8
Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Reproducibility ofNL ASEP proposal

Prepared by the Netherlands

ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Page 2: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Spread in limit values NL approachautomatic gearbox

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

normalised engine speed at BB

Lmax

in d

B(A

)

Lmax

L_ASEP_NL_BB

Lwot_i

n_norm_Lmax_borderinstitution 100, vehicle 8, gear D

NL ASEP approach, BB is limit value based, BB_wot is Lwot_i based

• Example 2: 6 dB spread in NL limit value

Page 3: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Spread in limit values NL approachmanual gearbox

• Example 1: 2,5 dB spread in NL limit value

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

normalised engine speed at BB

Lma

x in

dB

(A)

Lmax

L_ASEP_NL_BB

Lwot_i

n_norm_Lmax_border

institution 200, vehicle 5, gear 3

NL ASEP approach, BB is limit value based, BB_wot is Lwot_i based

Page 4: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Reason for spread in NL limit value:

• LimitNL,ASEP = Limitannex 3 +

4*(aASEP test –aurban,annex 3) +

0,3*(vBB,ASEP test - 50)

• spread in measured acceleration values (aASEP test) causes spread in limit values

Page 5: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Accelerations as we expected

– Nearly independent from engine speed– PP-BB max 10% higher than AA-BB– Good reproducibility

2,5

2,6

2,7

2,8

2,9

3,0

3,1

3,2

3,3

3,4

3,5

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

engine speed (%S at BB)

acc

ele

ratio

n (

m/s

2) AA-BB

PP-BB

Page 6: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Accelerations as we see them

AT; delay and shifting behind PP

MT: PP-BB lower than AA-BB

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%engine speed (%S at BB)

acc

ele

ratio

n (

m/s

2) AA-BB

PP-BB

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

5,0

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%engine speed (%s at BB)

acc

ele

ratio

n (

m/s

2) AA-BB

PP-BB

1,5

1,7

1,9

2,1

2,3

2,5

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

engine speed (%S at BB)

acc

ele

ratio

n (

m/s

2) AA-BB

PP-BB

2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%engine speed (%s at BB)

acc

ele

ratio

n (

m/s

2)

AA-BB

PP-BB

MT: spread PP-BB 10%, spread AA-BB 30%

MT: AA-BB 40% lower than PP-BB

Page 7: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Why is there spread in acceleration?

Potential reasons:• No flat torque curve• Acceleration delay in track (esp Turbo and automatics)• Shifting of automatic gearboxes• Too little pre-acceleration• Too late depressing of accelerator• Too early releasing of accelerator• Errors in alignment of lines AA’, PP’ and BB’

– Place of light barriers– Length of vehicle

Page 8: Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA

Possibilities to improve reproducibility of acceleration measurements

• Always take aPP-BB instead of aAA-BB

• Prescribe overdoses pre-acceleration to be sure that the vehicle indeed uses its full acceleration potential (and check)

• Set boundaries to difference aPP-BB - aAA-BB