36
Revitalising Rainfed Agriculture in India Dr. J.P. Mishra Adviser Agriculture NITI Aayog, New Delhi

Revitalising Rainfed Agriculture in Indiamospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/cocsso/1_NITI_Aayog... · 2017. 5. 2. · Revitalize seed chain with focus on replacing varieties older than

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Revitalising Rainfed Agriculture in India

    Dr. J.P. MishraAdviser Agriculture

    NITI Aayog, New Delhi

  • •Shortage of water for7.5 to 10 months

    •Wide spread N and Pdeficiencies along withmicronutrients

    •Excessive runoff furtherdeteriorates soilnutrient status

    •Mean annualtemperature >180C, rainfall exceedingevapo-transpiration 2to 4.5 months in a year

    •Alfisols and Aridisols -abundant soil orders

    Water Stressed Cropping/Livestock

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Net Sown Area

    Foodgrain Production

    Population

    Foodgrain Area

    Coarse Cereals

    Pulses

    Oilseeds

    Cotton

    Rice

    52

    44

    40

    48

    83

    80

    73

    68

    40

    % Contribution

  • Water stressed areas provide maximum Protein & Fat

    80

    20

    73

    27

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Rainfed

    Irrigated

    Rainfed

    Irrigated

    Puls

    esO

    ilsee

    ds78

    22

    6436

    7525

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    RainfedIrrigated

    RainfedIrrigated

    RainfedIrrigated

    Cat

    tleSh

    eep

    Goa

    t

    68

    32

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    Rainfed

    Irrigated

    Cot

    ton

    •Major domain forprotein and fatsupplements inIndian diet

    •Leads in theproduction ofpulses, oilseeds, coarse cereals, andlivestock

    •Predominant cottonproducer-stronglinkage with textileindustry andemployment

  • Poverty among Farm Households45

    .3

    35.1

    33.0

    32.1

    28.4

    26.5

    23.2

    22.5

    22.5

    22.5

    18.9

    17.5

    14.0

    13.6

    12.3

    12.3

    11.8

    10.7

    9.0

    4.3

    3.2

    0.5

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0

    50.0

    4

  • Very promising for future growth-needs overall systemic changes in production to delivery services, health and disease control and

    management

    Needs much higher investment for sustaining

    the turn around in horticulture-quality

    storage, cool chains, ripening

    infrastructures-marketing

    With current pace can achieve the cereals.

    Pulses is difficult task-Needs technological

    breakthrough for plant types and also NRM

    5/2/2017 5

    242.34

    17.09

    259.32

    29.8

    361.04

    75.29

    150.58

    127.9

    5.11

    65.6

    8.5

    235

    22

    257

    59

    279

    97

    161

    253

    25

    277

    71

    312

    124

    189

    137.3

    11.4

    100

    12.8

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    Cereals Pulses Foodgrains Oilseeds Sugarcane Fruits vegetables Milk Meat Egg Fish

    Production 2011-12Demand 2016-17Demand 2020-21

    Annual increase in demand at 1.3% forcereals, 3% for pulses, 3.5% for edibleoils, 3.3% for vegetables and 5% in fruits.

    DEMAND - SUPPLY DYNAMICS

  • NEED A PARADIGM SHIFT

    • Move from Commodity centric to an area-focussed approach• Investment in rainfed agriculture at ~Rs. 50,000/ha

    • Knowledge-based Agriculture• Improved inputs, Diversification and R&D

    • Farmers Centric Agriculture• FPOs, Agri marketing & warehouse receipts• Credit, finance and insurance, capacity building

    • Industry-agriculture –farmer linkages• Market infrastructure, export opportunities, agribusiness

    • Government a facilitator• Mission mode approach to enhance land and labour productivity

    • Governance• Convergence matrix of programmatic interventions

  • MOVE FROM COMMODITY CENTRIC TO AN AREA-FOCUSSED APPROACH

  • India is water stressed. 52% of cropped area remains without irrigation and some regions are chronically water stressed yet:

    •Currently, irrigation consumes 84% of the water (industry 12% and households 4%)

    •Water use in irrigation in India is 2 to 4 times that in USA and China per unit of major crops

    Share of canal in net irrigated area declined from 39.8 % to 23.6 %.

    Groundwater sources increase from 28.7 % to a whopping 62.4 % between 1950-51 and 2012-13.

    •In northwest, groundwater is over exploited•In the eastern states, substantial scope for harnessing groundwater remains

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

    Water and Irrigation: Issues

    98.4

    89.0

    78.2

    68.567.463.1

    49.347.641.9

    36.834.929.5

    20.619.918.915.714.213.512.6

    3.8

    1.6

    11.0

    21.8

    31.532.636.9

    50.752.4

    58.1

    63.265.1

    70.5

    79.480.181.184.385.8

    86.587.4

    96.2

    88.282.8

    45.0

    74.5

    48.3

    98.1

    64.1

    40.0

    49.9

    90.7

    115.9

    19.9

    77.5

    0.0

    8.9

    0.0

    11.7

    34.9

    2.2 -0.6

    -20.0

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    120.0

    140.0

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    120.0

    PB HR UP BR DL

    WB UK

    ALL

    IND

    IA JK ML TR O

    D HP AR NL

    MN JH SK MZ

    AS

    % irrigated% unirrgated% of net irrgated area with more than one irrgation

  • 21.7

    72.2

    39.6

    50.146.0 43.3

    55.8

    26.1

    8.4

    31.1

    67.674.9

    80.2

    29.8

    46.6

    21.9

    50.7

    134.6

    58.5

    126.8

    170.3

    5.3

    51.5

    17.9 19.522.1

    12.7

    30.9

    8.32.9

    8.012.7 15.6 9.5

    4.3 0.5 1.6 1.8

    24.7

    1.5

    17.7

    27.8

    21.5

    17.2 16.8 16.3 15.913.9 13.8

    11.9

    8.7 7.96.2 5.3 4.7

    3.6 3.0 2.41.0 0.8 0.2

    -2.7

    -14.6

    -20.0

    -15.0

    -10.0

    -5.0

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    120.0

    140.0

    160.0

    180.0AS U

    PW

    BM

    H AP BR MP

    OR NEH CG KR G

    JTN JH K

    L JK UK RJ

    HP

    HR PB

    Grou

    ndw

    ater

    for

    futu

    re ir

    riga

    tion

    (BCM

    )

    Grou

    ndw

    ater

    dev

    elop

    men

    t and

    pro

    duct

    ion

    % GW Dev Food crops Production (mt) GW for Future Irrigation (BCM)

    Future Irrigation Opportunities

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

    168.2 mt 53.0 mt 75.1 mt

  • KNOWLEDGE-BASED AGRICULTURE

    IMPROVED INPUTS, DIVERSIFICATION

    AND R&D

  • Water Management: Opportunities

    • Shift to Efficient Water Application Tools (EWATs) forconserving the water and raising productivity

    • Water positive techniques- System of Rice Intensification andDirect Seeded to conserve water and raise productivity

    • Divert investments on irrigation technologies andinfrastructure from subsidies to irrigation and electricity: offerfarmer groups a choice between the two

    • Utilize MGNREGA for last mile connectivity and minorirrigation projects/irrigation tanks

    • Complete the nearly complete major irrigation projects underPMKSY

    • Utilize the irrigation potential already created- Prioritise CADAinvestments

    • Specialised solution for chronically water stressed areas

  • •Though the availability of quality seed has increased, SRR remains low in the country•19-22 per cent in pulses

    and below 30 per cent in paddy and wheat•Majority of farmers use

    farm saved seed - many farmers do not distinguish between grain and seed• Sale of spurious seed in

    the market•Private sector

    participation is limited•No guidelines for pricing

    of seed

    Issues

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

    -6.1

    05.8

    0

    -0.5

    1.8 0

    40.9

    10.4 7.90.8 0

    -7.0

    6.0 7.0

    -1.1-1.4

    0

    -4.6

    63.9

    26.619.8

    13.87.4 5.0 4.5 3.2 0.7 -1.4-2.5

    -9.5-10.6-11.4-13.0-15.9-19.8-20.6-25.6

    -40.0

    -30.0

    -20.0

    -10.0

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0 Deviation from desired SRR (%) in wheat and Rice

    Wheat Rice

    -29.48-26.02

    -14.49

    1.41 2.61

    -28.25

    -9.42

    -21.73

    -10.84-7.51

    12

    -27.32-31.71

    -17.24-13.65

    -16.41

    -6.09

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    OD JH BR All India UP WB

    Deviation from desired SRR(%) in pulses

    Urd Mung Arhar Gram

    Seeds, Fertilizer & Pesticides

  • Accelerate SRR to reach 33% in HYVs and 100% in hybrids.

    • Revitalize seed chain with focus on replacing varieties older than ten years by new ones.

    • Incentivise public sector and facilitate private sector to raise quality seed production to generate adequate supply.

    Promote skill in seed production at village level

    Facilitate private investment in R&D of seed and its promotion

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

    Seeds, Fertilizer & Pesticides

  • NPK use is skewed towards. Realign norms for fertilizer use according to products such as urea, neem-coated urea, sulphur-coated urea and urea briquette.

    Inform farmer through soil health card on optimal use of fertilizer by soil type, crop and water usage.

    Encourage the farmers to better calibrate the balance as well as level across different fertilizers

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

  • Farm Mechanization: Issues• Small land holdings, high capital and low credit

    worthiness of farmers • Inadequate rural infrastructural services • Availability of durable, light weight and low cost farm

    implements

    Farm Mechanization: Opportunities • Scale up the custom-hiring centre and replicate the best

    practices of the States;• Reorient public extension agencies from varieties and

    inputs to farm mechanization, RCTs and post harvest activities

    NITI Aayog, Government of India

    Farm Mechanization

  • New Technologies: GM The technology promises

    • Higher productivity • Lower use of fertilizers, weedicides and pesticides

    • Tolerance against drought, salinity and other abioticstresses.

    • Fortification of grains and edible oils with vitamin A andmodified fatty acids

    World’s leading scientific bodies like the US NationalAcademy of Sciences, the UK’s Royal Society, theGerman Risk Assessment Agency, the EuropeanAcademy of Science, the Canadian Royal Society, theNew Zealand Royal Society, and India’s seven scienceacademies have all declared that GM crops are safe

    16

  • As a part of its strategy to bring a SecondGreen Revolution, GM crops needs to bepromoted with appropriate safeguards

    • Recognizing the general sensitivity to permittingmultinationals, proceed with domestically sourced GMseeds only.

    • According to the evidence presented by the leading IndianResearch Organizations, a large number of India sourcedcandidates for field trials and eventual commercializationalready exist. These may provide a good starting point.

    17

    New Technologies: GM

  • NEW TECHNOLOGIES: PRECISION FARMING

    Options Include

    • Precision farming• System of Rice Intensification• Nano-technology• Hi-tech Horticulture and

    Animal HusbandryIntroduce and encouragejudiciously, taking into accountthe cost-benefit factors. Thecriterion in most cases should becommercial viability withoutsubsidies

    18

    Turmeric at Bhavani Block of Erode (2009-10)

  • Shift to High Value Commodities

    Issues • With rising incomes, demand side factors are highly favourable for

    diversification towards high value horticultural, dairy, fisheries, poultry andlivestock.

    • But infrastructure, institutions and public policy are not very favourabletowards the transition in most states.

    Recommendations• Strengthen through public support the livestock disease surveillance, control

    and health infrastructure• Expand cold storage facilities• Provide market finance to farmers• Facilitate the development of food processing industry, which will create

    demand at lucrative prices for high value commodities.

  • Hi-Tech Polyhouse

  • Use of Energy• Energy inputs to Agri. now1.84 kw per ha, this needs to raised 2.2

    kw per ha by 2020.

    • Priority given to harnessing non-conventional and renewableresources of energy.

    Livestock and Fisheries• Induction of high yielding breeds, improvements in animal

    healthcare, feed, fodder, drinkingwater, shelter, institutions, promotion of irrigated fodder etc.

    • Small reservoirs, tanks, water harvesting ponds created underMGNREGA have potential for fisheries development.

    Agri.-Research & Extension• SAUs, KVK could be the centres of knowledge

    development, management and transmission to users.

    •Essential to bring about better synergy between SAUs and ICAR.

  • FARMERS CENTRIC AGRICULTURE

  • Farmer Producer Organisations •FPOs are emerging as useful mechanisms

    • aggregation of inputs/outputs and optimal deployment ofresources

    • access to mainstream capital for improvements inproduction system assets

    • risk reduction through financial measures, croppingchoices; and

    • creates opportunity to scale the quality demanding urbanconsumer and agro-processing industry.

    •RBI will have to include financing to FPOs in its prioritysector

  • Remunerative PricesMSP: Issues • MSP procurement limited to a few crops and regions

    • Persistent demands for higher MSP and ever-rising procurement, which isinfeasible in view of fiscal constraints

    • Subsidized sales of cereals under PDS in regions where there is no procurementdivert part of the demand from local farmers, lowering the price the latter receive

    MSP: Opportunities• Extending MSP and procurement to more crops and regions is infeasible both

    fiscally and administratively

    • Limit MSP-based procurement to building buffer stock and stock for price stabilization

    • For all else, we can level the playing field across regions and crops by replacing MSP by deficiency payments amounting to 10 percent of the market price, which is fiscally feasible and WTO compliant

    • This may be initially tried on a pilot basis in cotton in select districts

    24

  • Farmer Distress and ReliefIssue

    • A mechanism is required to bring quick relief to farmers impacted directly or indirectly by natural disasters.

    Opportunities• Conduct the relief transparently as an emergency social program. Create a

    database that identifies farmers and corresponding Aadhar seeded bankaccounts. In case of a natural disaster, transparently identified by weatherdata and a set of weather related criteria, transfer a minimum specified sumof cash immediately into these accounts.

    • Appropriate avenues to create jobs for those farmers interested in exitingfarming. Farm-oriented processing and small-scale industries offer two suchavenues.

    • Implement PMFBY to deal with distress situations. Evolve a mechanism forthe provision of a diversified set of crop insurance products by a diverse setof insurer firms.

  • INDUSTRY-AGRICULTURE FARMER LINKAGES

  • Industry-Agriculture-Farmer Linkages

    Industry enhance investment

    • imparting knowledge with the use of latest informationtechnologies

    • knowledge institutions which are engaged in agricultureresearch

    • facilitate developing appropriate new technologies combiningfarmers wisdom and traditional knowledge

    • Developing Infrastructure Projects related to secondaryagriculture –processing and value addition

  • GOVERNMENT AS FACILITATOR

  • Utilize the Underutilized•Mission-mode programme for Rainfed Areas

    •Convergence of schemes/programmes.

    •Eastern states and other rain-fed regions suffer from low productivity anddisproportionately greater incidence of droughts, floods and cyclones thatcan destroy standing crops.

    • With procurement concentrated in regions with well-developed irrigation and PDS bringing subsidized grain to eastern states, farmers also face depressed prices in the local markets.

    • abiotic stress -drought, flood, submergence and salinity

    • 11.7 m ha rice fallows that can be used through crop Intensification (short duration pulses and oilseeds in winters)

    • Tribal dominated areas of Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh -Organic bydefault -offer good scope for organic farming.

    • Considerable scope for groundwater development in the region though withthe important qualification that high arsenic levels may disqualify certainareas

  • ENHANCING PUBLIC & PRIVATE INVESTMENTS

    (CONVERGENCES OF RESOURCES)

    •Convergence within agriculture–NFSM, RKVY, PMKSY

    (micro-irrigation), NMOOP, NMAET•Convergence between MoRD, Agri, MoFPI, WR

    –MGNREGA, PMKSY, RKVY, CAD-WM•Overarching structure for Programme Administration

    • Matrix for convergence -activities, responsibilities, scale and outcome

  • Rationalizing Allocation Critical For Capital Formation

    •Crop centric investment under RKVY•Post harvest management got the least

    – Critical for future growth and Make in India initiative

    •Many important sub-sectors allocated less

    – capacity of project preparation and absorption

    – Can it be linked with contribution to State Agri-GDP?

    15.3

    25.3

    20.8

    16.217.5

    18.7

    16.0

    6.88.1

    49.4

    34.4

    46.0 45.242.8 43.2

    34.9

    70.5 70.4

    6.85.7

    4.65.8

    3.54.9 3.9

    2.1 2.4

    18.1

    12.0

    19.8

    16.9

    11.4

    15.0

    4.23.0

    6.56.59.0

    6.38.7

    12.3

    9.4

    21.4

    11.2

    7.9

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 XI Plan 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

    % A

    lloca

    tion

    RKVY: allocation to different sub-scetors in agriculture

    Livestock Crop PHM Micro-irrigation Horticulture

  • Distribution of Resources

    •More than 20%projects toLivestock sector•Very thindistribution ofresources in manyprojects

    – Impact on scale and outcome

    – Effect on outreach

    36.5 37.4 36.6

    30.228.4

    32.6

    26.423.9

    26.2 25.627.4

    25.5 26.127.8

    25.6 26.426.9

    29.026.4 27.3

    5.8 6.04.5

    6.84.2

    5.43.0

    4.4 3.8 3.73.5 4.4 4.2 4.6 3.7 4.2 4.6 4.25.9 5.0

    12.911.3 10.8

    12.414.3

    12.5

    16.8 17.214.8

    16.1

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    Per c

    ent p

    roje

    cts

    RKVY: projects sanctioned in varoious subsectors

    Livestock Crop PHM Micro-irrigation Horticulture

  • Critical Analytical Pathways-A MISSING LINK

    •Production Growth(Based on the information-Chhattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand,Karnataka, MP, Odisha and

    Puducherry)

    –Over 51% projects in < Rs 1 crore category emanated without SAP

    –More than 75% projects in >20 crore emanated from SAP

    –Non-SAP/DAP projects prevailed over SAP-DAP projects in terms of allocation

    39.5

    65.667.0

    68.4

    75.7

    48.6

    44.2

    53.250.5

    53.1

    60.5

    34.433.0

    31.6

    24.3

    51.4

    55.8

    46.849.5

    46.9

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    < 1 Crore

    1-5 crore

    5-10 crore

    10-20 crore

    > 20 Crore

    < 1 Crore

    1-5 crore

    5-10 crore

    10-20 crore

    > 20 Crore

    Per c

    ent

    Projects/ Allocation

    Projects with SAP Projects without SAP

  • 58.05

    67.3

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    20 Total 20 Total

    Per c

    ent

    Number/allocation

    Infarstructure

    Projects with SAP Projects without SAP

    Critical Analytical Pathways-A MISSING LINK

    •Infrastructure (Based on the information-Chhattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand, Karnataka, MP, Odisha and Puducherry)

    – Over 65% projects in < Rs 1 crore category emanated without SAP

    – More than 56% projects and 65% allocation in >20 crore category emanated from non-SAP route

    – Non-SAP/DAP projects prevailed over SAP-DAP projects in terms of allocation

    – Need to reversed for optimum utilization of capital formation

  • NEED A STRONG DATA BASE FOR RAINFED AGRICULTURE

    Generate separate data for rainfed farming- over50% of our geographies unreported

    • rainfed farming and farmers• irrigation systems• seed scenario• infrastructure

    Separate estimates for

    • rainfed crops production and productivity• Livestock and their products

  • Slide Number 1����Water Stressed Cropping/Livestock Water stressed areas provide maximum Protein & Fat�Poverty among Farm HouseholdsSlide Number 5Need a Paradigm ShiftMove from Commodity centric to an area-focussed approachWater and Irrigation: Issues Slide Number 9Knowledge-based Agriculture�Improved inputs, Diversification and R&D�Water Management: OpportunitiesSlide Number 12Seeds, Fertilizer & PesticidesSlide Number 14Farm MechanizationNew Technologies: GM New Technologies: GM New Technologies: Precision FarmingShift to High Value Commodities�Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Farmers Centric Agriculture�Farmer Producer Organisations Remunerative PricesFarmer Distress and ReliefIndustry-agriculture farmer linkages��Industry-Agriculture-Farmer LinkagesGovernment as facilitatorUtilize the UnderutilizedENHANCING PUBLIC & PRIVATE INVESTMENTS�(CONVERGENCES OF RESOURCES)Rationalizing Allocation �Critical For Capital FormationDistribution of Resources Critical Analytical Pathways- �A MISSING LINK Critical Analytical Pathways- �A MISSING LINK NEED a strong data base for Rainfed AgricultureSlide Number 36