Upload
vanngoc
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RESEARCH & INNOVATION in
RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT
ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
A personal introduction
ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
Associate Professor of Finance, ICMA Centre, Henley Business School
Senior Academic Fellow, PRI
Managing Director, Sociovestix Labs Social Enterprise
President, ReFine Research Charity
Full list of affiliations on LinkedIn
ESG ~ Environmental, Social and/or Governance information
Presentation:
Part A:
ESG integration into Equities
Part B:
ESG integration into Fixed Income
Appendix:
Part C:
ESG within Financial Data Science
Part D:
DynamicESG: Responsible, especially when it matters
Agenda
ESG integration
into Equities ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
• ESG integration strategies can lead to sizable abnormal returns (Alphas):
• Corporate Governance (Bebchuk et al., 2009, Gompers et al., 2003, 2011)
• ESG Engagement (Becht et al. 2009)
• Eco-efficiency (Derwall et al., 2005)
• Employee Relations (Statman and Glushkov, 2009; Edmans, 2011)
• Community Relations (Kempf and Osthoff, 2007, Statman and Glushkov, 2009; Borgers et al. 2013)
• Green Real Estate (Eichholtz, Kok and Quigley, 2010)
• Best in class strategies (Kempf and Osthoff, 2007; Statman and Glushkov, 2009; Borgers et al. 2013)
• Successful ESG investment requires specific skills (Gil-Bazo et al., 2009)
• Financial institutions with more ESG appeal are found to • realise better competitive outcome in mortgage and deposit markets
(Callado-Muñoz & Utrero-Gonzalez, 2011)
• have more loyal clients (Bollen, 2007).
Some ESG Alpha findings
Integration across ESG criteria
Kempf and Osthoff, 2007
Light and dark blue indicate the 1%, 5% and 10% significance level, respectively. Grey bars represent statistically insignifiicant
estimations
6.22%
4.29% 4.09%
2.54%
0.46%
-1.13%
8.70%
7.59%
-2.50%
0.00%
2.50%
5.00%
7.50%
10.00%
Community Best-In-Class
(BIC)
Diversity BIC Employee Relations BIC
Environment BIC
Human Right BIC
Product BIC All criteria BIC All criteria BIC with Negative
Screening
The authors analysed the performance of a long-short investment strategy backing the
top 5% and shorting the bottom 5% stocks in an ESG criteria over the period 1991 to
2003 for the US market.
ESG integration in 10 GICS industries
Light and dark blue indicate the 1%, 5% and 10% significance level, respectively. Grey bars represent statistically insignifiicant
estimations
We analysed the performance of investing in the Global 100 most (likely) sustainable companies in
the year before (left bar) and after (right bar) the companies from each Global Industry
Classification Standard (GICS) industry received the annual award at the World Economic Forum
from 2005-2008.
7.20%
4.92%
3.48% 3.48%
7.20% 6.96%
-0.72%
-2.04%
9.00%
6.72%
4.08%
-0.84%
1.80% 0.96%
10.80%
6.48%
3.12% 3.84%
-3.84%
-0.72%
-6.00%
-3.00%
0.00%
3.00%
6.00%
9.00%
12.00%
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Staples
Energy Financials Health Care Industrials IT Materials Telecom. Services
Utilities
[Based on a research project with P.S. Yu]
Analysing the materiality of ESG factors …
Synthetic Portfolio Construction
[Based on a research project with M. Rezec]
ESG:
Barely related to volatility (standard deviation)
Sample: FTSE All World 2005-2010 (Hoepner, Rezec & Siegl, 2013)
[Based on a research project with M. Rezec and S. Siegl]
ESG:
Reducing Downside Risk
Sample: FTSE All World 2005-2010 (Hoepner, Rezec & Siegl, 2013)
[Based on a research project with M. Rezec and S. Siegl]
ESG:
Strongly Reducing Extreme Downside Risk
Sample: FTSE All World 2005-2010 (Hoepner, Rezec & Siegl, 2013)
[Based on a research project with M. Rezec and S. Siegl]
ESG:
Very Strongly Reducing Worst Case Risk
Sample: FTSE All World 2005-2010 (Hoepner, Rezec & Siegl, 2013)
Portfolios rated most responsible (shown in blue) have over 100 basis points lower worst case risk than less responsible portfolios (shown in red).
[Based on a research project with M. Rezec and S. Siegl]
ESG integration
into Fixed Income ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
ESG, Risk Reduction, and fixed income
“ Companies with high
ESG scores are found to
have less company
specific risk ”
(Bouslah et al., 2012; Boutin-Dufresne and Savaria, 2004; Lee and Faff, 2009; Bauer, Derwall and Hann, 2009; Oikonomou et al., 2012)
“ Corporations with
better ESG ratings are
found to have lower cost
of debt and cost of
capital and higher credit
ratings ”
(Bauer et al., 2009; Bauer and Hann, 2011; Chava, 2013; Oikonomou et al. 2011)
“ ESG criteria are found to provide an insurance
like protection for firms in legitimacy crisis ”
(Godfrey, Merrill and Hansen, 2009)
Fixed Income Funds & ESG Engagement
• Study of 122 ESG integrating Fixed Income funds from 17 countries • Statistical model explains up to 98.3% of funds’ return variation • ESG engagement related characteristics of asset management firm
explain up to 450 basis points performance differential
-1.07% ***
-1.19% ***
-1.19% ***
-0.84% ***
-2.02% *
-0.96% **
1.33% ***
1.45% *** 1.21%
***
0.96% ***
2.55% ***
1.09% ***
-3.00%
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
Engagement Policy Shareholder Activism Voting Policy Voting Policy: ESG issues Approach: Good Signed PRI
Performance influencing characterisitcs
Yes No Difference
[Based on a research project with M. Nilsson]
ESG & Sovereigns: Seeing Greece coming
[Based on a research project with K.B.H. Bouslah, J.M. Linares-Zegarra and A.L. Neher]
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
Moodys
Fitch
S&P
Oekom’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) sovereign rating sensed deterioration in Greece as sovereign much earlier than the Big 3
ESG: Protection against Portugal
[Based on a research project with K.B.H. Bouslah, J.M. Linares-Zegarra and A.L. Neher]
ESG sovereign ratings also much earlier warning signals than Moodys and Fitch re Portugal
Similar results for Ireland, Italy and Spain
ESG & Sovereigns:
statistical results for short term sovereign debt
CONTROL
VARIABLES
(4)
3M, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
(5)
6M, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
(6)
12M, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
oekom
totalrating -0.0203* -0.0132* -0.6935*
GDP p.c. (%) -0.0009** -0.0009* -0.0048
Inflation rate (%) -0.00001 0 -0.0028
Current Account
Balance Rate
(%)
-0.0006 -0005 -0.0169*
External Debt
(%) 0.0001 0 -0.0231
Trade Rate (%) -0.0002 -0.0001 -0.0051
S&P long term,
orthogonalised
(%)
-0.0043* -0.0030** -0.1496*
Constant 0.1112** 0.0836*** 3.1819*
No. observations 267 267 267
R-squared 0.808 0.778 0.564
[Based on a research project with K.B.H. Bouslah, J.M. Linares-Zegarra and A.L. Neher]
Significant relationship between short-, and medium-term government bond rates and ESG-rating
Stronger relationship in case of 12M-matuarity than 3M-, and 6M-matuarity
ESG & Sovereigns:
statistical results for longer term sovereign debt
[Based on a research project with K.B.H. Bouslah, J.M. Linares-Zegarra and A.L. Neher]
Highly significant relationship between long-term government bond rates and ESG-rating
Strongest relationship in case of long-term government bond yields
CONTROL
VARIABLES
(7)
3YR, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
(8)
5YR, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
(9)
10YR, WITH
COUNTRY & YEAR
DUMMIES
oekom
totalrating -0.1951** -0.0934*** -0.0788***
GDP p.c. (%) -0.0015 -0.0013 -0.0015***
Inflation rate (%) -0.0002 0.0004 -0.0002
Current Account
Balance Rate
(%)
-0.0038 -0.0020** -0.0012
External Debt
(%) -0.0038 -0.002 -0.0026
Trade Rate (%) -0.0011 -0.0003 -0.0004*
S&P long term,
orthogonalised
(%)
-0.0416** -0.0196*** -0.0165***
Constant 0.9236** 0.4515*** 0.3889***
No. observations 267 216 266
R-squared 0.691 0.852 0.804
Thank you for your attention
ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
Sustainability Advisory Board, Bank J. Safra Sarasin
Senior Academic Fellow, PRI
Associate Professor of Finance, ICMA Centre, Henley Business School
Director, Sociovestix Labs Social Enterprise
President, ReFine Research Charity
Full list of affiliations on LinkedIn
APPENDIX to STATE of
ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Equities & Fixed Income ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
ESG within Financial
Data Science ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
Current “tools” (i.e. DCF) to find abnormal return opportunities originate from Corporate Finance not Asset Management
Returns are often confused with Price:
Is there a correct, true firm value, if thousands of market participants are arguing about the market valuation every minute?
What is more relevant for the investor? The expected price or the expected change in price?
Many ESG factors are hard to monetarise and hence difficult to integrate into ‘Price’ estimates. They can, however, easily be identified as driver of differential return, as long as firms can be separated on their ESG practices.
Price vs. Return
Current “tools” (i.e. DCF) to find abnormal return opportunities originate from Corporate Finance not Asset Management
Risk is commonly understood as ‘probability of negative events’, however:
current finance practice defines it commonly as ‘probability of deviation from expectation, downwards and upwards’ (i.e. standard deviation, tracking error)
Firms with more ESG conscious business practices have a lower probability of ESG related negative events but are not necessarily harmed in any positive events
Hence: measuring risk accurately as ‘probability of negative events’ is essential to highlight ESG’s competitive advantage in terms of risk adjusted materiality (i.e. semi-standard deviation instead of standard deviation)
Uncertainty vs. Risk
Is standard deviation always ‘risky’?
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00% 30 day rolling standard deviation
How about ‘pure downside deviation’?
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00% 30 day rolling standard deviation / Lower Partial Moment (Benchmark: 0)
Return/Risk ratios in Bull vs. Bear markets
Low Risk Asset High Risk Asset
Bull market
Bear market
Bull market
Bear market
Return 3% -3% 3% -3%
Risk 1% 1% 10% 10%
Sharpe Ratio
+3 -3 +0.3 -0.3
Detailed background
on diversification ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
• Variance term diversified away with number of stocks (1st driver)
• Covariance matrix crucial (Covariancea,b= Correlationa,b * Standard Deviationa * Standard Deviationb)
• Weighted average correlation between assets (2nd driver)
• Weighted average specific risk of assets (3rd driver)
• Tradeoff between 2nd & 3rd driver: In a single covariance term, a reduction of the correlation by 10% has the same effect on portfolio risk than reducing the average standard deviation by 5.13%
jiijijiij
n
j
n
i jijiji
n
j jjn www ,1 1 ,1
22
The 3 drivers of Portfolio Diversification
Environmental,
Social or
Governance
(ESG) Criteria
Portfolio
Diversification
Weighted Average
Correlation of
Portfolio’s Asset
Returns
Number of Assets
in Portfolio
Weighted Average
Specific Risk of
Portfolio’s Assets
(-) (-)
(-)
(+) (-)
(+)
Portfolio Diversification and ESG Criteria: A simple theoretical model
DynamicESG:
Responsible, especially when it matters ANDREAS G. F. HOEPNER
The ‘Corporate Monologue’ Paradigm:
ESG information currently focuses on the behaviour of (listed) corporations
It is adjusted to country or industry of the corporations
It is updated when corporate behaviour changes though this is challenging to observe at a high frequency
It often suffers from self-reporting biases.
But isn’t there some dialogue between corporations and society?
What about societal responsiveness to ESG issues?
Challenge to Status Quo
Can
societal perceptions
change
without a change in company
behaviour?
Challenge to the Status Quo
Trust in major German savings banks
Overall Brand Index (10 days moving average)
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Jan
-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-
08
Sep
-08
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-
09
Sep
-09
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-
10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Commerzbank
Sparkasse
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, C. Palstring and Yougov]
Trust in major German savings &
commercial banks
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Jan
-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-
08
Sep
-08
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-
09
Sep
-09
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-
10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Commerzbank
Deutsche Bank
Volks- und Raiffeisenbank
Sparkasse
Overall Brand Index (10 days moving average)
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, C. Palstring and Yougov]
Do societal perceptions vary across cultures?
Challenge to the Status Quo
Trust in industries by country
United States
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, I. Timofeeva and Edelmann]
Trust in industries by country
United States United Kingdom
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media 0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, I. Timofeeva and Edelmann]
Trust in industries by country
United States United Kingdom
Germany
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media 0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, I. Timofeeva and Edelmann]
Trust in industries by country
United States United Kingdom
Germany China
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media 0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Automotive
Banks
Insurance
Mainstream Media
[Based on a research project with M. Barnett, I. Timofeeva and Edelmann]
Climate Change Conference
[Based on a research project of Sociovestix Labs]
Dynamic ESG recognises the continuous dialogue between corporations and society
Therefore, it conditions individual ESG criteria on the relevance which these criteria have within a society (or country) at a certain point in time
In other words, Dynamic ESG allows to integrate individual ESG criteria into investment processes especially when and where it really matters
Societal relevance can be measured via mainstream media, social media or government preferences
Challenger to Status Quo: Dynamic ESG
Dynamic ESG
The case of Chinese A-shares:
Over 1,600 firms
RepRisk negative news data from thousands of sources
Text-mining of about 80,000 Chinese government statements to measure societal relevance
Statistical Model explains up to 93.4% of the variation in the return data
Societal Relevance of Corporate
Governance
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
Please note, the Beijing Olympics took place between August 8th and 24th 2014
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
May
-07
Jul-
07
Sep
-07
No
v-0
7
Jan
-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-
08
Sep
-08
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-
09
Sep
-09
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-
10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Dynamic ESG
Corporate Governance Index
performance & societal relevance
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
Please note, the Beijing Olympics took place between August 8th and 24th 2014
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
50
100
150
200
250
May
-07
Jul-
07
Sep
-07
No
v-0
7
Jan
-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-
08
Sep
-08
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-
09
Sep
-09
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-
10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Anti-ESG ESG
Corporate Governance
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
Please note, the Beijing Olympics took place between August 8th and 24th 2014
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
May
-07
Jul-
07
Sep
-07
No
v-0
7
Jan
-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-
08
Sep
-08
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-
09
Sep
-09
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-
10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Dynamic Anti-ESG Anti-ESG ESG Dynamic ESG
Corporate Environmental
Responsibility
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Feb
-07
Ap
r-0
7
Jun
-07
Au
g-0
7
Oct
-07
Dec
-07
Feb
-08
Ap
r-0
8
Jun
-08
Au
g-0
8
Oct
-08
Dec
-08
Feb
-09
Ap
r-0
9
Jun
-09
Au
g-0
9
Oct
-09
Dec
-09
Feb
-10
Ap
r-1
0
Jun
-10
Au
g-1
0
Oct
-10
Dec
-10
Feb
-11
Ap
r-1
1
Jun
-11
Au
g-1
1
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Dynamic Anti-ESG Anti-ESG ESG Dynamic ESG
Corporate Social Responsibility
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400 Fe
b-0
7
Ap
r-0
7
Jun
-07
Au
g-0
7
Oct
-07
Dec
-07
Feb
-08
Ap
r-0
8
Jun
-08
Au
g-0
8
Oct
-08
Dec
-08
Feb
-09
Ap
r-0
9
Jun
-09
Au
g-0
9
Oct
-09
Dec
-09
Feb
-10
Ap
r-1
0
Jun
-10
Au
g-1
0
Oct
-10
Dec
-10
Feb
-11
Ap
r-1
1
Jun
-11
Au
g-1
1
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Dynamic 2-Sigma Anti-ESG Dynamic Anti-ESG Anti-ESG
ESG Dynamic ESG Dynamic 2-Sigma ESG
Corporate Legal Responsibility
[Based on a research project with Q. Li]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350 Fe
b-0
7
Ap
r-0
7
Jun
-07
Au
g-0
7
Oct
-07
Dec
-07
Feb
-08
Ap
r-0
8
Jun
-08
Au
g-0
8
Oct
-08
Dec
-08
Feb
-09
Ap
r-0
9
Jun
-09
Au
g-0
9
Oct
-09
Dec
-09
Feb
-10
Ap
r-1
0
Jun
-10
Au
g-1
0
Oct
-10
Dec
-10
Feb
-11
Ap
r-1
1
Jun
-11
Au
g-1
1
Go
vern
me
nt
Inte
rest
s In
de
x
Po
rtfo
lio V
alu
e
Government Interests Dynamic 2-Sigma Anti-ESG Dynamic Anti-ESG Anti-ESG
ESG Dynamic ESG Dynamic 2-Sigma ESG