RI rpt, v2 - appendices (final) · 2019-06-14 · 1331 17th Street, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202 CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee . ... Natural Gamma Log CDM-1 Electric Well Log Depth

POOR LEGIBILITY

ONE OR MORE PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE DIFFICULT TO READ DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee

c

r c c,

C, C Q

C

City of Fresno Fresno Sanitary Landfill

Remedial Investigation Report Volume II - Appendices

May 20, 1994

SFUND RECORDS CTR

88111952

L j

City of Fresno Fresno Sanitary Landfill Remedial Investigation Report Volume II - Appendices

May 20, 1994

Prepared for:

City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, Califomia 93721

Prepared by:

Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, Califomia 94596

and

1331 17th Street, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202

C D M Camp Dresser &. McKee

Contents — Volume II

Appendix A Site Geology A-1 Geophysical Logs A-2 Geologic Logs A-3 Grain-Size Distribution Curves

Appendix B Site Hydrology B-1 Well Completion Diagrams B-2 Regional Water Level Maps (1972-1992) B-3 Water Level Time Trends B-4 Irrigation Data B-5 Leachate Investigation Data B-6 Aquifer Test Evaluations

Appendix C

Appendix D

Soil Gas Model

Groundwater Model

C D M Camp Dresser &. McKee 2416-112\IM\RIRT\FINAUT0C-II 05/20/94 let

\ •' ", ,-T- A

>

13 .

jl,—,- ; •" • .. . I -

•?.*5-b''>-"'''V.''.

Site Geology

CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee

. . ' ·.~

·'· ,.·· (·.,

'I._::·,

' ' '.. : ~

.....

··J,'

"·.· ~ ,·

.., ... '

~. ' '

'~ '

' •I'

'.·.,. '•i ·.·..,

. ~l " .~·

\' :·' '' ·,··

,' .. ·'

r·,J

.:,·

\ · .. · :·.·, ·:·\ ,;'"!-·'/:.·

., .•. .!'

r· ·,

'·' '·

•,,.>.._

'; ::

·.~-, ' (. (

'' ~ ' .·: ..

'\ ~. ~' . '.

· ....

,· _,..}<·.::

. ~ ~ .,-.

l '

~ .::) .. .·.,.

•. _') ., • :. ··, .. ' l ' . •.' • '';. - ""'' . ~

. / . .' .-... 1',,

'.-~;: ::App~hd·ix :·A-:{:··,· .. :· .. ' '? :': e,¢¢PhY~!GetiJ-89$ ,

- .r· .. ~··· '-:·~:~-::.~~··'

In , ' ,, . '

·~·. :·,·. '. '

.·,. . ; ~ ;, ...... '

.. l· ..

. '',

'•

\ '.- ~ . .. _ .. ' ~~: . ·.:

,•

··' '

' '

• .r ·-~ ·, '.;'

)'·'

1 • ~~~' ~· r'•. I

f.:'."" j

y ; . ,•, .;

'. :. :·· ·' \

f' ·~-' .

.' ... -

· .. :,· ~ .,

..... ·-·

'-:'

·' ·'

.. . ~ ,~ ..

·' '!· <;>;····

.. 1- '11. ';\:

•,' •,,f.

·• \

' ,,-. ,~ j

. ,• '1 ·, ·. }. ~ ...

' r,

~ ·: : ' '·'

Natural Gamma Log CDM-1 Electric Well Log

Depth in

Feet

100

120

140

ICO

ISO

200

220

240

2SS

^1 • 1

i > .1 •••

::: • • .'i.':

> i

• - t' ::''. v^«,

, « i

• • • • i •**

....

.}} ' • • si

*. ' 1 ' \ '* T i

• • V

|[>

Natural Gamma Log C D M - 2 Electric Well Log

)epth in

Feet

i


Depth in

Feet

+ 1

t tmn-n j% q (iMtt-n t-t

>Cl<Fl» H V K C g pin-n r ••

" " i fwil i ' .



Depth in

Feet

+ 9

n -.••it-ii , ' •


3th

et r

Depth in

Feet

i ttUtUl

0

s r .:

(0

10O

120

KO

160

180

200

220

240

2S2


·',• ·.,:r-·

' ',~;-!' ~-'

\'I >o'

''· ,_, ...... , "· ·;~---··.

. r;,!

' ~. /, . -...

.. . ~' ... '- ~.

·: ~'I I

"- ... ~--- l.

•• <

; ,,•,•

-~) -...

. . ',._ ~

·'·

_. __ ._._.

·.'

' \ --·~,

·'"'· l_r'_~-,. !!, } • ·'

·,....,

.~'-. t,'

... ., " , .. ~

'! ·,' -.. ··-

-~ .. -.. ·.,

! ' : .~ ··1

.. ' ·~ . '

···'"\!• .·"<,.;,

• L ri~rJI~~a~p·o~~sser :& ¥cK~i ~ : ~. : '• .._ ,~ "·.<- .•. ...:.~<:, ;~;,: ; .,~, I •'

c'

.,r-·

-~-i ·<,' '':..''

)'-•' ·' . . J ·:; .:

.~

.) ·.,.

f. '__!, -'· ~

·-'

. -.· ~. -' .

/',

'\.

·- .' . ~ ..

:_\ v.:·

' \ :·-.· '.""'.;

··-'' ";i' ..

~,A~p~11dl~,~~c~; , , .- ·-·. __ :_ G'f?qlo'gi_c:·. 4-o_g~ ::· .:-~ .

• j 1 c -, -~ •• : r -~· ) -

'-~·::.. . ' ' .j. - -~ •• ' .'' ·' ¥

.J,_. ,.,I'

;_.. -.. ·~-~ :-~ . -~. ~ "

r.-' - - . '·'- -~"' 1

:) •,1 ,·:·:..: _ ... :_.: ... _ •. ;J.' ..

.~ .• ·.t. ' V•

··~ .

'..: ...

'( ··; . ~ ..

,1

. ~.: .. •. ·-;.,'

''·' ;:_ ·::: •. ,_-_1'\"-_,,._;,:. '-:: _; ,_1,_ ••

'.··

•. _'_''."_', r ''·<~"~ __ , .. _';.· •• .. ·' !. • ~.

'''· ·,

'; ~ ' ., .""; ,-., ' .... : .\ i,

'..\ ·: ·>• .'

. ,

' . -~ -.\ _'

_;.<::J· ·, ''

' ........ ~ ~' ''\•r ',..._•'

. \·, "\. ...

·, '··

. •"-7"

.·. , .

. ,... '<_

.. -" t'''

~ •' ~,.l ..

. ~. .. .. ~ · ... --, /_

J ·~ ..·-'4 ) e

- - . ~ ., '

··, J .... (L

-•:=-- ~" 7 •• - ' .·

'·' .. :. . ·-'-~ h .

-::-'

·1

:·,~!_.:; I

.-l. J

i

' 1

-'I '"" • ., f.

' .. ,. _,: ~· :. '; ' .. ~ ... ',' ·.: :J· l.f"l

·,,.(:"·1'• .'· l

•'J • e '.,;.• '

:·'

\< '~ • )

',,...· .... _: • j

:. : '· .

BORING NO. CMW-1 PAGE 1 OF 2

PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: H O U O W AUGER

START DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 28.1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

- 0 -SAMPLE

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 •

SAMPLE NO,

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

LAB ANAL.

H

H

H

H

H

H

ORG. vAPon (PPM)

0

1-5

0.5

%Rec,

100

100

63

100

100

73

17

73

100

100

100

LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DATA

SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, darkly stained above 1 foot in depth

SANDY SILT, light green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, sandy laminations

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, some clay

SAND, light orange-gray, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, some silt, trace clay

SANDY SILT, gray to tan, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

SILTY SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense to very dense, very fine to fine-grained

SAND, light gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace silt

SAND, tight gray, wet, dense, fine to very coarse-grained

i

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

i i i i i I

DEPTH

- 3 5 -3AM PLE

SAMPLE NO.

LAB ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR

% R E C , LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

SAND, light gray, wet, dense, fine to very coarse-grained

WELL DATA

40 —

(PPMJ

1 100

SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, some very fine-grained sand and clay

008 H 100

100 SILTY SAND, orange-brown-gray, moist, very dense, very fine-grained, trace clay

009 H 100 45

SANDY SILT, olive-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER

START DATE: MARCH 2, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: MARCH 3, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO, LAB ANAL.

ORG, VAPOR

%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN.

GRAPH, ICLOG

WELL DATA

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30

001

002

003

004

005

006

- 3 5 ' 007

H

H

H

H

H

(PPM)

5 17

3.4

0.2

83

100

87

73

63

100

100

73

74

87

86

53

74

87

SILTY SAND, brown-gray, dry, very dense, fine-grained, some clay, blotchy color (fill)

SM

SILTY SAND, dark blue-gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, trace clay, porous, some rootlets

SM

24

SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, laminated

ML

SILTY SAND, olive-brown, moist to wet, fine to medium-grained, trace clay, laminated

from 10 lo 10.5 feet, interlaminated silt and silty sand, below 10.8 feet, orange-brown

SM

10

SANDY SILT, gray, moist, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay

from 15.7 to 16.2 feet, silty sand

ML 50

SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very tine to medium-grained

SM

SP

SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt and clay

at 24 feet, silty and cemented

32

SANDY SILT, olive-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, cemented

ML

SILT, gray, dry, hard, some clay, cemented ML

30 SILTY SAND, light gray, dry, very dense, very , fine-grained, some clay y/^

SM ML

CLAYEY SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, porous

SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay ML 18

I I. :•: • 41 41 4 f 4

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



I i i

i

I 1

I

t 1

I i 1 f

I 1

i i

I i I

DEPTH

-35-3AMPLE

SAMPLE NO.

LAB ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR % REC.

LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN.

GRAPH IC LOG

WELL DATA

26

40 —

SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay

008 H 100

SILTY SAND, green-gray, moist, very dense, very fine-grained, some clay, laminated, becomes less silty with depth

65 SILTY SAND, orange-brown to brown, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained

009 H 80

SAND, light brown to tan, moist, dense, very fine-grained, yellow stains

45

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START DATE: FEBRUARY 26. 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 27,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

i DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 -

SAMPLE NO.

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

U B ANAL.

H

H

H

H

H

ORG, VAPOR (PPM)

19

10

% REC

40

16

67

87

86

100

86

70

25

53

91

87

43

80

LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND MIX, gray and brown moist, stiff/dense, fine-grained, trace alluminum, glass and rubber (fill)

SILT, light gray, moist, very stiff, porous

SILTY SAND, blue-gray, moist, very dense, very fine^ to fine-grained, slightly cemented SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard, porous, cemented, some very fine-grained sand

SAND, dark gray, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt CLAYEY SILT, olive-brown, moist, hard, horizontal caliche veinlets, porous

below 14 feet, gray •

from 16 to 17 feet, sandy

SILTY SAND, gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some clay SAND, tan, dry, dense, very line to coarse-grained

SANDY SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, laminated SILTY SAND, red-brown, moist, very dense, very [ine to medium-grained, some clay

SANDY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay, some orange staining

below 34 feet, wet

uses

M l ^ SM

ML

SM ML

SP

ML

SM

ML SM

ML

26

55

16

46

23

WELL DATA

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



i i t t i i i

f 1

I >

i i

I I

DEPTH

H 3 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE LAB

ANAL. ORG, VAPOR

V. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN,

GRAPHIC LOG

WELL DATA

49

40 —

SANDY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay, some orange staining

ML

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine tc fine-grained, some clay

SM

008 H 67

57 SAND, orange-tan. moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace to some silt

SP

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace clay

SM

009 H 47 45

SAND, orange-gray, moist, dense, fine to coarse-grained, trace silt SW

•'•i'-i'-i 4i 4,

50 —

55

60 — I 1

I 65 —

- 7 0 '

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 26,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

- 0 -SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO,

LAB ANAL.

ORG, VAPOR

% R E C , LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN,

GRAPH ICLOG

WELL DATA

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

001

002

003

004

005

006

- 3 5 -

H

H

H

H

H

^ I 007 I H

92 ASPHALT AND SANDY CLAY, dark brown and black, moist, hard, fine to coarse-grained

CL

73 50

SILTY SAND, brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained

SM ML

73 SILT, light brown-gray, moist, stjif, trace very fine-grained sand, slightly cemented

100 LAMINATED SILT AND SILTY SAND, gray and brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained ML

60 SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained SILTY SAND, mottled gray and orange-brown, moistr dense, fine-grained, trace clay

SP SM

SAND, light orange-gray, dry, fine to medium-grained, tracg silt

SP

SILTY SAND, orange-gray, moist to wet, very dense, very fine to medium-grained

SM

100 88

SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, fine caliche veinlets, some clay ML 100 SILTY SAND, brown, moist to wet, dense, very fine-grained

SM

SILT, gray, moist, very stiff SILTY SAND, gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine-grained SM

73 SAND, gray to orange-brown, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained

SP

74

SILT, gray, dry, hard, some very fine-grained sand and clay

ML

87 42

71

SAND, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to medium-grained

SP

100 SANDY SILT, brown-gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

34

34

SILT, gray, dry, hard, laminated with fine sand layers ML

J2. SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained

SM 28

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

1 ^ .4i.4



i i i

I

I I

DEPTH

- 3 5 -SAMPLE

40 —

45

SAMPLE NO.

008

009

LAB ANAL

H

H

ORG. VAPOR

%REC.

57

80

34

80

LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWS SIN. WEU DATA

SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained SAND, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained SILT, gray, moist, hard SAND, brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt

SANDY SILT, brown, moist, dense, very fine-grained sand

ML

10

•'•i'-i'-i'-i-'-i' fc S S V V fc •* "fc •* v "fc

I

\ • i K** \^ •

r<fc 'i.- -• V :; fc •» • * 'fc ffc • * •:

. * ^ '

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE •

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILUNG METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER

START DATE: FEBRUARY 10.1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 10,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLrT BARREL WITH 2.5' SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

h-0 -SAMPLE

5 —

10 —

15 —

20

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 '

SAMPLE NO.

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

LAB ANAL.

H

H

H

H

H

H

ORG. VAPOR

%REC.

80

73

100

87

100

93

86

87

100

80

43

56 17

80

LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

CLAYEY SAND, brown, saturated, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, some silt (fill) SILTY SAND, dark green-gray, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay, slightly porous

SANDY SILT, dark green-gray, moist, very stiff to hard, fine-grained sand, some clay SAND, light gray, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt tine-grainea, some sm SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, porous, caliche deposits In pores SILTY SAND, green-gray, nxDist. very dense, very fin to medium-grained CLAYEY SAND, mottled gray and brown, moist, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, slightly cementedj SILTY SAND, olive, moist, dense to very dense, cemented, porous

at 14 feet, minor silt layer, gray SANO, light gray, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace silt SILT, gray, moist, hard, trace fine sand SILTY SAND, olive, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly porous

SANDY SILT, gray and brown, moist, hard, fine-grained sand, slightly porous and cemented

SILTY SAND, olive, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented

below 30 feet, light gray, less silt

SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist to wet, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, llmonite stained pores

U = THIN WALL TUBE

0 = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD



i i i

DEPTH

- 3 5 -S AM PLE

40 —

45

SAMPLE SO.

008

009

ua ANAL.

H

H

ORG. VAPOR

(ppnr KREC.

51

47

34

73

LrrwoLOGC DESCRIPTION

SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist to wet, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, linx^nite stained pores

at 36 feet, minor silty sand lens at 36.5 feet, laminations below 38 feet, saturated at 40.5 feet, saturated sand lens, very fine to fine-grained, some silt, 1 Inch thick

uses

ML

26

22

• 1* *.i '.i V.i

:VVVVV"* f\:\:\:^4i\i

WELL DATA

50

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANrTARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER

START DATE: FEBRUARY 4,1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 4,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WrrH 2.5- SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

- 0 -SAMPLE

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 -

SAMPLE NO.

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

LAB ANAL.

H

H

H

H

H

H

ORG. VAPOR (PPM)

<1

%REC.

100

100

13

87

12

93

51

100

100

100

100

87

57

100

LnVOLOQIC DESCRIPTION WEU DATA

CLAYEY SAND, dark brown, wet, dense, fine-grained, trace silt SILTY SAND, tan, dry to moist, very dense, fine-grained, very porous CLAYEY SAND, rnottled dark gray and brown, moist, dense, fine-grained, very porous, some silt SILT, light blue-green gray with some orange mottling, moist, very stiff to hard SAND, light gray, moist, loose, very fine to 7 coarse-grained, some minor silt layers less than 2 Inches thick

SILTY SAND, light brown, moist, very dense, fine-grained, some clay

CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt SANDY SILT, brown, moist to wet, stiff, some clay, very fine to medium-grained sand

SAND, nwttled brown and gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt SILTY SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt ^ / SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

SILTY SAND, mottled orange-brown and light gray, moist, dense, fine-grained

SANDY SILT, orange-gray, moist, stiff, fine-grained sand, trace clay, slightly porous SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, veiy fine to fine-grained

SANDY SILT, gray, moist to wet, medium stiff, very \ fine-grained sand

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANrTARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

- 3 5 -SAMPLE

SAMPLE LAB ANAL

ORG. VAPOR

%REC. LrrHOLOGC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS GRAPH-eiN. CLOQ

WEU DATA

40

54 SANDY SILT. gray, moist to wet. medium stiff, very fine-grained sand ^ SM

008 H 73

100

SILTY SAND, light gray, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace llmonite and cart>on specks

below 40 feel, brown

at 42 feet, silt layer 5 Inches thick at 43 feel, laminations

28

008 H 73 SILT, gray, moist, hard, trace sand ML

45 50

; V V V V V k •* V *. s . * k *fc

. •* *. *. k * . *fc 4ft

. S V •* ^ ^ * V y V V t'

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START DATE: FEBRUARY 5,1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 7,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLH" BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER

DEPTH

1—0 -SAMPLE

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 -

SAMPLE NO.

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

LAB ANAL

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

ORG. VAPOR (PPM)

%REC.

71

80

43

93

100

87

51

100

86

87

100

73

57

100

LITHOLOGC DESCRIPTION W a i DATA

CLAYEY SAND,dark brown, wet, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some silt SILTY SAND, brown-gray, wet, dense, very fine lo y coarse-grained, trace clay X CLAYEY SAND, dark gray, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some sill, porous

SAND, light gray, moist, medium dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded

SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard SILTY SAND, mottled orange-brown-gray, moist, very dense, fine to medium-grained CLAYEY SAND, mottled brown and gray, moist. veryS dense, very fine to fine-grained SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard, porous

SILTY SAND, brown, moist, very dense, fine to medium-grained SAND, light gray, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medlum-q rained SAND, gray, nDolst, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace silt, some sill and silly sand seams CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt SILT, mottled orange and gray, moist, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SILTY SAND, light orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine to f Ine-qralned SANDY CLAY, brown, moist to wet, very stiff, fine-qralned sand, some silt SILTY SAND, light orange-brown, moist, very dense very fine to fine-grained SANDY SILT, mottled orange-gray, moist, hard, f Ine-qralned sand SAND, gray-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, poorly graded

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANfFARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

\-35-SAMPLE

40 —

45

SAMPLE NO.

008

009

LAB ANAL.

H

H

ORG. VAPOR WW

%REC.

36

73

29

67

LnWOLOGC OeSCHIPTION

SAND, gray-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, poorly graded

below 40 feet, very fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded

uses

SP

SW

BLOWS BIN.

18

15

GRAPH-CLOQ

iti'.tr.ti

WEU DATA

' t' V t ' V y

<^ 4.{ :i *i 4i

>'t It U ' t

50

55

60 —

f \

i i I I

65

- 7 0 '

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R«= ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME:Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger

START DATE: November 18,1992 COMPLETION DATE: November 19,1992 ELEVATION: 270 Feet +1- 2 Feet SAMPLER TYPE: 3-Inch Diameter Split Barrel

DEPTH

1—0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO, U B ANAL.

ORa VAPOR

%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained

uses GRAPH-CLOG

WELL DATA

(PPM)

10 —

15 —

20

25 001 N 0.0 70

30

- 3 5 '

SM

SILT, gray, dry, hard, some clay ML

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained >

SM ML

SILT, light blue-gray, dry, hard below 8 feel, gray-brown

SANDY SILT, brown-gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand

ML

SILTY SANO, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some sand lenses

CLAYEY SILT, gray-brown lo gray below 28 feet, moist, very stiff, some cemented zones below 28.5 feet

ML

SANDY SILT, olive-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, easy drilling

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece

DEPTH

- 3 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. ua ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS

SIN. GRAPH ICLOG

WELL DATA

40 t 002 N 0.0 70

45 003 N 0.0 50

50

55 —

60 —

65

SANDY SILT, olive-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, easy drilling

ML SM

SILTY SAND, olive-brown and brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some limonite stained and cemented zones

CLAYEY SILT, mottled orange-brown and gray, moist, very stiff, trace to some very fine-grained sand

ML

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, cemented, abundant limonite deposits

SM

\1,\'\t'4t\'v ;.'::y.«;7«;.' fL.

SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some silly sand layers, poorly graded

SP

•fc«V*V'>' <fc.*fc*v*V*

•fc.«fc.«fc."fc.

*fc.*fc.*fc.'fc.

- 7 0

Boring terminated at 65 feet. No free ground water encountered. See Well Data for details on backfilling.

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger

START DATE: November 20,1992 COMPLETION DATE: November 20,1992 ELEVATION: 270 Feet -f/- 2 Feet SAMPLER TYPE: 3-Inch Diameter Split Barrel

DEPTH


NO. U B ANAL,

ORG. VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH' ICLOG WELL DATA

(PPM)

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25

SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, abundant silt, some clay

below 4 feel, gray-brown, less sill and clay

SM

belwo 12 feel, gray

SILT, gray, moist, stiff, some clay, trace very fine-grained sand

ML

SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some sill

SP

SILT, gray, moist, hard ML

SANDY SILT, orange-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

001 N 0.0 SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay

SM

30 SILT, gray, moist, very stiff lo hard, some cemented zones and caliche vienlets

ML

- 3 5 -

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece

DEPTH

- 3 5 -SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO.

U B ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS SIN.

GRAPHIC LOQ

WELL DATA

SILT, gray, moist, very stiff lo hard, some cemented zones and caliche veinlets

ML

SILTY SAND, olive-brown and brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace limonite stained and cemented zones

SM

40 002 N 0.0

45 003 N 0.0 10

SAND, light orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt, poorly graded

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, cemented

SP

SM

^ ^ ^ ^ ;.<;.y.<.-.y;<

50

SANDY SILT, mottled olive-gray and orange-brown, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay

ML

55 —

60 —

65

.................... k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4:.4:.4;,4:.4:.4;,4:.

Boring terminated at 65 feet. No free ground water encountered. See Well Data for details on backfilling.

- 7 0

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 1 OF 8

PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH

START DATE: JANUARY 17,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 21,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

3L0WS SIN. DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE mm

NO. ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR

% REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 -

CLAYEY SAND, dark brown, moist to wet, dense, very fine lo fine-grained

below 5 feet, mottled gray and brown

at 8 feet, hard drilling CLAYEY SILT, light gray, dry, hard, cemented

SM SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, slightly cemented ML

SILTY SAND, brown, medium dense lo dense, very Jjnejp ri]sdiiifp-grainesi ^ SAND, orange-brown, medium dense to dense, fine lo coarse-grained, trace very fine-grained sand and silt, well-graded

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, moderately cemented, some white caliche

from 32 to 34 feet, hard drilling, very cemented

SILTY CLAY, orange-tan, medium stiff, some very fine-grained sand CL

U = THIN WALL TUB^

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

H 3 5 -SAMPLE

NO. ANAL VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. WELL DATA

40 —

45 —

50 —

55 —

•60 —

65 —

- 7 0 '

SILTY CLAY, orange-tan, medium stiff, some very fine-grained sand

CL

CLAYEY SAND, red-orange-brown, medium dense, very fine-grained, some sill and medium-grained biotite flakes

SC

SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

SANDY CLAY, orange-brown, stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand

below 53 feel, orange-tan

CL

at 58 feet, minor silty sand lens, fine to medium-grained

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, slightly cemented ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD i



DEPTH

- 7 0 -SAMPLE

>J0. ANAL VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses

GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

75 —

80

85 001 50

90

95 001 60

100-

-105-

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, slightly cemented ML

SILTY CLAY, tan, very stiff, some very fine to medium-grained sand

CL

SAND, light gray, dense, medium lo coarse-grained, _some sijtjand_cla^ ^ SILTY CLAY, tan-gray, very stiff, some very fine to fine-grained sand

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace very coarse-grained sand and clay, saturated with clear water

SAND, orange-brown, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded

SM

SW

contact sharp and, irregular

'...'.*.*.*.

'...'..."...

£L;ÊYJiiigraii. vary §iiif . SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to fine-grained

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



i

DEPTH

-105-SAMPLE

110—

115—

120 —

125 —

130—

135 —

-140-

NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained ^

, 3 M ^ ' T M l J

CLAYEY SILT,gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SAND, gray, very dense, nnedium lo very coarse-grained, trace to some fine gravel

GRAVELLY SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained sand, fine gravel

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard

SAND, orange-brown, very dense, fine to £oarse-gralned, well-graded / CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, limonite coated veinlets

uses

SW

SW

ML

SW " M L "

SIN. ICLOG

HBHBHBI

WELL DATA

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

- M O -SAMPLE pimp

NO. ANAL. VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 3L0WS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

145—

150-

155 —

160 —

165—

170 —

-175-

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, limonite coated elQlfils . _

SANDY CLAY, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt

CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained

£LAi:EY.,5iLL gcay. liard CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine to fine-grained

CLAYEY SILT, green-gray, hard

al 156 feet, fine-grained sandy layer

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

M 7 5 -SAMPLE

NO, ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

'_CLAYEYSIIJ,greenng^ra^hard _ _ _ SANDY CLAY, gray-Ian, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some sill

uses SIN. ICLOQ WELL DATA

180—

185-

190-

195 —

200—

205-

-210-

002

ML CL

SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo coarse-grained, trace silt, poorly graded

SP

100

ÂNpYÎLTjanJiard, fine-grained.sajid _ _ _ SILTY SANO, tan, very dense, very fine to ^ jpediymj^raingd SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained,

_£00_r!y graded_ ^ SANDY CLAY AND SANDY SILT, light gray, hard, very fine lo fine-grained sand

ML SMy SP

~CL

CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine-grained sand

ML

below 203 feet, very stiff, some orange-brown

SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained7\ micaceous, poorly graded

i i

i

I

t U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

I I BORING NO. CDM-1


PAGE 7 OF 8

SIN, ICLOG DEPTH

- 2 1 0 -SAMPLE

NO. T3tB-ANAL. ens-

VAPOR

%flEC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

215—

220—

225 —

230 —

235—

240 —

-245-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SAND, gray, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, micaceous, Eoorl^jjo well-graded y SANDY CLAY, gray and orange-tan, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt

SW_ ~ C L "

SANDY SILT, orange to peach, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, minor cemented layer

ML

CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff

SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, iliicateoiis _ ^ CLAYEY SILT, orange-gray, stiff to ve^ stiff

below 227 feel, hard

ML

"ML

SANDY SILT, orange-gray, very stiff, very fine lo medium-grained sand, some clay, minor thin silly sand lenses

ML

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

I



DEPTH

1-245-SAMPLE

NO, ANAL. VAPOR %REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

3 C ML

uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA

250-

SANDY SILT, orange-gray, very stiff, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor thin silly sand^ lenses / SILT, gray, hard, some clay, moderately cemented

below 247 feet, very stiff

255—

260 —

265 —

270-

275 —

-280-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

t I


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH

START DATE: June 24,1992 COMPLETION DATE: June 25. 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR NREC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses

GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 -

CLAYEY SILT, gray-brown, dry lo moist below 2 feet, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

at 3 feel, red-brown

below 5 feet, light gray, dry

ML

at 8 feel, calcified, hard drilling below 9 feet, moist

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, cemented

SM

CLAYEY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, some white caliche

ML

SAND, orange-brown, medium-dense, fine to coarse-grained, moderately graded

SW

SILTY SAND, gray, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some minor clayey sill lenses

SM

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, calcified, some minor sandy silt lenses

SANDY SILT, brown-gray, stiff lo very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

1-35-SAMPLE

ANAL VAPOR % REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. 10 LOG WELL DATA

40 —

45 —

50

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0 '

SANDY SILT, brown-gray, stiff to very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay

SM

SANDY SILT, light orange-brown, medium stiff to stiff, very fine-grained sand, sorneclay_

CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff, some stained micropores

CLAYEY SAND, light orange-red-tan, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill

ML

M"L

SC

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff

SAND, orange-brown to gray-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded

ML

SW

SILTY CLAY, gray to light gray, very stiff C L

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD i



SIN, mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

- 7 0 -SAMPLE

NO, ANAL. VAPOR •JiREC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

75-

80 —

85 —

90 —

95 —

100 —

-105-

SILTY CLAY, gray lo light gray, very stiff C L

SANDY SILT, gray, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some silt, pooriy graded

al 79 feet, cemented silt lens

t)elow 82 feet, some coarse-grained sand

SP

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, someclay_ /

SILTY SAND, orange and red-brown, stiff, very fine to fine-grained, red-brown material is well cemented

ML SM~

SILT, gray, hanJ, some clay, cemented

below 97 feel, light gray, stiff, uncemenled

ML

SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained

below 105 feel, light brown-gray

SM

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? SIN.

mm ICLOG

DEPTH

1-105-SAMPLE mm

NO, ANAL. •msr

VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

110—

115—

120 —

125 —

130-

135-

-140-

001 0.0

SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained

below 108 feel, hard drilling, dari red-brown, cemented, trace pea gravel

SM

bielow 116 feel, gray, dense, easier drilling

SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo coarse-grained, some sill

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff lo hard, very fine lo medium-grained, some sand lenses

SW

M"L

SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine sand ML

SILTY SAND, gray, dense, very fine-grained SM

40 SANO, gray, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some -Sill . y

2E. ML

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SANDY SILT, brown-gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, cemented

X

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH

-140-SAMPLE SAMPLE

*J0. LAB ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR


145—

150—

155 —

160 —

165—

170 —

-175-

SANDY SILT, brown-gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, cemented /

at_14_1_feeti sand lens

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff

SANDY CLAY, light brown, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some sill

C L

SILTY SAND, dari< orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo tine-grained, trace clay, cemented

SM

SANDY CLAY, lingl orange-brown, stiff, very fine to fine-grained, some sill

b>elow 158 feel, light gray

C L

SILTY CLAY, light gray lo gray, stiff

above 163 feet, some very fine-grained sand

C L

below 168 feel, gray,'hard

below 175 feel, light gray, stiff

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



GRAPH, ICLOG

DEPTH

- ^ 7 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. u 5 -ANAL. VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 3L0WS SIN.

WEU DATA

180-

185—

190 —

195 —

200—

205 —

-210-

SILTYCLAY, light gray, stiff

below 177 feel, some very fine-grained sand

C L

SANDY SILT, gray and gray-brown, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, trace orange color

ML

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

ML

below 190 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand, salmon colored, well-rounded, pryoclastic composition below 191 feet, gray, hard t>elow 193 feel, light gray, stiff

below 196 feet, gray, hard

SILT, salmon-pink, very stiff, cemented, pyroclastic composition

ML

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, cemented

al 205 feet, hard drilling

ML

SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay

SM

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-2 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 7 OF 8

TO? SIN.

mm ICLOG

DEPTH

- 2 1 0 -SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR ^^REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

215—

220-

225-

230 —

235—

240-

-245-

1 '

002 0.0 50

SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to fine^grainedjjsome cjay SANDY SILT, orange-gray, hard, slightly cemented

SM ML

SAND, orange-gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, abundant mica flakes

SW

SANDY SILT, gray, hard, fine-grained ML

SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained

SM

SAND, gray, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, some minor silty sand lenses

SANDY CLAY, brown with dari< gray laminations, stiff, very fine to fine-grained

SW

C L

CLAYEY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill

SC

SANDY SILT, light gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, very stiff

al 245 feel. dari< brown-black lens, organic rich

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

0 = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-2 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 8 OF 8

DEPTH

F-245-SAMPLE mm

NO. ANAL.

BBS-VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOG

W a L DATA

250-

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, very stiff

t>elow 246 feel, trace fine-grained sand

SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, slightly cemented

255—

260 —

265 —

270—

275 —

-280-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START DATE: June 29,1992 COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE mpiTi

NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses

SLOWS SIN.

GRAPH. ICLOG

WELL DATA

5 —

I O

I S —

20 —

25 —

30

- 3 5 '

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SANDY SILT, brown, dry to moist below 1 fool, very stiff, fine to medium-grained sand ^

ML

ML CLAYEY SILT, blue-gray, dry lo moist, hard, cemented

SILTY SAND, light gray, moist lo wet, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some clay

below 8 feet, brown, fine-grained

SM

SAND, gray-brown, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, some minor silty sand laminations, orange-brown

SP

SILT, tan, medium stiff to hard, some cemented zones, some clay

ML

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? SIN.

ICLOG DEPTH

1—35-SAMPLE mtm

NO. ANAL.

CHS" VAPOR


40 —

45 —

50

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0

SILT, tan, medium stiff lo hard, some cemented zones, some clay

M L

SAND, dari< gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some silt and clay, abundant mica flakes, pooriy graded

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some clayey sill lenses

SP

SM

SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to coarse-grained, some sill

SP

SILT, gray and brown, hard, very cemented, some fine-grained sand

SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some sill and silly sand lenses

ML

SW

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

- 7 0 -SAMPLE ssnPTp

NO. ANAL. VAPOR

14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN,

GRAPHIC LOQ

WELL DATA

001 0.0 40

75-

1'

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand y

SAND, gray lo light gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, trace pebbles, some silt and clay, poorly graded

_ML SP

B O

S S -

90 —

95 —

100 —

below 75 feel, well-graded SW

SANDY SILT, red-orange-brown, hard, very fine-grained sand, sonne clay

ML

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, slightly cemented ML

-105-

1 ' at 105 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-3 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 4 OF 8

I I «

mm NO,

T3B-ANAL.

ORG. VAPOR

DEPTH

H05-SAMPLE %REe, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses

TO? SIN. mm-

ICLOG

WELL DATA

l i o

n s -

120 —

125 —

130—

135-

-140-

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, slightly cemented

SANDY SILT, red-orange-brown, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, cemented

ML

M"L

SILTY CLAY, light brown-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand and pebbles

C L

at 117 feet, minor silty sand lens, orange-brown

at 121 feet, minor sand lens

from 134 to 135 feel, well-cemented

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

3L0WS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH

-140-SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. u ? -ANAL.

mr VAPOR


145-

150-

155 —

160 —

165—

170 —

-175-

002 0.0 30

SILTY C U Y , light brown-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand and pebbles

SW SAND, gray, very dense, tine lo very coarse-grained SANDY SILT, gray, hard, fine lo coarse-grained sand, some clay

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some clay

CLAYEY SILT, light brown-gray, hard

CLAYEY SAND, gray-brown, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill

SAND, orange-brown, very dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, poorly graded

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine lo medium-grained sand

SAND, orange-gray, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some sill

below 170 feel, some very coarse-grained sand, while and pink

SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SM_ " M L

SC

SP

ML

SW

C L

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



SLOWS SIN,

GRAPH, ICLOG

DEPTH

M75-SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. ua ANAL VAPOR

S P E C . LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

ISO-

I B S -

190 —

195-

200—

205 —

-210-

SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SANO, light gray and while, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, grains are well rounded and have pyroclastic composition

SANDY C U Y , orange-gray, very stiff, very fine to fine sand, some sill and minor sand lenses


at 195 feet, some light violet color

at 205 feet, some dry, hard, cemented zones

C L

SW

C L

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOG

DEPTH

h-210-SAMPLE

NO. ANAL 7m~ VAPOR

%REe, LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

215—

220—

225 —

230 —

235—

240 —

-245-


ML

SILTY CLAY, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine gravel, trace salmon color

C L

SAND, salmon, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some fine lo coarse gravel, well-rounded, pooriy graded

GRAVELLY SANO, black and white, medium lo very coarse-grained, subangularto subrounded, fine gravel, well-graded

SP

SW

CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace fine sand, moderately cemented

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



1 1 i

POT? 6 IN.

GRAPH, ICLOG DEPTH

h245-SAMPLE mtm

NO.

T3B-ANAL. VAPOR

%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA


250-

255—

260 —

265-

270—

275 —

-280-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH

START OATE: JANUARY 27,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

TO? 6 IN. mm:

ICLOG

DEPTH

— 0 -SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL. mr-

VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25

30 —

- 3 5 -

CLAYEY SAND, dari< brown, wet, medium stiff, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill

SC

SILTY SAND, light gray-brown, moist, medium dense, very fine to fine-grained

SM

SANDY SILT, gray, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

some minor silty sand lenses and slightly cemented zones

ML

SILTY SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, slightly cemented

SM

SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, medium stiff, very fine^ i s flQS-gialnQsLs^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CLAYEYSILT,gray, st[tf ^ ^ SANDY C U Y , orange-tan, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some silt

SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained

CL "ML"

CL

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

f - 3 S -SAMPLE mm

NO. ANAL. VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded

uses LOWS

GIN. GRAPH, ICLOG WELL DATA

40 —

45 —

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

SW

al 45 feel, minor clayey silt lens, gray, very stiff ,.'.».'...'.'

SANDY SILT, orange-brown, very stiff, very fine lo Jine;^rained_sand^some clay

SILTY C U Y , light orange-brown, stiff, some very _fine^rained_sand_

SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up to 3/16 inch in dinnension

ML CL

SW

- 7 0

.*,..*,..*.

.*...*.*.*.•

.*,*.'...**

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

H 7 0 -SAMPLE

NO TO-ANAL.

CH5— VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

001 0.0 75

75 —

80 —

85 —

90 —

95 —

100-

SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up lo 3/16 inch in dinnension, well-graded

below 74 feet, coarse-grained, pebbles are subrounded

SW .'.*.'...*.•

,iy<,yiy

:i.y<,yi.v ,iyi.yiy'

:iy<,y<.v

GRAVELLY SAND, gray, dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, fine gravel up to 3/8 inch in dimension

SANDY C U Y , light brown, stiff, very fine lo Jinej^rained san(i_some sjtt_ SILT, light gray, hard, cemented

from 91 to 95 feet, hard drilling, drill rods chatter

CL

ML

CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff ML

-105-

at 103 feet, orange colored layer

below 105 feet, some fine-grained sand

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



I

I I

DEPTH

-105-SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR % REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA

n o

u s -

120 —

125 —

130—

135 —

CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, some fine-grained sand, cemented

ML

SANO, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

iyi,'*,*i"v*«

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, some cemented zones

SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some sill, well-graded

ML

SW k^V'<,yi

*,..*..*..

SILT, gray, very stiff ML

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine to medium-grained sand

ML

-140-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? 6 IN.

mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

—140-SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL. Bna—

VAPOR


002 40 CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine to jriedium^rained sand_ / SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace sill

_ML sw'

145-

150—

155 —

160 —

165—

170 —

SANDY SILT, orange-brown, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, minor clayey sand lenses, slightly cemented

ML

SILT, gray, hard, some clay, slightly cemented ML

from 162 lo 163 feet, hard drilling

SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor silty sand lenses

ML

-175-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

M 7 5 -SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. IC LOO WELL DATA

ISO-

185—

190 —

195-

200—

205-

-210-

003

SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor silty sand lenses

ML

CLAYEY SANO, light gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill

SC

SANO, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, some silt

sw

SILTY C U Y , light purple-gray, very stiff to hard CL

from 193 lo 194 feel, hard drilling

SANDY C U Y , light brown-gray, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some limonite stains

CL

50

SANO, gray-brown, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, well-graded

SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace silt (volcanlclastic sediment)

SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

SP

SW I f J

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

f-210-SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL.

BH5-VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN,

GRAPH, ICLOG

WELL DATA

215—

220—

225 —

230 —

235—

240 —

SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

al 216 feet, white welded tuff layer

SAND, brown-gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace coarse to very coarse-grained sand

SP

al 228 feel, minor sandy clay layer

SILTY C U Y , tan, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand CL

below 236 feet, very stiff to hard

SILT, light gray and gray, very stiff, some cemented zones, some thin sandy silt and sand lenses, very fine lo fine-grained

ML

-245-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

i



GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH

f-245-SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. U S ANAL.

oRS— VAPOR

14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS 6 IN,

WELL DATA

SILT, light gray and gray, very stiff, some cemented zones, some thin sandy sill and sand lenses, very fine lo fine-grained

ML

250-

255—

260 —

265-

270-

275 —

-280-

I I

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START OATE: JANUARY 22,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 23, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

DEPTH

I—0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. OT-ANAL. VAPOR

%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses TO? IN.

mm ICLOG

WELL DATA

5 —

I O

IS—

20 —

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 '

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SILTY SANO, dart< brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained

SM

SILT, light gray, moist, very stiff to hard, some very fine-grained sand and clav, slightiv cemented

ML

SANDY SILT, tan-gray, moist, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay

at 8 feet, cemented layer

ML

SAND, light orange-brown, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace sill and clay, pooriy-graded

SP

at 15 feet, minor silt layer

at 24 feet, some coarse-grained sand, appears poorly-graded, slightly to moderately cemented

SANO. gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel up lo 1/4 Inch In dimension

SW

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

I



mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

h-35-SAMPLE psrm

NO.

TO-ANAL.

OT5— VAPOR

V. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

40 —

45 —

SO —

55 —

60 —

65 —

- 7 0 '

SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel up to 1/4 inch in dimension

SW

CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, medium dense to _dense, wry fine t£_medium^raine(ij50TO ^ SAND, gray-brown, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded

CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown, dense very fine lo _finej^rajnedôrrie sitt_ _ / SAND, orange-gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some slit and clay

CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill

SC

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard ML

SANDY C U Y , orange-brown and gray, very stiff, very fine to medium-grained sand

CL

SANO, gray-brown, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, micaceous, well-graded

SW

i U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-5 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 3 OF 8

DEPTH

- 7 0 -SAMPLE

75

80

85

90 —

95 —

100 —

-105-

mm NO.

1 '

1 '

TO-ANAL.

001

001

PRC-VAPOR

%REC.

50

SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to _med[unvgrajnedj_poqrly graded^ y

SAND, gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace silt and clay

below 78 feel, fine lo coarse-grained

50

LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

3^ SAND, gray-brown, dense, very fine to / f " ^ / coarse-grained, micaceous, well-graded /LSM4 SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine / ^ " to fine-grained, trace clav /

SILTY SAND. dari< orange-brown, very fine lo fine-grained, trace clay

SILT, gray, hard, slightly cemented

_SANp, oranê-bj^wnj/er^finejo coarse-grained^ SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand

from 96 lo 98 feel, orange, hard, cemented

at 102 feel, lost circulation, restored in 2 hours

SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, fine-grained, some sill

uses SLOWS SIN.

SW

SM

ML

SW ML

CL

GRAPH-ICLOQ

: n K R i i R i t

*.*.'.*.'.'

WELL DATA

U = THIN WALL TUBE ,

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

M OS-SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN.

WELL DATA

l i o

n s -

120 —

125 —

130-

135 —

-140-

SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, fine-grained, ônTesitt_ ^ SILTY C U Y , orange-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

CL

'cL

SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand

CL

SILTY CLAY, gray, very stiff CL

!

1 U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? SIN.

mm. ICLOQ

DEPTH

-140-3AMPLE mm

NO,

TO-ANAL.

PR5— VAPOR

14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

145—

150-

155-

160-

165-

170 —

-175-

002 90

SILTY C U Y j r a y . very stiff SAND, gray-brown, dense, coarse to very

_coarse-£rained, goorJ^graded_ / SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, very fine lo

_fine^rajned SAND, gray-brown, dense, coarse to very coarse-grained, poorly graded .

CL

CL

SP~

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiH to hard ML

SANDY C U Y , gray-brown, hard CL

SANO, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt

SP

SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, cemented SAND, gray, dense, fine-grained SILIV SANDjray, very densejine^rajned^ / SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained

1

SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine lo very ôaree-gralned, well-g^^ded SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some sill

SW " C L "

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

M 7 5 -SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LnnOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA

180-

185—

190 —

195 —

200—

205 —

-210- t

SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt

CL

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand

ML

below 185 feet, no sand

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand

at 196 feet, well-cemented layer

CLAYEY SILT, brown, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand

ML

ML

below 201 feel, gray

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

1 U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

1-210-SAMPLE mm

NO.

OT-ANAL. VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

215-

220—

225 —

230-

235-

240 —

-245-

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff lo hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

SILT, flesh to peach, very stiff (voteantelastic ash) ML

CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace to some fine-grained sand

ML

SAND, brown-gray, dense, fine lo very _coarse-c[rained, well-graded

SANDY C U Y , brown, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt

_ /

CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard ML

CLAYEY SAND, brown, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt

SC

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, some well-cemented layers

ML

SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff to hard, some fine-grained sand and sandy sill lenses, some well cemented zones

CL

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

h 5 4 5 -3AMPLE mm

NO,

OT-ANAL.

mr VAPOR

14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOQ

WELL DATA

250-

SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff to hard, some fine-grained sand and sandy sill layers, some well cemented zones

CL

255—

260 —

265 —

270—

275-

-280-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START DATE: JANUARY 15,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 16,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

•mm. ICLOQ

DEPTH

h-0 -SAMPLE mm

NO.

TOT ANAL. VAPOR

14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.

WELL DATA

10 N

15 t N

20

25 —

30 —

- 3 5 '

1 '

30

82

SILTY SAND, brown, moist, medium dense to dense, fine-grained, trace clay

SM

SANDY SILT, mottled light brown and gray, moist, medium stiff, fine-grained sand

ML

SILTY SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace clay

at 11.5 feel, limonite-stained, cemented layer

SM

SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, some clay, abundant caliche veinlets, slightly cemented

ML

SILTY SAND, light brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace clay

SM

SAND, light gray, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, trace pebbles, sill and clay, well-graded

SW

SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, sonie^ clay

fc.*,fc.",fc.\

..*>.*>.*

..*,..*..*.

ML

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

h-35-3AMPLE SAMPLE

NO. ua ANAL

ORG: VAPOR

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. ICLOQ WEa DATA

SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, some _cla)^ ^

SAND, light gray, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace silt, poorly graded

ML

"sp~

40' N 82 al 41 feel, sharp contact

SILTY SAND, brown to orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace clay

SM

45

SO —

55 —

" S A N D , gray, dense, medium lo coarse-grainedr minor clay and silt layers, well-graded

SW

;iy y<," "

SILTY SAND, brown, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay, some sill layers

SM

60 N 50 SANDY SILT, brown, stiff lo very stiff, fine-grained

sand, some clav / y f " SILTY SANO. brown, dense, very fine-grained CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff to very stiff

65

SILTY SANO, gray, dense, very fine-grained, trace clay

- 7 0 '

SAND, gray, dense, fine to coarse-grained, well-graded SW

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



5CBW? SIN. mm.

ICLOG

DEPTH

^ 7 0 -SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL.

PH5— VAPOR

% REC. LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

75 —

SANO, gray, dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

80 001 40

at 80 feet, fine to coarse-grained, abundant coarse-grained mica

85

90 —

95 —

SILTY C U Y , orange-brown-gray, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

CL

CLAYEY SILT, light orange-brown, stiff, trace lo some fine-grained sand

ML

SILTY SANO, gray, medium dense to dense, very fine to fine-grained, some dari< gray bands, 1/4 lo 1/2 inch thk;k

SM

100-

Hos-

N 70 C U Y E Y SILT, gray to light gray, stiff, some very fine-grained sand, some slightly cemented layers ML SILTY SAND, grav. dense, vary fine-grained SM SAND, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill

SP

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? 6 IN.

mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

-1 OS-SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL. m"

VAPOR


l i o

n s -

120-N 100

125-

130—

135-1 '

002 <1 80

-140-

SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some sill

_SP_

svT" SANO, gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, trace orange-brown silt lenses, trace pet>bles, well-graded

i,'4Vi,v>,<

SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff, slightly to moderately cemented

CL

SANO, brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded, minor cemented sill lenses

SW.

SILTY SAND, gray, dense lo very dense, very fine-grained, trace coarse-grained sand, trace to some clay and sill lenses

SM

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, cemented

ML

SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, _welt;graded_ _ _ _ SILTY SANO, gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

SM

SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace sill and clay, poorly-graded

SP

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



TO? SIN.

mm: ICLOG

DEPTH

-140-SAMPLE

NO. TO-ANAL,

PRS— VAPOR

y. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

145—

150—

155 —

160 —

165—

170 —

-175-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace silt and clay, poorly-graded SAND, brown, dense, fine to coarse-grained, well-graded

SILTY SANO, brown, dense lo very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented

SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

SILTY CLAY, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

at 155 feet, calcified silt

SANO, light brown, dense, fine lo coarse-grained

SANDY C U Y , brown-gray, stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt

SP

SW

SM

ML

CL

SW

CL

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

-175-3AMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL.

PRS— VAPOR

%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

_CL ^ uses WELL DATA

ISO—

185—

190 —

195 —

200—

205 —

-210-

1 '

SANDY C U Y , brown-gray, stiff, very fine to ^ _fine^rainedsan_d^somesijl ^

SAND, light gray, dense, coarse-grained, abundant ' .mica _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / CLAYEY SILT, light brown-gray and purple-gray, very stiff, trace very-fine to coarse-grained sand, some slightly lo moderately cemented layers

SILTY C U Y , purple-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand, some cemented layers

below 195 feet, olive-gray

al 205 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand

SAND, light gray, dense, coarse-grained, abundant \ mfca_ SANDY C U Y , light gray, very stiff, very fine to ~~ fine-grained

CL

i i i

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



BRS— VAPOR

TO? SIN,

GRAPH-ICLOG

DEPTH

-210-SAMPLE mm

NO.

TO-ANAL.


215-

220—

225 —

230 —

235—

240 —

-245-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

SANDY C U Y , light gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained

CL

SANO, brown-gray, dense, fine lo very j:oai]5e^rained,_abundanj_mica "slLTY SAND, dari< gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, well-cemented

_5W_ _ • ^ M ~

SILTY C U Y , tan. very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand, minor silty sand lenses

CL

CLAYEY SILT AND SANDY SILT, brown-gray and purple-gray, very stiff, trace to some very fine-grained sand

ML

SAND, brown-gray, medium dense lo dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded

SW

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



I

I I i i i DEPTH

1-245-SAMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR 14 REC. LriHOLOQIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. ICLOQ WELL DATA

SANO, brown-gray, medium dense lo dense, fine lo _coarse^rainedjA'ell;5raded_ ^ SILTY C U Y , Ian, ve^ stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

SW " C L "

250-

255-

260 —

265 —

270—

275 —

T^80-

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



START OATE: JANUARY 29.1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 3,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES

ORG. VAPOR

PLOWS SIN,

SRSPff] ICLOQ

DEPTH


NO, U B ANAL.


5 —

I O

I S -

20 —

25 —

30 —

SILTY SANO, gray, moist, hard, very fine lo medium-grained

below 5 feet, dry

SM

SANDY SILT, gray, moist, hard, very tine to fine-grained sand

ML

SAND, light brown to tan, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace silt, well-graded

SW

- 3 5 -

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

;iy<,y<' ' :i>i'AV

i y yiV rtiyiV :i,yi,yi,' " :<,y<,y<v t y y y >y<,y<.v i:<,y<.y<,v wy ' ' syiy^y Ay y y liy y y :i.yiy<y y y v

;iy<.y<y xyiy iV i y y y :i y<: ' VAyi,v :iy*y*«' >y<,y<,y liyiy^y > y<y y y v

:iy<yiV y y v

•ViViV

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD


PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

DEPTH

H 3 5 -SAMPLE mm

NO,

TO-ANAL.

PRS— VAPOR

%REe. LHWOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG

WELL DATA

40 —

45 —

50 —

55

60 —

65

SANO, light brown to tan, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace silt, well-graded

t>elow 40 feel, fine to very coarse-grained, sonie fjne gravel_

SW

SILTY C U Y , orange-tan, stiff, trace lo some fine-grained sand

below 46 feel, slightly cemented

CL

SILTY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace clay, slightly cemented

SM

SANDY CLAY, light orange-gray, medium stiff to stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some silt, minor silty sand and pebble lenses

CL

SAND, light brown to Ian, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace sill

SW

•70'

4y<,yiy ^yiy^y iy^y^y

,.*,..*..*. E yy-iy y yA"

. . * fc>* fc>* fc

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-7 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 3 OF 8

PRS— VAPOR

SLOWS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOG

DEPTH

- 7 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. ua ANAL

%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

SAND, light brown lo tan, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace sill

SW

75-001 0.0 50 at 76 feel, sharp color change to

orange-brown

80

85 —

90 —

95

100 —

SANDY C U Y , orange-gray, stiff, very fine lo jpedium^rained sand^_some s]lt_ SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace clay, slightly cemented

CL

SM

CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown and orange-gray, _dense, veryjine to fine;grained^ minor sand_j clay_^ SANO, orange-gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained

below 100 feel, some fine gravel up to 3/8 inch in dimension, minor sandy clay lenses

SC_ SW~

Ay y ^ k . ' . » .

k . * . . . .' .' ^ k . * . .

. .' .' ^ >y<.yi' liy^yi' ^y^yi' ^^^yi' y y '*

^y^yi*

^y^yi"* i yiy ^ i y y ^ :iy<.yi'*

Ay^y ' :<.y yi' t^yiyi'

y yi'« :iyiyi'« ^ >y '

-105-

^yiy^v i yiyi* k.* * . \ f c , "

k . " fc.'.fc.*.

• . ' f c .

h .

k . * » . • > . ' . »•*>«•>.• fc.**.•>.*.

. .' .' ^ fc.* fc.'.fc.*

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD

BORING NO. CDM-7 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE

PAGE 4 OF 8

P3W? SIN. mm

ICLOG

DEPTH

H OS-SAMPLE mm

NO,

TO-ANAL.

PRS— VAPOR


110—

115-

120 —

125 —

SANO, orange-gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up to 3/8 Inch in dimension, minor sandy clay lenses

SW Ay^y^y :iyi,y4y ;i,y'iy<.'' ' iy^y^v ;i,yi,yi"''' :<,yi.yi*' :'yy•v ^y^yi ' :iy<,y4y i y' yiy :<,y<,y<,y i y y y i y y y y y y

;iy<,ysV ^'Ay-iy >yy<,y ;iy<,yi''" nv y v ; ,y y ,v yiy y y y v ,.*..*..',.

v'iy^y :iy<,yi ' :<,yiy<,"*' l iy iyA' ^y^yiV :4y<y<," ' ^y^yi^' :4yiyi''' y y y

^yiyiV :<,yiyi.' ' :iyiyi'''" liy^yi^' ^y^yiV liyiyi,*" Ny y v :iyiyi'^' :<.yiyiy

130-

1'

002 34

_SANOYCLAY, light brown, sWf, fine-grained sand SAND, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained,

_po_orly graded _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / SAND, gray-brown, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel

CL ^ p .

SW

135-

iy4y<,y Ay^yiy •liyiyiy 'i^^y^y Ay^yi"^' ^y^yiy ..*...*...*.*

SILTY SANO, daric brown, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented

SM

-140-

Tl

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



iLOWS IGRAPH-6 IN. |ie LOQ DEPTH

^ 4 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO. U B ANAL.

PRS-VAPOR

S P E C . LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses W a L DATA

145—

150—

155 —

160 —

165—

1 7 0 -

-175-

SILTY SAND, dari< brown, very dense, very fine lo Jin2:grqined., ligl:iJly,£gnTgDted_ _ _ _ _ / CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine -grained sand

SM "ML"

SANO, gray-brown, very dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, poorly lo well-graded

S \ ^ SP

SANDY C U Y , light brown, very stiff, trace _lintgreUQ.ed.ianjL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /

SANO, light brown, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, well-rounded, mostly

_guartz grainSj.lrace fine gravej_ ^ CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

CL svv

ML

SILTY SAND, daric brown, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, slightly cemented

SANO, brown, very dense, very fine to coarse-grained, micaceous

S

SM

SW

i y yi' '

:i,y y<,' ' i yiy ' " y y*,'' '

i y y y iy y y ;<,yi,yiy i y y y Ny yv : y y • y y y

nyiy^y

2S

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



FCOT? SIN.

mm. ICLOG

DEPTH

1—175-SAMPLE mm

NO,

TO-ANAL.

PRS— VAPOR

y. REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses W a L DATA

ISO—

185—

190 —

195 —

200—

205 —

SANO, brown, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, micaceous

SW

-210-

below 180 feel, coarse-grained sand

below 184 feet, pink grains, minor sandy clay lenses

CLAYEY SILT, olive, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand

ML

SILTY CLAY, pink, stiff, some cemented pieces CL

SANDY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay

ML

below 205 feet, some minor brown clay lenses

SILTY SANO, dari< brown and gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained

SM

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

0 = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



oRS-VAPOR

SLOWS SIN.

GRAPH-ICLOQ

DEPTH

•210-SAMPLE SAMPLE

NO, U B ANAL.

y. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA

215—

220—

225 —

230-

235—

240 —

SILTY SAND, dari< brown and gray, very dense, very Jinetofjne-grained SANO, white and peach, very dense, very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel (volcanlclastic lapilli)

SAND, dari< gray, very dense, line to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel, minor silty sand lenses

SM

SP

SW

at 222 feet, silty sand lens

SANDY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay

ML

: y<,yiy <y yi ' s' ' yiy :<,y<,yiy • ^ yiy . y y y i y y y

<,y<,yiy Ay<.y y teyiy :iy<,yiy ^yiy^y

.'.*.*.*.*.• y y y

! y ,yy ryiyiy sy y y : y<.yiy

rt^y^y rtiy^y .<,yiyiy . . • fc . ' . fc . * •

<,yiyiy .i,yiyi,y K tiy y iiy^yi' ' ^yiyi^' [iy y y :iyiyiy ;iyiy4y [iy y y i yiyiy :iy4yi,y iy^y^y iyiyi,y iy^y^y ^yiy•iy ^yiy^y ' yiyiy . .y y y :<.yiy*y kyiy**" i yiyi' '

-245- SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, stiff CL

U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLIT BARREL

H = HOLD



DEPTH

h-245-3AMPLE

NO. ANAL. VAPOR 14 REC. LrmOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses IIN. WELL DATA

250-

SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, stiff CL

255—

260 —

265 —

270-

275 —

-280-

I U = THIN WALL TUBE

C = CUTTINGS

R = ROCK CORING

O = OTHER

S = SPLrr BARREL

H = HOLD

lix A-3

COMC^Ptesser&McKee;;^^

J

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION

100

80

S 60 ci

tn

<

40 w o a: w O K

20

COBBLES SAND S/ir OR CUY COBBLES

COARSE FINE cause MEOIUU RNE S/ir OR CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U i l . ÂNDilRD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER

Page 4 o f 4 3/4. 3/8 -t 10 20 i.Q 60 140 200

10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER

<^ t

\

\ \

\ \

\ \

i \ \

( M i l 1—I—I r r r i n - t - r - 1 1 rtt n — 1 — ( I I I 1 1 1 1" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I—( -

10-=

40

w

60 ^

O

CL,

80

10 100

SYMBOL BORING (asj DESCRIPTION O #71293

• #71294

A #71295

SAND. Silty (SM)

SAND, Silly (SM)

SAND, Silty (SM)

Reraark : TEST METHOD: C136

Project No. JOB 10969 - APPL, INC.

The T-wining Labs Inc.

Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.

UNLÎED SOIL CLAkSSIFICATION

COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SILT OR CUY COBBLES COA«SE ONE MEDIUM

SILT OR CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STAJtDAM) SIEVE No. HYDHOUETER

Page 4 of 4

100 Z/A. 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200

80

o w

>-m 60

I—(

m CO < cu

g 40 w

W PL,

20

0 10' 10^ lb 1 10"' 10"

GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER

SnffiOL BORING ^fft?^ ^ f%) DESCRIPTION

O jf71519SB SAND. Silty (SM)

• #71520SB SANO, Silty (SM)

Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C136

1

\ \

\ \

\

)

)

1(

Project No. JOB 11021 - APPL. INC.

The TVining Labs Inc. G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.

Fresno, CA

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I


COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SFLT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE

SFLT OR CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER

Page 4 of 4

100 3/4. 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200

80

O I—(

« 53: r->

CD 6 0

(n V) <

S 40 W o Oi O K

20

«: r—t::

^

\ \

\

V 10' 10' 10 1 10"'

GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER 10" v-3

SYMBOL BORING ^fft?^ ^ f%) DESCRIPTION O 71373 SAND. Silty (SM)


20

40

K O »—1

w

O Ci3

W P i

60 g W O

O H

80

100

10 r3


The Twining Labs Inc. G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.



COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE RNE cause MEDIUM FINE

SILT OR CUY


I I

100

80 E-

m 60

CO < Pu,

g 40 w o w

20

1 £ e

1 V

\ \

\ y \

\

A \ V \ )

1

l l l l l l l 1 I I I M i l — I — r 1 1 ( 1 1 1 T 1 1' I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 -r--i ••

10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER

10" 10

DEPTH LL SYMBOL BORING ( f t ) {%) %) DESCRIPTION

Q 1 • APPLiD icyoeTis

• 2 APPL ID #706488

SAND, Silty (SM)

SAND, Silly (SM)

Remark : TEST METHOD:ASTM C136

• Corresponding CDM ID # 2416-SB-B6-002 Correspondino CDM ID # 2416-SB-B6-001

Project No. APPL, INC.

The Twining Labs Inc.

Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No,


COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SILT OR.CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE CCMRSC MEDIUM RNE

SILT OR.CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE m INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER

100

80 E-K I—*

w

m 60 c2) S CO

PH

g 40 w o

PL,

20

10'

3 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 Page 4 of 4

1

l l l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111,1 ' ' f V

I 1

10' 10 1 10" GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER

10"

20

40

E-ix; o I—-I

P3

«

H

60 g w o w

80

100

10"

SYMBOL BORING ^fft?^ W L _ (X) DESCRIPTION O 71165S SAND. Silty (SM)






COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE MEDIUM FINE

SILT OR CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN WCHES U.3. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER

100

80

o

>-

« 60 O t—t

CO V3 < PL.

40

20

0

3/4 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 Page 4 of 4

— t

\

\

\

\

\

)

0

2(

8

10" GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER

SYMBOL BORING

O 71051S

^ DESCRIPTION

SAND. Silty (SM)


Project No. JOB 7105IS - APPL. INC.



I I

100

80 E-

O

t —

>-« CQ

e I—

CO CO <3 PL, E-

Ciq CJ

w pL,

60

40

20


COBBLES GR/t VEL SAND SILT OR CUY COBBLES

COARSE C(wc:c MEDIUM - FINE SILT OR CUY


Page 4 of 4 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200

E

\ \

\ \

\

\

\

\

\

\

^

1

n 1 1 1 1 1 1 II I I I I 1 I I I I 1 » I' I I I I 1 1 1 I" ' I I I I — 1 1 p i l l —I—1

0

20

40

60

80

100

GRAIN SIZE IN Mn.UMETER

SYMBOL BORING

O 70S38S

• 70837S

DEPTH (ft) ML A DESCRIPTION

SAND, Silly (SM)

SAND, Silly (SM)

Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C13S

Project No. JOB . 10894 - APPL, INC,




COBBLES GRAVEL SAND

SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE RNE CCVkRSE MEDIUM RNE

SILT OR CUY

U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN DICHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER

100 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200

80

w

60

ro CO < OH

^ 40 O Cti w Pu

20

0

1

l l l l l l l 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l l l 1 II 1 1 1 ' . * ^ f . J" 1 1

10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER

10""

20

40

60

80

10

icr*'

SYMBOL BORING DESCRIPTION

Q 78S00SB

• 78601 SB

SAND, Silty (SM)

SILT, Sandy (ML)

Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM D42E

Project No. APPL



•.-v.:'.'.----.'•

>

3 a ><* Cd

•••'.•-i' f-'".'"'

-• r

. "'--

'·. ')' i\. ': i .

·.·:

( ~ . -~ :'

,I.

',

' ' \~ -~-

. •,.: ·, ., ., .

. :_ . ·-~ .

\

_·,· ·.; ''' }

. · ..• ',:

. '~'

'·'

.. ' . ~: /, . f'. . "-.;:-,:· .·~ l:

• J' \ ~-

:' ' ' . > I ::""~~

• ' -7,~ . ".l'•• "

• 'J:''.'

", :/ ·~- ~--

·' •' ~ "'·-.:, ,::- /;,.:<~·:.:~:~ -~.:: .. '' '~::·:' .. -_··. -: ·. CQ~ .Pi111P presse~. ~-McJ<~e ·

'' -~~ <;_. ~>,.·~-~-~~::_ -~~: ·.~:~->~:~i~ ' . ~-· .-~·-/. ; ' . ~-- •'

.. ;: ... ;. ',

.... \. ~ . . . t ~· •, ~:- :,1 •

' ' '

.. ::•-

---=....C""'--"--'-'-.C.....Lc.i.,~-"=..u...-'-'..·' ...:.:'_.----:"':~\"':·c.·...:~·"-,·._,:._:_:...:'!'-"-, '--'--'..:L....:CO.l.:.C.:..:.C.C::--..,~~~'-"'-~.:_-'-'-'--'L....:::,:~~\·"<

". "'\ . ~-. ,\ .

,' -~-:")" .JI ';-,/ ~ •• .. • ..

''' ·, i lr,

.·-:-_-,·

,' ~·. c •

•'· .... _.-.. (•

;,

)'~(~~ ·'._;: ~ \ !t, ', • '

)>' ,·

!···,

: ,•) • h --·:-

• "t • '~'' ': i'• •: I ';. ' '

..... ·.· ••. r_.,"..(·

'· ·, ..... •,-(

.'J.

? ~,- 'l _,

·."' .· :.->~ ., '":~ ~"'··.

' ' 1 ,, ,'- i- ··'·'

: ' ',.., : . ' . . ;. . ~ I ,"

:r ·,~ ·' . .. )

·-;;., ..... '

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard Flush Mount

WELL NO.: JjlJV-- Installation:

Projcct No.:^4It? Client/Project:

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: i<£^:'Oi^/cc f^j/,

Comp. Started: jo^.^ / 3 2^5 Comp. Ended: 'Y/S'/?^ I 7 "iî

Built Well Coordinates:

Elev. Height GS Height GS Height-Depth BGS

0.00'

Depth BGS

^1 3

" T "

rr

7 ^

7 f

I 7r

Borehole dia.

PROTECnVE CSG Material/Type Diameter _ _ _ _ Depth BGS

.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )

.Weep Hole ( Y / N )

SURFACE PAD Composition & Size

RISER PIPE ^^^keA-A-e.

Diameter ^ " ^-Total Length (TOC to TOS^ ^ '( 4. oc t~.

ORQUT ^ ^ A' Composition & Proportions ^tfrni-,^ o rt-w

Tremied ( Y /(g)) iremied ( Y /CNJ) ,i Interval—• - ^ 7 .ft^^.f

CENTRALIZERS ( (£ ) /N) Depih(s) _ _ J X : _ Z £ 1 _

SEAL ^ / Type /Se'-iri .iirf- -fc',Ur'-Tf) . Source v'.rAe:'-/^V-'H >c.' -. ( RAtr . Vl<r,; ^ Setup/HydratioiL'Time Vol. Fluid Addedt LE?!-Tremied ( Y ''^

ni.TER PACK , Type Amt Used Tremied ( Y /J )) Source f7> t..'*'iryr~ir^ Cr. Size Dist.

SCREEN ^

Diameter. , Slot Size & Type 0. d/O. i-^^.^; lyl/t-c.U.^'.-^r-..^^lu-; Interval BGS .^.T-?/ .^^^^J-

SUME (Y/(Q..^^j^ y z t i l O-^^f Interval Br..»-^ / ->-fe ( \- >- Length I -K-^g.-l Bottom CAP ((;$)/N ) ^

PACKna PLUG . y ni Material ^ ' ^ ^ T ' U r< Setup/Hydration time ! Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • Standard Flush Mount

WELL NO.: MW- ^Q^y^ X /S

Project No.: Client/Project: ^ , T ^ /fesv^*

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: tSeVCf.c

Comp. Started: "V/f/^tZ, //oa Comp. Ended: T/i^ci^j /G/o

Built By: ^ ^^,,„^^.^ \ \K.clâA Ur<^.t\ Well Coordinate.i:: Well Coordinate.i::

Ifl ^ , Elev.

GS Height-Depth BGS

0.00 '

E l e v . T Q ^ . ^ ^ Dfcpili BOS

/<f 7

3

//z.

r- I

IZ2

I'2-1

T D : / E 7 '

/O'

- I\t,

PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter .Water Tight Seal {,^1

SURFACE PAP /: , r / o , r , ' Composition & Size L-»f-v-v<;-U. CC <C^X

RISER PIPJ

Diameter •4-" a-.t> Total Length nrOC to TOS1 /f^ (-V V

GROUT

Composition & Proportions < •-/-7?'// /?•7 . l.

Tremied < ^ / _ N ) ) . v s - c s - r ^ r^c-"

Interval P ' -f f •r-i-

CENTRALIZERS (CS/N ) Depthro / f Z - i / f L '

Type •^'^'^ i/^.^0 Source /Vir-:r>>>? f<:!.VV (T Setup/Hydration Time 'Â Vol. Fluid Added5E Tremied ((f)/ N )

FILTER PACK vx-, ^ I ^ Type '• i -?y---^ S; I f r-Amt Used / / S-A^ I fyly (h • lo^Vi Tremied ( Y 1^) ^ Source <^ s/yi e' T-/ J Gr. Size Disl.__^£££J

SCREEN Typ,.. ^ /VC

Slot Size f' Typp. t^. 1^ " KK-a-e^<;iÛ,t? , J.jj

Interval BGS tl ^ -4-6 I 7-12-. Hor^ j-

SUME ( Y ,^ SicJ^ ^ 0 1 Inrerval RG.S L ? ^ - < r l ^ r Length "i-^^^ T Interval BGS Bottom CAP

RACKRLL PLUG Material

Borehole dia.

Setup/Hydration tim Tremied ( Y / N )

lime i .

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard Flush Mount

WELL NO.: *Ô0rK~[^

Project No.: q|U|12.-(M>HVki9) Client/Project: ^ < 3 ^ , } U y ^

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: ^P)j^J:£

Comp. Started: l - l l - ^ Z it Comp. Ended: ^[ 2_- ^ 2_ 3 Â

Built By: f! , Ji J? 1 R tX a/A ^^WU Well Coordinate.!::

•.lev. . leight JS Height 5S Height >epih BGS

—HCi2ll

PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS



SURFACE PAD . ^ / H Composition & Size (^.^y-'^'^M:. ^-t^ d h . (

RISER PIPE osir- ^ \ i I c-r- Type 5< Uc-xUle- < >0

^ \i/-v<r..K , Type Diameter Total Length (TOC to TOS)

GROUT i Composition &] Proportionji -^^^^

Tremied ((S?/N ) , -L.

CENTRALIZERS ,r6P/N'> r ^ I

Type 6>\<:i . 'g> -/:-l ^4>D (v/.-Cv Source (_f>-tv4?-< -.-\'?\sr tv\ (T, Setup/Hydration Time , Tremied (^1 N )

nLTER PACK..JL, • , ' Type 'tvv3 "T << -<'\ -X\^<fA

Vol. Fluid Arirlfrtin gal.

Amt Used J^&-^0O•\:ty>^ - l-y^^^r^r Tremied ((^JN) 7^ Source <^\g.,.m'g^'rtv^'ay, ,

Gr. Size Dist.

Diameter SîW'l-W Slot Size & Type V O ( C>'' t.W\>r.. • f;(otAv/-| Interval BGS fl«^y?-^7^ 1^^ / -T^.^^^

Interval BGS I^Âz.-nS ^L. Bottom CAP ( Y / N )

ength

PACKFILLPLUG tro ^ J Material St^f^ci

Borehole dia.

Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Slaiidaid Flu&li Muunt-

WELLNO.: 1*? C P I T I . ZA Installation: f rf c r o ^«^rk /v L3-i^;ll itc:

Project No.: IC?' 1 (Z.-H'M W Client/Project: (^^^j,^^ ^ ^r£>bY\D

Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: j/3 2.Mf; f<

Comp. Started: "j -^7 ^ ^2— Comp. Ended: 7^2.7 -*1 2_

Built By: {lui^^r^ [^\L^r•<k^^ (h.eCe^ Well Coordinates:

c?vef Height ftGjS_j^"T't-' GS Rfev

Depth BGS

Elev ^' -•

6^'

5

TO'

TD:

PROTECnVECSG Material/Type Diameter _ _ _ _ _ Depth BGS

.Water Tight Seal ( Y /


SURFACE PAD Composition &'Size

Diameter M \^cX<\ Total Length (TOC to T O S ) _ _ j 2 i ^ _ £ « £ i 2 L _

QEom: _^ - r -f:? U-L Composition & .Proportions u ip'i: (L u>-rTr<-

Tremied ( Y ^ N ) Interval

CENTRALIZERS ((YVN), ^

Source^ r.'\<r-W< / fôld Setup/Hydratioji " Time -36 ^ rlyni Fluid Addedli] Tremied ( Y /<$D)

nLTER PACK Type ^ Amt Used I ")/z,-^^<^K-> Tremied ( Y 7(H>) Source ^-^ "- Gr. Size Dist,

. \ C-^,Y^^C>.^-\-'^V^<\

niameter M ;vN<lL\ Slot Size A Type . !<? yV^Jk WV-yd^vlVNe, •^n I Interval BGS CgP 9:0-rfcyl^

SUMP ((y/N)^, ' Interval BGS Bottom CAP (gO/ N )

Length 9

Borehole dia.

Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Stiindac[LJLlualte:"M»ttnt

WELL NO.: JAi^l^Tf ^m- Installation: /nifrc.^Q <^y^^,TT^^y 1^,.JOJ:/I.L /^/^J^^'S /Itcr^cr^^ f""^^

Project No.: Client/Project: ^^^ry o/^ /=Z-e^^Q

Contractor: /3^LiK Drlg Contractor: fêVOfi.

Comp. Started: "Z^^'/^z. (^^ ^ 3^ ) Comp. Ended: ~7/zi /<? f /Ô ) - 7 : 7.-?: •. •f,2

Built By: 7^^ <^?c/0/^J\\VV^ AW^C^ L\Oe\U Well Coordinates:

l l ev .

height J S Height . J S Height->;pih BGS

0.00'

Elev. Depth BGS

/ 2 /

)1

TD: / 3 a ' T

/o

-/2.I

- / 3 6


SURFACE PAD Composition & Size

RISER PIPE Type /^^CZ /^-O



Diameter -O- . Total Length (TOC to TPS) ( 2.M -/\i'eA

GROUT Compositioa, Sc. .Proportions -'S-

Tremied ( Y X N S . f Interval.

CENTRALIZERS ( @ / N ) Depth(s)__Z^4_„__^3£_

Source ^>'>rcTîC I 'QY^C- _j Setup/Hydration Time A/A Vni pinirf ArtHrrt^frCgal. Tremied / N )

nLTER PACK Type Amt Used Tremied ( Y / ( N ) ) Source i-C/P/^/^/-.ITUJ fi\ Gr. Size Dist. g x Z - o

SCREEN . „ o y

n i a m e l e r ^ - j , /

Slot Size & Type Interval BGS /^(:» ~ / 36 >'v>l-~

Borehole dia.

SUMP (@)/N) , , C,,^.V Interval BGS J ^ k j l d Z s l l Length Bottom CAP ( ( fV N )

PACKRLL PLUG P [ , ^ Material X;^ N^> r\\.K.<\ Setup/Hydraiion time iii. Tremied ( Y / N )

2-

MONITORING W E L L CONSTRUCTION LOG - GUiidJLJ Fluiih Muunt

WELL NO.: Cî»w-3A Installation: fîêS^'^ S'^/^/TAi&y^/ÔpLL SWa: ^co'i^sir 0.=

Project No.: Client/Project: ^,j<./ or /=krs^.,i '^^''^ ^^^^^

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: '3e^ci<

Comp. Started: •%5/'f7 (/^^'^J Comp. Ended: ^/s^J/cj. //ixsa ^

Built By: ^ ^ . T ^ ^ < ^ ' ^ \ \ \ \ U i v A t A ^^J'Xt Well Coordinates:

Elev. Height GS Height GS Height Depth BGS

Elev. Depth BGS

-ir

8^'

C

• :TD: er/

PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Tvpe '•i'-' ^'f^^ Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / Depth BGS .Weep Hole ( Y / N )

SURFACE PAP 7-^21^'-Composition & Size '^^'"-^

RISER PIPE Typfi fi^^ S2H Diameter ~ Total Lenpih frOC 10 TOS^ t-^ 7 U f f J '

I

T GROUT

Composition & Proportions ( <r^r^r //$^,r:>^-i

Tremied ( Y /(S>

Interval - •SJ ' '=,1.<: CENTRALIZERS (S)/ N )/ D e p t h ( s ) _ _ _ ^ £ ^ _ ^ r _

SEAL Type / e/-)" '! Source t/f/f^^ Setup/Hydration Time £f_ Vol. Fluid Addedl^l Tremied ( Y / fi)) 'S"

FILTER PACK , l , Type /-fÂiTr^f^rrTi ^.t A \ J Ami IlsPrt /7 \l( V, /-- .<r Tremied ( Y / ( ^ Source ^ff^f'-Gr. Size D i s t . _ j f < ^ £ _

SCREEN ^ „ ^ Typ. /î/C •S'^ry 4-:^ ni«m>..t,-r ^"JP.O.

Slot Size & Type Interval BGS -CVo-U

Borehole dia.

Interval BGS 7feÛpth <• / Bottom CAP ( S / N ) ' ^

BACKFILL PLUG ,y Material Mt: X \^0. Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONST

WELL NO.: CL-CTT^CL-

RUCTION LOG - Standard Flusir-Mouitt-

Installation:p*p£,^r^r? îxk^KWr^j-. Site:

Projcct No.:;Z4\b-l|;2-'lK-^'<DR Client/Project: CJ\ \ \ /^ TDQ f=rk.< l C»

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: £>£,ti\',

Comp. Started: <%-7-^:2^ \^0^ Comp. Ended: <^ 2 . \ (3 3

Built By: 3 - , ?) - yrey Xje I ^ i l f 6iro\;<-. Well Coordinates: Well Coordinates:

Elev. _ fleight JS Height JS Height Depth BGS

"Iff: Z:il£llZf

5'

,5

TD: ;2.H2,-5

PROTECTIVE CSG I | Material/Type ^T^jtA Diameter _ Depth BGS

.Water Tight Seal ((^/ N )

.Weep Hole ( Y / ^

SURFACE PAP ^ ' r-" • L Composition & Size n ^5 <^ C^r^CfCXC..

RISER PIPE I 1 1 Type ^j^J^-^y^'-îL, ViO Type ^„ Diameter 2 Total Lenpth rrOC to TO.S ^2-1. ^ ^

GROUT I C ^ l l \^ Compositipn & Proportions H '^h ^ l-psrv/vd,

Tremied ((5)/N ) / Interval —

CENTRALIZERS N ) , ^ ^ . , ^,

Type Source 1^ Setup/Hydration Time V ft Vol. Fluid Arirtf.rilO gal. Tremied (^ / N )

RLTER PACK • Typt Amt Used US fe-yg; S~ Tremied (a>/N ) 1^. Source C^\e.^rr\-e^f\-r\.-/^<^ Gr. Size Dist.

"^yP ^-n ^ ]

Slot Size A Type ^'^]P >^^ '•-Ui v-ig,^ Interval BGS ^\^.^' 4-^ Z-P^H,^'

SUME (^/N) . ^ Interval BGS 3.qZ.S-x35 Length Bottom CAP ((2)/N )

BACKnLL PLUG ^4 Material "

Borehole dia.


MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - S^gftdaiU Plush'-Moufft

WELL NO.: i*B«' Installation:f^-e.,4>^p L<xv\Jiy Site: l^cpr-^ A^J^^

Project No.:;Z.m^^|\2r(>A-H'(tof Client/Project: C^\\-yj( ~Vvre-4)rvC?

Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: B,£,vt\;

Comp. Started: ^^-^-'^Z- {1C>^ Comp. Ended: g - /^-^^ Z. 9>?yO

Built By: \^ i\\ i^royi^ ^^CJ^^ Well Coordinates:

Elev.

GS Height GS Height

PROTECTIVE CSG y , \ Material/Type t^rOg^ Diameter, Depth BGS 1 ^

Water Tight Seal C ^ / t Weep Hole ( Y / ( ^

•SURFACE PAD L J J Composition & Size 6.-<9K^gXig-., 3 ^ 3 y f

Diameter id , Total Length (TOC to TOS;) IZC?

CROm: ^ I r , n , - L / Compositi9n & Proportions .AMdi'o g>r

Tremied ( /p/W) > » Interval l l O ^ " ^

CENTRALIZERS ((9/N ) . r>epthrs^ tZLP,. W^. CÔ

•Source -Ri^C^ U iyKg ;.- ?!. Setup/Hydration Time Vni Pinirf AH/UMIO

Tremied ((J> N )

FILTER PACK i , i J* o Type rA<g -V"ev-€,M SilvcLa.. <!Cr.<A J Amt Used U• ^ Ujyvûoi^ Tremied ( t W / ) T Source C-l t' '/VN 'g./-/v'r'> <si Gr. Size Dist

Diameter Jil , , ^ Slot Size & Type C7.0\0 * v^«^-^WiVe<^ Interval BGS t •z:.<g» P. b -t^-^^

Borehole dia.

S^ME (^/N) ,^^ , , ^ / , ' Interval BGS J ^ S J ^ Z l Z S Length Bottom CAP ((^/N )

PACKHLL PLUG I/] Material Ci±! Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )


WELL NO.: Jfi^CC/r\'4^

RUCTION LOG - St:>nd.titl Frubh Mmint-

Installation: /7^^yi6 .^j. XA.*jDf=ic(_ ^'^'^'^'•Sir.,7A 's /Ic'î-.ê^ry! /^,r^

Project No.: Client/Project: Ci'r^ o/=" /^^y./^

Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: j^Vdy/d Z>-^''CCr^j C:,

Comp. Started: 7/^^f2 (/2-^s>£i ) Comp. Ended: ^ r / f ^ )

Built By: S . O - ^ i ^ U v 7 u t Well Coordinates:

Height JS Height JS Height

fa 1

TD: 'TO

Material/Type. Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )

Weep Hole ( Y / N ) Depth BGS

Em.£ y -T' '-i ^ U Composition & Size SURFACE PAP . -f• J 1 , , r

RISER PIPE Typ« Diameter Total Length (TOC to TQ.S ' (r i-' d Cc-T,

ROUT omposition &

GROUT Composition & Proportions ^lf=y^^'^r Aê'îT

Tremied ( Y Interval

CENTRALIZERS N ) Depth(s) :go.- <r > T

SEAL Type / .c-'. rz>' ' re "Th-L c-.rs Source ^^Sv< //-.?o/'<-» - ^ fi-.-y r Setup/Hydration Time VOL" Fluid Addcdl^^'-Tremied ( Y /CSI)

HLTER PACK ^ ., Type = 3 ^^^/•.i-^f -/ ) v \ yV <v Amt Used / z^ j:i^<. (Y'YMV^. Tremied ( Y /C^) Source Cc/fy i /-.) "7 Gr. Size Dist.

SCREEN _ ^ ^ Type -^R/^ Diameter. Slot Size & Type a .o /o" tirA .<'-U.s -.- < Interval BGS .n.y • g4-

Bottom CAP ( C ^ N )

BACKFILL PLUG • ,/ ryi . Material yv?V? T

Borehole dia.


t

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - SUmdard Fhreh--Mognj>

WELL NO.:_-MW- <r/Dm Installation: /^^/S^Sô J^''/i.^<6>ô^^..'i. Site: J ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ / -

Project No.: 2M \U\^ r \ ^ ^ ! C ^ Client/Project: ^ i r t - . ^ o

Contractor: Drlg Contractor:

Comp. Started: 7 / z . f . / f i /^/doa ) Comp. Ended: f Z { )

Built By: 73^ ^yuiO-/ er \ \ K ^ ( V Q . A Well Coordinates:

Elev Height GS Height . GS Height-Depth BGS

0.00'

^ Elev. ^ ^ - ^ g Depth BGS

//a —T

/ g

/3-2..S

13 6

TD: / 3 6

I 1

PROTECTIVE CSG / ^ ,2.L ^L , . j7 -v ;M . r c O <L/ T

Mater ia l /Type <Ttfe3.e>r Diameter 1 O Cv^<:-K Water Tight Seal ( O ^ Depth BGS \/t.^-irf'.etr^ Weep Hole ( Y / ( H ^

SURFACE P A D Composition & Size

RISER PIPE .e . 5 ? ^ Type ^

Diameter ^ • • f Total Length (TOC to TO.SI 1 X ^ ^ , t ? i f ? r

GROUT 'Tv^.^ni^ \^^>iMrUv^ Composition & Proportions ^^''^^Cf J- //S^-.\r:^>irt

Tremied ( Y ^ , , . 1 / , / • _ L Interval U H ' ^ ^ ^ - ^

CENTRALIZERS ^ / N ) Dep ih f s l , / 5 3

Source / . a^ j fS r f i J ^ l \W\ ( , .?..^.<- r----^.r Seiup/Hydration Time A^'^ y^ j pj^j^j Added'JL Tremied ( ( T ) / N )

n L T E R PACK Type A ^ a ' J m-?~ / Amt Used Tremied ( Y iCS)) Source {^g/ 'îf A)T/.-J/ '<

Gr. Size Dist.,

SCREEN Type C / ^ ^ d / ^ / t l

Borehole dia.

Diameter -f-" Jr.-7>.

Slot Size & Type a • O/(} yJ^fU \A<7.<-J^/\v <; Interval BGS / ^ Z ' ^ - I32.S-

SUME (^/N ),.-^ J'XA^C r J Interval BGS _ Q Z ^ J 2 l } i ^ t n g i h - f r i^Tf

Bottom CAP (($)/ N )

R A C K H L L PLUG v V ^ O l Mater ia l ( ^ O ^ 1 ^ 0 -Setup/Hydration time \ Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • SUudmUriuJi MuimU

WELL NO.: MW- Co/^ Installation: frCss io j!5. '" i?>-Â«>=>-'<I Site: /^C^JIL^/) /virto

Project No.: j^M(A-(l2-(K-4\\^'Client/Project: C r - ^ o/r /^..rrô

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: £cYC/^ P/SILC/^JC,

Comp. Started: "^/"/^/z. Comp. Ended: V / ' / f ^^T^xS ^

Built-^^y: jf^^^^ r^,,K>t-L. Well -CofmTuTJT^^

' \ ' \

ilev. Height JS Height JS Height Depth BGS

Borehole dia.

PROTECTIVE CSG To Material/Type Diameter _ ^ _ _ _ _ _ Depth BGS



SURFACE PAP Composition & Size

RISER PIPE Type Diameter -i^" Total Length (TOC to TOS)

GROUT Composition & Proportions

Tremied /<§)) Interval

CENTRALIZERS ((5)/N )

SEAL ^ Type /P^,r^.,,r:£ /'eit.!~r<, S puree k .; -"/^ -/ ///;/=->/• Setup/Hydration Time , Tremied ( Y /(gj)

Vol. Fluid Added't l al-

nLTFR PACK Type Amt Used

remied ( Y ource i "" ' 7-/ AJ /-I

Diameter^ " ' Type.

Slot Size AVvpe ^.dra-Interval BGS \ /^3-/ .^?'

SUMP ( Y ^ \ Interval Rfig"" - -'N Bottom CAP « f > N )'

PACKnLL PLUG . Material A/ -f

Length

Setup/Hydration time \_ Tremied ( Y / N ) '

MONITORING W E L L CONSTRUCTION LOG —Standard FlUl.ll MwHrt-

WELLNO.: M5Sifc CDt^l-Mc Installation: • Site: Fv-,».svvo S-c.v vL*<.,/ji Uc

Project No.: :2}{\ir'-[\2A\\'^M Client/Project: e . V ^ o l wt,

Contractor: ^ ^ \v \^ c D rv\ Drlg Contractor: 'RUL.V^ \V

Comp. Started: -j _ Ti _e 7_ Comp. Ended: ~] ^ ^ Z L — < "TL-

Built By: E . c W ^ ^ i fAor^s^ / IZcV, Uonê. / Well Coordinates:

U oc." hor,V^ -7 J / /

Well Coordinates:

U oc." hor,V^ -7 J / /


' Elev. 2- 2 -07 T Depth BGS " /

/ /

A O

V s-

lo"

PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type. Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / 1

Weep Hole ( Y / N ) Depth BGS

SURFACE PAP r. 4. f J ^. , Composition & Size C^tfru;.Lk-XC c. A /Cy t

RISER PIPE o./, ^ 1 \ i Type rV>(— S- c-.We..rV<-\r-- fiG Diameter <T cty Total Length (TOC to TCtRS •^/:> ^\ ^

^ GROUT Composition & Proportions H a.^^ C1

Tremied ((25/ N ) Interval. 0 — ^ ^ S " -Vr .

CENTRALIZERS (0/H )

^ SEAL Type. Source ^' \z i ^ C

Setup/Hydration T«fte-Tremied ((S)/ N )

nLTER PACK Type .9 y £ o 3 r o>NV<-vc»-> Amt Used Tremied {(S)/ N ) Source Gr. Size Hist. ^ ."-S > z. o

- SCREEN ^ Type p y C Diameter ^ Slot Size & Type t rn a'' •s-A-e-V- t'Ar^ U-^< ^ S I Interval BGS J 1 n •(<'<.'Jr

Bottom CAP ( Q / N )

BACKnLL PLUG - /So pVoo^ Material ^

Borehole dia.



WELL NO.: MW^ CD>^n

RUCTION LOG --^StftBdantdEteslpgaettirt

Installation: /îgrs^î ^/.jn/^rSy lyAiD>îi>, \5'î^: <^^.^,^'<; ///êÂso 's^îz^

Project No.: \i':-\( - lVA~U"vlP^ Client/Project: C'/TV 0/= prisSfâ

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: S^y<^'^

Comp. Started: 7/zz.Jcî_ f^83 7 ) Comp. Ended: '^/ZZ/'jz, f53Z

Built By: < Lr>.o ( T / l f - - \ \ \ V v <LW(;A U o k U Well Coordinates:

-J -J ilev.

eight JS Height JS Height-Depth BGS

0.00'

Depth BGS

5h^

2-1

61-

T P :

O

PROTECTIVE CSG —roTi,e.ô'-i'^r^y^<jr^ Material/Type "^"^"^^ Diameter Depth BGS



SURFACE PAP / , 7~ v' ^ ?^ L Composition & Size C^^-^.U^L^f Z - XC y -I RISER PIPE Type Diameter Total Length nrOC to TOS ^ '•^ l^r- K'-iT

GROUT Composition & Proportions ... ^'•!\"'^>' ''^•••: ,r~o.

Tremied ( Y r--\ V C. U Interval O <^ S / - f , r - r

CENTRALIZERS (CS/N) Depthrs^ i-^' âo ,&C

SEAL Type /3)€.. yi>Aj irp 7 f7 i-f 'r'< • -4- ^ .Source yoCCC^Y /CtÂA'^t^.cd . C 2A\f.\ f\ C r., Setup/Hydration fime ^2^^'ôl. Fluid AHHrcU^gal. Tremied ( Y / ( ^ /S"

nLTER PACK Type /-fa^^^nfTSir-f Amt Used /Zr\WU/^'^<^^ Tremied ( Y Source < cey> A/T"? A/ Gr. Size Dist. (g^^-Q

SCREEN c' . y,^ Type /'t/tr Sch'

Borehole dia.

Diameter ^ " -XT Z>. i , Slot Size A Type O.O / ^>Vrt.^k>>NT> ':>V¥rÂ Interval BGS 6>o - •f'<^<:\r

SUME « 5 ( ^ O A / (O l / i V r , , / , Inteival BGS / 'O - . V 14 Lenpth _ J A . _ i W > p Bottom CAP c5^N)

PACKnLL PLUG - ^ ^ . ^ Material f<0 f l u Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard FhishHVtetttU

WELL NO.: -SBS'(l.£)W\ - Inslallalion:|^^^,ofwi->-r\7>.rn Lp>/rî^\~' Site:

Project No.:Zm^-(}2. - f>A- 'it)^ Client/Project: (^;-(-^ ^ fre.<=^y^

Contractor: Drlg Contractor: ^^•^y^ { \

Comp. Started: "^-1- 2S:Ôpv^ Comp. Ended: 7 - 2. ^ 1: - Z C /7 m

Built By: ^^ . - -Pr ^ ^ -.C-j ^ X A l W U i

Well Coordinates:

Elev. Height GS Height . GS Height-Depth BGS

0.00 '

-^^"i^lev. TJJfAjJ Depth BGS

TD:

3 '

Borehole dia.

PROTECTIVE CSG . / Material/Type rHrv,>g, l Diameter, U21 Depth BGS I^T-

.Water Tight Seal ( Y / h

.Weep Hole ( Y / ( ^

SURFACE PAD . ^ , Composition & Size Ly-y-'^^<i.Ai' Z.'isP.'ji

RISER PIPE ^ - I V \ Tyne - ^ f -WA^^ \v - 't D Diameter S- ; . Total Length (TOC to T O S ) ^ _ ! X ^ ^ d I E i ^ E

GROUT ^ Composit,ion & Proportions \î>^^ \t^.C<..y~ f^^r^-r ^ [Qry . L-j^r , -zar ^b-^.." F-.-^-

Tremied (d^/ N ) Interval \—

CENTRALIZERS ((S^N)^_ Depth<-s^ ^^7^. 1^7

_ I

SEAL ^ ? • [ »; ' , Type P.'g -T<g''..>-- "^rl, Tg..; i tLTT Source •H'^--*X . - • ' j ^ , ' - '.•.:»- . Seiup/Hydralign Time J^î_ Vol Fluid AriHp.MlO Tremied ( Y /N>

PII ,TFR PACK Type Amt Used Tremied ((^/ N ^ ; . " Source C'g,-c /-i<' > 'r ', o. Gr. Size Dist S j L ^ i O —

SCREEN ^ f I I 11,^ ^ ^ i l / -Type S d / \ ' ! L d K i t , ' ^ D V - V C ^ Diameter ^ ! V .1>!A ^ Slot Size & Type . QIg> V' - ^\n-e, lg?T-v Interval BGS 1^4=*^" C ^ ^ ^ - '

SUME (i$>/N) , . /} ~7 Interval BGS f . ? ; ^ ' l 3 K Length ^ ^ ^ ^ Bottom CAP N )

PACKnLL PLUG . . / . ^ .pi Material ^^TrAfi V)c^ 1 lUq Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N ) I

I

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • SfeMtdai d-Htisli=*M<nurt

WELL NO.: CÎ'A.-<£'(Z Installation: tY-e>5a 'oo 's-i ATu ( ajA ;|l( '" :

Project No.:2m4-UZ.-|M-rtV!?f^ Client/Project: ^ 4-6 "Frk.€)(A.«i>

Contractor: J ^ ^ v \ l \ k D / . l l V f N ^ Drlg Contractor: ê^J{l,^ VC\\\lir\0^

Comp. Started: T -,2i/D - 2- Comp. Ended: 7~^\^-92_ ~

Built By: ^ l ^ A . ^ i f ^LCO t k'êh^<^ ^ ^ 6 0 6 Well Coordinates:

=lev Height JEM2-^^=;^Tr^r^

Depth BGS

PI Elev. Depth DGS

1

•JLf 1^'

TD

PROTECTIVE CSG . • I \ xw c-,. Material/Type f^^<iJK f i ^ e ^ Diameter tr>" Water Tight Seal N ^ Depth RG.S \ /zJ Weep Hole ( Y / ^


Diameter ^ , Total Length rrOC tn TO.S) ^ 1.2.'

C^SSsition^ & Prnp9r.ions~t^P€-"ir t^-fj^vv-l 6'-;^gl

Tremied ((5?/N ) I . ^ . ( Interval -f-i^ ' Ah

CENTRALIZERS ((Y^/N) f ' i »

7

Source . Seiup/Hydration Time Vol. Fluid Addp.filO gal. Tremied N )

nLTER PACK i ^ , Type hr\^-r<!./ê^1 ^C\v CJ^ Amt Used Tremied (|^/ N ) , . Source C-1 e>tvvgîr\^<\ Gr. Si7e Dist. g / - Z - O 33

Diameter » Slot Size & Type . interval BGS ^11^ -^(7 'ZSL^'

SUME <<5>/ N ) f ( Interval BGS y^-^^SfX. Bottom CAP 0( 7 N )

Length

Borehole dia.

BACKnLL PLUG Material _ _ _ _ Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / ^


WELL NO.T'SÎV^ CÔ-^R

RIirTTON T,OG - Stanriarrt-sHtrrfrJtteimt

Instal lation:7»f^^2,4^NWvv- Ukjr^\([ S>ic:

Project iio.: Z^tl->-\\2.'l^^-i\?Cf^ Client/Project: C^[-î^ "^rC-^xAO

Contractor: £ ^ \ ; Drlg Contractor:

Comp. Started: s l i ^ M - L . '^'•^^^ "bomp. Ended: 3/['^/'?2, \0\

Built By:^^;i4^.^3w"^yij2XjC^. •(KQ\ a,- ko -O^Tv Well Coordinates:

-


fed-Elev. Depth BGS

3'

^ 6 '

I

TD: • 7^'

PROTECTIVE CSG , | Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS

.Water Tight Seal ( Y / t



Diameter M-0

Total Length (TOC to TOS)!^:

GROUT Composition & Proportions

Tremied ( Y j : ^ ' ) ^ ^ , ' Interval p - ^ - T n

CENTRALIZERS fij? N ) Depth(s) 1(J 5/'

\ \D '^d\

Borehole dia.

S ource Hr^'OA'^^/f-V^ Seiup/Hydration Time I Wf> Vol, Fluid Added'ilL Tremied ( Y /&>) ^ bKjjL,(cfi.tS

nLTER PACK , , , ^ Type <llc^Â<l>K4^,'^yÂ tÔ • Ami Used Tremied ( Y Source <r. (g,>^< . -Gr. Size Dist.

Slot Size & Tvpp. .P(g7 t^^.<'.k;,AO- 'SVM Interval BGS ' -^c

SUME « t > N ;) I -1 r 4 Interval BGS T t? Length A >Vô\ Bottom CAP C^/N)

PACKnLL PLUG Material _ _ _ _ Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG —Standnrd-iffilgh-Mmml.

WELL NO.: "MW-C£7lfA-7ft Installation: ^ -,155 , L^XwACl l

Project No.:£MlW-UZ_-VVA-V\Vj7(? Client/Project: C i < 5 » ^ <2''6 A O

Contractor: C^XJ^- Drlg Conlractor: ê^îi^

Comp. Started: ZlZ.^ 1^2^ WAO^.y^, Comp. Ended: S / Z - ^ f i i . ^l3C?4)W^"^

Built By:^^^^\^, Grfilk /l^-^^ ?^^SiSL/^ Well Coordinates:

I •lev. _ leight 5S Height 3S Height Jcpth BGS

Depth BGS

1 TP: g&H'

T—

D

I 2.^' 2.0'




SURFACE PAP ^ -A .,f ;//! Composition & Size L^-->^-Â^. ^- ^- Y I

RISER nPE ie Typ

Diameter Total Length fTOC to TOS)A"Z,'

GROUT Composôn & Pro^jôns

Tremied ( Y / S O ^ , ^ ,1 Interval L 2 _ ± £ = _ 5 _ £ _

CENTRALIZERS ( C g » N l . J

Source >v <>rvc. vA C ?(lief\<r\ (-c>v Ôa \A Seiup/Hydralion Time JLhc Vol. Fluid AriMrHlO g l. Tremied ( Y /(§)) Z blA^:4<i^

RLTFR PACK T^-^^X. fi"^ ( Type -^jc^v 3 Sc\i'AUl^--Sr\i\vlr^9=U^^ Amt Used ^ 7 - I f;01 h • fr>:i. Tremied ( Y / ^ Source (ZJl-g^-g^'K g Gr. Size Dist. 44

™ fvlC. 6^. ./O niameter 1 Slot Size & Type . ^ ^ f Q Interval BGS ?:> -fo

SUME (<^/N).^ - - y ' Interval BGS fiP-PCS^t. Length Bottom CAP C P N )

Setun/Hydration time ^ Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N )

Borehole dia.

^ra>-^6jcJrUc, copies -lrc> A<ê. laJ^'Zr

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard ^Ptmh'-M^^

WELL NO.: C Q A - 7 Installation:-f^('e-f:3/\£? ^ ^ l ' W i - i U?MT;US'"=:

Project No.:jjqli,-/lZ-1'A-flV/;f\ Client/Project: (l.;-\t>>, Pr-e>ÂO

Contractor: i^^^ Drlg Contractor: P o,. , \,'

Comp. Started: — ^-'"VZ. 5 '.2X^<:?rA Comp. Ended: 1 ' ^ - ^TL. 2-- "ocS* JIT'v'A .

BuiU By: ..€^tL\'(?vVWc\^'AtW-M( Well Coordinates:

Elev. Height GS Height GS Height-Depth BGS

0.00 '

rO l-Elev. Z ^ ^ - 7 g T Depth BGS

iS7^

I

T P : ^ ( ^ ^

PROTECTIVE CSG , / Material/Tvpe " -ng -e-li Diameter .ID " Depth BGS

.Water Tight Seal ( Y / 1


SURFACE PAP r. , -f. ^ \ 1 Composition & Size

RISER PIPE 3 6 Typ

Diameter Total Length (TOC to TOS).

GROUT . , .. -r- , Composition & Proportions IZJ O^-^ O iV f

Tremied {0/ N ) „ Interval iî(o^

CENTRALIZERS; \Quy^) .< . , / . ^ /

Source g-Ji»' • ' . .. s ,»>K '...'S-Hr.ir' K Setup/Hydration Time Vol. Fluid Addp.dlO Tremied ( y/ N )

nLTER PACK -^''^^^'T^f^p-'tL.-f^h^^ T y p e '^.^ • .J j'li '•T' r"^^

Amt Used -^T-|07>lb> h .<7' , ' Tremied (,^/N ) / , ' Source <r T~i Gr. Size Dis t .^t j j^:^:^^^

Type. Diameter. Slot Size & Type ^0(P" y^/^-.^g.•^K\y^•c^_ Interval BGS ^^VA -^li^'A'

SUME (^^/N) , , v f Interval BGS JllhAfl ^ Length ^ T-. Bottom CAP ((^/ N )

Borehole dia.

PACKnLL PLUG ^.ôXz, / .'L 0 / ^ Material —rrtTr (D r/7.f^ Seiup/Hydration lime __! Tremied ( Y / N )

• ' ; ; / A p p e n d i x B-2 Regional Water Level Maps (1972-1992)

PPiyi Gamp Dresser & McKeei

R23C

•to . no •o no t o t t O » 0 f * 0 t i o t t O I T O t a o l«< SOO n o « 0 3 5 0 1 4 0 > 4 0 , , ^ > » 0 J » < i ItO 410 440 410 410

FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

GROUND WATER TABLE

LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (US.G.5J

DECEMBER, 1973

CONTOUR INTERVAL 5'

KEY

rnesNO i.o. WCLLS

rncsNO CITV WELLS MADCRA l.a WCLLS

CONSOLtDATCD LDL WCLLf

JAUtS LO. WCLLS

I INCH "25MILES HomTi DISTRICT BOUNDARY

FRCSHO 1.0. W C L L S

mcsao CUT WILLJ f lAOCRA 10. W C L L S

CONSOLIOkTCO 1.0 W C L L S

J A U C S I.D. W C L L S

I INCH = 2.5 MILES DISTRICT BOUNDARY AREAS EXCLUDED


GROUND WATER TABLE

LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (U.S.G.S.)

DECEMBER 31.1976

CONTOUR INTERVAL S

rRCSNO l.O WELLS

fRCSNO CtTT WCLLS

UAOCRA ID WCLLS

C0N30LI0ATC0 1.0 WCLLS

JAMES I.D WCLLS

SCALE' I INCH -2 SMILES B(w.m DISTRICT BOUNDARY

AREAS EXaUOED

SCALE- I INCH: 2.5 MILES aanm DISTRICT eOUNOMY

If^ 'S AREAS EXCUXJCO

1 J n | i | l | M l n i M « i ' | M M RI7E RIBE R I9E I

1

R20E R2IE R22E

SCALE' I INCH- 2.5 MILES a i B M DISTRICT BOl*«>»Tr

5 H , n i M I 1 If 5 J 5 E 5 S '

R17E RI9E _J R20E_ I RIBE


GROUND WATER TABLE LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (U.S.G.S.)

JANUARY 1988

CONTOUR INTERVAL 5"

m v t t CITV HAKRA ID CCflSOllDAUO IU JAMCI 10 WASIt 1HCAIULIII n.AHI oescnwTiON viri-LS

S C A L E ' I I N C H : 2 .5 MILES

a u n m DISTRICT B O t M M f n r

AREAS EXOJUOCD

H J j i l l f l f RISE R I9E R20E R22E


GROUND WATER TABLE LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION IU.S.G.S.)

JANUARY 1989 CONTOUR INTERVAL S'

WELL KEl

rhCSMO ID O mts io CUT

UACCAA 10 Ul COfiSCXlOAIfO 10

S C A L E - I I N C H : 2 .5 MILES

a u a n DISTRICT BCUNOAm

AREAS EXCUXJCO

R23E

- ; m ' - .[ . *• J- i _ . .

t j

,_ / 1 ... _ ttttS

/ / - 1—

RIBE R22E R23E


GROUND WATER TABLE

I INCH • 2.S MILES

ttuom DISTRICT BOUNOWn

k i ^ ' i S AREAS EXCUXXO

R I 9 E R Z I E R 2 3 e

F R E S N O IRRIGATION DISTRICT

GROUND WATER TABLE

L INES o r E Q U A L E L E V A T I O N ( U S . G . S . :

J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 2

C O N T O U R I N T E R V A L S '

W F ' t K E Y

ricsNO IOL

mSNO e i T T . ^ HIOCM LO. CfVtfOLKMTCD 10. jAhCS l.a

S C A L E - I INCH • 2 .5 MILES

DISTRICT BOuiwAir i r

A R E A S EXCUUOCO

Appendix B-3 Water Level Time Trends

CDM Gamp Dresser & McKee

Well Nest CDM-1

210

206

Si98 (0

194

190

May-92 Aug-92 I

Oct-92 1

Jan-93 1

Mar-93 Jun-93 Date

Aug-93 I

Nov-93 Jan-94 I

Apr-94

A - B - B

wicnew 05/18/94

Well Nest CDM-2

210

206

c o (S 202

LU OJ > 0)

2 198 Co

a 0) 0)

194

190

Apr-92 I

Jul-92 I

Oct-92 I

Jan-93 May-93 Date

Aug-93 I

Nov-93 I

Mar-94 Jun-94

^ A - B - B

wl 05/i

Well Nest CDM-3

210

206

c o 'ts 202 > 0}

LU

>

(0

a>

194

190

Apr-92 1

Jul-92 I

Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93 Date

— I — Aug-93 Nov-93

I Mar-94 Jun-94

-o- A - & B

wicnew 05/19/94

Well Nest CDM-4

210

Apr-92 Jul-92 Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93 Date

Aug-93 Nov-93 Mar-94 Jun-94

-o- A - e - B 0

wl||H 0 5 / ^ ^

Well Nest CDM-5

210

206

O 'c3 202 > 0) UJ

> (0

2 198 to

n

194

O

190 T" 1 1 1 Aug-93 Nov-93 Mar-94

X 1 Apr-92 Jul-92 Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93

Date Jun-94

^ A-B-B ^ C

wicnew 05/18/94

Well CDM-6A

210

206

c o 05 202 >

111

> CD

O

0) 0)

194

190

Apr-92 Jul-92 I

Oct-92 I

Jan-93 May-93 Date

I Aug-93

I Nov-93

I Mar-94 Jun-94

Wicnew 05/18/94

Well Nest CDM-7

210

206

c g

'm 202

LU

^ 1 9 8 (0

O Q

(D O LI.

194

190

Apr-92 I

Jul-92 I

Oct-92 I

Jan-93 May-93 Date

Aug-93 I

Nov-93 I

Mar-94 Jun-94

^ A ^ 0

wicnew 05/18/94

Well Nest UW-1

220

Nov-84 Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90 Date

Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94

^ A B C

Well Nest UW-2

220

S a

1

214

c g 'c3 208 > o LU OJ

>

^202 (0

196

190

Nov-84 Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 Date

May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94

^ A B -AT- C

wicnew 05/19/94

Well Nest DW-1

220

214

c o

208 > LU 03

^ 2 0 2 CO

EB

0) 0)

196

190 1 Mar-86

1 Aug-87

1 1 Dec-88 May-90

Date

— I — Jan-93 Nov-84 Sep-91 Jun-94

^ A B 0

Well Nest DW-2

220

214

c g "ro 208 > o UJ

>

o

•

•

o

^ 2 0 2 (0

0) 0)

196

•

190

Nov-84 I

Mar-86 Aug-87 i I

Dec-88 May-90 Date

Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94

^ A B C

wicnew 05/19/94

Well W-R1

220

o

o

o

o o

o o

o o ^ o

o o

214

g •5 208 > 0) UJ 03 > _J 0}

CO 202

196

190

Nov-84 1

Mar-86 Aug-87 1

Dec-88 May-90 Date

Sep-91 I

Jan-93 Jun-94

Well W2

220

214

o

o

o

0

0

o

g =15 208 > 03

UJ 03 > 03

03 ^ 2 0 2

196

190

Nov-84 T

Mar-86 Aug-87 1

Dec-88 May-90

Date Sep-91

1 Jan-93 Jun-94

Wicnew 05/19/94

Well W3

220

214

O

c g ••^208 > 03

LU 03

> 03 03 ^ 2 0 2

CJD

O

O O O

03 03

o o _ Q .

196

190

O

o

Nov-84 I

Mar-86 Aug-87 I

Dec-88

Date

— \ — May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94

94

Well W4

220

214

g '15 208 > 03 UJ 03 > 03

03 ^ 2 0 2

O

o o

03 03

196

O

O

190 1

Mar-86

1

Jan-93 Nov-84 Aug-87 I 1

Dec-88 May-90

Date Sep-91 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well W5

220

214

O

c g CO 208 I UJ 03 > 03

03 to 202 5

o o

03

- O -" O "

196

190 1 Aug-87

— I — Sep-91 Nov-84

I Mar-86

I I Dec-88 May-90

Date

1 Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well W6

220

214

g 'to 208

UJ 03 > 03

03 To 202

03

_Q_

O

196

190

Nov-84 1

Mar-86 Aug-87 I I

Dec-88 May-90 Date

Sep-91 I

Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well MW-1

220

214

c g 'to 208 >

LU 03 > 03

03 15 202

O O

03 03 LJL

O o

O O

196

190 1 Aug-87

\ Dec-88

1 May-90 Nov-84 Mar-86

Date Sep-91

I Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well MW-2

220

214

_g CO

> 03 LU 03 > 03

03

O O

208 o

O 03 03

U-

^ 2 0 2 O

T J O O O o O o

196

190

Nov-84 I

Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90

Date Sep-91

I Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well MW-3

220

214

c g ••S3 208 > 03

UJ 03 > 03

03

13 202

o o

O

03 03

O o

196

O O

190

Nov-84 Mar-86 I

Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90

Date Sep-91

I Jan-93 Jun-94

Well MW-4

220

214

O O

g is 208 > 03

03 > 03

03 « 2 0 2

C3

03 03 U.

o

196

190 1

Mar-86

1

Aug-87 Nov-84 I

Dec-88

Date May-90

1 Sep-91

I Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Well OW-1

220

214

c g ••5 208

I LU

•5

03 13 202

o

196

190 1 Dec-88 Nov-84

I Mar-86 Aug-87

Date May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94

Wicnew 05/19/94

Well EW-1

220

214

O

g '13 208 > 03 lU "53 > 03

03

13 202

03 03

196

O

190 1

Aug-87

1 1

Dec-88 May-90

Date

— I —

Sep-91 Nov-84 Mar-86 I

Jan-93 Jun-94

wicnew 05/19/94

Appendix B-4 Irrigation Data

CDM Gamp Dresser &. McKee

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TO; Frank Winslow

FROM; Jason Preece

DATE: June 10, 1993

SUBJECT: A g r i c u l t u r a l Land Use and I r r i g a t i o n Practices i n the V i c i n i t y of Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l

INTRODUCTION

In an e f f o r t to characterize the effects of a g r i c u l t u r a l land use on the groundwater regime i n the v i c i n i t y of the Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l (FSL), the following l i m i t e d information i s provided that relates to the use of i r r i g a t i o n water from wells and the Fresno Colony Canal, This information w i l l help determine groundwater pumpage output from the underlying aquifer and i n f i l t r a t i o n factors from i r r i g a t i o n practices.

One of the underlying p r i n c i p l e s guiding assumptions made i n the estimates of groundwater use i s that farmers most often w i l l use canal water to i r r i g a t e crops when available and turn to pumping groundwater from wells when the canal water i s not available. This i s simply because the canal water costs less to use. Occasionally, groundwater i s used to supplement the canal water supply. Therefore, a his t o r y of canal water a v a i l a b i l i t y i s f i r s t presented because of the way canal water supply relates to groundwater pumping. Then, narrative descriptions of i r r i g a t i o n practices and a g r i c u l t u r a l land use for s i g n i f i c a n t land parcels surrounding the l a n d f i l l are given to determine crop water demand and duration of i r r i g a t i o n . This i s then followed by a formulation of pumpage with respect to time for each of the l o c a l i r r i g a t i o n wells.

Some of the missing elements of th i s characterization included the lack of s p e c i f i c knowledge of how generous the area farmers are i n i r r i g a t i n g t h e i r crops and a thorough h i s t o r y of which crops have been c u l t i v a t e d on the parcels where "row crops" are grown. Row crops refer to crops that are commonly rotated between growing seasons, such as vegetables, cotton, alfalfa,and grain crops. Grape vineyards, on the other hand, are stable and have existed for long periods depending on t h e i r maturity. Where as the type of crop grown generally determines the duration and amount of i r r i g a t i n g , the farmer's judgement adds to or negates from the actual amounts.

FRESNO COLONY CANAL OPERATION

The Fresno I r r i g a t i o n D i s t r i c t (FID) owns and operates the Fresno Colony Canal that serves the majority of the area surrounding the l a n d f i l l (See Figure 1, A g r i c u l t u r a l Land Use Map). The canal

TABLE 1

FRESNO COLONY CANAL OPERATIONAL PERIODS

YEAR PRIMARY PERIOD SECONDARY PERIOD

1992 A p r i l 1 to July 15

1991 A p r i l 16 to Aug. 15

1990 March 1 to A p r i l 15 June 1 to Ju l y 31

1989 March 1 to July 31

1988 March 1 to A p r i l 30 May 15 to July 31

1987 March 1 to March 31 May 1 to Ju l y 31

1986 March 1 to Aug. 31


1984 March 1 to Sept. 30

1983 A p r i l 1 to Sept. 3 0

1982 March 1 to Sept. 3 0




1978 March 1 to Oct. 31

1977 June 1 to July 31

1976 May 1 to July 31



1973 March 1 to Sept, 30







1966 March 1 to Ju l y 31

1965 March 1 to Aug.. 31

runs west along the Annadale Road alignment i n an open d i t c h to a location close to monitoring well CDM-1 and i r r i g a t i o n well I I where i t enters a large diameter pipe. At the inter s e c t i o n of Annadale and West Avenue, the canal water emerges from the pipe and turns due south and flows along the east side of West Avenue u n t i l i t turns southwest some 500 feet past North Avenue, An 18-inch diameter pipe carries canal water to the west side of the • l a n d f i l l , FID was contacted to determine the h i s t o r i c a l operation of the canal. Canal operation data i s available back to 1921 but only data back to 1965 i s presented and thought to be s u f f i c i e n t considering the degree of refinement i n t h i s characterization e f f o r t . According to them, water was supplied to the canal over the periods from 1992 back to 1965 as presented i n Table 1, In addition, FID states that the 18-inch diameter pipe i s capable of producing four (4) to s i x (6) cubic feet of water per second when i n f u l l operation.

By far, March 1 i s the t r a d i t i o n a l .startup date for the Fresno Colony Canal, with exceptions noted during low p r e c i p i t a t i o n years i n 1976, 1977, 1983 and 1990 to 1992, Shutdown dates t y p i c a l l y occurred at the end of the months of July, August and September and occasionally water supplied to the end of October which generally marks the end of the i r r i g a t i o n season. Intermediate shutdown periods occurred i n the years of 1987, 1988 and 1990 i n order to maintain water levels i n the D i s t r i c t ' s main water supply. Pine F l a t Reservoir, p r i o r to the majority of the Spring snowpack melt.

IRRIGATION PRACTICES

For the most part, i n the v i c i n i t y of the Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l , grape vineyards l i e i n the northern half and row crops are grown i n the southern half, as well as, out to the West i n the down-gradient groundwater d i r e c t i o n from the l a n d f i l l . S i g n i f i c a n t parcels of land with respect to influence on the contamination plume at the l a n d f i l l are designated on Figure 1, Ag r i c u l t u r a l Land Use Map, Vineyards are designated VI through V4 and row crop f i e l d s are designated Rl through R6 on the map. In addition, s i g n i f i c a n t i r r i g a t i o n wells, designated I I through 17, and the Fresno Colony Canal are shown on the map. Personal knowledge of the f i e l d s , wells and i r r i g a t i o n conduits, gained during RI/FS f i e l d work by way of s i t e reconnaissance and discussions with l o c a l farmers, has been used to determine the following relationships between each i r r i g a t i o n well and the surrounding, served, crop'fields.

I r r i g a t i o n Well I I - I r r i g a t i o n well I I s t r i c t l y serves vineyard VI through underground piping that runs along the east edge of the vineyard. Vineyard VI can be feed by canal water through the same underground piping. No information could be obtained concerning the well's construction. The well pump i s rated at 40 horsepower (Hp) and capable of producing about 1500 gallons per minute (gpm).

I r r i g a t i o n Well 12 - I r r i g a t i o n well 12 s t r i c t l y serves row crop f i e l d R l , During the past two years, strawberries and vegetables have been in t e r m i t t e n t l y grown on R l , State records indicate the well to have been i n s t a l l e d i n 1951 and to be 158 feet deep with 143 feet of casing as compiled by Earth Sciences Associates i n 1988 (Their well designation and the State's well designation i s P-53), The well diameter i s 6 inches and i s l i s t e d for domestic use. I t i s believed that i n more recent times, the w e l l has been used for i r r i g a t i n g . The wells output i s estimated to be between 100 and 200 gpm. F i e l d Rl can not be served by canal water.

I r r i g a t i o n Well 13 - This well i s used to s t r i c t l y serve vineyard V2 through underground piping that runs the length of the eastern edge of the vineyard. Vineyard V2 can also be served from i r r i g a t i o n well 16 or the Fresno Colony Canal v i a an 18-inch diameter pipe that runs under the l a n d f i l l along the Annadale alignment and emerges at 16, However, i r r i g a t i o n w e l l 16 i s pr i m a r i l y used for f i e l d s R2 through R5 when i t s operation i s required. No information has been obtained on the design of i r r i g a t i o n well 13,

I r r i g a t i o n Well 14 - I r r i g a t i o n w e l l 14 i s used to serve vineyard V3 and f i e l d s R2 through R4, Water from th i s w e l l can be used i n conjunction with water from i r r i g a t i o n wells 15 and 16 on a piping network to serve f i e l d s R2 through R5. Vineyard V3 can be served by canal water v i a the same piping network. Well 14 has a 50 Hp pump capable of producing 1600 gpm. The pump i s 5 years old and was l i k e l y preceded by a smaller pump. The we l l depth i s 160 feet and i s l i k e l y open bottom with an estimated casing length of 120 to 130 feet given that casing i s t y p i c a l l y driven to a desired depth and "landed" on a competent clay layer then the well i s d r i l l e d deeper through one or two permeable sand layers.

I r r i g a t i o n Well 15 - I r r i g a t i o n w e l l 15 i s used i n conjunction with wells 14 and 16 to serve f i e l d s R2 through R5. Addi t i o n a l l y , w e l l 15 i s occasionally used to f i l l a ranch water truck for spraying on d i r t roads between the f i e l d s and the dairy ranch west of f i e l d R2. Well 15 has a 30 Hp pump capable of producing an estimated 1000 gpm. No data was obtained on the age and construction of t h i s w e l l .

I r r i g a t i o n Well 16 - Also referred to as well U-16 by Camp Dresser and McKee and others, i r r i g a t i o n well 16 i s used i n conjunction with wells 14 and 15 to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5. When pumping i s required ( i . e . when canal water i s not ava i l a b l e ) , most often a l l three wells are l i k e l y required to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5. However, that may not always -be the case since planting and harvesting of crops throughout the f i e l d s takes place at d i f f e r e n t times and not a l l f i e l d s are always planted. I f an estimate of which wel l i s used most often i s made, w e l l 16 would be that w e l l since i t i s furthest upgradient and at the highest surface elevation. Well 16 has a 40 Hp pump measured at producing an average flow 1566 gpm on

A p r i l 7, 1993, New pump boles were i n s t a l l e d i n the 179 foot deep well i n Spring, 1992, The casing length i s estimated at 150 to 160 feet i n length. Original age of the well i s not know.

I r r i g a t i o n Well 17 - Well 17 has been te n t a t i v e l y i d e n t i f i e d to serve vineyard V4 when canal water i s not supplied. Well 17 i s believed to be a r e l a t i v e l y old well not recognized by some previous investigators. Information should be obtained on t h i s well concerning design and usage hi s t o r y due to i t s proximity to the l a n d f i l l .

ESTIMATES OF GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE

On A p r i l 8, 1993, a discussion with Mr. Joe Souza, who owns and operates i r r i g a t i o n wells I I , 13, 14, 15 and 16 as well as vineyards VI, V2 and V3 and f i e l d s R2 through R5, gave some insight as to the amount of groundwater usage i n the v i c i n i t y of the l a n d f i l l . He stated that i n 1993 he does not expect to need well water since estimates of the snowpack indicate a long canal water season. He said that l a s t year, af t e r July 1, he had to pump his wells (three wells i n network, 14, 15 and 16) i n order to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5, At the time, he was growing a l f a l f a , where as, he w i l l be growing corn i n 1993, He said he rotates between a l f a l f a , corn, hay and sometimes cotton on the four f i e l d s . He had planted hay i n f a l l , 1992 that was ready for harvest i n two weeks. Mr, Souza stated that l a s t year a f t e r the canal water ran out, he had to pump a l l three wells for seven (7) days continuously i n order to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s of a l f a l f a . He said that af t e r the seven days of watering, he would wait seven (7) to ten (10) days before s t a r t i n g the i r r i g a t i o n process over again. The following c a l c u l a t i o n has been made to determine the amount of water required to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s :

Total output rate for three wells 14 @ 1,600 gpm 15 @ 1,000 gpm

-t- 16 @ 1.566 gpm 4,166 gpm

Total volume for seven days 4,166 gpm (Rate X Period) x 10,080 minutes/7 davs

41,993,280 gallons or since,

325,931,4 gallons = one acre-foot

I t appears to take 128.3 acre-feet of water to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s of t o t a l area eg[ual to 242.3 acres for the given 10 to 16 day period i n CTuly for h i s a l f a l f a crop.

I t appears that the a l f a l f a crop requires approximately 6.35 inches (128.3 acre-feet/242,3 acres) of water per 14 to 17 day

watering cycle during t h i s period i n July, This i s equivalent to an average of 0.41 inches per day during peak consumptive use. In order to add v a l i d i t y to Mr. Souza's statement, the following information was derived from research presented i n Orson W. Israelsen and Vaughn E. Hansen's 1962 version of " I r r i g a t i o n P r i n c i p l e s and Practices,"

The region i n which the FSL i s located i n , and i s comparable to (given a mean monthly temperature i n July of 80,9 degrees Fahrenheit and 345 f r o s t - f r e e days per year according to the U,S. Dept, of Commerce, 1980), i s s i m i l a r to Israelsen and Hansen,s Area 3, the Central Valley - C a l i f o r n i a and Valleys East Side of Cascade Mountains as depicted i n t h e i r Figure 11.9 and Table 11,13, Table 11.13, Total Consumptive Use and Peak Daily Use, Western United States for area 3 l i s t s a t o t a l seasonal use of 40,0 inches and a peak d a i l y use 0,30 inches for a l f a l f a . However for Area. 4, Intermountain, Desert, and Western High Plains, the seasonal use i s 52.0 inches and peak d a i l y use i s 0,40 inches.

Comparison of the figures indicates that Mr. Souza appears to apply somewhat more than the average amount of water to his plants for the area he farms i n . For the purposes of pumpage estimates and data extraction from Israelsen and Hansen's table, an average between Areas 3 and 4 w i l l be used. The following consumptive uses for crops grown i n the v i c i n i t y of the FSL are given.

Crop Seasonal Use (inches)

Peak Daily Use (inches)

A l f a l f a 46.0 0,35

Pasture (hay) 42.0 0,35

Corn 26.0 0,35

Cotton 29.0 0.30

Grapes (vineyard) 35,0 0.26

I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g to note that i f the same four f i e l d s were to be i r r i g a t e d with canal water supplied at 4 to 6 cubic feet per second through the 18-inch diameter pipe that runs under the l a n d f i l l , i t would take approximately 10 to 16 days to i r r i g a t e the f i e l d s . This means that during the peak use times (midsummer) the canal water would have to go on continuously and/or may need to be supplemented by well water, p a r t i c u l a r l y since the 18-inch pipe would also need to serve vineyards V2 and V3. The i r r i g a t i o n d i s t r i c t says that the 18-inch pipe use-rating i s 20 days/month.

i r r i g a t i o n well use for each of the s i g n i f i c a n t wells surrounding the l a n d f i l l , the following example i s given for well 16 for the season of 1992:

Use Year 1992

Assumptions for f i e l d s R2 to R5 -

* Watering season March 1 to September 30 or 214 days.

* Canal water supplied from A p r i l 1 to July 15,

* 108-day period of water supply from wells only.

* A l f a l f a crop requires 0.35 inches of water per peak use day and 46.0 inches per season,

* 108 days/214 days x 46 inches = 23.2 inches/season given that the break between canal water and well water occurred at the middle of the season ( i . e . mid-July).

* 1566gpm/4166gpm x 242.3 acres x (23.2 inches/12 inches per foot = 176.2 acre-feet t o t a l share of well water needed from 16 for f i e l d s R2 through R5,

Assumptions for vineyard V2 -

* Watering season March 1 to October 30 or 244 days.

* Canal water supplied from A p r i l 1 to July 15,

* 139-day period of water supply from wells only,

* 0.26 inches of water required per peak use day and 35 inches required per season,

* 139 days/245 days x 35 inches = 19.9 inches/season from well 16.

* 75% of vineyard V2 watering covered by well 13 leaving about 15.4 acres for 16 to cover.

* 15,4 acres x (19.9 inches/12 inches per foot) = 25.5 acre-feet

Total estimated pumpage from 16 for use year 1992 = 176.2 -1-25.5 = 201,7 acre-feet.

Review of the l i s t of service dates for the Fresno Colony Canal indicates that most often canal water i s supplied for the majority of the i r r i g a t i o n season which means that a f r a c t i o n of

the annual consumptive use i s the best parameter for making estimates. This i s because peak d a i l y use only occurs for short periods, l i k e during plant maturity before harvest and during hot, mid-summer days, which t y p i c a l l y occurs during the months of July and August. However, i n the case of use years when canal water was not supplied during portions of July and August, the peak d a i l y use figures are perhaps more representative for the whole of the July/August period dependant on well water. This occurs for use years 1987 through 1992, 1977, 1976, 1972, 1968 and 1966, The following correction would then be made to the t o t a l estimated pumpage for wel l 13's 1992 use year.

Fields R2 through R5 -

108 - 46 days = 61 days @ annual use rate

and, 46 days @ peak d a i l y use rate,

62 days/214 days x 46,0 inches = 13,3 inches 46 days x 0,35 inches per day = 16,1 inches

For a t o t a l of 29,4 inches

Substitution i n the above equation y i e l d s a t o t a l of 223,1 acre-feet for 16's share of the three f i e l d s .

Vineyard V2 -

93 days/245 days x 35,0 inches = 13.3 inches 46 days x 0,26 inches per day = 12,0 inches

For a t o t a l of 25,1 inches

Substitution i n the appropriate equation above y i e l d s a t o t a l of 32,2 acre feet.

Total estimated pumpage for well 16 would then be 255.3 acre-feet.

I t i s recognized that many factors contribute to the amount of i r r i g a t i o n any one farmer-may do. Crop demand and weather are the biggest determinants, which i s why the above methodology has been chosen and l i k e l y gives good estimates. Other factors that contribute to s p e c i f i c i r r i g a t i o n practices include economics, water a v a i l a b i l i t y , s o i l conditions and i r r i g a t i o n methods, to name just a few. Some of these factors have been taken into consideration i n the figures presented from Israelsen and Hansen, Other factors have been ignored and are not considered s i g n i f i c a n t or could be considered to negate each other. Estimates for i r r i g a t i o n wells I I , and 13 through.16 are given i n Tables 2 through 6, respectively, along with important assumed parameters. I r r i g a t i o n wells 12 and 17 are omitted due to uncertainty i n t h e i r operations.

IRRIGATION WELL 11

YEAR ESTIMATED DAILY

PUMPAGE

PUMP DAYS @ SEASONAL

USE RATE

(FT3/DAY) (GPM) (DAYS)

1965 62229 323.2 61

1966 62229 323.2 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 62229 323.2 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 62229 323.2 61

1971 62229 323.2 30

Average of Above 44449 230.9 39.1

1972 62229 323.2 61

1973 62229 323.2 30

1974 62229 323.2 30

1975 62229 323.2 30


1976 62229 323.2 122

1977 62229 323.2 153


1978 0 0.0 0

1979 62229 323.2 30

1980 62229 323.2 30

1981 62229 323.2 61

1982 62229 323.2 30 1983 62229 323.2 62 1984 62229 323.2 30 1985 62229 323.2 61 1986 62229 323.2 61


1987 62229 323.2 91 1988 62229 323.2 76 1989 62229 323.2 60 1990 62229 323.2 107 1991 62229 323.2 107 1992 62229 323.2 93


IRRIGATION WELL 13

YEAR ESTIMATED DAILY

PUMPAGE (FT3/DAY) (GPM)

PUMP DAYS @ SEASONAL

USE RATE

1965 39844 207.0 61

1966 39844 207.0 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 39844 207.0 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 39844 207.0 61

1971 39844 207.0 30


1972 39844 207.0 61

1973 39844 207.0 30

1974 39844 207.0 30

1975 39844 207.0 30


1976 39844 207.0 122

1977 39844 207.0 153


1978 0 0.0 0

1979 39844 207.0 30

1980 39844 207.0 30

1981 39844 207.0 61

1982 39844 207.0 30

1983 39844 207.0 62

1984 39844 207.0 30

1985 39844 207.0 61

1986 39844 207.0 61


1987 39844 207.0 91 1988 39844 207.0 76

1989 39844 207.0 60 1990 39844 207.0 107 1991 39844 207.0 107 1992 39844 207.0 93


IRRIGATION WELL 14

YEAR

TOTAL

ESTIMATED

DAILY

PUMPAGE

(FT3/DAY) (GPM)

PUMP DAYS

@ SEASONAL

USE RATE

1965 119674 621.6 61

1966 77607 403.1 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 130191 676.3 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 77607 403.1 61

1971 9248 48.0 30


1972 130191 676.3 61

1973 9248 48.0 30

1974 9248 48.0 30

1975 9248 48.0 30


1976 130191 676.3 122

1977 119674 621.6 153


1978 0 0.0 0

1979 9248 48.0 30

1980 9248 48.0 30

1981 119674 621.6 61

1982 9248 48.0 30

1983 85495 444.1 62

1984 9248 48.0 30

1985 119674 621.6 61

1986 77607 403.1 61


1987 85495 444.1 91

1988 130191 676.3 76 1989 119674 621.6 60 1990 77607 403.1 107 1991 85495 444.1 107 1992 130191 676.3 93


IRRIGATION WELL 15

YEAR ESTIMATED

DAILY

PUMPAGE

PUMP DAYS

@ SEASONAL

USE RATE

(FT3/DAY) (GPM)

1965 60747 316 31

1966 37605 195 31

1967 0 0 0

1968 66532 346 31

1969 0 0 0

1970 37605 195 31

1971 0 0 0


1972 66532 346 31

1973 0 0 0

1974 0 0 0

1975 0 0 0


1976 66532 346 92

1977 60747 316 123


1978 0 0 0

1979 0 0 0

1980 0 0 0

1981 60747 316 31

1982 0 0 0

1983 41944 218 32

1984 0 0 0

1985 60747 316 31

1986 37605 195 31


1987 41944 218 66

1988 66532 346 46

1989 60747 316 31 1990 37605 195 77 1991 41944 218 77 1992 66532 346 63


IRRIGATION WELL 16

YEAR TOTAL 16

PUMPAGE (FT3/DAY) GPM

TOTAL DAYS PUMPAGE

1965 121452 630.9 61

1966 80244 416.8 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 131754 684.4 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 80244 416.8 61

1971 13281 69.0 30


1972 131754 684.4 61

1973 13281 69,0 30

1974 13281 69.0 30

1975 13281 69.0 30


1976 131754 684.4 122

1977 121452 630.9 153


1978 0 0.0 0

1979 13281 69.0 30

1980 13281 69.0 30

1981 121452 630.9 61

1982 13281 69.0 30

1983 87971 457.0 62

1984 13281 69.0 30

1985 121452 630.9 61

1986 80244 416.8 61

Average of Above 51583 267.9 40.6 •

1987 87971 457.0 91

1988 131754 684.4 76

1989 121452 630.9 60 1990 80244 416.8 107 1991 87971 457.0 107 1992 131754 684.4 93


IRRIGATION WELL II

USE YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATE ESTIMATEI

IRRIGATION S E A S O N A L WATER @ SEASONA SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY

DAYS U S E RATE USE USE RATE BY PUMP P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E

(INCHES) (INCHES) (DAYS) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)

1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0 0

1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0 0

1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 72.0 174 7591886 62229

1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 72.0 219 9520971 62229

1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0

1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58,3 62 72.0 89 3858171 62229

1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229

1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1986 24S G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229

1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 72.0 130 5662800 62229

1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 72.0 109 4729371 62229

1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 72.0 86 3733714 62229

1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 72.0 153 6658457 62229

1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 72.0 153 6658457 62229

1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 72.0 133 5787257 62229

AVERAGE 81.6 3553696

IRRIGATION WELL 13

YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY P U M P DAYS A R E A ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATE

IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L S E R V E D YEARLY YEARLY DAILY D A Y S U S E RATE U S E U S E RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E

(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)

1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46.1 0.0 0 0 1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46.1 0,0 0 0 1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 46.1 111.6 4860916 39844

1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 46,1 139.9 6096066 39844

1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46,1 0.0 0 0

1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844

1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 11953Q7 39844 1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 46.1 56.7 2470301 39844 1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844

1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844

1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844

1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 46.1 83.2 3625765 39844

1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 46.1 69.5 3028111 39844

1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 46.1 54.9 2390614 39844

1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 46.1 97.9 4263262 39844

1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 46.1 97.9 4263262 39844

1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 46.1 85.1 3705452 39844

AVERAGE 52.2 2275353

IRRIGATION WELL 14

VINEYARD V3

IRRIGATION WELL 14

YEAR TOTAL C R O P CROP YEARLY PUMP DAYS A R E A ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATI

IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY

DAYS USE RATE USE USE RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E PUMPAG

(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DA'

1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0

1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0

1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 10.7 25.9 1128239 9248

1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 10.7 32.5 1414922 9248

1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0

1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 10.7 13.2 573367 9248

1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248

1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248

1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 10.7 19.3 841555 9248

1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 10.7 16.1 702837 9248

1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 10.7 12.7 554871 9248

1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 10.7 22.7 989521 9248

1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 10.7 22.7 989521 9248

1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 10.7 19.7 860051 9248

IRRIGATION WELL 14

38.4% OF FIELDS R2 THROUGH R5 YEAR TOTAL CROP CROP YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATE

IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY

DAYS USE RATE USE USE RATE BY PUMP PUMPAGE P U M P A G E PUMPAG

(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY

1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427

1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359

1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 93.0 86.1 3749247 120943

1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359

1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 93.0 86.1 3749247 120943

1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 93.0 255.4 11126798 120943

1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 93.0 311.8 13582476 110427

1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93,0 0.0 0 0

1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427

1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 93.0 56.0 2439903 76247

1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 93.0 0.0 0 0

1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427

1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359

1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 93.0 115.5 5032300 76247

1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 93.0 127.7 5563399 120943

1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427

1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 93.0 120.8 5263670 68359

1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 93.0 134.8 5871016 76247

1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 93.0 174.9 7619438 120943

IRRIGATION WELL 14

TOTAL

YEAR ESTIMATED PUMP DAYS

DAILY @ SEASONAL

P U M P A G E USE RATE

(FT3/DAY) (GPM)

1965 119674 621.6 61

1966 77607 403.1 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 130191 676.3 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 77607 403.1 61

1971 9248 48.0 30

1972 130191 676.3 61

1973 9248 48.0 30

1974 9248 48.0 30

1975 9248 48.0 30

1976 130191 676.3 122

1977 119674 621.6 153

1978 0 0.0 0

1979 9248 48.0 30

1980 9248 48.0 30

1981 119674 621.6 61

1982 9248 48.0 30

1983 85495 444.1 62

1984 9248 48.0 30

1985 119674 621.6 61

1986 77607 403.1 61

1987 85495 444.1 91

1988 130191 676.3 76

1989 119674 621.6 60

1990 77607 403.1 107

1991 85495 444.1 107

1992 130191 676.3 93

IRRIGATION WELL 15

24% OF FIELDS R2 - R5

YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED

IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ SEASONAL SERVED YEARLY YEARLY DAILY

D A Y S USE RATE U S E USE RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E

(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)

1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747

1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605

1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 51.2 47.3 2062489 66532

1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605

1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 51.2 47.3 2062489 66532

1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 51.2 140.5 6120935 66532

1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 51.2 171.5 7471822 60747

1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747

1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 51.2 30.8 1342209 41944

1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 51.2 0.0 0 0

1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747

1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605

1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 51.2 63.6 2768306 41944

1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 51.2 70.3 3060468 66532

1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747

1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 51.2 66.5 2895584 37605

1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 51.2 74.1 3229690 41944

1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 51.2 96.2 4191510 66532

IRRIGATION WELL 16

IRRIGATION WELL 16

25% OF VINEYARD V2

YEAR TOTAL CROP CROP

IRRIGATION SEASONAL

DAYS USE RATE

(INCHES)

YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED

WATER ©SEASONAL SERVED YEARLY YEARLY DAILY

USE USE RATE BY PUMP PUMPAGE PUMPAGE PUMPAGE

(INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)

1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0

1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0

1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 • 398444 13281

1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 15.4 37.2 1620340 13281

1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 15.4 46.6 2032066 13281

1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0

1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58,3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 15.4 18.9 823452 13281

1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281

1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281

1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 15.4 27.7 1208615 13281

1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 15.4 23.2 1009392 13281

1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 15.4 18.3 796889 13281

1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 15.4 32.6 1421118 13281

1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 15.4 32.6 1421118 13281

1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 15.4 28.4 1235178 13281

IRRIGATION WELL 16

USE YEAR

37.6% OF FIELDS R2 THROUGH R5

TOTAL

IRRIGATION

DAYS

CROP CROP

SEASONAL

USE RATE

(INCHES)

YEARLY

WATER

USE

(INCHES)

PUMP DAYS AREA

@ SEASONAL SERVED

USE RATE BY PUMP

(ACRES)

ESTIMATED

YEARLY

PUMPAGE

(ACRE-FEET)

ESTIMATED

YEARLY

PUMPAGE

(FT3)

ESTIMATED

DAILY

PUMPAGE

(FT3/DAY)

1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171

1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963

1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 91.1 . 84.3 3672650 118473

1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963

1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 91.1 84.3 3672650 118473

1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 91.1 250,2 10899476 118473

1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 91.1 305.4 13304985 108171

1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171

1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 91.1 54.9 2390055 74689

1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 91.1 0.0 0 0

1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171

1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963

1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 91.1 113.2 4929489 74689

1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 91.1 125.1 5449738 118473

1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171

1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 91.1 118.4 5156132 66963

1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 91.1 132.0 5751071 74689

1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 91.1 171.3 7463772 118473

IRRIGATION WELL 16

YEAR TOTAL 16 TOTAL DAYS

P U M P A G E PUMPAGE

(FT3/DAY) G P M

1965 121452 630.9 61

1966 80244 416.8 61

1967 0 0.0 0

1968 131754 684.4 61

1969 0 0.0 0

1970 80244 416.8 61

1971 13281 69.0 30

1972 131754 684.4 61

1973 13281 69.0 30

1974 13281 69.0 30

1975 13281 69.0 30

1976 131754 684.4 122

1977 121452 630.9 153

1978 0 0.0 0

1979 13281 69.0 30

1980 13281 69.0 30

1981 121452 630.9 61

1982 13281 69.0 30

1983 87971 457.0 62

1984 13281 69.0 30

1985 121452 630.9 61

1986 80244 416.8 61

1987 87971 457.0 91

1988 131754 684.4 76

1989 121452 630.9 60

1990 80244 416.8 107

1991 87971 457.0 107

1992 131754 684.4 93

- 0

,;,._

·. --.· .. ··~

" ..... ) • : !.. ·~ ' '

"

" h • (·,

~~': ~ .. . '-'·

' ... · ':...:.: • •• ~· J ..

.., •_. ' -

·, •''.,..·

.. ,,.

··" ·.

.,, .

--·.··

._:' '--' '

'·

•\'. '., ·,•'

~ .; 1 ' ~ ·,.

•• c \,,

. ··-·

1 ~ J;•, • 'v,' .. i',

' . '~ . ·'"','····.···'

;_

'•' · ... _

• ~ j >

. ~ •;

c, '

) ~ '

'1'' .•• ·-·-: : ..

• ~ , \ ,' ~ I' ,. , ; '>

· . .-· ··. ~ ·,

. '~ .. "

' :-.~- <

... · /· ~--.,, .

'' e; •,_' (,,' r\.• ,...1

,···.·· . \,_ ···,' ·,

,.

'' ',,

,'' .. , ..

. ·' . . : ·.~ (

·.,

:'

•'

'.:.: ~- -1'. \ .. ' '~ ' .. '' ~' . ' ... ' ·:..... '' ' .... ' :..!·,~ • J ~ ;~ ·,., .~,,_,.·~.:·· ',; ' •,', • •• ( / ." ••• : ( > • ~.: ;; '' ••

'' ;'. ~, ~ '> •• -c~' ' ;_:. '7 '• •

. '"/ ' . ~ ./ ; ·: ~. . 'l ~1 ~ ,, • ·' ~ • "" ' ~ ! 1

r·• '_!

.. ·.

' ... '· , ..

. . ·, <l· tl. · .... ' ' , • 'r, ,• .. : . ~ '·. '/ ;..- ' .

. ,r ••

. ~ . '

.... , .'·,., .. '

'< ~.:.. '

' -~..: .... ' '·

' .,

. ''...'·. r . . .. -. . ~ ~ . ;: .:-,. ·.._,· .... \

... ~.~---~~-._,~ '••'

JlJN-2a-i993 16:55 FROM FRESt D SOLID UPSTE DIU. TO 4881015 P,03 juii ^ o . » 0 INO .UU» K.03

PPPl fRCSNO

R W Q C B 3614 E . Adhlan rreano. Calitorriia S TZC Atcns Betty Vo«

Ctiniple I.D. Nd: Leachate >'ai>-I.

APPL Sample Nu: R14 7H*<»;!jeOM

General .Min-ral Analvfl s

Total Alkalinity.

Hydroxide (OH) tngCaCUj/i. CflirbonoLe (COj) •mgCaCO-j/|j Bicarbonate (HCO,) mcjC'flCOi/lj Huoride (F) mg/L Chloride (Cl) mg/L Phosphate (PO^-P) mg/L .Sul£J»te (SO4) mg/L Total Hardness, ad m^Caco^/L Calcium (Ca) mg/L Copper (Cu) /ij/L iron (Fe) fis/i> PotP»t»lvwn (K) mg/T. Kd^lltttsiuin (H$) my/L Manganese (Mn) ^y/L Sodium (KA) uig/1. Zinc (Sn) n^/h pll 9 20. CC .*?patci£ic Conduce ivity

(fiC) fimlios/cin e- 2i*C

Residue, Total f i l t e r a b l e CJ-DS) «iy/L

Methylene Blue Active .SiibfitancOA (MBA5$) iiiC|/L

SjimplB Dntft; 06/04/93 Report Dace: 06/24/si.')

Page 2 of 8

DATC ktfcejvedi 06/07/93

Qiianriffttior) Method kPfiDi r.f. iLumber

2 EnA : » i o . 1 <? X 310.1 «2 2 ErA 310.1

cee EPA 310.1 ( 0.1 EPA 340.2

yo EPA 300.0 0 2 . 0 22.5 BPA 3!)3.2 <12.5 12..s EPA 300.0

ISOO 1 BPA 200,7 160 O.OS SPA 200.7

20.7 SPA 200.7 12700 50 EPA 200.7

1070 50 SPA aoo.i 2U 0.05 EVA ail EPA 200.7 42< O.OS EPA iOO.7 $&4 ro RPA 200.7

H. 2 SPA i.«;o. 1

«. KPA 120.1

55>PO BPA 1C9.1

Z . IC 0.02 BPA 425,1

Checked bv ^ J ^ . - Z "^gST 7^

JUN-28-1993 16:55 FRCM FRESNO SOLID WASTE DIU. TO 4881015 P.04 . . . . . . . 4.vr.>'w 'd. s> ...l\U . yjiJO r .<JH

eG'SS-OS lp-iS7 004

R W Q C B 3614 E. Ashlan Frteno, C a l i f o r n i a S372^ Attr>: Betty Yew

Samplo r . D . NOJ L«etchac« PSL-L

APPL aample No: Rl4J>7e-923B0M

MoH»o<1 ft01 IHalogarbous) Rpaulln!

SampJ<'. ivato: 06/04/93 Kftporl Date:'0f/J4/93

Page 3 of 9

bate KeCGivcd: UG/ov/js

Datt! Extracted! 06/05/93

Dromobenzene Bxvjiiudichlocomftt.hnrif' Bromoform Dromomf#.th«ne Carbon tetrachloridp. Chlorotoenr.enc! Chloroethane Chloroform ChloroiTOthar>e Dibromc>t'hloromethana Dibromomethane 1 /S'Dichiorobeni.enf' 1.3- DiChlorobenzene 1.4- Dichlorobenxeufc nichlorodit luoromftr,h«no 1.1- 01chloroochon* 1,2 Diehioroechnnp 1,J-Wi chloroechene cia-1,2•Dichloroethene trans*I, 2-Dichlu£uwi li ne 1.2- Dichloropropane ci«-l,3-Dichlotop:op«jm trans-1,3-Dich]orcpropone Methylene chloriue" 1,1)2,2 -Ttttrachl c»*oei huua 1,1,l,2.Tetrachlyroethane Tet raehloi oethtru 1,1,I'T*ichloroethane 1,1,2•Triehlorootha«e Trichloroethene Trichlorof]uoromethttne Vinyl r.hlorJdc • NP » None Detected

e'07icentrat:i<yn ND* M ' ND ND NT ND NO ND ND Nt) ND ND Nn • ND til? NO ND ND ND ND

ND Nl> ND ND ND

NU KD KD ND 1^

Tested by

Checked by

L L Qt'JLi? r.r i on l i n ^ ^ . JK i /1 < 0 .5

0.

0, 0, 0,5 O.S. O.S 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 O.S 1.0

0.5 O.S O.S O.b 0 .5 O.S O.D S.O 0.!> 0 ,5 O.D O.S 0 .5 0 ,5 0 . 5 o.:»

JLN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UASTE DIU. TO 4881015 P,05

oes

R W Q C B 3614 E, AciHlAn Freano, California 93726 Attn; Botty Yee

••Sample Date: 06/01/93 Report Date: 06/24/93

Page 4 o£ 8

•Date Receiv(»d; 05/07/ 3

L>ate Extracted: OR/14/93

Sample i.D. No; Lcachstte ML.L

APPL Sample No: imtJt'*f?.H60^

fiaoiEojinfi Dei.feCLiAon limit- oan.

Benzene Chlorobenzene 1 / 2 'Dichlorobenstenff I,3-Dichloroben2ene 1,4 -DJ Chlorobenzene Krhyl beneenc Toluene Xylenes

ND» ND ND ND ND 0.9 0.7 3.)

0.5 0.5 0,5 O.S O.S O.T;

• ND - None Detected

Tested By_

Checked By

JUN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UASTE DIU. TO

06/25/ 3 16:b« fiPPl r/KISKO

4881015 P.06

K W Q C B 3614 K. Aehlnn Fresno. California 5 3726 Attn: Betty Yoc

sample I .D. No; f/eacliai.e PSL-L

APPI. Sample No: R1457B-9V.300M

Sample Date; 06/04/93 Report Date: 06/24/93

ray»# b Of 0

iJace Reteivcd; V^/07/S3

Date Extract.ocJ: 06/uy/93

MgLhod €25 Rflg-uitB .(BfXMe Neutral and-J^yids).!

ft?jjd Cffpdf? 2,4, 6'TrichJorophen(^l ND< 4-Chloro-3•methylphenol ND 2-Chlorcphenol ND 2,4'Dichlorophwnol ND 2,4-DimeI.hy3phriuo) ND 2-Nitrophenol ND 4'NitrophenDi ND 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 4, fi-Dinitro-Z-iiiethyiphisno) ND ?.• Methyl phehol ND 4'Methylph«nol ND pentachlorophenol ND I hcnol ND Benzoic Rcld ND

s;pncciU^tion. u,^/h ND

Daae/Ngutral Ctnpda Acenaphthene 1,2,4 ' T r i c l i l ovobenK^nC' )<n> Kexachiorobcn',iene ND llBXachloroet^tanc av Bio-{2-chloroethyl)ether ND 2-Chlororiaphthalenft Mi 1,2-oichlorubenzetie MD 1,3 -Pi chlorobon»eine MP 1,4-Dichlor9buiiz«nB ND 3,3''Diehlorobt^nzldine ITO 2,4«Dlnitrotoluene Nij 2,6'DiniCr9tvlu«ne ND riuoranthcne ND 4 • Chlorophenylpheny) <».ther ND 4 • »romophenylpJi*?iiy) cthvt INTJ PiB- (2-chlo4oii»opropy) J<(i.hei- ND tils- (2• L'hlOiuu.UioxyJmeLliaiiH KD hexachlorobutadiene ND

5.0 10.0

5.0 5.0 5.0 S.O

30.0 10.0 10.0

5.0 S.O

10.0 5.0 S.O

5.0 5.0 ' j . O S.O 5.0 5.0 5 5 5

10

.0

.0 ,0

S.O S.O 5.0 S.O •j . 0

S.O S.O 5,0

JLN-28-1993 16:56. FROM FRESNO SOLID UflSTE DIU. TO

eje/? - ? lf-:K' '^'^ l-Kf!=S<IO

4881015 P.07

R W Q C B 3614 H, Ashlan Fresno, California 93726 Attn: Beuy Yee

sample Date: 0e/04/93 Hcport Date: 05/24/9.

Pagft 6 o£ 8

Sample I.D. No: Leachar.c rSL-L Date Recciv«rt; 06/07/93

APPL Sample No: Ri4576.923eOM Date Extracted: OS/OS/S.'i

Method feas Heculr.q lBaoc-- Ng»_t_t,c»T a>?d Adda) :

a t-ge/N mifll ,.Cmiid£ Concent lut-inii UO/L Itomv.t.ion Ljmij, iw/h Hftxachlorocyclopent ftdl t''nv Isophorone Naphthalene 2-Methyl naphthalene Nitroben?.caii; N-Nitrooodiphenylaminft N'Nitroaodi-n-propyl.nmi ne N-Nitrooodimethylaiiiine BlP- (?.-ethyJhexyl)phthalate Outylbcnzylphthalate Di-n-butylphthalate Di-n-octylphthaltttft Diethylphthalate DimethylphthalatR Denzo(a)anthracene benzu(a)pyrp.na DcnsoCk)fluoranthene Denao(b)fluoranthene Benzyl alcohol Chryacne Acenaphthylene Anthraceno Renxo{g,h, 1 )pci,-yienfc riuorenn Phenanthrene Dibenn la,h)anthracerit.-Dlben&ofuran Indcno(1,2.3•cd > pyt cn« Pyr«#rie Dieldrin 4,4'-DDR ^,4'»DDD 4,4'-DDT bndrin RncSrin aldehyde

DPI ect ion i, NT; 'j.O 13.4 5.0 ND S.O ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND U.O ND 5.0 ND .S.O ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND 5.0 Wi 5.0 NT> 5.0 ND i .o ND 5.0 ND £-.0 ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND S.O ND 5.0 NO 5.0 ND S.O NU :,o KD 5.0 ND .S.O ND S.O Nl'; 5.0 ND 5.0 ND ?).0 ND 3.0 ND 1.0 ND 1 .0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND 3.0

JUN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UflSTH DIU. TO 4881015 P.08

©08

R M Q C & 3614 E, A.<ih]an Fresno, CaJifornia 93726 Attn; Bonty Yee

Sample i.D. No: Leachate PSL-L

APPL Sample No; ni4S78-y2300M

Sample Cptes 06/04/93 Kcport Date: 06/24/93

Paye 7 of 0

Date kftceivcd: 06/07/93

Date Kxr.rartcd: O6/09/93

Base/Noutral Cmpds Toxaphene a-BHC C-BHC •DtlC Lindane Endosulfan Z Kndosulfan JI Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxitle. Aldrin

(Bft>6,-Nc-.vtial and AolOijJj^

<;0Q££!2U,j\t.ipjLJlEZl; £ ND 50 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND a .0 Nt; 1,0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 NT) i.o ND 1,0

• ND s None Detected

Tested By

Checked By

JUN-2&-1993 16:57 FROM FRESNO SOLID UPSTE DIU. TO 4881015 P. 09

R W Q C B 3614 K. Afthlnn Fresno, Califotnii* 93726 Attn: Betty Vee

.( ample I .D. Nu: Lttacliaie PSL-L

APPL sample N0( R1457e'92380M

Sample DaL*t: 06/04/93 Report Drtte: 06/24/93

Prtye fl of f»

Dot« RuctiivwJ: 06/07/S3

Date hixtractctJ: OG/09/9.'I

Method C25 Reoult.-^ fPaee NtLUtrol Bnrt Agirtfll :

Tentative] V Ident i f ied and Ouarn;-I f ied gL.;<.|,(-;undfl :

Scan H 47 13 /iy/L Scon # 53 02 ftg/h scan « 66 30 ns/l. 4-Hydtoxy-4-methyI-2 p -ntanoiie 56 >'lj/h Scan M 149 4J ;ig/L Scan « 156 30 ^g/L Scan # 211 2b no/L Scan ^ 247 21 /ly/L Scan ff 295 IV /;g/L Scan # 325 94 /ig/L Camphor 29 ;tg/I. Scan (t 339 25 ftg/L . can # 370 29 >ig/L Scan It 360 24 fig/L ,<;can « 406 4 4 /ig/L Scan H 422 36 /ig/L scan « 443 32 u<f/h Scan ft 479 100 ,.g/L Scan <l 738 40 ng/L Pentadecanoif acid 63 pf»/L Scan # 823 S3 fir^/i, yean •( 941 40 ^3/L

TTC'o are calculated uji a i: . i iesponse racror vo Ditf ric«iw.»*t. ini ex rial otandard.

C O A S T • T O -

COAST

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES

Air, Water tc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis & Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories

San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida,CA • Camarillo,CA • San Jose, CA Ai«heim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indiaiapolis, IN

SoCal Div i s ion (Camarillo laboratory) (805) 389-1353 4765 Ca l l s Quetzal, Camarillo, C a l i f o m i a 93012 FAX (805)389-1438

CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. Qie Walnut Creek Center Walnut Creek, CA 94596

lab ISjiriber Project

Analyzed Analyzed by tfethod

CJ-0622-25

2416-112- IM-GRND/GW

03/15/93

DS

EPA 8240

REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of 3

SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN MMKDC SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DKTE RECEIVED

LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH 7\queous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93

OONSTnUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE

/ i g /L /.tg/L

1,1 -Dich lo roe t± iane (75343) 0.5 ND

1 ,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) (107062) 0.5 ND

1 ,1-Dichloroethene (75354) 1. ND

t r ans -1 ,2 -Dich lo roe thene (156605) 1. ND

1 ,2-Dichlorcprcpane (78875) 0.5 ND

c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l c r c p r c p e n e (10061015) 0.5 ND

t r ans -1,3 -Dic i i lorcprcpene (10061026) 0.5 ND

Ethylbenzene (100411) 0.5 ND

2-Hexancne (591786) 5. ND

Methylene C h l o r i d e (75092) 1. ND

4-Miethyi"2-Pentanane (MIBK) (108101) 5. ND

Styrene (100425) 0.5 ND 1 ,1 ,2 ,2 -Tetrachlortaethane (79345) 0.5 ND Tet rachloroethene (PCE) (127184) 0.5 ND l , l , l - T r i c h l o r o e t ± a n e (TCA) (71556) 0.5 ND 1 ,1 ,2 -Tr ich lo roe thane (79005) 0.5 ND Tr ic ihloroethene (TCE) (79016) 0.5 ND T r i c h l o r o f l u o r c T E t h a n e (F-11) (75694) 1. ND Toluene (108883) 0.5 ND V i n y l Ace ta te (108054) 3 . ND

Camarillo lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; L.A.Co.CSD #10184

•RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practiced Qaantitation Limi

03/19/93

MSD7/AJ778

MH/mjw/das/nz

SJ07642074V

COAST - TO -COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Air, Water tc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis tc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology tc Bioassay Laboratories

San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San lose, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN

SoCal Divisicn (Camarillo laboratory) (805) 389-1353 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012 FAX (805)389-1438

CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. Qie Walnut Creek Center Walnut Creek, CA 94596

lab Number Project

Analyzed Analyzed by Method

CJ-0622-25 2416-112 - IM-GRND/GW

03/15/93 DS EPA 8240


SAMPLE DESCRIPTICN MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED

LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jascn Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93

OONSTITOENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /xg/L ng/h

Vinyl Chloride (75014) 1. ND Xylenes, Total 0.5 ND l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surrogate Percent Recovery) (107062) 91. Toluene-d8 (Surrogate Percent Recovery) 94. p-Brcmofluorobenzene (Surrogate Percent Recovery) 80.

Camarillo lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; L.A.Co.CSD #10184 •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitiation Limit)

03/19/93 MSD7/AJ778 MH/mjw/das/nz SJ07642074V

Respectfully submitted, OQAST-TO-CQAST AlC^YTICAL SERVICES, INC.

Ifery Havlicek, Ph.D. President

COAST, TO-COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology tc Bioassay Laboratories

San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Golela, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN

SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, California 93012

(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438

CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300

Lab Nuniber : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW

Analyzed 03/15/93 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Analyzed by: RD

Method : EPA 8270


SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED

LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93

CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L fjg/L

SVOA PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 1,2 Acenaphthylene (208968) 10. ND Acenaphthene (83329) 10. ND Anthracene (120127) 10. ND Benzidine (92875) 30. ND Benzo(a)anthracene (56553) 10. ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205992) 10. ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207089) 10. ND Benzo(a)pyrene (50328) 10. ND Benzo(ghi)perylene (191242) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111911) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (111444) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroisopropyI)ether (39638329) 30. ND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (117817) 100. ND 4-BroniDphenylphenylether (101553) 10. ND ButyIbenzyIphthalate (85687) 20. ND 2-Chloronaphthalene (91587) 20. ND 4-Chlorophenylphenylether (7005723) 10. ND

Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; •RESULTS listed as 'ND* were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limi (1) Sample Preparation on 03/11/93 by MM using EPA 3550 (2) Acid surrogates are spiked at 200ppb; base/neutral surrogates are spiked at lOOppb.

04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/mem/mjd CJ05761075B

COAST - TO• COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysts Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology St Bioassay Laboratories

San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN


(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438

CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Lab Number Project

CJ-0622-25 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW

Analyzed : 03/15/93 Analyzed by: RD Method : EPA 8270


SAMPLE DESCRIPTIOI MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED


CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE f j g / L

Chrysene (218019) 10, ND Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (53703) 20. ND Di-n-butylphthalate (84742) 10. ND 1,2-D ichlorobenzene (95501) 20. ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541731) 20. ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (106467) 20. ND 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine (91941) 30. ND Diethylphthalate (84662) 30. ND Dimethylphthalate (131113) 40. ND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (121142) 10. ND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (606202) 20. ND Di-n-octylphthalate (117840) 10. ND Fluoranthene (206440) 20. ND Fluorene (86737) 10. ND Hexachlorobenzene (118741) 10. ND Hexachlorobutadiene (87683) 40, ND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77474) 100. ND Hexachloroethane (67721) 30. ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (193395) 20. ND Isophorone (78591) 10. ND

Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 S #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; L.A. •RESULTS listed as "ND" were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit)


COAST - TO -COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories

San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN

SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012

(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438

CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300

Lab Number Project

Analyzed

CJ-0622-25 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW

03/15/93 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Analyzed by: RD

Method : EPA 8270




CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L /ig/L

Naphthalene (91203) 20. ND Nitrobenzene (98953) 20. ND N-Nitrosodimethylamine (62759) 10. ND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (86306) 30. ND N-Nitroso di-n-propylamine (621647) 20. ND Phenanthrene (85018) 10. ND Pyrene (129000) 20. ND Trichlorobenzene (108703) 20. ND Aldrin (309002) 5. ND alpha BHC (319846) 10. ND beta BHC (319857) 5. ND delta-BHC (319868) 20. ND ganma BHC (Lindane) (58899) 30. ND p,p'-DDD (72548) 30. ND p,p'-DDE (72559) 10. ND p,p'-DDT (50293) 10. ND Dieldrin (60571) 10. ND Endosulfan I (959988) 20. ND Endosulfan I I (33213659) 20. ND Endosulfan Sulfate (1031078) 30. ND

Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01 •RESULTS listed as 'ND' vere not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Lim


C O A S T • T O • COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Air, Water 4c Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories



(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438


Lab Number : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW





CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) •PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L /ig/L

Endrin (72208) 30. ND Endrin Aldehyde (7421934) 20. ND Heptachlor (76448) 5. ND Heptachlor Epoxide (1024573) 5. ND Chlordane (57749) 50. ND Methoxychlor (72435) 10. ND Toxaphene (8001352) 300. ND PCB 1016 (12674112) 300. ND PCB 1221 (11104282) 300. ND PCB 1232 (11141165) 300. ND PCB 1242 (53469219) 300. ND PCB 1248 (12672825) 300. ND PCB 1254 (11097691) 300, ND PCB 1260 (11096825) 300, ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol (59507) 10. ND 2-Chlorophenol (95578) 10. ND 2,4-Dichlorqphenol (120832) 20. ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol (105679) 30. 150. 2,4-Dinitrophenol (51285) 100. ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (534521) 100. ND

Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; L.A.C •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit)

04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/man/mjd CJ05761075B

Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories


ScjCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012

(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438


Lab Number : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW


SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MATRIX SAMPLED BY

Page 5 of 5

SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED


CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) •PQL RESULT NOTE /jg/L f j g / L

2-Nitrophenol (88755) 10. ND 4-Nitrophenol (100027) 100. ND Pentachlorophenol (87865) 30. ND Phenol (108952) 10. 110. 2,4,e-Trichlorophenol (88062) 10. ND Phenol-d5 (Surrc^gate Standard % Recovery) 65. 2-Fluorophenol (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 66. 2,4,6,-TribromDphenol (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 72. Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 72. 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 87. 4-Terphenyl-dl4 (Suixogate Standard % Recovery) 72. Cresols 10, 720. Methylnaphthalenes (91576) 20, ND

Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit


Respectfully submitted, COAST-TO-CQAST ANAI^TICAL SERVICES,

Mary Havlicf President

INC.

i i I '

;,' .,.,,

·'<, •' ·'

... \

'"/.::· '·'

'·t

···. ,.-,_·· ..

' "·

.;·

,.·

) .

I~ ~· 'i~

. . · :'J,'.' .. , ~~ ·:. :/ ',;I' ...

~ ',,;

. t'. ."".·

~ ( '· ....

,,;. . ' .. " . • •• ~J • . . . ~ .-..... . ~'

-;-,,

·-·, , .. •'

' ~. ' .

,, ' .~,-,.

... , , ... '•', .. /,: ::~

·. ~- ·' '<·' : ,. ~.

r· -.:· .. ·

'J· - ...

~ ;t' . ~ ' ,. . .: · .. ,,

' •.,· .( ) .,

•:,.:-.

~·.

.:· · .. : ·) ; ~ . .. ~ "1 :· . ;, ;,~' '· '·'

' ~· ~-.. - I

.;

,.., ~ ·. '

·.· ~ . '• : . . ~ '

'!I; . ',• '\-. '-;,

't'

. ~- --... ''. - •' •, /' ((.

i·

. ·' .,· '·.·

:. ·~.

J_'"''

'·'}' \

' / ~ ~ ~ ~-;· ..

• I ·~

:,;/1. ~ <·t, c;

\;•1

.· ~. ' •• 'J •. _;·

'.f· ·---<.. ,, . . • ... ~ .

--~·. ~: ,·_

;-_,

'.''.·. \:!

.''

· .. ·.· ... _ .....

_._, .·.-..... ··- .· .,.

FRESNO LANDFILL RI SLUG TEST ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Wal l 10

S c r s s n

Infarval

(Dspth • tt)

H y d r o g s o l o g i c

Uni t

Gsophys i ca l

Log

L i tho logy

Dr i l l ing

L o g

L i tho logy

Hvo rs lav

Wa l l

R a d i u s

S c r a a n

Lang th

B o r a h o l a

Dlamatar

To K

fVday

Commanta

C D M - 2 A 6 0 - 8 0 A 60-64 Clay, 64-68 Sand

68-70 Clay, 70-74 Silt

74-60 Sand

60-66 Sand

68-74 Silty C lay

74-76 Sandy Silt

le-BA.S Sand

4 ' 20' 0,802'

7385E-04

1.377E-03

3.496E-04

22

1 2 - 4 7

Slug Ins. - Poor Data

S lug Recovery - Median

Slug Recovery • Range

C D M - 5 A 6 0 - 6 0 A 60-62 Clay, 62-64 Silt

64-66 Sand , 64-72 Sit & Clay

72-74 Silt, 74-60 Sand

60-68 Sandy Clay

68-60 Sand

4" 20' 0.802' 3.056E-05

1.111E-05

469

244

206-301

S lug In - Poor Data

S lug Out • G o o d Data

S lug Out - Range

C D M - 7 A 6 0 - 8 0 A 60-63 Silt, 63-77 S ,Snd /Snd

77-78 Silt, 78-80 Clay

60- 61 Sndy Clay

61- 60 Sand

4- 20' 0,802'

1.076E-04 25,2


Logger Started Late

S lug Out - Quest ionable

Logger Started Late

C 0 M - 2 B t 2 6 - 136 Upper B l

(115-144)

126-128 Silt, 128-130 Sand

130-132 Silt, 132-134 Clay

134-136 Silt

126-128 Silt

128-131 S . S a n d / S a n d

130-136 Clayey Silt

A' 10' 0.802' 2,833E-04

4.S14E-05

2,607E-04

2.31SE-04

112

112-594

17

17- 10

S lug In ' Poor Data

S lug In - Range


S lug Out - Range

C D M - S B 122-132 Upper B2

(124-148)

122-124 Silt, 124-127 Sand?

127-132 Silt

H 2 0 122-126,130-134

116-124 Sand

124-128 S , Silt ,

128-132 S a n d

4- 10' 0.802'

g.056E-0S 49


S lug Out • Great Data

C D M - 2 C 220 - 235 C

(200-238)

220-222 Clay, 222-230 Sand

230-232 Silt, 232-234 Sand

234-235 Silt

220- 221 Sand

221- 222 S . Silt

222- 229 S . S a n d / S a n d

229-235 Sandy C lay

5- 15' 0,802' 2,706E-0S

3.917E-05

194

168 - 252

134

100-154

S lug In • Poor Data

S lug In - Range


S lug Out • Range

C D M - 5 C 2 1 0 - 2 2 5 c (220-232)

210-212 Clay, 212-220 Silt

220-223 S a n d , 223-225 Silt

Best H 2 0 ® 220-223

210-219 S , Sit/Silt

219-222 C . Silt

222-224 S a n d

224-227 S . C lay

5- 15' 0.802' 1.031 E-04

7271E-OS

SI

72

Slug In • Good Data

S lug Out - G o o d Data

C D M - 7 C 201 - 2 1 6 Lower B/Upper

C @ 2 1 6 - 2 3 7

201-207 Silt, 207-210 Clay

210-216 Silt

194-208 S . Silt

208-240 S . S n d / S a n d

5- 15' 0.802'

2,0e33E-OS 252


S lug Out - Okay Data

0.01 - -

0.001

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2A INSERTION

• - • • - • JC I

X

• • • • • 0.1

(I 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2B INSERTION

1 -r

O X I

X

0.1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 20 INSERTION

0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15

Time (Minutes)

0.17 0.19 0.21

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5A INSERTION

1 T

o X I

X

0.1 ' • ' • I ' * • ' 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08

Time (Minutes)


Time (Minutes)

I X

o X I

X


0.1 • I • • • • I • • • ' I •' 0.02 0.04 0.06

0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL CDIVi2A REMOVAL

I X

o X I

0.1 0.5

\

• ^ B •

^

—.—.—>—^—h . . . 1 ' • Upper 1 • 1 • 1 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 —

• • ^^""^^ Lower

\ v Median

I 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — ' — ' — ' — 1

1.5 2

Time (Minutes)

2.5 3.5

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2B REMOVAL

I X

o X I

0.1 I I I I * t I I I I I I t I I I I I ' I I T ' ' I ' * ' '

K2

I I I ~1 I I

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Time (Minutes)

1 -r

O X I

X

0.1

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 20 REMOVAL

• • • • I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I LT 1 1

K2 -1 , I I I I I I I I I I im I •

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5A REMOVAL

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5B REMOVAL

JC I

X

0.1 I I u I I I I I I I t I I I ! ' J I I I L- t i l l

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

Time (Minutes)


1 -r

O X I

X

0.1 I t - i I L.

0.05

J I T I L_ _I I I 1_

0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Time (Minutes)

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 7A REMOVAL

1

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

Time (Minutes)


1 T

I X

0.1 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

Time (Minutes)

AQUIFER PUMPIIMG TEST EVALUATIONS

FRESNO RI AQUIFER TEST ANALYSIS SUMMARY

WELL METIIOD T (FtVday) COMMENTS S

U-16 Pumping Jacob 12,430 AS=4.4 ft, t 10 min.

U-16 Pumping Jacob 68,400 AS=0.8 ft, t = 30-500 min.

U-16 Pumping Specific Capacity 25,800

U-16 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 13,680 AS=4,0 ft, t/t'= 60-400. 0,27

U-16 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 170,980 As=0,32 ft, t/t'= 1-8,

U-16 t=88,400

W-5 Pumping Theis 176,260 Type curve to fit later data. 0.75

W-5 Pumping Jacob 193,540 Meets u 0.01 criteria. 0,49

W-5 Pumping Jacob 92,740 As=0.59 ft, late-time. 11,6

W-5 Pumping Jacob 321,850 As=0.17 ft, t = 5-100 min. 2.8

W-5 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 132,160 As=0.414 ft, t/t'= 1.5-3.

W-5 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 303,970 As=0.18 ft, t/t'= 3-30.

W-5 f=148,700

DW-IB Pumping Theis 78,750 Curve fit to earlier data. 0,001

DW-IB Pumping Theis 167,620 Curve fit to later data. 0.00029

DW-IB Pumping Jacob 177,120 Meets u 0,01 criteria. 0.00025

DW-IB Pumping Jacob 95,990 As=0,57 ft, t ^ 100 min.

DW-IB Pumping Jacob 202,650 AS=0,27 ft, t > 100 min, much data scatter.

DW-IB Recovery t/t'-Jacob 94,340 AS =0,58 ft, t/t'= 10-30.

DW-IB Recovery t/t'-Jacob 237,890 As=0.23 ft, t/t'= 2,5-7.0.

DW-IB f=196,300

DW-IC Pumping Theis 59,400 Curve to fit early data. 0.0007

DW-IC Pumping Jacob 142,490 Meets u 0,01 criteria. 0.0001

DW-IC Pumping Jacob 68,390 AS=0.80 ft, t 100 min.

DW-IC Pumping Jacob 147,880 AS=0.37 ft, t > 100 min.

DW-IC Recovery t/t'-Jacob 64,370 As=0.85 ft, t/t'= 8-20.

DW-IC Recovery t/t'-Jacob 210,440 As=0.85 ft, t/t'= 2-6.

DW-IC f=166,900

CDM-4B Pumping Theis 62,582 Curve to Tit early data. 0.0015

CDM-4B Pumping Theis 167,180 Curve to Ht later data. 0.0008

CDM-4B Pumping Jacob 235,300 Meets u i 0.01 criteria. 0.0004

CDM-4B Pumping Jacob 198,960 AS =0.275 ft, t > 200 min, corrected.

CDM-4B Recovery t/t'-Jacob 437,720 AS=0,125 ft, t/t'= 2-5.

CDM-4B Recovery t/t'-Jacob 124,350 As=0.44 ft, t/t'= 6-10.

CDM-4B f=200,500

CDM-4C Pumping Theis 99,190 Curve to Ht early data. 0.001

CDM-4C Pumping Theis 203,330 Curve to fit later data. 0.0003

CDM-4C Pumping Jacob 241,060 Meets u i 0.01 criteria. 0.0002

CDM-4C Pumping Jacob 176,500 AS=0.31 ft, t > 200 min, corrected.

CDM-4C Recovery t/t'-Jacob 437,720 AS =0.125 ft, t/t*= 2-5.

CDM-4C Recovery t/t'-Jacob 124,350 As=0.44 ft, t/t'= 6-10.

CDM-4C f=207,000

CDM-1 A, 1B Pumping Test water levels

0.0000 500.0000 1000.0000 1500.0000 2000.0000 2500.0000

Time (min) 3000.0000 3500.0000 4000.0000

CDM-1 A — t — CDM-1 B

STATIC WATER LEVELS 0.35-

0.25

Q) D) C ca

XI

o

> 0) (D

t5

0.15

0.05

-0.05

0.0000 100.0000 200.0000 300.0000 400.0000 TIME (min)

500.0000 600.0000 700.0000

W-5 MW-2 DW-1B

STATIC WATER LEVELS

0.0000 100.0000 200.0000 300.0000 400.0000

TIME (min) 500.0000 600.0000 700.0000

CDM-4A - i i i - CDM-4B CDM-4C

WELL U-16 water level changes

A. ^

lib

L

L

k

\ . L

o

Q

Q

0.0000 200.0000 400.0000 600.0000 800.0000 1000.0000

CUMULATIVE TIME (min) 1200.0000 1400.0000 1600.0000

WELL U-16 water level changes PUMPING PLOT

o

Q

Q

0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000

TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000

WELL U-16 water level changes RECOVERY PLOT

5 o Q

< QC Q

1.0000 10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000

TIME (t/f) 10000.0000 100000.0000

Observation Well Water Level Changes Pumping Phase

0.1000 1.0000 10.0000

TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000

w-5 MW-2 DW-1B - Q - DW-IC

0.1000

Observation Well Water Level Changes Pumping Phase

1.0000 10.0000

TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000

EW-1 ^ CDM-4A CDM-4B - Q - CDM-4C

0.9-

0.8-

0.7-

4—.

0.6-CD

0.6-

Oi c

ha

0.5-

O "Q)

0.4-> 0.4-

0.3-

0.2-

0.1-

-0.1-1.0000

1

Observation Well Water Level Changes RECOVERY PLOT

10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000

TIME (t/f)

W-5 -X- MW-2 DW-1 B - s - DW-1 C

1.0000

Observation Well Water Level Changes RECOVERY PHASE

10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000

TIME (t/f)

EW-1 CDM-4A CDM-4B - s - CDM-4C

Well U-16 Pumping Test Data

^ T =9.016 f t V H i n

S = 47.43

1 I 1 i 1 lill i i i i 1 iill i i i i i l ! ; 1 I t t i i i i ; i t i i t i ±

1 I

I A I i I III i : I I I i ! j l i i i i i

AQTESOLV GERRGHTV & MILLER. INC

Modeling Group

Well U-16 Pumping Test Data I i 1 iIllij 1 I 11 iilij I i 111 ill

- T =35.89 f t^ /n in S = 8.5567E-e7

I-

D

hs.

I i t t i t 11 i i i i i i4

i

i I I l l l j j l I I : ; t :s ; l l l l i ! ! f \ n . Jt I I : : j

AQTESOLV GERRGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Group

A V V 1

fell U-16 Pumping Test Data .= I i i i i Miill

U I t

lu.

i O i5 10<U

Hi iy

f*. 4

~ * L

i T =8.693 ft^/nin

u

-P ^ «

•

6r

il i> i M i ifH

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC.

Modeling Group

a . i •S:? r I±I

^ V V '* V

FRESNO PUMP TEST - WELL W5 DATA

o

U l l l l l l l l | I T = 122.4 r ± ^ y n i n

I- S = 0.7529

0.1

0.01 Mini

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

M o d e l i n g Giroup

0.0010.01 0.1 1 10. 100.1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMP TEST - WELL W5 DATA

.'H

P

1.

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

O.S

O.i

t= I I iiiiii

T = 134.4 r ± ^ y n i n S = 0.4933

AQTESOLV GERRGHXy MILLER. INC

0. 0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000.

Time (min)

M o d e 1 i n g G v o u p

llllffl]

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA CTTT

T I- S

0.1

0.01

III \r\\m = 5 4 . 6 9 r t - ^ / n i n = e . 0 0 1 0 7 7

mill!

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

Sr MILLER. INC.

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (min)

100.1000.

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA U I I Iiiiil

T S

f=i

0.1 -

0.01

= l i e = 0 . 0 0 0 2 8 8 6

Illll!

AQTESOLV ^GERflGHTV Sr M I L L E R . INC

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 0.1 1.:. 10. Time (min)

1 0 0 . 1 0 0 0 .

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA

PI

O

o

1.

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.

[= I i iiiiiii I I iiiiiij I I lllllll I I lllllll I

T = S =

123. r t ^ y n i n O .0002509

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IC DATA

rt

Q

10

1.

0.1

0.01

F T T I I lllllll I I TT

T = 4 1 . 2 5 r t - ^ / n i n S = 0 . 0 0 0 7 0 5 6

I I IIIIII iilUi

lllllll I iiiimj

E AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

Sr M I L L E R . I N C .

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IC DATA 1= I llllllll I llllllll I llllllll I llllllll I llillllll I IIIIW o

1 .8

1 .6

1 .4

1

O 1.

1^ 0 .8 rt

0 .6 Q 0 .6

0 .4

0

0.

E T = 9 8 . 9 5 r ± ^ y n i n = - S = 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 7 4

I i

g AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 o.i 1.. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA 1.

rt U P

0.1

0.01

\—I—I I l i l l _ T = 4 3 . 4 6 r t ^ y n i n - S = 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 9

TTq

A Q T E S O L V GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

10. J. Uu 1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA \ \ I I II I u

o

rt

P

O.i

0.01

T 1—TTT T = 116.1 rt^/Min S = 0.0008273 P =0.01

10. l O U . Time (min)

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC.

Modeling Gvoup

1000.

FRESNO PUMPING TEST -1.

0.9

CDM-4B DATA 1 T T T T T H

T = 1 6 3 . 4 r t - ^ y n i n

100. Time (min)

i AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

1000.

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA

<t-i

O

rt

P

1. E

0.9

0.8 i

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.

T 8

1 \ 1 I I I I I I = 90.57 rt^yni n = 0.001081

10. 1 nn Time (min)

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

Sr MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

1000.

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4C DATA

rt

P

0.1

0.01

L i I lllllll I I lllllll I I Illliij

_ T = 6 8 . 8 8 r t - ^ y n i n S = 0 . O O 1 0 4 7

- -1 .1 . l l i 1 = 11

I I Mill'

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

Sr MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

0.0010.01 0.1 10. 100.1000. F-n • _ / » \

1 i ilx C i 111 1 IX }

FRESNO PUMPING TEST -

rt U P

_ T = 1 4 1 . 2 r ± ' ^ y n i r t - S = O . O O 0 3 0 7 5

0.1

0.01

I I lllllll I I lllllll I Ml rm

CDM-4C DATA TTMF

o '•)Oil-.-.—=T

0.0010.01 0.1

T™

AQTESOLV GERflGHTV

& MILLER. INC

Modeling Gvoup

10. 100.1000. Time (min)

FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4C DATA I 11 IIIIII I iiii^ 1.

0 .9

0 .8

••• . 0 .7

0 .6

o 0 .5 d

>• 0 .4

rt

Dr

0 • o

0 .2

0 .1

0.

1= 11 IIII

E T = 167.4 r ± ' ^ / ' n i n =~ S = O.O0O1769

I I lllllll I lllllllj I I I 2

g Ill I I Illll

AQTESOLV 4B^GERflGHTV

'^^Sr MILLER. INC.

M o d e l i n g G v o u p

0.0010.01 0.1 T i i T

1. 10. 100.1000. i m i n)

3 •

a

n

Soil Gas Model

' C D M Camp Dresser & McKee^.

Appendix 0 Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater

Contamination Source at the Fresno Sanitary Landfill

Objective Simulate .potential groundwater contamination from percolating precipitation which has come in contact with contaminated soil gas. Consider two scenarios, a worst case in which the highest soil gas VOC concentrations are used along with conservative asstmiptions; and a more representative case which uses average soil gas VOC concentrations.

Conceptual Approach An off site volume of soil containing VOC contaminated soil gas is considered. Variations in barometric pressure are known to result in "atmospheric pumping" of soil gas from the upper portion of the soil volume. The depth to which this pumping would result in a loss of VOC mass is a function of the soil permeability and the degree of barometric pressure change. Below this depth, diffusion of soil gas to the "pumping" zone above would result in a further loss of VOC mass from the soil volume.

At depths near the water table soil gas VOCs may remain relatively constant in the short term. The capillary fringe will act as a barrier to soil gas contamination of the underlying ground water, however, VOCs would still be expected to diffuse slowly across the fringe. The more significant route of transport of soil gas VOCs to ground water is through percolating precipitation and/or irrigation water. As water percolates through the soil column and comes in contact with soil gas VOCs, it is expected to become contaminated by those VOCs due to partitioning from the gas phase to the liquid phase. The extent of this contamination of percolating water is described by Henry's law which defines ideal partitioning between the liquid and gas phases at equilibrium. As the water continues to percolate, it may eventually enter the aquifer. This percolation process is expected to be more sigruficant than soil gas diffusion across the capillary fringe and is the focus of this modeling effort.

To estimate the potential for percolating precipitation to contaminate ground water the following approach was used.

• Use historical precipitation data to estimate the volume of percolating water used to flush the soil gas VOCs from the vadose zone.

• Assume that a gas collection system is operating at the landfill perimeter which captures soil gas from perimeter soils up to 50 feet from the landfill edge.

' • Assume that no "atmospheric pimtping" of soil gas occurs.

• Select appropriate soil gas VOC concentrations for each of the two scenarios to be modeled based on available soil gas survey data.

• Calculate the mass of each VOC present in soil gas in the soil volume being modeled.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-1 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND<M-13-93 let

Appendix 0 Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater

• Assume that equilibrium partitioning occurs between the soil gas VOCs and the percolating water according to Henry's Law. (i.e., partition reactions are fast compared to the percolation rate).

• Assume that the entire mass of each VOC is flushed by the percolating water volume.

• Estimate the volume of groimd water in the mixing zone beneath the soil colimm.

• Estimate the flux of groundwater into the mixing zone over the assumed time of flushing.

• Estimate the resulting VOC concentrations in groundwater assuming complete mixing.

Assumptions The following numerical assumptions were used in the calculations of these simulations.

• Annual precipitation is 10.5 inches, 20 percent of which flushes the vadose zone and enters the groundwater.

• The average porosity in the "A" aquifer is 0.25.

• The mixing depth in the "A" aquifer is 3 meters.

• The hydraulic conductivity is 100 feet/day.

• The hydraulic gradient is 0.001 ft/ft.

Calculations Worst Case Scenario Assume no irrigation at the south end of landfill and an average precipitation rate of 10.5 inches, 20 percent of which flushes vadose zone to water table.

Flush Volume

(Average RainfalQ(Percent Percolating) = Infiltration depth over the soil column

(10.5)(0.2) = 2.625 inches = 6.7 cm

(490,000 ft2)(—Lni^l = 45,539 = percolation area i 10,76 ft j

(Area)(Depth) = flush volume

(45,539 m2)(0.067 m) = 3,051 m = 3,051,115 L

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-2 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND<^8-13.93 tet

Appendix C Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater

GW Mixing Volume

(mixing area)(mixing depth)(poros!ty) = mixing volume

(45,539 m2)(3 m)(0.25) = 34,154 m = 34,154,250 L

Groundwater Flux Volume

Hydraulic Conductivity = K = 100 ft/ day

• Based on CDM slug tests analyses from wells CDM-2A, -5A, -7A, and on conservative value derived from well pumping test.

Hydraulic gradient = I = 0.001 ft/ ft

• Based on average of July 1992 and February 1993 water level measurements.

Aquifer Porosity = n = 0,25 (Not needed for this evaluation)

• Based on literature values of silt materials; representative of the aquifer.

Use Darcy's Law to calculate groundwater flux:

Q=KIA Q=(100 ft/day)(0.001 ft/ft)(6,890) Q=689 ft /day; in 1 year Q = 251,412 ft - 1,880,562 gal. = 7,120,520 L

Hydraulic Conductivity = K = 100 FT/ DAY

• Based on CDM slug tests analyses from wells CDM-2A, -5A, -7A, and on coi\servative value derived from well pumping test.

Hydraulic Gradient = I = 0.001 ft/ ft

• Based on average of July 1992 and February 1993 water level measurements.

Use Darcy's Law to calculate groundwater flux:

Q=iaA Q=(100 ft/day)(0.001 ft/ft)(ll,480 ft ) Q=l,148 ft /day; in 1 year Q - 419,000 ft' - 3,134,000 gal = 11,862,190L

CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee C-3 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND-C\8-13-93 let

Appendix C Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater

Aquifer VOC Cone

Aquifer VOC Cone mass of VOC In soil volume (mg) flush vol (L) + GW mixing volume (L) + GW flux (L)

Vinyl Chloride = 34,574 mg VC = 0.8 ppb viiiyi v.iiiu u« 3 Q5i ^^5 L ^ 34,154,250 L + 7,120,520 L

TCE Cone = 94,088 TCE ^ ^ 3,051,115 L + 34.154,250 L + 7,120,520 L

PCE Cone = 2,016,061 mg PCE ^ ^ 3,051,115 L • 34,154,250 L + 7,120,520 L

Average Site Wide Scenario Under this scenario, average groundwater concentrations were calculated by normalizing the worst case scenario results according to soil gas VOC concentration differences between the SE comer soil plot and average perimeter soils. The method of estimating average PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride soil gas concentrations for the entire site was described in the text. These concentrations were 3,799 mg/m' for PCE, 509 mg/m' for vinyl chloride.

Groundwater VOC Concentrations

Average GW Cone. = (wor^t ease GW cone.) [ Average soil gas cone, at 15 ft^ \ ^worst case soil gas cone, at 15 ft )

PCE: (45 ppb) f ^ ^ ^ l = 14 PPb i,11,759 mg/m J

TCE: (2 ppb)f 509 ^ 9 l f ] = 1.2 ppb ^847 mg/m';

Vinyl chloride: (0.8 ppb)f ^^"*^] = 0.I ppb i500 mg/m J

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-4 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND-C\8-13-93 let

•"•'.•K'-'>- • :',..:~rs^-i.

3

Groundwater Model

CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee

505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496 -

495 -

494

493

492 h

491

— LEVEL 1 ELEVATION

'T 1 T — r "1 1 1 r "1 T 1 1 r

1743 J

1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHOUSANDS,

OATE/nuE: PLOrtED: DWPlorS CREAIEO: OTNaOWS 0AIE/IlUE:08/liy9J 09:09 SkVt FILE: IPUUPZ6,SAV

FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model

Elevation of Level 1

505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

LEVEL 2 ELEVATION

. .J L 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765

rHOUSANDS,OFFEET OAIE/THIE: PLOTTED: DWPIOTS CREATED: DYNFUW5 DATE/TIME: 0a/ l l /9J 09:09 SAVE FILE: IPUUP26,SAV



505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

- ^ T --r - i

LEVEL 5 ELEVATION

- T I " 1 " •'••T " T " T - T " T r - T r • T~ 1— r

_ 1 L _ _ J L. I I I I l l l l

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 fHQUSANDS,OFFEET

DATE/puE: FIOITEO: (jmPlOIS CREATED: OlrNFlOWS DATE/mC: Oa/nySJ 09:09 SAVEFIE: IF\JVIP2S.S*V



505

504

503

502

501 h

500

499 h

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

... -J- ^ "1 1 I I 1 T" 1 - T 7 — T "~r — r "

LEVEL 4 ELEVATION

J L I I I I L .1 L

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 rHOUSANDS,OFFEET

OATE/nuE: PLOTTED: (m)PlOT8 CREATED: OTNFLOWS DATE/TIME: 08/11/9J 09K)9 • ripuur

I8/11/9J 09:


Elevotion of Level 4

505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495 -

494 -

493 -

492 -

491

- - | T 1 " " "1 " 1 — T • T T T T T 1 T T" r r

lEVEL 5 ELEVATION

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1/49 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHQDSANDS,

OAIE/nUE; PLOrlEO: mtlPlOTS CREATED: (WFL0*5 DATE/HUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVEFU: IPUUPK.SAV



505

504

503

502

501

500 -

499 -

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

r - T r I I I T"1 ' V T T

LEVEL 6 ELEVATION

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHOUSAMDSi

OATE/nilE; PLOnED: 0YNP10T8 CREATED: DtNFLOW OATDTIUE: 08/11/9J 09:09 SAVE f U : iPuViras,s»v



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

•- LEVEL 1 ELEVATION

1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET

n»TE/T1HEi PlOniD. DTNP10T8 CREATED: DTNaOW OAIE/THIE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FILE: FSL62,SAV

FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model


590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

LEVEL 2 ELEVATION

/

1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 . L 1820 1840 1860 1880

IHOUSANDS OF FEET

DATE/HUE: PiOmO: OWPIOH CHEAItD: DnmOW OATt'IlME: 08/07/93 14:25

• SAVC HLE: FSL62.SAV



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

LEVEL 3 ELEVATION

1 T"


DATE/IIUE; PLOITEO: 0WPL0T8 CREATED: OVWLCWS DATE/TIME: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVf FU: FS162.SAV

FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL Regional Model


590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

- |—' r

LEVEL 4 ELEVATION

_ l _ ..L _L 1620 1640 1660 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820

/ -

1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET

PlOrtED. OWPIOIB CREATED: OTNaO*5 DAiynuE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVffl£:PSL«2.»V



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

I r

— LEVEL 5 ELEVATION


OATE/puE: PLOTTED DWP10T8 CREATED: DYNFIOW DATE/TIUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FIE: f SL62.SAV



_1_ . L . -L 1620 1640 1660 m m ' i72o" \ m I m m isoo

_L_ 1820

L _

1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET

DATE/HUE: PLOTTED: DYNPIOTB CREATED: DTNaOW OAIE/nuE: 08/07/93 14:25

^ M n i : FS162.4AV



505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

I I I L

MATERIALS LAYER 1 mm<Z D UNIT - 15 FPD

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS, OF FEET

OATE/nuE; PLOITEO: OtNPlOTS CREATED: OrNFlOTS OAIE/nME: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FILE: IPUUP26.SAV


Materials for Layer 1

505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

MATERIALS LAYER 2 C UNIT - 20 FPD

I I I I

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS. QF FEET

DATE/TIME: PLOITEO; DWPlOra CREATED: 0YNF10W5 DATE/HUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FU: 1PUUP26,SAV



505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498 -

497 -

496 -

495

494

493

492

491

"T •T

MATERIALS LAYER 3 B2 UNIT - 5 FPD B2 UNIT - 20 FPD


DATE/TIUE: PLOTTED: OtNPLOIS CREATED: DWaOWS DAIE/IWE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVEFU: IIMUP26.SAV



505

504

503

502

501

500

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

491

n—1 —T — r r 1 1 r n r "I r 1 T" " r I r

MATERIALS LAYER 4 W / m , Bl UNIT - 10 FPD

rmm ei UNIT - i FPD Bl UNIT - 5 FPD

1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS,

DATE/puE: PLOTTED OriNPLOTS CREATED: OWFlCrW OAIE/nuE; 08/11/93 09:09 Sf tSJU: IPVjl«6,SAV



505

504

503

502

501

500 h

499

498

497 h

495

495

494

493

492

491

r r

MATERIALS LAYER 5 A UNIT - 100 FPD


DATE/TIME: PLOTTED: DrtNPLOTB CREATED: BVNFEOWS DAIE/TIUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FU: IPUUP26,SAV



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

"MATERIALS LAYER 1 D UNIT - 15 FPD

1620" I 1640 1660 1680 1700

I

1720 1740 L 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880

THOUSANDS OF FEET

OATE/puE: PLOTTED: BniPLOTB CREATED: OWIOW DAIE/TIUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FS16ZSAV



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

1620

C UNIT - 0.75 FPD C UNIT - 15 FPD C UNIT -20 FPD C UNIT - 30 FPD

/

1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET

OATE/nuE: PLOITID: DmPlOTB CREATED: DIWIOW DAIE/UME: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FHE: FSl«2.«V



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

4,50

MATERIALS LAYER 3 l i l l l i l l B2 UNIT - 5 FPD

B2 UNIT - 20 FPD B2 UNIT - 10 FPD

1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET

QATE/IIME: PlfllTED owpiora CREATED: OmfflCWS DATE/HUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FSL62.SAV



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

MATERIALS LAYER 4 Bl UNIT - ,5 FPD Bl UNIT - 5 FPD


DAIE/UME: PljOnED. OINPIOTB CREATED: OmflOWS DATE/HUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FS162.SAV



590

580

570

560

550

540

530

520

510

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430


DAlE/puE: PLOITEO: (WPtOTB CREATED: DYWICWS DAIE/nwE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FSL62.SAV



CDM environmental engineers, scientists,

planners, & management consultants^

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

offices worldwide . " . ' Printed on Recyded Paper

Documents

RI rpt, v2 - appendices (final) · 2019-06-14 · 1331 17th Street, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202 CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee . ... Natural Gamma Log CDM-1 Electric Well Log Depth