unconditional convergenceArgument: if you condition on a country’s other characteristics
Education, institutions, infrastructure, etc. …then you get conditional convergence …at a speed of about 1.5 to 2 percent per year
Within product distance to the quality frontier
Using a large dataset of exports (6000 products), Hwang calculates the average distance to the quality frontier in each of the products a country exportsDistance to the quality frontier is based on the price at which countries are able to sell their products
The lower the observed price, the lower the implied unobserved quality
He calculates a weighted national average
There is unconditional convergence given the within-product quality distance to the frontier (Hwang 2006)
The evolution of within-product quality (Hwang 2006)
Quality in any particular product converges to the frontier at a rate of 5-6% per yearThis happens unconditionallyCountries that are further away from the quality frontier grow fasterWhen a country enters a new product, it tends to enter at a lower qualityTherefore, the development of new products creates more room for within-product quality upgrading, and subsequently faster growthJumping between products seems to be the difficult part
Unit Value Gaps, 2000Different regions and countries exhibit very different unit value gaps
150%
170%
190%
210%
230%
250%
270%
290%
UR
Y
TUR
BRA
HU
N
ARG
RO
M
CH
L
CH
N
MEX
POL
MYS CZE
AFR
LAC
SAS
MN
A
ECA
EAP
Fast!!
Risky, difficult
Arrive at lowerbranches
How close are the next products from the current areas of specialization?
In a series of papers Hausmann and Klinger looked at the product space and measured the distance between any pair of productsWith physicist Albert-Laszlo Barabasi and Cesar Hidalgo they have mapped the “product space”
How to visualize the product space?
First connect each tree to its nearest neighbor
Step 1: Maximum Spanning Tree
Step 2: Overlay Strong Links
0.4 >
0.4 – 0.55
0.55 – 0.65
0.65 <
Nodes sized according to PRODY, darker links are stronger (red is strongest)
Step 3: Insert Products
Average Paths vs. GDP per capita (logs), 2000
ALB
ARG
ARM
AUS
AUT
AZE
BDI
BEN
BFA
BGDBLRBOL
BRA
CAF
CAN
CHL
CHN
CIV
CMR
COL
CZEDEU
DNK
DOM
DZA
ECU
EGY
ESP
ETH
FIN
GBR
GEO
GHA
GIN
GRC
GTM
HKG
HND
HRV
HTI
HUNIDN
IND
IRL
IRN
ISR
ITA
JAM
JPN
KAZKEN
KGZ
KOR
LBNLKA
LTU
LVAMARMDA
MDG
MEX
MLI
MOZ
MWI
MYS
NERNGA
NIC
NLD
NOR
NPL
NZL
PAKPER
PHL
PNG
POL
PRT
PRY
ROM
RUS
RWA
SAUSDN
SEN
SGP
SLE
SLV
SVK SWE
SYR
TGO
THA
TJK
TKM
TUR
TZA
UGA
UKR
URY
USA
VEN
ZAF
ZMB
ZWE
01
23
4ln
avgp
aths
6 7 8 9 10 11lngdppcppp
How close are the nearby products?
SAUGAB
IRN
DZAGMB
WSMTTOISL
RW A
UGA
NGA
NIC
ECU
FJI
CMRBDICAF
SLV
VEN
GUY
SLE
PRY
BOLPNG
TGO
BFAGHA
SYR
EGY
MUS
NOR
BLZ
AUSMWIBEN
CRI
CIV
NZL
CYP
CANGTM
MDG
KNA
HND
JOR
CHL
MLT
ZAF
HKG
SENPANARG
JAMCOLMEX
MYS
GRCISR
SDN
USAFIN
DOM
PER
SGP
MNGNER
DNK
URYALBNLDJPNSWE
MLI
LKA
AUT
PRTBGD
GBR
IDN
HTI
ITA
IRL
MARETH
BRAKEN
ESPNPL
PHLHUN
KOR
TUR
BGR
THA
PAK
MOZ
IND
CHN-.0
4-.0
20
.02
.04
.06
e( G
R85
_04
| X )
-2 -1 0 1 2e( OPEN_FOREST85 | X )
coef = .00986907, se = .00193109, t = 5.11
The better connected grow faster: initial connectedness and growth 1985-2005
Implications
Countries face very different opportunities for sustained growthSpace for quality improvement within existing productsEase to move to new productsThis calls for very different strategies
Let it be
It ain’t broke
Ample space to movein all directions
Stairway to heaven
Parsimonious industrial policy
Help jump short distances to other products
Bridge over troubled waters
Strategic bets
Little space to improve quality and few nearby trees
Hey Jude: make it better
Competitiveness policyImprove the quality of what
already exists
Space to improve quality
Eas
e to
jum
p to
new
pro
duct
s: o
pen
fore
st
Low High
Low
High
Let it be
It ain’t broke
Ample space to movein all directions
Stairway to heaven
Parsimonious industrial policy
Help jump short distances to other products
Bridge over troubled waters
Strategic betsEl Salvador, Algeria,
ParaguayLittle space to improve quality
and few nearby trees
Hey Jude: make it better
Competitiveness policyImprove the quality of what
already exists
Space to improve quality
Eas
e to
jum
p to
new
pro
duct
s: o
pen
fore
st
Low High
Low
HighChina, Korea, PolandArgentina, Colombia, South Africa