7
Thorax 1996;51:126-131 Resting energy expenditure and oxygen cost of breathing in patients with cystic fibrosis S C Bell, M J Saunders, J S Elbom, D J Shale Abstract Background - Resting energy expenditure (REE) is often increased and may con- tribute towards energy imbalance in patients with cystic fibrosis. Several mechanisms may lead to increased REE including the gene defect, the effect of chronic infection, and abnormal pul- monary mechanics. Increased oxygen cost of breathing (OCB) has been dem- onstrated in patients with chronic ob- structive pulmonary disease (COPD), but has not been the subject of extensive study in cystic fibrosis. Methods - Ten clinically stable patients with cystic fibrosis and 10 healthy control subjects were studied. OCB was estimated using the dead space hyperventilation method. Mixed expired gas fractions were measured by online gas analysers and ventilation by a pneumotachograph. After measurement of resting ventilation and gas exchange, minute ventilation (VE) was stimulated by 6-10 I/min by the addition of a dead space and OCB calculated from the slope of the differences in oxygen uptake (VO2) and VE. REE and the non-res- piratory component of REE were cal- culated from gas exchange data. To assess the repeatability of OCB all subjects had a further study performed one week later. Results - The patients had lower weight, fat free mass (FFM), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEVy), forced vital capacity (FVC), and transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TLCO) than controls. Resting respiratory rate, VE, and oxygen uptake per kilogram of FFM (Vo2/kg FFM) were higher in patients (20 (7), 10-4 (1.4) 1/ min and 55 (0.8) mllkg FFM/min) than in controls (13 (4), 7 0 (1-2), and 4*2 (0.5), respectively.) The error standard de- viation for replicate measures of OCB was 0.5 ml O21 VE in controls and 0-8 ml 021 VE in patients with coefficients ofvariation of 24% in controls and 28% in patients. The mean OCB in patients was 2-9 (1-4) ml 02/ VE and 2-1 (0.7) ml o21 VE in controls. OCB, expressed as mlimin (Vo2resp) was 28-5 (11-7) in patients and 14-0 (3.6) in controls. REE was higher in patients (125 9 (14.0)% predicted) than in controls (99.0 (9-4)%). The estimated non-respiratory component of REE was 112-1 (14.9)% for patients and 93-0 (10-0)% for controls. Conclusions - In clinically stable patients with cystic fibrosis the OCB at rest is in- creased but is not the sole explanation for increased metabolic rate. This contrasts with the finding in COPD where the in- crease in REE is largely explained by in- creased OCB. This study also showed poor repeatability and OCB measurements similar to earlier studies, which indicates that the technique is not suitable for lon- gitudinal studies. (Thorax 1996;51:126-131) Keywords: cystic fibrosis, resting energy expenditure, oxygen cost of breathing. Low body weight is common in cystic fibrosis and is related to inadequate energy intake, nutrient malabsorption, and excessive energy expenditure. Resting energy expenditure (REE), an estimate of basal metabolic rate, is 10-20% greater than in healthy subjects and may contribute to energy imbalance.' 2 At least three mechanisms - the gene defect, the consequences of chronic pulmonary in- fection, and altered lung mechanics - could contribute to increased basal metabolic rate in cystic fibrosis. Cultured epithelial and con- nective tissue cell lines with a cystic fibrosis genotype have greater oxygen demands than non-cystic fibrosis cells.34 The increased energy expenditure in infants with cystic fibrosis may be related to the gene defect, but there is conflicting evidence relating the raised REE to genotype and lung disease.256 The cystic fibrosis genotype is unlikely to account for all the increase of REE in patients with established lung disease, particularly that characterised by chronic bacterial infection and an intense inflammatory response associated with airways and parenchymal damage. Bron- chial sepsis leads to local release of leukotrienes, free oxygen radicals, and cytokines including tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFoc) and the interleukins IL-1 ,B and IL-8.7`'° Circulating TNFoc levels in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic pulmonary infection have been associated with an increased REE." Continuous injury to the lungs leads to pro- gressive parenchymal fibrosis and airway ob- struction resulting in abnormal lung mechanics with probable increased oxygen cost and work of breathing. This is supported by the inverse relationship between increased REE and the severity of airways obstruction in cystic fibrosis."2 Increased oxygen consumption by respiratory muscles occurs in chronic ob- Section of Respiratory Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine S C Bell J S Elborn D J Shale Respiratory Function Laboratory M J Saunders Llandough Hospital NHS Trust, Penarth, South Glamorgan CF64 2XX, UK Correspondence to: Dr S C Bell, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, St Vincents Hospital, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia 2010. Received 2 March 1995 Returned to authors 9 May 1995 Revised version received 30 June 1995 Accepted for publication 3 October 1995 126 group.bmj.com on July 14, 2011 - Published by thorax.bmj.com Downloaded from

Resting energy expenditure and oxygen breathing in patients ......Resting energy expenditure andoxygen cost of breathing in patients with cystic fibrosis S CBell, MJ Saunders, J S

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Thorax 1996;51:126-131

    Resting energy expenditure and oxygen cost ofbreathing in patients with cystic fibrosis

    S C Bell, M J Saunders, J S Elbom, D J Shale

    AbstractBackground - Resting energy expenditure(REE) is often increased and may con-tribute towards energy imbalance inpatients with cystic fibrosis. Severalmechanisms may lead to increased REEincluding the gene defect, the effect ofchronic infection, and abnormal pul-monary mechanics. Increased oxygen costof breathing (OCB) has been dem-onstrated in patients with chronic ob-structive pulmonary disease (COPD), buthas not been the subject of extensive studyin cystic fibrosis.Methods - Ten clinically stable patientswith cystic fibrosis and 10 healthy controlsubjects were studied. OCB was estimatedusing the dead space hyperventilationmethod. Mixed expired gas fractions weremeasured by online gas analysers andventilation by a pneumotachograph. Aftermeasurement of resting ventilation andgas exchange, minute ventilation (VE) wasstimulated by 6-10 I/min by the addition ofa dead space and OCB calculated from theslope of the differences in oxygen uptake(VO2) and VE. REE and the non-res-piratory component of REE were cal-culated from gas exchange data. To assessthe repeatability of OCB all subjects hada further study performed one week later.Results - The patients had lower weight,fat free mass (FFM), forced expiratoryvolume in one second (FEVy), forced vitalcapacity (FVC), and transfer factor forcarbon monoxide (TLCO) than controls.Resting respiratory rate, VE, and oxygenuptake per kilogram ofFFM (Vo2/kg FFM)were higher in patients (20 (7), 10-4 (1.4)1/min and 5 5 (0.8) mllkg FFM/min) than incontrols (13 (4), 7 0 (1-2), and 4*2 (0.5),respectively.) The error standard de-viation for replicate measures ofOCB was0.5 ml O21 VE in controls and 0-8 ml 021VE in patients with coefficients ofvariationof 24% in controls and 28% in patients.The mean OCB in patients was 2-9 (1-4) ml02/ VE and 2-1 (0.7) ml o21 VE in controls.OCB, expressed as mlimin (Vo2resp) was28-5 (11-7) in patients and 14-0 (3.6) incontrols. REE was higher in patients (125 9(14.0)% predicted) than in controls (99.0(9-4)%). The estimated non-respiratorycomponent of REE was 112-1 (14.9)% forpatients and 93-0 (10-0)% for controls.Conclusions - In clinically stable patientswith cystic fibrosis the OCB at rest is in-

    creased but is not the sole explanation forincreased metabolic rate. This contrastswith the finding in COPD where the in-crease in REE is largely explained by in-creased OCB. This study also showed poorrepeatability and OCB measurementssimilar to earlier studies, which indicatesthat the technique is not suitable for lon-gitudinal studies.(Thorax 1996;51:126-131)

    Keywords: cystic fibrosis, resting energy expenditure,oxygen cost of breathing.

    Low body weight is common in cystic fibrosisand is related to inadequate energy intake,nutrient malabsorption, and excessive energyexpenditure. Resting energy expenditure(REE), an estimate of basal metabolic rate, is10-20% greater than in healthy subjects andmay contribute to energy imbalance.' 2At least three mechanisms - the gene defect,

    the consequences of chronic pulmonary in-fection, and altered lung mechanics - couldcontribute to increased basal metabolic rate incystic fibrosis. Cultured epithelial and con-nective tissue cell lines with a cystic fibrosisgenotype have greater oxygen demands thannon-cystic fibrosis cells.34 The increased energyexpenditure in infants with cystic fibrosis maybe related to the gene defect, but there isconflicting evidence relating the raised REE togenotype and lung disease.256The cystic fibrosis genotype is unlikely to

    account for all the increase of REE in patientswith established lung disease, particularly thatcharacterised by chronic bacterial infection andan intense inflammatory response associatedwith airways and parenchymal damage. Bron-chial sepsis leads to local release ofleukotrienes,free oxygen radicals, and cytokines includingtumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFoc) and theinterleukins IL-1 ,B and IL-8.7`'° CirculatingTNFoc levels in patients with cystic fibrosisand chronic pulmonary infection have beenassociated with an increased REE."

    Continuous injury to the lungs leads to pro-gressive parenchymal fibrosis and airway ob-struction resulting in abnormal lung mechanicswith probable increased oxygen cost and workof breathing. This is supported by the inverserelationship between increased REE and theseverity of airways obstruction in cysticfibrosis."2 Increased oxygen consumption byrespiratory muscles occurs in chronic ob-

    Section of RespiratoryMedicine, Universityof Wales College ofMedicineS C BellJ S ElbornD J Shale

    Respiratory FunctionLaboratoryM J Saunders

    Llandough HospitalNHS Trust, Penarth,South GlamorganCF64 2XX, UK

    Correspondence to:Dr S C Bell, Heart andLung Transplant Unit,St Vincents Hospital,Victoria Street, Darlinghurst,NSW, Australia 2010.Received 2 March 1995Returned to authors9 May 1995Revised version received30 June 1995Accepted for publication3 October 1995

    126

    group.bmj.com on July 14, 2011 - Published by thorax.bmj.comDownloaded from

  • Resting energy expenditure and oxygen cost of breathing in cystic fibrosis

    structive pulmonary disease (COPD) and thismight account for the increase in REE.'315'6

    In view of the limited published data onoxygen cost of breathing (OCB) in cystic fib-rosis, we sought to determine whether the OCBwas increased in clinically stable patients and itscontribution to the increase in REE in patientswith cystic fibrosis. We also examined the re-peatability of the measurement of OCB inpatients and healthy volunteers.

    MethodsSUBJECTSTen adult patients with cystic fibrosis diagnosedin childhood (sweat levels of sodium and chlor-ide >70 mmol/l) and 10 age and sex matchedhealthy volunteers were studied. The numberof subjects studied was based on a power cal-culation of data from a study of patients withCOPD using similar methods and experimentalprotocol.16 The difference in OCB betweenpatients and controls was 2 1 ml oxygen/litreof ventilation (ml 02/1 VE) with a standarddeviation of 1-3ml 02/1 VE in patients. Theestimated numbers in each group to detect asignificant difference (p

  • Bell, Saunders, Elborn, Shale

    Height was recorded using a stadiometer andweight using a balance beam scale (accurate to0-1 kg). Body mass index was calculated asweight/height2 (kg/m2). Fat free mass was es-timated by measurement of four skin foldsusing calipers (Holtain, UK) and the equationsof Durnin and Womersley.23

    FORMULAE AND CALCULATIONSOxygen cost of breathing (ml 02/1 VE) wascalculated from data collected on each visit by:

    [Dead space Vo2 - Resting VO2][Dead space VE - Resting VE].

    Mean data from both study days was calculatedfor each individual for Vo2, Vco2, VE, andOCB.

    Resting energy expenditure was calculatedusing the equation of Weir24:

    REE (ki/day)=[(3-941 x Vo2) + (1-10 x RERx Vo2)] x 6-025

    Oxygen consumption of the respiratorymuscles (Vo2resp) was estimated using theequation:

    Vo2resp (ml/min) = O2cost (ml/l VE) xresting minute ventilation (VE)

    The non-respiratory energy expenditure wasestimated by:

    Vo2non-resp = Vo2total - Vo2resp

    OCB and forced expiratory volume in onesecond (FEV,), transfer factor for carbon mon-oxide (TLCo) and residual volume to total lungcapacity ratio (RV/TLC). Repeatability ofOCBwas assessed according to the method of Blandand Altman by calculation ofthe error standarddeviation ofrepeatability and coefficient ofvari-ation (CV%).26 A value of p

  • Resting energy expenditure and oxygen cost of breathing in cystic fibrosis

    Table 2 Mean (SD) resting respiratory gas exchange and ventilation

    Cystic fibrosis Normal subjects Mean difference (95% CI)

    RR (breaths/min) 20 (7) 13 (4) 7 (0 to 12)*VE (1/min) 10-4 (1-4) 7-0 (1.2) 3-8 (2 2 to 4.8)**Vo, (mlmin) 266-1 (30 8) 237-2 (44 3) 35 0 (-5-5 to 73 2)Vo2 (mi/kg FFM/min) 5-5 (0-8) 4-2 (0 5) 1-3 (0 7 to 2 0)**RER 0 77 (0 04) 0-80 (0 05) -0 03 (-0 07 to 0 02)REE (kJ/min) 5-4 (0-6) 4-8 (0 9) 0 7 (-0 1 to 1-5)REE (kJ/kg FFM/min) 0-112 (0-02) 0-085 (0 01) 0-027 (0 01 to 0 04)**

    RR =respiratory rate; VE minute ventilation; Vo2= oxygen uptake; RER= respiratory exchange ratio; REE = resting energyexpenditure.* p

  • Bell, Saunders, Elborn, Shale

    OCB compared with control subjects, thoughcomparisons are difficult because of the smallnumbers involved and differences in techniquesused.27 The values for OCB in the healthycontrols in this study are similar to those re-ported by others.1628-30 Many studies have es-timated OCB in patients with COPD. Themean OCB in patients with cystic fibrosis wasless than that reported in COPD using similarmethods, though the range of OCB is greaterin COPD (1 -0-6-1 ml 02/lVE,'6 1.7-18.5,28 and4.7-8.230). Although the pathogenesis differsbetween COPD and cystic fibrosis, there aresimilarities resulting in raised REE and poormaintenance of body mass.The lack of an inverse relationship between

    OCB and pulmonary function tests in ourpatients was surprising. In two populations ofpatients with COPD spirometric parameters,resting ventilation, and OCB in the well nour-ished group were similar to the patients withcystic fibrosis in this study with an OCB of2-6 (1 1) ml 02/1 VE. In the undernourishedpatients with more severe pulmonary diseasethe oxygen cost was greater at 4-3 (10) ml02/1 VE.16 In patients with COPD negativecorrelations between FEV1 and oxygen costhave been found in some studies.30 The failureto demonstrate the expected relationship be-tween OCB and pulmonary function tests, asan index of the severity of lung disease, mayrelate to variability ofthe measurement ofOCBin the small population studied here. A furtherfactor may be the wide variation in severityof airways limitation and gas trapping in thispopulation as evidenced by the standard de-viations for FEV, and residual volume.

    In many studies OCB has been estimated bystimulating ventilation with an increased deadspace, an increased inspiratory resistance, orby CO2 induced hyperventilation. 3142730 Ir-respective ofthe method, determination of oxy-gen cost assumes a linear relationship betweenVo2 and VE within the range of ventilationstudied. A linear relationship is maintained toat least 30 1/min in healthy subjects to 20 1/minin patients with COPD.'5 We therefore aimedto maintain the increase in ventilation below20 1/min, and the mean increase in our patientswas 8-0 1/min which is similar to the level instudies of patients with COPD in which OCBwas estimated. " 16 30The most important technical issue with the

    measurement of the OCB is the repeatabilityof the method which limits the value of thistechnique in longitudinal studies. The errorstandard deviation for repeated measurementof OCB in both control subjects and patientswas a significant proportion of the mean OCB.This is similar to the between day repeatabilityin patients with COPD where an averagedifference of 0-9 ml 02/1 VE was reported.'6Two factors may account for such variability.Augmented ventilation causes a pro-portionately smaller increase in Vo2 than VE.Day to day differences in the AVo2 thereforehad a greater effect on the calculation ofoxygencost than AVE. Relatively small differences inmeasurement ofVo2 at rest and/or during deadspace ventilation may be magnified in the cal-

    culation of the OCB. During hyperventilationthe difference between Fio2 and Feo2 is re-duced, which may result in measurement errorofgas concentration within the oxygen analyser.Despite careful preparation of subjects, thecoefficient of variation was in excess of 20%which is similar to values reported previously.Donahoe reported repeatability in patients (butnot controls) for studies performed on con-secutive days. The average day to day differencewas 0-9 ml 02/1 VE of a mean OCB of 3-4,giving an approximate CV of 27%.16 In theonly previous study of OCB in cystic fibrosisthe mean CV for controls (n = 3) was 31% andfor patients (n = 3) was 32%.27

    Increased OCB reflects abnormal pulmonarymechanics and structure, and has been sug-gested as a factor in the excessive energy ex-penditure associated with chronic pulmonaryinjury in cystic fibrosis. Accepting the lim-itations imposed by the methodology used inthis study, OCB accounted for less than 50%of the additional REE. This is supported bythe weak relationship between spirometric val-ues and REE, which suggests that additionalfactors to abnormal pulmonary mechanics con-tribute to increased REE.' 12 This is in contrastto the situation in patients with COPD wherethe increase in REE was largely accountedfor by increased OCB.'6 However, we havepreviously shown that one third of the varianceof REE is explained by circulating TNFoc con-centrations and a further one third by FEV1,which suggests that the host inflammatory re-sponse may influence energy expenditure inchronically infected patients with cystic fib-rosis."

    Chronic bronchial infection is associatedwith local production of cytokines, includingTNFoc, IL-1i and IL-8.910 Infusion of TNFotin healthy volunteers induces an acute increasein REE with pyrexia, proteolysis, lipolysis, andrelease of acute phase proteins.3' Immuno-reactive circulating TNFot has been detectedin clinically stable patients with cystic fibrosis,though its biological significance remains un-certain.32A further factor may be the effect of the

    abnormal cystic fibrosis transmembrane con-ductance regulator (CFTR) protein on REE.In vitro studies suggest that the genetic defectmay increase oxygen consumption, and bothREE and total energy expenditure may be in-creased in infants with cystic fibrosis.45 How-ever, interpretation of these findings iscomplicated by difficulties in estimating se-verity of lung disease and excluding inter-current infection in infants. Additionally,patients homozygous for the AF508 mutationhave higher REE than heterozygotes and non-AF508 patients, but the homozygote group hasmore severe lung disease which may have anindependent influence on increased REE.2 Incontrast, a study of well nourished men withmild bronchiectasis showed that genotype didnot have a major effect on REE in patientswith cystic fibrosis.6

    In clinically stable patients with cystic fibrosisthe OCB at rest is increased compared withhealthy volunteers, but the increased OCB was

    130

    group.bmj.com on July 14, 2011 - Published by thorax.bmj.comDownloaded from

  • Resting energy expenditure and oxygen cost of breathing in cystic fibrosis

    not the sole cause of the increased REE ob-served in our patients. The lack of repeatabilityseverely limits the use of OCB, measured bycurrent methods, in longitudinal studies ofchronic progressive lung disorders.

    Dr S C Bell was supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Trust ofGreat Britain.The authors would like to thank Dr A P Smith and technical

    staff for the use and assistance in the Lung Function Laboratory,and Mrs Pat Davies for typing the manuscript.

    1 Vaisman N, Pencharz PB, Corey M, Canny GJ, Hahn E.Energy expenditure in patients with cystic fibrosis. JPediatr1987;111:496-500.

    2 O'Rawe A, McIntosh I, Dodge JA, Brock DJH, RedmondAOB, MacPherson AJS, et al. Increased energy ex-penditure in cystic fibrosis is associated with specificmutations. Clin Sci 1992;82:71-6.

    3 Feigal RJ, Shapiro BL. Mitochondrial calcium uptake andoxygen consumption in cystic fibrosis. Nature 1979;278:276-7.

    4 Cotton CV, Stutts MJ, Knowles MR, Gatzy JT, BoucherRC. Abnormal apical cell membrane in cystic fibrosisrespiratory epithelium. An in vitro electrophysiologicalanalysis. _7 Clin Invest 1987;79:80-5.

    5 Girardet JP, Tourian P, Sardet A, Veinberg F, Grimfeld A,Tournier G, et al. Resting energy expenditure in infantswith cystic fibrosis. .7 Paediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994;18:214-9.

    6 Fried MD, Durie PR, Tsui L-C, Corey M, Levison H,Pencharz PB. The cystic fibrosis gene and resting energyexpenditure. _7 Pediatr 1991 ;119:91 3-6.

    7 Greally P, Hussein MJ, Cook AJ, Sampson AP, Piper PJ,Price JF. Sputum tumour necrosis factor-alpha and leu-kotriene concentration in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child1993;68:389-92.

    8 Brown RK, Kelly FJ. Role of free radicals in the pathogenesisof cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1994;49:238-42.

    9 Suter S, Schaad UB, Roux-Lombard P, Girardin E, GrauG, Dayer J-M. Relation between tumor necrosis factor-alpha and granulocyte elastase-ot,-proteinase inhibitorcomplexes in the plasma of patients with cystic fibrosis.Amn Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:1640-4.

    10 Kronborg G, Hansen MB, Svenson M, Fomsgaard A, H6ibyN, Bendtzen K. Cytokines in sputum and serum frompatients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Pseudomonas aeru-ginosa infection as markers of destructive inflammation inthe lungs. Pediatr Pulmonol 1993;15:292-7.

    11 Elborn JS, Cordon SM, Western P, Macdonald IA, ShaleDJ. Tumour necrosis factor-a, resting energy expenditureand cachexia in cystic fibrosis. Clin Sci 1993;85:563-8.

    12 Buchdahl RM, Cox M, Fulleylove C, Marchant JL, TomkinsAM, Brueton MJ, et al. Increased energy expenditure incystic fibrosis. Appl Physiol 1988;64:1810-6.

    13 McGregor M, Becklake MR. The relationship of oxygencost of breathing to respiratory mechanical work andrespiratory force. 7 Clin Invest 1961;41:971-80.

    14 Campbell EJM, Westlake EK, Cherniack RM. The oxygenconsumption of efficiency of the respiratory muscles ofyoung male subjects. Clin Sci 1959;18:55-65.

    15 Bartlett RS Jr, Brubach HF, Specht H. Oxygen cost ofbreathing. _ Appl Physiol 1958;12:413-24.

    16 Donahoe M, Rogers RM, Wilson DO, Pennock BE. Oxygenconsumption of the respiratory muscles in normal and inmalnourished patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:385-91.

    17 Liljestrand G. Untersuchungen uber due atmungsarbeit.Scand Arch Physiol 1918;35:199-293.

    18 Weissman C, Damask MC, Askanazi J, Rosenbaum SH,Kinney JM. Evaluation of a non-invasive method for themeasurement of metabolic rate in humans. Clin Sci 1985;69:135-41.

    19 Knudsen RJ, Slatin RL, Lebowitz MD, Burrows B. Themaximal expiratory flow volume curve. Normal standardsvariability and effects of age. Amn Rev Respir Dis 1976;113:587-600.

    20 Polgar G, Promedhat V. Pulmionaryfunction testing in childreni:technique and standards. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971.

    21 Goldman HI, Becklake MR. Respiratory function tests.Normal values at median altitude and the prediction ofnormal results. Anm Rev Tuberc 1959;79:457-67.

    22 Cotes JE. Lungfunsction: assessnient and application in mledicine.4th edn. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1979.

    23 Dumin JVGA, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from totalbody density and its estimation from skinfold thickness:measurements on 481 men and women aged 16 to 72years. Br3tNutr 1974;32:77-97.

    24 Weir JB de V. New methods for calculating metabolic ratewith special reference to protein metabolism. J7Appl Phvsiol1949;109: -9.

    25 Harris JA, Benedict FG. A bionmetric study of basal nmetabolismlinnman. Washington DC: Carnegie Institute of Wash-ington, Publication No 279-1919.

    26 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessingagreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet 1986;i:307-10.

    27 Katsardis CV, Desmond KJ, Coates AL. Measuring theoxygen cost of breathing in normal adults and patientswith cystic fibrosis. Respir Physiol 1986;65:257-66.

    28 Cherniak RM. The oxygen consumption and efficiency ofthe respiratory muscles in health and emphysema. 7 ClinInvest 1959;38:494-9.

    29 Campbell EJM, Westlake EK, Cherniack RM. Simplemethods of estimating oxygen consumption and efficiencyin the muscles of breathing. JAppl Physiol 1957;11:303-8.

    30 Sridhar MK, Carter R, Lean MEJ, Banham SW. Restingenergy expenditure and nutritional state of patients withincreased oxygen cost of breathing due to emphysema,scoliosis and thoracoplasty. Thorax 1994,49:781-5.

    31 van der Poll T, Sauerwein HP. Tumour necrosis factor-a:its role in the metabolic response to sepsis. Clin Sci 1993;84:247-56.

    32 Norman D, Elbom JS, Cordon SM, Rayner RJ, WisemanMS, Hiller EJ, et al. Plasma tumour necrosis factor alphain cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1991;46:91-5.

    131

    group.bmj.com on July 14, 2011 - Published by thorax.bmj.comDownloaded from

  • doi: 10.1136/thx.51.2.126 1996 51: 126-131Thorax

    S. C. Bell, M. J. Saunders, J. S. Elborn, et al. fibrosis.cost of breathing in patients with cystic Resting energy expenditure and oxygen

    http://thorax.bmj.com/content/51/2/126Updated information and services can be found at:

    These include:

    References http://thorax.bmj.com/content/51/2/126#related-urls

    Article cited in:

    serviceEmail alerting

    the box at the top right corner of the online article.Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in

    Notes

    http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissionsTo request permissions go to:

    http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintformTo order reprints go to:

    http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/To subscribe to BMJ go to:

    group.bmj.com on July 14, 2011 - Published by thorax.bmj.comDownloaded from

    The author has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate.The author has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate.