33
Project IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) Project IDA II GSN Calibration Procedures November 16, 2011 Peter Davis Project IDA Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego

Review timing and waveform quality:

  • Upload
    corina

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

II GSN Calibration Procedures November 16, 2011 Peter Davis Project IDA Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego. Review timing and waveform quality:. sample rate correction. Sensor failure:. loss of vacuum. Getting the metadata right …. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Review timing and waveform quality:

Project IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers)Project IDA

II GSN CalibrationProcedures

November 16, 2011

Peter DavisProject IDA

Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San Diego

Page 2: Review timing and waveform quality:

Review timing and waveform quality:

Page 3: Review timing and waveform quality:

sample rate correction

Page 4: Review timing and waveform quality:

Sensor failure:

Page 5: Review timing and waveform quality:

loss of vacuum

Page 6: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 7: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 8: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 9: Review timing and waveform quality:

Getting the metadata right…

Page 10: Review timing and waveform quality:

Traditional calibration procedures verified the DAS sensitivity and measured shape of system response.

Page 11: Review timing and waveform quality:

DC Calibration Test

Page 12: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 13: Review timing and waveform quality:

Convolve model of sensor response with input

Compare observed output with model

Iterate until fit acceptable

Page 14: Review timing and waveform quality:

Random binary test determines shape of response curve within 1%

Step input to digitizer determines sensitivity to > 0.1%

Manufacturer provides value of sensor generator constant to within 1%

What these tests measure:

Page 15: Review timing and waveform quality:

Random binary test determines shape of response curve within 1%

Pitfall – capturing the input signal, test only ‘snapshot’

Step input to digitizer determines sensitivity to > 0.1%

Pitfall – compensate for system load

Manufacturer provides value of sensor generator constant to within 1%

Pitfall – not verified

What these tests measure:

Page 16: Review timing and waveform quality:

Sumatra-Andaman earthquake excited many low frequency normal modes

Figure from Park et al. (2004), courtesy G. Roult

Page 17: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 18: Review timing and waveform quality:

Portable sensors used to check sensitivity of permanent sensors:

Page 19: Review timing and waveform quality:

Relative performance of GSN as a network Pitfall – no measure of absolute sensitivity Pitfall – accuracy limited by mode coupling Pitfall – need a very large earthquake to excite the

mode to observable amplitude

What this test measures:

Page 20: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 21: Review timing and waveform quality:

Tides are a continuous, constant signal Tidal amplitudes can be predicted to 1% accuracy

globally Tides are observed at all times at most GSN

stations Pitfall – must include effects of ocean

loading Pitfall – horizontal sensors effected too

strongly by local tilts Pitfall – tidal periods outside band of seismic

interest

Why use tides?

Page 22: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 23: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 24: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 25: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 26: Review timing and waveform quality:

Accurate determination of relative response of the common instruments

Accurate determination of relative orientation

What comparing co-located broadband sensors measures:

Page 27: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 28: Review timing and waveform quality:

Select data from common time period:

Page 29: Review timing and waveform quality:

Correct for modeled response:

Page 30: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 31: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 32: Review timing and waveform quality:
Page 33: Review timing and waveform quality: