Upload
noah-hendricks
View
20
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Review of Religion and Politics Marx - disintegration Durkheim - unification Barakat – generally agrees with Marxist approach. Din (religion) and Dawla (state) Barakat (Society Religion) Lewis (Religion Society) Implications for (in)flexibility of religion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Review of Religion and Politics
Marx - disintegration
Durkheim - unification
Barakat – generally agrees with Marxist approach
Din (religion) and Dawla (state)
Barakat (Society Religion)
Lewis (Religion Society)
Implications for (in)flexibility of religion
Key Issue: Relationship between religion and the state (government)
Islam vs. Islamism – Islam is a religion. Islamism is an ideology defining economic and legal systems based on Islam
Muslim vs. Islamist – Muslims follow the religion of Islam but is not necessarily an Islamist. Islamist has ideologies following Islamism
Distinct Categories of Islamists
Takfiri – radical fundamentalist
Nationalist Militant – combine Islamist ideology with specific local political demands
Institutionalist – seek political role through state institutions
Implications for democratic governance?
Islam as the basis for law
Sami Zubaida reading on the “law state”
Taqlid – imitation; following established teachings uncritically
Ijtihad – independent judgment of a qualified legal scholar (mujtahid)
Madhhab – jurisprudential school of thought
Madhab – School of Thought in Islamic Jurisprudence
Islam as a Tool (cultural “tool kit”)
Framing – “tools that lend order and sense to an otherwise confusing world by providing language that captures or constructs the meaning of problems.”
Framing in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s
What government activities were the movements challenging?• US Troops in Saudi Arabia• Corruption and decadent behavior of ruling family• Extreme economic disparities
Alternative frames – liberal, Marxist-secular, feminist, Islamic
Islamic frame only one that resonated • Led to Nasiha Petition (“memorandum of advice”
from religious scholars demanding change in government behavior)