Review Hiccups

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Review Hiccups

    1/5

    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 102 (2000) 1317

    Case report

    Persistent hiccup as presenting symptom in medulla oblongatacavernoma: a case report and review of the literature

    Angelo Musumeci *, Luciano Cristofori, Albino Bricolo

    Department of Neurosurgery, Uni6ersity Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy

    Received 22 March 1999; received in revised form 31 August 1999; accepted 31 August 1999

    Abstract

    A rare case of persistent intractable hiccup as presenting symptom of cavernous angioma in the medulla oblongata is reported.

    Pathophysiologic hypotheses about the triggering mechanism of hiccup are discussed, with special reference to the causes affecting

    the central nervous system. A review of the literature concerning medullary lesions presenting with persistent hiccup is also

    reported. Finally we have included some brief considerations about cavernous angiomas and the patterns of their clinical

    presentation, focusing on those located in the medulla oblongata. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Brainstem lesions; Cavernous angioma; Hiccup; Pathophysiology

    www.elsevier.com/locate/clineuro

    1. Introduction

    The etiology of persistent intractable hiccup is ob-

    scure and several hypotheses have so far been proposed

    regarding its pathophysiology. Hiccup is defined in-

    tractable when it persists for 24 h, lasting in some cases

    more than 25 years. Other terms as chronic [1,2],

    persistent [3] and obstinate [4] were used to describe

    such a long duration.

    The afferent pathway of hiccup reflex arc comprises

    the sensory branches of the phrenic and vagus nerves as

    well as dorsal sympathetic fibers; its main efferent limbcausing spasm of the diaphragm is mediated by motor

    fibers of the phrenic nerve [5]. Hiccup may be triggered

    by central nervous system (CNS) lesions or by the

    irritation of the phrenic and vagus nerves [5]. Recently,

    more attention was focused on its central etiology, in

    particular on those lesions located in the brainstem,

    interfering with specific neuronal circuits in the dorso-

    lateral aspect of the medulla oblongata [610].

    2. Case report

    A 46-year-old man complained of some episodes of

    violent vomiting and nausea that remitted sponta-

    neously. After a few days a persistent and intractable

    hiccup occurred and led to severe insomnia and a seven

    pounds weight loss. He was examined in another hospi-

    tal with gastroscopy and thoracic abdominal CT-

    scans. They were normal. CT-scan of the brain showed

    a hyperdense lesion, not enhanced after contrast

    medium infusion, in the medulla oblongata. Two

    months after the onset of the symptoms the patient wasadmitted to our Department and neurological examina-

    tion showed diplopia in upward gaze and persistent

    hiccup refractory to chlorpromazine, metoclopramide

    and cusaprid. MRI of the brain confirmed a well-cir-

    cumscribed dorsal medullary lesion, hyperintense, with

    an isointense nucleus in T1-weighted images, without

    Gadolinium-enhancement, beneath the caudal floor of

    the fourth ventricle (Fig. 1). A cavernous angioma was

    suspected.

    The patient was operated on by the senior author

    (AB), in a semi-sitting position. Suboccipital median

    craniectomy and C1-laminectomy were carried out. Thedura was opened in a Y-shaped fashion, the cerebellar

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-045-8072695; fax: +39-045-

    916790.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Musumeci)

    0303-8467/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    PII: S 0 3 0 3 - 8 4 6 7 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 5 8 - X

  • 7/28/2019 Review Hiccups

    2/5

    A. Musumeci et al. /Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 102 (2000) 131714

    tonsils were gently retracted laterally and the floor of

    the fourth ventricle was exposed. A red mulberry-like

    cavernous angioma was raised from the obex, at the

    right side of calamus scriptorius, exophytic in the lower

    third of the fourth ventricle (Fig. 2a). It was easily

    reduced and radically removed including its gliotic-

    haemosiderin wall (Fig. 2b), avoiding rough traction to

    the brainstem. Bleeding was slight and there were no

    abnormalities in respiration and blood pressure, al-

    though severe bradycardia was observed transientlyduring the debulking of the mass. Interrupted suturing

    was used for a watertight closure of the dura. The

    muscles and skin flap were closed in the usual manner.

    Hiccup resolved from the day after surgery and the

    patient no longer complained of diplopia in the upward

    gaze. At discharge neurologic examination was normal.

    Pathology confirmed the lesion as a cavernous an-

    gioma. After 1 year the patient was hiccup free.

    3. Discussion

    Hiccup or singultus is a repeated, myoclonic, syn-

    chronous and involuntary contraction of the di-

    aphragm. Inspiratory (external) intercostal muscle

    contractions are followed (in 35 ms) by a sudden clo-

    sure of the glottis, stopping the air exchange abruptly

    and producing the typical hic [11,12].

    Etiology of persistent hiccup is still unknown and

    several folk [1315], pharmacological [1625], not in-

    vasive [2628] and extremely invasive [2932] therapeu-

    tic remedies were tried.

    Generally the causes of hiccup could be divided into

    peripheral and central. Peripheral is any factor out-

    side the CNS that may produce afferent nerve impulses

    which finally reach the phrenic motor fibers. Central

    are all those causes which act directly upon the CNS to

    stimulate the phrenic motor fibers [33].

    Hiccup was considered a gastrointenstinal reflex [12]

    whose center should be located in the spinal cord at the

    cervical-thoracic level. However, a well-coordinated

    contraction suggests the relay by a supraspinal polysy-

    naptic center of coordination.

    Hassler [34] thought that hiccup could be the subcor-

    tical equivalent of myoclonus possibly generated at the

    level of the ponto-medullary so-called myoclonic trian-

    gle of GuillanMollaret: inferior olive, dentate nucleus,

    red nucleus. Other authors [35 38] developed, for

    palatal myoclonus, the concept of denervation super-

    sensitivity caused by a disfunction of the inferior oli-

    vary complex, nucleus ambiguous and adjacent

    postero-lateral reticular formation of medulla oblon-

    gata due to medullary lesions. Al Deeb et al. [6] and Dela Fuente-Fernandez [8] proposed a similar genesis for

    the hiccup.

    Few reports exist in the literature regarding persistent

    intractable hiccup due to lesions located in the medulla

    oblongata [1,6,7,9,10,3943]. Fisher et al. [40], in 1961,

    and other authors [6,7] more recently, reported dorsal

    and lateral medullary infarctions presenting with persis-

    tent hiccup. Kumral and Acarer [42] described an un-

    usual case of primary medullary haemorrhage with

    intractable hiccup. Vascular anomalies with neurovas-

    Fig. 1. Preoperative MRI. T1-weighted images on the sagittal (left) and axial (right) planes showing a well-circumscribed bleeding lesion in the

    dorsal aspect of the medulla oblongata, beneath the caudal floor of the fourth ventricle.

  • 7/28/2019 Review Hiccups

    3/5

    A. Musumeci et al. /Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 102 (2000) 1317 15

    Fig. 2. (a) Intraoperative photograph. Medullary cavernous angioma

    dorsally exophytic from the obex in the fourth ventricle. (b) Intraop-

    erative photograph. The floor of the fourth ventricle after total

    removal of cavernous angioma.

    tractable hiccup elicited by brainstem tumours:

    low-grade gliomas [39,43], ependymoma [1], choroid

    plexus papillomas of the fourth ventricle [7,9] and

    tuberculomas [6] were reported. In all cases the lesions

    developed slowly and were located near the dorso-lat-

    eral aspect of the medulla oblongata. Among them, in

    four cases [1,6,39,43] an involvement or extension to

    the region of the obex was documented.

    We report a rare case of persistent intractable hiccup

    as the presenting symptom of a cavernous angioma

    located near the obex of the medulla oblongata, dor-

    sally exophytic in the fourth ventricle.

    Houtteville (personal communication, 1998) showed

    a similar clinical onset for a cavernous angioma associ-

    ated with a venous angioma at the ponto-medullary

    junction. Porter et al. [44], in their recent review of 100

    brainstem cavernous malformations, reported hiccup as

    the presenting symptom in three cases, but they did not

    provide the exact location in the brainstem of the

    cavernomas nor a pathophysiological explanation of

    hiccup.

    Moreover, cavernous angiomas were associated with

    other movement disorders. Akbostanci et al. [45] de-

    scribed a case of hemidystonia, reviewing 11 previous

    cases of other movement disorders. Five cavernous

    angiomas were located in the brainstem, one of which

    was beneath the floor of the fourth ventricle: this case

    was associated with oculopalatal myoclonus and syn-

    chronous movements of the face, jaw, tongue and the

    diaphragm.

    Cavernous angioma is a hamartomatous berry-like

    collection of vascular spaces lined by thin walls devoid

    of smooth muscle [4648]. No brain tissue intervenes

    between these vascular channels. Surrounding neural

    tissue is often gliotic and haemosiderin-stained, and

    may contain small low-flow feeding arteries and drain-

    ing veins [45,46,49]. Cavernous angiomas are properly

    vascular malformations but in the brainstem they were

    considered vascular tumours [50] because they represent

    real mass-lesions [5055]. Most frequently clinical pre-

    sentations of intracranial cavernomas are seizures, focal

    neurological deficits, and haemorrhages [51 56]. Re-

    garding brainstem cavernous angiomas, long-tract signsor cranial nerves deficits are due to mass effect in such

    densely eloquent area [53,55,57 59]. The symptoms

    described for medullary cavernous angiomas, are

    headache, diplopia, truncal ataxia, paresis of facial

    nerve, weakness of arms and/or legs, dysphagia, numb-

    ness of the face or body, dizziness, nausea and vomiting

    [50,5457,5961] but hiccup has rarely been reported.

    According to previous pathophysiologic consider-

    ations, we believe that the slow growth of the cavernous

    angioma, in the dorso-lateral aspect of the medulla

    oblongata, in our case caused the irritation of the

    cular contacts determining persistent hiccups were ad-

    vocated [9,10,41]. Most reports describe persistent in-

  • 7/28/2019 Review Hiccups

    4/5

    A. Musumeci et al. /Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 102 (2000) 131716

    centrally mediated pathways for hiccup which remained

    primarily for such a long time prior to the development

    of localizing neurological signs. Experimental studies of

    electrical stimulation in medulla oblongata of cats

    [62,63] showed that the sites where the hiccup-like

    responses are generated are located in the medullary

    reticular formation lateral to the nucleus ambiguous, at

    the rostrocaudal level between 1 and 2.5 mm rostral to

    the obex. Moreover it was demonstrated that the nu-

    cleus raphe magnus have GABA-containing cells and itcould be the source of the GABAergic inhibitory inputs

    to the hiccups reflex arc. Thus we hypothesize that the

    cavernoma in our case was most likely to interfere with

    the neuronal connections between the nucleus raphe

    magnus and those hiccup-evoking sites near the obex,

    which could discharge when released from the higher

    inhibitory control.

    4. Conclusion

    This case illustrates a very unusual presentation of

    brainstem lesions and makes this etiology one of the

    important considerations in the differential diagnosis of

    persistent intractable hiccup. When neurological exami-

    nation is normal, the diagnosis is easily missed. The

    patient undergoes a large series of radiological exami-

    nations of the gastrointestinal tract and is treated use-

    lessly with a lot of palliative drugs or extremely invasive

    remedies, like ablative procedures of the phrenic nerve.

    However, when persistent intractable hiccup occurs

    with or without a slow neurological worsening, a brain-stem lesion should be suspected. MR-imaging is

    mandatory. Diagnosis of benign brainstem tumour

    brings seriously surgery into the available treatments.

    References

    [1] Kozik M, Owsianowska L. Persistent hiccoughs as the predomi-

    nant symptom with a tumour of the medulla oblongata. J Neurol

    1976;212:913.

    [2] Mc Farling DA, Susac JO. Hoquet diabolique: intractable hic-

    cups as a manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Neurology1979;29:797801.

    [3] Jansen PHP, Joosten EMG, Vingerhoets HM. Persistent periodic

    hiccup following brain abscess: a case report. J Neurol Neuro-

    surg Psychiatry 1990;53:834.

    [4] Bellingham Smith E. The significance and treatment of obstinate

    hiccough. Practitioner 1938;140:16671.

    [5] Fodstad H, Nilsson S. Intractable singultus: a diagnostic and

    therapeutic challenge. Br J Neurosurg 1993;7:25562.

    [6] Al Deeb SM, Sharif H, Al Moutaery K, Biary N. Intractable

    hiccup induced by brainstem lesion. J Neurol Sci

    1991;103(2):14450.

    [7] Chang YY, Chen WH, Liu JS, Shih PY, Chen SS. Intractable

    hiccup caused by medulla oblongata lesions. J Formos Med

    Assoc 1993;92(10):926 8.

    [8] De la Fuente-Fernandez R. Hiccup and dysfunction of the

    inferior olivary complex. Med Clin (Barc) 1998;110(1):224.

    [9] Marsot-Dupuch K, Bousson V, Cabane J, Tubiana JM. In-

    tractable hiccups: the role of cerebral MR in cases without

    systemic cause. Am J Neurol Res 1995;16(10):2093100.

    [10] Ward BA, Smith RR. Hiccups and brainstem compression. J

    Neuroimaging 1994;4(3):1645.

    [11] Efrati P. Obstinate hiccup as the prodromal symptom in thoracic

    herpes zoster; prompt care after injection of largactil. Neurology

    1956;6:6012.

    [12] Newsom Davis J. An experimental study of hiccup. Brain

    1970;93:85172.

    [13] Engleman EG, Lankton J, Lankton B. Granulated sugar as a

    treatment for hiccups in conscious patients. New Engl J Med

    1971;285:1489.

    [14] Lux G. Leitsymptom: hiccup. Dtsch A8 rztebl 1985;82:1429 33.

    [15] Saitto C, Grisina G, Cosmi EV. Treatment of hiccups by contin-

    uous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in anesthetized subjects.

    Anesthesiology 1982;57(4):345.

    [16] Bhalotra R. Baclofen therapy for intractable hiccoughs. J Clin

    Gastroenterol 1990;12(1):122.

    [17] Burke AM, White AB, Brill N. Baclofen for intractable hiccups.

    New Engl J Med 1988;319:1354.

    [18] Jacobson PL, Messenheimer T, Farmer W. Treatment of in-

    tractable hiccups with valproic acid. Neurology1981;31(11):145860.

    [19] Lance J, Bassil GT. Familial intractable hiccup relieved by

    baclofen. Lancet 1989;8657:2767.

    [20] Lipps DC, Jabbari B, Mitchell MH, Daigh JDJ. Nifedipine for

    intractable hiccup. Neurology 1990;40:5312.

    [21] Mukhopadhyay P, Osman MR, Wajima F, Wallace TJ. Nifedip-

    ine for intractable hiccups. New Engl J Med 1986;314:1256.

    [22] Ramirez FC, Graham DY. Treatment of intractable hiccup with

    baclofen: results of a double-blind randomized, controlled cross-

    over study. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:178991.

    [23] Stalnikowicz R, Fich A, Troudart T. Amytriptilina for in-

    tractable hiccups. New Engl J Med 1986;313:645.

    [24] Williamson BWA, Macintyre IMC. Management of intractable

    hiccup. Br Med J 1977;2:5013.

    [25] Yaqoob M, Prabhu P, Ahmad R. Baclofen for intractable

    hiccups. Lancet 1989;8662:5623.

    [26] Aravot DJ, Wright G, Rees A, Maiwand OM, Garland MH.

    Non invasive phrenic nerve stimulation for intractable hiccup.

    Lancet 1989;28(2(8670)):1047.

    [27] Odeh M, Bassan H, Oliven A. Termination of intractable hic-

    cups with rectal massage. J Intern Med 1990;272:1456.

    [28] Salem MR, Baraka A, Rattemborg CC, Holady DA. Treatment

    of hiccups by pharingeal stimulation in anesthetized and con-

    scious subjects. J Am Med Assoc 1967;202:12630.

    [29] Angle LW. Bilateral phrenicectomy in the treatment of persistent

    hiccups. South Med J 1932;25:10123.

    [30] Campbell MF. Malignant hiccup. With report of a case follow-ing transurethral prostatic resection and requiring bilateral

    phenicectomy for cure. Am J Surg 1940;48:44955.

    [31] Sato S, Asakura N, Endo T, Naito H. Cervical epidural block

    can relieve postoperative intractable hiccups. Anesthesiology

    1993;78:11846.

    [32] Slemmer RF. Phrenic nerve traction for persistent hiccough

    (singultus): a preliminary report. Arch Surg 1955;71:9278.

    [33] Gigot AF, Flynn PD. Treatment of hiccups. J Am Med Assoc

    1952;150:7604.

    [34] Hassler R. Die neuronalen Systeme der extrapyramidalen Myo-

    clonien und deren stereotaktische Behandlung. In: Doose H,

    editor. Aktuelle Neuropadiatrie. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1977:20 46.

    [35] Kane SA, Thach WT. Palatal myoclonus and function of the

    inferior olive: are they related? Exp Br Res, 1988;Suppl 11.

  • 7/28/2019 Review Hiccups

    5/5

    A. Musumeci et al. /Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 102 (2000) 1317 17

    [36] Lapresle J, Hamida MB. The dentato olivary pathway. Arch

    Neurol 1970;22:135 43.

    [37] Matsuo F, Ajax ET. Palatal myoclonus and denervation super-

    sensitivity in the central nervous system. Ann Neurol 1979;5:72

    8.

    [38] Turazzi S, Alexandre A, Bricolo A, Rizzuto N. Opsoclonus and

    palatal myoclonus during prolonged post-traumatic coma. A

    clinico-pathologic study. Eur Neurol 1977;15(5):25763.

    [39] Fisher AQ, Mc Lean WT. Intractable hiccups as presenting

    symptom of brainstem tumor in children. Childs Brain

    1982;9:603.

    [40] Fisher CM, Karnes WE, Kubik CS. Lateral medullary infarc-

    tion. The pattern of vascular occlusion. J Neuropath Exp Neurol

    1961;20:32379.

    [41] Johnson DL. Intractable hiccups: treatment by neurovascular

    decompression of the vagus nerve. J Neurosurg 1993;78:8136.

    [42] Kumral E, Acarer A. Primary medullary haemorrhage with

    intractable hiccup. J Neurol 1998;245(9):6202.

    [43] Stotka UL, Barcay SJ, Bell HS, Clare FB. Intractable hiccough

    as the primary manifestation of brain stem tumor. Am J Med

    1962;32:3135.

    [44] Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, et al. Cavernous malfor-

    mations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. J Neuro-

    surg 1999;90:508.

    [45] Akbostanci MC, Yigit A, Ulcatan S. Cavernous angioma pre-

    senting with hemidystonia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg

    1998;100:2347.

    [46] Jellinger K. Vascular malformations of the central nervous sys-

    tem: a morfological overview. Neurosurg Rev 1986;9:177216.

    [47] Rigamonti D, Spetzler RF, Johnson PC, et al. Cerebral vascular

    malformations. BNI Q 1987;3:1827.

    [48] Russel DS, Rubistein LJ. Pathology of Tumours of the Nervous

    System. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1997:11645.

    [49] Little JR, Awad IA, Jones SC, et al. Vascular pressures and

    cortical blood flow in cavernous angioma of the brain. J Neuro-

    surg 1990;73:5559.

    [50] Bricolo A, Turazzi S. Surgery for gliomas and other mass lesions

    of the brainstem. In: Symon L, Calliaw L, Cohadon F, et al.,

    editors. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol.22. New York: Springer, 1995:261341.

    [51] Curling OD, Kelly DL, Elster AD, Craven TE. An analysis of

    the natural history of cavernous angiomas. J Neurosurg

    1991;75:7025.

    [52] Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR. Natural history of the

    cavernous angioma. J Neurosurg 1991;75:70914.

    [53] Simard JM, Garcia-Bengoechea F, Ballinger WE, Mickle JP,

    Ousling RG. Cavernous angioma: review of 126 collected and 12

    new clinical cases. Neurosurgery 1986;18:16272.

    [54] Symon L, Jackowski A, Bills D. Surgical treatment of pon-

    tomedullary cavernomas. Br J Neurosurg 1991;5:33947.

    [55] Vaquero J, Salazar J, Martinez R, Martinez P, Brand G. Caver-nomas of the central nervous system: clinical syndromes, CT

    scan diagnosis, and prognosis after surgical treatment in 25

    cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987;85:2933.

    [56] Yamasaki T, Handa H, Yamashita J, et al. Intracranial and

    orbital cavernous angiomas: a review of 30 cases. J Neurosurg

    1986;64:197208.

    [57] Fritschi JA, Reulen HJ, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM. Cavernous

    malformation of the brain stem. A review of 139 cases. Acta

    Neurochir (Wien) 1994;130:35 46.

    [58] Houtteville JP. The surgery of cavernomas both supra-tentorial

    and infra-tentorial. In: Symon L, Calliaw L, Cohadon F, et al.,

    editors. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol.

    22. New York: Springer, 1995:185259.

    [59] Zimmerman RS, Spetzler RF, Stuart Lee K, Zabramski JM,Hargraves RW. Cavernous malformations of the brain stem. J

    Neurosurg 1991;75:32 9.

    [60] Falbusch R, Strauss C, Huk W, Rocklein G, Kompf D,

    Ruprecht KW. Surgical removal of ponto mesencephalic cav-

    ernous hemangiomas. Neurosurgery 1990;26:44957.

    [61] Kashiwagi S, Van Loveren HR, Tew JM, Wiot JG, Weil SM,

    Lukin RA. Diagnosis and treatment of vascular brain stem

    malformations. J Neurosurg 1990;72:27 34.

    [62] Arita H, Oshima T, Kita I, Sakamoto M. Generation of hiccup

    by electrical stimulation in medulle of cats. Neurosci Lett

    1994;175(1-2):6770.

    [63] Oshima T, Sakamoto M, Tatsuta H, Arita H. GABAergic

    inhibition of hiccup-like reflex induced by electrical stimulationin medulla of cats. Neurosci Res 1998;30(4):28793.

    .