Upload
brett-clark
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reporting on performance in establishing and operating the Shared Environmental Information
System
16th session of the Working Group on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Istanbul, Turkey, 16-17 April 2015
Lukasz Wyrowski, Manager, UNECE Programme on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Phase II
Phase III
Initial phase – understand where gaps areDevelopment phase – eliminate gapsOperational phase – operate in a sustainable way
Phase I
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
2015 mid-2016EfE Conference 2020
End 2015
Effec
tive
oper
ation
New flowsimplementedperformance indicator 3.2
End 2020Full set timely
produced and sharedperformance indicator 3.1
Roadmap
end 2015/end 2020
Now
mid 2015/mid-2016
Definition of specific outputs - performance
indicator 1.2
Gaps identification - performance indicator 1.1
Roadmap
Phase I Phase II Phase III
ActionsA1-A3, B1-B3, C1-C3
of Phase IPhase IIPhase III
Reporting forms / reporting tools to be provided before the first reporting round
Timely implementation of outputs –
performance indicator 2
Reporting tool
follows performance indicators and targets
common
user-friendly
concise but precise
informative
user-friendlyno extensive consultations
required
short period of time for reporting
… performance evaluation for each data flow and for all flows as aggregated average
… identified gaps (content, networks, infrastructure)
… performance changes over time
Concept for the reporting tool
Underlying thinking - Production and Sharing
- Data are produced in accordance with agreed methodologies and methods
- Data are regularly updated, accessible on-line and presented in a clear manner
On-line availability and accessibility:
Concept for the reporting tool
On-line availability and Identificationaccessibility not ensured of possible gaps
Support questions:• linked to SEIS building blocks (content,
institutional cooperation, infrastructure)• linked to targets and specific actions formulated
under SEIS performance indicators• cross-check function• show logical stream
Concept for the reporting tool
Logical stream of questions:
Concept for the reporting tool
Issues for consideration:
1. Which should be the reporting tool for evaluating SEIS implementation and operation based on the targets and performance indicators? How can it be made user-friendly and simple in use so that it would not require extensive national reporting consultations?
Issues for consideration:
2. How should the progress in SEIS establishment be reviewed in 2015, assuming that the development of the reporting tool would take time? Should there be a manual review for a sample group of countries for 2015 in accordance with the agreed concept?
Issues for consideration:
3. Which should be the modalities of work of the Working Group, so that it can provide timely its initial report on the implementation and operation of SEIS to the Committee on Environmental Policy at its upcoming twenty-first session?