Upload
doannga
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Resolving transfer pricing controversies, handling audits and queries, and “best
practices” in TP documentation:A practical guide
Douglas FoneGlobal Partner, Transfer Pricing Associates
2
Content
1. Introduction to transfer pricing Slide 32. Key trends in Asia Pacific Slide 63. Practical approach to transfer pricing system design Slide 114. Transfer pricing risk assessment Slide 175. Mastering multiple demands for transfer pricing documentation Slide 226. Dispute resolution process Slide 267. Examples of key TP transactions - case studies Slide 308. Key recommendations Slide 359. Questions & answers Slide 37
3
Introduction to Transfer Pricing
4
• Supply of raw materials
• Purchase of finished goods
• Supply of right to use group IP
• Supply of know-how
• Supply of services
• Supply of bank and credit guarantees
• Supply of loan finance
Overseas MNE
Subsidiary in Singapore
• Payment for raw materials
• Charge for sale of finished goods
• Payment of royalties
• Payment for know-how
• Payment of service fees
• Payment of guarantee fees
• Payment of interest
What is transfer pricing and why is it important?
5
• Pricing of all inter-company transactions• Necessary in every multinational• Determines profit allocation within multinational• Regulations required to ensure fair and reasonable for all stakeholders:
Tax authorities – fair share of profit to levy taxCFO, FD, CEO, Heads of Tax etc – shareholder valueCurrent shareholders – return on investmentPotential investors – future return on investment, corporate governance, proper valuation of the businessLending institutions – corporate governanceEmployees – performance measurementBoards of Directors – corporate governance, shareholder valueCompetitors – relative shareholder value
What is transfer pricing and why is it important?
6
Key Trends in Asia Pacific
7
Key trends in Asia Pacific- Overview
• Growing importance of transfer pricing in AsiaTax authorities sharing knowledge and best practiceDouble tax treaties, APAs and MAP casesLess reliance on customs duties for fiscal revenueIncreased competition as more countries introduce audit programsDevelopments in China
New EIT law introduced wef 1 January 2008Documentation requirements to be effective from 1 January 2008
Other countries forced to protect their tax basesHong Kong (next DIPN will be re TP)Taiwan (documentation now compulsory)Singapore (guidelines and review program introduced)Vietnam (guidelines and audit program recently introduced)
8
Key trends in Asia Pacific- Singapore’s new Transfer Pricing Consultation programme
• Issued 6 August 2008• Notice of IRAS questionnaires to be sent for fact gathering• Selected taxpayers for a TPC will need to be able to show:
– Business structure– Local activities and mode of operations, – Explain how certain factors in its business or industry affect its operating results– Nature, pricing and benchmarking of the related party transactions– Documentation prepared.
• Outcome (1) IRAS’ opinion on level of taxpayer’s transfer pricing risk, based on quality of documentation and “commercial realism” of results.
• Outcome (2) IRAS’ recommendations on how the documentation or methodology may be improved.
9
Key trends in Asia Pacific- Practical issues faced by multinationals
• Satisfying the increasing documentation compliance burden• Managing the overall effective tax rate in face of increases in tax rates and greater
enforcement of transfer pricing regulations• Finding reasonable comparable data to support the arm’s length nature of inter-
company pricing• Countering the use of secret comparables by certain tax authorities• Dealing with the risk of aggressive and unpredictable audits in multiple countries• Addressing the rapid development of transfer pricing in China and intra-China
variations in approach• Dealing with varied level of experience in different jurisdictions• Is the existing transfer pricing system in Asia likely to withstand serious scrutiny?
10
• To counter evasion or money laundering• FIN 48 implications – corporate governance• Increased interaction between tax authorities
Emerging trends in Asia Pacific
Greater exchange of information between tax authorities
• Need for transparency and fairness in application• Increased resources required and more training• Conflict with need to attract FDI – reducing in importance
Increased enforcement –more audits/APAs/MAPs
• Need for certainty and consistency in application• Agreement on transaction or profit approach – to prevent anomalies
Integration of customs and transfer pricing
• Emerging global issue – more MAPs likely but double taxation in the meantime• Common approach required from tax authorities•Business restructuring
• Domestic transactions as well?• Alleviate through Masterfile approach• Acceptance of economic indicators/safe harbours?• Exemptions for small and medium sized companies?
Compliance burden for MNCs increasing
• Thin cap and transfer pricing interaction?• Availability and definition of the thin cap safe harbour• Guarantee fees – GE case – approach of tax authorities?
•Financial Transactions
11
Practical Approach to Transfer Pricing System Design
- Get it right from the start
12
Practical approach to system design- TPA’s Transfer Pricing Process
TPA’s Transfer Pricing Process:
Transfer Pricing Process:
COMPANY’SBUSINESS
OPERATIONS
How to get from a business model to a manageable transfer pricing system?
13
- Investigate industry and business context
- Identify key business objectives of management e.g. market penetration
- Analyse key functions/ activities performed
- Identify assets and risks associated with activities
- Analyse the nature of the current value chain and plans for the future
- Identify responsibility centres- Determine appropriate TP
methodology- Consider opportunities to
minimize overall tax rate- Establish appropriate
performance measurement / incentives
- Legalise inter-company transactions – agreements
- Conduct comparability search to support result
- Prepare Masterfile/local documentation
- Prepare transfer pricing policy paper
- Identify key risk countries –country risk matrix
- Introduce maintenance and disclosure manual
- Ensure legal agreements in place and consistent
- Prepare transfer pricing defence file
- Tax risk assessment – e.g. FIN 48
- Investigate possibility of APAs?
- Risk ranking/screening for transfer pricing audit
- Manage transfer pricing audits effectively
- Explore avenues for arbitration
- Consider availability of MAP
Practical approach to system design- TPA’s Transfer Pricing Process
IDENTIFICATIONOF BUSINESS
CONTEXT
DESIGN &IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION RISK ASSESSMENT/
MANAGEMENT
INPUT: COMPANY’SBUSINESS OPERATION
OUTPUT: DEFENSIBLE/WORKABLE TRANSFER
PRICING SYSTEM
14
• Identify and analyse business context• Determine existing responsibility centre profile• Consider whether existing pricing model is arm’s length
If not, changes can be made to overall profit allocation by amending pricing to ensure it is arm’s length
• If changes are made to the pricing model:Identify functions, assets and/or risks that can be moved/centralisedCarry out financial and risk management scenario analysesAvoid business restructuring issues - ensure substance over formPrepare business case for change – anti-avoidance rulesPerform thorough economic analysis – documentationEnsure legal agreements are consistent and in placeInvolve all parts of the business to ensure changes are practical eg are changes required to IT systems?
Practical approach to system design- Planning process
DESIGN &IMPLEMENTATION
15
• Remunerate companies based on responsibilities:Expense centre e.g. core research, strategic marketing
actual costs (inc. variances) plus arm’s length mark-upCost centre - e.g. contract manufacturing, support services
standard costs x actual volumes (maybe non-controllable variances as well) plus arm’s length mark-up
Revenue centre - e.g. limited risk distribution, commissionaireallocation of margin by way of commission on sales revenue
Profit centre - e.g. full risk distribution, speculative treasury operationsmarket price x actual volumes (net margin should provide adequate return)
Investment centre - e.g. intellectual property owner and developer effectively residual profit split
• Economic substance and commercial reality drives the setting of inter-company prices
Practical approach to system design- Introduction to responsibility centres
DESIGN &IMPLEMENTATION
16
Investment Center
IP owner/ parent company
Revenue Center
Sales/distribution subsidiaries
Cost Center
Contract manufacturer
Expense Center
Contract R&D activities
Profit Center
Entrepreneur (principal)
R&D services
manufacturing services
sale of products
license
Practical approach to system design- Typical centralised business model
DESIGN &IMPLEMENTATION
17Your bridge to world-wide transfer pricing services
Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment- Know what to look out for
18
Transfer pricing risk assessment- Likely weak spots
IDENTIFICATIONOF BUSINESS
CONTEXT
DESIGN &IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION RISK ASSESSMENT/
MANAGEMENT
INPUT: COMPANY’SBUSINESS OPERATION
OUTPUT: DEFENSIBLE/WORKABLE TRANSFER
PRICING SYSTEM
A B C D
Industry and business model
not clear
Legal, economic and accounting realities
do not match
Non-compliance or insufficient
compliance
Transfer pricing audit and conversion
risks
RISK ASSESSMENT/MANAGEMENT
19
• OECD note in October 2006 re audit case selection• ATO methodology
Quality of documentationCommercial realism of results
• Common audit trigger factors, including:High risk transactions - royalties, service fees, financial transactionsAggressive tax planning structures eg transactions with tax havensDisclosure of unusual methodologies in Sch 25A or equivalentLower profitability than the industry norm, varying levels of profitabilityLack of responsiveness to queries – poor corporate governance standardsPoor compliance and tax payment record – inadequate TP documentationPoor relationships/Guanxi with tax officials
Transfer pricing risk assessment- Tax authority approaches
RISK ASSESSMENT/MANAGEMENT
20
• Subsidiary of overseas parent companySingle country risk assessmenteg ATO approach
• Global MNC in respect of single transaction typeSingle transaction risk assessment – e.g. HO service feesBased on specific risk factors for specific transaction
• Global MNC in respect of all transaction types – FIN 48 approachRecognition of all transactionsAre they ‘more likely than not’ to withstand tax authority audit?Adopt objective measurement methodology
Audit/APA history?Documentation/benchmarking available?Treaty/MAP protection? Tax rate differential?
Transfer pricing risk assessment- Multinational approaches
RISK ASSESSMENT/MANAGEMENT
21
Transfer pricing risk assessment- A practical tool
Type of Transaction Recharge of Costs
Management/ Support Services
Management/ Support Services
Royalty Sale of Goods
Sale of Goods to
Loss-makerNumber of countries involved 2 2 20 20 30 10Transaction amount US$1m US$10m US$50m US$50m US$500m US$100mRisk rating
Documentation recommended:InvoiceLegal agreementSummary TP reportMasterfilecountry risk analysismaintenance & disclosure
manualLocalisation of MFAdditional analysisother methodologiesin depth industry analysisloss justification paper
RISK ASSESSMENT/MANAGEMENT
22Your bridge to world-wide transfer pricing services
Mastering Multiple Demands forTransfer Pricing Documentation
23
• Preparation of core set of documents per best practice• Maintained at head office for efficient updating• Comprises OECD-compliant documentation in modular format, easy to leverage:
Business context and industry analysisFunctional analysis for each type of entityClassification of each type of entity - responsibility centre profilesInter-company transactionsTransfer pricing system designGlobal or regional benchmarking
• Also supporting documentation:Transfer pricing policy paperCountry risk analysisMaintenance and disclosure manual
Transfer pricing documentation- Masterfile documentation: What is it?
DOCUMENTATION
24
• Basic outline of Masterfile transfer pricing report:Executive SummaryIntroduction and purpose of reportCompany and industry analysis – global/regionalFunctional analysis – regionalClassification of companies – responsibility centresOutline of transfer pricing policy for price settingSelection of methods per OECD for price checkingApplication of methods – for each classification of companyConclusionsAppendices, including OECD Guidelines, support for economic analysis, inter-company agreements etc.
• Satisfies 70-80% of local country requirements
Transfer pricing documentation- Outline of Masterfile transfer pricing report
DOCUMENTATION
25
• Benefits of Masterfile documentationSatisfies around 70%-80% of local requirements Reduces compliance costs - prevents duplication of effortMoves away from costly country by country approachConsistent classification of companiesConsistent economic analysis – selection, definition of PLIs etcMNCs take ownership of monitoring their TP issues
• Is it possible in Asia? Definitely!Convergence of acceptable methodologiesAvailability of regional financial data improving
• Useful risk management tool for MNCsWhere are the exposures?Where are the opportunities?
Transfer pricing documentation- Masterfile documentation: Benefits
DOCUMENTATION
26Your bridge to world-wide transfer pricing services
Dispute Resolution Process - Tips for handling tax authority enquiries
27
• Before notification of review/auditEnsure all legal agreements are in placeDesign your transfer pricing system in accordance with arm’s length principleEnsure transfer pricing documentation is prepared in advance – contemporaneousCarry out regular reviews of returns vs benchmarksCollect other relevant documentation – eg Board minutes, evidence of negotiationEnsure documentation is up-to-dateBe aware of risk areasPrepare additional documentation to cover significant exposures
Dispute resolution processRISK ASSESSMENT/
MANAGEMENT
28
• After notification of review/auditAppoint team to handle the queries, including technical advisersRespond promptly and fully to requests for information Assume tax office has full knowledge – do not rely on non-disclosure!Keep full and accurate record of information providedAssume from the start that the dispute will go to CourtAnticipate direction of tax office queries – be one step aheadKnow your strengths and weaknessesConsider availability of MAP and APACarry out detailed scenario analyses – what would it mean to you?
Dispute resolution processRISK ASSESSMENT/
MANAGEMENT
29
• During conduct of review/auditSuggest appropriate people for tax office interviewCarry out test interviews to ensure clear communicationRecord the interviews – tape or by note-takingShare file notes with tax officials to arrive at agreed version of discussionsCo-operate with and show respect at all times to the tax officialsEnsure everyone in the office is aware of the visitAccompany the tax officials at all times while on company premisesBe clear of your facts and your preferred direction of enquiry
Dispute resolution processRISK ASSESSMENT/
MANAGEMENT
30
Examples of TP transactions- Case studies of key challenges
31
ItalyHeadquarters
Distributors
Legal ownership and developmentof brands/ trade names and design
Case study I- Key transactions
Luxury goods
Principal /Manufacturer
HKProcurement
Local operation in 5 years of consecutive losses
Company manufacture and determine global marketing strategy
32
Key considerations- International tax and TP issues
• Consecutive losses – all TP related?• Key reasons from industry and business challenges
Practical solution• Loss justification paper to draw out anomalies in the industry, key business
challenges (potential argument may exist if problems specific to market or business)
• Ensure Transfer Pricing policy reflect functions, assets and risk. It will be difficult for principal entity to argue that it needs to be making profits when it drives all key decisions and assumes most risk
• Any start- up considerations? -Review pattern of losses and gains and conduct an average of profitability
33
Local and overseas third partysuppliers
Third partyCustomers
Raw materials – prices negotiated by HQ
Sale of finished goods (price set by negotiation with Distributors based on forecast resale minus methodology)
Cost recharge (based on unitsproduced)
USHeadquartersHQ cost (inc brand
development costs) recharge (based on relative EBIT)
Marketer/DistributorsSingapore
ManufacturerChina – producingon orders by HQ
R&D Company – under direction from HQ
Legal ownership and developmentof brands/ trade names (no royalties)
Sale to third party customers at market price
Case study II - Key transactions
34
Case study- Issues and consequences
Current State China manufacturer Distributors R&D companies US headquarters
Responsibility centre profile
Cost centre Revenue/Profit centre Expense centre Profit and Investment centre
Current profitability High and variable, fluctuating
Low and variable, some losses
Break even Break even at best, or losses
Issues arising Increase in overall ETR
Potential trapped losses causing high overall ETR
No profit - lack of commercial reality
Losses - lack of commercial reality
Local economic ownership of IP
Local economic ownership of IP
Diverse ownership of group IP
Consequences Loss of shareholder value
Loss of shareholder value Loss of shareholder value
Loss of shareholder value
Inability to pay dividends by HQ
Increase in transfer pricing audit risk
Increase in transfer pricing audit risk
Increase in transfer pricing audit risk throughout group
Future business restructuring issues and transfer pricing
audit risk
35
Key Recommendations
36
• Apply best practice transfer pricing system designProactive approach – price-setting should be on an arm’s length basisUse the responsibility centre concept for system designLet the business model drive the transfer pricing systemMaintain contemporaneous TP documentation
• Adopt Masterfile approach to satisfy compliance burdenEnsures higher quality documentation for good corporate governancePuts MNCs in control of their transfer pricing documentationProvides flexible framework for ongoing management of TP risks
• Risk management should be the trigger for tax planningWhere are the exposures – to avoid double taxation?Where are the opportunities – to reduce overall effective tax?
Key recommendations
37
Questions & Answers