27
A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008 Bunch length monitoring at CTF3 Anne Dabrowski (CERN) On behalf of all involved CTF3 Technical Meeting 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

  • Upload
    ina

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bunch length monitoring at CTF3. Anne Dabrowski (CERN) On behalf of all involved CTF3 Technical Meeting 22 January 2008. A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008. Outline. Bunch length manipulation at the CTF3 Diagnostics to monitor bunch length at the CTF3 BPR with WR-28 waveguide port - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Bunch length monitoring at CTF3

Anne Dabrowski(CERN)

On behalf of all involved

CTF3 Technical Meeting22 January 2008

Page 2: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20081/20 Bunch length monitoring

Outline

Bunch length manipulation at the CTF3

Diagnostics to monitor bunch length at the CTF3 BPR with WR-28 waveguide port

RFdeflector and Streak Camera

“RF-pickup”

Highlights of Bunch length (and longitudinal dynamics) measurements at CTF3 (2005 – 2007)

New bunch length monitoring required for 2008 and foreseen improvements to the setup of 2007

RF pickup

Combiner ring measurements

Measurements in CLEX

CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 3: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20082/20 Bunch length monitoring

Bunch length @ CTF3

Drive Beam Injector

Drive Beam Accelerator

PETS Line

30 GHz source Stretcher

Delay Loop TL1 (2006)

CR (2007)

TL2

(2007/2008)

CLEX

(2008)

30 GHz tests

RF photo-injector test

Compressor

LINAC ≈ 1- 6 ps

Delay Loop and Combiner Ring > 8 ps

CLEX ≈ 1- 2 ps r.m.s.and Califes < 1 ps r.m.s monitoring system to be developed CERN & CEA/Saclay

CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 4: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Bunch length manipulation using INFN ChicaneBunch length manipulation using INFN Chicane

KlystronV(t)

t

Accelerating structures@Girder 15

4 Bends INFN-Frascati Chicane

BPR & RF pick-

up

Delay Loop

Changing the phase of Klystron 15 to insert a time to energy correlation within the bunch

Convert energy correlation into path length modification and time correlation

Measure the Bunch frequency spectrum

• On-crest Acceleration – the bunch length is conserved through the chicane

• Negative Off-crest Acceleration – the bunch gets longer

• Positive Off-crest Acceleration – the bunch gets shorter

Nominal energyHigher energy

Lower energy

Measure bunch shape & length using RF deflector and OTR screen

MTV

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20083/20 Bunch length monitoring CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 5: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20084/20 Bunch length monitoring

Diagnostics – BPR @CTF3

BPR with WR-28 waveguide port •power measurement at 30 GHz (see talks Lars Soby, CTF3 collaboration meeting 2003

•For given beam current & position, maximise the signal minimise bunch length

http://clic-meeting.web.cern.ch/clic-meeting/CTF3_Techn_Mtgs/2003/Presentations/LSoby30903.pdf)

•BPR’s installed in the CTF3:

after injector

After chicane (girder 4)

After INFN/Frascati Chicane end of the Linac. Waveguide port shared with the “RF-pickup”

Combiner ring

TL2 before entrance to CLEX / TBL

CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 6: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Focusing element

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20085/20 Bunch length monitoring

Diagnostics – Streak Camera @ CTF3

Max sweep 10ps/mm

2 Optical lines installed in 2006 in and after Delay Loop

2 Optical lines installed in 2007 in Combiner Ring

2008 Optical lines foreseen for CLEX

Synchrotron or OTR light from the beam

CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 7: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Streak Camera @ CTF3

Long optical lines to the streak camera Laboratory

2 Optical lines in 2006•Synchrotron Radiation in the Delay Loop•OTR in the linac in TL1

SR@ Delay Loop

= 8.9ps (2.7 mm)“Nominal” chicane - R56 = 0.45

OTR@ linac

= 4.5ps (1.4 mm)

Sweep speed of 10ps/mm

tim

e

tim

e

Page 8: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Phase coding in thesub-harmonic bunching system

Bunch frequency multiplicationBunch frequency multiplication in delay loop

0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000

1000

2000

3000

4000

Lig

ht I

nten

sity

(a.

u.)

Time (ps)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000

500

1000

1500

2000

Lig

ht I

nten

sity

(a.

u.)

Time (ps)

Sweep speed 250ps/mm

SR light in the Delay Loop OTR light after recombination

Streak Camera @ CTF3

2006-2007

Page 9: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Streak camera sweep speed 500ps/mm

0 1000 2000 3000 40000

500

1000

1500

Lig

ht I

nten

sity

(a.

u.)

Time (ps)0 1000 2000 3000 4000

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Lig

ht I

nten

sity

(a.

u.)

Time (ps)

trigger@642ns trigger@644ns

0 1000 2000 3000 40000

500

1000

1500

2000

Lig

ht I

nten

sity

(a.

u.)

Time (ps)

trigger@646ns

Phase Switch ~ 5-6 ns ; 8 % satellite

Phase coding in thesub-harmonic bunching system

Streak Camera @ CTF3

2006-2007

Page 10: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

CR.MTV0451

CR.MTV0496

Optical Chicane

New SC lab

Streak Camera @ CTF3

2 new optical lines installed in 2007 on the Combiner ring

2007

Page 11: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

“RF-Pickup”

Setup @ CTF3 was installed & first data taking in Nov 2006

Non-intercepting device, easy to implement in machine, sub-ps resolution, self calibrating if bunch length scan is performedRF deflector and/or a streak camera @CTF3 provide an excellent cross calibration of device

PAC07 proceedings: http://doc.cern.ch/archive/electronic/cern/preprints/ab/ab-2007-070.pdf

10/20

Pow

er

Sp

ectr

um

[a

.u.]

Freq [GHz]

Theory

(30 – 39) ; (45-69) ; (78-90) & (157-171) GHz

CTF3 Technical meeting

Filters to separate signal into 4 frequency bands

2 down-mixing stages in each band

Stage 1 = synthesizer 2-14 GHz

Stage 2 = fixed mixer @ 26.5; 56.5;75 and 157 GHz

Measure the power power spectrumspectrum of the beam at each frequency band:

Page 12: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Bunch Length measurement using “RF Pick-up” @ CTF3 2006

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 200811/20 Bunch length monitoring

• Data analysed using a self calibration procedure Chi square minimization.

• 16 measurements (corresponding to 16 different phase settings of MKS15)

• Fit done with lowest 3 mixing stages (< 100 GHz).• 19 free parameters fit 3 response amplitudes and

16 bunch lengths

16 3

2)()2((2 )(22

j iij

fi yeA ji

CTF3 Technical meeting

0 ps

4 ps

Phase MKS 15 (degrees)

Goal 2007:Goal 2007:Optimise highest frequency measurement > 143 GHzCross calibrate device with RF deflector measurements

Page 13: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

RF Pick-up @ CTF3 2007

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 200812/20 Bunch length monitoring

Improvements to setup in 2007:RF Diamond window (0.500 ± 0.005 mm thick) prototype installed

previously ~ 3 mm thick Al2O3

Parabolic filter @ 143 GHz (measure beam frequencies (157 ± 14 ) GHz) & re-focus better reflecting signal

In 2006 Filter was @ 157 GHz

Hardware inc. D-band Waveguide Components, RF Window and fast ADC’s provided by Northwestern Univ. 2007

CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 14: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Calibration of device – RF Deflector

Chicane optics & bunch length measurements - 2004

Magnetic chicane (4 dipoles)

RF Deflector Screen

Betatron phase advance(cavity-profile monitor)

Beta function at cavity and profile monitor

Beam energy

RF deflector phase

RF deflectorwavelength

Deflecting Voltage

Bunch length

y0

y

Deflecting mode TM11

RF deflector off RF deflector on

13/25 A. Dabrowski, 17 October 2007CTF3 Technical meetingBunch length monitoring

Page 15: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

RF deflector @ CTF3

- Bunch Length Measurement with the 1.5GHz RF Deflector of the Delay Loop -

• Maximum power of 20MW• 5degrees @1.5GHz = 9.25ps

OTR screen

noRF = 0.35mm0Xing = 2.9mm (6.7ps)

RF deflector off

RF deflector on : 0 Xing

2006-2007

Page 16: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Measurement RF deflector 2007

Measurement method (“scan” method)

Slide H. Shaker

Change the 1.5 GHz RF deflector phase and measure the average intensity of a thin band on the middle of screen per each phase. The phase of RFD related to bunch length by c/f factor. (c is speed of light and f=1.5 GHz) Matlab code written for automisation of the scan

Standard deviation * c/f = 2.84 ± 0.35 mm

Phase of RFD (degree)

Aver

age

Inte

nsity

Page 17: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Measurement RF deflector 2004-2007

““Single Image” method:Single Image” method:

1) Measure the bunch length in monitor in pixel units for a single image2) Calibrate the monitor by finding the equivalence between pixel unit and length unit (mm) by measuring the relationship between the center of the image position per RF deflector phase

AdvantageAdvantage “Scan” method vs. “Single Image” method:

Avoid non-linearity effects from the screenImage can be bigger than the screen (improved resolution)

Disadvantage Disadvantage “Scan” method vs. “Single Image” method:

Need to assume bunch shape remains constant during the scan

Slide H. Shaker

Example of Calibration curve for “Single Image” method ref. D.Alesini et al CTFF3-010 INFN

Used in bunch length measurement from CTF3 2005 data

Page 18: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Measurement RF deflector 2007

May 2007

Bunch length = 2.45 ± 0.28 mmPhase of MKS constant for 7

measurements, “Scan” method used

Bunc

h Le

ngth

(mm

)

Slide H. Shaker

December 2007

Wanted to calibrate “RF-pickup” with RF deflector measurementsProcedure established, but beam not stable enough for reliable calibration (beam shape not constant, large current contribution in satalites)

To be completed in 2008

Bunc

h Le

ngth

(mm

)

Klystron 13 Phase (degree)

Page 19: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

• Make absolute calibration of the “RF pickup” already installed after delay loop &

understand resolution (use RF deflector and compare)

• Learn from “RF pickup” already installed to design most cost effective solution &

sensitive design for bunch length monitoring in CLEX Selection of down mixing frequency stages

Length of waveguide vs. down mixing closer to machine?

Requirements on ADC’s

Need for 2 stage down mixing?? Save on cost of synthesizer?

Optimal RF window

• Development of RF pick-up / RF deflector for TL2 and Califes (collaboration with

CEA/Saclay) characterise the longitudinal dynamics of the beam

• Prepare a new Streak Camera laboratory for CLEX

• Invest in New Streak Camera (± 180 K euro) for CLEX

For 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 200819/20 Bunch length monitoring CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 20: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Conclusion

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 200820/20 Bunch length monitoring CTF3 Technical meeting

Optical lines to Streak Camera in & after DL successfully measured: ** bunch length, ** 180 degree phase switching & ** Bunch frequency multiplication 2005-2007Two new optical lines have been installed in CR, to the New CR Streak Camera Laboratory 2007Bunch length measurements with RF deflector performed using 2 methods 2004-2007“RF pickup” with improvements in 2007 commissioned to measure bunch length at end of LINAC (or after delay loop) 2006-2007 Absolute calibration of “RF pickup” with RF deflector started finish 2008

2008 focus2008 focusFully characterising the “RF pickup” Designing a monitoring system for TBL & Califes (collaboration with CEA/Saclay)

characterise the longitudinal dynamics of the beam Prepare a new Streak Camera laboratory for CLEXWould need to Invest in New Streak Camera (± 180 K euro) for CLEX

Page 21: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Thank you’s

RF-pickup installation acknowledgements and thank you’s must be made to:

Hans Braun and Thibaut Lefevre for advising and collaboration in the design of the systemAlberto Rodriguez for collaborative advice in the Labview Acquisition and DAQ for pickupRoberto Corsini, Peter Urschütz, Frank Tecker, Piotr Skowronski and Steffen Döbert for general collaboration, and in particular for the machine setup of the bunch compression scan to do the first measurement.Stephane Deghaye for Aquiris card installationJonathan Sladen and Alexandra Andersson general consultationErminio Rugo and Frank Perret for mechanicsRomain Ruffieux and Christian Dutriat for electronics (BLMs & pickup)Mayda Velasco, Northwestern University and DOE

Support from the BI groups at CERN

All Collaborators on bunch length measurements inc Andrea Ghigo & the Frascati team CTF3 Technical meeting

Page 22: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

Extra slides

Page 23: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20081/24 Bunch length monitoring

TL2 line, bunch length monitoring

CTF3 Technical meeting

CM

.BH

L 0

100

CCS.MTV 0980

CC

.VV

S 0

900

CC

.QF

L 0

910

CC

.QD

L 0

920

CC

.BP

R 0

915

CC

.BP

M 0

930

CC

.WC

M 0

960

CC

.MT

V 0

970

CC

.VP

I 095

0

CC

.DH

D/D

VD

094

0

CB

.VV

S 0

100

CB

.QF

M 0

110

TL2 line

Use this BPR waveguide port as a pickup for bunch length measurements Design of “RF pickup” still under discussion to optimize resolution and cost (collaboration CEA/Saclay)

OTR light from CC.MTV0970 sent to NEW CLEX Streak Camera Laboratory

Page 24: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

TBL in 2008

TL2’ line

Prototype Module

CM

.BH

L 0

100

CCS.DUM 0995

CCS.VPI 0990

CCS.MTV 0980

CC

.VV

S 0

900

CC

.QF

L 0

910

CC

.QD

L 0

920

CC

.BP

R 0

915

CC

.BP

M 0

930

CC

.WC

M 0

960

CC

.MT

V 0

970

CC

.VP

I 095

0

CC

.DH

D/D

VD

094

0

CB

.DH

D/D

VD

014

0

CB

.DH

D/D

VD

013

0

CB

.VV

S 0

100

CB

.QF

M 0

110

CB

.QD

M 0

120

CB

.BP

M 0

150

CB

.PE

T 0

220

CB

.BP

S 0

210

CB

.QD

R 0

200

CB.MOV 0205

CB

.VP

I 021

5

CB

.VP

I 013

5

TL2 line

TL2 spectrometer

17th December 2007

CB

.WC

M 0

132

Page 25: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

TL2 Magnet Layout1st October 2007

BH

H 0

200

BH

G 0

500

BH

H 0

600

BH

H 0

700

BH

G 0

800

BV

A 0

300

BV

B 0

400

SH

C 0

120

SH

D 0

110

QF

G 0

140

QD

G 0

160

QF

H 0

210

QF

H 0

180

QF

L 0

270

QD

L 0

280

QD

H 0

220

QF

H 0

230

QD

H 0

330

QF

H 0

350

QD

H 0

370

QD

L 0

430

QF

L 0

450

QD

L 0

470

QFL 0530QDL 0550

QFL 0570QFL 0620QDL 0650

QFL 0680

QFL 0730QDL 0750

QFL 0770

QD

D 0

820

QF

D 0

840

DHD/DVD 0175

DHD/DVD 0125

DHD/DVD 0225

DHD/DVD 0265

DHD/DVD 0345

DHD/DVD 0435DHD/DVD 0525

DHD/DVD 0615

DHD/DVD 0655

DHD/DVD 0765DHD/DVD 0855

KH

C 0

250

XLC 0580

XLC 0720

XLA 0630XLA 0670

All names with prefix CC.

Dipoles (Horizontal) 5

Dipoles (Vertical) 2

Quadrupoles 25

Sextupoles 4 Correctors 11

CL

EX

QF

L 0

910

QD

L 0

920

e-

VV

S 0

900

VP

I 09

50

BP

M 0

930

BP

R 0

915

WC

M 0

960

MT

V 0

970

DH

D/D

VD

09

40

Bldg 2003B

ldg

20

10

SL

H 0

255

Page 26: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

CT and CTS lines

CT.B

PM

0515

CT.

WC

M 0

525

CT.

BP

R 0

532

CT.V

VS

0508

CT.B

HD

0510

CT.V

PI

0518

CT.Q

FD

0520

CT.Q

DD

0530

CT.B

HE 0

540

CTS

.BH

B 0

800

CTS

.PH

M 0

545

CTS

.MTV

0550

CTS.V

PI 0842

CTS.M

TV

0840

VP

G

D L

T L1

CTS

Dump

CT.Q

FH

0610

CT.Q

FH

0620

CT.X

LC 0

615

CT.B

PI 0

608

CT.B

PI 0

622C

T.D

HF 0

612

CT.V

PI 0

600

Page 27: A. Dabrowski, 22 January 2008

A. Dabrowski, 22 January 20081/24 Bunch length monitoring

Bunch length monitoring requirements for CLIC

Location in CLIC Machine Bunch Length

mm ps

Drive beam 1.0 3.3

Main Beam at injection 0.044 0.15

Beam Delivery System (IP) 0.044 0.15

Main Beam in damping ring before extraction 1.50 5.00

Combiner Rings 2.00 6.70

http://clic-meeting.web.cern.ch/clic-meeting/clictable2007.html

•Bunch length need to be monitored throughout the machine

•dynamic range 0.1 ps 10 ps