63
Research Assessment for Ranking Purposes Dr. Walid Hassan Head of Consultancy Services and Client Education Clarivate Analytics 2018

Research Assessment for Ranking Purposes

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Research Assessment for Ranking Purposes

Dr. Walid HassanHead of Consultancy Services and Client Education

Clarivate Analytics 2018

2

The world of today: major challenges and opportunities

Data growing in volume and

complexity

Cyber threats and data privacy

compliance

Difficulty predicting the future amidst constant change

Doing morewith less

Knowing who to partner with

and how

Interdisciplinary data for research

“Free information”/ open science/

open data

AI / text mining

Globalization & regionalization

Spotting emerging research trends

Clarivate operates at the center of the innovation lifecycle

4

Scientific and academic research

Patent research intelligenceIndustry codes and standards

Life sciences intelligence

Trademark researchand protection

Domain and brand protection Intellectual property management

A portfolio of trusted brands

5

More than a century and a half of trusted insights

BIOSIS founded by Society of Bacteriologists and Botanical SocietySCIENTIFIC AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH

Zoological Records founded by

Zoological Society of London and

British MuseumSCIENTIFIC AND

ACADEMIC RESEARCH

Dr. Eugene Garfield invents citation indexing

and searchingSCIENTIFIC AND

ACADEMIC RESEARCH

Monty Hyams begins selling patent bulletins

from his home, DerwentIP AND STANDARDS

ISI foundedSCIENTIFIC AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH

1864

1926

1955

1957

1963 1980s

1997

2011

2012

2016

2017

Thomson acquired trademark research companies Thomson & Thomson and COMPUMARK

Web of Science launchedSCIENTIFIC AND

ACADEMIC RESEARCH

Cortellis launchedLIFE SCIENCES

Thomson Reuters acquired

MARKMONITOR

Clarivate Analytics launched, following sale of Thomson Reuters Intellectual Property and Science businessCLARIVATE ANALYTICS

Publons acquiredSCIENTIFIC AND

ACADEMIC RESEARCH

6

Businesses run on Clarivate Analytics insights

Academicinstitutions

Commercialenterprises

Governments 49 of the top 50 pharma companies use Cortellis

More than half of Fortune 100 uses MarkMonitor

9 in 10 of the world’s most valuable brands use CompuMark

40+Patent issuing authorities worldwide use

Derwent World Patents Index

1 billioncited references are accessible through Web of Science

Universities should be about more thandeveloping work skills. They must alsobe about producing civic-minded andcritically engaged citizens

Dr. Henry Giroux

8

Agenda

Why University ranking?What are the main ranking systems?Diagnosis of the research-dose in the ranking systemsHow to boost ranking via “better” researchStrategize and mobilize your research activitiesCase Study

9

Why Universities rankings?

Attract best researchers

Get more governmental funding

Attract more students, better financial situation

Gain an international profile and complete the institution portfolio

10

What are the main ranking systems?

Rank

ing

Agen

cies

/Ass

ocia

tions

Magazines

Newspapers

Websites

Governments

Academics

11

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Shanghai (ARWU)1. Quality of education (Nobel prizes and field medals)2. Quality of faculty (Prizes and highly cited researchers)3. Research output4. Per capita performance

12

Diagnosis of ranking systems

13

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Research-dose in Shanghai (ARWU)

1. Number of indexed publications: 20%2. Highly cited researchers: 20%3. Articles in Nature or Science: 20%

14

Diagnosis of ranking systems

TIMES higher education

1. Teaching2. Research3. Citations4. Industry Income5. International outlook

15

Diagnosis of ranking systems

16

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Direct Research dose in TIMES higher education

1. Research: 30%2. Citations: 30%3. Number of articles with international collaborations: 2.5%

17

Diagnosis of ranking systems

QS1. Academic reputation: 40%2. Employer reputation: 10%3. Faculty students ratio: 20% 4. International faculty: 5%5. International students: 5%6. Citations per faculty: 20%

18

Diagnosis of ranking systems

CWTS Leiden Ranking

1. Largest number of Publications2. Mean citation score3. Proportion of top 10% of publications

19

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Research dose in CWTS Leiden Ranking (100%)

1. Number of publications2. Number of citations3. Number of articles with international/industrial/etc. collaboration4. Number/percent of articles in the most cited position

20

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Reuters

Solely on Research Articles and Patents !

21

Diagnosis of ranking systems

Research dose in Reuters

1. Number of publications2. Number of citations3. Number of articles with industry collaboration4. Industry articles citation5. Patents filled6. Patents awarded7. Patents filled globally8. Number of publications cited by patents9. Percent of Industry Collaborative Articles

22

Rethinking: Where all starts

Benchmarking

BENCHMARKING

The main Pillar of Strategic Planning

24

BENCHMARKINGBENCHMARKING

Strategizing the Step from A to B

Check Strategic Planning Services Provided by Clarivate Analytics

25

BENCHMARKING IN RESEARCH

26

GOALS AND OBJECTIVESIn

puts Human

Resources

Funding

Facilities

Administration

Social Capital

Activ

ities Research

Education & Training

Partnership

Recruitment

Thought Leadership

Out

puts Publications

Graduates

Collaborations

Innovation

New Resources

Out

com

es Scientific Impact

Societal Impact

International Reputation

Increased Funding

27KPI’s

28

PLANNING

ARE WE DOINGTHE RIGHT THING?

• Theory Evaluations• Mission statement

development• Needs assessments• Strategic planning

ARE WE DOINGTHE RIGHT THING, SURE?

• Process Evaluations• Regular progress reports• Monitoring databases and

user interface systems• Resource usage tracking

WHAT WE CAN DO TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

• Outcome Evaluations• Output tracking• Performance

benchmarking• Longitudinal attribution

29

Who are the stakeholders?

Executives

Researchers

Funders

Partners

Public

What domains are being addressed?

Need

Design

Implementation

Impact and outcome

Efficiency

How is the information presented?

Summary

Detailed report

Presentation

Infographic

Campaign

What are the expected returns?

Awareness

Advocacy

Accountability

Action

Assets

CAPITALISE

30Research Organization Challenges

ResearcherProfiles

ResearchOutput Funders

Collaboration Workflow Reporting

Check CONVERIS solution Provided by Clarivate Analytics

31

Teaching Citations Publications

Patents Reputation Income

International Collaboration

Industrial Collaboration

Employer feedback

Faculty/students ratio Nobel prizes Field medals

Pool of Criteria

Opportunity !

32

Challenges and Repartition

The Start Point for a Researcher

Researchers are challenged at the first moment, when defining their research subject area

34

Topics Strategy

35 USD billions has been wasted developing things thatare already documented in a patentspecification.(Source: British Patent Office, 2000)

35Patents Versus Publications

36

Take a Breathe – 3 mins

R&D Strategy

38

Types of Research

39Pathway from Research to IP, Strategy

Fundamental

Publications

Citations, Visibility

Research Community (Academia)

Applied

Patents

Licensing

Industry

Theories, methodologies

Applications

IPKnow HowVa

luat

ion

40

Positioning of needs: University

41

University: Opportunities and Challenges

42

State of Art and Positioning of needs: Industry

43

University and Industry

44

Research Output

45Citations: coins of research

EUGENE GARFIELD’S “ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS INDEX”

Check Web of Science Provided by Clarivate Analytics

46Impact Relative to World

Impact Relative to World:

Citation impact of the set of publications as a ratio of world average

47

Normalized Citation Impact

The Normalized Citation Impact (NCI) of a document is calculated by dividing the actual count of citing items by the expected citation rate for documents with the same document type, year of publication and subject area.

For a single paper that is only assigned to one subject area:

For a single paper that is assigned to multiple subjects:

For a group of papers, the NCI value is the average of the values for each of the papers:

Check INCITES Provided by Clarivate Analytics

48REPUTATION INDICATORS

49

Research Output

50

Working on Ranking

Case Study: Research Score

51

ARW: Ranking Versus Publications

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

52

Concentration

y = -137.34x + 8640R² = 0.063

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

0 5 10 15 20 25

Num

ber o

f Pub

licat

ions

Shanghai Ranking

53

THE ranking

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

54

THE- Concentration

y = -64.275x + 7679.7R² = 0.0135

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

0 5 10 15 20 25

Num

ber o

f Pub

licat

ions

THE Ranking

55

Affinity WOS- Shanghai Ranking

56

Affinity WOS- THE

57Shanghai and Research Quality

58

THE and Research Quality

59

QScore - Shanghai

QScore =4*Q1+3*Q2+2*Q3+1*Q4

60

THE- QScore

QScore =4*Q1+3*Q2+2*Q3+1*Q4

61

QScore per Ranking

62

Dr. Walid Hassan: [email protected]

Linked In: Walid HASSAN, Phd

Twitter: @Walid_Hassan_TR