Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2018 International Conference on Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (CCME 2018)
ISBN: 978-1-60595-611-4
Research on Relay Protection Schema and Protection Setting of Large Capacity Synchronous Condenser
Yan-jun LI1, Xiao-yang WANG2,* and Rui YU3
1China Electric Research Institute, Beijing 100085, China
2Beijing Sifang Automation Co., LTD, Beijing 100085, China
*Corresponding author
Keywords: Large capacity synchronous condenser, Protection schema, Protection setting.
Abstract. Now, the large capacity synchronous condensers are needed in the State Grid. However,
the research on its protection is rare. Based on its application in AC/DC converter stations, this paper
summarizes the studies of the relay protection function and schema about large capacity synchronous
condensers and transformer group, furthermore analyzes the main protection principle and setting
principle of relay protection (differential protection, inter-turn protection, stator grounding
protection, etc). At last an example of setting value of synchronous condenser and transformer group
protection in converter station is given.
Introduction
The characteristic of “strong DC and weak AC” grid requires fast and effective reactive power
compensation devices. The first, to quid or reduce grid voltage fluctuations, the reactive power
compensation device should quickly generate a large amount of reactive power in a very short time at
the moment of the fault [1]
. The second, in the case of fault recovery (transient process), the reactive
power compensation device should continuously provide a large amount of reactive power, that is, a
strong overload capability is required. The last, it should provide reactive compensation for the
system during steady state operation.
Since the 1990s, the development of power grids is not very fast, the SVC and SVG technologies
have been fully developed. The synchronous condenser has been greatly weakened in the grid, and
the research on the operation and maintenance technology (especially the principle of relay
protection) has been greatly weakened too.
Recently, the State Grid Corporation of China has carried out researches on the impact of large
capacity synchronous condenser including relay protections [2]
. Though the design structure of the
new synchronous condenser has been improved there are still some failure possibilities. Especially
the stator turn-to-turn fault will pose a serious threat to the condenser and the grid if not installed
short-circuit protection [5]. The operation of the large capacity synchronous condenser will also
affect the current grid relay protection which based on electrical quantities such as impedance,
voltage, phase angle, etc. And it may threaten the safe and stable operation of the power system.
Therefore, it is necessary to carry out systematic research on the relay protection of the large capacity
synchronous condenser.
Synchronous Condenser Protection Schema and Setting
The latest developed synchronous condenser transformer protection (including excitation transformer
protection, without rotor grounding protection) is shown in Table 1 below [3]
.
410
Table 1. Protection schema of synchronous condenser.
No1 Protection
1 Pilot differential protection
2 Stator winding inter-turn short circuit protection
3 Voltage controlled time overcurrent
4 Stator winding grounding protection
5 Stator winding overvoltage protection
6 Stator winding overload protection
7 Rotor surface (negative sequence) overload protection
8 Excitation winding overload protection
9 Excitation circuit grounding protection
10 Over excitation protection
11 Power-on protection
12 Under voltage decoupling protection
13 Loss of field protection
14 Low frequency overcurrent protection
15 Non-electricity protection
This paper focuses on the characteristics of differential protection and turn-to-turn short circuit
protection, as well as characteristics of zero-voltage stator grounding protection and tuning
principles.
1) Pilot differential protection
The main protection reflects the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault of the internal stator winding and
its lead-out line, which is basically similar to the generator longitudinal differential protection and
consisting of an instantaneous differential protection differential and a ratio differential protection as
shown in figure 1.
Idz
Izd
Idiff
IB
Trip area Restraint
area
Iins
Instantaneous differential
Percent differential
Figure 1. Differential protection operation characteristics.
Instantaneous differential protection regardless of the magnitude of the restraining current, a trip
signal will be issued as soon as the differential current exceeds the threshold. The purpose of this
stage of differential protection is extremely fast operation in case of high magnitude internal fault
currents. The setting value should avoid maximum unbalance current while unsynchronized close.
The percent differential protection uses a dual-slope operating characteristic. And the differential
start up current should avoid maximum unbalance current while the synchronous condenser running
in rated load, which is: Is ≥ Krel(Ker + ∆m)I𝑛
Krel - Reliability factor, value 1.5~2.0;
Ker - CT bias, value 0.1;
In - Rated secondary current of synchronous condenser;
∆m - Unbalance current factor caused by sampling bias, value 0.02.
2) Stator winding inter-turn protection
411
There is a Longitudinal zero sequence voltage while the inter-turn is short circuited. And interturn
protection is designed on this voltage.
The protection criterion is 3U0 >UZJ, and with a delay.
3U0 - Fundamental wave zero sequence voltage;
UZJ - Longitudinal zero sequence voltage setting.
Transformer Protection Schema and Setting
The transformer protection of synchronous condenser transformer set is shown in Table 2 below[3]
.
Table 2. Protection schema of transformer.
No1 Protection
1 Pilot differential protection
2
Voltage controlled time
overcurrent
3 Neutral point zero overcurrent
4 Over excitation protection
5 Over load protection
6 Open phase protection
1) Instantaneous differential protection
The instantaneous differential which entails an overcurrent protection is provided for fast tripping
on heavy internal faults. It will issue a trip signal as soon as differential current of any phase exceeds
the threshold. And the instantaneous differential protection should avoid maximum excitation current
and maximum unbalance current when an external fault occurs. Generally the threshold is K ∗ Ie
K - Reliability factor,value 1.5~2.0;
In- Rated current of the transformer.
2) The percent differential protection
The percent differential protection uses a treble-slope dual break-point operating characteristic
with magnetizing inrush and overexcitation and CT failure detection inhibits integrated, as shown in
figure 2.
Kb1
Kb3
Idz
Idiff0.6In
IIns
Trip area
Restraint
area
5In0.4In
K2
Idiff
Instantaneous differential
K1
Kb2
IT
Variable percentdifferential
Percentdifferential
Figure 2. Differential protection operation characteristics of transformer.
Differential and restraint current calculation are all with automatic ratio compensation and vector
group compensation. The differential current is Idiff = | ∑ IiNi=1 | . And he restraint current is
Ires =1
2|Imax − ∑ Ij
N−1j=1 |.
Ii - The current vector of side I, corresponding to HV, MV and LV windings.
N - Total current inputs of the IED.
Imax - Maximum current vector among the N current inputs of the IED.
412
∑ IjN−1j=1 - The sum of the other current inputs of the IED, not including Imax, suppose it is side j.
Differential startup current setting value should avoid unbalance current while working with rated
load, shown as IdiffStar = Krel(Ker + ∆U + ∆m)IT2n.
Krel - Reliability factor, value 1.3~1.5;
Ker - CT bias, value 0.032 for 10P CT and 0.012 for 5P/TP CT;
∆U - Regulation bias;
∆m - Unbalance current factor caused by CT difference, value 0.05;
IT2n- Rated secondary current of transformer.
Excitation Transformer Protection Schema and SETTING
The main protection of excitation transformer includes differential protection and overcurrent
protection. Differential startup current setting value of excitation transformer should avoid unbalance
current while working with rated load. As forced excitation lasts longer time when the synchronous
condenser is working, big difference between CTs in two sides causes big unbalance current. And
0.5In is recommended for startup value.
An Example of Synchronous Condenser Protection Setting
A typical application of the large capacity synchronous condenser is shown in figure 4.
Synchronous Condenser
Excitation Transformer
Transformer
CB1 CB2 CB3
Figure 4. Typical diagram of the large capacity synchronous condenser.
The parameters of the system are shown as table 3.
413
Table 3. Parameters of the system.
Synchronous condenser
Rated capacity 300Mvar
Xd 148%
Xq 145%
Rated rotating speed 3000 round/min
Stator rated current 8kA
Rated no-loaded Excitation voltage 100V
Rated no-loaded Excitation current 900A
Rated on-load Excitation voltage 300V
Rated on-load Excitation current 2.4kA
Transformer
Rated capacity 360MVA
Wiring type Y /Δ-11
Excitation transformer
Rated capacity 5.3MVA
Rated voltage 20/6.3kV
For the large capacity synchronous condenser, instantaneous differential current setting is 3~5 In.
In this case the value is 4In . And, startup differential current setting applies the formula Is ≥Krel(Ker + ∆m)In, while Is = (0.2~0.3)I𝑛 and Krel = 2, the setting value is 0.3In .
For the transformer, instantaneous differential current setting is 5In . And, the startup differential
current setting value is 0.5In
The setting value of the main protection is shown as table 4.
Table 4. The list of settings for a synchronous condenser transformer group protection.
No. Setting Value
1 synchronous condenser instantaneous differential current (A) 4In
2 synchronous condenser startup differential current (A) 0.3In
3 synchronous condenser differential over limit current (A) 0.1In
4 transformer instantaneous differential current (A) 5In
5 transformer startup differential current (A) 0.5In
6 excitation transformer instantaneous differential current (A) 8In
7 excitation transformer startup differential current (A) 0.5In
8 excitation transformer differential over limit current (A) 0.2In
Summary
The large capacity synchronous condenser improves the short-circuit ratio of DC transmission system
access, enhances the dynamic voltage support capability of the AC side grid, and improves the system
stability by using the force excitation.
It is of great significance not only to the reliable operation of the power system, but also to the
important and expensive equipment to reduce the damage caused by various short circuit and
abnormal operation, and it also has significant economic benefits. In this paper, the principle and
setting value of main protection of the synchronous condenser transformer group are customized and
detailed verification. Combined with the example, a feasible setting list is proposed, which can be
used as an example of the synchronous condenser protection settings.
Acknowledgement
This research was financially supported by Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation
of China: Research on Fault Simulation, Protection and Control of Synchronous Condenser.
414
References
[1] Ya-ting Wang, Yi-chi Zhang. Study on Application of New Generation Large Capacity
Synchronous Condenser in Power Grid [J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(1) (in Chinese).
[2] Lin Gui. Inernal Falult Analysis and Optimization Design of Main Protection Scheme for
Shanghai Electric Phase Modifier [J]. Electirc Power, 2017, 50(12):33-37(in Chinese).
[3] Dongxia Zou, et. SFC start and relay protection of 300 Mvar large synchronous condenser, Power
System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(20): 160-164(in Chinese).
[4] Yan-wei Wang, Yun Qin, Xian-fu Gong, et al. Optimizing Configuration of STATCOM Under
Asynchronous Networking Mode of Guangdong Power Grid[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2017,
30(7):53-59(in Chinese).
[5] Qing-yu Zeng. Techno-economic analysis of UHVAC and UHVDC power transmission
systems[J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(2):341-348(in Chinese).
[6] Shun Zhang, Zhi-ping Ge, Guo Tao, et al. Research on relationship between the capacity of
systematic peak regulation and conventional power startup mode after access to large-scale new
energy[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(1): 106-110
[7] Chao Liu, Yong-ming Yang, Xiao-fu Xiong, et al. Analysis of the impact of fixed SVC on fault
component directional protection[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2011, 39(19): 110-114.
[8] Qing Liu, Zeng-ping Wang, Yuan Zhang. Research of a new method of eliminating the effect of
STATCOM on distance protection[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38(24): 93-98.
[9] Yong Li, Han-xiang Cheng, Wei-ming Fang, et al. Review on Application of Reactive Power
Compensation Device in Power System[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2016, 29(5):77-81.
415