59
Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix I

Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Cover Image TK

Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element

Appendix i

Page 2: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Photo TK

Page 3: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and ProgramsThe following section identifies each goal, objective, and policy of the previous Housing Element and evaluates its effectiveness and appropriateness. Related policies are grouped together for purposes of this evaluation.

A. REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING POLICIES

It is the overall housing goal of the City of Los Angeles to create for all residents a city of livable and sustainable neighborhoods with a range of housing types, sizes and costs in proximity to jobs, amenities and services. In keeping with decades of federal Housing Acts and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that declared housing as a human right, the City will work towards assuring that housing is provided to all residents.

goAl 1: A City where housing production and preservation result in an adequate supply of ownership and rental housing that is safe, healthy, sanitary and affordable to people of all income levels, races, ages, and suitable for their various needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: This objective supported the overall goals of the General Plan and highlighted the importance of decent, affordable housing supply for all.

Appropriateness: Continue focus on an adequate supply of ownership and rental housing.

objective 1.1

Plan the capacity and develop incentives for the production of an adequate supply of rental and ownership housing for households of all income levels and needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal, but planning (“plan the capacity”) efforts are better addressed separately under the existing forecasting objective.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-3

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 4: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Appropriateness: Re-focus objective on increasing production for current and projected housing needs. Move “plan the capacity” language to Objective 1.3.

Policies

1.1.1 Promote home ownership opportunities and support current homeowners in retaining their homeowner status.

Progress/Effectiveness: Supports the goal of homeownership, but “promote” does not fully capture the work being done on the issue.

Appropriateness: Continue, with the word “expand” rather than “promote.”

1.1.2 Promote affordable rental housing for all income groups that need assistance.

Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal of affordable rental housing, but “promote” does not fully capture the City’s work on this issue. Recent losses of financial resources and other tools for the production of affordable rental housing are likely to take a toll on supply without compensatory action.

Appropriateness: Continue, with “expand” rather than “promote.” Look for innovative ways to increase the supply of affordable housing through programs.

1.1.3 Facilitate new construction of a variety of housing types that address current and projected needs of the city’s households.

Progress/Effectiveness: Described goal of providing a variety of different types of housing needs of a diverse population, but should acknowledge options beyond new construction to increase supply of these units. The dissolution of the Community Redevelopment Authority of the City of Los Angeles (CRA/LA) will likely impact the implementation of this policy.

Appropriateness: Revise to include preservation and retrofit/remodel program options relating to this policy.

1.1.4 Expand location options for residential development, particularly in designated Centers, Transit Oriented Districts and along Mixed-Use Boulevards.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy supported goal of expanding opportunities for residential uses in areas designated for growth in the Framework Element. However the phrase “expand location” may make it appear that the policy is solely about allowing residential uses in new places.

I-4 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 5: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Appropriateness: Begin revised policy with “Expand opportunities for...” to encompass programs that involve things like code flexibility or government facilitation.

1.1.5 Develop financial resources for new construction of affordable housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy highlighted the importance of pursuing financing of affordable housing.

Appropriateness: Continue unchanged.

1.1.6 Facilitate innovative models that reduce land, materials and labor costs.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy acknowledged that new models of development are needed to reduce construction costs. However, programs on material and labor costs have been lost due to the dissolution of the CRA/LA.

Appropriateness: Continue with focus on land and construction costs

1.1.7 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to develop affordable housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: While City programs that directly strengthen the capacity of the development community are limited, the City’s retains the policy of providing technical assistance and capacity building when possible.

Appropriateness: Retain policy.

objective 1.2

Develop incentives for the preservation of quality rental and ownership housing for households of all income levels and special needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: This preservation objective related back to Goal 1, however the “develop incentives” language does not capture all the tactics and strategies being employed to preserve housing. New preservation policy on affordable housing at transit stops needed.

Appropriateness: Broaden language to simply state: “Preserve quality rental...” Add new preservation policy (1.2.7) near transit stops.

Policies

1.2.1 Facilitate the maintenance of existing housing in decent, safe, healthy, and sanitary condition.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-5

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 6: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy supported the objective by promoting a safe and healthy living environment.

Appropriateness: Retain without any changes.

1.2.2 Encourage and incentivize the preservation of affordable housing to ensure that demolitions and conversions do not result in the net loss of the City’s stock of decent, safe, healthy, sanitary, or affordable housing. Encourage but not require one-for-one replacement of demolished affordable units, except as mandated by law or ordinance.

Progress/Effectiveness: Highlighted the important role of condo conversions and demolitions in the loss of (non-subsidized) affordable housing. But the specificity and length may cloud the policy focus.

Appropriateness: Shorten and broaden to include facilitation of preservation.

1.2.3 Rehabilitate and/or replace substandard housing with housing that is decent, safe, healthy, sanitary and affordable and of appropriate size to meet the City’s current and future household needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: Focused on correcting substandard housing, which relates to the preservation objective.

Appropriateness: Retain, however remove the word sanitary as it is redundant.

1.2.4 Plan for post-disaster reconstruction of housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: Important policy, however it relates more towards the planning objective (1.3) than preservation.

Appropriateness: Move policy under objective 1.3.

1.2.5 Develop financial resources for the long-term affordability of publicly assisted rental and ownership housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy pursued financial resources for the preservation of assisted housing.

Appropriateness: Retain policy.

1.2.6 Provide incentives that extend affordability to existing market rate housing units.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy concentrated on extending affordability to market-rate units.

I-6 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 7: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Appropriateness: Retain policy.

1.2.7 Provide incentives for the preservation of historic residential structures.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy expresses support for incentivizing historic preservation.

Appropriateness: Retain policy.

1.2.8 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to preserve and manage affordable housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy refers to the importance of good property management in maintaining a quality housing stock. Activities remain in this area.

Appropriateness: Retain

objective 1.3

Forecast changing housing needs over time in relation to production and preservation needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: This objective refers to the importance of forecasting housing needs over time in setting housing policy and priorities. Along with forecasting, planning for meeting the housing needs should be included under this objective.

Appropriateness: Continue, incorporating planning efforts around housing.

Policies

1.3.1 Monitor the production and preservation of the housing supply.

Progress/Effectiveness: Monitoring production and preservation results is key to having the necessary information to undertake basic housing analysis. However, the importance of publicly reporting the information should be included as well.

Appropriateness: Include reporting alongside monitoring in the policy.

1.3.2 Advocate for the production of data necessary for the City’s planning purposes, particularly with regard to special needs populations.

Progress/Effectiveness: Advocating for additional data and to retain the data sources that are being threatened are both important parts of being able to forecast and plan. However this policy should also include collaboration for the production of data.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-7

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 8: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Appropriateness: Add collaborate alongside advocate for the production of data.

1.3.3 Collect, report and project citywide and local housing needs on a periodic basis.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy refers to compiling socio-economic and other data for planning purposes. Budgetary constraints have impacted the ability to meet data collection and reporting objectives.

Appropriateness: No change to wording.

objective 1.4

Promote an equitable distribution of affordable housing opportunities throughout the City.

Progress/Effectiveness: Reflected the importance of where affordable housing is produced and working towards trying to be more equitable in its distribution.

Appropriateness: Continue with minor text change (“more equitable”). Also move under Goal 2, which is more about the location and qualities of residential growth.

Policies

1.4.1 Provide incentives to include affordable housing in residential development, particularly in mixed use development, Transit Oriented Districts and designated Centers.

Progress/Effectiveness: Incentives remain an important way to carry out the objective of achieving affordable housing in the City’s designated growth areas. The policy reflected the Framework Element Policy 4.2.1. However the issue is more than just about “equitable distribution,” as it touches on mobility, economic development, sustainability, etc.

Appropriateness: Retain wording as-is, but move, along with Objective 1.4 under Goal 2.

1.4.2 Promote the development of new affordable housing units citywide and within each Community Plan area.

Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relates to the objective by noting that each community has a need for affordable housing.

Appropriateness: Continue with a renewed emphasis of finding ways to promote and incentivize mixed-income developments in all areas of the City, but move, along with Objective 1.4 under Goal 2.

I-8 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 9: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

objective 1.5

Reduce regulatory and procedural barriers to the production and preservation of housing at all income levels and needs.

Progress/Effectiveness: Though progress has been made towards reducing regulatory and procedural barriers, much remains to be done and the objective remains relevant. However there is some concern that the provision of certain

Appropriateness: Objective will remain unchanged.

Policies

1.5.1 Streamline the land use entitlement, environmental review, and building permit processes.

Progress/Effectiveness: Streamlining these related city processes remains an effective policy to meet the larger objective.

Appropriateness: No change.

1.5.2 Streamline affordable housing funding processes.

Progress/Effectiveness: Better coordinating funding processes remains relevant and meets the objective.

Appropriateness: No change.

goAl 2: A City in which housing helps to create safe, livable and sustainable neighborhoods.

Progress/Effectiveness: This goal reflects the important linkages between housing and creating sustainable, healthy, and livable communities. A good deal of progress has been made in this area in recent years.

Appropriateness: No change to this goal is needed.

objective 2.1

Promote safety and health within neighborhoods.

Progress/Effectiveness: Reflected the opportunities to promote healthy communities through development standards.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote safe and healthy neighborhoods.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-9

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 10: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Policies

2.1.1 Establish development standards and policing practices that reduce the likelihood of crime.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy focusing on public safety remains relevant to livability and quality of life.

Appropriateness: Retain.

2.1.2 Establish development standards that enhance health outcomes.

Progress/Effectiveness: The important intersections of health and housing are becoming better appreciated. Progress is occurring beyond just the development of development standards.

Appropriateness: Continue, with a broadening to include measures beyond standards and guidelines.

objective 2.2

Promote sustainable neighborhoods that have mixed-income housing, jobs, amenities, services and transit.

Progress/Effectiveness: This objective delineated important elements of sustainable neighborhoods and relates strongly to the overall goal.

Appropriateness: Retain without any changes.

Policies

2.2.1 Provide incentives to encourage the integration of housing with other compatible land uses.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy reflected the importance of mixed-use development and mixed-use neighborhoods in achieving sustainable neighborhoods.

Appropriateness: Retain the focus on integrating housing with other compatible land uses.

2.2.2 Develop design standards that promote sustainable development in public and private open space and street rights-of-way (ROW).

Progress/Effectiveness: Appropriate design standards have been an important way the City has promoted livable and sustainable places to live

I-10 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 11: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

in recent years. Related to Objective 2.2, however may be more logically located beneath Objective 2.4 which is explicitly about “quality design” to promote livable neighborhoods. Also the policy could be broadened a bit beyond just promoting sustainable development to promoting linkages between housing and open space and recreational areas.

Appropriateness: Continue to pursue appropriate design standards for the public way but move under Objective 2.4. Add sentence on increasing access to open space, parks and green spaces.

2.2.3 Provide incentives and flexibility to generate new housing and to preserve existing housing near transit.

Progress/Effectiveness: Generating additional housing with access to nearby transit remains a core element of the City’s growth strategy. However, equal emphasis on producing and preserving housing near transit equally may result in some confusion amongst decision makers when redevelopment projects come forward.

Appropriateness: Remove “preserve existing housing” from this policy, however include a new policy on preserving affordable housing near transit (1.2.8). Also combine Policies 2.2.3 and 2.2.6, to include encouraging housing in near transit-oriented communities and designated centers.

2.2.4 Promote and facilitate a jobs/housing balance at a citywide level.

Progress/Effectiveness: This policy helps to meet housing goals as well as mobility, sustainability and economic objectives.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote housing in jobs-rich areas and vice-versa.

2.2.5 Educate the public to understand and support the benefits of mixed-use and mixed-income communities to accommodate projected growth.

Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal and the need for education on growth issues. This supported efforts to accommodate all housing needs and sustainability across the City.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote outreach and education regarding housing rights, responsibilities and opportunities and inform communities of special needs populations in the City and the effective approaches to meeting their housing needs.

2.2.6 To accommodate projected growth to 2014 in a sustainable way, encourage housing in centers and near transit, in accordance with the General Plan Framework Element, as reflected in Map ES.1.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-11

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 12: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relevant to the goals articulated in the General Plan Framework. However this policy is very similar to Policy 2.2.3 and the two can be combined.

Appropriateness: Combine Policies 2.2.3 and 2.2.6, to include encouraging housing in near transit-oriented communities and designated centers.

objective 2.3

Promote sustainable buildings, which minimize adverse effects on the environment and minimize the use of non-renewable resources.

Policies

2.3.1 Streamline entitlement, environmental, and permitting processes for sustainable buildings.

2.3.2 Promote and facilitate reduction of water consumption in new and existing housing.

2.3.3 Promote and facilitate reduction of energy consumption in new and existing housing.

2.3.4 Promote and facilitate reduction of waste in construction and building operations.

2.3.5 Promote outreach and education regarding sustainable buildings.

Progress/Effectiveness: Facilitating the reduction of water, energy and waste in the development process relates directly to Goal 2. Streamlining City processes and promoting outreach and education are two key areas where the City can help.

Appropriateness: Continue to deepen the City’s commitment to sustainability in new and existing housing.

objective 2.4

Promote livable neighborhoods with a mix of housing types, quality design and a scale and character that respects unique residential neighborhoods in the City.

Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relates to Goal 2 and has been a particularly active area in recent years.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote a mix of housing types, quality design and respect of neighborhood character.

I-12 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 13: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Policies

2.4.1 Provide sufficient services and amenities to support the planned population while preserving the neighborhood for those currently there.

Progress/Effectiveness: Services and amenities help create livable and sustainable neighborhoods, therefore connecting to Goal 2. Related to Objective 2.4, however may be more logically located beneath Objective 2.2 which is explicitly mentions access to amenities and services.

Appropriateness: Continue to pursue this policy but move under Objective 2.2.

2.4.2 Develop and implement design standards that promote quality development.

Progress/Effectiveness: Highlighted the important role of standards in promoting livable sustainable neighborhoods. Many design guidelines and standards have been completed in the planning period.

Appropriateness: Continue to develop and implement design standards in residential development.

2.4.3 Promote preservation of neighborhood character in balance with facilitating new development.

Progress/Effectiveness: Preservation of neighborhood character remains vital to the city’s housing goals. A number of neighborhood preservation tools have been developed and expanded during the planning period.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote the preservation of neighborhood character.

2.4.4 Promote residential development that meets the needs of current residents as well as new residents.

Progress/Effectiveness: Development should certainly strive to meet the needs of residents, however this policy lacks specificity and is therefore redundant with much of the existing objectives and policies. Progresses on implementation actions related to the policy have halted with the dissolution of the CRA/LA.

Appropriateness: Delete policy, as its essence is already reflected in many other goals, objectives and policies.

goAl 3: A City where there are housing opportunities for all without discrimination.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-13

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 14: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Progress/Effectiveness: Goal articulated a vision that remains an important goal for the City.

Appropriateness: Should continue without change.

objective 3.1

Assure that housing opportunities are accessible to all residents without discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, sex, national origin, color, religion, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, age, disability (including HIV/AIDS), and student status.

Progress/Effectiveness: Objective remains a cornerstone of promoting fair housing and opportunities for all.

Appropriateness: Continue.

Policies

3.1.1 Promote and facilitate equal opportunity practices in the sale and rental of housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: An effective policy to carry out the objective. However the policy could be broadened beyond the point of sale and rental of housing, to include the construction and provision of housing. Related programs already reflect this more expansive approach.

Appropriateness: Broaden to include promotion of equal opportunity, fair housing and accessibility in all areas of housing.

3.1.2 Promote responsible mortgage lending that meets community credit needs and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).

Progress/Effectiveness: An important component of promoting housing opportunities for all.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote responsible mortgage lending as part of promoting equal opportunity.

objective 3.2

Promote fair housing practices and accessibility among residents, community stakeholders and those involved in the production, preservation and operation of housing.

I-14 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 15: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Progress/Effectiveness: This objective supported the goal and the need for housing opportunities for all people, including those with special needs.

Appropriateness: Continue to promote fair housing practices and accessibility.

Policies

3.2.1 Provide outreach and education for homebuyers and renters regarding rights, financing options, rental subsidies available and protections in the purchase, rental and/or modification of housing units.

Progress/Effectiveness: Delineated important tasks of the City in promoting fair housing practices, thereby relating to the objective.

Appropriateness: No change.

3.2.2 Provide outreach and education for the broader community of residents, residential property owners and operators regarding fair housing practices and requirements.

Progress/Effectiveness: Outreach and education on fair housing remains an important task. Progress was limited in the planning period.

Appropriateness: Continue to provide outreach and education on fair housing practices.

3.2.3 Collect and report findings on discrimination in the sale and rental of housing.

Progress/Effectiveness: Research on housing discrimination is being collected and is an important part of promoting fair housing practices.

Appropriateness: Continue to collect and disseminate findings on housing discrimination.

goAl 4: A City committed to preventing and ending homelessness.

objective 4.1

Provide an adequate supply of short-term and permanent housing and services throughout the City that are appropriate and meet the special needs of persons who are homeless or who are at high risk of homelessness.

4.1.1 Ensure an adequate supply of emergency and temporary housing for people who become homeless or are at a high risk of becoming homeless, including special needs populations.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-15

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 16: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Progress/Effectiveness: Objective and Policy supporting an adequate supply of short-term and permanent housing is critical to meeting the Goal of preventing and ending homelessness.

Appropriateness: Continue both, with minor clarification language.

4.1.2 Promote and facilitate programs and strategies that ensure the rapid return to housing of all special needs populations who become homeless.

Progress/Effectiveness: Policy focuses on re-rapidly housing special needs populations; however the only program associated with the policy focuses on all priority occupancy for all homeless persons.

Appropriateness: Retain, but broaden to focus on rapid re-housing of all populations. Catering housing and services to those with special needs is found in Policy 4.1.3.

4.1.3 Provide permanent supportive housing options for homeless persons and special needs households with services such as job training and placement programs, treatment, rehabilitation and personal management training to assure that they remain housed.

Progress/Effectiveness: Combining housing with services is a key strategy to preventing and ending homelessness. Many effective programs support this policy.

Appropriateness: Continue, without the need for specifically listing out the types of services that may be required, as many more types of services would need to be added.

4.1.4 Promote and facilitate a planning process that includes providers of housing and services for the homeless.

Progress/Effectiveness: Planning and coordination has improved and is essential to the effective coordination and use of limited resources.

Appropriateness: Can be made more effective by broadening those involved in the planning process and explaining the reason for facilitating a broad process.

4.1.5 Plan for emergency housing needs that will result from natural or man-made disasters.

Progress/Effectiveness: Disaster can quickly and dramatically create homelessness. Planning for emergency housing needs is critical to ensuring an effective response.

Appropriateness: Retain without change.

I-16 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 17: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

4.1.6 Eliminate zoning and other regulatory barriers to the placement and operation of housing facilities for the homeless and special needs populations in appropriate locations throughout the City.

Progress/Effectiveness: The City has been largely effective in eliminating zoning and other regulatory barriers to the placement of housing facilities for the homeless and special needs populations.

Appropriateness: Retain without change.

objective 4.2

Promote outreach and education to: homeless populations; residents; community stakeholders; health, social service and housing providers and funders; criminal justice system agencies; and, communities in which facilities and services may be located

4.2.1 Inform homeless persons and persons at risk of homelessness of their rights and assist them in accessing services to which they are entitled.

4.2.2 Inform communities about special needs populations in the City and effective approaches to meeting their housing needs

Progress/Effectiveness: The Objective and Policies surrounding providing outreach and information to homeless persons and communities are important to the goal of preventing and ending homelessness.

Appropriateness: Retain without changes.

4.2.3 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to locate, construct and manage housing facilities for the homeless.

Progress/Effectiveness: Maximizing the capacity of the homeless housing and service development community is critical to the objective.

Appropriateness: Retain

4.2.4 Provide a high level of outreach targeted to the chronically homeless to move them from the streets into permanent housing with appropriate support services.

Progress/Effectiveness: Outreach to the homeless, particularly the chronically homeless, is critical to meeting the goals.

Appropriateness: Retain

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-17

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 18: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

1A. H

omeb

uyer

A

ssis

tanc

e: P

urch

ase

Ass

ista

nce

“366

loan

s fo

r low

-in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s

200

loan

s fo

r mod

erat

e-in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s

72 lo

ans

for a

bove

m

oder

ate-

inco

me

hom

ebuy

ers”

“Loa

ns F

unde

d:

Low

Inco

me

- 463

low

Mod

erat

e In

com

e - 2

79 m

od

Abo

ve M

oder

ate

Inco

me

- 82”

This

prog

ram

has

exc

eede

d its

obj

ectiv

e.Re

tain

, how

ever

com

bine

all

hom

ebuy

er

assis

tanc

e pr

ogra

ms

into

one

pro

gram

ca

lled

Hom

ebuy

er A

ssis

tanc

e.

1.1.

1B. H

omeb

uyer

A

ssis

tanc

e: M

ortg

age

Cred

it Ce

rtifi

cate

s (M

CCs)

“168

MCC

s fo

r low

in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s

252

MCC

s fo

r mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s”

“Tot

al M

CCs

issu

ed:

Low

Inco

me

- 249

Mod

erat

e in

com

e - 2

23 “

This

prog

ram

has

exc

eede

d its

obj

ectiv

e fo

r low

in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s an

d is

on tr

ack

to m

eet i

ts

obje

ctiv

e fo

r mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s.

To b

e m

erge

d w

ith H

omeb

uyer

A

ssis

tanc

e: P

urch

ase

Ass

ista

nce.

1.1.

1C. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r A

ssis

tanc

e: F

orw

ard

Com

mitm

ent P

rogr

am

“Con

trac

ts fo

r 30

mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s

Cont

ract

s fo

r 85

abov

e m

oder

ate

inco

me

hom

ebuy

ers”

Forw

ard

Com

mitm

ent p

urch

ase

assis

tanc

e pr

ovid

ed lo

ans

to 3

1 lo

w in

com

e an

d 14

mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s sin

ce 2

006.

This

prog

ram

ass

iste

d lo

wer

and

mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s. P

urch

ase

assis

tanc

e w

as n

ot p

rovi

ded

to a

bove

mod

erat

e in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s be

caus

e de

velo

pmen

t pro

ject

s w

ere

not c

ompl

eted

as

a re

sult

of th

e do

wnt

urn

in th

e ho

usin

g m

arke

t. Ci

ty fu

ndin

g fo

r thi

s pr

ogra

m is

no

long

er a

vaila

ble.

“To

be m

erge

d w

ith H

omeb

uyer

A

ssis

tanc

e: P

urch

ase

Ass

ista

nce.

Mod

ify to

incl

ude

only

Sta

te B

EGIN

gr

ant f

undi

ng to

ass

ist l

ower

and

m

oder

ate

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds.”

1.1.

1D. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r Ass

ista

nce:

Sm

all S

ites

Deve

lopm

ent

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

Fina

nce

for-s

ale

deve

lopm

ents

, pro

vidi

ng

44 lo

w-in

com

e ow

ners

hip

units

Smal

l Site

s De

velo

pmen

t Opp

ortu

nitie

s pr

ovid

ed lo

ans

to 8

5 lo

w-in

com

e ho

meb

uyer

s sin

ce 2

006.

Pro

gram

was

dis

cont

inue

d.Th

is pr

ogra

m h

as e

xcee

ded

its o

bjec

tives

.Re

mov

e. P

rogr

am n

o lo

nger

ava

ilabl

e.

1.1.

1E. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r A

ssis

tanc

e: In

-fill

Hous

ing

Deve

lopm

ent

“45

for-s

ale

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly

5 lo

w in

com

e un

its

annu

ally

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e an

acc

urat

e fig

ure

due

to th

e de

mis

e of

the

Com

mun

ity R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncy/

LA.

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e ov

eral

l effe

ctiv

enes

s du

e to

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A.

Rem

ove.

Pro

gram

has

bee

n di

scon

tinue

d du

e to

dem

ise

of R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncie

s.

1.1.

1F. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r A

ssis

tanc

e: N

ew

Hous

ing

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

“45

for-s

ale

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly

5 fo

r-sal

e lo

w-in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly

in C

RA/L

A Do

wnt

own

proj

ect a

reas

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e an

acc

urat

e fig

ure

due

to th

e de

mis

e of

the

Com

mun

ity R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncy/

LA.

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e ov

eral

l effe

ctiv

enes

s du

e to

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A.

Rem

ove.

Pro

gram

has

bee

n di

scon

tinue

d du

e to

dem

ise

of R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncie

s.

1.1.

1G. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r A

ssis

tanc

e: R

espo

nse

to

Hous

ing

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

“25

for-s

ale

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly

25 fo

r-sal

e lo

w in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly

in C

RA/L

A pr

ojec

t are

as”

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e an

acc

urat

e fig

ure

due

to th

e de

mis

e of

the

Com

mun

ity R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncy/

LA.

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e ov

eral

l effe

ctiv

enes

s du

e to

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A.

Rem

ove.

Pro

gram

has

bee

n di

scon

tinue

d du

e to

dem

ise

of R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncie

s.

I-18 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 19: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

1H. F

or-S

ale

Deve

lope

r Ass

ista

nce:

Sm

all L

ot S

ubdi

visio

ns

314

mar

ket-

rate

un

its w

ithin

sm

all l

ot

subd

ivisi

ons

annu

ally

“App

roxi

mat

ely

184

Smal

l Lot

Sub

divi

sion

deve

lopm

ent p

roje

cts

have

be

en fi

led

with

the

City

sin

ce 2

006,

con

sistin

g of

1,5

27 p

ropo

sed

units

. 629

uni

ts h

ave

been

per

mitt

ed a

s of

the

end

of 2

012.

Out

reac

h to

dev

elop

ers

and

arch

itect

s on

pos

sible

impr

ovem

ents

to

the

prog

ram

’s po

licie

s an

d pr

oced

ures

took

pla

ce. A

list

of i

ssue

ar

eas

was

com

pile

d, a

s w

as a

n up

date

to th

e Sm

all L

ot D

esig

n G

uide

lines

. Wor

k is

expe

cted

to c

ontin

ue th

roug

h 20

13.”

Prod

uctio

n w

as b

elow

exp

ecta

tions

, alth

ough

th

is w

as li

kely

larg

ely

due

to th

e cr

ash

of

the

for-s

ale

hous

ing

mar

ket i

n 20

07. M

ostly

ad

min

istr

ativ

e in

ter-

depa

rtm

enta

l cla

rifica

tions

an

d ad

just

men

ts c

an b

e m

ade

to m

ake

prog

ram

mor

e w

orka

ble

and

effic

ient

.

Reta

in.

1.1.

2A. M

ortg

age

Reve

nue

Bond

Fin

anci

ng fo

r N

ew R

enta

l Hou

sing

“75

low

-inco

me

rent

al

units

and

300

abo

ve

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its

annu

ally,

thro

ugh

CRA

/LA

180

very

low

-inco

me

rent

al

units

, thr

ough

HCI

DLA”

“Sin

ce 2

006,

HCI

DLA

has

issu

ed b

onds

for 3

5 ne

w

cons

truc

tion

(bon

d-on

ly) r

enta

l hou

sing

units

(plu

s a

tota

l of 1

,585

new

con

stru

ctio

n un

its

com

bine

d w

ith A

HTF

fund

s)”

Effe

ctiv

e

Mer

ge w

ith N

ew P

rodu

ctio

n of

Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

prog

ram

. Bet

wee

n ne

w c

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

b bo

nd

prog

ram

s, o

bjec

tive

is fo

r 1,0

00

new

or r

ehab

bed

low

-inco

me

units

an

d 12

0 ve

ry lo

w-in

com

e un

its.

1.1.

2B. A

fford

able

Hou

sing

Trus

t Fun

d (A

HTF)

for

New

Ren

tal H

ousin

g

“4,7

89 v

ery

low

in

com

e un

its

479

low

inco

me

units

From

200

6 to

pre

sent

84

new

con

stru

ctio

n pr

ojec

ts fu

ndin

g 3,

997

very

low

inco

me

units

at 5

0% o

r bel

ow a

nd a

n ad

ditio

nal

1,58

9 lo

w in

com

e un

its b

etw

een

50%

to 6

0% A

MI.

Very

effe

ctiv

e, c

lose

to m

eetin

g ve

ry lo

w

inco

me

unit

goal

and

exc

eedi

ng lo

w in

com

e un

it go

al. G

oing

forw

ard

HCID

LA w

ill h

ave

a se

vere

redu

ctio

n in

fund

ing

caus

ing

a re

duct

ion

in a

fford

able

uni

t pro

duct

ion.

Reta

in

1.1.

2C. N

ew R

enta

l Ho

usin

g O

ppor

tuni

ties

“70

very

low

inco

me,

70 lo

w in

com

e, a

nd

60 m

oder

ate

inco

me

rent

al u

nits

ann

ually

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e an

acc

urat

e fig

ure

due

to th

e de

mis

e of

the

Com

mun

ity R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncy/

LA.

N/A

- Pr

ogra

m h

as b

een

disc

ontin

ued

due

to d

emis

e of

Red

evel

opm

ent A

genc

ies.

Rem

ove

1.1.

2D. R

espo

nse

to R

enta

l Ho

usin

g O

ppor

tuni

ties

“50

very

low

inco

me,

50 lo

w in

com

e, a

nd

50 m

oder

ate

inco

me

rent

al

units

app

rove

d an

nual

ly

in C

RA/L

A pr

ojec

t are

as”

Una

ble

to d

eter

min

e an

acc

urat

e fig

ure

due

to th

e de

mis

e of

the

Com

mun

ity R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncy/

LA.

N/A

- Pr

ogra

m h

as b

een

disc

ontin

ued

due

to d

emis

e of

Red

evel

opm

ent A

genc

ies.

Rem

ove

1.1.

2E. P

roje

ct-B

ased

Re

ntal

Ass

ista

nce

“1,0

74 (4

30 e

xtre

mel

y lo

w, 6

44 v

ery

low

inco

me)

ho

useh

olds

hou

sed

thro

ugh

proj

ect-

base

d re

ntal

ass

ista

nce

vouc

hers

745

low

inco

me

units

of

rent

al h

ousin

g”

HAC

LA h

as a

tota

l of 2

,505

allo

cate

d un

its.

Very

effe

ctiv

e, e

xcee

ding

obj

ectiv

e.Re

tain

1.1.

2F. N

ew G

ener

atio

n Fu

nd—

New

Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Supp

ort t

he c

onst

ruct

ion

of 2

,560

new

uni

ts$3

3.2

mill

ion

has

been

inve

sted

thro

ugh

the

New

Gen

erat

ion

Fund

, res

ultin

g in

662

affo

rdab

le u

nits

cre

ated

or p

rese

rved

.

The

New

Gen

erat

ion

Fund

has

bee

n an

im

port

ant s

ourc

e of

fund

ing

for n

ew a

fford

able

ho

usin

g. T

he p

rogr

am h

as b

een

mod

ified

to

bett

er a

ddre

ss th

e ga

p in

pre

deve

lopm

ent a

nd

acqu

isitio

n fu

nds

that

the

clos

ing

of C

RA/L

A cr

eate

d. A

lso

To m

axim

ize

effe

ctiv

enes

s HC

IDLA

ha

s al

igne

d th

is fu

nd w

ith th

e pe

rman

ent

fund

ing

sour

ces

avai

labl

e to

thes

e pr

ojec

ts.

Cont

inue

, with

min

or c

hang

es to

prio

ritie

s.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-19

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 20: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

3A. H

ousin

g fo

r Sen

ior

and

Disa

bled

Per

sons

“50

units

for v

ery

low

in

com

e se

nior

s an

nual

ly

50 u

nits

for v

ery

low

inco

me

disa

bled

pe

rson

s an

nual

ly”

“The

City

ado

pted

the

Elde

r Fac

ilitie

s O

rdin

ance

in 2

006.

Thi

s O

rdin

ance

cre

ates

a s

ingl

e ap

prov

al p

roce

ss fo

r Alz

heim

er’s

/Dem

entia

Ca

re H

ousin

g, A

ssis

ted

Livi

ng C

are

Hous

ing,

Sen

ior I

ndep

ende

nt

Hous

ing

and

Skill

ed N

ursin

g Ca

re H

ousin

g. T

he O

rdin

ance

per

mits

th

is us

e in

zon

es w

here

the

Faci

lity

does

not

mee

t the

use

, hei

ght o

r ar

ea p

rovi

sions

of t

he u

nder

lyin

g zo

ning

, with

Zon

ing

Adm

inis

trat

or

findi

ngs.

The

Ord

inan

ce a

lso

perm

its fe

wer

par

king

spa

ces

than

ot

herw

ise

requ

ired.

DCP

has

rece

ived

app

licat

ions

for 1

2 El

derc

are

Faci

litie

s sin

ce 2

006,

repr

esen

ting

1047

new

sen

ior h

ousin

g un

its.

CRA

Activ

ity: 1

3 se

nior

-orie

nted

pro

ject

s w

ere

com

plet

ed, i

n co

nstr

uctio

n or

in p

re-d

evel

opm

ent a

s of

201

0 to

talin

g 18

85

units

, inc

ludi

ng 1

765

affo

rdab

le u

nits

for s

enio

rs a

nd/o

r dis

able

d pe

rson

s (8

ext

rem

ely

low

inco

me,

194

ver

y lo

w in

com

e, 3

09 lo

w

inco

me,

32

mod

erat

e in

com

e an

d 10

93 c

anno

t be

dete

rmin

ed).

HAC

LA h

as h

elpe

d cr

eate

223

Sen

ior u

nits

in 2

pro

ject

s in

Wilm

ingt

on a

nd W

est L

os A

ngel

es a

s w

ell a

s 57

sen

ior

and

disa

bled

uni

ts in

N. H

olly

woo

d an

d So

uth

LA.

LADB

S ha

s cr

eate

d tw

o pr

ogra

ms

to e

xped

ite p

erm

ittin

g pr

oces

ses

for q

ualifi

ed p

roje

cts

of a

cer

tain

siz

e.

Thre

shol

ds w

ere

mad

e lo

wer

for s

enio

r pro

ject

s.”

“Lar

gely

effe

ctiv

e at

mee

ting

prod

uctio

n go

als,

ho

wev

er th

e de

mis

e of

the

CRA

/LA

will

like

ly c

ut

affo

rdab

le s

enio

r pro

duct

ion

in th

e co

min

g ye

ars.

All

Elde

rcar

e pr

ojec

ts h

ave

been

100

%

mar

ket-

rate

. Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d co

mpa

tibili

ty

has

also

bee

n qu

estio

ned

on s

ome

proj

ects

in

larg

ely

singl

e-fa

mily

nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds.”

Cont

inue

with

out C

RA in

volv

emen

t. Ad

d re

cent

per

mit

stre

amlin

ing

mea

sure

s in

to p

rogr

am. L

ook

into

feas

ibili

ty o

f in

clud

ing

affo

rdab

ility

and

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d co

mpa

tibili

ty c

ompo

nent

s to

Eld

erca

re

Faci

litie

s O

rdin

ance

. Con

sider

way

s to

faci

litat

e th

e pr

oduc

tion

of u

nits

fo

r sen

ior a

nd th

e di

sabl

ed th

roug

h th

e LI

HTC

proc

ess,

as

the

City

will

so

on h

ave

cont

rol o

ver s

ettin

g po

licie

s fo

r its

ow

n ap

port

ionm

ent.

1.1.

3B. H

ousin

g fo

r All

Hous

ehol

d Si

zes

and

Type

s

“75

larg

e fa

mily

low

in

com

e un

its

75 s

mal

l low

inco

me

units

“HAC

LA A

ctiv

ity: A

cqui

red

98 u

nits

of l

ow/m

oder

ate

inco

me

apar

tmen

t 4-b

edro

om u

nits

at 1

2100

She

ldon

Ave

nue,

Nor

th

Holly

woo

d (2

008)

. Acq

uire

d tw

o 4

bedr

oom

tow

nhom

es o

f pub

lic

hous

ing

in W

atts

(201

0). A

cqui

red

twel

ve 4

bed

room

tow

nhom

es

of p

ublic

hou

sing

in W

atts

. Acq

uire

d 1

singl

e fa

mily

resid

ence

as

pub

lic h

ousin

g in

Wat

ts (2

011)

. Acq

uire

d 20

resid

entia

l uni

ts

of p

ublic

hou

sing

in 1

5 se

para

te p

rope

rtie

s in

Wat

ts (2

012)

.

CRA

Activ

ity: O

ver 3

0 pr

ojec

ts w

ere

com

plet

ed, u

nder

con

stru

ctio

n or

in p

rede

velo

pmen

t in

2010

tota

ling

3,44

6 un

its, i

nclu

ding

ov

er 2

,805

affo

rdab

le u

nits

(at l

east

329

affo

rdab

le fa

mily

uni

ts,

488

effic

ienc

y un

its a

nd a

t lea

st 1

,093

1-b

edro

om u

nits

).”

“Muc

h of

this

wor

k fe

ll to

the

CRA

/LA

, w

hich

mea

ns th

at p

rodu

ctio

n in

this

area

is

likel

y to

dec

line

with

out a

rene

wed

focu

s.

HAC

LA re

port

s cu

rren

tly h

avin

g no

pla

ns to

ac

quire

or f

or d

evel

opm

ent o

f hou

sing

othe

r th

an p

ublic

hou

sing

rede

velo

pmen

t.”

Rem

ove

give

n th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

and

lack

of H

ACLA

pla

ns. H

CIDL

A’s

com

mitm

ent t

o la

rge

fam

ilies

is m

entio

ned

in n

ew p

rogr

am 6

New

Pro

duct

ion

of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g. A

lso

adde

d la

rge

fam

ily p

rodu

ctio

n to

52

Mon

itor a

nd

Upd

ate

the

Dens

ity B

onus

pro

gram

.

1.1.

3C. I

nnov

ativ

e Ho

usin

g U

nit D

esig

n

“50

very

low

inco

me

units

of a

ltern

ativ

e m

ulti-

fam

ily h

ousin

g

50 v

ery

low

inco

me

units

with

uni

vers

al

desig

n el

emen

ts

Prov

ide

assis

tanc

e to

dev

eloe

prs

and

prop

erty

ow

ners

dur

ing

proj

ect r

evie

w”

The

prop

osed

Tas

k Fo

rce

and

reco

mm

enda

tions

for r

evis

ed

regu

latio

ns h

as re

mai

ned

on h

old

pend

ing

budg

et a

nd

staf

f res

ourc

es th

roug

hout

the

plan

ning

per

iod.

Has

not b

een

effe

ctiv

e at

mee

ting

obje

ctiv

es.

Cont

inue

the

goal

of p

rom

otin

g in

nova

tive

units

des

ign,

with

a re

new

ed fo

cus

on

assis

ting

the

elde

rly to

“ag

e in

pla

ce.”

I-20 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Page 21: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

3D. A

ltern

ativ

e M

ulti-

Fam

ily D

evel

opm

ent

“20

seco

nd u

nits

on

lots

an

nual

ly, in

clud

ing

6 lo

w in

com

e un

its,

7 m

oder

ate

inco

me

units

and

7 ab

ove-

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its”

At le

ast 1

87 s

econ

d un

its o

n a

lot w

ere

appr

oved

from

200

6 to

20

11, p

ursu

ant t

o A

B 18

66. N

one

wer

e kn

own

to b

e af

ford

able

.

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh g

oals

are

rela

tivel

y m

odes

t for

a C

ity th

is la

rge.

Af

ford

abili

ty c

ompo

nent

not

effe

ctiv

e.

Prog

ram

ove

rlaps

with

1.5

.1 J.

Mod

ifica

tions

to

Sec

ond

Uni

t (“G

rann

y Fl

at”)

Pro

cess

Mer

ge p

rogr

am w

ith 1

.5.1

J. M

odifi

catio

ns

to S

econ

d U

nit (

“Gra

nny

Flat

”) P

roce

ss.

Look

for w

ays

to e

xpan

d ap

plic

abili

ty.

1.1.

3E. N

ew P

rogr

ams

to

Incr

ease

the

Prod

uctio

n of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

gIn

trod

uce

Mot

ion

Actio

ns o

n th

e pr

opos

ed m

ixed

inco

me

(incl

usio

nary

zon

ing)

or

dina

nce

was

hal

ted

due

to th

e Pa

lmer

Vs.

Los

Ang

eles

cou

rt c

ase

in 2

009,

whi

ch ru

led

that

affo

rdab

ility

requ

irem

ents

in n

ew re

ntal

co

nstr

uctio

n w

ere

cont

rary

to th

e St

ate’

s Co

sta-

Haw

kins

Act

.

Not

effe

ctiv

e du

e to

lega

l act

ion.

Rem

ove.

1.1.

3F. S

mal

l Site

s fo

r Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

“Rep

ort t

o M

ayor

an

d Ci

ty C

ounc

il

Draf

t ord

inan

ce,

polic

ies,

pro

cedu

res

as

dete

rmin

ed in

stu

dy”

No

activ

ity w

as re

port

ed.

Not

effe

ctiv

e.

Rem

ove,

as

prov

ision

s fo

r sm

all s

ites

alre

ady

exis

t in

the

Zoni

ng C

ode,

in

clud

ing

Smal

l Lot

Sub

divi

sion

and

cert

ain

exce

ptio

ns g

rant

ed to

sm

all l

ots

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t pro

cess

. Pro

gram

la

cked

focu

s on

wha

t cou

ld b

e do

ne.

1.1.

4A. A

dapt

ive

Reus

e“4

50 m

arke

t rat

e an

d

50 a

fford

able

hou

sing

units

ann

ually

A to

tal o

f 92

build

ing

perm

its c

onta

inin

g 4,

127

units

ha

ve b

een

issu

ed fo

r Ada

ptiv

e Re

use

proj

ects

sin

ce 2

006.

A

n ad

ditio

nal 5

pro

ject

s w

ith 4

41 p

ropo

sed

units

wer

e kn

own

to b

e in

pre

-dev

elop

men

t in

late

201

2.

Prog

ram

has

bee

n ve

ry e

ffect

ive,

how

ever

the

pace

of p

roje

cts

has

slow

ed c

onsid

erab

ly in

re

cent

yea

rs -

part

ially

due

to th

e ec

onom

ic

dow

ntur

n bu

t als

o be

caus

e la

nd c

osts

ha

ve ri

sen

cons

ider

ably

and

bui

ldin

gs ri

pe

for c

onve

rsio

n ar

e ha

rder

to c

ome

by

Cont

inue

, but

exp

lore

add

ition

al in

cent

ives

to

faci

litat

e ad

aptiv

e re

use,

suc

h as

re

duce

d m

inim

um u

nit s

izes

, or s

hare

d/pu

blic

ly d

evel

oped

par

king

opp

ortu

nitie

s to

sup

port

pro

pose

d de

velo

pmen

ts.

1.1.

4B. R

edev

elop

men

t of

City

-Ow

ned

Prop

erty

“Pos

t upd

ated

inve

ntor

y of

City

-ow

ned

prop

erty

at

leas

t onc

e a

year

Crea

te o

ppor

tuni

ty

for d

evel

opm

ent o

f:

50 lo

w-in

com

e re

ntal

un

its th

roug

h CR

A/L

A

188

low

-inco

me

rent

al u

nits

31 lo

w-in

com

e ho

meo

wne

rshi

p un

its

15 m

oder

ate

inco

me

hom

eow

ners

hip

units

15 a

bove

-mod

erat

e ho

meo

wne

rshi

p un

its”

Blos

som

Pla

za: 2

62 u

nits

, Ave

nue

57: 1

00 u

nits

, Pic

o/Ro

bert

son

43 u

nits

, all

thre

e pr

ojec

ts a

re in

pre

deve

lopm

ent.

One

pro

ject

in c

onst

ruct

ion

Phas

e IIB

Gra

nd A

ve

260

units

and

on

com

plet

ed p

roje

ct 6

6 un

its.

“A li

st o

f City

ow

ned

land

for a

uctio

n is

post

ed

annu

ally.

How

ever

the

list i

s no

t tai

lore

d fo

r affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g re

deve

lopm

ent.

HCID

LA’s

Hous

ing

Deve

lopm

ent C

entr

al (H

DC)

was

not

effe

ctiv

e an

d w

as c

ance

lled

in 2

010.

Rem

ove

give

n di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

and

the

canc

ella

tion

of th

e HD

C. T

he

rede

velo

pmen

t of C

ity-o

wne

d pr

oper

ty,

incl

udin

g fo

rmer

CRA

land

ass

ets,

will

be

inco

rpor

ated

into

new

pro

gram

New

Pr

oduc

tion

of A

fford

able

Hou

sing.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-21

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Page 22: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-22 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

4C. I

ndus

tria

l La

nd: R

edev

elop

men

t O

ppor

tuni

ties

“Com

plet

e In

dust

rial

Land

Use

Stu

dy a

nd 1

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

n U

pdat

es

Adop

t reg

ulat

ions

re

quiri

ng a

fford

able

ho

usin

g se

t-asid

e w

ith re

deve

lopm

ent

of in

dust

rial l

and.

Cr

eate

opp

ortu

nity

for

deve

lopm

ent o

f 400

m

arke

t rat

e w

ork

forc

e ho

usin

g un

its a

nd 1

00

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g un

its

durin

g th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d,

incl

udin

g 25

ext

rem

ely

low

-inco

me

units

, 25

very

low

-inco

me

units

,

25 lo

w-in

com

e un

its, a

nd

25 m

oder

ate-

inco

me

units

“The

Indu

stria

l Lan

d U

se S

tudy

was

com

plet

ed in

200

7. It

s re

com

men

datio

ns fo

rm th

e ba

sis o

f sub

sequ

ent p

lann

ing

and

zoni

ng a

ctio

ns in

are

as w

ith in

dust

rial l

and,

incl

udin

g ne

w C

omm

unity

Pla

ns a

nd T

rans

it N

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

s.

Prop

osed

regu

latio

ns to

requ

ire a

fford

able

hou

sing

set-a

side

with

rede

velo

pmen

t of i

ndus

tria

l lan

d in

are

as id

entifi

ed

as “

”tra

nsiti

onal

”” h

ave

not t

aken

pla

ce. T

here

fore

litt

le,

if an

y, a

fford

able

hou

sing

has

been

cre

ated

as

a re

sult

of re

siden

tial p

roje

cts

on fo

rmer

ly in

dust

rial l

and.

The

stud

y ha

s be

en e

ffect

ive

at g

uidi

ng la

nd

use

deci

sions

, but

the

lack

of a

n af

ford

abili

ty

requ

irem

ent h

as le

d to

sub

par r

esul

ts w

ith

rega

rds

to a

fford

able

hou

sing

prod

uctio

n go

als.

Rem

ove,

as

the

Stud

y po

rtio

n ha

s be

en

com

plet

ed a

nd m

erge

the

prop

osed

af

ford

able

hou

sing

requ

irem

ents

as

pect

into

a n

ew p

rogr

am ti

tled

Land

Use

Ince

ntiv

es to

Incr

ease

th

e Pr

oduc

tion

of H

ousin

g.

1.1.

4D. R

edev

elop

men

t of

Bro

wnfi

eld

Indu

stria

l an

d Co

mm

erci

al S

ites

“Env

ironm

enta

l cl

ean-

up o

f at l

east

fiv

e br

ownfi

eld

site

s

Crea

te o

ppor

tuni

ty fo

r 10

0 un

its, i

nclu

ding

10 v

ery

low

and

10 lo

w in

com

e un

its”

As

best

as

can

be d

eter

min

ed, r

edev

elop

men

t of b

row

nfiel

d si

tes

has

resu

lted

in o

ne a

fford

able

hou

sing

proj

ect -

the

Phili

pino

W

orke

rs C

ente

r Fam

ily H

ousin

g pr

ojec

t, w

hich

will

pro

vide

45

tota

l uni

ts o

f affo

rdab

le fa

mily

hou

sing,

incl

udin

g 9

units

set

asid

e fo

r tra

nsiti

on-a

ge y

outh

and

22

units

for h

omel

ess

indi

vidu

als.

A

ll un

its a

re a

fford

able

and

rang

e fro

m 3

0% to

50%

AM

I.

Whi

le re

deve

lopm

ent o

f bro

wnfi

eld

indu

stria

l an

d co

mm

erci

al s

ites

cont

inue

s to

mov

e fo

rwar

d,

few

hou

sing

deve

lopm

ents

hav

e re

sulte

d fro

m

the

wor

k. M

ost r

edev

elop

men

t pro

ject

s re

sult

in p

ark

site

s or

com

mer

cial

rede

velo

pmen

t.

Cont

inue

, with

rene

wed

focu

s on

hou

sing

deve

lopm

ent a

s an

end

pro

duct

.

1.1.

4E. P

ublic

Fac

ilitie

s Zo

ned

Land

: Joi

nt

Use

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

“Cre

ate

oppo

rtun

ities

for

50 v

ery

low

and

50 lo

w in

com

e un

its

durin

g th

e pl

anni

ng

perio

d”

“The

Los

Ang

eles

Uni

fied

Scho

ol D

istr

ict (

LAU

SD)

part

nere

d w

ith a

non

profi

t dev

elop

er to

fina

lize

cons

truc

tion

on 5

0 un

its o

f affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g (2

-

3 BR

s/30

-60%

AM

I) on

sch

ool-d

istr

ict o

wne

d su

rplu

s la

nd in

the

Gla

ssel

Par

k co

mm

unity

. A s

econ

d 29

uni

t pro

ject

by

the

sam

e pa

rtne

rs is

cur

rent

ly g

oing

thro

ugh

the

entit

lem

ent p

roce

ss.”

The

prog

ram

has

met

hal

f of i

ts o

bjec

tive

to

build

100

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g un

its o

n Pu

blic

Fa

cilit

ies

(LAU

SD) z

oned

pro

pert

y. A

noth

er

proj

ect (

prop

osed

for 2

9 lo

w-in

com

e un

its)

rem

ains

in p

re-d

evel

opm

ent,

whi

ch w

ould

re

sult

in th

e go

als

bein

g la

rgel

y m

et.

Cont

inue

, as

the

pote

ntia

l for

re

deve

lopm

ent o

f the

se s

ites

rem

ains

val

id.

1.1.

4F. I

nfill

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

Ass

ist p

lann

ers

and

deve

lope

rs to

iden

tify

10 n

ew lo

catio

ns

for r

esid

entia

l de

velo

pmen

t ann

ually

No

tang

ible

pro

gres

s ha

s be

en m

ade

on th

is pr

ogra

m

mee

ting

its o

bjec

tives

due

to b

udge

t iss

ues.

Whi

le w

ork

bega

n on

iden

tifyi

ng s

oftw

are

need

s an

d co

sts

to c

ompl

ete

the

prog

ram

obj

ectiv

es,

adeq

uate

reso

urce

s w

ere

not a

ble

to b

e lo

cate

d.

Rem

ove,

as

reso

urce

s do

not

app

ear

to b

e av

aila

ble.

Als

o, th

e pr

ogra

m is

sli

ghtly

dup

licat

ive

of th

e ad

equa

te s

ite

sele

ctio

n fo

r res

iden

tial d

evel

opm

ent

cont

aine

d in

the

Hous

ing

Elem

ent.

Page 23: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-23

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

4G. I

nfill

Opp

ortu

nitie

s:

Dow

ntow

n Ce

nter

“Cre

ate

loca

tions

for 7

00

hous

ing

units

, inc

ludi

ng

40 m

oder

ate,

30 lo

w, a

nd

30 v

ery

low

inco

me

units

The

Gre

ater

Dow

ntow

n Ho

usin

g In

cent

ive

Prog

ram

was

la

unch

ed in

200

7. It

offe

rs in

crea

sed

heig

ht a

nd F

AR

right

s in

ex

chan

ge fo

r the

pro

visio

n of

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g. A

t lea

st 4

pr

ojec

ts w

ith 3

38 u

nits

(308

affo

rdab

le) h

ave

been

dev

elop

ed

since

the

prog

ram

beg

an in

200

7. O

ne o

f the

pro

ject

s w

as

mar

ket-

base

d, w

hile

the

othe

r 3 w

ere

assis

ted

proj

ects

.

“Gre

ater

Dow

ntow

n Ho

usin

g In

cent

ive

Prog

ram

w

as la

unch

ed a

s th

e ho

usin

g cr

isis

bega

n in

20

07, t

here

fore

tota

l pro

gres

s ha

s be

en m

uted

.

This

port

ion

of th

e pr

ogra

m is

repe

titiv

e w

ith

anot

her s

tand

alon

e pr

ogra

m (D

ownt

own

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Bo

nus)

. The

Dow

ntow

n TF

AR

aspe

ct h

as re

mai

ned

rele

vant

; how

ever

it

is al

so d

uplic

ativ

e of

ano

ther

sta

ndal

one

prog

ram

(Dow

ntow

n TF

AR

Publ

ic B

enefi

t Fee

).”

Rem

ove,

as

both

maj

or p

arts

of t

he

prog

ram

app

ear e

lsew

here

as

stan

dalo

ne

prog

ram

s. N

o ne

ed fo

r dup

licat

ion.

1.1.

4H. C

oord

inat

ion

of In

frast

ruct

ure

Impr

ovem

ents

Faci

litie

s fin

anci

ng p

lan

in u

p to

8 u

dpat

ed

Com

mun

ity P

lans

Whi

le in

frast

ruct

ure/

faci

litie

s ch

apte

rs a

re b

eing

incl

uded

in

the

New

Com

mun

ity P

lans

, the

obj

ectiv

e of

cre

atin

g Fa

cilit

ies

Fina

ncin

g Pl

ans

has

not b

een

adop

ted,

nor

has

th

e id

ea o

f for

mal

ly a

lloca

ting

reso

urce

s to

com

mun

ities

th

at h

ave

seen

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g pr

oduc

tion.

Prog

ram

obj

ectiv

es h

ave

not b

een

reac

hed

as th

e fe

asib

ility

of d

oing

so

is lo

w.

Rem

ove,

as

it do

es s

eem

like

ly th

at

this

prog

ram

will

be

impl

emen

ted

with

in th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d.

1.1.

5A. P

erm

anen

t and

N

ew F

undi

ng S

ourc

es

for t

he A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g Tr

ust F

und

$100

,000

,000

ann

ually

Redu

ctio

n in

HO

ME

allo

catio

n fro

m a

ppro

xim

atel

y 40

mill

ion

annu

ally

to 2

2 m

illio

n du

ring

the

12/1

3 fis

cal y

ear.

NSP

2 an

d EE

CBG

hav

e be

en s

pent

, with

no

signi

fican

t pro

gram

inco

me

antic

ipat

ed. N

o ne

w F

eder

al s

ourc

es h

ave

been

iden

tified

.

Effe

ctiv

e in

spe

ndin

g fu

nds

but n

o su

cces

s in

fin

ding

new

fund

ing.

Pos

sible

futu

re p

rogr

am

inco

me

from

rest

ruct

urin

g 15

yea

r or o

lder

pr

ojec

ts o

r ado

ptio

n of

fee

on d

evel

opm

ent

that

cre

ates

dem

and

for h

ousin

g.

Com

bine

with

oth

er a

dvoc

acy

prog

ram

s to

cre

ate

new

Adv

ocat

e fo

r Hou

sing

Fund

s pr

ogra

m.

1.1.

5B. A

dvoc

ate

for S

tate

an

d Fe

dera

l Hou

sing

Fund

s

Supp

ort S

tate

and

Fed

eral

bi

lls th

at p

rovi

de fu

nds

for a

fford

able

hou

sing

deve

lopm

ent i

n th

e Ci

ty

of L

os A

ngel

es in

eac

h le

gisla

tive

sess

ion

The

CLA

reco

mm

ende

d th

at C

ity C

ounc

il su

ppor

t at l

east

13

pie

ces

of h

ousin

g-re

late

d le

gisla

tion

at th

e St

ate

and

Fede

ral l

evel

sin

ce 2

006.

The

HCI

DLA

trac

ked

and

prod

uced

a

bill

anal

ysis

in s

uppo

rt o

f sel

ecte

d le

gisla

tion.

This

prog

ram

met

its

obje

ctiv

e.Co

mbi

ne w

ith o

ther

adv

ocac

y pr

ogra

ms

to c

reat

e ne

w A

dvoc

ate

for H

ousin

g Fu

nds

prog

ram

.

1.1.

5C. A

fford

able

Hou

sing

Publ

ic B

enefi

t Fee

“Com

plet

e ne

xus

stud

y to

est

ablis

h a

Publ

ic B

enefi

t Fee

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to th

e Zo

ning

Cod

e to

impl

emen

t a

Publ

ic B

enefi

t Fee

Targ

et $

20 m

illio

n in

fees

col

lect

ed to

su

ppor

t affo

rdab

le

hous

ing

deve

lopm

ent

and/

or in

frast

ruct

ure

impr

ovem

ents

“The

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Pu

blic

Ben

efit F

ee S

tudy

was

co

mpl

eted

in 2

011.

The

stu

dy lo

oked

at t

he n

exus

be

twee

n ne

w m

arke

t-ra

te d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

the

subs

eque

nt in

crea

se in

dem

and

for a

fford

able

hou

sing

in th

e Ci

ty o

f Los

Ang

eles

. The

repo

rt w

as re

leas

ed

publ

icly

in 2

012.

No

actio

n su

bseq

uent

to re

leas

e, b

esid

es

publ

ic p

rese

ntat

ions

and

feed

back

ses

sions

.”

The

nexu

s st

udy

was

com

plet

ed, b

ut n

o su

bseq

uent

City

act

ion

to im

plem

ent t

he id

ea.

The

stud

y w

as re

leas

ed p

ublic

ly in

late

201

2.

Rem

ove

as s

tand

alon

e pr

ogra

m a

s it

does

not

cur

rent

ly s

eem

pro

babl

e th

at

impl

enta

tion

actio

ns w

ill b

e ta

ken.

Page 24: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-24 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.1.

5D. D

ownt

own

TFA

R Pu

blic

Ben

efit F

ee$2

0 m

illio

n fo

r affo

rdab

le

hous

ing

deve

lopm

ent

“The

Dow

ntow

n TF

AR

Publ

ic B

enefi

t Fee

fund

s a

num

ber o

f co

mm

unity

ben

efit p

roje

cts

in th

e do

wnt

own

area

, inc

ludi

ng

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g. M

illio

ns fo

r dol

lars

hav

e be

en d

edic

ated

to

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g do

wnt

own

since

200

6, h

owev

er a

n ex

act n

umbe

r was

not

abl

e to

be

gene

rate

d at

this

time.

Ther

e ha

s be

en n

o pr

ogre

ss o

n de

dica

ting

a po

rtio

n of

the

Bene

fit F

ee d

irect

ly to

the

City

’s Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Trus

t Fun

d,

or in

requ

iring

affo

rdab

ility

to ta

ke p

art i

n th

e pr

ogra

m.”

“Lar

gely

effe

ctiv

e in

pro

vidi

ng a

n im

port

ant s

trea

m o

f affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g re

sour

ces

in th

e do

wnt

own

area

.

With

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A, D

CP

tran

sfer

red

the

juris

dict

ion

of th

e “”

Allo

catio

n of

Flo

or A

rea

Righ

ts””

pro

gram

pre

viou

sly

cont

aine

d in

the

Bunk

er H

ill R

edev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

t Are

a, to

the

DCP

thro

ugh

a ne

w B

unke

r Hi

ll Sp

ecifi

c Pl

an (2

013)

. The

tran

sfer

allo

ws

the

City

to c

ontin

ue a

lloca

ting

a po

ol o

f unb

uilt

floor

ar

ea ri

ghts

in th

e di

stric

t, fa

cilit

ate

cont

inue

d de

sign

revi

ew o

f new

dev

elop

men

t, an

d m

odify

pa

rkin

g re

quire

men

ts. H

owev

er p

aym

ents

to th

e Pu

blic

Ben

efit T

rust

Fun

d ha

ve b

een

ende

d.”

Reta

in, w

ith c

urre

nt p

rogr

am

mod

ifica

tion

idea

s.

1.1.

6A. O

ff-Si

te

Park

ing

Opt

ions

Redu

ce th

e co

st o

f hou

sing

prod

uctio

n by

redu

cing

th

e co

st o

f par

king

in

10 n

eigh

borh

oods

The

City

has

app

rove

d tw

o fu

lly a

utom

ated

par

king

str

uctu

res

– a

15-c

ar fu

lly a

utom

ated

lift

in th

e Va

lley

and

a 17

-car

faci

lity

in

Chin

atow

n. A

maj

or re

siden

tial p

roje

ct in

Cen

tury

City

(283

uni

ts)

prop

oses

the

use

of s

uch

a st

ruct

ure.

In 2

012,

the

City

Cou

ncil

inst

ruct

ed th

e ap

prop

riate

City

age

ncie

s to

pre

pare

and

rele

ase

an

RFP

to p

rovi

de a

n au

tom

ated

par

king

sys

tem

at t

he n

ew C

ity-

owne

d pa

rkin

g lo

ts o

n El

ectr

ic A

venu

e in

the

Veni

ce c

omm

unity

.

Prog

ram

has

bee

n ef

fect

ive

in w

orki

ng

tow

ards

the

obje

ctiv

es o

f util

izin

g th

is te

chno

logy

to a

ssis

t in

hous

ing

prod

uctio

n.

How

ever

, the

larg

er p

rogr

am g

oals

are

dupl

icat

ive

with

ano

ther

exi

stin

g pa

rkin

g pr

ogra

m (I

nnov

ativ

e Pa

rkin

g St

rate

gies

).

Mer

ge p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

with

In

nova

tive

Park

ing

Stra

tegi

es p

rogr

am.

1.1.

6B. C

oope

rativ

e La

bor A

gree

men

ts a

nd

Coop

erat

ive

Mat

eria

ls Pu

rcha

sing

Agre

emen

ts

Dem

onst

ratio

n co

oper

ativ

e ag

reem

ent f

or la

bor a

nd/

or m

ater

ials

amon

g se

vera

l re

siden

tial d

evel

oper

s

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.1.

6C. L

and

Ow

ners

hip

Alte

rnat

ives

Dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ojec

t w

ith o

ne o

r mor

e de

velo

pers

em

ploy

ing

alte

rnat

ive

land

ow

ners

hip

stru

ctur

es

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.1.

7A. C

ase

Man

agem

ent

and

Case

Pro

cess

ing

Ass

ista

nce

Ass

ist 5

0 pr

ojec

ts p

er y

ear

The

City

rece

ntly

cre

ated

two

stre

amlin

ed c

ase

man

agem

ent

proc

esse

s fo

r obt

aini

ng b

uild

ing

perm

its -

the

Para

llel D

esig

n Pe

rmitt

ing

Prog

ram

(PDP

P) a

nd D

evel

opm

ent S

ervi

ces

Case

M

anag

emen

t (DS

CM).

DBS

allo

ws

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g pr

ojec

ts to

pa

rtic

ipat

e at

low

er u

nit t

hres

hold

s th

an p

roje

cts

with

out a

fford

able

ho

usin

g. B

oth

proc

esse

s pr

ovid

e ca

se m

anag

emen

t ass

ista

nce

that

gr

eatly

ass

ist i

n st

ream

linin

g th

e pe

rmitt

ing

proc

ess.

In 2

012,

the

City

als

o cr

eate

d in

inte

r-de

part

men

tal c

oord

inat

ed re

view

pla

n - t

he

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Pr

ojec

t Rev

iew

Pro

cedu

res

Mem

o +

Flo

wch

art.

Goo

d pr

ogre

ss h

as b

een

mad

e in

exp

editi

ng

and

stre

amlin

ing

proj

ects

thro

ugh

bett

er

case

man

agem

ent a

nd in

ter-

depa

rtm

enta

l co

llabo

ratio

n. T

he p

rogr

am, h

owev

er,

over

laps

with

ano

ther

pro

gram

(Exp

edite

Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Proj

ects

).

Com

bine

cas

e m

anag

emen

t and

cas

e pr

oces

sing

assis

tanc

e w

ith s

imila

r pro

gram

(E

xped

ite A

fford

able

Hou

sing

Proj

ects

).

1.1.

7B. E

mpl

oyer

-A

ssis

ted

Hous

ing

Crea

te 5

0 m

oder

ate

and

50 a

bove

mod

erat

e ho

usin

g un

its a

s de

mon

stra

tion

proj

ect

with

one

em

ploy

er

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

Page 25: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-25

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

1A. S

yste

mat

ic

Code

Enf

orce

men

t Pr

ogra

m (S

CEP)

Insp

ect 1

,629

,553

uni

ts

Purs

uant

to C

hapt

er X

VI o

f the

Los

Ang

eles

Mun

icip

al C

ode,

the

HCID

LA a

dmin

iste

rs th

e SC

EP p

rogr

am. T

he p

rogr

am p

rovi

des

for

the

rout

ine

habi

tabi

liy in

spec

tion

of th

e Ci

ty’s

720,

000

mul

ti-fa

mily

resid

entia

l ren

t uni

ts to

ens

ure

conf

orm

ance

with

the

Calif

orni

a He

alth

and

Saf

ety

Code

and

loca

l ord

inan

ces.

Fro

m 2

006

thro

ugh

2012

, the

SCE

P pr

ogra

m in

spec

ted

1,33

3,97

0 m

ulti-

fam

ily re

siden

tial r

enta

l uni

ts, a

nd c

ited

2,17

3,12

8 ha

bita

bilit

y vi

olat

ions

. The

SCE

P pr

ogra

m c

olle

cts

appr

oxim

atel

y $3

5 m

illio

n in

ann

ual r

even

ue fo

r HCI

DLA’

s Co

de E

nfor

cem

ent T

rust

Fun

d.

Sinc

e th

e pr

ogra

m’s

ince

ptio

n, re

aliz

ed a

98%

redu

ctio

n in

the

num

ber o

f sub

stan

dard

pro

pert

ies

with

in th

e Ci

ty o

f Los

Ang

eles

fro

m 1

50,0

00 to

3,5

00. T

he p

rogr

am m

aint

ains

a 9

9% c

ompl

ianc

e ra

te w

ith D

epar

tmen

t-is

sued

ord

ers

to re

pair

viol

atio

ns.

The

SCEP

pro

gram

has

mat

ured

and

evo

lved

in

to o

ne o

f the

mos

t suc

cess

ful,

proa

ctiv

e ha

bita

bilit

y in

spec

tion

prog

ram

s in

the

natio

n an

d is

reco

gniz

ed a

s a

lead

er in

the

code

en

forc

emen

t ind

ustr

y. T

he p

rogr

am c

onsis

tent

ly

mee

ts o

r exc

eeds

its

goal

s, fu

lfills

the

inte

nt a

nd

purp

ose

of th

e Ho

usin

g Co

de, a

nd c

ontr

ibut

es

to th

e pr

eser

vatio

n of

the

City

’s re

ntal

hou

sing

for t

he C

ity’s

rent

al h

ousin

g po

pula

tion.

Reta

in

1.2.

2A. S

ingl

e Fa

mily

Re

habi

litat

ion

“3,0

52 e

xtre

mel

y lo

w in

com

e un

its

2,05

0 ve

ry lo

w

inco

me

units

1,17

8 lo

w in

com

e un

its”

“Min

or h

ome

repa

irs o

r ins

talla

tion

of s

afet

y &

secu

rity

devi

ces:

Extr

emel

y lo

w-in

com

e - 7

,857

Very

low

-inco

me

- 4,0

88

Low

-inco

me

- 1,9

10”

This

prog

ram

has

exc

eede

d its

obj

ectiv

es.

Reta

in

1.2.

2B. R

esid

entia

l Re

habi

litat

ion

“189

ver

y lo

w in

com

e un

its

290

low

inco

me

units

Resid

entia

l Reh

abili

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m c

ompl

eted

78

proj

ects

to

ass

ista

nce

low

inco

me

hom

eow

ners

sin

ce 2

006.

Pro

gram

di

scon

tinue

d in

200

8 du

e to

fund

ing

redu

ctio

ns.

This

prog

ram

did

not

mee

t its

obj

ectiv

e du

e to

fund

ing

redu

ctio

ns in

200

8.Re

mov

e. P

rogr

am n

o lo

nger

ava

ilabl

e.

1.2.

2C. U

tility

M

aint

enan

ce P

rogr

am

Prev

ent t

he v

acat

ion

of

2,05

0 m

aste

r-met

ered

ap

artm

ent b

uild

ings

DWP

refe

rred

ove

r 196

cas

es re

ferr

ed to

HCI

DLA

, of w

hich

16

ram

ains

ope

n. B

etw

een

the

UM

P an

d RE

AP

over

777

util

ity s

hot

off w

ere

prev

ente

d, w

hich

dur

ing

the

fore

clos

ure

crisi

s pl

ayed

an

impo

rtan

t rol

e in

mai

ntai

ning

util

ities

in fo

recl

osed

pro

pert

ies.

Fr

om Ja

nuar

y 1,

200

6 th

roug

h De

cem

ber 3

1, 2

012,

HCI

DLA

issu

ed

890

paym

ents

tota

ling

$2.3

mill

ion

to th

e De

part

men

t of W

ater

an

d Po

wer

to p

reve

nt u

tility

shu

t-of

f in

prop

ertie

s th

roug

hout

the

City

, and

ther

efor

e pr

even

t disp

lace

men

t of t

enan

ts. I

n ad

ditio

n to

pay

men

ts to

DW

P, th

roug

h U

MP,

199

pay

men

ts to

talin

g $1

67,8

00 w

ere

also

issu

ed to

The

Gas

Com

pany

to a

void

util

ity

shut

off.

The

ave

rage

pay

men

t am

ount

was

$2,

100.

Dur

ing

the

fore

clos

ure

crisi

s, th

is as

sista

nce

has

play

ed a

n im

port

ant

role

in m

aint

aini

ng u

tiliti

es in

fore

clos

ed p

rope

rtie

s as

wel

l.

Effe

ctiv

e. U

MP

has

succ

essf

ully

pre

vent

ed u

tility

se

rvic

e te

rmin

atio

n in

par

ticip

atin

g bu

ildin

gs.

Reta

in th

is pr

ogra

m to

pro

vide

pay

men

t fo

r ess

entia

l ser

vice

s on

beh

alf o

f the

Ci

ty’s

mos

t vul

nera

ble

resid

ents

.

Page 26: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-26 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

2D. R

esid

entia

l Re

habi

litat

ion

of O

bsol

ete

Publ

ic H

ousin

g

“Com

plet

e re

vita

lizat

ion

of H

arbo

r Vie

w a

nd

Jord

an d

owns

77 a

bove

mod

erat

e-in

com

e,

200

mod

erat

e-in

com

e,

25 lo

w-in

com

e, a

nd

103

very

low

-inco

me

units

in th

e Ha

rbor

Vie

w

Deve

lopm

ent

280

extr

emel

y lo

w in

com

e,

280

very

low

inco

me,

and

140

low

inco

me

1-fo

r-1

repl

acem

ent P

ublic

Ho

usin

g un

its,

700

wor

kfor

ce h

ousin

g un

its a

nd m

arke

t rat

e ho

meo

wne

rshi

p,

700

mar

ket r

ate

rent

al u

nits

in th

e Jo

rdan

Dow

ns

Deve

lopm

ent”

“HAC

LA’s

Dana

Str

and

rede

velo

pmen

t has

com

plet

ed P

hase

s 1-

3,

resu

lting

in 3

36 u

nits

con

stru

cted

. Sel

ectio

n of

dev

elop

er fo

r Pha

se

IV is

und

erw

ay. A

com

preh

ensi

ve m

oder

niza

tion

of 4

48 u

nits

at

San

Fern

ando

Gar

dens

took

pla

ce in

200

9. H

ACLA

has

focu

sed

its

rece

nt C

apita

l Gra

nt fu

ndin

g to

war

ds th

e re

plac

emen

t of b

uild

ing

syst

ems

(suc

h as

wat

er li

nes,

gas

line

s an

d ro

ofs)

for i

ts la

rge

publ

ic h

ousin

g si

tes

thro

ugho

ut th

e Ci

ty. S

ince

201

0 th

e Ho

usin

g Au

thor

ity h

as re

habi

litat

ed 3

2 fir

e da

mag

ed u

nits

thro

ugho

ut th

e pu

blic

hou

sing

port

folio

. In

addi

tion,

the

Auth

ority

has

aba

ted

78

asbe

stos

con

tain

ing

units

. Goi

ng fo

rwar

d, th

e Ho

usin

g Au

thor

ity

will

als

o us

e its

Cap

ital F

unds

to c

onve

rt a

por

tion

of th

e pu

blic

ho

usin

g un

its to

mee

t ADA

requ

irem

ents

for i

ts d

isab

led

resid

ents

.

The

next

pla

nned

rede

velo

pmen

t is

Jord

an D

owns

. HAC

LA

has

acqu

ired

a 21

-acr

e ad

jace

nt p

rope

rty

allo

win

g fo

r re

deve

lopm

ent e

ffort

s to

take

effe

ct w

ith m

inim

al d

ispla

cem

ent

of c

urre

nt re

siden

ts. C

ompl

eted

Jord

an D

owns

Com

mun

ity-

Base

d M

aste

r Pla

n, s

ecur

ed C

ity P

lann

ing

Com

mis

sion

appr

oval

and

hire

d M

aste

r Dev

elop

er P

artn

er.”

Obj

ectiv

es o

n tr

ack

to re

aliz

atio

n. T

he H

ousin

g Au

thor

ity c

ontin

ues

to re

orga

nize

its

depa

rtm

ents

an

d w

ork

to m

ore

effe

ctiv

ely

and

effic

ient

ly u

se

Capi

tal F

unds

to im

prov

e th

e qu

ality

of h

ousin

g un

its a

nd th

e ap

pear

ance

of t

he d

evel

opm

ents

.

Reta

in

1.2.

2E. R

esid

entia

l Ho

tel a

nd S

ingl

e Ro

om

Occ

upan

cy (S

RO)

Hote

l Pre

serv

atio

n

Acqu

isitio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of S

RO h

otel

sCR

A/L

A fu

ndin

g al

low

ed n

onpr

ofit o

rgan

izat

ions

to a

cqui

re

and

reha

bilit

ate

36 S

RO h

otel

s w

ith 2

,003

affo

rdab

le u

nits

.

Prog

ram

was

larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e; h

owev

er th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

has

rem

oved

the

mai

n fu

ndin

g so

urce

for r

ehab

ilita

ting

and

pres

ervi

ng

SRO

s as

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g. Y

et, l

aws

rem

ain

in

plac

e th

at p

rote

ct s

resid

entia

l hot

els

and

SRO

s.

Mer

ge in

to D

ue P

roce

ss H

earin

gs p

rogr

am.

1.2.

2F. R

egul

atio

n of

Co

nver

sion

and

Dem

oliti

on

of R

esid

entia

l Hot

els

Pres

erve

15,

000

resid

entia

l un

its in

315

hot

els

or

conv

ert t

o af

ford

able

uni

ts

A pr

ogre

ss re

view

refle

cts

the

curr

ent d

eter

min

atio

n of

Res

idne

tial

hote

ls an

d un

its e

xcee

ded

the

orig

inal

forc

astin

g of

one

-thi

rd o

f the

or

igin

al li

st (3

15 h

otel

s). T

he w

ork

of id

entif

ying

resid

entia

l hot

els

and

resid

entia

l uni

ts w

ill b

e co

ntin

uing

in a

n on

goin

g m

anne

r. Du

ring

2012

, the

Cod

e En

forc

emen

t Div

ision

took

pro

activ

e m

easu

res

to

iden

tify

resid

entia

l hot

els

in th

e Ci

ty th

roug

h qu

erie

s of

Dep

artm

ent

and

Coun

ty p

rope

rty

data

. Ins

pect

ors

perf

orm

ed fi

eld

surv

eys

of

205

prop

ertie

s an

d id

entifi

ed 6

1 pr

oper

ties

for p

oten

tial i

nclu

sion

in th

e pr

ogra

m, p

endi

ng fu

rthe

r ana

lysis

. Dur

ing

2013

, the

Cod

e En

forc

emen

t Div

ison

will

con

tinue

to s

urve

y ad

ditio

nal p

rope

rtie

s an

d an

ticip

ates

gro

wth

in th

e re

siden

tial h

otel

inve

ntor

y.

The

Ord

inan

ce, p

roce

dure

s an

d de

term

inat

ion

proc

ess

is ef

fect

ive

in a

chiv

ing

the

Prog

ram

goa

ls.

Mer

ge in

to D

ue P

roce

ss H

earin

gs p

rogr

am.

Page 27: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-27

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

2G. S

ectio

n 8

Mod

erat

e Re

habi

litat

ion

Sing

le R

oom

Occ

upan

cy

Mai

ntai

n Se

ctio

n 8

rent

al a

ssis

tanc

e fo

r exi

stin

g 1,

300

part

icip

atin

g SR

O u

nits

HAC

LA h

as a

tota

l of 1

,107

allo

cate

d un

its.

“Pro

gram

was

larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e. T

he o

bjec

tive

of 1

,300

uni

ts in

clud

ed 1

93 M

RP u

nits

.

The

diss

olut

ion

of C

RA/L

A ha

s re

mov

ed th

e m

ain

fund

ing

sour

ce fo

r reh

abili

tatin

g an

d pr

eser

ving

SR

Os

as a

fford

able

hou

sing.

Yet

, law

s re

mai

n in

pla

ce th

at p

rote

cts

resid

entia

l hot

els

and

SRO

s. M

erge

with

sim

ilar p

rogr

am (R

egul

atio

n of

Co

nver

sion

and

Dem

oliti

on o

f Res

iden

tial H

otel

s).

Inco

rpor

ate

insp

ectio

n an

d co

de c

ompl

ianc

e ef

fort

s ta

rget

ed fo

r res

iden

tial h

otel

s an

d SR

Os.

 “

Rem

ove,

as

deve

lope

rs a

re n

o lo

nger

pro

duci

ng S

RO u

nits

.

1.2.

2H. M

obile

Hom

e Pa

rk P

rese

rvat

ion

“Ass

ist 1

00 m

obile

pa

rk te

nant

s

250

mar

ket-

rate

m

obile

hom

e pa

rk

pads

in re

siden

tial

area

s pr

eser

ved”

In Ja

nuar

y 20

12, H

CIDL

A re

leas

ed a

repo

rt th

at re

view

ed th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

Rent

Sta

biliz

atio

n O

rdin

ance

(RSO

) in

mob

ile

hom

e pa

rks,

with

a fo

cus

on th

e un

ique

fina

ncia

l cha

ract

eris

tics

of m

obile

hom

es o

wne

rs a

nd p

ark

owne

rs. T

he re

port

con

tain

ed

spec

ific

reco

mm

enda

tions

rega

rdin

g ch

ange

s to

the

RSO

. Ci

ty C

ounc

il de

cide

d to

con

tinue

the

item

to a

dat

e TB

D.

The

prog

ram

has

not

met

its

obje

ctiv

e, w

hich

w

as c

hang

ed to

the

way

relo

catio

n as

sista

nce

is pr

oces

sed

unde

r the

RSO

for m

obile

hom

es.

Cont

inue

1.2.

2I. P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

gPr

eser

ve a

fford

abili

ty in

up

to 1

5,85

0 ex

pirin

g un

its

HCID

LA m

onito

rs a

nd tr

acks

the

date

s w

hen

15,8

50 a

t-ris

k af

ford

able

hou

sing

units

will

con

vert

to m

arke

t rat

e un

its d

ue to

th

e te

rmin

atio

n of

rent

al s

ubsid

ies

and/

or a

fford

abili

ty re

stric

tions

. A

lso

ensu

res

enfo

rcem

ent o

f not

ice

requ

irem

ents

and

ass

ists

ow

ners

, man

ager

s an

d de

velo

pers

to id

entif

y re

sour

ces

and

optio

ns

to e

xten

d an

d/or

pre

serv

e ex

istin

g at

-risk

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g.

Sam

e ef

fort

s as

oth

er p

rogr

ams

to p

rese

rve

at-r

isk h

ousin

g

Mod

ify th

e pr

ogra

m n

ame

to b

ette

r fit

the

prog

ram

des

crip

tion.

Mod

ify

obje

ctiv

es a

s th

e am

ount

of u

nits

is

unac

hiev

able

with

ava

ilabl

e re

sour

ces.

1.2.

2J. P

rese

rvat

ion

of th

e Re

ntal

Hou

sing

Stoc

k -

Cond

omin

ium

Con

vers

ions

Prop

ose

Zoni

ng

Code

am

endm

ent

The

City

enf

orce

d Se

ctio

n 12

.95.

2 of

the

Los

Ang

eles

Mun

icip

al

Code

in th

e ev

alua

tion

of a

pplic

atio

ns fo

r con

vers

ions

of m

ulti-

fam

ily re

ntal

hou

sing

to c

ondo

min

ium

s. T

he C

ode

was

not

ch

ange

d to

tigh

ten

cond

o co

nver

sion

findi

ngs,

how

ever

.

Part

ially

effe

ctiv

e. E

nfor

cem

ent o

f the

five

re

quire

d co

ndo

conv

ersio

n fin

ding

s le

d to

in

crea

sed

deni

als

of c

ondo

con

vers

ions

th

at d

o no

t mee

t the

law

. How

ever

no

effo

rts

wer

e m

ade

to s

tren

gthe

n th

e co

ndo

conv

ersio

n la

w. T

he e

xact

type

of p

ropo

sed

Code

cha

nges

was

not

spe

cifie

d.

Cont

inue

with

mor

e sp

ecifi

city

on

prop

osed

cha

nges

to th

e re

quire

d co

ndo

conv

ersio

n fin

ding

s. F

ocus

at

tent

ion

on li

ght-

rail

tran

sit s

tatio

ns.

1.2.

2K. C

ondo

min

ium

Co

nver

sions

“Com

plet

e St

udy

Draf

t ord

inan

ce”

RSO

& P

rimar

y Re

nova

tion

& Te

nant

Hab

itabi

lity

Prog

ram

s re

mai

n in

effe

ct &

tool

s in

pre

serv

ing

638,

000

RSO

uni

ts &

en

cour

agin

g re

inve

stm

ent i

n re

ntal

hou

sing

stoc

k. H

CIDL

A co

ntin

ues

to p

rovi

de tr

aini

ng &

info

to th

e pu

blic

on

prov

ision

s of

thes

e pr

ogra

ms.

App

roxi

mat

ely

1,85

0 re

nt a

djus

tmen

t ap

plic

atio

ns w

ere

proc

esse

d &

appr

oxim

atel

y ov

er $

90

mill

ion

in p

rope

rty

impr

ovem

ents

wer

e ap

prov

ed.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.M

erge

with

sim

ilar p

rogr

am a

bove

(P

rese

rvat

ion

of th

e Re

ntal

Hou

sing

Stoc

k - C

ondo

min

ium

Con

vers

ions

).

1.2.

2L. D

emol

ition

s - P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Com

mun

ity C

hara

cter

“Com

pelte

Stu

dy

Draf

t ord

inan

ce”

Stud

y on

str

ateg

ies

to li

mit

the

dem

oliti

on o

f via

ble,

sta

ble

affo

rdab

le re

ntal

hou

sing

was

not

und

erta

ken.

Not

effe

ctiv

e. S

imila

r to

anot

her p

rogr

am

(Pre

serv

atio

n of

the

Rent

al H

ousin

g St

ock

- Con

dom

iniu

m C

onve

rsio

ns).

Mer

ge p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

with

ex

istin

g pr

ogra

m (P

rese

rvat

ion

of th

e Re

ntal

Hou

sing

Stoc

k -

Cond

omin

ium

Con

vers

ions

).

1.2.

2M. P

rese

rvat

ion

of R

ent-S

tabi

lized

Ho

usin

g U

nits

Pres

erve

633

,000

RS

O u

nits

RSO

& P

rimar

y Re

nova

tion

& Te

nant

Hab

ilita

bilit

y Pr

ogra

ms

are

rem

ain

in e

ffect

& to

ols

in p

rese

rvin

g 63

8,00

0 RS

O

units

& e

ncou

ragi

ng re

inve

stm

ent i

n re

ntal

hou

sing

stoc

k.

HCID

LA c

ontin

ues

to p

rovi

de tr

aini

ng &

info

to th

e pu

blic

on

pro

visio

ns o

f the

se p

rogr

ams.

App

roxi

mat

ely

1,85

0 re

nt

adju

stm

ent a

pplic

atio

ns w

ere

proc

esse

d &

appr

oxim

atel

y ov

er

$90

mill

ion

in p

rope

rty

impr

ovem

ents

wer

e ap

prov

ed.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

Page 28: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-28 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

2N. R

SO E

nfor

cem

ent

Refe

r 60

case

s to

the

city

Att

orne

y an

nual

ly

“HCI

DLA

activ

ity:

RSO

Inve

stig

atio

ns &

Enf

orce

men

t (I&

E) p

rogr

ams

have

bee

n st

reng

then

ed th

roug

h co

ntin

ued

fillin

g of

sev

eral

sup

ervi

sory

po

sitio

ns &

sta

ff tr

aini

ng. A

ppro

xim

atel

y 30

,000

cas

es w

ere

inve

stig

ated

& a

ppro

xim

atel

y 32

5 ca

ses

sent

to th

e Ci

ty A

ttor

ney.

Th

e re

mai

nder

wer

e re

solv

ed in

-hou

se. O

utre

ach

on te

nant

&

land

lord

righ

ts &

resp

onsib

ilitie

s ha

s be

en e

xpan

ded.

OCA

act

ivity

:

App

roxi

mat

ely

350

case

s w

ere

refe

rred

to th

e Ci

ty A

ttor

ney.

In

add

ition

, the

re w

ere

appr

oxim

atel

y 28

5 Ci

ty A

ttor

ney

Offi

ce h

earin

gs (C

AOH)

con

duct

ed. D

urin

g th

e sa

me

perio

d, th

e Ci

ty A

ttor

ney

clos

ed a

ppro

xim

atel

y 45

0 ca

ses

due

to v

olun

tary

com

plia

nce

pre

and

post

-CAO

H.”

Prog

ram

of i

nves

tigat

ing

and

reso

lvin

g ca

ses

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.

Obj

ectiv

e sh

ould

be

to re

solv

e ca

ses

befo

re th

ey n

eed

to g

o to

City

Att

orne

y of

fice

as th

at w

ill re

flect

gre

ater

co

mpl

ianc

e ac

hiev

ed b

y th

e I &

E s

taff.

1.2.

2O. P

rese

rvat

ion

thro

ugh

Tran

sfer

of

Ow

ners

hip

Reha

bilit

ate

20

subs

tand

ard

hous

ing

units

per

yea

r

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.2.

2P. M

ortg

age

Reve

nue

Bond

Fin

anci

ng

for R

ehab

ilita

tion

of

At-R

isk R

enta

l Hou

sing

Reha

bilit

ate

524

low

-in

com

e un

its a

nnua

llyCo

mbi

ne w

ith n

ew P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g pr

ogra

m.

1.2.

2Q. A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g Tr

ust F

und

(AHT

F) –

At-

Risk

Ren

tal

Hous

ing

Reha

bilit

atio

n

Reha

bilta

te 1

13 lo

w-

inco

me

units

ann

ually

Sinc

e 20

06 th

e A

HTF

has

fund

ed 1

1 At

-Risk

pro

ject

s cr

eatin

g a

tota

l of 7

82 lo

w in

com

e un

its.

Effe

ctiv

e. H

CIDL

A w

ill c

ontin

ue to

sup

port

At

-Risk

pro

ject

s as

they

app

ly to

the

Stat

e.Co

mbi

ne w

ith n

ew P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g pr

ogra

m.

1.2.

2R. P

ublic

Hou

sing

Ann

ual I

nspe

ctio

ns

“All

publ

ic h

ousin

g un

its

inps

ecte

d an

nual

ly

All

Sect

ion

8 un

its

insp

ecte

d an

nual

ly”

HAC

LA c

ontin

ued

to c

ondu

ct a

nnua

l ins

pect

ions

of a

ll un

its

unde

r the

Pub

lic H

ousin

g an

d Se

ctio

n 8

prog

ram

s.M

et p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

1.2.

2S. L

ead-

Safe

Ho

usin

g: P

rivat

ely-

owne

d Ho

usin

g U

nits

“Com

plet

e le

ad a

bate

men

t in

90

extr

emel

y lo

w

inco

me

units

Com

plet

e le

ad

abat

emen

t in

135

very

lo

w in

com

e un

its

Com

plet

e le

ad a

bate

men

t in

225

low

inco

me

units

“Com

plet

ed le

ad a

bate

men

t in

a to

tal o

f 927

ex

trem

ely

low

, ver

y lo

w a

nd lo

w in

com

e un

its.

The

City

’s Le

ad H

azar

d Re

med

iatio

n Pr

ogra

m re

ceiv

es

fund

ing

from

HU

D’s

lead

haz

ard

redu

ctio

n

and

heal

thy

hom

es p

rodu

ctio

n pr

ogra

m g

rant

s. T

he

City

sta

ff w

ork

with

sev

eral

com

mun

ity-b

ased

orga

niza

tions

, hea

lthy

hom

es a

dvoc

ates

and

the

Child

hood

Lea

d Po

ison

ing

Prev

entio

n

Prog

ram

(CLP

PP) o

f the

Cou

nty

Depa

rtm

ent o

f Pu

blic

Hea

lth to

impl

emen

t the

pro

gram

s. In

addi

tion,

City

’s Sy

stem

atic

Cod

e En

forc

emen

t Pro

gram

ci

tes

unsa

fe le

ad w

ork

prac

tices

whe

n

apar

tmen

t ow

ners

or d

wel

lers

con

duct

reha

bilit

atio

n in

ol

der h

ousin

g an

d ex

pose

the

resid

ents

or w

orke

rs to

lead

-ba

sed

pain

t haz

ards

. The

Hea

lthy

Hom

es C

olla

bora

tive,

a

non-

profi

t org

aniz

atio

n, fa

cilit

ates

this

proc

ess.”

This

prog

ram

has

exc

eede

d its

obj

ectiv

es.

“Ret

ain.

Chan

ge n

ame

to “

”Hea

lth H

omes

an

d Le

ad-S

afe

Hous

ing”

””

Page 29: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-29

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

2T. L

ead-

Safe

Hou

sing:

H

ACLA

Hou

sing

Uni

ts

Aba

te le

ad-b

ased

pa

int h

azar

ds in

35

units

ann

ually

HAC

LA a

bate

d or

sta

biliz

ed le

ad-b

ased

pai

nts

in u

nits

as

need

ed.

Effe

ctiv

e.Re

tain

, but

rena

me

to L

ead-

Base

d Pa

int E

valu

atio

n an

d A

bate

men

t.

1.2.

2U. A

t-Ri

sk A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g Te

nant

Out

reac

h an

d Ed

ucat

ion

Invo

lve

up to

8,0

00

resid

ents

of i

dent

ified

at

-risk

uni

ts in

pr

eser

vatio

n ef

fort

s

From

200

9 to

201

2, th

e pr

ogra

m in

volv

ed 8

,997

resid

ents

of

iden

tified

at-

risk

units

that

resu

lted

in re

new

al o

f ren

tal

subs

idie

s, im

prov

emen

ts in

bui

ldin

g’s

phys

ical

con

ditio

ns,

and

prev

entio

n of

ille

gal r

ent i

ncre

ases

and

/or e

vict

ions

“Thi

s pr

ogra

m e

xcee

ded

its

obje

ctiv

e.

Activ

ity w

as fu

nded

by

Mac

Art

hur G

rant

fund

s an

d ne

w fu

ndin

g ne

ed to

be

iden

tified

.”

Reta

in. M

odify

out

reac

h nu

mbe

r obj

ectiv

e

1.2.

2V. P

rese

rve

Affo

rdab

ility

Cov

enan

ts

of A

t-Ri

sk U

nits

“Mon

itor a

ll 15

, 850

uni

ts

with

exp

iring

cov

enan

ts

Exte

nd a

nd p

rese

rve

affo

rdab

ility

of u

p to

2,

000

at-r

isk u

nits

A to

tal o

f 2,3

20 a

t-ris

k un

its p

rese

rved

. 902

uni

ts (1

2 pr

ojec

ts) u

nder

the

AHT

F. 1

,418

uni

ts (9

pro

ject

s) u

nder

th

e Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Bond

Pro

gram

(AHB

P)

“Thi

s pr

ogra

m e

xcee

ded

its

obje

ctiv

e.”

Com

bine

with

Pre

serv

atio

n of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g.

1.2.

2W. M

ortg

age

Reve

nue

Bond

Fin

anci

ng-

-Reh

abili

tatio

n of

Af

ford

able

Ren

tal H

ousin

g

Reha

bilit

ate

540

very

lo

w-in

com

e un

its

Sinc

e 20

06, H

CIDL

A ha

s is

sued

bon

ds fo

r 1,6

73 re

hab

(bon

d on

ly) r

enta

l hou

sing

units

, of w

hich

229

use

d N

SP fu

nds)

(plu

s a

tota

l of 4

24 re

hab

units

com

bine

d w

ith A

HTF

fund

s)Ef

fect

ive

Com

bine

with

Mor

tgag

e Re

venu

e Bo

nd F

inan

cing

.

1.2.

3A. U

rgen

t Re

pair

Prog

ram

Prev

ent t

he v

acat

ion

of 4

,509

mar

ket-

rate

ap

artm

ent b

uild

ings

due

to

life-

safe

ty H

ousin

g Co

de

and

the

Calif

orni

a He

alth

an

d Sa

fety

Cod

e vi

olat

ions

From

200

6 th

roug

h 20

12, 4

,161

cas

es w

ere

refe

rred

to th

e U

rgen

t Re

pair

Prog

ram

for r

epai

r of u

rgen

t life

-saf

ety

habi

tabi

lity

viol

atio

ns.

Of t

he 4

,161

cas

es, H

CIDL

A su

cces

sful

ly o

btai

ned

com

plia

nce

from

91

% o

f pro

pert

y ow

ners

. For

the

rem

aini

ng 4

11 c

ases

, HCI

DLA

, th

roug

h a

pre-

appr

oved

con

trac

tor,

faci

litat

ed th

e tim

ely

repa

ir of

haz

ardo

us c

ondi

tions

. HCI

DLA

take

s ac

tion

to re

cove

r suc

h fu

nds

expe

nded

incl

udin

g bi

lling

for a

dmin

istr

ativ

e co

sts

and

pena

lties

and

pla

cem

ent o

f a li

en a

gain

st th

e pr

oper

ty w

ith th

e Co

unty

Tax

Ass

esso

r. Th

e pr

ogra

m e

xpen

ds ro

ughl

y $3

00,0

00

annu

ally

in C

omm

unity

Dev

elop

men

t Blo

ck G

rant

fund

s.

The

Urg

ent R

epai

r Pro

gram

pro

vide

s a

timel

y an

d co

st-e

ffect

ive

mea

ns o

f pre

serv

ing

tena

ncy

and

prev

entin

g th

e va

catio

n an

d re

loca

tion

of te

nant

s fro

m re

ntal

uni

ts. T

he p

rogr

am h

as a

pro

foun

dly

posi

tive

impa

ct o

n th

e re

siden

ts o

f mul

ti-fa

mily

rent

al h

ousin

g in

the

City

by

prot

ectin

g th

em fr

om u

nsaf

e an

d ha

zard

ous

livin

g co

nditi

ons

and

from

pot

entia

l hom

eles

snes

s .

Reta

in

1.2.

3B. N

uisa

nce

Aba

tem

ent i

n Va

cant

Re

siden

tial B

uild

ings

“Res

pond

to 3

,500

nu

isan

ce c

ompl

aint

s””

and

“”re

solv

e 2,

500

nuis

ance

issu

es.

Page 30: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-30 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

Plea

se n

ote

that

the

num

eric

al in

form

atio

n ha

s be

en c

hang

ed fr

om

orig

inal

Hou

sing

Elem

ent,

due

to a

tech

nica

l err

or.”

“LA

DBS

open

ed 1

6,52

8 cu

stom

er s

ervi

ce re

ques

ts

(CSR

s) in

201

1 an

d su

cces

sful

ly re

solv

ed

16,3

41 c

ases

(mos

tly

singl

e-fa

mily

, but

als

o so

me

com

mer

cial

/in

dust

rial).

102

cas

es

wer

e tu

rned

into

the

Offi

ce o

f the

City

Att

orne

y (O

CA) f

or c

rimin

al fi

lings

. HC

IDLA

ope

ned

an

aver

age

of a

bout

14,

000

com

plai

nts

on m

ulti-

fam

ily

resid

entia

l pro

pert

ies,

su

cces

sful

ly c

losin

g m

ore

than

99%

of t

hem

.

The

Aba

ndon

ed

Build

ing

Task

For

ce

(ABT

F) a

ddre

sses

pr

oble

ms

asso

ciat

ed

with

vac

ant b

uild

ings

w

ith a

coo

rdin

ated

ef

fort

bet

wee

n ci

ty

pros

ecut

ors,

insp

ecto

rs

from

the

Depa

rtm

ent

of B

uild

ing

and

Safe

ty

(LA

DBS)

and

the

Hous

ing

Depa

rtm

ent,

and

the

Plan

ning

Dep

artm

ent.

ABT

F’s

obje

ctiv

e is

to

reha

bilit

ate

nuis

ance

pr

oper

ties

and

plac

e th

em

back

into

pro

duct

ive

hous

ing

stoc

k. In

thos

e in

stan

ces

whe

n pr

oper

ties

cann

ot b

e re

habi

litat

ed,

LADB

S ca

n se

ek to

hav

e th

em d

emol

ished

.”

Effe

ctiv

e at

resp

ondi

ng to

and

reso

lvin

g nu

isan

ce c

ompl

aint

s.

Reta

in, b

ut b

road

en (a

nd re

nam

e) b

eyon

d va

cant

pro

pert

ies

(alth

ough

reta

in a

s a

focu

s)

to in

clud

e al

l nui

sanc

e is

sues

in a

ll re

siden

tial

prop

ertie

s. F

orec

losu

res

hand

led

unde

r th

e ne

w F

orec

losu

re R

egis

try

prog

ram

.

1.2.

3C. C

ityw

ide

Nui

sanc

e A

bate

men

t Pro

gram

1,20

0 ch

roni

c pr

oble

m

prop

ertie

s an

d nu

isan

ce

issu

es re

solv

ed a

nnua

lly

CNA

P ty

pica

lly o

pens

cas

es o

n 6-

700

prop

ertie

s a

year

du

ring

the

perio

d. M

ost w

ere

for m

edic

al m

ariju

ana

issu

es. D

urin

g th

e sa

me

perio

d, T

akin

g O

ut U

rban

Gan

g He

adqu

arte

rs (T

OU

GH)

revi

ewed

hun

dred

s of

cas

es,

filin

g la

wsu

its, h

oldi

ng c

ase

conf

eren

ces

cond

ucte

d an

d pr

omtin

g ev

ictio

ns o

f gan

g m

embe

rs a

nd th

eir f

amili

es.

Effe

ctiv

e pr

ogra

m, b

ut m

any

case

s ar

e no

t, st

rictly

spe

akin

g, h

ousin

g re

late

d.

Prog

ram

may

resu

lt in

evi

ctio

n.

Rem

ove

as th

is pr

ogra

m fo

cuse

s m

ostly

on

non

-hou

sing

rela

ted

issu

es. H

ousin

g re

late

d nu

isan

ce a

bate

men

t cas

es n

ow

cons

olid

ated

und

er N

uisa

nce

Aba

tem

ent

in R

esid

entia

l Bui

ldin

gs p

rogr

am.

1.2.

3D. R

ent E

scro

w

Acco

unt P

rogr

am (R

EAP)

5,82

0 ca

ses

5,54

3 ca

ses

wer

e re

ferr

ed to

REA

P. A

s a

resu

lt of

the

REA

P en

forc

emen

t 5,4

10 c

ases

wer

e cl

osed

brin

ging

ove

r 21

,000

resid

entia

l uni

ts to

hab

itabl

e co

nditi

ons.

REA

P is

an e

ffect

ive

enfo

rcem

ent p

rogr

am.

The

num

ber o

f ref

erra

ls to

REA

P is

low

er a

nd

the

rate

of r

ecid

ivism

is a

lso

low

er. T

here

are

fe

wer

inst

ance

s of

repe

at p

rope

rty

owne

rs

who

se p

rope

rtie

s ar

e pl

aced

into

REA

P.

Reta

in R

EAP

as im

plem

ente

d. R

EAP

has

effe

ctiv

ely

mot

ivat

ed p

rope

rty

owne

rs to

mai

ntai

n th

eir p

rope

rtie

s an

d co

mpl

y w

ith c

itatio

ns. C

urre

ntly,

ap

prox

imat

ely

1% o

f hou

sing

insp

ectio

ns

esca

late

into

REA

P re

ferr

als.

Page 31: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-31

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

3E. H

ousin

g En

forc

emen

t (In

ter-A

genc

y Sl

um H

ousin

g Ta

sk F

orce

)

500

prop

ertie

s su

bjec

ted

to T

ask

Forc

e re

view

and

/or

pro

secu

tion

annu

ally

“Sin

ce 2

006

the

City

Att

orne

y’s

Hous

ing

Enfo

rcem

ent S

ectio

n ty

pica

lly re

ceiv

ed a

roun

d 4-

500

case

s su

bmitt

ed b

y th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ing

Task

For

ce a

genc

ies

durin

g th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d. It

con

duct

ed P

re-

Filin

g as

e M

anag

emen

t Con

fere

nces

(PFC

MC)

with

pro

pert

y ow

ners

.

Durin

g th

e sa

me

perio

d, H

ousin

g En

forc

emen

t file

d ar

ound

2-

300

case

s a

year

, cha

rgin

g be

twee

n 1-

2000

cod

e vi

olat

ions

. Th

is ef

fort

resu

lted

in b

etw

een

1-20

00 re

ntal

uni

ts b

roug

ht in

to

com

plia

nce

ofte

n vi

a po

st-c

onvi

ctio

n co

urt h

earin

gs e

ach

year

.”

Effe

ctiv

e pr

ogra

m th

at is

focu

sed

on h

ousin

g en

forc

emen

t.Re

tain

.

1.2.

3F. N

ew O

wne

rshi

p of

Sub

stan

dard

Hou

sing

“Ado

pt a

rece

iver

ship

pr

ogra

m

Plac

e 25

pro

pert

ies

into

re

ceiv

ersh

ip a

nnua

lly”

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.2.

3G. A

mer

ican

Dr

eam

Pro

gram

Plac

e 25

pro

pert

ies

into

Am

eric

an D

ream

Pr

ogra

m a

nnua

lly

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.2.

4A. E

xped

ited

Resid

entia

l Rec

over

y

In th

e ev

ent o

f a n

atur

al

disa

ster

, iss

ue e

ntitl

emen

t ap

prov

als

with

in 4

w

eeks

of a

pplic

atio

n fo

r rec

onst

ruct

ion

Ther

e ha

ve n

ot b

een

any

disa

ster

s sin

ce 2

006

that

re

quire

d ex

pedi

ted

entit

lem

ent a

ppro

vals

.

Prog

ram

rem

ains

an

impo

rtan

t par

t of t

he

City

’s re

cons

truc

tion

plan

s ev

en th

ough

it

was

not

test

ed d

urin

g th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d.Re

tain

1.2.

4B. E

mer

genc

y A

lloca

tion

of R

esid

entia

l Re

cons

truc

tion

Fund

s

In th

e ev

ent o

f a n

atur

al

disa

ster

, iss

ue lo

ans

and

gran

ts w

ithin

4

wee

ks o

f app

licat

ion

for

reco

nstr

uctio

n fu

nds

“HCI

DLA

was

aw

arde

d $3

.5 M

illio

n by

the

Stat

e of

Ca

lifor

nia,

Dep

artm

ent o

f Hou

sing

and

Com

mun

ity

Deve

lopm

ent (

HCD)

, Dis

aste

r Rec

over

y In

itiat

ive

(DRI

) gra

nt fu

nds

for d

isas

ter v

ictim

s of

the

2008

Say

re

Wild

fire

in S

ylm

ar. T

he p

rogr

am w

ill o

ffer e

ligib

le h

omeb

uyer

s pu

rcha

se a

ssis

tanc

e in

the

form

of a

def

erre

d lo

an fo

r do

wnp

aym

ent,

clos

ing

cost

s an

d ac

quisi

tion

finan

cing

to

purc

hase

a m

obile

, man

ufac

ture

d or

sin

gle-

fam

ily h

ome.

Thes

e pl

ans

are

bein

g pu

t int

o pl

ace

as p

art o

f the

Los

Hou

sing

Depa

rtm

ent’s

Em

erge

ncy

Man

agem

ent P

lann

ing.

Prog

ram

rem

ains

an

impo

rtan

t par

t of t

he

City

’s re

cons

truc

tion

plan

s ev

en th

ough

it

was

not

test

ed d

urin

g th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d.

Does

not

nee

d to

be

a st

anda

lone

pro

gram

.

Com

bine

with

Exp

edite

d Re

siden

tial R

ecov

ery

1.2.

5A. R

esou

rces

fo

r Pre

serv

atio

n of

Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

“Pre

serv

e af

ford

abili

ty in

up

to 1

5,85

0 ex

pirin

g un

its

Expa

nd re

sour

ces

for

prog

ram

adm

inis

trat

ion

Expa

nd re

sour

ces

for

the

pres

erva

tion

of

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g”

Succ

essf

ully

sec

ured

a $

1 m

illio

n do

llars

gra

nt fr

om th

e Jo

hn D

. an

d Ca

ther

ine

T. M

acA

rthu

r Fou

ndat

ion.

Fun

ds w

ere

dedi

cate

d to

enh

ance

HCI

DLA’

s Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Pres

erva

tion

Prog

ram

(A

HPP)

dat

a sy

stem

, per

sonn

el, o

utre

ach

and

educ

atio

n, im

prov

e co

ordi

natio

n w

ith o

ther

City

and

fina

ncin

g ag

enci

es, a

nd d

irect

m

ore

reso

urce

s to

war

d pr

eser

ving

affo

rdab

le re

ntal

hou

sing.

“Thi

s pr

ogra

m m

et it

s

obje

ctiv

e.”

Mod

ify b

y re

mov

ing

pres

erva

tion

num

ber i

n ob

ject

ive.

Num

ber i

s un

achi

evab

le a

nd o

ther

pro

gram

s ad

dres

s th

e nu

mbe

r to

pres

erve

.

Page 32: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-32 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

5B. A

dvoc

ate

for A

fford

abili

ty

Pres

erva

tion

Fund

s

Supp

ort S

tate

and

Fe

dera

l Bill

s th

at p

rovi

de

fund

s fo

r pre

serv

ing

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g in

ea

ch le

gisla

tive

sess

ion

“The

Los

Ang

eles

Hou

sing

and

Com

mun

ity In

vest

men

t De

part

men

t (HC

IDLA

) tra

cked

and

sup

port

ed fe

dera

l and

st

ate

legi

slatio

n th

at w

ill in

crea

se re

sour

ces

and

regu

lato

ry

mod

ifica

tions

for t

he p

rese

rvat

ion

of fe

dera

lly-a

ssis

ted

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g at

-risk

of c

onve

rsio

n to

mar

ket-

rate

. The

HCI

DLA

trac

ked

and

supp

orte

d th

e

follo

win

g le

gisla

tion/

law

s:

● Tr

ansp

orta

tion,

Hou

sing,

and

Urb

an D

evel

opm

ent A

ppro

pria

tions

● N

atio

nal H

ousin

g Tr

ust F

und

(NHT

F)

● Re

ntal

Ass

ista

nce

Dem

onst

ratio

n (R

AD)

● Ho

mel

ess

Emer

genc

y A

ssis

tanc

e an

d Ra

pid

Tran

sitio

n to

Hou

sing

(HEA

RTH)

Act

CLA

activ

ity: S

ee re

spon

se u

nder

Pro

gram

1.1

.5.B

“”

Advo

cate

fo

r Sta

te a

nd F

eder

al H

ousin

g Fu

nds”

” on

pag

e 11

.”

Prog

ram

obj

ectiv

e w

as m

et.

“Com

bine

with

oth

er a

dvoc

acy

prog

ram

s to

cre

ate

new

Adv

ocat

e fo

r Hou

sing

Fund

s pr

ogra

m.

Mod

ify b

y re

mov

ing

pres

erva

tion

num

ber i

n ob

ject

ive.

Num

ber i

s un

achi

evab

le a

nd o

ther

pro

gram

s ad

dres

s th

e nu

mbe

r to

pres

erve

.”

1.2.

5C. T

enan

t and

Te

nant

-App

rove

d N

onpr

ofit B

uyou

ts o

f At

-Risk

Bui

ldin

gs

“Cre

ate

an e

ffect

ive

stra

tegy

to a

ssis

t in

tena

nt a

nd te

nant

-ap

prov

ed n

onpr

ofit

buyo

uts

of a

fford

able

ho

usin

g pr

ojec

ts w

here

at

-risk

uni

ts w

ould

rem

ain

affo

rdab

le u

nder

tena

nt

or n

onpr

ofit c

ontr

ol

Iden

tify

the

poss

ible

fu

ndin

g so

urce

s, in

clud

ing

a re

com

men

ded

set a

side

of fu

ndin

g re

sour

ces

appr

opria

te p

er y

ear”

Stud

y in

itiat

ed in

200

8 re

sulti

ng in

the

City

Cou

ncil

inst

ruct

ing

the

City

Att

orne

y’s

Offi

ce a

nd D

epar

tmen

t of

City

Pla

nnin

g to

furt

her r

evie

w p

rogr

ams

such

as

the

Dist

rict

of C

olum

bia’

s Te

nant

Opp

ortu

nity

to P

urch

ase

Act (

TOPA

) an

d pr

ovid

e le

gal a

naly

sis (i

nclu

ding

a re

view

of t

he E

llis

Act)

rela

tive

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f a s

imila

r law

/pro

gram

in

Los

Ang

eles

. No

HCID

LA o

r CRA

/LA

subs

eque

ntly.

Prog

ram

not

impl

emen

ted

Rem

ove

1.2.

5D. L

os A

ngel

es

Inte

r-Age

ncy

Pres

erva

tion

Wor

king

Gro

up

“City

wid

e an

d su

breg

iona

l ef

fort

s to

cre

ate

stra

tegi

es fo

r pre

serv

ing

at-r

isk h

ousin

g

Regu

lar r

epor

ts o

n st

rate

gies

iden

tified

Activ

ities

hav

e be

en c

arrie

d ou

t thr

ough

the

Los

Ang

eles

Pre

serv

atio

n W

orki

ng G

roup

(LA

PWG

). M

eetin

gs w

ere

held

qua

rter

ly. T

he H

CIDL

A ha

s be

en p

art o

f the

cor

e gr

oup

that

led

thes

e m

eetin

gs a

nd e

ffort

s.

The

LAPW

G h

as b

een

effe

ctiv

e in

enl

argi

ng

the

grou

p an

d id

entif

ying

str

ateg

ies

for p

rese

rvin

g at

-risk

hou

sing.

Rem

ove

as s

tand

alon

e pr

ogra

m.

Mod

ified

pro

gram

obj

ectiv

es b

eing

co

nsol

idat

ed in

to a

noth

er p

rogr

am

(Pre

serv

e Af

ford

able

Hou

sing)

.

1.2.

5E. N

ew G

ener

atio

n Fu

nd –

Pre

serv

atio

n of

At-

Risk

Hou

sing

Supp

ort p

rese

rvat

ion

of

640

low

-inco

me

units

NG

F no

t tar

getin

g at

-risk

pro

ject

s.N

ot e

ffect

ive.

Re

mov

e.

1.2.

6A. R

ent S

tabi

lizat

ion

Ord

inan

ce (R

SO)

Mai

ntai

n re

gist

ratio

n of

63

3,00

0 un

its a

nnua

lly.

Prot

ect t

enan

ts fr

om

unre

ason

able

rent

in

crea

ses

whi

le p

rovi

ding

la

ndlo

rds

with

a ju

st

and

reas

onab

le re

turn

Regi

stra

tion

of a

ppro

xim

atel

y 63

8,00

0 RS

O u

nits

is re

quire

d an

nual

ly. R

SO c

ontin

ues

in e

ffect

& fu

lly o

pera

tiona

l. $1

mill

ion

RSO

Stu

dy c

ompl

eted

& fi

ndin

gs &

reco

mm

enda

tions

forw

arde

d to

Ci

ty C

ounc

il. O

utre

ach

& ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

com

plet

ed &

out

reac

h ex

pand

ed. R

SO li

mits

/pre

vent

s ar

bitr

ary

evic

tions

. App

roxi

mat

ely

2,10

0 la

ndlo

rd d

ecla

ratio

ns o

f int

ent t

o ev

ict w

ere

proc

esse

d &

appr

oxim

atel

y 1,

687

tena

nt h

ouse

hold

s w

ere

prov

ided

app

roxi

mat

ely

$16

mill

ion

in re

loca

tion

assis

tanc

e th

roug

h HC

IDLA

con

trac

tor.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

.

Page 33: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-33

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

6B. H

ousin

g Ch

oice

Vo

uche

r Pro

gram

Mai

ntai

n 37

,000

Sec

tion

8 vo

uche

rs fo

r ver

y lo

w-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

HAC

LA h

as a

tota

l of m

ore

than

47,

500

vouc

hers

fo

r ver

y lo

w-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

.Ve

ry e

ffect

ive,

exc

eedi

ng o

bjec

tive.

Co

ntin

ue w

ith a

im o

f con

tinui

ng to

st

ream

line

of p

rogr

am a

dmin

istr

atio

n

1.2.

6C. S

ectio

n 8

Vouc

hers

for D

isab

led

and

Elde

rly H

ouse

hold

s

Cont

inue

to p

rovi

de

518

vouc

hers

HAC

LA h

as a

tota

l of m

ore

than

47,

500

vouc

hers

fo

r ver

y lo

w-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

.

Effe

ctiv

e. O

bjec

tive

revi

sed

base

d on

HU

D ap

prov

ed a

lloca

tion.

Sub

ject

to

Cong

ress

iona

l exp

endi

ture

s.Pr

ogra

m s

houl

d co

ntin

ue a

s-is

.

1.2.

6D. R

eal E

stat

e O

wne

d (R

EO) A

cqui

sitio

n

“50

REO

pro

pert

ies

purc

hase

d by

low

-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

50 R

EO p

rope

rtie

s pu

rcha

sed

by m

oder

ate-

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds”

This

prog

ram

was

com

bine

d w

ith th

e N

SP -

Fore

clos

ed

Prop

ertie

s pr

ogra

m d

escr

ibed

bel

ow.

This

prog

ram

was

com

bine

d w

ith th

e N

SP -

Fore

clos

ed P

rope

rtie

s pr

ogra

m d

escr

ibed

bel

ow.

Rem

ove.

Pro

gram

’s in

tent

is

larg

ely

dupl

icat

ed b

y N

SP.

1.2.

6E. N

eigh

borh

ood

Stab

iliza

tion

Prog

ram

—Fo

recl

osed

Pro

pert

ies

“1,0

00 m

oder

ate

inco

me

units

(120

%

of A

MI)

or b

elow

ac

quire

d, re

habi

litat

ed,

and

reso

ld/re

nted

25 p

erce

nt o

f all

fund

ing

for v

ery

low

inco

me

units

(5

0% o

f AM

I) an

d be

low

As

of th

e en

d of

201

2 N

SP a

cqui

red

a to

tal o

f 839

hou

sing

units

in

clud

ing

202

Sing

le F

amily

, 87

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

(2-4

) and

550

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

(5+

). N

SP h

as re

habb

ed a

tota

l of 2

79 h

ousin

g un

its in

clud

ing

145

Sing

le F

amily

, 51

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

(2-4

) and

83

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

(5+

).

This

prog

ram

is c

urre

ntly

on-

goin

g an

d w

ill m

eet

the

HUD

expe

nditu

re d

eadl

ines

sch

edul

ed fo

r Fe

b. 2

013

and

Mar

ch 2

014.

As

prog

ram

inco

me

is ge

nera

ted

the

hous

ing

unit

obje

ctiv

es w

ill b

e m

et.

Reta

in

1.2.

6F. M

ortg

age

Reve

nue

Bond

Fin

anci

ng

– Af

ford

able

Uni

ts in

M

arke

t Rat

e Ho

usin

g

Reha

bilit

ate

90 u

nits

fo

r ver

y lo

w-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

Sinc

e 20

06, H

CIDL

A ha

s is

sued

bon

ds fo

r 55

affo

rdab

le

units

in m

arke

t rat

e m

ixed

-inco

me

hous

ing

Not

effe

ctiv

eRe

tain

1.2.

7A. H

isto

ric

Pres

erva

tion

“25

units

per

yea

r in

his

toric

str

uctu

res

for m

oder

ate

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds

Acce

ssib

le u

nit(s

) in

ever

y pr

ojec

t”

At le

ast 5

his

toric

pre

serv

atio

n-re

late

d af

ford

able

hou

sing

proj

ects

ha

ve b

een

fund

ed s

ince

200

6, w

ith a

tota

l of 2

56 a

fford

able

uni

ts.

Prog

ram

was

effe

ctiv

e; h

owev

er th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

has

rem

oved

the

mai

n fu

ndin

g so

urce

for r

ehab

ilita

ting

and

pres

ervi

ng

hist

oric

bui

ldin

gs a

s af

ford

able

hou

sing.

Reta

in h

isto

ric p

rese

rvat

ion

prog

ram

bu

t foc

us m

ore

on d

esig

natin

g hi

stor

ic

and

cultu

rally

sig

nific

ant n

eigh

borh

oods

as

His

toric

Pre

serv

atio

n O

verla

y Zo

nes

(HPO

Zs) a

nd in

divi

dual

bui

ldin

gs a

s Hi

stor

ic C

ultu

ral M

onum

ents

(HCM

s). S

uch

desig

natio

ns a

llow

his

toric

resid

entia

l bu

ildin

gs to

qua

lify

for t

ax c

redi

ts

and

othe

r fina

ncia

l inc

entiv

es fo

r the

ir re

habi

litat

ion

and

adap

tive

reus

e. E

xplo

re

the

prov

ision

of a

dditi

onal

ince

ntiv

es

for t

he re

habi

litat

ion

of a

fford

able

ho

usin

g an

d fo

r low

-inco

me

hom

eow

ners

of

his

toric

pro

pert

ies

in H

POZs

.

1.2.

7B. I

ncen

tives

for

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g in

Hi

stor

ic P

rese

rvat

ion

Ove

rlay

Zone

s

Reha

bilit

atio

n of

10

hom

es o

ccup

ied

by

low

-inco

me

hous

ehol

ds

in H

POZs

ann

ually

No

spec

ific

ince

ntiv

es fo

r the

reha

bilit

atio

n of

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g Lo

s A

ngel

es’ h

isto

ric d

istr

icts

wer

e cr

eate

d du

ring

the

plan

ning

pe

riod.

How

ever

, DCP

did

cre

ate

a se

ries

of in

form

atio

nal b

roch

ures

on

in E

nglis

h an

d Sp

anish

to d

emys

tify

the

HPO

Z pr

oces

s an

d hi

stor

ic h

ome

repa

ir te

chni

ques

. In

addi

tion,

the

City

app

lied

for a

nd w

as a

ppro

ved

as a

Cer

tified

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t in

2007

, w

hich

mak

es it

eas

ier t

o fin

d gr

ant f

undi

ng fo

r suc

h pr

ogra

ms.

Onl

y pa

rtia

lly e

ffect

ive,

yet

the

City

rem

ains

co

mm

itted

to fi

ndin

g w

ays

to a

ssis

t lo

w-in

com

e pr

oper

ty o

wne

rs o

f his

toric

pr

oper

ties

to re

habi

litat

e th

eir p

rope

rtie

s in

a h

isto

rical

ly s

ensi

tive

man

ner.

Mer

ge p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

with

Hi

stor

ic P

rese

rvat

ion

prog

ram

.

Page 34: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-34 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.2.

7C. M

ills

Act

Impl

emen

tatio

n25

hom

es a

nnua

llyA

tota

l of 3

48 M

ills

Act c

ontr

acts

wer

e pr

oces

sed

by th

e Ci

ty fr

om 2

006

thro

ugh

2012

. The

pro

pert

ies

are

able

to q

ualif

y fo

r red

uced

pro

pert

y ta

xes.

Very

effe

ctiv

e, e

xcee

ded

obje

ctiv

es. H

owev

er,

it is

diffi

cult

to tr

ack

how

man

y ho

mes

wer

e re

habi

litat

ed fo

r low

-inco

me

owne

rs a

nd re

nter

s.Re

tain

.

1.2.

8A. R

ent S

tabi

lizat

ion

Trai

ning

Pro

gram

“Com

plet

e de

velo

pmen

t of

trai

ning

mat

eria

ls

Dist

ribut

e in

form

atio

n”

HCID

LA c

anno

t leg

ally

com

pel p

rope

rty

purc

hase

rs &

new

man

ager

s to

att

end

prop

erty

man

agem

ent t

rain

ing.

Lan

dlor

ds in

Ren

t Es

crow

Acc

ount

Pro

gram

(REA

P) a

re re

quire

d to

att

end

Prop

erty

M

anag

emen

t Tra

inin

g Pr

ogra

m (P

MTP

) cla

sses

& o

ther

s m

ay a

tten

d vo

lunt

arily

. HCI

DLA

coor

dina

tes

& pr

ovid

es tr

aini

ng fo

r 24

PMTP

se

ssio

ns a

nnua

lly fo

r app

roxi

mat

ely

720

land

lord

s &

man

ager

s.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

(but

is d

uplic

ativ

e?)

Rem

ove

1.2.

8B. P

rope

rty

Man

agem

ent

Trai

ning

Pro

gram

Trai

ning

com

plet

ed fo

r 3,

413

man

agem

ent e

ntiti

es

Fisc

al Y

ears

200

6 th

roug

h 20

12, H

CIDL

A re

ferr

ed 1

2,04

0 pr

oper

ty

owne

rs w

ho fa

iled

to c

ompl

y w

ith H

CIDL

A or

ders

to re

pair

heal

th

and

safe

ty c

ode

viol

atio

ns to

par

ticip

ate

in th

e Pr

oper

ty M

anag

emen

t Tr

aini

ng P

rogr

am to

rece

ive

inst

ruct

ion

pert

aini

ng to

pro

pert

y m

anag

emen

t, m

aint

enan

ce, l

egal

, and

fire

-life

saf

ety

topi

cs.

The

prog

ram

fulfi

lls th

e sp

irit a

nd p

urpo

se o

f Ch

apte

r XV,

Art

icle

4, S

ectio

n 15

4.00

of t

he

Los

Ang

eles

Mun

icip

al C

ode

by e

duca

ting

prop

erty

ow

ners

who

lack

the

expe

rienc

e an

d ex

pert

ise

to m

anag

e th

eir p

rope

rtie

s.

Reta

in

1.3.

1A. C

oast

al

Zone

Mon

itorin

g

“Ann

ual r

epor

ts o

n th

e st

atus

of t

he a

fford

able

ho

usin

g st

ock

in th

e Co

asta

l Zon

e

Mon

itor a

nd e

nfor

ce

com

plia

nce

with

af

ford

abili

ty c

oven

ants

“At l

east

7 n

ew h

ousin

g de

velo

pmen

ts w

ith a

fford

able

uni

ts

in th

e Co

asta

l Zon

e w

ere

appr

oved

by

DCP

from

200

6 to

20

11, r

esul

ting

in th

e ap

prov

al o

f 34

new

affo

rdab

le u

nits

.

The

City

has

trac

ked

the

num

ber o

f affo

rdab

le u

nits

cr

eate

d in

the

Coas

tal Z

one

on a

n an

nual

bas

is th

roug

h th

e A

nnua

l Pro

gres

s Re

port

of t

he H

ousin

g El

emen

t”

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e, b

ecau

se th

e A

PR

did

not l

ist C

oast

al Z

one

units

in s

ome

year

s. A

sep

arat

e Co

asta

l Zon

e re

port

w

as n

ot fo

und

to b

e ne

cess

ary.

Mer

ge re

port

ing

obje

ctiv

es w

ith A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g M

onito

ring

prog

ram

.

1.3.

1B. A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g M

onito

ring

“Ann

ual r

epor

ts o

n th

e st

atus

of t

he a

fford

able

ho

usin

g in

vent

ory

Mon

itor a

nd e

nfor

ce

com

plia

nce

with

af

ford

abili

ty c

oven

ants

A da

taba

se o

f exi

stin

g ho

usin

g un

its c

ityw

ide

serv

ing

very

lo

w-,

low

- and

mod

erat

e-in

com

e ho

useh

olds

, inc

ludi

ng th

e lo

catio

n, a

fford

abili

ty e

xpira

tion

date

, and

inco

me

leve

l se

rved

was

mai

ntai

ned

and

repo

rted

on

an a

nnua

l bas

is.

Com

plia

nce

with

cov

enan

ts w

as m

onito

red

by H

CIDL

A.

Inco

rpor

atio

n of

affo

rdab

ility

cov

enan

t inf

orm

atio

n in

to Z

IMA

S re

mai

ned

on-h

old

pend

ing

budg

et a

nd s

taff

reso

urce

s.

Effe

ctiv

e.

Reta

in

1.3.

1C. C

ityw

ide

Hous

ing

Prod

uctio

n Sy

stem

“Cre

ate

new

inte

r-de

part

men

tal s

yste

m

Gen

erat

e re

port

s”

In 2

010,

CHP

S im

plem

enta

tion

/ dev

elop

men

t wer

e co

mpl

eted

. CH

PS h

as b

een

in p

rodu

ctio

n sin

ce th

en. C

HPS

syst

em a

llow

s pa

rtne

rs to

upl

oad

data

via

File

Tra

nsfe

r Pro

toco

l (FT

P) a

nd

gene

rate

repo

rts.

Pha

se II

was

com

plet

ed in

Dec

embe

r 201

0.

Phas

e II

incl

udes

onl

ine

form

for d

irect

dat

a en

try

by e

ach

agen

cy

and

mor

e re

port

s su

ch a

s un

its s

umm

ary,

fund

ing

sum

mar

y an

d de

tail

proj

ect d

ata.

Dat

a fo

r pro

ject

s fro

m 2

008

to 2

012

wer

e co

llect

ed fr

om H

CIDL

A, C

RA, H

ACLA

, HCI

DLA

Land

Use

gr

oup

and

Build

ing

& Sa

fety

. Dat

a re

conc

iliat

ion

& cl

ean-

up

for p

roje

cts

betw

een

2008

and

201

2 w

ere

com

plet

ed.

Effe

ctiv

e an

d ha

s la

rgel

y m

et o

bjec

tives

in

des

igni

ng a

nd c

reat

ing

the

CHPS

sy

stem

. The

repo

rtin

g pa

rt o

verla

ps w

ith

anot

her p

rogr

am a

nd c

an b

e m

erge

d.

Reta

in.

1.3.

1D. R

SO M

onito

ring

Ann

ual r

epor

t on

the

stat

us o

f RSO

pro

pert

ies

Regi

stra

tion

of a

ppro

xim

atel

y 63

8,00

0 RS

O u

nits

is re

quire

d an

nual

ly. R

SO D

eter

min

atio

ns u

nit r

evie

ws

exem

ptio

ns &

mai

ntai

ns

findi

ngs

& re

cord

s in

BIM

S sy

stem

. Dem

oliti

ons

of R

SO u

nits

are

tr

acke

d th

roug

h re

quire

d fil

ings

of l

andl

ord

decl

arat

ions

of i

nten

t to

evic

t for

dem

oliti

on &

per

man

ent r

emov

al fr

om th

e re

ntal

hou

sing

mar

ket.

App

roxi

mat

ely

225

rem

oval

app

licat

ions

wer

e pr

oces

sed.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

.

Page 35: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-35

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.3.

1E. I

nven

tory

Upd

ate

Ann

ual r

epor

t on

deve

lopm

ent o

f si

tes

incl

uded

in th

e In

vent

ory

of S

ites

A re

port

on

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f site

s in

clud

ed in

th

e Si

te In

vent

ory

has

not b

een

com

plet

ed.

Not

effe

ctiv

e at

mee

ting

obje

ctiv

es

due

to s

taff

and

budg

et re

sour

ces.

Reta

in -

the

City

aim

s to

trac

k de

velo

pmen

t of

site

s id

entifi

ed in

the

Hous

ing

Elem

ent t

hrou

gh th

e A

nnua

l Pro

gres

s Re

port

mec

hani

sm u

sing

Geo

grap

hic

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

tech

nolo

gy.

1.3.

1F. M

onito

r Hou

sing

Prod

uctio

n G

oals

Perio

dic

repo

rt o

n th

e Ci

ty’s

hous

ing

prod

uctio

n an

d pr

eser

vatio

n go

als

and

acco

mpl

ishm

ents

“Con

sider

able

impr

ovem

ents

to th

e w

ay h

ousin

g pr

oduc

tion

gets

mon

itore

d to

ok p

lace

dur

ing

the

plan

ning

per

iod,

incl

udin

g th

roug

h th

e Ci

tyw

ide

Hous

ing

Prod

uctio

n Sy

stem

(CHP

S)

and

the

Ann

ual P

rogr

ess

Repo

rt o

f the

Hou

sing

Elem

ent.

HCID

LA, i

n co

oper

atio

n w

ith H

ACLA

and

LA

HSA

com

pile

in

form

atio

n on

all

assis

ted

units

cre

ated

dur

ing

the

year

.

LAHS

A on

a y

early

bas

is up

date

s th

e Ho

usin

g an

d Se

rvic

es

Inve

ntor

y th

at g

ets

subm

itted

to H

UD.

Thi

s re

port

is

vett

ed w

ith th

e 10

Hom

eles

s Co

aliti

ons

and

Plan

ning

Bo

dies

thro

ugho

ut th

e Co

unty

of L

os A

ngel

es.

CRA

/LA

mon

itore

d pr

oduc

tion

of a

fford

able

hou

sing

to c

ompl

y w

ith re

deve

lopm

ent l

aw, fi

led

annu

al H

CD re

port

, and

trac

ked

prod

uctio

n an

d Lo

w M

od In

com

e Ho

usin

g Fu

nd e

xpen

ditu

re d

ata

for

Five

-Yea

r Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

s. P

repa

red

agen

cy-w

ide

repo

rts.”

Mos

tly e

ffect

ive,

alth

ough

a s

tand

-alo

ne h

ousin

g pr

oduc

tion

repo

rt w

as n

ever

com

plet

ed. T

he

Hous

ing

Elem

ent A

nnua

l Pro

gres

s Re

port

(A

PR) c

ompi

led

all m

arke

t and

ass

iste

d ho

usin

g pr

oduc

ed d

urin

g th

e ca

lend

ar y

ear.

In a

dditi

on, D

CP c

ompi

led

quar

terly

and

an

nual

sum

mar

ies

on re

siden

tial b

uild

ing

perm

it ac

tivity

and

pos

ted

it on

its

web

site

.

Reta

in, a

lthou

gh a

dd re

port

ing

in

the

title

to m

ake

clea

r the

pro

gram

is

abou

t bot

h m

onito

ring

and

repo

rtin

g on

hou

sing

prod

uctio

n da

ta.

1.3.

1G. A

nnua

l Rep

ort o

n th

e Ci

ty’s

Hous

ing

Stoc

k

“Qua

rter

ly a

nd a

nnua

l re

port

s on

resid

entia

l bu

ildin

g ac

tivity

Perio

dic

repo

rt o

n ch

ange

s in

the

rent

al

hous

ing

stoc

k”

Qua

rter

ly a

nd a

nnua

l rep

orts

for 2

006-

2010

hav

e be

en p

oste

d on

DC

P w

ebsi

te. D

ata

for p

art o

f 201

0, a

nd a

ll of

201

1-20

212

have

not

be

en p

oste

d du

e to

sta

ff re

duct

ions

as

a re

sult

of b

udge

t cut

s.

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e, b

ut d

eclin

ing

budg

ets

and

staf

f res

ourc

es h

ave

ham

pere

d th

e re

port

ing

effo

rt in

rece

nt y

ears

.

Mer

ge w

ith e

xist

ing

prog

ram

(M

onito

r Hou

sing

Prod

uctio

n G

oals)

du

e to

sim

ilarit

y of

obj

ectiv

es.

1.3.

1H. M

onito

r the

Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Ince

ntiv

es P

rogr

am

Perio

dic

repo

rt o

n af

ford

able

hou

sing

units

pr

oduc

ed a

s a

resu

lt of

la

nd u

se in

cent

ives

The

Hous

ing

Elem

ent A

nnua

l Pro

gres

s Re

port

(APR

) com

pile

d al

l den

sity

bon

us u

nits

pro

duce

d du

ring

the

cale

ndar

yea

r. A

repo

rt o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of d

ensi

ty b

onus

dev

elop

men

ts

for w

hich

cov

enan

ts w

ere

exec

uted

from

Janu

ary

1,20

05

thro

ugh

Dece

mbe

r 31,

200

9 w

as c

ompl

eted

in a

May

11,

20

11 re

port

(C.F

. 11-

0600

-S63

). Ho

wev

er th

e re

port

did

not

go

into

suf

ficie

nt d

etai

l to

mee

t the

pro

gram

obj

ectiv

es.

Part

ially

effe

ctiv

e. M

ore

deta

iled

repo

rts

are

need

ed to

ade

quat

ely

inve

stig

ate

the

effic

acy

of th

e la

nd u

se in

cent

ives

con

tain

ed

in th

e Ci

ty’s

dens

ity b

onus

pro

gram

.

Cont

inue

as

a st

anda

lone

pro

gram

, as

mon

itorin

g th

e de

nsity

bon

us p

rogr

am

rem

ains

a h

igh

prio

rity

for t

he C

ity.

1.3.

2A. A

dvoc

acy

for S

tate

and

Fed

eral

Da

ta P

rodu

ctio

n

Supp

ort S

tate

and

Fed

eral

bi

lls th

at p

rovi

de fo

r the

pr

oduc

tion

and

colle

ctio

n of

dat

a th

at s

uppo

rts

the

City

’s pl

anni

ng n

eeds

The

City

adv

ocat

ed fo

r bill

s th

at p

rovi

ded

for

grea

ter p

rodu

ctio

n an

d co

llect

ion

of d

ata.

A ve

ry n

arro

w p

rogr

am a

nd o

bjec

tive.

Can

be

com

bine

d w

ith o

ther

adv

ocac

y pr

ogra

m.

Com

bine

with

oth

er a

dvoc

acy

prog

ram

s to

cre

ate

new

Adv

ocat

e fo

r Hou

sing

Fund

s pr

ogra

m.

1.3.

2B. C

olla

bora

tion

on D

ata

Prod

uctio

n an

d Co

llect

ion

“Add

ition

al d

ata

from

Fe

dera

l, St

ate,

regi

onal

an

d Co

unty

age

ncie

s

Hom

eles

s Co

unt w

ith C

ity

of L

os A

ngel

es d

ata”

The

City

wid

e Ho

usin

g Pr

oduc

tion

Syst

em (C

HPS)

was

cre

ated

in

2010

. It a

llow

s ag

ency

par

tner

s to

upl

oad

hous

ing

proj

ect d

ata,

en

ter d

ata

dire

ctly

into

the

syst

em a

nd g

ener

ate

repo

rts

such

as

uni

ts s

umm

ary,

fund

ing

sum

mar

y an

d de

tail

othe

r pro

ject

da

ta. D

ata

for p

roje

cts

from

200

8 to

201

2 w

ere

colle

cted

from

HC

IDLA

, CRA

, HAC

LA, H

CIDL

A La

nd U

se g

roup

and

Bui

ldin

g &

Safe

ty. D

ata

reco

ncili

atio

n &

clea

n up

was

com

plet

ed. L

AHS

A cr

eate

d an

d sh

ared

its

own

data

on

the

hom

eles

s po

pula

tion

thro

ugh

the

Hom

eles

s Co

unt a

nd a

ccom

pani

ed re

port

.

Has

been

effe

ctiv

e at

incr

easin

g co

llabo

ratio

n on

dat

a pr

oduc

tion

and

colle

ctio

n.Re

tain

.

Page 36: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-36 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.3.

2C. C

ensu

s 20

10Ce

nsus

form

s an

d m

etho

dolo

gies

that

bet

ter

refle

ct th

e Ci

ty’s

need

s

“Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic W

orks

/Bur

eau

of E

ngin

eerin

g re

spon

ded

to th

e Ce

nsus

Bur

eau’

s an

nual

Bou

ndar

y A

nnex

atio

n Su

rvey

to re

view

and

sub

mit

geog

raph

ic

info

rmat

ion

that

ens

ures

an

accu

rate

cen

sus

for t

he C

ity.

The

May

or’s

Offi

ce e

ngag

ed in

a ro

bust

cam

paig

n to

sup

port

th

e co

mpl

ete

coun

t effo

rts.

The

May

or’s

Offi

ce w

ill c

ontin

ue to

ad

voca

te fo

r cou

ntin

g m

etho

dolo

gies

that

ens

ure

a fa

ir co

unt a

nd

shar

e of

fede

ral r

esou

rces

that

are

bas

ed o

n po

pula

tion

coun

ts.”

The

City

ass

iste

d th

e U.

S. C

ensu

s Bu

reau

with

ou

trea

ch a

nd e

duca

tion

in o

rder

to o

btai

n m

ore

com

plet

e an

d ac

cura

te d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d re

port

ing

in th

e 20

10 C

ensu

s. It

is n

ot b

elie

ved

any

effo

rts

have

resu

lted

in s

peci

fic im

prov

emen

ts

in C

ensu

s fo

rms

and

met

hodo

logi

es th

at

bett

er re

flect

the

City

’s ho

usin

g ne

eds.

Reta

in. C

ensu

s 20

20 fa

lls w

ithin

the

plan

ning

per

iod.

The

Cen

sus

rem

ains

a

key

data

sou

rce

for a

sses

sing

the

City

’s ho

usin

g ne

eds.

1.3.

3A. H

ousin

g N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent b

y Co

mm

unity

Pla

n A

rea

“Ado

pt re

visio

ns o

f Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns th

at

incl

ude

the

desig

natio

n of

app

ropr

iate

loca

tions

an

d de

nsiti

es o

f hou

sing

Adop

t im

plem

enta

tion

mea

sure

s to

ass

ure

that

su

ch s

ites

are

desig

nate

d an

d zo

ned

appr

opria

tely

Deve

lop

diffe

rent

sce

nario

s fo

r eac

h co

mm

unity

to

reac

h fa

ir sh

are

goal

s in

the

Com

mun

ity P

lans

w

here

upd

ates

will

not

be

com

plet

ed b

y 20

14

and

cond

uct p

ublic

pa

rtic

ipat

ion

proc

ess

to

disc

uss

and

sele

ct th

e pr

efer

red

scen

ario

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns h

ave

been

, or w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

by

2014

. Ea

ch re

visio

n in

clud

ed th

e de

signa

tion

of a

ppro

pria

te lo

catio

ns

and

dens

ities

of h

ousin

g, in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Fram

ewor

k El

emen

t pol

icie

s fo

r dire

ctin

g gr

owth

. The

y al

so in

clud

ed v

ario

us

hous

ing-

rela

ted

polic

ies

and

prog

ram

s. A

par

ticul

ar e

mph

asis

on

impl

emen

tatio

n m

easu

res

to c

arry

out

the

polic

ies

and

prog

ram

s of

eac

h pl

an is

a h

allm

ark

of th

is ro

und

of C

omm

unity

Pla

ns.

A to

tal o

f 4,1

97 a

dditi

onal

hou

sing

units

cap

acity

ha

s be

en a

dded

to th

e Ci

ty a

s a

resu

lt of

the

1 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns d

evel

oped

sin

ce 2

006

(Hol

lyw

ood)

. Few

er C

omm

unity

Pla

ns th

an

antic

ipat

ed h

ave

been

dev

elop

ed, d

ue to

sta

ff an

d bu

dget

lim

itatio

ns. H

owev

er th

ose

that

ha

ve m

ove

forw

ard

larg

ely

met

the

obje

ctiv

es.

One

exc

eptio

n is

the

“fai

r sha

re”

affo

rdab

le

hous

ing

goal

s fo

r eac

h co

mm

unity

. Whi

le p

lans

ta

ke in

to a

ccou

nt 2

030

popu

latio

n pr

ojec

tions

fo

r eac

h co

mm

unity

and

gen

eral

ly e

ncou

rage

an

equ

itabl

e di

strib

utio

n of

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g th

roug

hout

the

plan

are

a, e

xplic

it af

ford

able

ho

usin

g un

it go

als

are

not b

eing

ado

pted

.

Cont

inue

, but

rem

ove

“fai

r sha

re”

conc

ept.

1.3.

3B. D

atab

ase

for

Eval

uatin

g Ho

usin

g N

eeds

“Dat

abas

e of

cur

rent

so

cioe

cono

mic

and

de

mog

raph

ic d

ata

Perio

dic

repo

rts

of

soci

oeco

nom

ic a

nd

dem

ogra

phic

dat

a”

DCP

mai

ntai

ned

a da

taba

se o

f soc

ioec

onom

ic a

nd d

emog

raph

ic

info

rmat

ion

and

prod

uced

repo

rts

upon

requ

est.

Staf

f and

bud

get c

uts

have

str

etch

ed th

e Ci

ty’s

reso

urce

s in

this

area

in re

cent

yea

rs,

alth

ough

pro

gres

s co

ntin

ues

to b

e m

ade.

Cont

inue

.

1.3.

3C. A

djus

t Pro

duct

ion

and

Pres

erva

tion

Goa

ls on

A P

erio

dic

Basis

Perio

dic

adju

stm

ent o

f ho

usin

g pr

oduc

tion

and

pres

erva

tion

goal

s an

d pr

ogra

m p

riorit

ies

Not

a H

ousin

g pr

ogra

m w

ith o

bjec

tives

and

goa

lsN

ot e

ffect

ive

Rem

ove

Page 37: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-37

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.4.

1A. D

ensi

ty B

onus

“Ado

pt a

men

dmen

ts

to th

e Zo

ning

Cod

e to

re

flect

cur

rent

Sta

te

dens

ity b

onus

law

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g In

cent

ives

Pro

gram

G

uide

lines

to fa

cilit

ate

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

mos

t rec

ent d

ensi

ty

bonu

s re

quire

men

ts

45 v

ery

low

inco

me

units

ann

ually

129

low

inco

me

units

ann

ually

118

mod

erat

e in

com

e un

its a

nnua

lly”

A to

tal o

f 185

Den

sity

Bon

us p

roje

cts

rece

ived

affo

rdab

le

hous

ing

cove

nant

s fro

m 2

006-

2011

, to

prod

uce

3,45

3 af

ford

able

uni

ts a

nd 7

,890

tota

l uni

ts.

The

dens

ity b

onus

pro

gram

has

bee

n ef

fect

ive,

how

ever

pro

duct

ion

of a

fford

able

ho

usin

g in

“m

arke

t rat

e” d

evel

opm

ents

has

ge

nera

lly b

een

low

, due

to th

e ov

erw

helm

ing

maj

ority

of p

roje

cts

optin

g to

pro

vide

(fe

wer

) ver

y lo

w-in

com

e un

its ra

ther

than

(m

ore)

low

- or m

oder

ate-

inco

me

units

.

Cont

inue

with

goa

l of i

mpr

ovin

g th

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

fford

able

uni

ts,

part

icul

arly

aro

und

Tran

sit S

tops

/M

ajor

Em

ploy

men

t Cen

ters

.

1.4.

1B. D

ownt

own

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Bo

nus

“Ado

pt a

men

dmen

ts to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

to im

plem

ent

ince

ntiv

es in

Dow

ntow

n

40 m

oder

ate,

30 lo

w, a

nd

30 v

ery

low

inco

me

affo

rdab

le u

nits

ann

ually

Sinc

e th

e G

DHIA

ord

inan

ce b

ecam

e ef

fect

ive

in 2

007

until

201

1,

a to

tal o

f 580

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g un

its h

ave

been

inco

rpor

ated

in

eig

ht p

ropo

sed

or b

uilt

resid

entia

l dev

elop

men

ts d

ownt

own.

40

4 of

the

affo

rdab

le u

nits

hav

e be

en p

erm

itted

thro

ugh

2012

.

The

Ord

inan

ce w

as a

dopt

ed b

ut p

rodu

ctio

n ha

s no

t bee

n as

hig

h as

ant

icip

ated

due

m

ostly

to th

e ch

ange

in m

arke

t con

ditio

ns

at th

e tim

e of

ado

ptio

n. W

hile

ther

e ha

s be

en in

crea

sed

inte

rest

in 2

012,

the

City

m

ay n

eed

to e

xam

ine

way

s to

incr

ease

usa

ge

of th

e pr

ogra

m if

it d

oes

not p

ick

up.

Cont

inue

with

goa

l of i

mpr

ovin

g th

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

fford

able

uni

ts,

part

icul

arly

aro

und

Tran

sit S

tops

/M

ajor

Em

ploy

men

t Cen

ters

.

1.4.

1C. A

fford

able

Hou

sing

in th

e Co

asta

l Zon

e (M

ello

Ac

t Im

plem

enta

tion)

“Ado

pt a

men

dmen

ts

to th

e Zo

ning

Cod

e to

im

plem

ent i

nclu

siona

ry

and

repl

acem

ent

hous

ing

requ

irem

ents

in

the

Coas

tal Z

one

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g In

cent

ives

Pro

gram

G

uide

lines

to fa

cilit

ate

impl

emen

tatio

n of

af

ford

able

hou

sing

requ

irem

ents

in th

e Co

asta

l Zon

e

45 v

ery

low

inco

me

units

30 lo

w in

com

e un

its

50 m

oder

ate

inco

me

units

No

amen

dmen

ts to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

rega

rdin

g im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

Mel

lo A

ct h

ave

been

mad

e. In

201

2 th

e Ci

ty C

ounc

il in

stru

cted

th

e Ci

ty A

ttor

ney

and

the

Hous

ing

Depa

rtm

ent t

o re

view

the

Mel

lo

Act a

nd re

port

rela

tive

to a

dopt

ion

of a

per

man

ent M

ello

Ord

inan

ce.

The

prog

ram

has

not

bee

n ef

fect

ive

in

refe

renc

e to

ado

ptin

g th

e Co

de A

men

dmen

ts

for i

mpl

emen

ting

the

Stat

e’s

Mel

lo A

ct. I

n lie

u of

a lo

cal o

rdin

ance

, the

City

has

bee

n sim

ply

impl

emen

ting

Stat

e la

w re

gard

ing

affo

rdab

le

hous

ing

requ

irem

ents

in th

e Co

asta

l Zon

e.

Cont

inue

with

the

sam

e ob

ject

ives

.

Page 38: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-38 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.4.

1D. E

xped

ite

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Pr

ojec

ts

“Ado

pt a

men

dmen

ts to

th

e Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Ince

ntiv

es P

rogr

am

Gui

delin

es to

faci

litat

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

expe

dite

d pr

oces

ses

for a

fford

able

hou

sing

deve

lopm

ent

Prio

ritiz

e af

ford

able

ho

usin

g pr

ojec

ts to

ex

pedi

te p

roce

ssin

g of

per

mits

and

any

re

late

d en

title

men

ts

Redu

ce b

uild

ing

perm

it pr

oces

sing

time

by

up to

3 m

onth

s

Redu

ce e

ntitl

emen

t pr

oces

sing

time

by

up to

3 m

onth

s”

DBS

allo

ws

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g pr

ojec

ts to

take

adv

anta

ge o

f the

Pa

ralle

l Des

ign

Perm

ittin

g Pr

ogra

m (P

DPP)

and

Dev

elop

men

t Ser

vice

s Ca

se M

anag

emen

t (DS

CM) a

t low

er th

resh

olds

than

pro

ject

s w

ithou

t af

ford

able

hou

sing

(20

units

vs.

50)

. Bo

th p

roce

sses

gre

atly

ass

ist i

n th

e pe

rmitt

ing

proc

ess.

Affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g pr

ojec

ts h

ave

gene

rally

no

t rec

eive

d pr

iorit

y/ex

pedi

ted

entit

lem

ent p

roce

ssin

g, w

ith th

e ex

cept

ion

of th

ose

who

pay

the

addi

tiona

l fee

for E

xped

ited

Serv

ices

.

Very

effe

ctiv

e in

term

s of

the

perm

ittin

g pr

oces

s, b

ut n

ot a

s m

uch

for e

xped

iting

af

ford

able

hou

sing

proj

ects

thro

ugh

the

plan

ning

and

ent

itlem

ent p

roce

ss.

Cont

inue

with

rene

wed

focu

s on

fin

ding

a w

ay to

exp

edite

or s

trea

mlin

e th

e en

title

men

t pro

cess

, par

ticul

arly

fo

r affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g pr

ojec

ts.

1.4.

2A. C

omm

unity

Pla

n Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Targ

ets

Brea

k do

wn

the

city

wid

e RH

NA

hous

ing

goal

s pl

us

othe

r unm

et h

ousin

g ne

eds

(fair

shar

e go

als)

am

ong

the

35 c

omm

unity

pla

ns b

y af

ford

abili

ty le

vel a

nd u

nits

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns h

ave

been

, or w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

by

2014

. Ea

ch re

visio

n in

clud

ed v

ario

us p

olic

ies

and

prog

ram

s pr

omot

ing

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g. H

owev

er, n

o pr

ecis

e af

ford

able

hou

sing

targ

ets

base

d on

RHN

A fig

ures

hav

e be

en p

ut fo

rwar

d.

Whi

le p

lans

take

into

acc

ount

203

0 po

pula

tion

proj

ectio

ns fo

r eac

h co

mm

unity

an

d ge

nera

lly e

ncou

rage

an

equi

tabl

e di

strib

utio

n of

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g th

roug

hout

th

e pl

an a

rea,

exp

licit

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g un

it go

als

are

not b

eing

ado

pted

.

Rem

ove,

as

the

prog

ram

is d

uplic

iativ

e of

ano

ther

(Hou

sing

Nee

ds A

sses

smen

t by

Com

mun

ity P

lan

Are

) and

doe

s no

t app

ear l

ikel

y to

be

adop

ted.

1.4.

2B. N

eigh

borh

ood

Leve

l Affo

rdab

le

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

s

“Cne

tral

City

Wes

t: 67

0 lo

w-in

com

e un

its

Play

a Vi

sta:

190

mod

erat

e-in

com

e fo

r-sal

e an

d 10

0 lo

w-in

com

e re

ntal

uni

ts

in P

hase

1, a

nd 1

25

mod

erat

e-in

com

e fo

r-sa

le a

nd 8

3 lo

w-in

com

e re

ntal

uni

ts in

Pha

se 2

War

ner C

ente

r: 12

00-

1300

wor

kfor

ce h

ousin

g un

its (2

00 p

er y

ear f

or th

e ne

xt 6

yea

rs) b

y 20

14”

A to

tal o

f 482

affo

rdab

le u

nits

wer

e pr

oduc

ed in

Pla

ya V

ista

, w

ith a

n ad

ditio

nal 3

19 C

ontr

olle

d Pr

ice

Uni

ts (u

nits

who

se re

sale

pr

ice

is lim

ited)

. In

War

ner C

ente

r, a

num

ber o

f dev

elop

men

ts

wer

e ap

prov

ed w

ith m

oder

ate

inco

me

units

requ

ired,

how

ever

th

e Pa

lmer

vs.

Los

Ang

eles

dec

ision

in 2

009

allo

wed

thos

e de

velo

pmen

ts to

be

cons

truc

ted

with

out t

he a

fford

able

uni

ts.

The

prog

ram

was

mee

ting

its o

bjec

tives

un

til th

e Pa

lmer

vs.

City

of L

os A

ngel

es

cour

t dec

ision

in 2

009,

whi

ch e

ffect

ivel

y ru

led

that

City

requ

irem

ents

to li

mit

rent

leve

ls on

new

con

stru

ctio

n vi

olat

ed

the

Stat

e’s

Cost

a Ha

wki

ns A

ct.

Revi

se p

rogr

am to

focu

s on

nex

t ste

ps in

en

cour

agin

g m

ixed

-inco

me

com

mun

ities

.

1.4.

2C. R

edev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

t Are

a Ho

usin

g Pr

ogra

ms

Adop

t inc

lusio

nary

af

ford

able

hou

sing

requ

irem

ents

with

in

each

rede

velo

pmen

t pr

ojec

t are

a’s

Five

Yea

r Pl

an in

con

form

ance

w

ith th

e Co

mm

unity

Re

deve

lopm

ent L

aw

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

Page 39: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-39

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.4.

2D. R

edev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

t Are

a W

orkf

orce

In

com

e Ho

usin

g Pr

ogra

ms

Adop

t Wor

kfor

ce

Inco

me

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

Gui

delin

es

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

1.5.

1A. P

rese

rvat

ion

Barr

iers

Ass

essm

ent

“Ide

ntify

dev

elop

men

t st

anda

rds

that

pos

e co

mpl

ianc

e di

fficu

lties

for

pres

erva

tion

proj

ects

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

to

alle

viat

e ch

alle

nges

The

prog

ram

has

rem

aine

d on

hol

d pe

ndin

g bu

dget

and

sta

ff re

sour

ces.

Not

bee

n ef

fect

ive,

alth

ough

a 2

012

Coun

cil

Mot

ion

and

rece

nt a

ctiv

ity a

roun

d th

e is

sue

have

pro

vide

d re

new

ed m

omen

tum

.Re

tain

, with

som

e ad

just

men

ts.

1.5.

1B. S

trea

mlin

ed R

evie

w

Proc

ess

for R

edev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

t Are

as

Redu

ce e

ntitl

emen

t pr

oces

sing

time

for

resid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t by

at l

east

3 m

onth

s

DCP

staf

f coo

rdin

ated

pro

ject

revi

ew w

ith C

RA/L

A st

aff

to s

trea

mlin

e an

d av

oid

dupl

icat

ion

of e

ffort

, inc

ludi

ng

desig

n re

view

and

the

prep

arat

ion

of e

nviro

nmen

tal r

evie

w

docu

men

tatio

n. B

udge

t and

sta

ff re

duct

ions

pre

vent

ed

furt

her i

mpr

ovem

ents

to e

ntitl

emen

t pro

cess

ing

time.

The

diss

olut

ion

of th

e Co

mm

unity

Red

evel

opm

ent

Agen

cy o

f LA

has

ende

d th

e pr

ogra

m.

Rem

ove,

giv

en th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.

1.5.

1C. I

mpr

ovem

ents

to

Entit

lem

ent P

roce

ssin

g

“Com

plet

e fe

e st

udy

of e

ntitl

emen

t pr

oces

sing

cost

s

Am

end

the

Zoni

ng

Code

to im

plem

ent

full

cost

reco

very

Redu

ce e

ntitl

emen

t pr

oces

sing

time

for

resid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t by

at l

east

3 m

onth

s

Redu

ce th

e nu

mbe

r of

City

dep

artm

ents

in

volv

ed in

app

rovi

ng a

nd

signi

ng-o

ff fo

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

issu

ance

Fee

stud

ies

and

corr

espo

ndin

g Co

de a

men

dmen

ts h

ave

been

m

ade

that

hav

e im

prov

ed th

e co

st re

cove

ry a

nd ti

mel

y pr

oces

sing

of D

CP a

pplic

atio

ns fo

r mar

ket r

ate

proj

ects

. The

ope

ning

of

a ne

w in

ter-a

genc

y de

velo

pmen

t ser

vice

s ce

nter

has

had

a

maj

or b

enefi

cial

impa

ct o

n cu

stom

er s

ervi

ce. M

any

addi

tiona

l im

prov

emen

ts h

ave

been

mad

e to

ent

itlem

ent p

roce

ssin

g un

der

DCPs

dep

artm

enta

l reo

rgan

izat

ion

plan

, inc

ludi

ng o

rgan

izat

ion

by

geog

raph

y, a

con

solid

ated

and

cen

tral

ized

Maj

or P

roje

cts

Sect

ion,

an

d th

e “o

ne p

roje

ct, o

ne p

lann

er”

mod

el o

f cas

e pr

oces

sing.

The

prog

ram

has

bee

n ef

fect

ive

in m

akin

g im

prov

emen

ts to

the

entit

lem

ent p

roce

ss.

Reta

in, w

ith s

ome

adju

stm

ents

. Refl

ect

prog

ress

that

has

bee

n m

ade

1.5.

1D. D

evel

opm

ent

and

Desig

n St

anda

rds

“Red

uce

need

for

entit

lem

ents

for r

esid

entia

l de

velo

pmen

t pro

ject

s

Incl

ude

deve

lopm

ent

and

desig

n st

anda

rds

in

16 C

omm

unity

Pla

ns”

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd d

esig

n st

anda

rds

are

bein

g cr

eate

d th

roug

h th

e 6

new

Com

mun

ity P

lans

that

will

tailo

r dev

elop

men

t reg

ulat

ions

in

ord

er to

enh

ance

the

uniq

ue c

hara

cter

of n

eigh

borh

oods

whi

le

acco

mm

odat

ing

grow

th a

t pre

ferr

ed lo

catio

ns. I

mpl

emen

tatio

n in

clud

es d

esig

n gu

idel

ines

, as

wel

l as

spec

ific

tool

s su

ch a

s th

e Co

mm

unity

Pla

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Ove

rlay

(CPI

O),

Com

mun

ity

Desig

n O

verla

y (C

DO

), Hi

stor

ic P

rese

rvat

ion

Ove

rlay

Zone

(H

POZ)

, Gro

und

Floo

r Com

mer

cial

zon

ing

desig

nato

r (G

FC),

and

Pede

stria

n Em

phas

is De

sign

zoni

ng d

esig

nato

r (PE

D).

Effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew

Com

mun

ity P

lans

has

not

bee

n as

hig

h as

an

ticip

ated

due

to b

udge

t and

sta

ff cu

ts.

Reta

in w

ith n

ew e

mph

asis

on u

se o

f Com

mun

ity P

lan

Impl

emen

tatio

n O

verla

y di

stric

ts.

1.5.

1E. Z

onin

g Co

de R

efor

m

“Ado

pt Z

onin

g Co

de

amen

dmen

ts to

st

ream

line

the

revi

ew

and

appr

oval

pro

cess

Adop

t var

ious

pac

kage

s of

gro

uped

cod

e am

endm

ents

A m

ajor

ove

rhau

l/rev

ision

of t

he C

ity’s

Zoni

ng C

ode

has

begu

n in

201

2. T

he re

visio

n is

expe

cted

to b

e co

mpl

eted

by

2017

.

A m

ore

ambi

tious

revi

sion

to th

e Co

de th

an

envi

rone

d ha

s co

mm

ence

d. T

he m

ajor

ity o

f the

w

ork

will

take

pla

ce in

the

next

pla

nnin

g cy

cle.

Cont

inue

, with

a re

flect

ion

of th

e m

ajor

Zo

ning

Cod

e ov

erha

ul u

nder

way

and

the

oppo

rtun

ities

that

brin

gs fo

r res

iden

tial

deve

lopm

ent t

o m

ove

tow

ards

the

goal

s an

d po

licie

s of

of t

he G

ener

al P

lan.

Page 40: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-40 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.5.

1F. A

men

d th

e Zo

ning

Co

de to

Fac

ilita

te N

on-

Conv

entio

nal H

ousin

g

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

to

acco

mm

odat

e in

nova

tive

mul

tifam

ily ty

pes

Ord

inan

ce in

dev

elop

men

t to

allo

w b

y-rig

ht li

cens

ed

com

mun

ity c

are

faci

litie

s. T

he O

rdin

ance

wen

t bef

ore

the

City

Cou

ncil

in e

arly

201

3, a

nd w

as re

ferr

ed to

a

wor

king

com

mitt

ee to

furt

her r

efine

the

legi

slatio

n.

The

Ord

inan

ce h

as b

een

cont

rove

rtia

l and

bee

n am

ende

d se

vera

l tim

es. W

ork

cont

inue

s.

Reta

in

1.5.

1G. U

pdat

e th

e Lo

s A

ngel

es B

uild

ing

Code

Adop

t the

CBC

The

new

bui

ldin

g co

de w

as u

pdat

ed in

201

1 to

inco

rpor

ate

prov

ision

s of

the

2009

Inte

rnat

iona

l Bui

ldin

g Co

de

the

2010

Cal

iforn

ia B

uild

ing

Code

. The

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Code

was

add

ed to

the

Code

at t

he e

nd o

f 201

0.

Has

met

obj

ectiv

es.

Can

rem

ove.

1.5.

1H. C

ompl

ete

Com

mun

ity P

lan

EIRs

Min

imal

env

ironm

enta

l re

view

(i.e

., N

egat

ive

Decl

arat

ion)

requ

ired

for r

esid

entia

l de

velo

pmen

t pro

ject

s

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

n an

d co

rres

pond

ing

Prog

ram

EIR

s ha

ve e

ither

be

en c

ompl

eted

or a

re in

an

adva

nced

sta

ge o

f dev

elop

men

t.

Effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew

Com

mun

ity P

lans

has

not

bee

n as

hig

h as

an

ticip

ated

due

to b

udge

t and

sta

ff cu

ts.

Reta

in

1.5.

1I. M

odifi

catio

ns

to S

mal

l Lot

Su

bdiv

ision

Pro

cess

“Ide

ntify

dev

elop

men

t st

anda

rds,

cod

e re

quire

men

ts, a

nd

proc

edur

es th

at p

ose

com

plia

nce

diffi

culti

es fo

r sm

all l

ot s

ubdi

visio

ns

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

to

alle

viat

e ch

alle

nges

Out

reac

h to

dev

elop

ers

and

arch

itect

s on

impr

ovem

ents

to

the

prog

ram

’s po

licie

s an

d pr

oced

ures

beg

an

in 2

011

and

mee

tings

took

pla

ce in

201

2.

Sign

ifica

nt p

rogr

ess

has

been

mad

e to

id

entif

y in

effic

ienc

ies

and

way

s to

impr

ove

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

Smal

l Lot

Su

bdiv

ision

s pr

ogra

m, h

owev

er m

uch

of th

e ne

cess

ary

chan

ges

have

not

yet

ocu

rred

.

Mer

ge p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

with

Sm

all

Lot S

ubdi

visio

ns p

rogr

am, a

s th

e tw

o ar

e du

plic

ativ

e of

one

ano

ther

.

1.5.

1J. M

odifi

catio

ns to

Se

cond

Uni

t (“G

rann

y Fl

at”)

Pro

cess

“Ide

ntify

dev

elop

men

t st

anda

rds

and

code

re

quire

men

ts th

at p

ose

com

plia

nce

diffi

culti

es

to S

econ

d U

nit P

roce

ss

Adop

t am

endm

ents

to

the

Zoni

ng C

ode

to

alle

viat

e ch

alle

nges

ZA M

emo

#120

was

issu

ed in

201

0 to

pro

vide

gui

danc

e on

impl

emen

ting

Stat

e pr

ovisi

ons

gove

rnin

g th

e de

velo

pmen

t of s

econ

d un

its o

n re

siden

tial l

ots.

No

Zoni

ng C

ode

Am

endm

ents

hav

e be

en p

ropo

sed.

Zoni

ng C

ode

amen

dmen

t was

not

de

term

ined

to b

e ne

eded

.

Mer

ge w

ith re

late

d pr

ogra

m (A

ltern

ativ

e M

ulti-

Fam

ily D

evel

opm

ent)

to

crea

te n

ew S

econ

d U

nit (

“Gra

nny

Flat

” Pr

oces

s” p

rogr

am.

1.5.

1K. S

trea

mlin

e Af

ford

able

Hou

sing

Cove

nant

Pro

cess

“Red

uce

time

need

ed

to p

repa

re a

fford

able

ho

usin

g co

vena

nts

Redu

ce ti

me

need

ed

to o

btai

n cl

eara

nce

from

HCI

DLA

for

build

ing

perm

its

Ann

ual r

epor

t on

cove

nant

pro

duct

ion

and

proc

essin

g tim

e”

“A g

uide

for p

repa

ring

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g co

vena

nts

was

pro

duce

d in

Oct

ober

201

1 an

d pu

t on

the

Hous

ing

Depa

rtm

ent’s

web

site

. Gui

delin

es fo

r

the

Depa

rtm

ent’s

han

dlin

g of

cov

enan

ts w

ere

upda

ted

on D

ecem

ber

2010

. A L

and

Use

dat

abas

e is

used

to tr

ack

the

prog

ress

of c

oven

ant

prep

arat

ion.

A L

and

Use

dat

abas

e is

used

to tr

ack

the

prog

ress

of

cov

enan

t pre

para

tion.

The

“”B

uild

LA”

” w

orki

ng g

roup

aim

s to

str

eam

line

all a

spec

ts o

f the

per

mit

appl

icat

ion

proc

essin

g.”

HCID

LA’s

Land

Use

cov

enan

t pro

gram

has

un

derg

one

signi

fican

t cha

nges

, whi

ch h

ave

elim

inat

ed b

ackl

og, r

educ

ed ti

me

to p

roce

ss,

and

prov

ided

acc

urat

e tr

acki

ng a

nd re

port

ing.

Dele

te.

Page 41: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-41

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

1.5.

2A. I

nter

-age

ncy

and

Inte

r-jur

isdi

ctio

nal

Coor

dina

tion

Leve

rage

7:1

(ins

tead

of

curr

ent 4

:1) i

n ad

ditio

nal

Coun

ty, r

egio

nal,

Stat

e an

d Fe

dera

l fun

ds to

lo

cal f

unds

for r

esid

entia

l de

velo

pmen

t

“The

mos

t rec

ent l

ever

age

ratio

(201

1) fo

r AHT

F pr

ojec

ts w

as

3.85

:1 a

nd 6

.22:

1 fo

r per

man

ent s

uppo

rtiv

e ho

usin

g pr

ojec

ts.

The

City

has

take

n a

lead

ersh

ip ro

le in

the

deve

lopm

ent

of e

ffect

ive

part

ners

hips

that

leve

rage

publ

ic a

nd p

rivat

e fu

ndin

g so

urce

s, li

ke th

e Ho

me

for

Goo

d Fu

nder

’s Co

llabo

rativ

e, a

nd to

coo

rdin

ate

thes

e re

sour

ces

to s

erve

the

man

y di

ffere

nt s

ub-p

opul

atio

ns o

f ho

mel

ess

and

at-r

isk in

divi

dual

s an

d fa

mili

es in

LA

.

As

the

Cont

inuu

m o

f Car

e le

ad a

nd C

olla

bora

tive

App

lican

t, LA

HSA

subm

its o

n an

ann

ual b

asis

the

Supe

rNO

FA a

pplic

atio

n fo

r fed

eral

fu

nds.

In 2

011

and

2012

, the

Req

uest

for P

ropo

sal (

RFP)

incl

uded

a

join

t crit

eria

dev

elop

ed in

con

junc

tion

with

the

Hous

ing

Auth

oriti

es.

HAC

LA c

oord

inat

ed th

e Pe

rman

ent S

uppo

rtiv

e Ho

usin

g N

OFA

with

HCI

DLA

and

Los

Ang

eles

Cou

nty

in 2

011.

Whi

le th

e pr

ogra

m a

ims

broa

dly

for i

nter

-ag

ency

and

inte

r-jur

isdi

ctio

nal c

oord

inat

ion,

it

lack

s sp

ecifi

c ob

ject

ives

in th

at re

gard

. G

reat

er c

oord

inat

ion

does

not

nec

essa

rily

lead

to g

reat

er le

vera

ging

ratio

s.

Rem

ove

2.1.

1A. C

rime

Prev

entio

n th

roug

h En

viro

nmen

tal

Desig

n (C

PTED

)

40 re

siden

tial p

roje

cts

give

n te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e an

d re

com

men

datio

ns

annu

ally

DCP

enco

urag

ed, a

nd in

som

e ca

ses

requ

ired,

con

sulta

tion

with

the

LA P

olic

e De

pt. (

LAPD

) and

thei

r Des

ign

Out

Crim

e G

uide

lines

: Crim

e Pr

even

tion

Thro

ugh

Envi

ronm

enta

l Des

ign.

LA

PD’s

Crim

e Pr

even

tion

Uni

t con

sulte

d w

ith p

rivat

e de

velo

pers

to

inco

rpor

ate

CPTE

D te

chni

ques

into

pro

ject

s. T

he C

PTED

te

chni

ques

are

als

o in

corp

orat

ed in

to H

ACLA

pub

lic h

ousin

g si

tes.

Mos

tly e

ffect

ive,

alth

ough

the

goal

of 4

0 pr

ojec

ts a

yea

r app

ears

to b

e to

o am

bitio

us.

Rem

ove

the

prog

ram

, as

it do

es n

ot

dire

ctly

rela

te to

the

Stat

e’s

Hous

ing

Elel

emen

t req

uire

men

ts a

nd th

ere

are

no

sche

dule

d ac

tions

bey

ond

carr

ying

out

th

e co

nsul

tatio

ns o

n an

ad-

hoc

basis

.

2.1.

1B. N

eigh

borh

ood

Wat

ch

Tech

nica

l sup

port

and

as

sista

nce

to 2

0 ne

w

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d W

atch

pr

ogra

ms

annu

ally

Data

not

ava

ilabl

e.N

ot k

now

n.Re

mov

e th

e pr

ogra

m, a

s it

does

no

t dire

ctly

rela

te to

the

Stat

e’s

Hous

ing

Elel

emen

t req

uire

men

ts.

2.1.

1C. S

afer

City

Initi

ativ

e

“10%

redu

ctio

n in

cr

imin

al a

ctiv

ity o

n Sk

id R

ow a

nnua

lly

400

hom

eles

s pe

rson

s di

rect

ed to

hou

sing

and

serv

ice

prog

ram

s an

nual

ly”

“Ope

ratio

n He

alth

y St

reet

was

laun

ched

in 2

011

to

clea

n Sk

id R

ow s

tree

ts a

nd p

rovi

de a

cle

aner

and

sa

fer e

nviro

nmen

t. Fi

ve m

iles

of s

tree

t and

sidew

alks

wer

e cl

eane

d. P

erso

nal l

ocke

r sys

tem

in

crea

sed

by 5

00 u

nits

for a

tota

l of 1

136

lock

ers

for

the

hom

eles

s. A

new

bat

hroo

m, s

how

er a

nd

laun

dry

faci

lity

wer

e m

ade

avai

labl

e. T

he C

ity a

lso

open

ed a

n ab

ando

ned

item

90-

day

stor

age

prog

ram

fo

r ite

ms

left

in S

kid

Row

so

the

hom

eles

s

coul

d cl

aim

them

.”

Una

ble

to v

erify

whe

ther

pro

gram

ob

ject

ives

hav

e be

en m

et.

Rem

ove

the

prog

ram

, as

it do

es

not d

irect

ly re

late

to th

e St

ate’

s Ho

usin

g El

elem

ent r

equi

rem

ents

.

2.1.

2A. H

ealth

-bas

ed

Buffe

r Zon

es fo

r Re

siden

tial N

eigh

borh

oods

“Est

ablis

h ap

prop

riate

bu

ffers

in 1

2 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns

Mak

e m

odifi

catio

ns to

th

e Zo

ning

Cod

e an

d pr

ojec

t-ba

sed

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

as n

eces

sary

In 2

012

an A

dvis

ory

Not

ice

to p

roje

cts

with

in 1

,000

feet

of f

reew

ays

in L

os A

ngel

es w

as a

ppro

ved

by th

e Ci

ty P

lann

ing

Com

mis

sion.

Thi

s is

an in

form

atio

nal n

otic

e fo

r the

pur

pose

of c

allin

g at

tent

ion

to e

xist

ing

adop

ted

goal

s, o

bjec

tives

, pol

icie

s, a

nd p

rogr

ams

in th

e G

ener

al P

lan

that

add

ress

land

use

com

patib

ility

with

resp

ect t

o th

e si

ting

near

fre

eway

s of

new

resid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t and

sen

sitiv

e la

nd u

ses.

The

N

otic

e su

mm

ariz

es s

tand

ard

proj

ect c

ondi

tions

com

mon

ly a

pplie

d to

free

way

-adj

acen

t res

iden

tial p

roje

cts

and

reco

mm

ends

pro

ject

de

sign

feat

ures

that

cou

ld h

elp

to im

prov

e pu

blic

hea

lth o

utco

mes

. Th

e Ad

viso

ry N

otic

e w

ould

not

cre

ate

addi

tiona

l dis

cret

iona

ry

revi

ew o

r oth

erw

ise

mod

ify e

stab

lishe

d th

resh

olds

of C

EQA

revi

ew.

Heal

th-b

ased

buf

fers

wer

e no

t offi

cial

ly a

dopt

ed

in C

omm

unity

Pla

ns o

r the

Zon

ing

Code

, how

ever

m

itiga

tions

and

pro

ject

con

ditio

ns w

ere

ofte

n im

pose

d by

the

City

Pla

nnin

g Co

mm

issio

n or

DC

P fo

r dis

cret

iona

ry p

roje

cts

with

in a

cer

tain

di

stan

ce o

f fre

eway

s (o

ften

500

feet

), de

pend

ing

on in

divi

dual

ass

essm

ents

of s

peci

fic c

ondi

tions

.

Rem

ove

the

prog

ram

, as

it do

es n

ot

dire

ctly

rela

te to

the

Stat

e’s

Hous

ing

Elel

emen

t req

uire

men

ts a

nd n

o ad

ditio

nal i

mpl

emen

tatio

n ac

tiviti

es a

re

sche

dule

d fo

r the

pla

nnin

g pe

riod.

Page 42: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-42 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.1.

2B. R

educ

ing

Cons

truc

tion-

Rela

ted

Pollu

tion

“Rev

ised

con

stru

ctio

n-re

late

d po

llutio

n gu

idel

ines

Chan

ges

to Z

onin

g Co

de, B

uild

ing

Code

and

pr

ojec

t-ba

sed

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

as n

eces

sary

Cons

truc

tion

rela

ted

pollu

tion

regu

latio

ns w

ere

enac

ted

as p

art o

f th

e Ci

ty’s

adop

tion

of th

e G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de in

Dec

embe

r 201

0.

Effe

ctiv

e in

ena

ctin

g re

quire

men

ts to

redu

ce

cons

truc

tion-

rela

ted

pollu

tion,

alth

ough

the

adop

tion

of th

e G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de (t

he 2

010

Calif

orni

a G

reen

Bui

ldin

g St

anda

rds)

was

not

en

visio

ned

in th

e pr

evio

us H

ousin

g El

emen

t.

Rem

ove,

as

the

cons

truc

tion-

rela

ted

pollu

tion

redu

ctio

ns h

ave

been

em

bedd

ed in

the

Build

ing

Code

.

2.1.

2C. I

ncre

ase

Acce

ss

to P

arks

, Rec

reat

ion

and

Gre

en S

pace

s

Incr

ease

d ac

cess

ibili

ty

to p

arks

and

ope

n sp

aces

des

igna

ted

in 1

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

n U

pdat

es

“DCP

and

the

Plan

ning

Com

mis

sion

deve

lope

d “S

tree

ts 4

Peo

ple”

, a

pilo

t pro

gram

to c

reat

e sm

all p

arks

, bic

ycle

faci

litie

s, o

r ped

estr

ian

amen

ities

usin

g ex

cess

righ

t-of

-way

. The

City

has

als

o be

gin

the

crea

tion

of “

park

lets

”, w

hich

invo

lve

exte

ndin

g sid

ewal

ks fo

r pu

blic

sea

ting,

gar

dens

, bik

e pa

rkin

g an

d ot

her a

men

ities

.

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns w

ere

com

plet

ed, e

ach

incl

udin

g po

licie

s an

d pr

ogra

ms

to fa

cilit

ate

acce

ss to

par

ks a

nd o

pen

spac

es.”

Wor

k pr

ogre

ssed

on

all o

f the

ele

men

ts

in th

e pr

ogra

m d

escr

iptio

n. T

he p

rogr

am

was

larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e in

incr

easin

g ac

cess

to

par

ks, r

ecre

atio

n an

d gr

een

spac

e.

Rem

ove

the

prog

ram

, as

it do

es n

ot

dire

ctly

rela

te to

the

Stat

e’s

Hous

ing

Elem

ent r

equi

rem

ents

and

doe

s no

t hav

e qu

antifi

able

obj

ectiv

es.

Add

stat

emen

t to

Polic

y 2.

4.3.

2.2.

1A. Z

onin

g an

d N

eigh

borh

ood

Impl

emen

tatio

n To

ols

for

Mix

ed U

se D

evel

opm

ent

“1,0

00 h

ousin

g un

its in

m

ixed

use

dev

elop

men

t

Iden

tify

targ

ets

in a

ll Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns

Adop

t ord

inan

ces

if ap

prop

riate

“At l

east

8 c

ases

wer

e fil

ed fo

r zon

e ch

ange

s to

Res

iden

tial

Acce

ssor

y Se

rvic

es (R

AS)

zon

es, i

nclu

ding

116

1 un

its.

An

enab

ling

Ord

inan

ce c

reat

ing

a ne

w ty

pe o

f sup

plem

enta

l us

e di

stric

t, ca

lled

a Co

mm

unity

Pla

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Ove

rlay

(CPI

O) d

istr

ict w

as a

dopt

ed in

201

2. 5

Com

mun

ity P

lans

w

ere

deve

lope

d, w

hich

con

sider

ed m

ixed

-use

nod

es a

nd

boul

evar

ds a

nd re

quiri

ng m

ixed

-use

(and

/or g

roun

d-flo

or

com

mer

cial

) in

appr

opria

te a

reas

thro

ugh

the

use

of C

PIO

s,

alon

g w

ith d

esig

n st

anda

rds

for m

ixed

-use

dev

elop

men

ts.

DCP

has

rece

ntly

pro

pose

d a

mod

ifica

tion

to R

esid

entia

l Pla

nned

De

velo

pmen

t Dis

tric

ts (P

D), w

hich

wer

e de

signe

d m

ostly

for

mas

ter-

plan

ned

singl

e-fa

mily

nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds. T

he p

ropo

sal i

s to

ac

com

mod

ate

a br

oade

r ran

ge o

f infi

ll an

d m

ixed

-use

dev

elop

men

t.

Mix

ed-U

se O

verla

y Di

stric

ts, a

n ol

der s

uppl

emen

tal

zone

, has

not

bee

n ef

fect

ive

and

has

larg

ely

been

su

ppla

nted

by

RAS

zone

s an

d CP

IOs.”

Effe

ctiv

e in

cre

atin

g a

new

tool

to p

rom

ote

mix

ed-u

se d

evel

opm

ent.

Ano

ther

tool

is

bein

g m

odifi

ed to

faci

litat

e m

ixed

-us

e an

d in

fill d

evel

opm

ent.

Reta

in, g

iven

that

mor

e to

ols

are

bein

g de

velo

ped.

2.2.

1B. H

ealth

y N

eigh

borh

oods

“Ado

pt H

ealth

y N

eigh

borh

ood

Polic

y w

ith g

uide

lines

for

sust

aina

ble

prac

tices

an

d im

plem

ent p

olic

y

30 u

nits

for e

xtre

mel

y lo

w in

com

e (3

0%

AM

I) an

nual

ly

90 u

nits

for v

ery

low

inco

me

(50%

A

MI)

annu

ally

130

units

for a

bove

-m

oder

ate

inco

me

(up

to

200%

AM

I) an

nual

ly”

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

Page 43: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-43

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.2.

1C. C

hild

care

Fac

ilitie

s

“5 c

hild

care

faci

litie

s an

d 37

5 slo

ts in

re

siden

tial p

roje

cts

6 ch

ildca

re fa

cilit

ies

and

450

slots

in c

omm

erci

al

deve

lopm

ent a

nd/

or n

ear t

rans

it”

“The

resu

lts o

f CRA

/LA’

s Ch

ildca

re F

acili

ties

Polic

y ar

e un

able

to b

e de

term

ined

due

to th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

Rede

velo

pmen

t Age

ncie

s.

DCP

trac

king

of t

he d

evel

opm

ent o

f chi

ldca

re

faci

litie

s ha

s no

t tak

en p

lace

.”

Was

larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e at

mee

ting

prog

ram

ob

ject

ives

unt

il th

e 20

11 d

isso

lutio

n of

CRA

.Re

mov

e, g

iven

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A.

2.2.

2A. M

illio

n Tr

ees

LA –

Pub

lic P

rope

rty

and

Righ

ts-o

f-Way

300,

000

tree

s pl

ante

d on

pub

lic p

rope

rty

and

publ

ic ri

ghts

-of-w

ay

“Sin

ce th

e pr

ogra

m la

unch

in S

epte

mbe

r of 2

006,

M

illio

n Tr

ees

LA (M

TLA)

has

pla

nted

ove

r 330

,000

tree

s in

crea

sing

the

over

all n

ew tr

ee p

lant

ing

rate

by a

s m

uch

as 6

fold

. Prio

r to

the

MTL

A pr

ogra

m, t

he

City

, non

-pro

fits

and

new

dev

elop

men

ts w

as p

lant

ing

appr

oxim

atel

y 10

,000

ann

ually

(bas

ed o

n

City

’s U

rban

For

estr

y Di

visio

n in

form

atio

n).”

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e.Co

mbi

ne w

ith o

ther

Mill

ion

Tree

s LA

pro

gram

.

2.2.

2B. W

alka

bilit

y Ch

eckl

ist

Inte

grat

e W

alka

bilit

y Ch

eckl

ist i

nto

the

proj

ect r

evie

w p

roce

ss

The

Wal

kabi

lity

Chec

klis

t was

ado

pted

in N

ovem

ber 2

008

and

is no

w

inte

grat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t rev

iew

pro

cess

for a

ll di

scre

tiona

ry a

ctio

ns.

Prog

ram

has

met

its

obje

ctiv

e.Re

mov

e, a

s th

e pr

ogra

m

has

been

com

plet

ed.

2.2.

2C. U

rban

De

sign

Stud

io

“Est

ablis

h U

rban

Des

ign

Stud

io a

s a

divi

sion

with

in th

e DC

P

Mai

ntai

n U

rban

Des

ign

Stud

io w

ith a

n an

nual

op

erat

ing

budg

et

Incr

ease

sta

ff to

run

Urb

an D

esig

n St

udio

The

Urb

an D

esig

n St

udio

has

com

plet

ed C

ityw

ide

Desig

n G

uide

lines

(res

iden

tial,

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial

), th

e W

alka

bilit

y Ch

eckl

ist,

Dow

ntow

n De

sign

Gui

delin

es, C

entu

ry

City

Gre

en P

lan,

and

var

ious

oth

er im

port

ant c

ontr

ibut

ions

.

The

Urb

an D

esig

n St

udio

has

bee

n ef

fect

ive

in

prom

otin

g ob

ject

ives

, des

pite

lim

ited

reso

urce

s.Re

tain

, as

the

inte

ntio

n is

to m

aint

ain

the

Urb

an D

esig

n St

udio

.

2.2.

2D. S

torm

wat

er

Colle

ctio

n an

d M

itiga

tion

“Ado

pt o

n-si

te s

torm

wat

er

desig

n gu

idel

ines

Inte

grat

e on

-site

st

orm

wat

er d

esig

n gu

idel

ines

into

pro

ject

re

view

pro

cess

The

Low

-Impa

ct D

evel

opm

ent (

LID)

Ord

inan

ce, w

hich

effe

ctiv

ely

repl

aced

the

prev

ious

sto

rmw

ater

col

lect

ion

and

miti

gatio

ns p

rogr

am,

beca

me

effe

ctiv

e an

d ap

plic

able

to m

ost r

elev

ant p

roje

cts

in 2

012.

Mor

e th

at e

ffect

ive,

giv

en th

at th

e or

igin

al p

rogr

am o

bjec

tives

env

ision

ed

only

gui

delin

es a

s th

e go

al.

Reta

in a

nd m

erge

with

oth

er w

ater

pr

ogra

ms

(Gre

en S

tree

ts/M

anag

e W

ater

Res

ourc

es) f

or n

ew p

rogr

am

calle

d St

orm

wat

er M

itiga

tion.

2.2.

2E. G

reen

Str

eets

“Ado

pt s

torm

wat

er

desig

n gu

idel

ines

for

publ

ic ri

ghts

-of-w

ay

Inte

grat

e st

orm

wat

er

desig

n gu

idel

ines

into

pr

ojec

t rev

iew

pro

cess

re

gard

ing

need

ed o

ff-si

te im

prov

emen

ts”

“The

City

ado

pted

des

ign

guid

elin

es to

trea

t and

infil

trat

e st

orm

wat

er

runo

ff fro

m p

ublic

righ

ts o

f way

in re

siden

tial n

eigh

borh

oods

ca

lled

Gre

en S

tree

ts a

nd A

lleys

: Des

ign

Gui

delin

es S

tand

ards

(R

ainw

ater

Har

vest

ing

Prog

ram

). Ad

opte

d 20

09, i

t is

bein

g us

ed in

al

l str

eet c

apita

l im

prov

emen

t pro

ject

s an

d in

clud

es T

ree

Cano

pies

, Ve

geta

ted

Swal

es, I

nfitlr

atio

n (F

low

-Thr

u) P

lant

ers,

Per

viou

s Pa

ving

, In

filtr

atio

n Tr

ench

, Sto

rmw

ater

Cur

b Ex

tens

ions

and

Cur

b In

lets

.

Stor

mw

ater

des

ign

capt

ure

and

trea

tmen

t tec

hniq

ues

have

bee

n in

corp

orat

ed in

to p

roje

ct re

view

pro

cess

thro

ugh

the

LID

Ord

inan

ce.”

Prog

ram

has

met

its

obje

ctiv

es, a

lthou

gh

wor

k on

iden

tifyi

ng p

riorit

y G

reen

Str

eets

pr

ojec

ts, a

nd id

entif

ying

fund

ing

sour

ces

to

carr

y ou

t str

ateg

ic in

terv

entio

ns c

ontin

ues.

Mer

ge w

ith o

ther

wat

ersh

ed-r

elat

ed

prog

ram

s (S

torm

wat

er C

olle

ctio

n an

d M

itiga

tion

and

Man

age

Wat

er R

esou

rces

)

2.2.

2F. L

ands

cape

Des

ign

Inte

grat

e La

ndsc

ape

Ord

inan

ce in

to p

roje

ct

revi

ew p

roce

ss

Land

scap

e O

rdin

ance

con

tinue

d to

be

part

of p

roje

ct re

view

th

roug

hout

the

perio

d. D

CP p

repa

red

a Te

chni

cal B

ulle

tin fo

r DC

P st

aff r

egar

ding

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

Ord

inan

ce.

Land

scap

e de

sign

was

inco

rpor

ated

into

pr

ojec

t rev

iew

but

no

signi

fican

t oth

er

impl

emen

tatio

n ac

tions

took

pla

ce.

Reta

in.

Page 44: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-44 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.2.

3A. R

educ

ed

Requ

irem

ents

for

Hous

ing

near

Tra

nsit

“Ado

pt re

vise

d tr

affic

im

pact

stu

dy p

olic

ies

Redu

ce tr

affic

miti

gatio

n re

quire

men

ts fo

r ho

usin

g ne

ar tr

ansi

t”

“In

2011

, the

City

upd

ated

the

Traf

fic S

tudy

Gui

delin

es.

The

new

gui

delin

es c

ontin

ue to

allo

w p

roje

cts

near

tr

ansi

t to

redu

ce th

eir o

vera

ll as

sum

ed

vehi

cle

trip

gen

erat

ion.

Als

o, th

e ne

w g

uide

lines

list

ed p

ossib

le

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

aim

ed a

t fur

ther

redu

cing

veh

icle

trip

s fo

r re

siden

tial p

roje

cts

that

wou

ld re

sult

in s

igni

fican

t im

pact

s. T

rip

cred

it al

low

ance

has

bee

n w

idel

y us

ed b

y de

velo

pers

par

ticul

arly

in

tran

sit r

obus

t are

as. P

rogr

am h

as s

erve

d as

an

ince

ntiv

e fo

r pr

ojec

ts to

incl

ude

a re

siden

tial c

ompo

nent

for t

he a

dded

cre

dits

.”

The

prog

ram

has

bee

n su

cces

sful

in m

eetin

g its

obj

ectiv

e bu

t can

be

broa

dene

d.

Reta

in b

ut m

onito

r and

adj

ust i

f sup

port

ed

by re

sear

ch-b

ased

dat

a; c

onsid

er a

dditi

onal

cr

edits

for p

roje

cts

with

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g.

2.2.

3B. T

rans

it O

rient

ed

Dist

rict S

tudi

es

“Com

plet

e 10

tran

sit

orie

nted

dis

tric

t stu

dies

Inco

rpor

ate

stud

y re

com

men

datio

ns in

to

the

Com

mun

ity P

lans

Com

plet

ed 6

Exp

o Ph

ase

1 TO

D Vi

sion

Plan

s/St

udie

s, a

s w

ell

stud

ies

of G

old

Line

sta

tion

area

s (M

aria

chi,

Soto

, Ind

iana

) and

O

rang

e Li

ne s

tops

(Can

oga,

Res

eda,

Tar

zana

Cro

ssin

g) lo

okin

g at

m

arke

t pot

entia

l, ty

polo

gies

, str

ateg

ies,

etc

- to

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to C

omm

unity

Pla

n up

date

s, S

peci

fic P

lans

, CPI

Os,

etc

. Als

o co

mpl

eted

pla

nnin

g w

ork

on G

reen

and

Blu

e lin

es (P

roje

ct

REN

EW).

Sign

ifica

nt w

ork

now

taki

ng p

lace

on

11 fu

ture

Tra

nsit

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

ans

for t

he n

ext t

wo

light

-rai

l lin

es: E

xpo

Phas

e 2

and

Cren

shaw

/LA

X. T

he W

arne

r Cen

ter S

peci

fic P

lan

was

sig

nific

antly

exp

ande

d to

acc

omm

odat

e ad

ditio

nal r

esid

entia

l de

nsity

bas

ed o

n a

mar

ket s

tudy

and

ana

lysis

, and

the

Corn

field

A

rroy

o Sp

ecifi

c Pl

an (C

ASP

) als

o be

nefit

ted

from

mar

ket s

tudi

es.

Very

effe

ctiv

e - m

ore

than

10

TOD

stud

ies

that

ha

ve in

form

ed re

siden

tial p

lann

ing

and

zoni

ng

have

take

n pl

ace

durin

g th

e pl

anni

ng p

erio

d.

Reta

in, w

ith re

new

ed fo

cus

on n

ext T

OD

Plan

s an

d ho

usin

g go

als.

Exp

and

to

inco

rpor

ate

Tran

sit N

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

s.

2.2.

3C. I

nnov

ativ

e Pa

rkin

g St

rate

gies

“Com

plet

e st

udie

s of

pa

rkin

g al

tern

ativ

es

incl

udin

g m

axim

um

and

shar

ed p

arki

ng

feas

ibili

ty s

tudy

Inco

rpor

ate

park

ing

stud

y re

com

men

datio

ns

into

Com

mun

ity P

lans

an

d th

e Zo

ning

Cod

e w

here

app

ropr

iate

“The

Mod

ified

Par

king

Req

uire

men

ts (M

PR) O

rdin

ance

pas

sed

the

City

Pla

nnin

g Co

mm

issio

n in

201

1. T

he M

PR c

reat

es s

even

op

tiona

l par

king

requ

irem

ent m

odifi

catio

n to

ols

that

can

be

used

in d

iffer

ent a

reas

of t

he C

ity. T

he O

rdin

ance

wou

ld a

llow

: 1)

cha

nge

of u

se p

arki

ng s

tand

ards

, 2) u

se o

f a n

ew P

arki

ng

Redu

ctio

n Pe

rmit,

3) o

ff-si

te p

arki

ng w

ith 1

500

feet

, 4) d

ecre

ased

pa

rkin

g st

anda

rds,

5) i

ncre

ased

par

king

sta

ndar

ds, 6

)

com

mer

cial

par

king

cre

dits

and

7) m

axim

um p

arki

ng li

mits

.”

Very

effe

ctiv

e at

ena

blin

g th

e cr

eatio

n an

d ut

iliza

tion

of a

ltern

ativ

e pa

rkin

g st

rate

gies

tailo

red

for i

ndiv

idua

l are

as.

Reta

in, w

ith fo

cus

on im

plem

enta

tion.

M

erge

with

oth

er p

arki

ng p

rogr

am

(Off-

Site

Par

king

Opt

ions

)

2.2.

4A. C

onge

stio

n M

anag

emen

t Pro

gram

La

nd U

se S

trat

egy

“Rep

ort o

n al

l pro

ject

s de

velo

ped

and

all

dem

oliti

ons

arou

nd m

ajor

tr

ansi

t sta

tions

and

tran

sit

corr

idor

s an

nual

ly

Cert

ify c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

the

Los

Ang

eles

Cou

nty

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t Pr

ogra

m a

nnua

lly”

The

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t Pro

gram

repo

rt w

as c

ompl

eted

an

d ce

rtifi

ed a

s co

mpl

iant

with

the

Los

Ang

eles

Cou

nty

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t Pro

gram

dur

ing

the

plan

ning

per

iod.

Prog

ram

fulfi

lls a

requ

irem

ent f

or fu

ndin

g an

d he

lps

the

City

trac

k m

ixed

-use

and

tran

sit-

orie

nted

dev

elop

men

t. M

TA is

cur

rent

ly

eval

uatin

g ch

ange

s to

the

CMP

incl

udin

g re

plac

ing

the

debi

t/cr

edit

syst

em w

ith a

Co

unty

wid

e de

velo

pmen

t ass

essm

ent f

ee.

Reta

in. C

ity s

houl

d co

ntin

ue to

mon

itor

and

prov

ide

feed

back

to M

ETRO

on

any

pro

pose

d ch

ange

s to

the

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t Pro

gram

.

Page 45: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-45

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.2.

4B. J

obs/

Hous

ing

Bala

nce

Ince

ntiv

es:

Resid

entia

l Exe

mpt

ions

in

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Spec

ific

Plan

s

Add

fee

exem

ptio

n fo

r res

iden

tial u

nits

to

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sp

ecifi

c Pl

ans

that

gov

ern

empl

oym

ent c

ente

rs

Resid

entia

l use

s co

ntin

ue to

be

exem

pted

from

Tra

ffic

Impa

ct F

ees

in th

e fo

llow

ing

jobs

-hea

vy S

peci

fic P

lan

area

s: C

entr

al C

ity W

est,

Coas

tal A

rea

and

Wes

t Los

Ang

eles

. A re

cent

upd

ate

to th

e W

arne

r Ce

nter

Spe

cific

Pla

n re

-intr

oduc

ed fe

es o

n re

siden

tial d

evel

opm

ent i

n or

der t

o ca

ptur

e m

ore

fund

ing

for l

ocal

tran

spor

tatio

n im

prov

emen

ts.

How

ever

the

fees

wer

e ad

just

ed to

be

low

er fo

r mor

e de

nse

hous

ing

proj

ects

, com

pare

d to

less

. An

upda

te to

the

Coas

tal T

rans

port

atio

n Co

rrid

or S

peci

fic P

lan

is cu

rren

tly u

nder

way

. No

new

tran

spor

tatio

n-or

ient

ed S

peci

fic P

lans

wer

e ad

opte

d du

ring

the

plan

ning

per

iod.

The

prog

ram

has

not

bee

n w

holly

suc

cess

ful i

n m

eetin

g th

e ob

ject

ive

of re

tain

ing

resid

entia

l ex

empt

ions

for T

raffi

c Im

pact

Fee

s. T

here

has

al

so b

een

a la

ck o

f act

ivity

rega

rdin

g ne

w

tran

spor

tatio

n-or

ient

ed S

peci

fic P

lans

.

Reta

in a

s th

e pr

ogra

m a

nd it

s ob

ject

ives

re

mai

n im

port

ant t

o ad

dres

sing

the

jobs

-hou

sing

imba

lanc

e. M

odify

de

scrip

tion

to in

clud

e a

prov

ision

re

gard

ing

exem

ptin

g af

ford

able

hou

sing

and/

or T

OD

proj

ects

from

fees

.

2.2.

5A. E

duca

tion

abou

t G

row

th, H

ousin

g N

eed,

M

ixed

-Use

and

Mix

ed-

Inco

me

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds

“100

pre

sent

atio

ns

Deve

lop

trai

ning

cu

rric

ulum

Qua

rter

ly tr

aini

ng

wor

ksho

ps th

roug

hout

th

e Ci

ty o

f Los

Ang

eles

100

part

icip

atin

g ne

ighb

orho

od

coun

cil m

embe

rs a

nd

com

mun

ity o

rgan

izat

ion

mem

bers

ann

ually

“To

date

HRC

has

con

duct

ed 1

5 pr

esen

tatio

ns a

nd/

or w

orks

hops

to 1

5 di

ffere

nt n

eigh

borh

ood

coun

cils

. A

ppro

xim

atel

y 10

7 st

akeh

olde

rs. 6

NCs

in th

e Va

lley

regi

on,

3-N

E/Ea

st re

gion

, 4-S

outh

regi

on, 2

-Cen

tral

regi

on.

HAC

LA c

ontin

ued

to w

ork

with

Jord

an D

owns

Com

mun

ity A

dvis

ory

Com

mitt

ee a

nd th

e W

ATTS

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d co

unci

l to

prov

ide

trai

ning

an

d in

form

atio

n re

gard

ing

the

rede

velo

pmen

t of J

orda

n Do

wns

w

hich

is p

ropo

sed

to b

e a

mix

ed u

se a

nd m

ix in

com

e ne

ighb

orho

od.

CRA

/LA

cond

ucte

d ov

er 1

0 w

orks

hops

in th

e Ho

llyw

ood

and

East

Hol

lyw

ood

proj

ect a

reas

.

DCP

activ

ity o

n ho

ld p

endi

ng b

udge

t and

sta

ff re

sour

ces.”

Prog

ram

has

not

bee

n su

bsta

ntia

lly e

ffect

ive

in

educ

atin

g co

mm

uniti

es a

bout

gro

wth

, hou

sing

need

and

mix

ed-u

se/in

com

e co

mm

uniti

es. T

he

City

face

s re

sista

nce

on g

row

th is

sues

, eve

n w

hen

it is

bein

g di

rect

ed to

tran

sit-a

djac

ent a

reas

an

d ce

nter

s. A

dditi

onal

edu

catio

n on

hou

sing

and

grow

th is

sues

, in

part

icul

ar, i

s ne

eded

.

Reta

in, w

ith e

xpan

sion

and

re-fo

cus

of o

bjec

tives

.

2.2.

6A. T

arge

ting

Gro

wth

in

Com

mun

ity P

lan

Are

as

“Ide

ntify

targ

eted

gro

wth

ar

eas

and

inco

rpor

ate

appr

opria

te la

nd u

se

desig

natio

ns in

16

Com

mun

ity P

lans

Iden

tify

targ

ets

in a

ll Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns”

Each

of t

he n

ew C

omm

unity

Pla

ns a

lread

y ad

opte

d (1

) or

nea

r ado

ptio

n (5

) inc

lude

s ta

rget

ed g

row

th a

reas

and

in

corp

orat

e ap

prop

riate

land

use

des

igna

tions

.

Com

mun

ity P

lans

hav

e ef

fect

ivel

y di

rect

ed

grow

th to

mee

t the

obj

ectiv

e; h

owev

er n

o ex

plic

it ho

usin

g ta

rget

s w

ere

incl

uded

in n

ew

Com

mun

ity P

lans

. Thi

s pr

ogra

m o

bjec

tive

over

laps

with

cur

rent

pro

gram

Com

mun

ity

Plan

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g Ta

rget

s).

Reta

in, w

ith a

dded

lang

uage

on

need

to tr

y to

pro

tect

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g an

d m

ixed

-us

e/hi

gh-d

ensi

ty h

ousin

g ne

ar tr

ansi

t fro

m

addi

tiona

l fee

s, s

ince

thes

e ca

tego

ries

are

cons

ider

ed e

xem

pt fr

om C

onge

stio

n M

anag

emen

t Pro

gram

cal

cula

tions

.

2.2.

6B. H

ousin

g El

emen

t Re

latio

nshi

p to

Lan

d U

se E

ntitl

emen

t and

Lo

ng-R

ange

Pla

nnin

g

Repo

rt to

City

Pla

nnin

g Co

mm

issio

nTh

ere

has

been

no

activ

ity in

mak

ing

thes

e ty

pes

of re

port

s to

the

City

Pla

nnin

g Co

mm

issio

n.N

ot e

ffect

ive.

Allo

w C

ity P

lann

ing

Com

mis

sion

to

deci

de w

heth

er th

ey w

ant t

o re

ceiv

e th

ese

repo

rts

in th

e fu

ture

.

2.3.

1A. P

riorit

y Pl

an C

heck

an

d Ex

pedi

ted

Perm

ittin

g fo

r Gre

en B

uild

ing

Proj

ects

Redu

ce p

lan

chec

k an

d pe

rmit

proc

ess

time

for a

ny L

EED

-Silv

er

resid

entia

l pro

ject

s

LEED

Silv

er P

roje

cts

had

rece

ived

exp

edite

d pe

rmit

proc

essin

g un

til th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e LA

Gre

en

Build

ing

Code

(i.e

. Cal

Gre

en) i

n Ja

nuar

y 20

11.

Effe

ctiv

e un

til th

e G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de

effe

ctiv

ely

ende

d th

e pr

ogra

m.

Rem

ove

as p

riorit

y no

long

er e

xist

s.

2.3.

1B. E

ntitl

emen

t Ca

se M

anag

emen

t and

Ex

pedi

ting

for G

reen

Bu

ildin

g Pr

ojec

ts

Redu

ce e

ntitl

emen

t pr

oces

sing

time

for

100

LEED

-Silv

er

resid

entia

l pro

ject

s

LEED

Silv

er P

roje

cts

had

rece

ived

exp

edite

d en

title

men

t pro

cess

ing

until

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

LA G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de (i

e. C

al

Gre

en) i

n Ja

nuar

y 20

11. A

ppro

xim

atel

y 30

pro

ject

s re

ceiv

ed e

xped

ited

entit

lem

ent p

roce

ssin

g un

til th

en. N

ow T

ier 1

or 2

pro

ject

s (b

eyon

d m

anda

tory

) are

elig

ible

for e

xped

ited

entit

lem

ent c

ase

proc

essin

g.

Effe

ctiv

e w

hile

pro

gram

was

ope

ratin

g. F

ew, i

f an

y pr

ojec

ts h

ave

opte

d to

take

adv

anta

ge o

f th

e hi

gher

Tie

r 1 a

nd 2

sta

ndar

ds, s

ince

then

.

Cont

inue

with

new

LA

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Code

requ

irem

ents

for e

xped

ited

proc

essin

g. E

xplo

re w

ays

to im

prov

e in

cent

ives

to b

uild

gre

ener

.

Page 46: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-46 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.3.

1C. S

usta

inab

le

Prac

tices

: Gre

en T

eam

“Est

ablis

h G

reen

Tea

m

Esta

blish

and

mai

ntai

n St

anda

rd o

f Sus

tain

abili

ty

Esta

blish

and

mai

ntai

n St

anda

rd o

f Exc

elle

nce

Deve

lop

and

impl

emen

t or

dina

nces

as

nece

ssar

y”

Gre

en T

eam

mee

tings

had

bee

n pr

ior t

o th

e ad

optio

n of

the

LA G

reen

Bu

ildin

g Co

de, w

hen

the

need

was

less

ened

. In

2011

, the

Gre

en T

eam

w

as e

ffect

ivel

y di

scon

tinue

d. A

new

Gre

en D

ivisi

on w

as im

plem

ente

d in

LA

DBS

in 2

011

resp

onsib

le fo

r che

ckin

g G

reen

Cod

e co

mpl

ianc

e.

Gre

en T

eam

was

effe

ctiv

e bu

t no

long

er e

xist

s.Re

mov

e.

2.3.

1D. R

educ

e Im

pedi

men

ts to

In

nova

tive

Desig

n

Impr

oved

and

str

eam

lined

pr

oced

ures

A do

wnt

own

Perm

anen

t Sup

port

ive

Hous

ing

proj

ect t

hat s

eeks

to

empl

oy 1

02 p

re-fa

bric

ated

sta

cked

apa

rtm

ent u

nits

was

per

mitt

ed

in 2

011.

Rob

otic

par

king

str

uctu

res

are

bein

g ap

prov

ed.

Diffi

cult

to m

easu

re s

ucce

ss o

f thi

s pr

ogra

m.

Rem

ove

as p

rogr

am la

cks

spec

ific

obje

ctiv

es o

r a d

efine

d w

ork

prog

ram

.

2.3.

2A. F

inan

cial

In

cent

ives

to

Cons

erve

Wat

er

Inst

alla

tion

of h

igh

effic

ienc

y cl

othe

s w

ashe

rs in

5,0

00

hous

ehol

ds p

er y

ear

Prog

ram

con

tinue

s w

ith a

tota

l of 1

0,94

4 re

siden

tial w

ashe

rs

reba

ted

to L

ADW

P cu

stom

ers

from

200

8 to

201

0.

Prog

ram

has

sig

nific

antly

exc

eede

d its

obj

ectiv

es.

Reta

in.

2.3.

2B. M

anag

e W

ater

Res

ourc

es

“Ado

pt c

hang

es in

pr

oced

ures

as

need

ed to

al

low

sto

rmw

ater

reus

e

Faci

litat

e in

tegr

atio

n of

sto

rmw

ater

cap

ture

in

to s

ite p

lan

revi

ew”

The

Low

-Impa

ct D

evel

opm

ent (

LID)

Ord

inan

ce, w

hich

effe

ctiv

ely

repl

aced

the

prev

ious

sto

rmw

ater

col

lect

ion

and

miti

gatio

ns p

rogr

am,

beca

me

effe

ctiv

e an

d ap

plic

able

to m

ost r

elev

ant p

roje

cts

in 2

012.

Effe

ctiv

e at

mee

ting

goal

s th

roug

h a

stor

mw

ater

ord

inan

ce.

Com

bine

with

Sto

rmw

ater

Col

lect

ion

and

Miti

gatio

n an

d G

reen

Str

eets

.

2.3.

3A. I

ncen

tives

to

Cons

erve

Ene

rgy

“50,

000

low

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds o

btai

n m

ore

ener

gy-e

ffici

ent

refri

gera

tors

2,00

0 ho

useh

old

retir

e no

n-en

ergy

effi

cien

t re

frige

rato

rs a

nnua

lly”

“LA

DWP

repo

rts

the

follo

win

g:

$7.2

M in

ince

ntiv

es/

reba

tes

betw

een

2006

an

d 20

12, t

o ro

ughl

y 14

,500

cus

tom

ers;

80,1

90 R

efrig

erat

ors

exch

ange

d sin

ce p

rogr

am

ince

ptio

n in

200

7:

34,5

44 R

efrig

erat

ors

recy

cled

sin

ce

prog

ram

ince

ptio

n, a

s w

ella

s ap

prox

imat

ely

2,00

0 fre

ezer

s.”

Prog

ram

has

sig

nific

antly

ex

ceed

ed it

s ob

ject

ives

.Re

tain

Page 47: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-47

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.3.

3B. L

oans

for E

nerg

y Co

nser

vatio

n in

Affo

rdab

le

Hous

ing

Deve

lopm

ent

2,90

0 af

ford

able

hou

sing

units

with

ene

rgy

effic

ient

sys

tem

s

“App

roxi

mat

ely

thre

e to

six

gra

nts

a ye

ar w

ere

issu

ed b

y LA

DWP

to fu

nd e

nerg

y co

nser

vatio

n in

affo

rdab

le h

ousin

g de

velo

pmen

ts s

ince

200

6 (a

ppro

xiam

tely

$1

mill

ion/

year

).

The

prog

ram

was

dis

cont

inue

d in

201

2 w

hen

the

initi

al

$10

mill

ion

LADW

P al

loca

tion

was

spe

nt. “

Prog

ram

met

its

obje

ctiv

es b

efor

e ru

nnin

g ou

t of f

undi

ng.

Rem

ove

2.3.

3C. E

ncou

rage

En

ergy

Con

serv

atio

n th

roug

h Pr

icin

g

10,0

00 re

siden

tial

cust

omer

s on

the

Tim

e of

Use

(TO

U) r

ate

The

aver

age

mon

thly

ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

per s

ingl

e fa

mily

re

duce

d fro

m 5

14 k

Wh/

mon

th in

200

8 to

477

kW

h/m

onth

in

2011

. Res

iden

tial c

usto

mer

s w

hose

mon

thly

ene

rgy

use

exce

eds

3,00

0 kW

h ar

e no

w re

quire

d to

use

TO

U pr

icin

g (e

ncou

rage

s en

ergy

con

serv

atio

n &

can

help

low

er a

cus

tom

er’s

bill)

. Nea

rly

10,0

00 re

siden

tial c

usto

mer

s on

the

TOU

rate

as

of e

nd o

f 201

1.

Prog

ram

met

its

obje

ctiv

es.

Reta

in

2.3.

3D. G

reen

Pow

er

for a

Gre

en L

A

25,0

00 h

ouse

hold

s ch

oosin

g al

tern

ativ

e en

ergy

sou

rces

The

LADW

P re

port

ed a

tota

l of 1

7,04

5 G

reen

Po

wer

Cus

tom

ers

at th

e en

d of

201

1.Pr

ogra

m h

as n

ot fu

lly m

et it

s ob

ject

ives

of 2

5,00

0 ho

useh

olds

. Re

tain

with

gre

ater

em

phas

is on

pu

blic

izin

g th

e pr

ogra

m.

2.3.

3E. M

illio

n Tr

ees

LA –

Priv

ate

Prop

erty

700,

000

shad

e tr

ees

plan

ted

city

wid

e

“Sin

ce th

e pr

ogra

m la

unch

in S

epte

mbe

r of 2

006,

M

illio

n Tr

ees

LA (M

TLA)

has

pla

nted

ove

r 330

,000

tree

s in

crea

sing

the

over

all n

ew tr

ee p

lant

ing

rate

by a

s m

uch

as 6

fold

. Prio

r to

the

MTL

A pr

ogra

m, t

he

City

, non

-pro

fits

and

new

dev

elop

men

ts w

as p

lant

ing

appr

oxim

atel

y 10

,000

ann

ually

(bas

ed o

n

City

’s U

rban

For

estr

y Di

visio

n in

form

atio

n).”

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e.Co

mbi

ne w

ith o

ther

Mill

ion

Tree

s LA

pro

gram

.

2.3.

3F. B

uild

ing

Desig

n fo

r Ene

rgy

Effic

ienc

y

“Gui

delin

es d

evel

oped

an

d up

date

d

Inte

grat

e gu

idel

ines

into

al

l pro

ject

revi

ews”

“Gui

delin

es re

gard

ing

ener

gy e

ffici

ency

in re

siden

tial

build

ings

wer

e in

tegr

ated

into

pro

ject

revi

ews

thro

ugh

the

intr

oduc

tion

of th

e LA

Gre

en

Build

ing

Code

on

Janu

ary

1, 2

011

(the

adop

tion

of C

ALG

reen

). In

an

effo

rt to

exp

edite

the

stre

ngth

enin

g of

wat

er a

nd

ener

gy e

ffici

ency

requ

irem

ents

, LA

DWP

esta

blish

ed a

Co

des

and

Stan

dard

s Pr

ogra

m to

add

ress

wat

er a

nd

ener

gy c

onse

rvat

ion

and

sust

aina

bilit

y th

roug

h di

rect

in

volv

emen

t with

the

code

set

ting

bodi

es.

Gui

delin

es c

ontin

ued

to b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e on

-lin

e at

ww

w.e

nviro

nmen

tla.o

rg.”

Requ

irem

ents

for g

reat

er e

nerg

y ef

ficie

ncy

in m

ajor

resid

entia

l pro

ject

s ha

ve g

one

into

effe

ct, m

eetin

g th

e ob

ject

ive.

Reta

in b

ut e

xpan

d bu

ildin

g de

sign

prog

ram

bey

ond

ener

gy e

ffici

ency

, to

incl

ude

air a

nd w

ater

qua

lity.

2.3.

3G. B

uild

ing

Desig

n fo

r Im

prov

ed A

ir Q

ualit

y

“Gui

delin

es d

evel

oped

an

d up

date

d

Inte

grat

e gu

idel

ines

into

al

l pro

ject

revi

ews”

“LEE

D gu

idel

ines

rega

rdin

g in

door

air

qual

ity in

resid

entia

l bui

ldin

gs

wer

e in

tegr

ated

into

pro

ject

revi

ews.

LA

DBS

impl

emen

ts th

e im

prov

ed a

ir qu

ality

sta

ndar

ds fo

und

in th

e ne

w G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de.

Gui

delin

es c

ontin

ued

to b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e on

-line

at

ww

w.e

nviro

nmen

tla.o

rg.”

Requ

irem

ents

for g

reat

er a

ir qu

ality

in

maj

or re

siden

tial p

roje

cts

have

gon

e in

to e

ffect

, mee

ting

the

obje

ctiv

e.

Mer

ge w

ith B

uild

ing

Desig

n fo

r Su

stai

nabi

lity

prog

ram

(was

Bui

ldin

g De

sign

for E

nerg

y Ef

ficie

ncy)

.

2.3.

3H. L

oans

for

Cons

erva

tion

700

loan

s to

hou

seho

lds

for i

nsta

lling

sol

ar s

yste

ms

LADW

P di

d no

t pro

vide

loan

s fo

r sol

ar s

yste

ms.

N

ot e

ffect

ive,

how

ever

ther

e do

es n

ot a

ppea

r to

be a

pre

ssin

g ne

ed fo

r City

-pro

vide

d lo

ans

as th

e m

arke

t has

ple

nty

of s

olar

pro

vide

rs d

oing

that

.Re

mov

e

Page 48: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-48 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.3.

3I. I

ncen

tives

to

Enco

urag

e G

reen

Bu

ildin

g So

lutio

ns in

Ex

istin

g Bu

ildin

gs

Deve

lop

gree

n bu

ildin

g in

cent

ives

pro

gram

for

exis

ting

build

ings

Sinc

e 20

06 L

ADW

P ha

s de

velo

ped

new

gre

en b

uild

ing

ince

ntiv

es

for e

xist

ing

resid

entia

l bui

ldin

gs. T

he re

siden

tial i

ncen

tives

incl

ude

cool

roof

, who

le h

ouse

fan

and

who

le h

ouse

retr

ofit b

onus

reba

tes.

LADW

P ha

s be

en e

ffect

ive

at

deve

lopi

ng g

reen

bui

ldin

g in

cent

ives

fo

r exi

stin

g re

siden

tial b

uild

ings

. Re

tain

2.3.

4A. R

ecyc

le

Cons

truc

tion

Was

te

“Est

ablis

h in

cent

ive

prog

ram

for s

ourc

e se

para

tion

of c

onst

uctio

n an

d de

mol

ition

was

te

Esta

blish

reba

te p

rogr

am

for c

onst

ruct

ion

and

dem

oliti

on w

aste

take

n to

a C

ity-c

ertifi

ed

was

te p

roce

ssor

Adop

t ord

inan

ce to

re

quire

con

stru

ctio

n an

d de

mol

ition

was

te to

be

take

n to

a C

ity-c

ertifi

ed

was

te p

roce

ssor

The

City

wid

e Co

nstr

uctio

n an

d De

mol

ition

(C&

D) W

aste

Rec

yclin

g O

rdin

ance

bec

ame

effe

ctiv

e Ja

nuar

y 20

11. R

equi

res

that

all

mix

ed C

&D

was

te g

ener

ated

with

in C

ity li

mits

be

take

n to

City

ce

rtifi

ed C

&D

was

te p

roce

ssor

s (B

OS

is re

spon

sible

). A

ll ha

uler

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s re

spon

sible

for h

andl

ing

C&D

was

te m

ust

obta

in a

Priv

ate

Solid

Was

te H

aule

r Per

mit

from

BO

S pr

ior t

o co

llect

ing,

hau

ling

and

tran

spor

ting

C&D

was

te a

nd C

&D

was

te

can

only

be

take

n to

City

cer

tified

C&

D pr

oces

sing

faci

litie

s.

Prog

ram

met

its

obje

ctiv

es.

Reta

in.

2.3.

4B. S

usta

inab

le

Build

ing

Mat

eria

ls

“Iss

ue a

nd m

aint

ain

guid

elin

es

Inte

grat

e gu

idel

ines

into

pr

ojec

t rev

iew

pro

cess

“The

LA

DBS

and

LADW

P im

plem

ents

the

sust

aina

ble

build

ing

mat

eria

ls re

quire

men

ts o

f the

new

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Code

(effe

ctiv

e Ja

nuar

y 1,

201

1). G

uide

lines

rega

rdin

g su

stai

nabl

e bu

ildin

g m

ater

ials

wer

e in

tegr

ated

into

pro

ject

revi

ews.

LA

DBS

crea

ted

a “”

Man

dato

ry R

equi

rem

ents

Che

cklis

t””

for a

dditi

ons

and

alte

ratio

ns

to re

siden

tial b

uild

ings

to a

ssis

t dev

elop

ers

and

owne

rs in

201

1.

In a

dditi

on to

fulfi

lling

the

(new

) man

dato

ry re

quire

men

ts

of th

e Ci

ty’s

LA G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de, D

CP c

ontin

ues

to

enco

urag

e de

velo

pers

to s

eek

the

volu

ntar

y st

anda

rd o

f su

stai

nabl

e ex

celle

nce

and

take

adv

anta

ge o

f the

pro

cedu

ral

ince

ntiv

es (p

riorit

y pr

oces

sing

of d

iscr

etio

nary

cas

es) a

fford

ed

at th

e LE

ED S

ilver

, or h

ighe

r, U

SGBC

cer

tifica

tion

ratin

g.”

Requ

irem

ents

for t

he u

se o

f mor

e su

stai

nabl

e bu

ildin

g m

ater

ials

in m

ajor

resid

entia

l pro

ject

s ha

ve g

one

into

effe

ct, m

eetin

g th

e ob

ject

ive.

Reta

in, h

owev

er in

clud

e su

stai

nabl

e bu

ildin

g pr

actic

es in

this

prog

ram

as

wel

l.

2.3.

4C. R

ecyc

ling

Colle

ctio

n in

Res

iden

tial

Deve

lopm

ent

Prov

ide

on-s

ite re

cycl

ing

bins

and

wee

kly

pick

-up

for a

ll re

siden

tial

deve

lopm

ents

“The

City

of L

os A

ngel

es c

olle

cts

a va

riety

of r

ecyc

labl

es

from

ove

r 750

,000

hou

seho

lds

ever

y w

eek.

AB3

41 re

quire

s m

anda

tory

com

mer

cial

recy

clin

g in

Ca

lifor

nia

begi

nnin

g Ju

ly 1

, 201

2. M

ulti-

fam

ily d

wel

lings

of

5 u

nits

or m

ore

will

be

requ

ired

to re

cycl

e.”

Mee

ting

obje

ctiv

es.

Reta

in.

Page 49: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-49

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.3.

5A. I

nfor

mat

ion

and

Refe

rral

and

Tec

hnic

al

Ass

ista

nce

Rega

rdin

g Su

stai

nabl

e Pr

actic

es

“Dev

elop

and

mai

ntai

n an

out

reac

h w

ebsi

te

1,00

0 re

siden

tial

deve

lopm

ent s

take

hold

ers

(arc

hite

cts,

eng

inee

rs,

deve

lope

rs, g

ener

al

cont

ract

ors,

and

oth

ers)

tr

aine

d in

sus

tain

able

pr

actic

es a

nnua

lly

Prod

uce

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Repo

rt C

ard

annu

ally

“The

LA

DWP

web

site

(LA

DWP.

com

) now

incl

udes

tip

s pa

ges

for c

onse

rvat

ion,

wat

er e

ffici

ent

land

scap

e sy

stem

s an

d ca

lcul

ator

s fo

r ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion.

Info

rmat

ion

is pr

ovid

ed fo

r the

Sol

ar In

cent

ive

Prog

ram

, Fee

d-In

Tar

iff, a

nd e

lect

ric v

ehic

les.

The

LA

DWP

web

site

has

bee

n up

date

d to

pro

vide

info

rmat

ion

rega

rdin

g th

e G

reen

Bui

ldin

g In

itiat

ives

. Inf

orm

atio

n is

prov

ided

rega

rdin

g th

e tr

ansi

tion

from

LEE

D to

the

new

sta

te g

reen

cod

e (C

ALG

reen

) an

d th

e LA

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Code

. The

Cal

Gre

en T

ips

page

s ar

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r bot

h co

mm

erci

al a

nd re

siden

tial c

onst

ruct

ions

type

s w

ith d

etai

led

info

rmat

ion

rega

rdin

g, p

lum

bing

, mec

hani

cal a

nd

elec

tric

al c

ode

requ

irem

ents

for c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith th

e bu

ildin

g co

des,

gre

en c

odes

and

the

Wat

er E

ffici

ency

Ord

inan

ce. D

etai

led

info

rmat

ion

is pr

ovid

ed fo

r res

iden

tial g

rayw

ater

col

lect

ion

and

reus

e sy

stem

s no

w re

cogn

ized

by

the

code

. Web

site

link

s ar

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r the

gre

en b

uild

ing

requ

irem

ents

, gra

ywat

er, a

s w

ell

as li

nks

pert

aini

ng to

oth

er T

echn

ical

Ass

ista

nce

Prog

ram

s.”

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e. O

utre

ach

web

site

s w

ere

mai

ntai

ned,

alth

ough

it is

diffi

cult

to k

now

w

heth

er th

e go

al o

f tra

inin

g of

1,0

00 re

siden

tial

deve

lopm

ent s

take

hold

ers

in s

usta

inab

le

prac

tices

ann

ually

occ

urre

d th

roug

h si

te. A

Gre

en

Build

ing

Repo

rt C

ard

was

nev

er p

rodu

ced.

Mer

ge w

ith S

usta

inab

le B

uild

ing

Prac

tices

. Refl

ect a

dopt

ion

of

LA G

reen

Bui

ldin

g Co

de.

2.3.

5B. S

usta

inab

le

Prac

tices

Dem

onst

ratio

n Pr

ojec

ts

One

mul

ti-fa

mily

de

mon

stra

tion

proj

ect a

nd fi

ve s

ingl

e fa

mily

dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts a

nnua

ly

Prog

ram

rem

aine

d on

hol

d th

roug

hout

the

plan

ning

per

iod.

Not

effe

ctiv

e. D

isso

lutio

n of

CRA

/LA

has

end

ed th

is pr

ogra

m.

Rem

ove.

2.4.

1A. N

eigh

borh

ood

Stab

iliza

tion

Prog

ram

“6 re

siden

tial

neig

hbor

hood

s se

rved

by

prog

ram

Adop

tion

of n

ew

Com

mun

ity P

lans

“Pro

gres

s of

CRA

/LA

com

pone

nt u

nabl

e to

be

obta

ined

to

dis

solu

tion

of R

edev

elop

men

t Age

ncie

s.

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns in

dev

elop

men

t, w

hich

incl

ude

land

use

an

d ur

ban

desig

n ch

apte

rs to

hel

p pr

otec

t nei

ghbo

rhoo

d ch

arac

ter.

Plan

s al

so in

clud

e po

licie

s to

enc

oura

ge a

nd

ince

ntiv

ize

incr

ease

d su

ppor

t and

bet

ter s

ervi

ces

(suc

h as

he

alth

y fo

od s

tore

s an

d pa

rks)

in u

nder

serv

ed a

reas

. “

The

prog

ram

has

effe

ctiv

ely

ende

d w

ith

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

ARe

mov

e

2.4.

1B. S

ervi

ces

in

Publ

ic H

ousin

g

“50

resid

entia

l clie

nts

serv

ed b

y ed

ucat

iona

l as

sista

nce

prog

ram

s

100

resid

entia

l clie

nts

serv

ed b

y co

mpu

ter

trai

ning

pro

gram

s

100

yout

h se

rved

by

recr

eatio

nal,

educ

atio

nal

and

cultu

ral p

rogr

ams

1,60

0 re

siden

tial

clie

nts

serv

ed b

y ca

reer

as

sista

nce

prog

ram

s”

“Thr

ough

the

wor

k of

the

Resid

ent S

ervi

ces

Sect

ion,

the

HAC

LA

cont

inue

s to

pro

vide

resid

ents

with

a v

arie

ty o

f pro

gram

s an

d su

ppor

t ser

vice

s to

pro

mot

e se

lf-su

ffici

ency

. Pro

gram

s an

d se

rvic

es o

ffere

d to

resid

ents

incl

ude:

job

read

ines

s; jo

b tr

aini

ng, G

ED c

ompl

etio

n, c

ompu

ter l

itera

cy, f

amily

cou

nsel

ing,

af

ter-s

choo

l pro

gram

s, a

nd h

ealth

ser

vice

s. 3

0,00

0 re

peat

cu

stom

ers

rece

ived

em

ploy

men

t, co

mpu

ter o

r edu

catio

nal

serv

ices

. HAC

LA s

ucce

ssfu

lly e

nrol

led

and

plac

ed 4

99

clie

nts

for t

he S

outh

Bay

Wor

kfor

ce in

vest

men

t Boa

rd (S

BWIB

) Tr

ansi

tiona

l Sub

sidiz

ed E

mpl

oym

ent P

rogr

am (T

SE).

The

Hous

ing

Auth

ority

rees

tabl

ished

the

Kids

Pro

gres

s In

c. (K

PI) t

o ra

ise

fund

s to

dev

elop

and

impl

emen

t pro

gram

s an

d se

rvic

es to

hel

p pu

blic

hou

sing

resid

ents

. The

Hou

sing

Auth

ority

is im

plem

entin

g a

com

preh

ensi

ve H

uman

Cap

ital D

evel

opm

ent i

nitia

tive

at

Jord

an D

owns

, als

o kn

own

as “

Fam

ily F

irst I

nitia

tive”

. “

Effe

ctiv

e. T

he H

ousin

g Au

thor

ity w

ill c

ontin

ue

to e

xpan

d su

ch s

ervi

ces

pend

ing

the

avai

labi

lity

of fi

nanc

ial r

esou

rces

and

phy

sical

spa

ce.

Reta

in

Page 50: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-50 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.4.

2A. I

mpr

oved

Str

eet

Stan

dard

s, S

tree

tsca

pes

and

Land

scap

ing

Adop

t new

str

eet

stan

dard

s

City

con

tinue

s to

ado

pt n

ew s

tree

t sta

ndar

ds th

at p

rovi

de a

n en

hanc

ed b

alan

ce b

etw

een

traf

fic fl

ow a

nd o

ther

impo

rtan

t st

reet

func

tions

incl

udin

g tr

ansi

t rou

tes,

ped

estr

ian

envi

ronm

ents

, bi

cycl

e ro

utes

, bui

ldin

g de

sign,

etc

. New

sta

ndar

ds h

ave

been

ado

pted

in D

ownt

own

and

Holly

woo

d, a

nd a

re p

endi

ng

in s

ever

al C

omm

unity

Pla

ns c

urre

ntly

bei

ng u

pdat

ed.

The

prog

ram

has

bee

n su

cces

sful

in

mee

ting

its o

bjec

tive.

Rem

ove

as p

rogr

am d

oes

not d

irect

ly

rela

te to

spe

cific

hou

sing

obje

ctiv

es.

2.4.

2B. I

mpr

oved

Q

ualit

y of

Bic

ycle

and

Pe

dest

rian

Path

s

“Ado

pt p

olic

ies

in B

icyc

le

Plan

, Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Elem

ent a

nd C

omm

unity

Pl

ans

that

pro

mot

e pe

dest

rian

and

bicy

cle

tran

sit l

inka

ges

10 b

icyc

le ro

ute

segm

ents

co

nstr

ucte

d/im

prov

ed

100

pede

stria

n pa

ths

impr

oved

“The

City

’s 20

10 B

icyc

le P

lan

was

ado

pted

by

City

Cou

ncil

in

Mar

ch 2

011,

with

mor

e th

an 1

20 m

iles

of b

ike

faci

litie

s in

stal

led

since

ado

ptio

n. In

add

ition

to th

e Pl

an, a

Fiv

e-Ye

ar Im

plem

enta

tion

Stra

tegy

and

Tec

hnic

al H

andb

ook

was

ado

pted

at t

hat t

ime

as w

ell.

Furt

herm

ore,

qua

rter

ly re

port

s on

the

Plan

hav

e be

en p

ublis

hed

since

ado

ptio

n. P

hase

I of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n pl

an h

as b

egun

th

e pr

oces

s fo

r app

rova

l in

2012

-201

3. K

ey re

com

men

datio

ns

of th

e pl

an h

ave

also

bee

n im

plem

ente

d in

clud

ing

crea

tion

of a

Bik

e Pl

an T

rust

Fun

d an

d in

stal

latio

n of

bik

e co

rral

s.

The

City

’s W

alka

bilit

y Ch

eckl

ist,

adop

ted

in 2

008,

co

ntin

ued

to b

e us

ed fo

r enc

oura

ging

ped

estr

ian-

orie

ntat

ion

in n

ew d

iscr

etio

nary

pro

ject

s.

The

City

’s M

obili

ty E

lem

ent h

as b

een

proc

eedi

ng s

ince

20

10. I

t is

proj

ecte

d to

be

appr

oved

in 2

014.

Sign

ifica

nt p

rogr

ess

has

been

mad

e in

impr

ove

the

City

’s bi

cycl

e an

d pe

dest

rian

path

s.

Prog

ram

has

met

its

prim

ary

obje

ctiv

es.

Rem

ove,

as

obje

ctiv

es a

re n

ot

dire

ctly

rela

ted

to h

ousin

g.

2.4.

2C. U

rban

De

sign

Stan

dard

s

Adop

t urb

an d

esig

n st

anda

rds

in 1

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns

“City

wid

e De

sign

Gui

delin

es fo

r all

proj

ects

wer

e co

mpl

eted

in

2011

, inc

ludi

ng s

peci

fic g

uide

lines

for m

ulti-

fam

ily d

evel

opm

ent,

com

mer

cial

dev

elop

men

t and

indu

stria

l dev

elop

men

t. A

n O

rdin

ance

to

impl

emen

t req

uire

d Fi

ndin

gs u

tiliz

ing

the

Gui

delin

es a

s pa

rt

of d

iscr

etio

nary

act

ions

is b

efor

e th

e Ci

ty C

ounc

il in

201

3.

In a

dditi

on, 6

Com

mun

ity P

lans

are

in d

evel

opm

ent,

whi

ch e

ach

incl

ude

a La

nd U

se a

nd U

rban

Des

ign

chap

ter,

whi

ch w

ill h

elp

addr

ess

spec

ific

desig

n co

ncer

ns fo

r res

iden

tial d

evel

opm

ent.”

Prog

ram

has

exc

eede

d ob

ject

ives

by

putt

ing

City

wid

e De

sign

Gui

delin

es in

to p

lace

.Re

mov

e, a

s pr

ogra

m h

as m

et it

s ob

ject

ives

.

2.4.

2D. B

icyc

le F

acili

ties

“Est

ablis

h gu

idel

ines

and

de

velo

pmen

t sta

ndar

ds

40 b

icyc

le fa

cilit

ies

deve

lope

d in

resid

entia

l pr

ojec

ts a

nnua

lly”

“On

Sept

embe

r 30,

201

1, th

e Ci

ty C

ounc

il ap

prov

ed

DCP’

s pr

opos

ed o

rdin

ance

to e

xpan

d bi

cycl

e pa

rkin

g re

quire

men

ts th

roug

hout

the

City

. The

actio

ns w

ill e

xpan

d bi

cycl

e pa

rkin

g re

quire

men

ts

to c

over

mul

ti-fa

mily

resid

entia

l dev

elop

men

ts w

ith

mor

e th

an th

ree

units

or m

ore

than

five

gue

st

room

s; in

clud

e co

mm

erci

al, i

ndus

tria

l, an

d m

anuf

actu

ring

uses

of

less

than

10,

000

squa

re fe

et; i

ncre

ase

the

leve

ls of

bic

ycle

par

king

re

quire

d un

der t

he c

urre

nt c

ode

for c

omm

erci

al, i

nstit

utio

nal,

and

indu

stria

l pro

ject

s; d

efine

acc

epta

ble

loca

tions

for b

icyc

le

park

ing;

requ

ire th

at b

oth

shor

t-ter

m a

nd lo

ng-t

erm

bic

ycle

pa

rkin

g be

pro

vide

d; im

prov

e de

sign

stan

dard

s; a

men

d th

e am

ount

of b

icyc

le p

arki

ng th

at m

ay b

e su

bstit

uted

for a

utom

obile

pa

rkin

g, a

nd p

rovi

de ru

les

for t

he in

stal

latio

n of

bic

ycle

par

king

w

ithin

the

publ

ic ri

ght-

of-w

ay b

y pr

ivat

e bu

sines

ses.”

Prog

ram

has

met

its

obje

ctiv

es o

f est

ablis

hing

gu

idel

ines

and

dev

elop

men

t sta

ndar

ds fo

r bic

ycle

fa

cilit

ies

deve

lope

d in

resid

entia

l pro

ject

s.Re

mov

e, a

s pr

ogra

m h

as m

et it

s ob

ject

ives

.

2.4.

3A. R

espo

nse

to D

evel

opm

ent

Opp

ortu

nitie

s

20 d

evel

oper

s an

d pr

oper

ty o

wne

rs

prov

ided

with

tech

nica

l as

sista

nce

annu

ally

CRA

/LA

outr

each

is u

nkno

wn

due

to th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

Rede

velo

pmen

t Age

ncie

s.

Ove

rall

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

the

prog

ram

is

not a

ble

to b

e de

term

ined

due

to

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

A.

Rem

ove.

Page 51: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-51

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.4.

3B. P

lann

ing

for

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds

“16

upda

ted

Com

mun

ity P

lans

Impl

emen

tatio

n to

ols

as a

ppro

pria

te”

6 Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns in

dev

elop

men

t, w

ith o

ne P

lan

(Hol

lyw

ood)

ad

opte

d in

201

2. N

ew C

omm

unity

Pla

ns fo

r Wes

t Ada

ms-

Bald

win

Hi

lls-L

eim

ert P

ark,

Sou

th L

A, S

outh

east

LA

, San

Ped

ro, G

rana

da

Hills

and

Syl

mar

are

in a

n ad

vanc

ed p

hase

of d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

plan

to b

e in

trod

uced

in 2

013.

The

Pla

ns w

ill in

clud

e he

ight

ened

im

plem

enta

tion

mea

sure

s fo

r urb

an d

esig

n an

d la

nd u

se th

roug

h th

e us

e of

a n

ew to

ol d

evel

oped

dur

ing

the

plan

ning

per

iod,

cal

led

a Co

mm

unity

Pla

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Ove

rlay

dist

rict (

CPIO

).

Effe

ctiv

e at

intr

oduc

ing

impl

emen

tatio

n to

ols

into

com

mun

ity p

lann

ing

proc

ess.

Reta

in, b

ut re

nam

e to

refle

ct fo

cus

of th

is pr

ogra

m o

n pr

omot

ing

neig

hbor

hood

cha

ract

er.

2.4.

3C. C

omm

unity

and

N

eigh

borh

ood

Coun

cil

Deve

lopm

ent R

evie

w

“Dup

licat

e ca

se fi

les

prov

ided

to C

NCs

for

prop

osed

pro

ject

s

Not

ifica

tions

to C

NCs

for

filed

app

licat

ions

bi-w

eekl

y

Case

filin

g ac

tivity

pos

ted

on D

CP w

ebsi

te b

i-wee

kly

Case

act

ivity

map

s po

sted

on

DCP

web

site

qua

rter

ly”

DCP

cont

inue

d bi

-wee

kly

web

pos

ting

and

emai

ling

of c

ases

fil

ed b

y N

eigh

borh

ood

Coun

cil a

nd C

omm

unity

Pla

n ar

eas.

DCP

co

ntin

ued

to p

rovi

de d

uplic

ate

copi

es o

f cas

es fi

led

to C

NCs

. In

2011

DCP

intr

oduc

ed a

new

“N

eigh

borh

ood

Liaa

son”

pos

ition

, w

hich

is m

eant

to b

e th

e po

int o

f con

tact

for c

omm

unity

and

ne

ighb

orho

od g

roup

s se

ekin

g m

ore

info

rmat

ion

abou

t pla

nnin

g pr

oces

ses

or p

endi

ng p

lans

and

pro

ject

s. 2

011

also

saw

the

begi

nnin

g of

DCP

’s ne

w P

ublic

Par

ticip

atio

n Po

licy,

whi

ch

incr

ease

d to

60

days

the

time

the

publ

ic h

as to

revi

ew p

relim

inar

y re

port

s be

fore

the

City

Pla

nnin

g Co

mm

issio

n (C

PC) m

eets

.

Effe

ctiv

e at

pro

vidi

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties

for c

omm

unity

and

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Co

unci

ls to

pro

vide

thei

r inp

ut. N

o ca

se a

ctiv

ity m

aps

wer

e cr

eate

d.

Reta

in

2.4.

3D. S

urve

yLA

– Th

e Lo

s A

ngel

es H

isto

ric

Reso

urce

s Su

rvey

“Com

plet

e ci

tyw

ide

surv

ey

Publ

ish re

sults

“Sur

veyL

A fie

ld s

urve

ys a

re b

eing

con

duct

ed o

ver a

mul

ti-ye

ar p

erio

d by

Com

mun

ity P

lan

Are

a (C

PA).

As

each

are

a is

com

plet

ed, t

he re

sults

are

com

pile

d in

repo

rt fo

rmat

and

po

sted

on

this

web

pag

e by

CPA

nam

e. A

s of

May

1, 2

013

the

follo

win

g Su

rvey

s ha

ve b

een

rele

ased

: Can

oga

Park

- W

inne

tka

- Woo

dlan

d Hi

lls -

Wes

t Hill

s, C

entr

al C

ity N

orth

, Enc

ino-

Tarz

ana,

Har

bor G

atew

ay, H

olly

woo

d, N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood-

Valle

y Vi

llage

, Nor

thea

st L

os A

ngel

es R

iver

Rev

italiz

atio

n A

rea,

Palm

s - M

ar V

ista

- De

l Rey

, San

Ped

ro, S

herm

an O

aks

- Stu

dio

City

- To

luca

Lak

e - C

ahue

nga

Pass

, Sou

th L

os A

ngel

es,

Sout

heas

t Los

Ang

eles

, Wes

t Ada

ms

- Bal

dwin

Hill

s - L

eim

ert,

Wes

t Los

Ang

eles

and

Wilm

ingt

on -

Harb

or C

ity.

The

resu

lts a

re p

ublis

hed

on p

roje

ct s

ite: h

ttp:

//pr

eser

vatio

n.la

city

.org

/sur

vey.”

Very

effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh w

ork

cont

inue

s.

Reta

in a

nd u

pdat

e to

refle

ct

post

201

3 w

ork

prog

ram

.

2.4.

3E. A

nti

Man

sioni

zatio

n Re

gula

tions

“Ado

pt a

n or

dina

nce

to

regu

late

new

sin

gle-

fam

ily h

ome

cons

truc

tion

in fl

atla

nd a

reas

Adop

t an

ordi

nanc

e to

re

gula

te n

ew s

ingl

e-fa

mily

hom

e co

nstr

uctio

n in

hlls

ide

area

s”

City

Cou

ncil

adop

ted

the

perm

anen

t Bas

elin

e M

ansio

niza

tion

Ord

inan

ce in

Feb

ruar

y 20

11. T

he O

rdin

ance

is in

tend

ed

to c

urb

the

cons

truc

tion

of h

omes

that

are

exc

essi

vely

la

rge

and

thus

out

-of-s

cale

with

nea

rby

hom

es in

the

City

’s va

rious

sin

gle-

fam

ily re

siden

tial z

ones

.

Effe

ctiv

e, m

et o

bjec

tives

. Re

mov

e, m

et o

bjec

tives

.

2.4.

3F. N

eigh

borh

ood

Pres

erva

tion

– Do

wnz

onin

g

Rezo

ne a

ppro

pria

te a

reas

in

16

Com

mun

ity P

lans

1 Co

mm

unity

Pla

n w

as c

ompl

eted

(Hol

lyw

ood)

and

5 a

re n

ear

adop

tion

as o

f Mar

ch 2

013.

Hol

lyw

ood

prop

osed

som

e ta

rget

ed

dow

nzon

ing

to p

rese

rve

neig

hbor

hood

cha

ract

er. T

he p

ropo

sed

dow

nzon

ing

was

bal

ance

d w

ith u

pzon

ing

in a

reas

with

goo

d tr

ansi

t ac

cess

. The

sam

e ge

nera

l app

roac

h is

bein

g ta

ken

in o

ther

are

as.

Effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh b

eing

beh

ind

sche

dule

. Pro

gram

obj

ectiv

es o

verla

p w

ith s

ever

al o

ther

rela

ted

prog

ram

s.

Reta

in.

Page 52: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-52 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

2.4.

4A. H

omeo

wne

rshi

p Pr

oper

ties

Acqu

isitio

n De

mon

stra

tion

Proj

ect

150

affo

rdab

le u

nits

so

ld to

mod

erat

e in

com

e fa

mili

es

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

2.4.

4B. H

ome

Ow

ners

hip

on L

arge

Lot

s in

Pac

oim

a1

pilo

t pro

ject

in P

acoi

ma

Prog

ress

on

this

prog

ram

is u

ncle

ar d

ue to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

.Ef

fect

iven

ess

is un

know

n, a

nd th

e pr

ogra

m h

as

ende

d w

ith th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

CRA

/LA

Rem

ove.

3.1.

1A. R

easo

nabl

e Ac

com

mod

atio

n

“Tra

in D

CP s

taff

on

proc

essin

g Re

ason

able

Ac

com

mod

atio

n re

ques

ts

Prod

uce

and

diss

emin

ate

mat

eria

ls re

gard

ing

Reas

onab

le

Acco

mm

odat

ion

proc

ess”

DCP

has

proc

esse

d 35

Rea

sona

ble

Acco

mm

odat

ion

requ

ests

in

volv

ing

plan

ning

or z

onin

g is

sues

sin

ce 2

006.

The

re h

as n

ot b

een

muc

h pr

ogre

ss in

pro

duci

ng a

nd d

isse

min

atin

g m

ater

ials

rega

rdin

g th

e pr

oces

s. S

taff

trai

ning

has

take

n pl

ace

in a

n ad

-hoc

bas

is.

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh m

ore

can

be d

one

to p

rom

ote

the

Reas

onab

le A

ccom

mod

atio

n op

tion

and

trai

n st

aff t

o id

entif

y ar

eas

whe

re it

may

app

ly a

nd h

ow to

han

dle

requ

ests

. Obj

ectiv

es re

mai

n re

leva

nt.

Reta

in.

3.1.

1B. A

DA C

ompl

ianc

e O

ffice

r(s)

Reas

onab

le

acco

mm

odat

ion

prov

ided

in

all

appr

opria

te a

nd

cove

red

faci

litie

s an

d pr

ogra

ms

incl

udin

g re

siden

tial s

helte

rs

DO

D w

orke

d w

ith C

ity D

epar

tmen

ts to

ens

ure

reas

onab

le

acco

mm

odat

ion

was

pro

vide

d in

faci

litie

s an

d pr

ogra

ms.

Effe

ctiv

e, h

owev

er p

rogr

am la

cks

spec

ific

obje

ctiv

es a

nd o

verla

ps w

ith o

ther

Re

ason

able

Acc

omm

odat

ion

prog

ram

.

Mer

ge w

ith R

easo

nabl

e Ac

com

mod

atio

n ab

ove.

3.1.

1C. O

ffice

of t

he

City

Att

orne

y Di

sput

e Re

solu

tion

Prog

ram

(DRP

)

Refe

r and

reso

lve

50

hous

ing

disp

utes

rela

tead

to

per

sons

with

dis

abili

ties

DO

D Co

mpu

teriz

ed In

form

atio

n an

d Re

ferr

al C

ente

r pro

vide

d fo

ur d

irect

refe

rral

s to

the

DRP

for l

andl

ord/

tena

nt d

isput

es

in e

ach

of th

e tw

o ye

ars

whe

re d

ata

is av

aila

ble.

The

maj

ority

of

CIC

hou

sing

disp

utes

wer

e re

ferr

ed to

the

Evic

tion

Cent

er

and

Hous

ing

Righ

ts C

ente

r due

to th

e im

med

iate

cris

is w

ith ti

me

rest

rain

ts a

nd h

igh

risk

of h

omel

essn

ess.

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e in

pro

vidi

ng a

foru

m to

se

ttle

hou

sing-

rela

ted

disp

utes

bet

wee

n la

ndlo

rds

and

tena

nts,

or b

etw

een

prop

erty

ow

ners

and

the

City

. How

ever

the

num

ber o

f re

ferr

als

rela

ted

to p

erso

ns w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s ha

s be

en lo

wer

than

exp

ecte

d.

Reta

in

3.1.

1D. C

ityw

ide

Fair

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

“Rec

eive

600

fair

hous

ing

inqu

iries

ann

ually

Reso

lve

480

fair

hous

ing

inve

stig

atio

ns a

nnua

lly

Cond

uct 6

7 fa

ir ho

usin

g tr

aini

ng s

essio

ns a

nnua

lly

Trai

n 35

new

fair

hous

ing

test

ers

annu

ally

Ans

wer

1,4

00 c

alls

rega

rdin

g fa

ir ho

usin

g is

sues

ann

ually

thro

ugh

the

Fair

Hous

ing/

Pred

ator

y Le

ndin

g Ho

tline

“ The

HCID

LA m

aint

aine

d a

cont

ract

with

the

Hous

ing

Righ

ts C

ente

r (H

RC) t

o pe

rfor

m F

air H

ousin

g ev

alua

tions

. In

the

year

s 20

10-2

011,

HR

C ha

s re

ceiv

ed 1

,999

fair

hous

ing

inqu

iries

; res

olve

d 10

14 fa

ir ho

usin

g in

vest

igat

ions

; con

duct

ed 2

30 fa

ir ho

usin

g tr

aini

ng s

essio

ns;

trai

ned

138

new

fair

hous

ing

test

ers;

and

rece

ived

16,

169

Fair

Hous

ing/

Pred

ator

y Le

ndin

g Ho

tline

cal

ls th

at in

clud

ed te

nant

/land

lord

is

sues

, fai

r hou

sing

conc

erns

, and

hou

sing/

pred

ator

y le

ndin

g ca

lls.”

The

City

wid

e Fa

ir Ho

usin

g Pr

ogra

m h

as p

rovi

ded

esse

ntia

l ser

vice

s to

Los

Ang

eles

Hou

seho

lds

faci

ng h

ousin

g di

scrim

inat

ion

and

to e

duca

te

hous

ing

prov

ider

s ab

out F

eder

al a

nd S

tate

fa

ir ho

usin

g la

w. T

he C

ityw

ide

Fair

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

CDB

G b

udge

t was

cut

by

$110

,000

(1

4% o

f the

City

’s fu

ndin

g) in

201

2-13

.

Reta

in

3.1.

2A. C

omm

unity

Re

inve

stm

ent

Impl

emen

t a

dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ogra

m

in a

t lea

st o

ne lo

w

or m

oder

ate

inco

me

neig

hbor

hood

Stat

us o

f CRA

/LA

proj

ects

was

una

ble

to b

e ob

tain

ed d

ue to

th

e St

ate’

s di

ssol

utio

n of

the

Rede

velo

pmen

t Age

ncie

s.

Effe

ctiv

enes

s is

unkn

own,

and

the

prog

ram

has

en

ded

with

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

ARe

mov

e

Page 53: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-53

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

3.1.

2B. R

espo

nsib

le

Lend

ing

Trai

ning

with

Fi

nanc

ial I

nstit

utio

ns

Impl

emen

t a

dem

onst

ratio

n ou

trea

ch

and

trai

ning

pro

gram

No

dem

onst

ratio

n ou

trea

ch a

nd tr

aini

ng p

rogr

am w

as d

evel

oped

.N

ot e

ffect

ive.

Re

mov

e.

3.2.

1A. H

ousin

g In

form

atio

n Cl

earin

ghou

se

Esta

blish

a c

onso

lidat

ed

hous

ing

info

rmat

ion

data

base

on

the

City

’s w

ebsi

te

No

coor

dina

ted

hous

ing

info

rmat

ion

data

base

has

bee

n cr

eate

d. H

owev

er C

ity D

epar

tmen

ts h

ave

coor

dina

ted

and

shar

ed in

form

atio

n on

hou

sing

for t

he C

ityw

ide

Hous

ing

Prod

uctio

n Sy

stem

(CHP

S) d

atab

ase.

HAC

LA c

ontin

ues

to

use

Soci

al S

erve

for p

rope

rty

listin

gs in

201

1 as

wel

l.

Onl

y so

mew

hat e

ffect

ive.

Re

tain

pro

gram

on

com

pilin

g a

data

base

of a

ssis

ted

hous

ing

units

.

3.2.

1B. H

ousin

g In

form

atio

n Se

rvic

es

Iden

tify

aven

ues

to d

istr

ibut

e an

d di

ssem

inat

e in

form

atio

n

“HAC

LA c

ontin

ued

to c

ondu

ct v

ouch

er is

suan

ce

sess

ions

, wor

ked

with

pro

gram

par

tner

s to

dis

sem

inat

e in

form

atio

n an

d us

ed S

ocia

l Ser

ve fo

r

prop

erty

list

ings

.

CRA

/LA

com

pone

nt w

as n

ot a

ble

to b

e co

llect

ed. “

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e. P

rogr

am o

verla

ps w

ith

Hous

ing

Info

rmat

ion

Clea

ringh

ouse

and

CR

A/L

A pa

rtic

ipat

ion

no lo

nger

exi

sts.

Mer

ge w

ith H

ousin

g In

form

atio

n Cl

earin

ghou

se.

3.2.

1C. D

on’t

Borr

ow

Trou

ble:

Edu

catio

n ag

ains

t Ho

me

Equi

ty F

raud

and

Pr

edat

ory

Lend

ing

Scam

s

Ans

wer

60

DBT/

pred

ator

y le

ndin

g ca

lls a

nnua

lly

thro

ugh

the

Fair

Hous

ing/

Pred

ator

y Le

ndin

g Ho

tline

Don’

t Bor

row

Tro

uble

doe

s no

t exi

st a

s a

stan

d-al

one

prog

ram

; rat

her a

ll ca

llers

with

pre

dato

ry le

ndin

g in

quiri

es

are

assis

ted

and

refe

rred

to a

ppro

pria

te re

sour

ces.

This

serv

ice

is va

luab

le a

nd

assis

ts c

alle

rs e

ach

year

.

Reta

in th

e fu

nctio

n bu

t inc

lude

it in

th

e Ci

tyw

ide

Fair

Hous

ing

prog

ram

de

scrip

tion,

not

a s

tand

alo

ne p

rogr

am.

3.2.

1D. E

duca

tion

for

Buye

rs a

nd H

omeo

wne

rs3,

000

indi

vidu

als

assis

ted

annu

ally

Ove

r 3,0

00 in

divi

dual

s at

tend

ed h

omeb

uyer

s ed

ucat

ion

clas

ses

annu

ally.

This

prog

ram

has

met

its

obje

ctiv

e.

Rem

ove

- The

hom

ebuy

er e

duca

tion

is pr

ovid

ed b

y co

mm

unity

bas

ed o

rgan

izat

ions

in

the

City

. The

HCI

DLA

requ

ires

it fo

r th

e ho

meb

uyer

ass

ista

nce

prog

ram

s, b

ut

does

not

pro

vide

or f

und

the

trai

ning

.

3.2.

1E. E

duca

tion

for

Prop

erty

Ow

ners

Prov

ide

educ

atio

n ab

out

hous

ing

man

agem

ent

prac

tices

and

regu

latio

ns

and

prom

ote

know

ledg

e of

hou

sing

right

s

Stat

us o

f CRA

/LA

proj

ects

was

una

ble

to b

e ob

tain

ed d

ue to

th

e St

ate’

s di

ssol

utio

n of

the

Rede

velo

pmen

t Age

ncie

s.

Effe

ctiv

enes

s is

unkn

own,

and

the

prog

ram

has

en

ded

with

the

diss

olut

ion

of th

e CR

A/L

ARe

mov

e.

3.2.

1F. R

SO T

enan

t/La

ndlo

rd O

utre

ach

and

Educ

atio

n Pr

ogra

m

Deve

lop

mec

hani

sm

to a

ssur

e di

sclo

sure

RFP

& $1

50,0

00 c

ontr

act f

or d

evel

opm

ent o

f lan

dlor

d-te

nant

ou

trea

ch p

rogr

am h

as b

een

com

plet

ed. E

xpan

ded

outr

each

&

trai

ning

is u

nder

way

to p

rom

ote

awar

enes

s of

RSO

tena

nt/

land

lord

righ

ts &

resp

onsib

ilitie

s. S

ever

al o

utre

ach

com

pone

nts

have

bee

n im

plem

ente

d pe

r the

out

reac

h pl

an, s

uch

as

mon

thly

info

rmat

iona

l wor

ksho

ps h

eld

city

wid

e be

gan

in

2011

, and

incl

uded

wor

ksho

ps c

ondu

cted

in S

pani

sh. A

to

tal o

f 78

mon

thly

wor

ksho

ps h

ave

been

con

duct

ed.

Prog

ram

mee

ts o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

.

3.2.

2A. F

air H

ousin

g Aw

aren

ess

Trai

ning

Pr

ogra

m (N

eigh

borh

ood

Coun

cils)

“Est

ablis

h fa

ir ho

usin

g ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

s

Purs

ue fu

ndin

g fo

r tr

aini

ng in

itiat

ives

Prog

ram

has

rem

aine

d on

hol

d pe

ndin

g bu

dget

and

sta

ff re

sour

ces.

Has

not m

et o

bjec

tives

due

to a

lack

of

bud

get a

nd s

taff

reso

urce

s.

Rem

ove.

3.2.

3A. F

air H

ousin

g Re

sear

ch

“Com

plet

e th

e A

I

Iden

tify

and

impl

emen

t ac

tion

item

s”

A co

ntra

ctor

was

sel

ecte

d in

late

201

1 to

dev

elop

a n

ew A

naly

sis

of Im

pedi

men

ts to

Fai

r Hou

sing

Choi

ce (A

I) fo

r the

City

. A d

raft

AI w

as p

oste

d on

the

HCID

LA’s

web

site

for p

ublic

com

men

t in

the

Sprin

g of

201

2. T

he d

ocum

ent w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in e

arly

201

3.

Exte

nsiv

e co

nsul

tatio

ns a

nd re

sear

ch w

ere

cond

ucte

d to

dev

elop

the

new

ana

lysis

. In

form

atio

n fro

m th

e dr

aft A

I has

bee

n us

eful

for t

he n

ew F

ive

Year

Con

solid

ated

Pl

an c

urre

ntly

und

er d

evel

opm

ent.

Reta

in

Page 54: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-54 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.1.

1A. D

omes

tic V

iole

nce

Shel

ter P

rogr

am

“Pro

vide

2,8

50 in

divi

dual

s w

ith a

cces

s to

pub

lic

serv

ices

ann

ually

Mai

ntai

n up

to 1

,006

sh

elte

r and

tran

sitio

nal

beds

ann

ually

for d

omes

tic

viol

ence

vic

tims”

“148

8 in

divi

dual

s w

ere

prov

ided

acc

ess

to p

ublic

ser

vice

s fo

r Pr

ogra

m Y

ear b

egin

ning

in A

pril

2012

. Dat

a is

thro

ugh

Feb.

201

3.

587

shel

ter a

nd tr

ansi

tiona

l bed

s pr

ovid

ed”

Prog

ram

con

tinue

s to

be

effe

ctiv

e. S

ince

the

time

the

Hous

ing

Elem

ent w

as fi

rst d

raft

ed, a

nu

mbe

r of b

eds

have

bee

n lo

st d

ue to

clo

sure

of

a co

uple

of s

helte

rs. F

utur

e go

als

shou

ld b

e m

ore

in li

ne w

ith 2

011

and

2012

ann

ual p

erfo

rman

ce.

Cont

inue

, how

ever

dec

reas

e nu

mer

ical

ob

ject

ives

to re

flect

clo

sure

of a

fe

w s

helte

rs in

rece

nt y

ears

4.1.

1B. H

OPW

A Em

erge

ncy

Shel

ter a

nd T

rans

ition

al

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

“20

exis

ting

HIV/

AID

S em

erge

ncy

shel

ter b

eds

fund

ed a

nnua

lly

152

exis

ting

HIV/

AID

S tr

ansi

tiona

l hou

sing

beds

fund

ed a

nnua

lly

30 n

ew H

IV/A

IDS

tran

sitio

nal h

ousin

g be

ds fu

nded

ann

ually

Durin

g 20

06-2

012,

1,2

95 h

ouse

hold

s w

ere

assis

ted.

In 2

011-

2012

ther

e w

ere

48 e

mer

genc

y an

d 12

7 tr

ansi

tiona

l bed

s.

This

is th

e fir

st s

tep

into

get

ting

clie

nts

into

per

man

ent h

ousin

g. T

here

is a

ne

ed fo

r mor

e tr

ansi

tiona

l hou

sing.

Mod

ify th

e ex

istin

g 6

HOPW

A ca

tego

ries

to th

e fo

llow

ing:

1) H

ousin

g Su

bsid

y A

ssis

tanc

e, 2

) Sup

port

ive

Serv

ices

, 3) P

erm

anen

t Sup

port

ive

Hous

ing

Deve

lopm

ent,

4) H

ousin

g Pl

acem

ent A

ssis

tanc

e Ac

tiviti

es

4.1.

1C. S

helte

r an

d Tr

ansi

tiona

l Ho

usin

g Fa

cilit

ies

“829

exi

stin

g em

erge

ncy

shel

ter b

eds

fund

ed a

nnua

lly

2,88

0 ex

istin

g tr

ansi

tiona

l hou

sing

beds

fund

ed a

nnua

lly”

The

Los

Ang

eles

Con

tinuu

m o

f Car

e ha

s 5,

892

emer

genc

y ho

usin

g be

ds, i

nclu

ding

1,4

92 w

inte

r she

lter b

eds,

1,3

07

beds

for f

amili

es, a

nd 3

,183

bed

s fo

r ind

ivid

uals

. Pr

ogra

m e

xcee

ded

obje

ctiv

es.

Reta

in

4.1.

1D. O

vern

ight

She

lter

(Win

ter S

helte

r and

Ye

ar-R

ound

She

lter)

“954

tem

pora

ry s

helte

r be

ds y

ear r

ound

Serv

e 30

or m

ore

fam

ilies

by

vou

cher

s in

the

Year

Ro

und

Shel

ter P

rogr

am

1,76

8 te

mpo

rary

w

inte

r she

lter b

eds

Serv

e 20

0 or

mor

e fa

mili

es

and

15 o

r mor

e in

divi

dual

s by

vou

cher

s in

the

Win

ter

Shel

ter P

rogr

am”

The

Los

Ang

eles

Con

tinuu

m o

f Car

e ha

s 5,

892

emer

genc

y ho

usin

g be

ds, i

nclu

ding

1,4

92 w

inte

r she

lter b

eds,

1,3

07

beds

for f

amili

es, a

nd 3

,183

bed

s fo

r ind

ivid

uals

. La

rgel

y m

et o

bjec

tives

.Re

tain

4.1.

1E. R

esou

rces

fo

r She

lters

Dist

ribut

e go

ods

to 2

20

or m

ore

hom

eles

s se

rvic

e ag

enci

es a

nd h

ousin

g pr

ovid

ers

annu

ally

City

is n

ot in

volv

ed in

this

prog

ram

. Are

a or

gani

zatio

n (S

helte

r Pa

rtne

rshi

p) c

ontin

ues

to c

oord

inat

e th

e pr

ovisi

on o

f goo

ds

to h

omel

ess

serv

ice

agen

cies

and

hou

sing

prov

ider

s.

Effe

ctiv

e, b

ut w

ithou

t act

ive

City

par

ticip

atio

n.

Rem

ove

as C

ity is

no

long

er

invo

lved

in p

rogr

am.

4.1.

2A. P

riorit

y O

ccup

ancy

fo

r Hom

eles

s Pe

rson

s

Adop

t city

wid

e po

licy

and

amen

d ci

ty c

odes

and

re

gula

tions

to fa

cilit

ate

prio

rity

hous

ing

occu

panc

y fo

r hom

eles

s an

d sp

ecia

l ne

eds

hous

ehol

ds

Prog

ram

doe

s no

t app

ear t

o ha

ve p

rogr

esse

d.

Not

effe

ctiv

e. C

RA/L

A w

as le

ad a

genc

y.

Rem

ove,

as

CRA

is go

ne. A

com

mitm

ent

to in

clud

e 30

% o

f all

new

affo

rdab

le

rent

al h

ousin

g as

per

man

ent s

uppo

rtiv

e ho

usin

g is

incl

uded

in n

ew p

rogr

am N

ew

Prod

uctio

n of

Affo

rdab

le H

ousin

g.

Page 55: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-55

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.1.

3A. C

omm

unity

Ba

sed

Deve

lopm

ent

Org

aniz

atio

n (C

BDO

)

Prov

ide

educ

atio

nal/

voca

tiona

l tra

inin

g an

d em

ploy

men

t pla

cem

ent/

rete

ntio

n se

rvic

es to

280

ho

mel

ess

pers

ons

annu

ally

“Ove

r an

18 m

onth

per

iod

from

201

1-20

12:

Com

plet

ed E

duca

tiona

l/Voc

atio

nal T

rain

ing:

2,1

01 p

erso

ns

Obt

aine

d Em

ploy

men

t: 81

9 pe

rson

s

Reta

ined

Em

ploy

men

t: 81

9 pe

rson

s”

Exce

eded

obj

ectiv

es.

App

ropr

iate

to c

ontin

ue. C

hang

e na

me

to “

Job

Trai

ning

and

Pla

cem

ent

for H

omel

ess

Indi

vidu

als.”

4.1.

3B. H

OPW

A Su

ppor

tive

Serv

ices

for P

erso

ns

Livi

ng w

ith H

IV/A

IDS

Prov

ide

13,5

00 c

lient

s w

ith s

uppo

rtiv

e se

rvic

es a

nnua

llyDu

ring

2006

-201

2, 9

,047

hou

seho

lds

wer

e as

siste

d.

Supp

ortiv

e Se

rvic

es in

clud

e ho

usin

g sp

ecia

list,

men

tal h

ealth

and

sub

stan

ce s

ervi

ces,

food

se

rvic

es, l

egal

ser

vice

s an

d an

imal

sup

port

Re

tain

4.1.

3C. R

enta

l Ass

ista

nce

for H

omel

ess

Pers

ons

Dist

ribut

e 4,

000

Hous

ing

Choi

ce

Vouc

hers

to h

omel

ess

hous

ehol

ds a

nnua

lly

HAC

LA in

crea

sed

the

tota

l of t

enan

t-ba

sed

vouc

hers

set

asid

e fo

r the

hom

eles

s in

200

8 by

1,0

00 to

401

1. H

ACLA

add

ed a

50

0 vo

uche

r set

asid

e fo

r the

Chr

onic

ally

Hom

eles

s in

201

2.Ve

ry e

ffect

ive,

exc

eedi

ng o

bjec

tive.

Prog

ram

s sh

ould

con

tinue

as-

is du

e to

the

trem

endo

us n

eed

in th

e co

mm

unity

. Sub

ject

to

futu

re re

view

of H

ACLA

reso

urce

s.

Repl

ace

“per

sons

” w

ith “

hous

ehol

ds”.

4.1.

3D. R

enta

l Ass

ista

nce

for H

omel

ess

Pers

ons

with

Dis

abili

ties

Mai

ntai

n ho

usin

g of

2,0

00

hom

eles

s ho

useh

olds

w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s an

nual

ly

As

of 2

012,

HAC

LA h

ad 3

,073

uni

ts o

f sup

port

ive

hous

ing

allo

cate

d fo

r the

hom

eles

s w

ith d

isab

ling

cond

ition

s.Ve

ry e

ffect

ive,

exc

eedi

ng o

bjec

tive.

Prog

ram

sho

uld

cont

inue

as-

is, w

ith

grea

ter e

mph

asis

on p

erm

anen

t su

ppor

tive

hous

ing.

Rep

lace

“p

erso

ns”

with

“ho

useh

olds

”.

4.1.

3E. H

OPW

A Re

ntal

A

ssis

tanc

e fo

r Per

sons

Li

ving

with

HIV

/AID

S

“63

extr

emel

y lo

w

inco

me

and

21 v

ery

low

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds

rece

ive

TRA

annu

ally

13 e

xtre

mel

y lo

w

inco

me

and

18 v

ery

low

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds

rece

ive

PBRA

ann

ually

305

low

inco

me

hous

ehol

ds re

ceiv

e ST

RMU

assis

tanc

e an

nual

ly”

Durin

g 20

06-2

012,

242

hou

seho

lds

wer

e as

siste

d. T

he m

ajor

ity o

f th

ese

hous

ehol

ds a

re e

xtre

mel

y lo

w in

com

e. 8

0 ho

useh

olds

wer

e as

siste

d w

ith p

roje

ct b

ased

and

sca

tter

ed s

ite m

aste

r lea

sing

hous

ing.

77

0 ho

useh

olds

wer

e as

siste

d w

ith s

hort

term

rent

al m

ortg

age

and

utili

ty (S

TRM

U) g

rant

s w

hich

hel

p th

em m

aint

ain

thei

r hou

sing

Very

effe

ctiv

e. T

he T

enan

t Bas

ed R

enta

l A

ssis

tanc

e (T

BRA)

pro

gram

is p

rovi

ded

by

the

Hous

ing

Auth

oriti

es a

nd a

llow

s cl

ient

s to

tr

ansi

tion

into

the

Hous

ing

Choi

ce V

ouch

er

prog

ram

whi

ch is

the

perm

anen

t hou

sing.

Th

e pr

ogra

m is

bei

ng m

odifi

ed to

ens

ure

clie

nts

in th

e TB

RA re

ceiv

e su

ppor

tive

serv

ice

so th

ey c

an m

aint

ain

thei

r hou

sing.

Cont

inue

pro

gram

with

pro

pose

d m

odifi

catio

n. R

epla

ce “

pers

ons”

w

ith “

hous

ehol

ds”.

4.1.

3F. C

ityw

ide

Rent

-to-

Prev

ent-

Evic

tion

Prog

ram

Ass

ist 1

10-1

25 in

divi

dual

s or

fam

ilies

at r

isk o

f ho

mel

essn

ess

annu

ally

In th

e la

st y

ear o

f the

pro

gram

(201

0), 1

15 a

dults

wer

e as

siste

d, a

s w

ell a

s 88

hou

seho

lds

(fam

ilies

).

Prog

ram

had

bee

n m

eetin

g its

obj

ectiv

es

until

CDB

G fu

ndin

g ex

pire

d in

201

1,

leav

ing

the

prog

ram

with

no

fund

ing.

Re

mov

e, g

iven

lack

of f

undi

ng.

4.1.

3G. N

ew R

esou

rces

fo

r Ren

tal A

ssis

tanc

e

Incr

ease

the

fund

ing

base

fo

r ren

tal a

ssis

tanc

e fo

r ho

mel

ess

hous

ehol

ds

and

hous

ehol

ds a

t hig

h ris

k of

hom

eles

snes

s

“The

CRA

/LA

deve

lope

d re

sour

ces

for r

enta

l ass

ista

nce,

bu

t the

tota

l pro

gres

s is

unab

le to

be

retr

ieve

d du

e to

th

e di

ssol

utio

n of

the

Rede

velo

pmen

t Age

ncie

s.

LAHS

A is

fund

ing

activ

ities

thro

ugh

its E

SG

gran

t. A

ll HP

RP fu

nds

fully

exp

ende

d.”

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e.Re

tain

.

4.1.

3H. H

OPW

A Ho

usin

g De

velo

pmen

t for

Per

sons

Li

ving

with

HIV

/AID

S

Fina

ncin

g co

mm

itmen

t to

, at m

inim

um, o

ne

hous

ing

deve

lopm

ent p

er

year

ded

icat

ed to

ser

ving

pe

rson

s liv

ing

with

HIV

/A

IDS

and

thei

r fam

ilies

Sinc

e 20

06, 3

1 HO

PWA

units

hav

e be

en fi

nanc

ed

as p

erm

anen

t sup

port

ive

hous

ing.

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e.

Reta

in

Page 56: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-56 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.1.

3I. P

erm

anen

t Su

ppor

tive

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

2,22

4 pe

rman

ent

supp

ortiv

e ho

usin

g un

its fi

nanc

ed fo

r ho

mel

ess

hous

ehol

ds

From

sta

rt o

f the

PSH

P to

pre

sent

, 35

proj

ects

ha

ve b

een

fund

ed c

reat

ing

2,17

8 un

its.

Effe

ctiv

e an

d th

e Ci

ty w

ill c

ontin

ue

to fu

lly s

uppo

rt th

e PS

HP.

Reta

in

4.1.

3J. N

ew R

esou

rces

fo

r Hou

sing

Serv

ing

the

Men

tally

Ill

Purs

ue fu

ndin

g to

war

ds

perm

anen

t hou

sing

units

for h

omel

ess

men

tally

ill a

nnua

lly

“Sin

ce th

e re

leas

e of

the

Fede

ral S

trat

egic

Pla

n to

End

Hom

eles

snes

s &

the

loca

l Hom

e fo

r Goo

d pl

an, L

AHS

A is

taki

ng a

targ

eted

ap

proa

ch to

ass

essin

g ne

ed a

nd s

ettin

g re

gion

al p

riorit

ies

for

CH, V

ets,

fam

ilies

& y

outh

. Bas

ed o

n ou

r 201

1 Ho

mel

ess

Coun

t, ap

prox

imat

ely

35%

are

sev

erel

y m

enta

lly il

l. RF

Ps fo

r new

fund

ing

unde

r the

Sup

erN

OFA

app

licat

ion

targ

et th

ese

grou

ps. I

n ad

ditio

n,

the

Year

Rou

nd P

rogr

am a

lso

targ

ets

thes

e gr

oups

. LA

HSA

will

als

o co

ntin

ue to

fund

the

two

safe

hav

ens

of w

hich

one

is lo

cate

d in

Ski

d Ro

w a

nd p

rovi

des

50 b

eds

to in

divi

dual

s w

ith s

ever

e m

enta

l illn

ess.

Larg

ely

effe

ctiv

e, a

lthou

gh d

ifficu

lt to

mea

sure

ef

fect

iven

ess

give

n la

ck o

f pre

cise

obj

ectiv

es.

Reta

in w

ithou

t the

wor

k “N

ew”

in ti

tle.

The

City

will

con

tinue

its

wor

k w

ith

inte

rest

ed s

take

hold

ers,

par

ticul

arly

at t

he

Coun

ty le

vel,

to fu

nd a

fford

able

hou

sing

with

inte

nsiv

e, w

rap-

arou

nd s

ervi

ces.

4.1.

3K. P

erm

anen

t Ho

usin

g (fo

r per

sons

w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s)

Mai

ntai

n 1,

477

perm

anen

t su

ppor

tive

hous

ing

units

for h

omel

es

hous

ehol

ds a

nnua

lly

The

mos

t rec

ent d

ata

avai

labl

e (fr

om 2

012)

, ind

icat

es

that

a to

tal o

f 1,1

20 p

erm

anen

t sup

port

ive

hous

ing

units

fo

r per

sons

with

Dis

abili

ties

is be

ing

mai

ntai

ned.

La

rgel

y ef

fect

ive

at m

eetin

g go

al.

Reta

in a

nd a

dd L

AHS

A as

an

agen

cy.

4.1.

3L. L

os A

ngel

es

Supp

ortiv

e Ho

usin

g Ac

quisi

tion

Fund

Supp

ort s

ite a

cqui

sitio

n an

d pr

e-de

velo

pmen

t of

up to

1,5

00 h

ousin

g un

its

Sinc

e its

ince

ptio

n in

200

8, th

e Ci

ty o

f Los

Ang

eles

Sup

port

ive

Hous

ing

Loan

Fun

d ha

s fin

ance

d th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

lmos

t 1,5

00

units

of s

uppo

rtiv

e ho

usin

g. T

he fu

nd a

llow

s no

npro

fit o

rgan

izat

ions

to

com

pete

suc

cess

fully

for s

carc

e la

nd b

y pr

ovid

ing

fund

s qu

ickl

y,

and

incr

easin

g ef

ficie

ncy

thro

ugh

a on

e-st

op s

ourc

e fo

r acq

uisi

tion

and

pred

evel

opm

ent c

apita

l whi

le s

ecur

ing

perm

anen

t fina

ncin

g.

Effe

ctiv

e. P

erm

anen

t Sup

port

ive

Hous

ing

Prog

ram

(PSH

P) is

coo

rdin

atin

g w

ith H

ACLA

, TC

AC a

nd D

ept.

of M

enta

l Hea

lth S

ervi

ces.

To

max

imiz

e ef

fect

iven

ess

HCID

LA h

as

alig

ned

this

fund

with

the

perm

anen

t fun

ding

so

urce

s av

aila

ble

to th

ese

proj

ects

.

Reta

in b

ut m

erge

with

larg

er A

fford

able

Ho

usin

g Pr

oduc

tion

prog

ram

, whe

reas

30%

of

all

units

will

be

supp

ortiv

e ho

usin

g un

its.

Util

izes

the

Supp

rort

ive

Hous

ing

Loan

Fun

d.

4.1.

4A. H

omel

ess

Hous

ing

and

Serv

ices

Coo

rdin

atio

n

“City

wid

e an

d su

b-re

gion

al p

lans

to

redu

ce a

nd e

nd

hom

eles

snes

s ad

opte

d by

the

City

Cou

ncil

Regu

lar r

epor

ts o

n fin

anci

al m

anag

emen

t

Regu

alr r

epor

ts o

n co

ntra

ct m

anag

emen

t and

pr

ogra

m im

plem

enta

tion”

“Fol

low

ing

the

Fede

ral S

trat

egic

Pla

n, O

peni

ng D

oors

, the

LA

Cont

inuu

m o

f Car

e (C

oC) h

as p

riorit

ized

thre

e ke

y go

als:

end

ing

chro

nic

hom

eles

snes

s; p

reve

ntin

g an

d en

ding

vet

eran

hom

eles

snes

s;

and

prev

entin

g an

d en

ding

hom

eles

snes

s fo

r fam

ilies

, you

th, a

nd

child

ren.

As

note

d ab

ove,

LA

HSA

requ

ires

all a

pplic

ants

for n

ew C

oC

fund

ing

to a

lloca

te 1

00%

of t

heir

units

to th

e ch

roni

cally

hom

eles

s.

The

CoC’

s m

ost r

ecen

t pla

n, H

ome

For G

ood,

was

fo

rmal

ly a

dopt

ed in

201

0. H

owev

er, t

he C

oC’s

stra

tegy

is c

ontin

uing

to e

volv

e th

roug

h de

velo

pmen

t of p

lace

-bas

ed

com

mun

ity p

lans

alig

ned

with

the

Fede

ral S

trat

egic

Pla

n an

d Ho

me

for G

ood.

A to

tal o

f 10

com

mun

ity p

lans

will

be

deve

lope

d an

d in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Co

C’s

stra

tegi

c ef

fort

s ov

er th

e ne

xt fi

ve y

ears

.”

Effe

ctiv

eRe

tain

, upd

ate

with

em

phas

is on

Hom

es fo

r Goo

d Pl

an.

4.1.

4B. A

cces

s N

ew

Reso

urce

s an

d Se

rvic

es

for t

he H

omel

ess

Perio

dic

repo

rts

on s

tate

an

d co

unty

legi

slativ

e an

d bu

dget

ary

inita

tives

“The

City

and

LA

HSA

have

issu

ed p

erio

dic

repo

rts

on S

tate

and

Co

unty

legi

slativ

e an

d bu

dget

ary

initi

ativ

es th

at c

ould

ben

efit

prog

ram

s se

rvin

g th

e ho

mel

ess.

Thi

s in

clud

ed o

ffici

al C

ity

supp

ort f

or H

.R. 8

40 in

200

7-20

08 -

the

Hom

eles

s Em

erge

ncy

Ass

ista

nce

and

Rapi

d Tr

ansi

tion

to H

ousin

g (H

EART

H) A

ct o

f 200

7.”

The

City

has

bee

n re

lativ

ely

effe

ctiv

e at

ac

cess

ing

new

reso

urce

s an

d se

rvic

es

for t

he h

omel

ess

popu

latio

n.

Reta

in.

Page 57: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-57

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.1.

4C. H

ousin

g an

d Se

rvic

es P

lann

ing

for P

erso

ns L

ivin

g w

ith H

IV/A

IDS

Regu

larly

upd

ated

pl

an fo

r the

use

of

HOPW

A gr

ant f

unds

The

Hous

ing

Opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r Per

sons

livi

ng w

ith A

IDS

(HO

PWA)

Req

uest

For

Pro

posa

ls (R

FP) i

nclu

ded

inpu

t fro

m fo

cus

grou

ps w

ith p

rovi

ders

; hel

d an

d st

affe

d bi

mon

thly

mee

tings

w

/ Los

Ang

eles

Cou

nty

HIV/

AID

S Co

mm

ittee

(LAC

HAC

); HO

PWA

tech

nica

l ser

vice

s pr

ovid

er c

ompl

eted

ass

essm

ent o

f th

e Ho

tel/F

ood

Vouc

her P

rogr

am a

nd H

ousin

g Ca

se M

anag

er

posi

tion,

and

reco

mm

enda

tions

for c

hang

es to

pro

gram

s.

Effe

ctiv

e Re

tain

4.1.

4D. C

ity H

omel

ess

Coor

dina

tor

Perio

dic

repo

rts

on

hom

eles

s ho

usin

g an

d se

rvic

e de

liver

y an

d re

com

men

datio

ns

for i

mpr

ovem

ent

No

prog

ress

has

bee

n m

ade

in h

iring

a C

ity H

omel

ess

Coor

dina

tor.

How

ever

, as

the

lead

for t

he L

os A

ngel

es C

ontin

uum

of C

are,

LA

HSA

, con

duct

s qu

arte

rly m

eetin

gs to

dis

cuss

effo

rts

on h

ow to

co

mba

t hom

eles

snes

s ef

fect

ivel

y an

d ef

ficie

ntly.

Att

ende

es in

clud

e Ci

ty a

nd C

ount

y re

pres

enta

tives

to e

nsur

e a

info

rmat

ion

shar

ing

and

coor

dina

ted

proc

ess.

Eac

h ye

ar, t

here

are

app

roxi

mat

ely

20 C

ontin

uum

mee

tings

feat

urin

g ov

er 4

50 h

omel

ess

serv

ice

prov

ider

s, c

ity a

nd c

ount

y re

pres

enta

tives

, sch

ool d

istr

icts

, po

licy

mak

ers,

faith

bas

ed a

nd g

rass

root

s or

gani

zatio

ns, a

nd

othe

r hom

eles

s st

akeh

olde

rs. I

n ad

ditio

n, o

n a

mon

thly

bas

is,

LAHS

A pr

ovid

es fi

nanc

ial a

nd c

ontr

act m

anag

emen

t rep

orts

to

des

igna

ted

Com

mitt

ees

of th

e LA

HSA

Com

mis

sion.

Effe

ctiv

e de

spite

the

lack

of o

ne o

vera

ll co

ordi

nato

r pos

ition

to a

ct a

s a

liais

on

betw

een

LAHS

A, C

ity A

genc

ies,

the

Coun

ty a

nd o

ther

regi

onal

bod

ies.

.

Reta

in

4.1.

5A. T

empo

rary

Ho

usin

g Fa

cilit

ies

for

Disa

ster

Res

pons

e

120

site

s av

aila

ble

thro

ugho

ut th

e Ci

ty

with

in 2

4 ho

urs

of a

na

tura

l dis

aste

r

“The

City

is u

nder

taki

ng R

egio

nal D

isas

ter H

ousin

g Pl

anni

ng a

ctiv

ities

fund

ed b

y th

e Re

gion

al

Cata

stro

phic

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Pro

gram

(RCP

GP)

aw

ards

from

the

Fede

ral E

mer

genc

y

Man

agem

ent A

genc

y (F

EMA)

. The

pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es

incl

ude

a di

sast

er w

orki

ng g

roup

com

pris

ed o

f loc

al

hous

ing

indu

stry

repr

esen

tativ

es a

s w

ell a

s st

ate

and

fede

ral h

ousin

g an

d di

sast

er p

lann

ing

expe

rts.

Co

ntac

ts a

re b

eing

mad

e w

ith th

e lo

cal

Emer

genc

y N

etw

ork

Los

Ang

eles

, a c

olla

bora

tive

grou

p of

non

-pro

fits

that

are

vol

unta

ry

orga

niza

tions

act

ive

in d

isas

ters

(VO

ADs

). “

Effe

ctiv

e. S

ince

pos

t-di

sast

er h

ousin

g av

aila

bilit

y is

a se

rious

pro

blem

and

affe

cts

the

mos

t vu

lner

able

City

resid

ents

, thi

s is

a ke

y ar

ea o

f co

ordi

natio

n th

at n

eeds

to b

e ex

pand

ed.

Reta

in.

4.1.

5B. O

utre

ach

and

Trai

ning

for E

mer

genc

y Pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd

Resp

onse

“4 fa

irs d

urin

g Em

erge

ncy

Prep

ared

enss

M

onth

ann

ually

2 N

eigh

borh

ood

Prep

ared

enss

A

mba

ssad

ors

Trai

ning

s an

nual

ly

Out

reac

h to

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d an

d co

mm

unity

gro

ups

as re

ques

ted”

“The

City

is u

nder

taki

ng R

egio

nal D

isas

ter H

ousin

g Pl

anni

ng a

ctiv

ities

fund

ed b

y th

e Re

gion

al

Cata

stro

phic

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Pro

gram

(RCP

GP)

aw

ards

from

the

Fede

ral E

mer

genc

y

Man

agem

ent A

genc

y (F

EMA)

. The

pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es

incl

ude

a di

sast

er w

orki

ng g

roup

com

pris

ed o

f loc

al

hous

ing

indu

stry

repr

esen

tativ

es a

s w

ell a

s st

ate

and

fede

ral h

ousin

g an

d di

sast

er p

lann

ing

expe

rts.

Co

ntac

ts a

re b

eing

mad

e w

ith th

e lo

cal

Emer

genc

y N

etw

ork

Los

Ang

eles

, a c

olla

bora

tive

grou

p of

non

-pro

fits

that

are

vol

unta

ry

orga

niza

tions

act

ive

in d

isas

ters

(VO

ADs

). “

Effe

ctiv

e. S

ince

pos

t-di

sast

er h

ousin

g av

aila

bilit

y is

a se

rious

pro

blem

and

affe

cts

the

mos

t vu

lner

able

City

resid

ents

, thi

s is

a ke

y ar

ea o

f co

ordi

natio

n th

at n

eeds

to b

e ex

pand

ed.

Reta

in

Page 58: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

I-58 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.1.

6A. S

iting

Hom

eles

s Ho

usin

g an

d Se

rvic

es

“Ide

ntify

loca

tions

fo

r hou

sing

with

su

ppor

tive

serv

ices

in

16 C

omm

unity

Pla

ns

Iden

tify

targ

ets

in a

ll Co

mm

unity

Pla

ns”

The

new

Com

mun

ity P

lans

hav

e no

t bee

n id

entif

ying

spe

cific

lo

catio

ns fo

r hou

sing

with

sup

port

ive

serv

ices

. How

ever

sin

gle-

room

occ

upan

cy (S

RO),

tran

sitio

nal,

and

supp

ortiv

e ho

usin

g ar

e co

nsid

ered

the

sam

e as

mul

ti-fa

mily

hou

sing

and

are

perm

itted

whe

reve

r mul

ti-fa

mily

is p

erm

itted

.

Not

effe

ctiv

e bu

t als

o so

mew

hat u

nnec

essa

ry

give

n th

at n

o sp

ecia

lized

loca

tions

are

requ

ired

to s

ite s

uch

hous

ing

in L

os A

ngel

es.

Rem

ove

4.1.

6B. Z

onin

g an

d De

velo

pmen

t Sta

ndar

ds

for S

helte

rs

Adop

t am

endm

ent t

o Zo

ning

Cod

e to

faci

litat

e by

-rig

ht s

iting

of

shel

ter a

nd tr

ansi

tiona

l ho

usin

g fa

cilit

ies

A Co

mm

unity

Car

e Fa

cilit

ies

Ord

inan

ce h

as b

een

prop

osed

, w

hich

see

ks to

am

end

the

City

Cod

e to

be

cons

iste

nt w

ith

the

Calif

orni

a Co

mm

unity

Car

e Fa

cilit

ies

Act.

The

Ord

inan

ce

is lik

ely

to a

ffect

cer

tain

tran

sitio

nal h

ousin

g fa

cilit

ies

in

the

City

. In

early

201

3, th

e O

rdin

ance

had

bee

n se

nt to

a

wor

king

gro

up to

furt

her fl

esh

out t

he re

leva

nt is

sues

.

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e. A

Zon

ing

Code

am

endm

ent h

as b

een

prop

osed

but

som

e of

the

polic

y di

rect

ions

rem

ain

uncl

ear.

Reta

in.

4.1.

6C. Z

onin

g fo

r He

alth

Fac

ilitie

s

Adop

t am

endm

ent

to Z

onin

g Co

de to

re

mov

e re

stric

tions

on

loca

tions

of p

ublic

he

alth

and

trea

tmen

t pr

ogra

m fa

cilit

ies

A Co

mm

unity

Car

e Fa

cilit

ies

Ord

inan

ce h

as b

een

prop

osed

, whi

ch

seek

s to

am

end

the

City

Cod

e to

be

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

e Ca

lifor

nia

Com

mun

ity C

are

Faci

litie

s Ac

t. Th

e O

rdin

ance

is li

kely

to a

ffect

ce

rtai

n ty

pes

of tr

eatm

ent f

acili

ties

as w

ell a

s re

siden

tial c

are

faci

litie

s fo

r the

eld

erly

in th

e Ci

ty. I

n ea

rly 2

013,

the

Ord

inan

ce h

ad

been

sen

t to

a w

orki

ng g

roup

to fu

rthe

r fles

h ou

t the

rele

vant

issu

es.

Som

ewha

t effe

ctiv

e. A

Zon

ing

Code

am

endm

ent

has

been

pro

pose

d bu

t som

e of

the

polic

y di

rect

ions

on

the

trea

tmen

t of h

ealth

and

tr

eatm

ent f

acili

ties

rem

ain

uncl

ear.

Reta

in.

4.2.

1A. A

ssis

tanc

e fo

r Hom

eles

s Pe

rson

s in

Acc

essin

g Ho

usin

g an

d Se

rvic

es

“Con

tinue

fund

ing

1 or

gani

zatio

n to

re

ach

300

or m

ore

hom

eles

s in

divi

dual

s

Expl

ore

expa

ndin

g ou

trea

ch fu

ndin

g to

com

mun

ity-

base

d or

gani

zatio

ns

with

in th

e Ci

ty”

A to

tal o

f 2,4

65 h

omel

ess

pers

ons

have

bee

n re

ache

d th

roug

h LA

HSA’

s Em

erge

ncy

Resp

onse

Tea

ms.

In re

cent

yea

rs, L

AHS

A ha

s be

en im

plem

entin

g va

rious

pro

gram

s to

ens

ure

that

out

reac

h is

expa

nded

. LA

HSA

, in

colla

bora

tion

with

the

City

and

Cou

nty

of

Los

Ang

eles

is b

uild

ing

regi

onal

sys

tem

s of

car

e th

at w

ill p

rovi

de

coor

dina

ted

asse

ssm

ents

for r

ecei

pt o

f hom

eles

s se

rvic

es, p

reve

nts

hom

eles

snes

s by

hel

ping

fam

ilies

rem

ain

with

in th

eir c

omm

uniti

es

and

reta

in th

eir c

urre

nt n

on-s

helte

r hou

sing,

or d

iver

ts p

eopl

e to

hou

sing

optio

ns o

ther

than

hom

eles

s sh

elte

rs. T

he fi

rst s

tep

in th

is pr

oces

s w

as th

e Fa

mily

Tra

nsiti

ons

Proj

ect (

FTP)

, whi

ch

stre

amlin

ed in

take

of h

omel

ess

fam

ilies

see

king

mot

el v

ouch

ers

durin

g th

e w

inte

r mon

ths,

resu

lting

in im

prov

ed c

oord

inat

ion

and

mor

e fa

mili

es b

eing

div

erte

d aw

ay fr

om h

omel

essn

ess

and

bein

g ra

pidl

y re

hous

ed in

per

man

ent h

ousin

g. B

uild

ing

on th

e su

cces

s of

the

FTP,

LA

HSA

, in

part

ners

hip

with

the

City

and

Cou

nty

of L

os

Ang

eles

, is

pool

ing

reso

urce

s to

fund

the

Fam

ily S

olut

ions

Cen

ters

(F

SC),

whi

ch w

ill p

rovi

de c

oord

inat

ed e

ntry

, int

ake

asse

ssm

ent,

and

hous

ing

and

supp

ortiv

e se

rvic

es in

terv

entio

ns to

hom

eles

s fa

mili

es a

nd fa

mili

es a

t-ris

k of

hom

eles

snes

s ac

ross

the

vario

us

regi

ons

of L

os A

ngel

es C

ount

y. In

col

labo

ratio

n w

ith m

ains

trea

m

reso

urce

s an

d ta

rget

ed h

omel

ess

reso

urce

s, th

is ne

w in

tegr

ated

Co

unty

wid

e sy

stem

will

pro

vide

the

appr

opria

te le

vel o

f ser

vice

s an

d ho

usin

g to

eac

h fa

mily

in n

eed.

The

ulti

mat

e go

als

of th

is co

ordi

nate

d sy

stem

will

be

to d

iver

t fam

ilies

from

bec

omin

g ho

mel

ess

and

to e

nd fa

mili

es’ h

omel

essn

ess

as ra

pidl

y as

pos

sible

.

Very

effe

ctiv

e. A

lthou

gh th

e pr

ogra

m

can

be m

erge

d w

ith a

new

spe

cial

ized

pr

ogra

m th

at m

eets

its

obje

ctiv

es.

Rem

ove,

com

bine

with

new

pro

gram

(F

amily

Sol

utio

ns C

ente

r).

Page 59: Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element - LA City Planning · Cover Image TK Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element Appendix i. Photo TK. Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies

Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-59

Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs

Prog

ram

s fr

om H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Obj

ectiv

e/St

rate

gy

as li

sted

in H

ousi

ng

Elem

ent 2

006-

2014

Prog

ress

, Jan

uary

1, 2

006

to P

rese

ntEf

fect

iven

ess

App

ropr

iate

ness

(i.e

. sho

uld

prog

ram

be

reta

ined

or m

odifi

ed)

4.2.

1B. C

ompu

teriz

ed

Info

rmat

ion

Cent

er/

Info

rmat

ion

and

Refe

rral

s fo

r Per

sons

w

ith D

isab

ilitie

s

Ass

ist 1

50 o

r mor

e cl

ient

s se

ekin

g ho

mel

ess

serv

ices

an

d ho

usin

g re

sour

ce

refe

rral

s an

nual

ly

The

CIC

uses

a c

usto

m s

oftw

are

prog

ram

to p

rovi

de in

form

atio

n on

and

refe

rral

to c

ritic

al s

ervi

ces

offe

red

thro

ugho

ut th

e gr

eate

r Lo

s A

ngel

es a

rea.

CIC

sta

ff pr

ovid

e re

ferr

als

to o

ver 1

000

pers

ons

with

dis

abili

ties

and

agen

cies

ann

ually

. The

dat

abas

e re

sour

ces

incl

ude:

hou

sing,

em

erge

ncy

shel

ter,

acce

ssib

le

tran

spor

tatio

n, e

mpl

oym

ent t

rain

ing,

job

plac

emen

t, an

d re

crea

tiona

l opp

ortu

nitie

s. W

e w

ere

not a

ble

to d

eter

min

e th

e nu

mbe

r of h

ousin

g re

ferr

als

mad

e in

from

200

6 to

cur

rent

.

Effe

ctiv

e.

Reta

in

4.2.

1C. H

OPW

A Ce

ntra

lized

Cou

ntyw

ide

Holu

sing

Info

rmat

ion

Serv

ices

Cle

arin

ghou

se

Ass

ist 2

,640

clie

nts

seek

ing

HIV/

AID

S ho

usin

g in

form

atio

n re

ferr

als

The

web

site

has

bee

n re

desig

ned

and

was

rece

ntly

laun

ched

. It

is us

er fr

iend

ly a

nd re

ceiv

es o

ver 5

0,00

0 w

eb h

its e

ach

year

.

The

clea

ring

hous

e pr

ovid

es a

ccur

ate

listin

g fo

r ava

ilabl

e, a

fford

able

and

ap

prop

riate

hou

sing

(ww

w.c

hirp

la.o

rg)

Reta

in

4.2.

2A. A

war

enes

s of

Sp

ecia

l Nee

ds H

ousin

g (N

eigh

borh

ood

Coun

cils)

“Est

ablis

h ou

trea

ch

curr

icul

um

Purs

ue fu

ndin

g fo

r tr

aini

ng p

rogr

am”

“LA

HSA’

s Em

erge

ncy

Resp

onse

Tea

m (E

RT) i

s co

nsid

ered

one

of t

he le

ad O

utre

ach

Prog

ram

s in

Los

A

ngel

es C

ity a

nd C

ount

y. T

he E

RT p

rovi

des

supp

ort t

o Lo

s A

ngel

es C

ount

y an

d Ci

ty D

epar

tmen

ts a

s w

ell a

s El

ecte

d O

ffici

als

offic

es. L

AHS

A co

ntin

ues

its n

etw

orki

ng w

ith o

ther

ou

trea

ch w

orke

rs c

ount

ywid

e. In

201

1, th

ere

was

a fo

cus

prov

idin

g in

form

atio

n an

d tr

aini

ng o

n Lo

s A

ngel

es C

ount

y De

part

men

t of

Heal

th S

ervi

ces

“Hea

lthy

Way

LA”

Pro

gram

, and

par

ticip

atio

n in

th

e U

nite

d W

ay’s

“Hom

e fo

r Goo

d” O

utre

ach

Prog

ram

s Su

rvey

. LA

HSA

also

ass

ista

nce

and

supp

orte

d lo

cal o

utre

ach

team

s on

co

nduc

ting

spec

ial p

roje

cts.

Thi

s ye

ar, s

peci

al o

utre

ach

proj

ects

in

clud

ed th

e Ha

nsen

Dam

/Sun

land

-Tuj

unga

regi

on, L

AC/U

SC

Med

ical

Cen

ter E

mer

genc

y Ro

om O

utre

ach,

Ven

ice

Beac

h an

d W

estc

hest

er O

utre

ach,

Occ

upy

LA H

omel

ess

Part

icip

ant O

utre

ach,

CE

O/L

ASD

/LA

HSA

Out

reac

h Pr

otoc

ol P

roje

ct, a

nd th

e Sk

id R

ow

Fam

ilies

Out

reac

h Pr

ojec

t. LA

HSA’

s ER

T al

so c

ontin

ues

to w

ork

with

LA

City

Dep

t. of

Pub

lic W

orks

- Bu

reau

of S

tree

t Ser

vice

s In

vest

igat

ion

and

Enfo

rcem

ent D

ivisi

on (S

SIED

) by

prov

idin

g ou

trea

ch

and

notifi

catio

n se

rvic

es to

enc

ampm

ent d

wel

lers

to e

nsur

ing

they

re

ceiv

e as

sista

nce

with

acc

essin

g sh

elte

r and

rela

ted

serv

ices

A lo

t of o

utre

ach

occu

rred

, but

not

ne

cess

arily

tow

ards

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d co

unci

ls,

the

inte

nded

targ

et o

f the

pro

gram

.

Reta

in, b

ut b

road

en p

rogr

am

beyo

nd n

eigh

borh

ood

coun

cils

. Ad

d “N

eigh

borh

ood:

to ti

tle

befo

re “

Awar

enes

s.”

4.2.

2B. H

omel

ess

Nee

ds O

utre

ach

Diss

emin

ate

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

hou

sing

need

s of

sp

ecia

l nee

ds p

opul

atio

ns

to 2

,000

peo

ple

LAHS

A pr

ovid

es in

form

atio

n an

d re

ferr

al s

ervi

ces

to o

ver 2

,500

pe

rson

s pe

r yea

r. Th

is in

clud

es c

alls

rece

ived

for h

omel

ess

assis

tanc

e. T

his

incl

udes

dire

ct re

ques

ts fo

r ass

ista

nce

rece

ived

th

roug

h th

e em

erge

ncy

serv

ices

line

, by

emai

l, an

d by

enc

ount

ers

and

enga

gem

ents

mad

e w

ith h

omel

ess

indi

vidu

als

and

fam

ilies

at

loca

tions

thro

ugho

ut L

os A

ngel

es C

ity a

nd C

ount

y.

Effe

ctiv

eRe

tain

4.2.

3A. T

echn

ical

A

ssis

tanc

e to

Hom

eles

s Ho

usin

g Pr

ovid

ers

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

to 2

0 pr

ovid

ers

annu

ally

Data

not

ava

ilabl

e.Do

es n

ot a

ppea

r to

have

bee

n ef

fect

ive.

No

fund

ing.

Re

mov

e.

4.2.

4A. “

Proj

ect 5

0” P

ilot

Prog

ram

Tar

getin

g th

e Ch

roni

cally

Hom

eles

s

50 lo

ng-t

erm

ch

roni

cally

hom

eles

s in

divi

dual

s ho

used

Proj

ect 5

0 w

as c

ompl

eted

, and

hou

sed

43 o

f the

initi

al 5

0 ch

roni

cally

hom

eles

s in

divi

dual

s th

at w

ere

iden

tified

.Ef

fecc

ctiv

e, h

owev

er th

e pi

lot p

rogr

am h

as e

nded

. Re

mov

e.