10
RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

  • View
    223

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

RF Reconfiguration and Testing

Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy DabrowskiLinköping University

Dept. of Electrical EngineeringSE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Page 2: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

2 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Outline

• Testable LNA • RF-DC Detector• Offset-Loopback• Summary, Future Planes

Page 3: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

3 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Recent Chip: RF Sampling Frontend

• A 1.4V, 25mW Wideband Testable LNA in 0.13m CMOS

Page 4: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

4 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Page 5: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

5 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Recent Chip: RF Sampling Frontend

VBias5

OUT-

BWC

VDD

Bias2R

VBias2

R1IN-

VBias4

VBias3

M3

M1

M2

M4M5

C2C

C1C

DR

Bias5R

OUT+Bias2R

R1IN+

M3

M1

M2

M4M5

C1C

DR

VDD VDD VDD

Bias5R

VBias2

C2C

BWC

VBias3

VBias4

2 1 2 1

2 2

1 1

(1 ) 1m m

inm m D m v

g R g RZ

g G R g A

1 5 4

4 1 5

( ). ..

( )m m m D

v m Dm ds ds

g g g RA G R

g g g

2

1 5 3 3 2 2 12 2 2

1 5 2 1

11 1

1 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 1m s m s D

v m s m s m s v s v

g R g R R RF

A g R g R g R R A R A

Page 6: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

6 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Resent Chip: RF Sampling Frontend Due to “PCB” we are not

able to measure NF at high frequencies?

Traces are not even. FR4 not good for >1GHz Connector Pad parasitics

& impedance discontinuities

Remedy: We are working on it …….. New PCB with Rogers not

FR4 or Thin Film Technology TRL calibration

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Frequency (GHz)

NF

(d

B)

SchematicLayoutMeasurment

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Frequency (GHz)

S11 (d

B)

SchematicLayoutMeasurment

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Frequency (GHz)

Vo

lta

ge G

ain

(d

B)

SchematicLayoutMeasurment

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Frequency (GHz)

S22 (d

B)

SchematicLayoutMeasurment

Page 7: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

7 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

RF Testing- RF to DC Detector

VG-LNA Buffer

Q

I

o90

FrequencySynthesizer

Bas

e B

and

Pro

cess

or

Low

pass

Filt

erV

GA

and

ADC

ADCinZ =50

RFSignal

Generator

RF-DCD

C/L

ow Freq B

us

Slow SpeedMU

X

MU

X

T-DAC

T-ADC

D

CBA

E

F

DC/Low Freq Bus

Detector

BPF

Idea! Only from DC measurements. All catastrophic faults

can be detected. Some of parametric

faults. Performance

parameter like Gain, 1dB CP

And may be NF & IP3 Calibration of Detectors

with DC/Low voltage signals only

Page 8: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

8 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

RF Testing- Offset Loopback

BaseBand

Processor

LPF

DACLPF

LNA

LO

Amp T r a n s m i t t

e r

R e c e i v e r (zero-IF)

TA

Test

xtest

ADC

I

Q

900

IQ

IQ

IQ offset

mixerIQ test signal

QPSK is the simplest implementation but others can

be used as well

• Test setup using IQ offset mixer for shared LO

f

f

Tx band Rx band

fTx fRx

)sin()(cos)( txtx Qtest

Itest

)sin()(cos)( txtx Itest

Qtest

t 0

Page 9: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

9 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

RF Testing- Offset Loopback• Test setup using IQ offset mixer for shared LO

QPSK:EVM vs Fault in LNA

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0

Fault Strength (Gain and NF) in dB

EV

M

60dB:40deg 70dB:40deg60dB:15deg 70dB:15deg

QPSK: EVM vs Fault in Down Conversion Mixer

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0

Fault Strength (Gain and NF) in dB

EV

M

60dB 70dB

60dB(Gain Only) 70dB ()Gain Only

= 160

=160

=50

(skew)

Tx I

Tx Q

Rx Q

Rx I

Page 10: RF Reconfiguration and Testing Rashad Ramzan and Jerzy Dabrowski Linköping University Dept. of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

10 Linkoping, OCT 4 , 2006

Future Planes

• New board for complete Chip measurements.• Test for Transceivers with polar modulator

(shared LO) multistandard Transceivers. (with Phillips)

On-Chip phase noise measurements