62
Review of Recharge Mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin Andrew L. Herczeg and Andrew J Love November 2007 Report to the Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Committee under the auspices of a Consultancy Agreement: Commonwealth Dept of Environment and Water Resources, Canberra

Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

Review of Recharge Mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin Andrew L. Herczeg and Andrew J Love November 2007

Report to the Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Committee under the auspices of a Consultancy Agreement: Commonwealth Dept of Environment and Water Resources, Canberra

Commercial-in-confidence (delete if not required)

Page 2: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

2

Enquiries should be addressed to:

Andrew L. Herczeg

CSIRO Land and Water

Private Bag 2,

Glen Osmond SA 5064

+61 88303 8722

[email protected]

Copyright and Disclaimer

© Commonwealth of Australia 2007

This work is copyright. You may display or reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice)

for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use permitted under the

Copyright Act 1968, no all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights

should be addressed to:

Commonwealth Copyright Administration

Attorney-General's Department

Robert Garran Offices

National Circuit

Barton ACT 2600

or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca.

The Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts commissioned CSIRO to

produce this material. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian

Government or the Minister for the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.

Important Disclaimer

CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on

scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or

unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information

without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO

(including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but

not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from

using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it.

Cover Photograph:

From CSIRO Land and Water Image Gallery: www.clw.csiro.au/ImageGallery/File: ASA_STRZ002_011.jpg.

Description: Sunrise on wildflowers in the sand dunes of the Strzelecki Desert near Montecollina, SA.

2004.Photographer: Greg Rinder

© 2006 CSIRO

Water for a Healthy Country report series

ISSN: 1835-095X

Page 3: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

3

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 6

1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 8

1.1 Scope ..................................................................................................... 8

1.2 Objectives.............................................................................................. 8

1.3 Recharge and sustainable yield .......................................................... 9

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................. 11

2.1 Western margin................................................................................... 12

2.2 Coonamble Embayment ..................................................................... 17

3. LITERATURE REVIEW OF RECHARGE MECHANISMS .............................. 21

3.1 Overview.............................................................................................. 21

3.2 Comparison of Recharge Techniques .............................................. 22

3.3 Surface Water Techniques................................................................. 24

3.4 Unsaturated zone................................................................................ 26

3.5 Saturated Zone Techniques............................................................... 30

3.6 Groundwater Age of the Great Artesian Basin waters .................... 35

4. REVIEW OF EXISTING RECHARGE STUDIES IN THE GAB........................ 37

4.1. Western Margin (SA & NT)...................................................................... 37

4.2. Coonamble Embayment (NSW).............................................................. 37

5. RECHARGE MECHANISMS IN THE WESTERN GAB AND COONAMBLE

EMBAYMENT .......................................................................................................... 40

5.1 Conceptual models of recharge.............................................................. 40

Page 4: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

4

5.2 Diffuse recharge.................................................................................. 41

5.3 Localized Recharge. .......................................................................... 41

5.4 Mountain Block Recharge. ................................................................ 42

5.5 Modern and Palaeo-Recharge in the GAB ....................................... 43

5.6 Model Recharge rates in the Great Artesian Basin......................... 44

6. EVALUATION OF APPROPRIATE TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE RECHARGE

IN THE GAB............................................................................................................. 46

7. PROPOSALS FOR ESTIMATING RECHARGE.............................................. 52

7.1 Desktop study ..................................................................................... 52

7.2 Well survey.......................................................................................... 53

7.3 Transects in the unconfined part of the GAB................................... 53

7.4 Unsaturated zone profiles of soil water properties and chloride

mass balance.................................................................................................. 54

7.5 Estimation of direct and localised recharge..................................... 55

8. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................... 56

Page 5: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

5

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Delineation of the project areas considered as part of this review. Also shown are the recharge areas of the Great Artesian Basin not investigated in this review (see Kellett, et al., 2003). ................................................. 9

Figure 2. Topography, aquifer outcrop and extent of the artesian region and unconfined/confined boundary for the western margin of the GAB. No data for NT portion for this map........................................................................... 13

Figure 3. Location map of the south west margin of the Great Artesian Basin, showing location of sampling wells along the northern and southern transect as well as the potentiometric contours (denoted as AHD – Australian Height Datum). The dashed line representing the unconfined/confined boundary indicate where the standing water level in the aquifer is below the overlying Bulldog Shale (i.e, unconfined west of the boundary) or above the Shale (east of the boundary). ................................................................................................................................ 14

Figure 5. Land use and tenure for the western margin of the GAB........................................................................ 16

Figure 6. Map showing the inferred recharge zone within the Coonamble Embayment (after DWR as cited in Brownbill, 2000)..................................................................................................................................................... 18

Figure 7. Map showing the geological formations, topography and present day potentiometric head of the Pilliga sandstone within the Coonamble Embayment (after Wolfgang, 2000) .................................................................. 19

Figure 8. Shaded areas show the extent of flowing bores in the NSW portion of the GAB in 1920 and 1995. ..... 20

Figure 9. Stable isotope data plot for an arid region of Australia (Ti-Tree basin, NT) showing the relationship between amount of rainfall and isotopic composition. The extrapolated groundwater trend shows that recharge occurs predominantly from high rainfall events, indicative of monsoonal systems. ............................................... 26

Figure 10. Schematic diagram, showing the hydrological balance for the conceptual, one-dimensional recharge system for using the chloride mass balance technique. ........................................................................................ 28

Figure 11. Schematic diagram showing different soil water chloride profiles under conditions of a fresh water table (a); saline water table (b) and diffusion to a very deep fresh water table (c) (after Phllips, 2000........................... 29

Figure 12. Cumulative soil water profiles for different land elements showing changes in recharge rates where there is a break in slope (after Leaney et al., 1999)............................................................................................... 29

Figure 13. ............................................................................................................................................................. 32

A list of various groundwater dating methods and the approximate time intervals for which they are valid........... 32

Figure 14. Conceptual flow paths under two recharge scenarios (a) constant recharge over the entire landscape and (b) preferential recharge over an unconfined aquifer becoming confined down-gradient. .............................. 33

Figure. 15. Flood map showing boundaries of a major flood in the Macquarie and Castlereagh catchments (after DWR, 1991)........................................................................................................................................................... 38

Figure 16. Diagrammatic representation of recharge process in the Great Artesian Basin (reproduced from Radke et al., 2000)............................................................................................................................................................ 40

Figure 17 Conceptual diagram showing mountain block recharge which is a likely mechanism within the GAB, particularly the Coonamble zone. .......................................................................................................................... 42

Figure 18. Stable isotope data for the western flow systems (data from Love etal., 200; Zhang et al., 2007) and Coonamble Embayment (data from Radke et al., 2000)........................................................................................ 44

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Summary of different techniques to estimate recharge. Data complied from review of existing literature as well as author’s knowledge - Note much of the data in this table comes from detailed reviews found in Scanlon and Cook (2004). Note Recharge rates in mm/yr, - Spatial scales in m2 and temporal scale in years unless otherwise specified in the table.............................................................................................................................. 48

Page 6: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Scope and objectives

The Great Artesian Basin (GAB) covers about one-fifth of the Australian continent and contains about 8.7 x 106

GL of groundwater in the Jurassic sandstone aquifers. Although there is widespread use of many thousands of

artesian bores throughout the GAB, relatively little is known of the water balance, particularly recharge.

The review is provided within the context of a very large aquifer system where recharge rates have varied

considerably over the time scale of development of the aquifer system. The large reservoir of fresh groundwater

has developed during much wetter climatic conditions in the past that those prevailing over the last 10 000 years

or more. There is no consensus that the water balance of the GAB is currently ‘in balance’ – that is that recharge

rates equal total of discharge via natural discharge and pumping or exploitation of artesian wells.

The objectives of this review commissioned by the Commonwealth Dept. of Environment and Water Resources

on behalf of the Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Committee are:

1. To provide a literature review of methods to estimate recharge

2. To develop conceptual models for the recharge mechanisms of the GAB and advise on appropriate

methodologies for the quantification of recharge in the GAB

3. Develop costed recharge investigation projects in the Coonamble Embayment NSW and the western

GAB in SA and NT.

Review of methods to estimate recharge

4. The various methods for recharge estimation that are relevant to semi-arid and arid regions are described.

These include water balance methods, piezometric methods, unsaturated zone and saturated zone

environmental tracers. The most commonly used methods to estimate diffuse recharge in semi-arid

regions is using chloride profiles in the unsaturated zone. The technique is most accurate when surface

runoff is low, and where estimates of long-term chloride deposition from atmospheric aerosols are

available. Methods to estimates of recharge from direct or localized recharge rates rely of both

unsaturated zone and saturated zone water balance and tracer methods and yield recharge rates that are

one to two orders of magnitude greater than the diffuse recharge estimates.

Previous studies in the GAB

A major recharge study was undertaken in the Queensland intake beds of the GAB (Kellett et al.,

2003) where 14 unsaturated zone profiles were collected. Recharge estimates from that study indicated

diffuse recharge rates of 0.03 – 2.4 mm yr-1 and preferred pathway recharge of 0.5 – 28.2 mm yr-1.

Page 7: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

7

Western margin (incorporating SA and NT)

The western margin is in the driest portion of the GAB and has relatively low hydraulic gradients. This region

has little development and has predominantly pastoral leases. Saltbush and blue bush with patchy acacia are the

dominant land cover. There have been no specific recharge studies done in this area. However, estimates based

on chloride mass balance in the unconfined aquifers in the SA portion of the western GAB suggest recharge rates

of 0.16 ± 0.08 mm yr-1 (Love et al., 2000).

Coonamble Embayment, NSW

The Coonamble embayment is thought to be an isolated part of the GAB, with discharge and recharge occurring

within the Embayment and little if any connection to the remainder of the GAB outside of NSW. There have

been widely disparate estimates of the water balance of the Pilliga Sandstone aquifer system, with estimates of

recharge ranging over nearly two orders of magnitude. The most recent compilation and assessment given by

Wolfgang (2000) is based predominantly on chloride mass balance estimates and an approximate area of the

recharge zone and provides and estimate of recharge of 970 ML yr-1 (median ~6mm yr-1).

Recharge mechanisms in the GAB

Recharge mechanisms are generally a combination of widespread diffuse (or local) recharge and direct (or

localised) recharge. Recharge is though to occur via direct infiltration to the soil into the outcropping regions of

the Jurassic (J-) aquifers, downward hydraulic movement through aquifers above the J-aquifer where the

hydraulic conditions permit, direct recharge through ephemeral creeks and rivers, and recharge on mountain

block alluvial fan systems, particularly within the Coonamble Embayment. The relative importance of the

different recharge mechanisms will vary from place to place and given the very long residence time of

groundwater within the GAB.

Costed Recharge proposals

A series of recharge investigation proposals are presented in a hierarchical manner. These are as follows: a)

desktop study evaluation and analysis of existing information ($65 000) b) sampling of existing artesian bores

and new nested bores located near to proposed localised recharge sites ($350 000 - $600 000) c) detailed

unsaturated soil profiles and measurement of environmental tracers ($850 000). In additional to these site

specific studies, there would need to be parallel studies that can scale up the point estimates (using remote

sensing and GIS methods) as well as hydrological modelling.

Page 8: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

8

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope

Increasing demands on the limited availability of global water supplies has resulted in a dramatic increase in the

amount of studies focused on estimating groundwater recharge (eg., Gee and Hillel, 1988; Allison et al, 1994;

Scanlon et al, 2006), particularly in semi-arid and arid zones. This is largely because surface water resources are

scarce and unpredictable in dry areas and groundwater often provides the only reliable source of water for

consumptive use. In many semi-arid to arid zone aquifer systems around the world the groundwater is very old

and may have been recharged under a different climate than that of the present. As a result these systems contain

“fossil” water and groundwater exploitation may not be indefinitely sustainable under the current recharge

regime.

Whilst there have been some investigations to estimate recharge in the Great Artesian Basin (Radke et al., 2000;

Kellett et al., 2003), there is relatively little information about recharge to the western margin (Love et al., 2000)

nor the NSW portion of the Basin (Wolfgang, 2000; Brownbill, 2000). Increased demands on the GAB resources

through mining and irrigation, and the need to sustain the enterprises that depend on the water as well as protect

groundwater dependent ecosystems, means that a better estimate of recharge is seen as an important component

of sustainable water allocation and use within the GAB as a whole. This is clearly the situation in the western

margin of the GAB where groundwater recharge is estimated to be at least three times greater in the Pleistocene

compared to today (Love at al., 2000). This is also implicitly true for groundwater in the majority of the

Coonamble Embayment in NSW.

The project area for this review, as shown in Figure 1, is the western margin of the Great Artesian Basin,

stretching from near Woomera in South Australia, north, then north-east across the south-east of the Northern

Territory and into south-western Queensland and the Coonamble Embayment within the NSW portion of the

GAB. The recharge zones are those areas where the GAB aquifer either outcrops or where overlying aquifers

have higher head than the main GAB aquifer.

The report is organised according to the activities that are outlined in the project brief. Namely:

5. Literature review of recharge approaches and those studies carried out in the GAB to date;

6. Presentation of appropriate methods for quantification of recharge;

7. Costed proposal for priority recharge sites in NSW and the western GAB;

8. Report on the above activities.

1.2 Objectives

The objectives of this review as defined in the project brief are:

9. To provide conceptual models for the recharge mechanisms of the GAB;

Page 9: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

9

10. Advise on appropriate methodologies for the quantification of recharge;

11. Develop costed recharge investigation projects in NSW and the western GAB.

DUBBO

MACKAY

TAMWORTH

GLADSTONE

ROCKHAMPTON

ROMA

MOREE

COBAR

DALBY

MILES

MONTO

BOURKE

NYNGAN

MARREE

CEDUNA

TAROOM

BOULIA

WINTON

IVANHOE

WOOMERA

QUILPIE

BILOELA

EMERALD

MITCHELL

BLACKALL

WINDORAH

WILCANNIA

ST GEORGE

LONGREACH

HUGHENDEN

CUNNAMULLA

INNAMINCKAOODNADATTA

AUGATHELLA

BARCALDINE

BIRDSVILLE

BROKEN HILL

COOBER PEDY

GOONDIWINDI

CHARLEVILLE

PORT AUGUSTA

WHITE CLIFFS

THARGOMINDAH

ALICE SPRINGS

LIGHTNING RIDGE

Figure 1

Legend

Project Areas

Recharge Areas

Great Artesian Basin

Figure 1. Delineation of the project areas considered as part of this review. Also shown are the recharge areas of the Great Artesian Basin not investigated in this review (see Kellett, et al., 2003).

1.3 Recharge and sustainable yield

Estimates of recharge rates are arguably the most difficult component of the water budget to quantify (Scanlon

2004; Scanlon et al., 2006). This is even more so in semi-arid and arid environments where one is often dealing

with low water fluxes that vary considerable over both spatial and temporal scales. Estimation of recharge rates

and identification of the important recharge mechanisms are important for a number of reasons. These include

the following:

12. Recharge rates are often used as a benchmark for determining groundwater allocation volumes, where the

amount of water extracted is determined from a percentage of modern day recharge. Whilst it is

recognised that this policy is flawed, the concept of “safe-yield” determined from recharge rate alone

perpetuates in practice.

13. Following on from the above, there is a need to balance the demands of groundwater pumping whilst

maintaining groundwater dependent ecosystems (such as the GAB mound springs) and therefore

understanding all components of the water balance is required.

Page 10: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

10

14. Recharge rates are a critical input to numerical groundwater models that are used for developing

groundwater management policies in both time and space.

Just as important as estimating recharge is the need to predict the impact that groundwater extraction may have

on declining pressures and consequent reduced discharge to GAB Mound Springs. This requires:

Knowledge of magnitude, location and timing of groundwater extraction;

Measurements of the magnitude and location of natural recharge;

Measurement of the magnitude and location of natural discharge from the aquifer;

Determination of the degree to which each natural discharge will be reduced when the system reaches a

new balance, and the timescale over which this will occur.

Very large groundwater resources have usually evolved over thousands to hundreds of thousands of years.

Current recharge rates may be much less than in the past, and the water storage within the aquifer may be a

legacy from higher recharge rates that were prevalent during much wetter periods many tens to hundreds of

thousands of years ago. Discharge, on the other hand, is driven by head gradients, aquifer properties and their

configuration that determine flow rates. The change in discharge rate will rarely be in concert with recharge due

to the lag time (especially in the GAB) because of very large distance and complex flow systems that propagate

changes in rainfall to recharge and then through the aquifer.

Exploitation of such resources will invariably alter the balance between recharge and discharge, by adding a

discharge term and altering the head gradient. By definition, therefore, pumping or intercepting water and

discharging by artesian pressure has no relationship to current recharge rates in terms of maintaining a desired

water level or pressure in any given point. This can be explicitly defined by the water balance expression:

Volume = recharge – discharge = 0 at steady-state

or

Volume = recharge – (discharge + pumping) > 0

It is self evident that there will be a consequent reduction in storage, but the rate of decline will decrease over

time. Further, if exploitation is greater than the recharge rate, then eventually the water will be entirely depleted.

The real limitation, however, will be ingress of poorer quality water from aquitards or other adjacent aquifers, or

a drop in water pressure/level until the cost of pumping is prohibitive. In the case of the GAB, the amount of

water removed annually is a small fraction of total storage.

The total volume of water in the GAB is listed in the GABCC website (see references) as:

Total volume = 64 900 million ML (mega litres) or 6.5 x 1013 m3. Although the uncertainty is not given, one

would expect this number to have an error range of at least 1.5 x 1013 m3.

Estimated annual recharge in the Queensland intake beds of the GAB to the Hutton and Hooray sandstone

Page 11: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

11

aquifers is estimated to be 3.8 x 108 m3 yr-1, (Kellett et al., 2003). The amount of recharge to the Cadna-owie

formation is perhaps an additional 5-10% of this number [ibid]..

Total discharge is estimated as 9 ± 1.5 x 108 m3 yr-1, divided equally between natural discharge, by springs and

vertical leakage (4.5 ± 1 x 108 m3 yr-1) and bore discharge (4.5 ± 0.5 x 108 m3 yr-1)(Kellett et al., 2003). Of the

natural discharge, vertical leakage probably accounts for 90% of losses through upward leakage to phreatic

aquifers. Under ‘natural’ conditions, the ratio of storage to total discharge (6.5 x 1013 m3 divided by the natural

annual discharge of 4.5 x 108 m3 yr-1) yields a water residence time of about 1.44 x 105 years for the entire GAB.

Similarly, if we assume that bore discharge is about the same as natural discharge, the ratio of storage to total

discharge (6.5 x 1013 m3 divided by the annual discharge of 9 x 108 m3 yr-1) yields a residence time of about 7.22

x 104 years.

Even if the main pressurized J-K aquifers store 10% of the total water, and they are about 150 million years old,

then at least one thousand pore volumes of water have passed though the basin since deposition of the basin. The

fraction of bore discharge divided by the total storage volume = 7 x 10-6 which means that about 0.0007 percent

of the total storage is exploited every year. While this is a very small fraction of the total resources, the confined

nature of the aquifer results in considerable pressure head decline. Indeed, of 4900 bores that have been installed

since the 1860s, about 25% have ceased to flow (i.e., are now sub-artesian).

The most obvious surface manifestations of GAB artesian water are the more than 600 spring complexes that are

scattered through the Basin (GABCC, 1998). These support a unique flora and fauna in an otherwise arid

landscape. Some of the most notable and unique of these are the so-called mound springs in the SA portion of

the GAB which extend along a SE-NW transect from the edges of Lake Frome, near Innaminka, to the

remarkable Dalhousie Springs, which account for about 40% of all SA spring flow near Oodnadatta. It is

estimated that the springs have decreased in flow by about 30% since development of the basin and some have

dried out completely. In the Coonamble Embayment in NSW, there has been up to a 50 metre pressure head

decline (Brownbill, 2000).

If the maintenance of current or natural spring flows is desired, then the bore discharge rates up-gradient of these

systems need to be reduced, or eliminated, to restore pressure heads. The lag times in transfer of water pressure

through such a large system will be important in managing the resource from the point of view of these fragile

dependent ecosystems.

About 90% of the natural GAB discharge is thought to occur by diffuse upward leakage through the overlying

water tables, and ultimately by evaporation though the soil (GABCC, 1998). The rates of upward leakage

estimated for a portion of the basin in the southern part of Lake Eyre are 3 ± 1 mm yr-1 (Woods, 1990). The

interaction between the upward movement of GAB artesian water, and the overlying aquitards, aquifers and

surface water systems are not well known. There are numerous ephemeral and perennial streams, rivers and

water holes throughout the surface water catchment (e.g. Lake Eyre Basin in SA). The extent to which the GAB

leakage is connected to these is not well known.

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS

Page 12: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

12

2.1 Western margin

Mean annual rainfall in the western margin areas of the GAB is between 170 –220 mm/yr with mean relative

humidity around 40% in the SA portion. The region is relatively flat with gradual increase in elevation towards

the west (Fig. 2) with ephemeral surface drainage toward Lake Eyre to the east. Also shown in Figure 2 are

zones of aquifer outcrop as well as the extent of the artesian area and the approximate unconfined/confined

boundary.

Nomenclature of the main artesian aquifer along the western margin is yet to be resolved. The main aquifers

have been named as various units including the De Souza Sandstone, Algebuckina Formation, Cadna-owie

Formation and Hooray Sandstone. For the purpose of this review we name the main artesian aquifer as the J-K

as it contains units of both Jurassic and Cretaceous age.

The J-K aquifer comprises unconsolidated gravels, sands and silts and consolidated sandstones with inter-bedded

shales and mudstones (Habermehl, 1980; Habermehl & Lau, 1997). The aquifer ranges in thickness from

approximately 250m in SA up to 1,000m in the NT (Love at al., 2000, Matthews, 1997). Salinity of groundwater

varies considerable from 550 mg/L in the Finke River region to >3,500 mg/L along the southwest margin (Radke

et al 2000). The J-K aquifer outcrops in portions of the northwest and southwest of the study area as well as

adjacent to the Proterozoic inlier of the Peake and Dennison Ranges in the central portion of the study area (Fig.

2).

Page 13: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

13

Figure 2. Topography, aquifer outcrop and extent of the artesian region and unconfined/confined boundary for the western margin of the GAB. No data for NT portion for this map.

Overlying the J-K is the Bulldog Shale and its equivalent, the Rumbalara Shale, in the NT. These units form a

regional aquitard over much of the region and can reach a maximum thickness of 400 metres. A cross section of

the major units in the SA portion of the GAB is shown in a more detailed review of the geology and

hydrogeological units by Habermehl (1980) and references therein.

Page 14: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

14

The potentiometric surface (Fig. 3) indicates that the major direction of groundwater flow in the study area is

towards the south – east and east with hydraulic gradients ranging from 2 x 10-4 to 8 x 10-4. In the western

portion of the study area, the aquifer either outcrops, or is unconfined. Further east, the aquifer is confined by

the overlying Bulldog Shale and eventually becomes artesian. Minor discharge from the system occurs via a

series of springs to the south west of Lake Eyre. These springs are often associated with faulting. The majority of

discharge is by diffuse vertical leakage through the confining bed at the down flow end of the system where the

hydraulic gradient is favourable for upward leakage.

Figure 3. Location map of the south west margin of the Great Artesian Basin, showing location of sampling wells along the northern and southern transect as well as the potentiometric contours (denoted as AHD – Australian Height Datum). The dashed line representing the unconfined/confined boundary indicate where the standing water level in the aquifer is below the overlying Bulldog Shale (i.e, unconfined west of the boundary) or above the Shale (east of the boundary).

The predominant vegetation for the western area is saltbush, blue bush and Acacia (Fig. 4). The land-use in the

recharge zone of SA is a mixture of pastoral leases, Aboriginal freehold and nature conservation park, whilst in

the NT it is mainly pastoral leases and some Aboriginal freehold (Fig. 5).

Page 15: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

15

Figure 4. Natural vegetation map for the western margin of the GAB.

Page 16: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

16

Figure 5. Land use and tenure for the western margin of the GAB.

Page 17: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

17

2.2 Coonamble Embayment

The Coonamble Embayment lies in the NSW portion of the GAB and is located west of the Warrumbungle

mountain range (Fig. 6). The area of the GAB that is within NSW is ~207 000 km2 (~11% of GAB).The general

topography declines from 300m in the eastern portion at the foot of the Warrumbungles to ~125m at Carinda in

the north-west part of the area (Fig. 7). The main aquifer, the Jurassic Pilliga sandstone, outcrops at higher

elevations further to the east (250m to 600m). Most of the surficial cover in the area is classified as

undifferentiated Quaternary cover.

The climate is described by Wolfgang (2000) as sub-humid to semi-arid. Rainfall is ~900mm yr-1 in the SE part

(uplands) to <400 mm yr-1 in the north-west. In general, rainfall is 450 – 550 mm yr -1 throughout most of the

area, dominated slightly by summer rainfall but also with significant winter falls. Rainfall trends show a

markedly drier first half of 20th century compared to the 2nd half of the century as is commonly observed in SE

Australia (Bureau of Meteorology data: http://bom.gov.au). Annual potential evapotranspiration (PET) ranges

from 1300mm in the east to 2000mm in the western area.

The area considered incorporates the Bogan-Macquarie and Castlereagh catchments of northern NSW; part of

the larger Darling Basin. These areas include development for cotton, grazing, and other cropping systems. The

region includes the Ramsar-listed Macquarie marshes. Wolfgang, 2000 describes a conceptual model for

recharge to the this portion of the GAB as via the Pilliga sandstone aquifer along the western slopes of the Great

Dividing Range through alluvial fans on the Warrumbungle Ranges in the south and eastern portions of the

Coonamble Embayment. Groundwater moves in a north and north-westerly direction along a low gradient (Fig.

7), with Darcy flow rates range from 0.1 m/yr to 0.8 m/yr. Discharge is thought to be predominantly within an

area of mound springs, many of which are extinct, located at the western edge of the embayment. It is not clear

whether the mound springs were active prior to development of the basin after the late 1800s. The interaction

between the Pilliga sandstone aquifer and other groundwater and surface water systems is unknown.

The geological model for the GAB system in this area as outlined by Wolfgang (2000) is as follows:

15. The aquifer is within an alluvial fan splaying out from the Warrumbungle Ranges towards the west

16. Recharge is predominantly within the easterly portion of the region

17. The flow regime is isolated from the rest of the GAB

18. Discharge is to the overlying aquifers at the west of the embayment

The commonly expressed view is that the Coonamble Embayment is an isolated part of the GAB. That is,

recharge and discharge occurs within the embayment and little water if any flows outside to the other States

(Brownbill, 2000).

The soils are described by Sleeman and Downes (1950) as brown – reddish-brown surface, of light-medium

texture with red – red-brown subsoil and CaCO3 concretions. They are highly weathered and leached (Taylor,

1994). Natural vegetation in the upper catchment is eucalypt hardwood forests. In lower elevations: Yellow box;

red gum; she-oak and introduced willows (Downes and Sleeman, 1955). Further west is savannah swamp and

some mallee and red gum on the floodplains. Land clearing of native vegetation commenced in late 1880s in the

Page 18: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

18

low lying areas immediately west of the Ranges. There has been a significant shift from dryland to irrigation

farming that occurred in the 1960s – 70s. The predominant current land-use is dryland cropping (wheat),

pastures and irrigated cotton and also some oats and barley. The total agricultural area ~ 8,250,000 ha.

Figure 6. Map showing the inferred recharge zone within the Coonamble Embayment (after DWR as cited in Brownbill, 2000).

The first artesian bores were drilled in the late 1880s and a number of weirs were constructed along the

Macquarie River in the 1890s. The early 1900s saw rapid increase in the rate of development. Major land

clearing in the eastern and southern portion may have caused rising water tables and dryland salinity and stream

bank erosion (Wolfgang, 2000).

One of the first major overview papers on the NSW portion of the GAB was published by Abbott (1884). He

showed that the flow systems in the Jurassic aquifers are recharged directly through outcrops in the eastern

highlands of Queensland and flow in a westerly to SW direction. It also showed a distinct hydrochemical

character, with bicarbonate dominated waters in the flow systems emanating from the eastern part of the Basin.

There has been an estimate pressure loss over 80% of the NSW portion of the GAB and now <50% of the total

NSW portion of the GAB has artesian pressures (Brownbill, 2000). Decrease in pressure had already been

noticed in 1893. The pressure head near the recharge zone, west of the Warrumbungle Ranges was ~200m (pre

1910) and had declined to ~160m by the mid 1980s (Fig. 8). In the north-west part of Coonamble Embayment

the pressure head has fallen from 150m to 130m while in the south-eastern the decline is from 230m to 160m.

The greatest rate of change was observed from 1900-1920. There are estimated to be ~6000 bores in the entire

area in both the phreatic and artesian systems (Fig. 8). Mean pressure from the Pilliga Sandstone aquifer had

dropped from 180m to 145m by 1935, followed by a relatively slow decline since then to the present.

The chemical composition of the Pilliga sandstone aquifer is Na+-HCO3- type. This is similar to other eastern

Page 19: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

19

margin flow-paths, and salinity ranges from 1000 – 1600 EC (Wolfgang, 2000). Total dissolved solids (TDS)

increase from 500 – 700 mg/L west of Warrumbungle Ranges to higher TDS in the NW. The shallow aquifer

salinity tends to be higher than that of the Pilliga sandstone (Radke et al., 2000).

Figure 7. Map showing the geological formations, topography and present day potentiometric head of the Pilliga sandstone within the Coonamble Embayment (after Wolfgang, 2000)

Page 20: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

20

Figure 8. Shaded areas show the extent of flowing bores in the NSW portion of the GAB in 1920 and 1995.

Page 21: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

21

3. LITERATURE REVIEW OF RECHARGE MECHANISMS

3.1 Overview

Over the past 20 years there has been a rapid increase in the number of papers on groundwater recharge in the

literature. The need to know recharge rates is driven by such things as the need for improved water resource

management, better defining the extent and transport of groundwater contamination and the safe disposal of

nuclear waste in underground repositories. As a result of these activities there are now text books dedicated to

recharge studies (Simmers 1988 & 1997, Sharma 1989, Lerner et al., 1990, Robbins 1998, Zhang 1998, Hogan

et al., 2004) as well as a number of review articles in the international literature (Scanlon et al., 2002, Scanlon et

al., 2006 and references therein). In the following review we examine the previous literature and its potential

application to the Great Artesian Basin.

Australia has the most variable and unpredictable rainfall pattern of any continent on earth (Pigram 2006). This

large variation of rainfall in both time and space has resulted in groundwater recharge varying temporally and

spatially. This variability is particularly pronounced in the semi-arid and arid regions of the continent. The

development of a number of geochemical and isotopic techniques that attempt to integrate different spatial and

temporal scales (Hogan et al 2004) are often the only reliable techniques in regions where low net water fluxes

dominate.

In this review we firstly examine the background information required to develop a conceptual model of

recharge mechanisms in the study area. This is followed by a brief examination of the water budget equation as it

applies to many recharge studies. We then present a brief overview of environmental tracers as they are widely

applied in all areas of recharge investigations. The review is then organised into surface water, soil water (the

unsaturated zone) and groundwater (the saturated zone). We discuss a variety of both physical and chemical

techniques for estimating recharge. We deliberately place greater emphasis on the chemical and isotopic

approaches as they can integrate over larger scales and are more relevant for the sub-humid to semi-arid regions

of the GAB intake areas.

The first stage of any recharge investigation requires the collection of existing data. This is important for two

primary reasons:

19. To develop an initial conceptual model of recharge process, and

20. Provide a range of what the likely recharge rates might be.

These two factors have important implications for the selection of which recharge techniques should be used in

any study. As discussed by many previous authors, there is a need to have an idea of what the answer may be

before we can design a recharge study. This is critical for the selection of recharge technique. For example, some

techniques, such as artificial tracers, only work well in high rainfall areas; lysimeters, that measure the actual

water movement through a soil profile, are expensive, difficult to construct and require regular field visits for

monitoring and are not considered suitable for remote areas of the GAB. In contrast, environmental tracers are a

more useful technique in arid and semi-arid regions.

Page 22: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

22

Background information is used to assess the potential controls on recharge rates and mechanisms. Useful

information to collate includes: topography, geology, geomorphology, soil type, rainfall, evaporation,

transpiration, vegetation, and land-use. The better the conceptual model of the hydrology and hydrogeology in a

region, then the better the accuracy and precision of recharge estimates. Whilst the use of a good

hydrogeological conceptualisation to guide and help the recharge assessment seems obvious, it has been ignored

in many previous studies. Basic hydrogeological data should include: depth to the water table, or hydraulic

head, groundwater chemistry and geological constraints, such as folds and faults. Basic conceptualisations can

then include:, water table and potentiometric surfaces, aquifer type and aquifer geometry. When the existing data

is complied a conceptual hydrogeological model of groundwater recharge can be developed, as well as

preliminary estimates of what the recharge rate may be.

It is important to clarify a number of terms regarding recharge, used in this report:

Infiltration is the amount of water per unit area that enters the soil profile over a given time period.

Deep drainage is the amount of water per unit area that moves vertically downwards below the zone of evapo-

transpiration (or root zone) over a given period of time.

Recharge is the amount of water per unit area that reaches the aquifer over a given period of time.

Diffuse recharge is defined as recharge derived from precipitation that occurs fairly uniformly across the

landscape (Scanlon et al 2002). It is the recharge that enters the water table resulting from deep drainage.

Localised Recharge is the recharge that results from run-off, streams and lakes where water moves laterally to

the point where it recharges. This includes recharge from ephemeral rivers.

Mountain Block Recharge describes the contribution of mountains regions to the recharge of adjacent aquifers

(Wilson and Guan 2004).

3.2 Comparison of Recharge Techniques

3.2.1 Water Balance Techniques

The water budget equation can be used in all recharge studies, whether for surface water, unsaturated or

saturated zones. In its simplest form the water budget equation is expressed as:

inflow = outflow change in storage.

Specifically, in terms of recharge:

ROETPR (1)

Page 23: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

23

Where: R = recharge, P = precipitation, ET = evapotranspiration and RO = runoff. The water balance technique

often estimates recharge by the residual difference of the estimates of P, ET and RO. The difficulty of this

approach is that it relies on accurate measurements of the other components in the water budget equation. Some

authors suggest that this difference technique is not particularly useful in semi-arid and arid regions because the

values of recharge would be smaller than the errors associated with measurements of P, ET and RO (Gee and

Hillel 1988, Hendrix and Walker 1997).

Another major limitation of the technique is the temporal scale over which the water balance is applied. If one

uses average annual values of P and ET it is easy to see from Equation 1 that no recharge would occur in the arid

zone as (ET >> P). As a result this approach using large time steps dampens out extreme precipitation events that

may cause recharge. In the arid zone, recharge is most likely to occur from very large events, where P >> E. If

measurements were taken daily, the water budget technique may offer some promise, particularly in zones of

ephemeral recharge from creeks.

3.2.2 Environmental Tracers

A very brief overview of environmental tracers is presented below. The objective here is to provide the reader

with background information before a discussion of the separate recharge techniques for the various hydrological

zones. Environmental tracers are “natural, or anthropogenic, compounds, or isotopes, that are widely distributed

in the near-surface environment of the Earth, such that variations in their abundances can be used to determine

pathways and timescales of environmental processes” (Cook and Bohlke, 2000).

Fundamental to recharge studies is an appreciation of the age of groundwaters that can then constrain the rate of

recharge. There are a number of environmental tracers that can be used as tools to estimate the age of water in

the unsaturated and saturated zones. These include:

a) Radioactive tracers;

b) Accumulating tracers; and,

c) Event Markers.

Radioactive tracers are naturally-occurring radioactive tracers have been used extensively over the past 30 years

to provide information on residence time and groundwater flow rates. The groundwater age is calculated by the

expression:

0

1 lnC

Ct

(2)

where t = time since water entered the saturated zone, C and C0 are the measured and initial concentration of the

radioactive isotope and is the decay constant. The most commonly used tracers in regional scale groundwater

systems are 14C with a half life of 5,730 years and 36Cl with a half life of 301,000 years.

Page 24: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

24

Accumulating tracers increase in concentrations with increasing residence times. The most commonly used

accumulating tracer is 4He which has a very low initial concentration that increases with time due to release of 4He by alpha decay of uranium and thorium decay-series isotopes within the aquifer matrix. Often such a tracer

provides only semi–quantitative information on the groundwater residence time.

In rare cases, chemical species can be used as accumulating tracers if their accumulation rates in the sub-surface

can be quantified. Recently, Purtschert et al (2007) have applied the in-situ, sub-surface production rate of 39Ar

to estimate recharge rates in fractured rock aquifers in the Clare Valley of South Australia.

Event markers are elevated levels of a particular tracers injected into the environment as a result of

anthropogenic activities in the past. Such activities include contaminant spills or atmospheric nuclear weapons

testing. Commonly used event makers include 36Cl, 3H, 14C and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The presence of an

event marker in a parcel of water indicates that it was recharged at a particular time. Event markers can be used

both in unsaturated and saturated zones and have been used to estimate recharge rates during the last 50 years.

Conservative tracers such as Cl- and Br- have wide application in the hydrological field. Many studies have used

Cl- to estimate recharge (see below). Bromide is often used as an applied tracer in recharge studies.

3.3 Surface Water Techniques

The role that surface water plays in groundwater recharge depends upon the interconnection between the two

water bodies. Throughout most of the GAB, the potentiometric head is upwards and as a result no recharge from

the surface water bodies is possible. There is the potential, however, for groundwater recharge from surface

water bodies in the recharge zones of the GAB, where the aquifer is outcropping, or unconfined. A number of

ephemeral, braided streams cross the potential recharge zones of both the Western Margin and Coonamble

Embayment.

3.3.1 Estimation of ephemeral stream recharge

Historically, ephemeral recharge has been estimated from channel loss between gauging stations. This approach,

however, does not allow for the uptake of water by riparian vegetation. The recharge rate, R, for a channel reach

can be estimated using the water budget equation. This approach assumes that recharge equals channel

transmission losses less the abstraction of water from evaporation in the channel and transpiration (Goodrich et

al 2004):

STEPQQQR Li 1 (3)

where, Qi and Q1 are measured flow at gauging stations at the inflow and outflow of the reach; QL is lateral,

overland and tributary flow; P is direct precipitation; E is evaporation; T is transpiration and S is chance in

storage.

The importance of ephemeral stream recharge on the basin scale depends upon the size of the landscape

occupied by streams. For example, if we assume that diffuse recharge is 10 mm/y, and that the stream recharge

Page 25: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

25

features cover 1% of land area, then to be comparable, recharge through stream bed features must be 1,000

mm/yr. Alternatively, if the streams occupy 10% of the landscape then recharge through the stream bed must be

100 mm/yr. As is evident from the above example, the two important factors for basin scale recharge from

streams are the amount of diffuse recharge and the geographical size of the streams in comparison to the zones of

diffuse recharge.

3.3.2 Hydraulic and Geophysical approach.

Another method to estimate groundwater recharge under localized zones such as ephemeral creeks is to estimate

recharge from the shape of any mounding of the water table. This is a useful approach in areas where there is a

lack of well coverage. A number of techniques have been applied in the desert environments of the southwest

USA, including: gravity, electromagnetic induction and ground penetrating radar (Hogan et al 2004). Electrical

topographic methods have the advantage of being able to trace water movement in 2 and 3 dimensions and

maybe very useful for evaluating focused recharge beneath ephemeral streams. If a groundwater mound can be

established, an estimate of recharge can be achieved by using the groundwater mound equation of Hantush

(1967).

3.3.3 Stable Isotopes

Natural variations in the stable isotopes of the water molecule (18O/16O and 2H/1H) can provide valuable

information on the source and history of water in the hydrologic cycle (Clark and Fritz, 1997). The primary

advantage of stable isotopes is that as part of the water molecule they trace the actual movement of water. In

contrast, when one uses a solute to infer water transport one assumes that the tracers either moves with the water,

or corrections need to be made for dispersion, diffusion and any chemical interactions.

Although rarely used to estimate recharge rates, the stable isotopes of water have been shown to be particularly

useful in distinguishing different recharge mechanisms in arid and semi-arid zones (Coplen et al., 2000 and

references therein). Both unsaturated and saturated water in arid zones often display enrichment in stable

isotopes of the water molecule due to evaporation in the upper few meters of the soil zone. These will tend to

plot to the right of a Meteoric Water Line (MWL) on a stable isotope plot, indicating evaporation. In contrast,

localised recharge from flood events through ephemeral streams often has a more depleted signature indicative

of more direct recharge as it by-passes the zone of evaporation. These waters will not only be more depleted, but

will plot closer to the MWL. In ideal situations the relative proportion of localised recharge versus diffuse

recharge can be determined by simple mixing calculations.

An example of stable isotope data in an arid zone groundwater system in central Australia (Fig. 9) shows that the

groundwaters tend to plot to the right of the local meteoric water line (in this case represented by local rainfall).

Evapo-transpiration in the upper part of the soil zone causes this trend and is typical of groundwater in semi-arid

and arid zones. The stable isotope compositions also tend to be considerably more negative than that of mean

annual rainfall and indicate recharge is primarily from episodic high rainfall events as a result of summer

dominated tropical storms. These data could also represent rainfall from past cooler and wetter climates, such

data, however, would tend to plot closer to the meteoric water line. This will be discussed for the GAB system in

sections 4.1 and 4.2.

Page 26: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

26

Figure 9. Stable isotope data plot for an arid region of Australia (Ti-Tree basin, NT) showing the relationship between amount of rainfall and isotopic composition. The extrapolated groundwater trend shows that recharge occurs predominantly from high rainfall events, indicative of monsoonal systems (Harrington, 1997).

3.4 Unsaturated zone

3.4.1 Darcy’s law

Unsaturated zone techniques to estimate recharge rates are often used where the unsaturated zone is relatively

thick, such as in arid and semi-arid regions. Detailed reviews of unsaturated zone techniques can be found in Gee

and Hillel (1988), Zhang (1998), Scanlon et al (1997; 2006). In essence, unsaturated zone techniques estimate

the drainage rate below the root zone and provide a point estimate of recharge. Unsaturated techniques can also

provide information on temporal variability. They generally do not provide detailed information on spatial

variability.

It is important to note that unsaturated techniques actually measure deep drainage and not recharge. It is often

assumed that this deep drainage will reach the water table and become recharge. This assumes vertical flow only

beneath the root zone. This assumption is not always correct, however, due to heterogeneity in the unsaturated

zone. For example, a sandy horizon overlying a low permeability clay has the potential to perch water and result

in lateral flow.

Physical methods for estimating water fluxes in semi–arid and arid zones are generally very difficult to apply

because water fluxes are very low. Chemical tracers have an advantage over physical methods as they can

provide information on both current and historical recharge rates. Both physical and chemical techniques are

used for determining soil water velocities, which can then be related to drainage rates and, ultimately, recharge

rates. A number of unsaturated zone techniques, such as lysimeters and applied tracers, have limited application

Page 27: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

27

to the GAB and are not discussed here (see Scanlon et al 1999 and Scanlon 2004 for detailed reviews).

Darcy’s Law can be used to calculate recharge, R, in the unsaturated zone using the following (Scanlon 2004):

1

dz

dhKzh

dz

dK

dz

dHKR

(4)

Where K() is the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at the ambient water content , H is the total head, h is the

matric pressure head and z is the elevation. In thick, unsaturated zones with a porous medium the matric

pressure gradient is often close to zero and drainage is driven by gravity (Scanlon, 2004). Under this scenario the

total head gradient can be assumed to be unity, negating the need to measure the matric pressure gradient. One of

the main limitations to using Darcy’s Law in the unsaturated zone, however, is that it requires accurate

measurements of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Scanlon (2004) concluded that considering problems with

sample disturbance, drying and spatial variability the method has a limited applicability to recharge rates of 20

mm/yr or higher. The recharge rates for much of the GAB intake areas are estimated to be <20 mm/yr, therefore

this technique has limited use here.

3.4.2 Chloride Mass Balance

The Chloride Mass Balance (CMB) technique has been used extensively over the past 40 years to estimate

recharge rates in both humid and arid climates (Fig. 10). The technique is suitable for both the unsaturated and

saturated zones (see Scanlon et al, 1997; Herczeg and Edmunds, 2000 for comprehensive review). As water,

containing chloride, enters the soil zone, water is lost by transpiration from plants and evaporation leaving

residual Cl- in the soil water. Thus, the concentration of Cl- is proportional to the amount of water removed.

Below the root zone the chloride signature is transported to the water table. In humid regions, with high

downward water fluxes, the Cl- concentration is relatively constant below the root zone. In contrast in arid zones

with low water fluxes the Cl- concentration below the root zone will be balanced by the downward moving Cl- in

the soil water against any diffusive flux across the unsaturated/ saturated boundary.

In the following we combine the basic water balance equation (Equation 5) to include the solute Cl- (Equation

6):

QREP (5)

rivswpptn QClRClEClPCl (6)

Clpptn, Clsw and Clro refer to Cl concentration in precipitation, soil water and runoff respectively and Q is runoff.

Here we assume that Cl- is neither gained, nor lost, from weathering or anthropogenic impacts. Note that this

equation applies equally to the unsaturated and saturated zones. In the saturated zone the chloride concentration

in soil water is replaced by Cl- concentration in groundwater at the top of the water table.

In many arid areas surface runoff, Q, is not significant and, assuming there are no other source or sinks of Cl-,

then recharge maybe estimated from Equation 7:

Page 28: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

28

sw

pptn

Cl

ClPR

(7)

rainfall

evaporation

recharge

transpiration

run off

Modified from Val SnowModified from Val Snow

Natural water balance

Figure 10. Schematic diagram, showing the hydrological balance for the conceptual, one-dimensional recharge system for using the chloride mass balance technique.

This equation is applicable to both the unsaturated and saturated zones. In the unsaturated zone, however, we

measure deep drainage and not recharge. This technique has been used extensively in semi-arid and arid zones

because it can measure recharge at low water fluxes. Water fluxes as low as 0.05 mm/yr have been measured in

the arid zone of Australia (Allison and Hughes 1983, Cook et al 1994).

If the interest is in establishing a chronological history of recharge, then in addition to measuring Cl-

concentrations, measurements of 36Cl and 2H and 18O should be obtained. CMB in the unsaturated zone

provides point estimates of recharge, but over large temporal scales. Examples of ideal chloride profiles, shown

in Fig. 11, are for situations of varying groundwater chloride concentration and depth to water table. One can

also use the data to evaluate changes in recharge rate with time if cumulative [Cl-] and water content are plotted

(Fig. 12).

Page 29: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

29

Figure 11. Schematic diagram showing different soil water chloride profiles under conditions of a fresh water table (a); saline water table (b) and diffusion to a very deep fresh water table (c) (after Phllips, 2000).

Figure 12. Cumulative soil water profiles for different land elements showing changes in recharge rates where there is a break in slope (after Leaney et al., 1999).

3.4.3 Event Markers

The most commonly used event markers in the unsaturated zone are 3H and 36Cl. Chlorine-36 has a half-life of

301,000 years and is primarily produced in the atmosphere via cosmic ray spallation of argon-40. Tritium (3H) is

the radioactive isotope of hydrogen, has a half-life of 12.43 years, and is also produced in the atmosphere, by the

Page 30: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

30

bombardment of nitrogen by the flux of neutrons in cosmic radiations. In the 1950s and 1960s thermonuclear

testing caused a large increase in the concentration of 3H and 36Cl in precipitation. This has resulted in these

isotopes being excellent markers in the hydrological cycle for recharge events in the last 50 years. The peak

concentration of these event markers in the unsaturated zone can be used to estimate groundwater from Equation

8:

t

zvR

(8)

where v is the tracer velocity, z is the depth to the peak of the tracer concentration, t is time difference

between the tracer the peak of the tracer fallout in the atmosphere and the time of sampling, and is the average

water content above the tracer peak.

A limitation to this technique in semi arid zones is potential low water fluxes, which can result in the peak

concentrations not being transported past the root zone. This technique, however, may have applications in zones

of localised recharge in arid zones due to potentially larger water fluxes.

3.5 Saturated Zone Techniques

3.5.1 Darcy’s Law

Many of the unsaturated zone techniques provide only point estimates of recharge. In contrast, saturated

techniques have the potential to integrate over much larger spatial scales. Furthermore, saturated techniques have

the advantage in that we are measuring water that has actually reached the water table. Darcy’s Law can be used

to estimate groundwater recharge by relating the groundwater flow rate through a cross-sectional area of the

aquifer to the surface area that contributes to recharge. Darcy’s Law (Equation 4, above) states that, in saturated

media, the groundwater flux (q) is equal to the product of hydraulic conductivity (K) and hydraulic gradient (i):

Kiq (9)

The groundwater flux, q, can then be converted to a recharge rate from the following:

AS

qAR

(10)

where, R = recharge, q = groundwater flux A = cross sectional area of aquifer, and SA = surface area that

contributes to flow. The method assumes steady flow with minimal pumping. The cross-sectional area should be

aligned such that the groundwater flow direction is normal to the water table contours. The method suffers

significantly from reliable estimates of hydraulic conductivity, which can vary by several orders of magnitude.

Considering the natural variation in hydraulic conductivity and the difficulty in scaling up regional scale values

of hydraulic conductivity, the method at best would provide order of magnitude estimates of recharge.

3.5.2 Groundwater Hydrographs

Variations in groundwater hydrographs can provide valuable information on the timing and amount of recharge

Page 31: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

31

(see Healey and Cook (2002) for a comprehensive review). The rise of groundwater levels in an unconfined

aquifer is an indication of a recharge event. Often referred to as the water table fluctuation method (WTF)

recharge can be estimated from Equation 11:

t

hSR Y

(11)

where Sy is the specific yield and h/t is the change in height of the water table over a certain period of time.

The largest uncertainty is the estimation of specific yield, which can vary considerably and is difficult to

measure. Many previous applications of the technique use specific yield values for various lithologies from text

book examples. Another disadvantage of the method is that it cannot account for lateral flow. Under certain

situations, however, groundwater hydrographs can provide a rapid estimate of recharge before applying more

sophisticated technology. This method has the advantage that it actually estimates change in recharge over time

of the hydrograph record. As the method represents an integration of deep drainage by porous media and by-pass

flow it can integrate over large spatial scales. This method is best applied to shallow water tables that display

sharp water-level rises and declines. In areas of low water fluxes and a deep water table, there is a long delay, up

to 105 years, for current soil water infiltration to reach the water table. Under these situations the hydrograph

technique is not very useful.

3.5.3 Groundwater age dating

Age dating of groundwater can be used for determining groundwater velocities, which in certain situations can

sometimes be related to recharge rates. The main advantage of using groundwater dating techniques is that they

can provide information about the groundwater systems over time scales ranging from 10 to > 500,000 years.

This is a powerful advantage over hydraulic techniques that provides information on the potential groundwater

flow regime operating today and does not provide any temporal information. Furthermore, groundwater ages

have the advantage of not relying on estimates of hydraulic conductivity that can vary by many orders of

magnitudes in groundwater systems. The following section summarizes the work of Vogel (1967), Appelo and

Postma (1993) and Cook and Bohlke (1999). The principle of age dating relies on using a suitable radionuclide

or anthropogenic tracer that has a half-life (or accumulation time) commensurate with the groundwater residence

time (Fig. 13).

Page 32: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

32

Figure 13. A list of various groundwater dating methods and the approximate time intervals for which they are valid.

3.5.4 Unconfined aquifers

In the following we consider a unconfined aquifer receiving uniform recharge, R, with constant thickness, H,

constant porosity, , and uniform horizontal velocity with depth, bounded below by an impermeable aquiclude

(Figure 14). The vertical and horizontal distances travelled by a parcel of water entering the aquifer are related

by Equation 12:

zH

H

x

x

o

(12)

Where, xo is the location where the water parcel enters the unconfined aquifer, x is the horizontal distance and z

is the vertical distance of travel.

time (years)

10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108

3He/3H

226Ra14C

36Clfreons, SF6

85Kr

3H

39Ar

81Kr4He

40Ar/36Ar

Page 33: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

33

Figure 14. Conceptual flow paths under two recharge scenarios (a) constant recharge over the entire landscape and (b) preferential recharge over an unconfined aquifer becoming confined down-gradient.

The age of the groundwater, t, can be calculated from the following

zH

H

R

Ht ln

(13)

In this case the groundwater age, t, will increase from zero at the water table (z = 0) to infinite at the base of the

aquifer (z = H). The vertical component of groundwater velocity will decrease from R/ at the water table (z = 0)

to zero at the base of the aquifer. It is interesting to note that in this simplified system that the groundwater

isochrones are horizontal.

If the groundwater age is measured at a discrete depth then the recharge rate can be estimated from,

zH

H

t

HR ln

(14)

In relatively thick, unconfined aquifers, and if the groundwater is sampled close to the water table, such that z/H

is small, then the horizontal component of groundwater flow will be small and the recharge rate can be estimated

from the following expression.

t

zR

(15)

3.5.5 Confined Aquifers

Here we build upon the previous model and consider an unconfined aquifer that becomes confined down

gradient (Fig. 14B). In the unconfined portion the aquifer receives uniform recharge, R, and receives no recharge

in the confined portion of the aquifer. The aquifer is of constant thickness, H, and constant porosity, , and

bounded below by an impermeable aquiclude. In the confined portion, the aquifer is also bounded above by an

Page 34: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

34

impermeable aquiclude. In this scenario, the groundwater flow lines will be convex downward, as in the

unconfined example above, until they reach the unconfined – confined boundary, where the flow lines will

become horizontal. The isochrones in the unconfined portion of the aquifer will be constant and horizontal. In

the confined portion, however, the isochrones will become concave upwards towards the top aquiclude

boundary. In this situation groundwater ages will increase with distance along the flowline. If samples are

obtained from the same depth, then the horizontal groundwater flow velocity can be determined from

groundwater ages between two wells along a flow path.

12

12

tt

xxvh

(6)

Where vh = horizontal velocity, x2 –x1 is the horizontal distance between the wells and t2 – t1 is the age difference

between the two wells. As discussed by Cook and Bohlke (2000), the horizontal velocity is directly proportional

to the length of the recharge area and the recharge rate, and inversely proportional to the height and porosity of

the aquifer such that:

x

HhR v

(17)

The advantage of calculating recharge rates from horizontal flow velocities is that there is less reliance on

obtaining an accurate initial isotopic value of the recharging water.

3.5.6 Chloride Mass Balance

The principles of the chloride mass balance approach were discussed previously. As with the unsaturated zone,

CMB can be used to calculate recharge from Equation 7. Eriksson & Khunakasem (1969) was the first published

study to use chloride mass balance to calculate recharge to groundwater, from the coastal plain of Israel. Since

that time this method was had wide application in groundwater studies in both humid and arid zones (See

Scanlon and Cook 2002 and reference therein).

The main advantage of using CMB in the saturated zone is that recharge can be estimated over larger spatial

scales. Furthermore, if water residence times are known then recharge can be determined over larger temporal

scales. A potential limitation of using this technique are additional sources of chloride in the subsurface,

resulting in minimum calculated recharge rates. This chloride may come from diffusion of chloride through

aquitards, or the addition of Cl- from the dissolution of halite. Dissolution of halite can be easily checked by

using the ratio of bromide to chloride. Bromide is sparingly incorporated into halite minerals during

precipitation; groundwater that has dissolved halite will evolve to a very low bromide to chloride ratio as

dissolution progresses.

Cook and Bohlke (2000) have shown that for unconfined aquifers, if the Cl- concentrations change along the

direction of groundwater flow and if they can be attributed to changes in the concentration of recharge, then

recharge can be estimated from the following:

x

Hv

c

cc

c

PCR P

2

12

2

(18)

Page 35: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

35

In the above, R is the recharge rate; Cp is the concentration of Cl- in precipitation; P is the annual precipitation; c1

and c2 are the Cl- concentrations measured from two wells along a flow line separated by a distance x; v is the

mean groundwater velocity between these two points; H is the aquifer thickness and is the porosity.

3.5.7 Modelling

Theoretically, groundwater modelling can be used to estimate recharge over a wide range of spatial and temporal

scales. Application of numerical models to recharge estimation, however, should be treated with extreme

caution. If the prime objective of an investigation is to estimate recharge it is far more accurate to measure

recharge directly through other methods than to estimate it indirectly from modelling applications.

In principal, groundwater models use an inversion approach to back calculate recharge. Model calibration using

hydraulic head data alone provides an estimate of the ratio of recharge to hydraulic conductivity. Considering the

very large variation in hydraulic conductivity in the sub surface this approach is not recommended. It has been

shown, however, that the use of groundwater age dating incorporated into models can better constrain the

recharge value (Sanford et al., 2004).

3.6 Groundwater Age of the Great Artesian Basin waters

Calculations of groundwater age in the GAB, and its conversion to groundwater flow rates is important for a

number of reasons including, but not limited to:

(1) It provides the basis of a conceptual model of system behaviour, and horizontal flow rates should be

compared to recharge and discharge rates to determine the relative water budget of the GAB; and (2)

Groundwater flow rates provide critical input into numerical models.

Estimating groundwater age in such a large system as the GAB is not straightforward as there is often a myriad

of assumptions required, no matter what approach is used. The two most common techniques to estimate

groundwater age are the application of Darcy’s Law and groundwater dating techniques using natural

environmental tracers. Darcy’s Law requires estimates of both hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic gradient.

Estimates of hydraulic conductivity are difficult due to a number of reasons including: sparse array of wells;

scaling up to regional values and corrections for the affects of partial penetration. Furthermore, estimate of the

potentiometric surface only represents hydraulic conditions today and does not reflect the groundwater flow

system under past climatic conditions where it is likely that the majority of recharged occurred.

There are only two suitable natural radionuclides for dating old groundwater in a system the size of the GAB: 81Kr and 36Cl. 81Kr has a half-life of 2.3 x 105 yr and been proposed as the ideal tracer isotope for dating old

water (Lehmann et al., 2003). Unfortunately, the use of this isotope is only in its development stage and is

currently not available for commercial application. Chlorine-36 has a half life of 3.01 ± 0.04 x 105 years and is

produced primarily in the atmosphere via cosmic ray spallation of argon-40. Because of its hydrophilic nature, it

is thought to be an ideal tracer to date groundwater on timescales of up to 1.5 x106 years, provided that sources

and sinks of 36Cl and stable Cl can be accounted for. The advantage of using 36Cl is that the chloride anion

behaves conservatively, where, in the absence of any Cl- bearing mineral such as halite, it is neither added, nor

removed, from solution via water rock interaction and moves at approximately the same velocity of the water.

Page 36: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

36

Although 36Cl and Cl- concentrations may be modified after recharge by mixing with other aquifers, or by

diffusion from adjacent aquitards within a system, these problems may be overcome by incorporating

supplementary chemical and isotopic data to account for these added contributions. The reader is referred to

Love et al., (2000) who provide a detailed discussion of the relative importance of Cl- accession via rainfall and

acquitard diffusion, as well as a methodology to account for the different sources and sinks of 36Cl and Cl- and

appropriate modifications to the radioactive decay equation.

Flow rates are determined from both hydraulic calculations (Darcy’s law) and from 36Cl measurements. They

range from 0.2 m yr-1 to 5 m yr-1, with higher rates being recorded in the up-gradient parts in the Queensland

flow systems (2 – 5 m yr-1) , and the lower rates recorded in the western flow systems emanating from the SA

part of the basin and flowing westwards (0.2 – 0.5 m yr-1). The flow rates derived from the above methods are

complementary. The hydraulic age is determined from the current hydraulic gradient and a mean hydraulic

conductivity, while the isotopic age records a mean flow rate over the entire history of the flow systems, but is

subject to modification of the isotopic concentration and also subject to large errors.

Page 37: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

37

4. REVIEW OF EXISTING RECHARGE STUDIES IN THE GAB

Despite its obvious importance there are very few detailed recharge studies throughout the GAB. The potential

recharge zones of the GAB are relatively well known. Recharge can occur where the GAB intake beds are

exposed at or close to the land surface or anywhere in the unconfined parts of the Basin. This zone, where there

is recharge potential, has been estimated to be 10 % of the Basin area (GABCC, 1998).

4.1. Western Margin (SA & NT)

There is no published paper or report that deals specifically with groundwater recharge along the Western

Margin. Love et al., (2000) investigated the relative importance of a number of processes that affect Cl- and 36Cl

distribution in the south-western flow systems to provide more precise estimates of age and flow and recharge

rates. In situ production of 36Cl, secular variations in the rate of production of 36Cl, and its subsequent fallout as

well as rates of diffusion of stable Cl- from adjacent aquitards masks the interpretation of rates of 36Cl/Cl decay

along the along hydraulic gradients and can preclude estimating absolute groundwater ages. Mean flow

velocities of 0.24 .03 m yr-1 were calculated from absolute 36Cl concentrations, however, and are a more

reliable parameter than calculated ages, because fewer assumptions and approximations are required. These flow

rates are an order of magnitude lower than others recorded in the basin (Bentley et al 1986; Torgersen et al.,

1991).

Recharge rates to the main J-K aquifer estimated from chloride mass balance in the unconfined aquifers are 0.16

0.08 mm yr-1 and were probably up to a factor of 3 higher > 30 kyr ago as indicated by decreasing Cl- and 18O

concentrations along the head gradient. Note, however, that the study area did not include any flood out zones

associated with ephemeral streams, where it is possible than higher rates of recharge may occur.

Matthews (1997) summarised the hydrogeology of the NT portion of the GAB. Data in that study included 14C, 36Cl, major ions and 2H and 18O, with important implications for recharges process associated with ephemeral

creeks and is discussed in detail in Section 5.

4.2. Coonamble Embayment (NSW)

The most recent studies of the water fluxes, water balance and recharge of the GAB within the Coonamble

Embayment are by Brownbill (2000), Radke el al. (2000) and Wolfgang (2000). The former report considers the

groundwater status of the region with respect to analysis of hydrographs and potential impacts of irrigation and

other. The Pilliga sandstone has been exploited since the early 1900s and significant hydraulic pressure declines

were noted at least 50 years ago when the NSW government started regular monitoring of key artesian bores.

Periodic flooding occurs along river valleys of the Macquarie and Castlereagh Rivers, although the extent and

frequency of flooding has declined due to the dams and impoundments built along the Macquarie River in the

20th century (Fig. 15). There are records of 10 or more floods in the region (Keshwan, 1995) with up to ~25% of

the area flooded and about 3-4 major floods per century. The last major floods were in the 1950s and 1970s (in

the latter years only on the Castlereagh, due to dams on the Macquarie).

Page 38: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

38

Figure. 15. Flood map showing boundaries of a major flood in the Macquarie and Castlereagh catchments (after DWR, 1991).

Estimates of recharge rate are highly variable, in part due to widely-ranging estimates of the area of recharge

(local recharge). The estimated recharge area as documented by Wolfgang (2000) ranges from 453 – 35 000 km2

with a ‘best’ estimate of ~1,625 km2. This translates to an annual recharge volume estimate of ~9740 ML/yr or 6

mm/yr. This is higher than the 0.2 – 1.1 mm/yr estimates derived from 36Cl data by Radke et al., (2000) and at

the lower end of recharge estimates derived from the Queensland recharge beds derived from soil water chloride

mass balance by Kellett et al., (2003) i.e., 6 – 30 mm/yr.

The chloride mass balance estimates (see section 3) derived by Wolfgang (2000) use input chloride values from

rainfall from Dubbo ([Cl]rain = 3.25 mg/l) and mean annual rainfall of 520 mm yr-1. The rainfall amount may be

an underestimate of that received in the recharge zone. Due to the inverse relationship between rainfall amount

and chloride concentration in rainfall, however, the overall deposition rate of chloride based on the Dubbo data

may be reasonable. Wolfgang has reported data from ~20 boreholes from the recharge zone where measured

chloride in groundwater range from 47 – 2,000 mg/L. Using the mass balance equation given in section 3, the

recharge rate estimates range from 2 – 51.2 mm/yr with a mean value of 9.5 mm/yr and log mean of 6 mm/yr.

This translates to a recharge volume that range in estimates from 3000 – 50000 ML/yr.

Page 39: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

39

Estimates of recharge from the Macquarie River along the Buddah fault (north of Narromine) range from

160,000 – 730,000 ML/yr while leakage may have increased due to higher stream water levels and groundwater

pumping (Keshwan, 1995). The importance of the flooding event to the recharge of the Pilliga Sandstone is not

certain, however, with claims of it being far greater than that of diffuse widespread recharge (Keshwan, 1995).

Wolfgang (2000) suggests that its importance is overstated due to the Pilliga Sandstone having a greater head

than the river systems in the larger portion of the flooded river valley areas. Furthermore, the major ion

chemistry in the underlying Pilliga Sandstone aquifer is very different from Macquarie River.

Brownbill (2000) suggested that there is likely to be connectivity between the Jurassic GAB aquifer and the

overlying Cainozoic aquifer because the former responds to pumping, infiltration and ET from the overlying

Cainozoic system. He considered there is a need to obtain better estimates of recharge in the Border

Rivers/intake bed region, where there is also extensive groundwater extraction. Radke et al., (2000) also suggest

that the Cainozioc aquifer recharges Pilliga Sandstones in the northern part of the study area where the head

gradient is higher and where the chemistry of the two systems are similar.

The extinct, or ‘palaeo’, mound springs along northern Bogan River imply wetter conditions at some time in the

past resulting in higher artesian pressures. It is not established whether the sinking of artesian bores has lowered

the pressure that has resulted in the decline in mound spring flow. Most are reported to be not flowing now but

may have been active until the early 20th Century.

Rising water tables in the Cainozoic aquifer systems is thought to be caused by river regulation and land-use

change. Current recharge to Pilliga from the unconfined aquifer is unlikely, as there is higher head in the Pilliga

than in the phreatic water table throughout most of the region. Potentiometric heads of the Jurassic aquifer are

40-60m higher than the watertable (unconfined) in the Cainozoic and Mesozoic parts of the Macquarie and

Castlereagh catchments. It is not known, however, what the relative head gradient conditions were like over the

past several tens to hundreds of thousands of years.

Isotopic data documented by Radke et al., (2000) show that 36Cl data for the NSW portion of the GAB indicate

flow systems increasing in age along the inferred hydraulic gradient, with indicative groundwater ages <5,000

years within the highland areas and river alluvial valleys in the recharge zone to >200 000 years in the western

portion of the Embayment, with horizontal flow rates decreasing to <1 m/yr as groundwater traverses from the

alluvial fans and move towards the plains.

Page 40: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

40

5. RECHARGE MECHANISMS IN THE WESTERN GAB AND COONAMBLE EMBAYMENT

5.1 Conceptual models of recharge

The three predominant recharge mechanisms to occur in both the Western Margin and Coonamble Embayment

are:

a) Diffuse Recharge,

b) Ephemeral creek recharge, and

c) Mountain block recharge.

These are represented diagrammatically for the various settings of the GAB in Figure 16. The relative

importance of the three will vary from place to place, and over time, due to the very long time frame of

groundwater flow systems in GAB flow systems.

Figure 16. Diagrammatic representation of recharge process in the Great Artesian Basin (reproduced from Radke et al., 2000).

As potential evapo-transpiration substantially exceeds precipitation in the Western margin it is only the extreme

rainfall events that will result in groundwater recharge. As a result it is unlikely that any seasonal recharge will

occur under the current climate regime. These large episodic events result in large and often unpredictable

temporal variability in recharge. Recharge has the potential to occur when the aquifer is outcropping or sub

Page 41: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

41

cropping and throughout the unsaturated zone overlying the unconfined aquifer. This represents a potential

recharge zone from the basin margin up to 50 to 300 km wide. Recharge also has the potential to occur from

elevated regions of the Peake and Dennison Ranges.

5.2 Diffuse recharge

Diffuse recharge has the potential to occur across the landscape from these large episodic events. There is

evidence, however, to suggest that diffuse recharge is extremely small or non-existent under the current climate

(Matthews, 1997, Love et al., 2000). This evidence comes from sampling unconfined wells not associated with

the drainage pattern of ephemeral creeks. Carbon-14 activities for these wells are generally at background levels

indicating the groundwater is >30 000 years old. It should be noted that this interpretation should only be

considered as a working hypothesis at this time. The reason for this is that there is only a paucity of data from

unconfined wells in the recharge zones. Not only is there a lack of age dating data; many wells do not have basic

hydrogeological information such as depth to the water table and salinity.

If we assume the current “working hypothesis” is correct, and that no diffuse recharge is occurring today along

the western margin, this does not imply that diffuse recharge did occur in the past. The climate in the Western

Margin was considerably wetter during parts of the Holocene and Pleistocene (Wasson and Clark 1988) and as a

result there would have been more favourable conditions for recharge. Love at al (2000) suggested that that

recharge rates were at least a factor of 3 greater in the Pleistocene. Although not referred to in their manuscript

much of this recharge would have occurred as diffuse recharge.

5.3 Localized Recharge.

In times of high rainfall events surface water run-off accumulates in topographic depressions, such as playas and

ephemeral water courses and their associated flood plains. During such events, saturated conditions, combined

with the high permeability of river bed sediments, has the potential to drive infiltration, deep drainage and

recharge through ephemeral creeks. The first mention of recharge occurring under ephemeral creeks was by

Vine, (Vine 1969) who postulated it as the major mechanism for recharge in the northern Eromanga Basin.

There is evidence to suggest that ephemeral creek recharge is occurring today along the western margin. The

most compelling evidence comes from the Finke and Goyder River region in the NT (Matthews 1997). Stable

isotopes of the water molecule are significantly more depleted with 18O values < – 9.3 ‰, in the catchment

zone of the Finke River. Carbon –14 activities of > 90 %MC indicate a thermonuclear component and that

groundwater has recharged within the last 40 years. Matthews (1997) mapped a groundwater mound along a

transect near the Finke and postulated that a 3H-36Cl peak could occur in the unsaturated zone at depths of

approximately 50 m below the ground surface mirroring the groundwater mound.

In contrast, in areas away from the possible influence of the braided streams, catchment zone 18O values are > -

6.8 ‰ suggesting diffuse recharge in these zones. Carbon –14 activities for these wells range between 3-22

%MC indicating recharge between 10,000 to 30,000 years ago. Corrections for the addition of dead carbon

would help determine a more accurate chronology of these .

It is also possible that recharge occurs along a number of braided streams along the western zone, such as the

Alberga. Unfortunately, there is no available hydraulic or isotopic data from these regions to support this.

Page 42: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

42

Clearly to develop a consistent conceptual model for groundwater recharge, additional data such as stable

isotopes (2H, 18O) and groundwater age indicators (14C, 36Cl, 4He) as well as depth to groundwater and any

aquifer characteristics are required.

Because diffuse recharge is low or non existent today, the current day inputs to the water budget must be

dominated by ephemeral creek recharge. As well as obtaining values of ephemeral creek recharge, the spatial

extent of the braided streams needs to be known. In order to understand the relative importance of palaorecharge

from ephemeral creeks, however, a chronology of the history and spatial extent of the drainage pattern is

required.

Craddock et al., (2007) produced a digital elevation model for part of the Simpson Desert that identified a

number of palaeo-drainage patterns underlying the sand dunes. It is unlikely that palaeo-drainage patterns would

have significant impact on recharge as the majority occur in zones of upward hydraulic head gradient. This

technique, however, could be useful in other zones of the western margin that are covered in sand dunes with

favourable hydraulic conditions. A potential target zone for this could be to the west and north-west of Pedirka in

SA.

5.4 Mountain Block Recharge.

There is some potential for so-called Mountain Block Recharge (Fig. 17) from the elevated Peake and Dennison

Ranges into the adjacent aquifer. Mountain Block Recharge is considered to be an important recharge

mechanism in semi-arid and arid catchments of the southwestern USA (Wilson and Guan 2004). As no

hydrolgeological data exits throughout the Peake and Dennison Ranges, however, it is difficult to speculate what

the recharge mechanism and rates may be. The potential pathways for Mountain Block Recharge are discussed

in greater depth under the Coonamble Embayment where it is potentially far more important than the Western

Margin (see Section 4.2).

Figure 17 Conceptual diagram showing mountain block recharge which is a likely mechanism within the GAB,

particularly the Coonamble zone.

Page 43: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

43

5.5 Modern and Palaeo-Recharge in the GAB

The only evidence for modern recharge along the western margin is near the Finke River in the NT and near

Marla in northern SA (Matthews 1997, Beyerle et al 1999). Recharge through the Finke system occurs via

ephemeral creek recharge through highly permeable sediments and associated flood out events. As discussed

previously this has been identified on the basis of modern 14C activities. Modern recharge has been identified

near Marla based on a relatively shallow depth to the water table and the presence of modern 14C and tritium

(Beyerle et al 1999). The recharge mechanism near Marla is most likely associated with preferential flow from

basement rocks adjacent to the GAB aquifer sequence. On the western margin the two pre-requests for modern

recharge appear to be a relative shallow depth to the water table and a mechanism that allows for preferential

flow. Along the eastern margin of the Coonamble Embayment the potential for modern recharge has also been

identified in certain locations by elevated 14C activities (Radke et al 2000).

Based on a thick unsaturated zone (up to 100 m) and chloride mass balance (CMB) recharge estimates of ~ 0.16

mm/yr., diffuse recharge is extremely low along the Western Margin in SA (Love et al., 2000). Residence time

in the unsaturated zone could be on the order of 10-80 kyr depending upon the depth to the water table and

porosity of the unsaturated zone.

A greater understanding of palaeo-recharge rates and mechanisms is not only important in developing a

conceptual model of the GAB, but quantification of recharge is required for input to numerical models. Extinct

Mound Springs with topographic elevations higher than active springs today clearly suggest higher aquifer heads

in the past. From this we can infer both wetter climates and higher recharge rates in the past. This also suggests

that the boundaries of the GAB were possibly more extensive in the past, where the depth to the water table

would have been shallower and the boundary between the unconfined/confined aquifer would have migrated

outwards towards the edge of the basin.

The only reference in the literature to quantifying palaeo-recharge rates is from Love and co-workers who

suggested that recharge rates were likely to be factor of at least 3 greater, approximately 30 kyr ago along the

western margin of SA. This was based on a decrease in chloride concentrations and depletion of the stable

isotopes of the water molecule along groundwater flow paths.

Estimating rates of palaeo-recharge is complex and remains a challenge for future research in the GAB and other

large arid sedimentary basins. This requires not only an accurate estimate of the recharge rate but also an

associate chronology. The most common method used to estimate recharge rates in arid and semi-arid zones as

discussed previously is the chloride mass balance (CMB) technique. Extreme care should be used when applying

the CMB at large temporal scales. The use of modern Cl- deposition rates and Cl- concentration from the aquifer

can lead to erroneous estimates of palaeo-recharge. As precipitation and Cl- depositional rates vary temporally,

there is a requirement to obtain information from archival records (such as unsaturated zones, lake sediments

etc). Much of this data, however, can often only be used in a proxy manner with limited quantitative data.

Groundwater systems can some times contain archival data from the time of recharge, but it is often difficult to

determine the recharge signature because of mixing processes within the aquifer system. This is particularly true

for large time scales.

The stable isotopic composition of the groundwater for the western margin and Coonamble Embayment regions

(Fig. 18) shows 2H ranges from -51 to -24 (‰, VSMOW) and 18O ranges from -7.4 to -2.6 (‰, VSMOW).

The data for the Coonamble Embayment suggest two clusters around -40‰ and -6.7‰ and -25‰ and -3.3‰

for 2H and 18O, respectively. The former data lie on the Global meteoric water Line (GMWL), while the latter

lie slightly to the right of the line and are generally from an area at the most south-eastern most part of the

Page 44: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

44

Coonamble Embayment and may not be related to the rest of the GAB groundwater in the region. Stable isotope

data for the western flow systems lie on a linear trend to the right and parallel to the meteoric water line with a

mean value about -46‰ and -6.1‰ for 2H and 18O, respectively, which is considerably more negative than

present day rainfall in Alice Springs (-33.7‰ and -6.3‰ repectively; GNIP,2008). These data indicate that

recharge to the aquifer occurred during a climate that was both wetter and or cooler than the present day climate

regime in the respective recharge areas.

-55

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2

GAB Stable isotopes

W estern flow systemsCoonamble Embayment

2 H (

‰, V

SM

OW

)

18O (‰ , VSMOW )

GMW L

Figure 18. Stable isotope data for the western flow systems (data from Love etal., 200; Zhang et al., 2007) and Coonamble Embayment (data from Radke et al., 2000).

5.6 Model Recharge rates in the Great Artesian Basin

Numerical models of the GAB have been attempted in both steady-state and transient modes (Welsh 2000 and

2006). The steady-state model GABFLOW was constructed using the MODFLOW code to predict changes in

artesian pressure as a result of bore rehabilitation throughout the basin. Recharge rates used in this study are

generally higher than recharge rates predicted from field studies. This is especially so on the western margin

where modeled recharge rates range from ~ 5-70 mm/yr, compared to field results of < 1 mm/yr (note field

results only represent diffuse recharge). In the transient groundwater flow model recharge rates varied between <

2.2 – 33 mm/yr throughout. The average recharge rate for all designated recharge cells is 2.4 mm/ yr which is a

factor 2 lower than the average recharge rates used in the steady state GABFLOW model. The recharge values

used in the transient simulation are more closely aligned to previous field studies (Love at al 2000, Kellett et al

2003). Welsh (2006) concluded that the water balance of the basin is not in equilibrium, with discharge 70 %

greater than inflows over a calibration period of 1965-2000. This supports the results of Love and co workers

Page 45: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

45

(2000) who suggested that discharge to the system under the current day climate exceeds recharge. Clearly

changes in the hydrodynamic equilibrium of the GAB are effected not only by anthropogenic impacts, but also

long term changes in climatic regime. Changes in climate not only effect recharge rates but will have a

significant impact on changing boundary conditions throughout the Basin. To obtain a greater conceptual

understanding of the basin, there is a need to develop transient numerical models over long time scales

(~millions of years). We would recommend this be done in a step-wise approach using simple cross-sectional

numerical models to obtain a greater understanding of changing flow dynamics with time, rather than attempting

a basin wide modeling approach.

Page 46: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

46

6. EVALUATION OF APPROPRIATE TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE RECHARGE IN THE GAB

In essence, hydraulic approaches for estimating recharge provide information on recharge rates and mechanism

occurring today. The GAB groundwaters, however, are essentially a fossil resource, hence these approaches have

limited application. An alternative and more applicable approach to investigating recharge in the GAB is to use

chemical and isotopic tools, as they can integrate over a wide range of temporal scales. A summary of the

advantages and disadvantages of different recharge techniques is presented in Table 1.

Water balance approaches have a high level of uncertainty in the GAB because they rely on accurate

measurements of precipitation, evaporation, transpiration and runoff to estimate recharge as the residual of the

water balance. Increasing the number of time steps to calculate daily water balances can reduce these errors. This

approach is considered to be extremely limited in most applications in the GAB. The only potential use could be

in the estimation of localised recharge from ephemeral creeks. There are many disadvantages, however, and it

would be very expensive both in terms of instrumentation and detailed and regular monitoring in the field. It also

relies on the unpredictability of large fold events.

Methods that rely on estimating hydraulic conductivity such as Darcy’s Law and unsaturated and saturated

modelling at best will only provide an order of magnitude estimate of the recharge rate due to the large spatial

variability in hydraulic conductivity. However, groundwater modelling that incorporates groundwater tracer data

has the potential to constrain the recharge rate and should be attempted.

The water table fluctuation method (WTF) from groundwater hydrographs is unlikely to be useful due to the

large depth to the water table often > 80 m. In these situations groundwater hydrographs are likely to the

constant over time and will not show any seasonal variations required to estimate recharge. It should be noted,

however, that in certain scenarios it is possible that groundwater hydrographs may be in decline due to extraction

from a fossil groundwater resource. Alternatively, a rising hydrograph may indicate a change in land use as has

occurred in the Murray Basin. Application of this technique may provide valuable data under zones of localised

recharge such as the Finke river system and other ephemeral creek systems.

There is a need to update maps of water table and potentiometric surface in both the Western Recharge Zone and

the Coonamble Embayment. Monitoring of water levels in the GAB largely occurs in the artesian portion of the

basin. For recharge studies, however, it is important to obtain data on the unconfined portion of the aquifer. This

could be achieved in a two-step process: (1) Examination of existing databases and other archives in the State

agencies of SA, NT and NSW; (2) surveying and water levels measurements via a field survey.

The most promising methodologies to estimate recharge in the Western GAB and Coonamble Embayment are

those that use environmental tracers. Environmental tracers have the ability to provide information on a wide

range of spatial and temporal scales. Due to uncertainties in all methods for estimating recharge, it is strongly

recommended to use a multiple approach using a range of environmental tracers such as (Cl, 36Cl, 14C, 3H, CFC’s 4He, 2H, 18O). Stable isotopes of the water molecule will not provide estimates of recharge rates but can

provide valuable information on recharge mechanisms to improve the conceptual model.

Unsaturated zone profiles estimate deep drainage over a small spatial scale, but provide invaluable data over

different time scales throughout the Holocene and late Pleistocene. This is important, as the majority of

groundwater recharge in the GAB occurred under past climates. Tracers sampled in the saturated zone measure

Page 47: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

47

actual recharge, and not deep drainage, as water has reached the water table. These techniques are extremely

beneficial for estimating recharge over much larger spatial scales.

Page 48: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

48

Table 1. Summary of different techniques to estimate recharge. Data complied from review of existing literature as well as author’s knowledge - Note much of the data in this table comes from detailed reviews found in Scanlon and Cook (2004). Note Recharge rates in mm/yr, - Spatial scales in m2 and temporal scale in years unless otherwise specified in the table.

Scale

Method Recharge Range

(mm/yr)

Spatial

(m2)

Temporal

(yrs)

Advantage Disadvantage

Background Information

– Hydro geomorphic

mapping

Can provide order

of magnitude

estimate of

recharge

Local to

regional

Generally provides

process information

A pre requisite for any recharge study.

Develops conceptual model of recharge

processes. Iterative approach should be

used as more data is gathered

throughout the recharge study to

improve the conceptual model

None

Water Budget Order of magnitude

at best

Local to

regional

Generally yearly Useful as a check on other methods. Requires accurate estimates of

evaporation, transpiration and run off.

Surface Water

Page 49: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

49

Channel loss 5 - > 50 Local to

intermediate

Daily Only application under ephemeral

creeks and flood out zones.

Requires daily estimates of

evaporation, transpiration and run off.

Expensive

Unsaturated Zone

Darcy –Richards Law 20 -400 Point < 300 yrs Does not accurately estimate low water

fluxes

Expensive: requires accurate estimates

of K()

Lysimeters 5 - >100 20 m2 Length of test 2-3

yrs

Can provide accurate estimates of deep

drainage.

Expensive field instrumentation and

monitoring. Difficult to represent

natural conditions.

Applied Tracers 10 - >1000 100 m2 Length of test < 5

yrs

Very accurate estimates of recharge

under ideal situations

Needs approval from environmental

agencies. Requires high water fluxes

Chloride Mass Balance

(CMB)

0.01 - 200 point 5 - > 10, 000 y Very accurate for low recharge rates.

Has wide application in semi-arid and

arid zones

Requires estimates of the total Cl- flux,

under present and past climates

Event Markers 10 – 60 Point < 50 yrs Potentially useful technique assuming

high water fluxes under ephemeral

creeks

Under low water fluxes the bomb peak

is still in the root zone Requires

sufficient water fluxes

Radiotracer Decay 0.1 - 30 Point 500 - > 100,000 yrs Used in combination with CMB to

provide palaeo recharge rates

Need to account for subsurface

sources and sinks of tracers. Requires

specialised interpretation

Page 50: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

50

Unsaturated Modelling Infinite <100 m2 All time scales Can constrain recharge provided

reliable field data is available

Relies on reliable estimates of K(),

Order of magnitude at best

Saturated Zone

Darcy’s Law Order of magnitude Local to

regional

short None in arid zones dominated by

palaeo recharge

Requires accurate estimates of

hydraulic conductivity and gradient

Hydrographs 5 - 400 50 –10,000 m2 Length of record Useful technique if water table is

shallow. May be useful under

ephemeral streams. In certain situations

may detect change in land use or

climate.

Has limited application for diffuse

recharge in GAB due to deep water

tables that do not reflect seasonal

recharge

Chloride Mass balance

(CMB)

0.01 - 400 5- 10,000 m2 10 – > 10,000 Integrates preferential flow in

unsaturated zone. Can provide sub-

regional estimates of recharge. Very

useful in arid zones as it can measure

low water fluxes

Must ensure there are no addition

sources or sinks of Cl other than

atmosphere

Event Markers 20 -1000 5- 10,000 m2 < 50 yrs Potentially useful technique assuming

high water fluxes under ephemeral

creeks

Requires accurate estimates of input

functions. Requires expert

interpretation in isotope hydrology

Accumulating

Tracers

Semi – qualitative

only

5- 10,000 m2 1000 - >10,000 May provide estimates of residence

time to back-calculate recharge.

Improves conceptual understanding of

system.

Often requires sophisticated sampling

methods. Data can be difficult to

interpret. Requires expert

interpretation in isotope hydrology

Page 51: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

51

Radiotracer Decay 1-100 5- 10,000 m2 14C 500 –25,000

36Cl 50,000 >

300,000

Integrates recharge process. Very

useful for low water fluxes

Need to account for subsurface

sources and sinks of tracers. Data can

be difficult to analyses requires

expertise in dating methodologies

Groundwater Modelling Infinite (in theory) Local to

regional

All time scales Use should be restricted to constraining

recharge rates with additional isotopic

and chemical data

Relies on accurate estimates of K;

order of magnitude at best

Geophysics and Remote

Sensing

N/A Local to

regional

At the time of

measurement

Non-invasive. Good spatial resolution.

Provides data for scaling recharge.

Generally requires expensive ground-

truthing

Page 52: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

52

7. PROPOSALS FOR ESTIMATING RECHARGE

Estimation of groundwater recharge is an iterative process. Firstly an examination of all existing data is required

to develop a conceptual model of the system and provide a likely range of recharge values. This is important in

the selection of specific recharge techniques. Below we present a staged approach to recharge estimation. It is

important that after each stage the conceptual model is re examined in light of new information. The proposed

program is organised in a hierarchical manner starting from the basic desktop study of compilation of existing

information through to detailed field programs involving drilling of soil profiles and groundwater sampling and

chemical and isotopic analyses.

7.1 Desktop study

A desktop study is a recommended starting point in any recharge study to compile available information in a

coherent manner to provide first-pass estimates of recharge rates.

Compile all available data:

Land-use, soil type, vegetation

Hydrological data: river discharge, rainfall (long-term trends) evapo-transpiration

Hydrogeology: aquifer units, unsaturated zone thickness, aquifer properties [aquifer architecture], total sediment

thickness or depth to basement; potentiometric head; hydrographs

Flow system analysis: conceptual model to give zones of potential recharge [plan and cross-section]. Preliminary

recharge rate estimates based on chloride mass balance from existing groundwater data (e.g., Wolfgang, 2000).

Analyse the suitability of using the water table fluctuation method to estimate recharge from bore hydrographs in

the unconfined portion of the aquifer.

Costing:

8 weeks professional $40 000

6 weeks GIS $25 000

Total $65 000

Limitations:

Limited data sets available for the SA and NT unconfined system, which is required to constrain water table

contours.

Page 53: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

53

Limited chloride data in unconfined aquifer in western margin and imprecise data for rainfall chloride

concentrations.

7.2 Well survey

The well survey would be the next level of activity that would require some fieldwork and laboratory analysis.

Measure potentiometric head and land elevation to provide RSWL data for the recharge zones.

Sample the wells for major ion chemistry, isotopes and other tracers.

Carry out geophysical logging at selected wells to estimate aquifer properties.

Costing:

Sampling of 60 wells in SA/NT and 40 wells in the

Coonamble embayment of NSW

$120 000

Analysis costs $50 000

Geophysical logging $50 000

Data evaluation and reporting $30 000

Total $250 000

Limitations:

Potential poor coverage in critical areas and unknown well integrity.

7.3 Transects in the unconfined part of the GAB

Conduct sampling of wells along transects along inferred flow lines (perpendicular to isopotentials determined

from 1 & 2 above).

Use information gathered from 7.1 & 7.2 to ensure hydrologic and hydraulic continuity.

Collect 6 – 8 wells per transect – 2 transects in SA; 2 in NT and 2 in NSW

Costing:

Page 54: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

54

Sampling of ~28 wells in SA/NT

and 12 wells in NSW

$75 000

Analyses costs $40 000

Data evaluation and reporting $20 000

Total $135 000

Limitations:

Hydraulic and hydrological continuity needs to be established.

Cost assumes no new drilling is required.

7.4 Unsaturated zone profiles of soil water properties and chloride mass balance

The use of unsaturated zone profiles has been used extensively to estimate recharge rates in the Murray-Darling

Basin and in the Queensland portion of the GAB (Kellett et al., 1998).

Carry out drilling and coring through the unsaturated zone in various land units that cover the different land-units

(creek beds, open scrubland, dunes etc).

Analysis of core samples for soil moisture content, soil suction, chloride content, stable isotopes of water, (some) 36Cl

Profiles at 20 sites in SA/NT and 10 sites in NSW, in some cases to the water table: costing based on 10 m

coring per day with average depth of 50 metres.

Costing:

Coring and drilling $400 000

Analyses costs $350 000

Data evaluation and reporting $100 000

Total $850 000

Limitations:

Availability of contractor to carry out specialized drilling and coring

Page 55: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

55

Scaling up of data over very large area

7.5 Estimation of direct and localised recharge

This component complements information for 7.4 above, but provides estimates from flood and localised

recharge, which in arid areas are sometimes equal to, or greater than, local or diffuse recharge across the entire

landscape.

Compile all available data on flooding records for the Lake Eyre basin and the Macquarie; Castlereagh and

Bogan rivers.

Collect soil profiles below surface water drainage systems in both the unsaturated and saturated zones (as per for

7.4 above).

Digital elevation and remote sensing to identify buried palaeochannels.

Costing:

Coring and drilling (3 sites in

SA/NT and 2 sites in NSW)

$200 000

Analyses costs $75 000

Data evaluation and reporting $25 000

Total $300 000

Limitations:

Flood records are limited to last 100 years in NSW. Data for Lake Eyre Basin also limited, and may not be

applicable to the western margin.

Access to suitable sites for drilling, particularly in NSW, need to be determined.

Page 56: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

56

8. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abbott, WE, 1884. Water supply in the interior of NSW. J. Proc. Royal Soc. NSW, 18, 85-111.

Airey, PL, Calf, GE, Campell, BL, Habermehl, MA, Hartley, PE, Roman, D, 1979. Aspects of the isotope

hydrology of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. In: Proceeding of Intl. Symp., Isotope Hydrology and Water

Res. Devt., Intl. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1979.

Airey, P L, Bentley, HW, Calf, GE, Davis, SN, Elmore, D, Gove, H, Habermehl, MA, Phillips, F, Smith, J,

Torgersen, T, 1983. Isotope hydrology of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. In: Proceeding of Intl. Symp.,

Isotope Hydrology and Water Res. Devt., Intl. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 12-16 Sep, 1983.

Allison GB & Hughes MW, 1983 The use of natural tracers as indicators of soil-water movement in a temperate

semi-arid region. J. Hydrology, 60:157-173.

Allison, GB, Gee, GW ,Tyler, SW, 1994. Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid

and semiarid regions. Soil Science Soc. America J., 58:1

Appelo, CAJ & Postma, D, 1993. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.

Bentley, HW, Phillips, FM, Davis, SN, Habermehl, MA, Airey, PL, Calf, GE, Elmore, D, Gove, HE, Torgersen

T, 1986. Chlorine-36 dating of very old groundwater. The Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Water Resour, Res.

22(13), 1991-2001.

Bethke, CM, Xiang Z, Torgersen, T, 1999. Groundwater flow and the 4He distribution in the Great Artesian

Basin of Australia. J. Geophys. Res. 104 B6, 12, 999-13 011.

Beyerle, U, Aeschbach-Hertig, W, Peeter, F, Kipfer, R, Purtschert, R, Lehmann, BE, Loosli, HH, Love, AJ,

1999. Noble gas data from the Great Artesian Basin provide a temperature record of Australia on time scales of

105 years In: Proceeding of Intl. Symp., Isotope Hydrology and Water Res. Devt., Intl. Atomic Energy Agency,

Vienna, 19-24 May, 1999.

Bierwirth, PN & Welsh, WD, 2000. Delineation of recharge beds in the Great Artesian basin using airborne

gamma radiometrics and satellite remote sensing. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

Brownbill, R. 2000. NSW Great Artesian Basin Status Report. NSW Dept. of Land and Water Conservation,

37pp + 2 Appendices.

Calf, GE & Habermehl, MA, 1984. Isotope hydrology and hydrochemistry of the Great Artesian basin. In:

Proceeding of Intl. Symp., Isotope Hydrology and Water Res. Devt., Intl. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 12-

16 Sep, 1983.

Clark, ID & Fritz, P, 1997. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. Lewis Publishers. Boca-Raton,

Page 57: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

57

Collon, P, Kutschera, W, Loosli, HH, Lehmann, BE, Purtschert, R, Love, A, et al., . 2000. 81Kr in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia: a new method for dating very old groundwater. Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 182,

103-113.

Cook, PG & Herczeg, AL (editors). Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Kluwer Academic

Publishers, Boston Ma, 16 Chapters, November 1999 552 pp., 1999.

Cook PG and Herczeg AL, 1999. Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Press,

Boston, 529 pp.

Cook PG & Bohlke JK, 1999. Determining timescales for groundwater flow and solute transport. In: PG Cook

and AL Herczeg (ed.) Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Kluwer AP, Boston, pp.1-30.

Cook PG & Herczeg AL 1998. Groundwater Chemical Methods for Recharge Studies. Part 1 of 2. L.. Zhang and

GR Walker (ed.) The Basics of Recharge and Discharge. CSIRO Publishing.

Cook, PG & Herczeg, AL 1998. Groundwater chemical methods for recharge studies. Part 2 of 2: Zhang, L.

(editor), Studies in Catchment Hydrology: The Basics of Recharge and Discharge, Melbourne, Vic.CSIRO

Publishing: 17 pp.

Cook PG, Jolly ID, Leaney FW, Walker GR, Allan GL, Fifield L.K & Allison GB 1994. Unsaturated zone

tritium and chlorine-36 profiles from southern Australia: their use as tracers of soil water movement. Water

Resour. Res., 30, 1709-1719.

Coplen, T, Herczeg, AL, and Barnes, CB, 1999. Isotope Engineering - using stable isotopes of the water

molecule to solve practical problems. Cook, PG & Herczeg, A. (eds), Environmental Tracers in Subsurface

Hydrology, Boston, USA :Kluwer Academic Press: 79-110.

Cox R & Barron, R. Eds. 1998. Great Artesian Basin Resource Study, GABBC.

Craddock R, Hutchinson M, Stein J, Tooth S, Maxwell T, 2007, Evidence for Buried River Channels in the

Simpson Desert, XVII INQUA Congress 2007.

David, TWE, 1983. Artesian water in NSW and Qld. J Proc. Royal Soc. NSW. 27, 408-443.

DWR, 1991. Water resources in the Castlereagh, Macquarie and Bogan valleys. Depatrment of Water Resources,

NSW Report.

Downes, RG & Sleeman, JR 1955. Soils of the Macquarie region, NSW. Soil Publ. No.4, CSIRO, Melbourne.

Dyce, PH & Dowling, TI. 1997. Mapped biophysical themes produced for reconstructing historical salt balances

and stream salinity trends in the catchments of the Murray-Darling basin. CSIRO Land and Water Tech. Rep.

19/97

Eriksson E. & Khunakasem V, 1969 Chloride concentration in groundwater, recharge rate and rate of

deposition of chloride in the Israel Coastal Plain. J. Hydrol. 7, 178-197.

Page 58: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

58

Evans, WR, Hillier, J, & Woolley, DR, 1994. Hydrogeology of the Darling River Drainage basin: Qld/NSW,

Australia. 1:1 000 000 Map Sheet, AGSO Canberra.

(GABCC) Great Artesian Basin Consultative Council, 1998. Great Artesian Basin Resource Study. R. Cox and

A. Barron, eds., 235p.

Gee GW & Hillel D, 1988. Groundwater recharge in arid regions: review and critique of estimation methods.

Hydrol Proc 2, 255-266.

Goodrich DC, Williams DG, Unkrich CL, Hogan JF, et al., 2004, Comparison of methods to estimate ephemeral

channel recharge, Walnut Gulch, San Pedro River Basin, Arizona In: JF Hogan, FM Phillips, & BR Scanlon,

(eds.), Groundwater recharge in a desert environment: the southwestern United States: Washington, D.C.,

American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Applications Series, v. 9, p. 77-100.

Habermehl, MA 1980. The Great Artesian Basin, Australia. BMR J. Geol. Geophys. 5, 9-38.

Habermehl, MA & Lau, L 1997. hydrogeology of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia (1:250 000). Australian

Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra.

Hantush MS 1967, Growth and decay of groundwater mounds in response to uniform precipitation. Water

Resour. Res. 3, 227-2334.

Harrington, GA 1997. Recharge mechanisms and chemical evolution in an arid groundwater system, central

Australia. PhD thesis, Flinders University of SA, 333pp.

Harrington, G.A., Cook, P.G. and Herczeg, A.L. 2002. Spatial and temporal variability of ground water recharge

in central Australia: A tracer approach. Ground Water, 40: 518-528.

Healy RW & Cook PG 2002. Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology J. 10(1), 91-109.

Hendrickx J & Walker GR 1997. Recharge from precipitation. In: I. Simmers (ed) Recharge of phreatic aquifers

in (semi-) arid areas. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 19-98.

Herczeg, AL & Edmunds, WM 1999. Inorganic ions as Tracers. In PG Cook & AL Herczeg (eds.),

Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology, Boston, USA :Kluwer Academic Press: 31-78.

Herczeg, AL, Torgersen, T, Chivas, A. Habermehl, MA 1991. Geochemistry of groundwater from the Great

Artesian Basin, Australia. J. Hydrol. 126, 225-245.

Hogan, JF, Phillips, FM, Scanlon, BR 2004. (eds.) Groundwater recharge in a desert environment; the

southwestern United States. Water and Science Application 9, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC,

ISSN 1526-758X

Kellett, JR., Ransley, TR., Coram J., Jaycock, J., Barcaly, DF., McMahon, GA, Foster LM, Hillier JR. 2003.

Groundwater Recharge in the Great Artesian Basin Intake Beds, Queensland Department of Natural Resources

and Mines Technical Report.

Page 59: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

59

Keshwan, M. 1995. River loss investigation in the Macquarie River downstream of Narromine. Dept. Land &

Water Cons. Dubbo, NSW.

Leaney, FWJ, Herczeg, AL, & Walker, GR 2003. Salinisation of a fresh palaeo-ground water resource by

enhanced recharge. Ground Water 41, 84-93.

Lehmann, BE, Love, AJ, Purtschert, R, Collon, P, Loosli, HH, Kutschere, W, Beyerle, U, Aeschbach-Hertig, W,

Kipfer, R, Frape, SK, Herczeg, AL, Moran, J, Tolstikhin, IN, Groening, M. 2003. A comparison of groundwater

dating with 81Kr, 36Cl and 4he in four wells of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 211,

237-250.

Lerner DN, Issar, AS, Simmers I 1990 Groundwater recharge. A guide to understanding and estimating natural

recharge. IAH. Int Contrib Hydrgeo 8. Heinz, Heise, Hannover, 325pp.

Love, AJ, Herczeg, AL, Sampson, L, Cresswell, RG, Fifield, LK 2000. Sources of chloride and implications for 36Cl dating of old groundwater, south-western Great Artesian basin, Australia. Water Resour. Res. 36(6), 1561-

1574.

Matthews, I, 1997. Hydrogeology of the Great Artesian Basin in the Northern Territory, Water Resources

Division Darwin Report No 52/96A

Mazor, E 1995. The stagnant aquifer oncept part 1. large scale Artesian systems – Great Artesian basin,

Australia. J. Hydrol., 173, 219-240.

McKenzie, NJ 1992. Soils of the Lower Macquarie Valley, NSW. CSIRO Div. Soils rep. No. 117. CSIRO

Mulholland, C StJ 1950. Review of southern intake beds, NSW and their bearing on on artesian problems. In:

Geol. Surv. Geological Reports 1939-1945, Dept. of Mines, NSW p. 125-127.

Phillips, FM 2000. Chlorine-36 In:

Pigram, JJ 2006. Australia’s Water Resources, From Use to Management CSIRO Publishing. 226 pp.

Radke, BM, Ferguson, J, Cresswell, RG, Ransley, TR Habermehl, MA. 2000. Hydrochemistry and implied

hydrodynamics of the Cadna-owie – Hooray Aquifer, Great Artesian Basin. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

ISBN 0 642 47554 7 Commonwealth of Australia report.

Robbins NS 1998 Groundwater pollution, aquifer recharge and vulnerability. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ

130:224.

Sanford, WE, Plummer, LN, McAda, DP, Bexfield, LM, Anderholm, SK. 2004. Hydrochemical tracers in the

middle Rio Grande Basin, USA: 2. Calibration of a groundwater flow model. Hydrogeol. J., 12, 389-407.

Scanlon, BR, 2004, Evaluation of methods of estimating recharge in semiarid and arid regions in the

southwestern U.S., In: JF Hogan, FM Phillips, & BR Scanlon, (eds.), Groundwater recharge in a desert

environment: the southwestern United States: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, Water Science

Page 60: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

60

and Applications Series, v. 9, p. 235–254.

Scanlon, BR., Tyler, SW, Wierenga, PJ 1997, Hydrologic issues in arid, unsaturated systems and implications

for contaminant transport: Rev. Geophys. 35, no. 4, 461–490.

Scanlon, BR, Healy, RW, Cook, PG, 2002, Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater

recharge: Hydrogeology J. 10, 18–39.

Scanlon, BR, Keese, KE, Flint, A , Flint, LE, Gaye, CB, Edmunds, WM, Simmers, I, 2006. Global synthesis of

groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions: Hydrol. Proc., 20, 3335–3370.

Sharma ML (ed) 1989 Groundwater Recharge AA Belkema Rotterdam. 323pp.

Shepherd, RG 1978. Underground water resources of South Australia, Bulletin 48, South Australian Dept of

Mines and Energy, South Australian Govt. 66pp.

Simmers I (ed) 1988 Estimation of natural groundwater recharge. NATO ASI Ser C 222 Reidel, Dordrecht, 510

pp.

Simmers I (ed) 1997 Recharge of phreatic aquifers in semi –arid areas. IAH Int Contrib Hydrogeol 19, AA

Belkema. Rotterdam. 277 pp.

Sleeman, JR, & Downes, RG 1950. Part 1: Soil survey of proposed irrigation area – Narromine, NSW. Div. Soils

Rept. 3/50 CSIRO, Adelaide.

Taylor, S. 1994. Macquarie River catchment land management proposal for the integrated treatment and

prevention of land degradation, Macquarie River catchment – CaLM, Sydney.

Torgersen, T., Habermehl, MA, Phillips, FM, Elmore, D, Kubik, P, Jones, BG, Hemmick, T, Gove, HE 1991.

Chlorine-36 dating of very old groundwater 3. Further studies in the Great Artesian basin, Australia. Water

Resour. Res.

Vine RR, 1969 Hydrological implications of recent geological work in the Great Artesian Basin. BMR Research,

1969/56

Vogel JC 1967 Investigation of groundwater flow with radiocarbon. In: Isotopes in hydrology. International

Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna pp 355-369.

Wasson RJ, & Clark RL, 1988 The Quaternary in Australia – past, present and future. Quaternary Australasia

6(1):17-22.

Welsh, WD, 2000. GABFLOW: A steady state groundwater flow model of the Great Artesian Basin. Bureau of

Rural Science, Canberra

Welsh WD, 2006, Great Artesian Basin transient groundwater model. Bureau of Rural Science, Canberra.

Page 61: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin

61

Wilson JL, & Guan H, 2004 Mountain-Block Hydrology and Mountain-Front Recharge. In: Hogan, J. F.,

Phillips, F. M., and Scanlon, B. R., eds., Groundwater recharge in a desert environment: the southwestern United

States: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Applications Series, v. 9, p. 113-

137.

Wolfgang, C. 2000. Hydrogeology of the Pilliga sandstone, Coonamble Embayment and water resource

management. PhD Thesis, Fenner School of Environment, The Australian National University.

Woods, PH 1990. Evaporative discharge of groundwater from the margin of the Great Artesian Basin near Lake

Eyre, South Australia. PhD Thesis, Flinders University of SA.

Woods, P.H., Walker, G.R., Allison, G.B. 1990. Estimating groundwater at the southern margin of the Great

Artesian Basin near Lake Eyre, South Australia. Proc. Intl. Conf. Groundwater in Large Sedimentary Basins,

Perth WA 9-13 July, 1991, AWRC.

Zhang L (Ed) 1998. The basics of recharge and discharge. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia

Zhang, M., Frape, SK, Love, AJ, Herczeg, AL, Lehmann, BE, Bayerle, U, Pertschert, R. 2007. Chlorine stable

isotope studies of old groundwater, southwestern Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Applied Geochem. 22, 557-

574.

Websites that have information on the GAB

http://www.gab.org.au/

http://www.affa.gov.au/content/output.cfm?ObjectID=D2C48F86-BA1A-11A1-A2200060B0A05660

http://www.atse.org.au/index.php?sectionid=404 (Lance Endersbee)

Page 62: Review of recharge mechanisms for the Great Artesian Basin