5

sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as
Page 2: sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as
Page 3: sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as
Page 4: sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as
Page 5: sealang.netsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/saxena1989ergative.pdfrepresents the colloquial Tibetan of that era (DeLancey, p.c.). Therefore it is neither classified as Tibetan nor as