54
Results from Results from Three-Year WMAP Three-Year WMAP Observations Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Aus Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Aus tin) tin) TeV II Particle Astrophy TeV II Particle Astrophy sics sics August 29, 2006 August 29, 2006

Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Results from Three-Results from Three-Year WMAP Year WMAP

ObservationsObservations

Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin)Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin)TeV II Particle AstrophysicsTeV II Particle Astrophysics

August 29, 2006August 29, 2006

Page 2: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Why Care About WMAP?Why Care About WMAP?• WMAP observes CMB. This is a conference about “Te

V” particle astrophysics. Why care about CMB? – The present-day temperature of CMB is 2.725K, or 2.35 m

eV.– The temperature at decoupling (where the most of CMB is

coming from) was ~3000K, or 0.26 eV. – The temperature at matter-radiation equality was ~9000K,

or 0.8 eV. • CMB is a nuisance for many particle astrophysicists:

it attenuates cosmic-ray particles traveling through the universe. (GZK)

• Why am I here?

Page 3: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What Can CMB Offer?What Can CMB Offer?• Baryon-to-photon ratio in the universe

– Sound speed and inertia of baryon-photon fluid• Matter-to-radiation ratio in the universe

– Dark matter abundance– “Radiation” may include photons, neutrinos as well as any other relativi

stic components.• Angular diameter distance to decoupling surface

– Peak position in l space ~ (Sound horizon)/(Angular Diameter Distance) • Time dependence of gravitational potential

– Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect, Dark energy• Primordial power spectrum (Scalar+Tensor)

– Constraints on inflationary models• Optical depth

– Cosmic reionization

Page 4: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Full Sky Microwave MapFull Sky Microwave Map

COBE/FIRAS: T=2.725 K

Uniform, “Fossil” Light from the Big Bang

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Page 5: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

COBE/FIRAS, 1990COBE/FIRAS, 1990Perfect blackbody = Thermal equilibrium = Big Bang

Page 6: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

COBE/DMR, 1992COBE/DMR, 1992

Gravity is STRONGER in cold spots: T/T~

Page 7: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

The Wilkinson Microwave The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy ProbeAnisotropy Probe

• A microwave satellite working at L2• Five frequency bands

– K (22GHz), Ka (33GHz), Q (41GHz), V (61GHz), W (94GHz)

• The Key Feature: Differential Measurement– The technique inherited from COBE– 10 “Differencing Assemblies” (DAs)– K1, Ka1, Q1, Q2, V1, V2, W1, W2, W3, & W4, each consisting of

two radiometers that are sensitive to orthogonal linear polarization modes.

• Temperature anisotropy is measured by single difference.

• Polarization anisotropy is measured by double difference.

Page 8: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

K band (22GHz)K band (22GHz)

Page 9: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Ka Band (33GHz)Ka Band (33GHz)

Page 10: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Q Band (41GHz)Q Band (41GHz)

Page 11: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

V Band (61GHz)V Band (61GHz)

Page 12: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

W Band (94GHz)W Band (94GHz)

Page 13: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

The Angular Power SpectrumThe Angular Power Spectrum• CMB temperature anisotropy is very close to

Gaussian; thus, its spherical harmonic transform, alm, is also Gaussian.

• Since alm is Gaussian, the power spectrum:

completely specifies statistical properties of CMB.

*lmlml aaC

Page 14: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

WMAP 3-yr Power SpectrumWMAP 3-yr Power Spectrum

Page 15: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Physics of CMB AnisotropyPhysics of CMB Anisotropy

• SOLVE GENERAL RELATIVISTIC BOLTZMANN SOLVE GENERAL RELATIVISTIC BOLTZMANN EQUATIONS TO THE FIRST ORDER IN EQUATIONS TO THE FIRST ORDER IN PERTURBATIONSPERTURBATIONS

Page 16: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Use temperature fluctuations, =T/T, instead of f:

Expand the Boltzmann equation to the first order in perturbations:

where

describes the Sachs-Wolfe effect: purely GR fluctuations.

Page 17: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

For metric perturbations in the form of:

ds2 a2 1 h00 d 2 ij hij dx idx j the Sachs-Wolfe terms are given by

where is the directional cosine of photon propagations.

Newtonian potential Curvature perturbations

1. The 1st term = gravitational redshift

2. The 2nd term = integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

h00/2

hij/2

(higher T)

Page 18: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

• When coupling is strong, photons and baryons move together and behave as a perfect fluid.

• When coupling becomes less strong, the photon-baryon fluid acquires shear viscosity.

• So, the problem can be formulated as “hydrodynamics”. (c.f. The Sachs-Wolfe effect was pure GR.)

Small-scale Anisotropy (<2 deg)Small-scale Anisotropy (<2 deg)

Collision term describing coupling between photons and baryons via electron scattering.

Page 19: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Boltzmann Equation to HydrodBoltzmann Equation to Hydrodynamicsynamics

Monopole: Energy density

Dipole: Velocity

Quadrupole: Stress

• Multipole expansion

• Energy density, Velocity, Stress

Page 20: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Photon Transport EquationsPhoton Transport Equations

f2=9/10 (no polarization), 3/4 (with polarization)

A = -h00/2, H = hii/2

C=Thomson scattering optical depth

CONTINUITY

EULER

Photon-baryon coupling

Page 21: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Baryon TransportBaryon Transport

Cold Dark Matter

Page 22: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

The Strong Coupling RegimeThe Strong Coupling Regime

SOUND WAVE!

Page 23: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

The Wave Form Tells Us The Wave Form Tells Us Cosmological ParametersCosmological Parameters

Higher baryon density

Lower sound speed

Compress more

Higher peaks at compression phase (even peaks)

Page 24: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What CMB MeasuresWhat CMB MeasuresA

mpl

itud

e of

tem

pera

ture

flu

ctua

tion

s at

a g

iven

sca

le, l

400 80020040 10010Multipole moment l~ Small scalesLarge scales

Ang.Diam. Distance

Baryon-to-photon Ratio

Mat-to-Radiation Ratio

ISW

Page 25: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

CMB to ParametersCMB to Parameters

Page 26: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Measuring Matter-Radiation RatioMeasuring Matter-Radiation Ratio

where is the directional cosine of photon propagations.

1. The 1st term = gravitational redshift

2. The 2nd term = integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

h00/2

hij/2

(higher T)

During the radiation dominated epoch, even CDM fluctuations cannot grow (the expansion of the Universe is too fast); thus, dark matter potential gets shallower and shallower as the Universe expands --> potential decay --> ISW --> Boost Cl.

Page 27: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Matter-Radiation RatioMatter-Radiation Ratio

• More extra radiation component means that the equality happens later.• Since gravitational potential decays during the radiation era (free-fall

time scale is longer than the expansion time scale during the radiation era), ISW effect increases anisotropy at around the Horizon size at the equality.

Page 28: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

How Many (Effective) Neutrinos?How Many (Effective) Neutrinos?

Page 29: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

So, It’s Been Three Years Since So, It’s Been Three Years Since The First Data Release. What Is The First Data Release. What Is

New Now?New Now?

Page 30: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

POLARIZATION DATA!!POLARIZATION DATA!!

Page 31: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

K Band (23 GHz)K Band (23 GHz)Dominated by synchrotron; Note that polarization direction is perpendicular to the magnetic field lines.

Page 32: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Ka Band (33 GHz)Ka Band (33 GHz)Synchrotron decreases as -3.2 from K to Ka band.

Page 33: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Q Band (41 GHz)Q Band (41 GHz)We still see significant polarized synchrotron in Q.

Page 34: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

V Band (61 GHz)V Band (61 GHz)The polarized foreground emission is also smallest in V band. We can also see that noise is larger on the ecliptic plane.

Page 35: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

W Band (94 GHz)W Band (94 GHz)While synchrotron is the smallest in W, polarized dust (hard to see by eyes) may contaminate in W band more than in V band.

Page 36: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Polarized Light Filtered

Polarized Light Un-filtered

Page 37: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Jargon: E-mode and B-modeJargon: E-mode and B-mode• Polarization is a rank-2 tensor field.• One can decompose it into a divergence-like

“E-mode” and a vorticity-like “B-mode”.

E-mode B-mode

Seljak & Zaldarriaga (1997); Kamionkowski, Kosowsky, Stebbins (1997)

Page 38: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Physics of CMB PolarizationPhysics of CMB Polarization• Thomson scattering generates polarization, if…

– Temperature quadrupole exists around an electron– Where does quadrupole come from?

• Quadrupole is generated by shear viscosity of photon-baryon fluid, which is generated by velocity gradient.

electronisotropic

anisotropic

no net polarization

net polarization

Page 39: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Boltzmann EquationBoltzmann Equation

• Temperature anisotropy, , can be generated by gravitational effect (noted as “SW” = Sachs-Wolfe)

• Linear polarization (Q & U) is generated only by scattering (noted as “C” = Compton scattering).

• Circular polarization (V) would not be generated. (Next slide.)

Page 40: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Primordial Gravity WavesPrimordial Gravity Waves• Gravity waves create quadrupolar temperatu

re anisotropy -> Polarization• Directly generate polarization without kV.• Most importantly, GW creates B mode.

Page 41: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Power SpectrumPower SpectrumScalar T

Tensor T

Scalar E

Tensor E

Tensor B

Page 42: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Polarization From ReionizatioPolarization From Reionizationn

• CMB was emitted at z~1088.• Some fraction of CMB was re-scattered in a reionized u

niverse.• The reionization redshift of ~11 would correspond to 3

65 million years after the Big-Bang.

z=1088, ~ 1

z~ 11, ~0.1

First-star formation

z=0

IONIZED

REIONIZED

NEUTRAL

Page 43: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Measuring Optical DepthMeasuring Optical Depth• Since polarization is generated by scattering, the

amplitude is given by the number of scattering, or optical depth of Thomson scattering:

which is related to the electron column number density as

Ne =

Page 44: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Polarization from ReioniazationPolarization from Reioniazation

“Reionization Bump”

Page 45: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

• Outside P06– EE (solid)– BB (dashed)

• Black lines– Theory EE

• tau=0.09– Theory BB

• r=0.3

• Frequency = Geometric mean of two frequencies used to compute Cl

Masking Is Not Enough: Masking Is Not Enough: Foreground Must Be CleanedForeground Must Be Cleaned

Rough fit to BB FG in 60GHz

Page 46: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Clean FGClean FG

•Only two-parameter fit!

•Dramatic improvement in chi-squared.

•The cleaned Q and V maps have the reduced chi-squared of ~1.02 per DOF=4534 (outside P06)

Page 47: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

BB consistent with zero after FG removal.

3-sigma detection of EE.

The “Gold” multipoles: l=3,4,5,6.

Page 48: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Parameter Determination: Parameter Determination: First Year vs Three YearsFirst Year vs Three Years

• The simplest LCDM model fits the data very well.– A power-law primordial power spectrum– Three relativistic neutrino species– Flat universe with cosmological constant

• The maximum likelihood values very consistent– Matter density and sigma8 went down slightly

Page 49: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What Should WMAP Say What Should WMAP Say About Flatness?About Flatness?

Flatness, or very low Hubble’s constant?

If H=30km/s/Mpc, a closed universe with Omega=1.3 w/o cosmological constant still fits the WMAP data.

Page 50: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

Constraints on GWConstraints on GW• Our ability to

constrain the amplitude of gravity waves is still coming mostly from the temperature spectrum.– r<0.55 (95%)

• The B-mode spectrum adds very little.

• WMAP would have to integrate for at least 15 years to detect the B-mode spectrum from inflation.

Page 51: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What Should WMAP Say What Should WMAP Say About Inflation Models?About Inflation Models?

Hint for ns<1

Zero GW The 1-d marginalized constraint from WMAP alone is ns=0.95+-0.02.

GW>0The 2-d joint constraint still allows for ns=1 (HZ).

Page 52: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What Should WMAP Say What Should WMAP Say About Dark Energy?About Dark Energy?

Not much!

The CMB data alone cannot constrain w very well. Combining the large-scale structure data or supernova data breaks degeneracy between w and matter density.

Page 53: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

What Should WMAP Say What Should WMAP Say About Neutrino Properties?About Neutrino Properties?

3.04)

Page 54: Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006

• Understanding of– Noise,– Systematics,– Foreground, and

• Analysis techniques • have significantly improved

from the first-year release.

• A simple LCDM model fits both the temperature and polarization data very well.

• CMB offers constraints on:

• Neutrino properties: the number of species and mass

• Dark matter abundance

• Dark matter abundance and properties

• Inflationary models (flatness and spectral index)

• Reionization of the universe

• We are now working on the 5-year data…

SummarySummary