Report on Magnetic Survey Gold Rock Prospect Kenora Mining

2.4503 BOYER LAKE010

Report on Magnetic SurveyGold Rock Prospect

Kenora Mining Division

January 20, 1982 Peter J. Vamos, P.Eng.

-2-

GENERAL GEOLOGY:

The Gold Rock area where the property is located is mainly underlain by volcanic rocks of intermediate to mafic composition which are intercalated by felsic flows. The vein system which is the host of the mineralization, appears to be associated with strikes northeast at AS and dips nearly vertically. Gold was found along narrow veins of extensive length. These features are said to occur within a stratigraphic horizon of volcanic rocks. They are rich in gold content and are predominatly of quartz with minor amounts of pyrite and chalcopyrite and galena.

DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED:

The baseline was set at 40 and was cut to a length of 3,200ms with 0+00 positioned near the south end. Lines were turned cut at 100m centers, they were chained and picketed at 20m intervals. A Geometric G 816 Proton magnetometer was used, readings were taken at each station. Base stations were established corrections for the diurnal variations were made and the values were plotted on the accompanying map. This map was drawn to the scale of 1:2,500 with a base of 59,000 gammas, contour intervals were selected at 100 gammas.

The resulting contour map has confirmed the earlier statements of dominating northeasterly directions. Several low magnetic anomalies have been located. They usually peak at 400 - 500 gammas over the background of roughly 1,000 gammas. These features are usually narrow and in the 300 - 400m length range. Usually straight and steeply dipping. Only three anomalies of medium range were located on the grid, though there are indications of others but they are identified on one line only before leaving the property.

The anomalies found on the property are mostly on the north half. The first is near to the baseline on the east side between lines 19 N and 22 N. Peak value here is almost a thousand gammas over the background. This anomaly is likely due to sulphide mineralization. The second moderately strong anomaly is about on the same lines (18 N - 22 N) west of the baseline on the shore of the small pond located on the edge of the claim group. The peak value here is 2,600 gammas, it is likely due to the same causes as the first anomaly. The third anomaly is next to the north boundary and extends from the claims to the north. Located on line 27 N to 29 N peak values are at 1,400 gammas.

High magnetic readings were found on lines 7 N, 11 N and 16 N. All these anomalies continue off our present grid.

There is no significant sign of any folding down by the survey, though some minor faulting maybe possible.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We are recommending that the results of the electromagnetic be interpreted with special attention given to areas of interest on the magnetic plan. Specific recommendations regarding further follow up will be Included in the report on the electromagnetic survey.

Peter J. Vamos, P.Eng.

INTRODUCTION:

The property was staked for Mr. Milton Kirsh in 1980 and 1981 to secure an area which had gold occurrences reported in the past. Field work was completed in the same year.

This report deals with the results of the magnetic survey. A second report which will be discussing the results of the electromagnetic survey is in preparatory stage.

SUMMARY:

Field work started during the spring of 1981. After linecutting was completed a magnetic and VLF electromagnetic survey was done. Several moderate magnetic anomalies were located which are briefly evaluated here, recommendations for follow up will be made in the report covering the electromagnetic survey.

PROPERTY, LOCATION AND ACCESS:

The property consists of twenty-one staked contiguous mining claims all in the Boyer Lake Area of the Kenora Mining Division. The claims are shown on the Plan No. M-2582 of the Ministry of Natural Resources and are in the northwest quarter of the map area, west of Highway 502, just north of Kabaguski Lake. Claim numbers are as follows:

K 350900 (Held under option)K 526530 K 541651

526531 541652526532 544160526533 544161526534 544162526535 544163541650 544164

K 544165544166544167544168544169544170

The property is accessible on land via Highway 502, a paved all weather road linking the Town of Dryden with Fort Frances. The Highway passes about 1/2 mile east of the property. An old bush road can be utilized to reach the claims from the Highway, the road, more like a trail, can be utilized in the winter using a snow vehicle, in the summer the deep ruts and a creek which crosses the trail may be serious obstacles even for a four wheel drive vehicle.

HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK:

Gold mining in the area dates back to the turn of the century, consequently the information available from these days is somewhat fragmentory. According to a report written for the company by H. Grant Harper, P.Eng. the property was first explored in the early I900's, a shaft was sunk to a depth of 315 feet with minor lateral work on three levels. A second much shallower shaft was also sunk approximately 500 feet south of the first shaft. In around 1904 the project closed down. Re-opened in 1938 the mine workings were rehabilitated and some sampling took place, a drill program in 1965 totalled 2,439 feet. The last work done was in 1974 when two short holes were drilled.

• II •»!••••... —— __-

52F87NE&864 3.4583 BOYER LAKE900

1983 02 17 2.4503

Resident GeologistMinistry of Natural ResourcesBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir: ^

Enclosed for your records 1s a duplicate copy of a magnetometer survey-report that has been approved for assessment work credits on Mining Claims K 526530 et al 1n the Boyer Lake Area.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

MMtney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

P.M. Matthews:sc

Ends:

1983 02 17 2.4503

Mr. Milton K1rsh 644 Briar HI11 Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5N 1N2

Dear Mr. Klrsh:

I have today authorized the Mining Recorder to cancel the electromagnetic work credits that you recorded on December 14 and 24, 1981 on each of the following claims:

K 526530-31-32-34-35 K 544562 to 70 Inclusive K 526533 K 544160 K 541650*51

I expect that this cancellation will place your claims In default and recommend therefore, that you contact the Mining Recorder to determine the status of your claims.

Yours very truly.


UMtney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

F.W. Matthews:sc

cc: Mining Recorder Kenora, Ontario

1983 02 17

File: 2 .4503

Mr. Wade MathewsMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Mft. Milton K1rsh, the holder of the mining claims on the attached "Notification of Recording of Assessment Work Credits" (beneficial holder of K 541650-51) did not provide an electromagnetic survey report within the 60 day period following the recording of the work with you on December 14 and 24, 1981. You are hereby authorized to delete the electromagnetic work credits recorded against each of the following mining claims:

K 526530-31-32-34-35 K 544562 to 70 Inclusive K 526533 K 544160 K 541650-51

I have had an opportunity to see recent abstracts of these claims and I note that relief from forfeiture and extensions were allowed on these claims. The Mining Commissioner Informs me that he made his orders based on the work credits shown on the abstracts that were neither confirmed or rejected at that time. It would seem to me that the deletion of the electromagnetic credits places the claims In default as of February of 1982 regardless of the Commissioner's Orders,

Although there 1s no question that the onus of filing his survey report on time rested with Mr* Klrsh there his been some confusion and perhaps he was led to believe that his claims were valid byu reason of the Commissioner's Orders and by virtue of our not notifying you of his failure to supply the reports back 1n 1982.

If you cancel the claims I would suggest that, considering the circumstances* 1t would not be unreasonable to Inform Mr. Klrsh Immediately by telephone (416-781-9938) Of your action and tell him when the claims will be open for restaMng.

With respect to my Notice of Intent dated 1983.01.13 concerning

Hr. Wade Nathews Mining Recorder Kenora1983 02 17 Page 2.

magnetometer credits for each of these claims you may consider this letter as notice of final approval for the purpose of finalizing the entries on your record sheets.

Yours very truly,


WMtney Block/ Room 6450 Queen's Park, Toronto, Telephone: 416/965-1380

F.W. Matthews:sc

Ends:

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Lands Administration Branch

Mining Lands Section

Ministry of Natural Resources

Room 161 7, Whitney Block

Queen's Park, Toronto

M7A 1W3

Notification of recording

of assessment work credits

RECEIVEDJAN - 81982

MINING LANDS SECTION

Date of recording of work:. December 14, 1981

Recorded holder:_ Milton Kirsh

Address- 644 Briar Hill Ave. Toronto, Ontario M5N 1N2

Township or Area: Lake M-2482

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Mining claims

Geophysical

Electromagnetic-

Magnetometer-

Radiometric_

Induced polarization.

Section 86 (18)_

Geological____

Geochemical__

Man days

Special provision

*20.days

-days

Jays

_riays

_days

_days

-days

Airborne d

Ground Ljjj

K.526530-31-32-34-35 K. 544562-70inclusive*K.526533 - 10 days*K.544160 - 10 days

Notice to recorded holder:

LXJ Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.

D Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.

ActingMining recorder /

c.c.Milton Kirsh

79S (6/77) LA. 065

Ontario







Room 1617,Whitney Block

Oueen's Park, Toronto

M7A 1W3

RECEIVEDJAN 2 81982

MINING LANDS SECTION

Date of recording of work: ... ______ §

Recorded holder:.

ceinber241981

Address: 1 Massey Square Apt. 1216, TORONTO, Ontario MAC 5L4

Township o r Area: B°yer ^ke M-2582 ____________________________


Mining claims

Geophysical

Electromagnetic-

Magnetometer_

Radiometric__

-days K. 541650-51

-days

Jays

Induced polarization-

Section 86 (18)__

Geological_____

Geochemical__

-days

_days

_days

Jays

Man days D

Special provision CD

Airborne D

Ground D


Q Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.

CH Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.

dining recorder

c.c. E. M. 'Hall

792 (6/77) LA. 065

Ontario







Room 1617, Whitney Block

Queen's Park, Toronto

M7A 1W3

IAHDS acnoK

Date of recording of work:. December 14, 1981

Recorded holder:. Milton Kirsh

Address:. 644 Briar Hill Avenue, Toronto, Ontario MSN 1N2

Township or Area: Boyer Lake Area M-2582


Mining claims

Geophysical

Electromagnetic-

Magnetometer_

Radiometric__


Section 86 (18)_

Geological_____

Geochemical.

Man days LJ

Special provision Qjjj

.days

40

K.526530-35 inclusive K. 544160 Qj^As/cAUA K. 544162-70 inclusive

-days

-days

_days

jdays

Jays

_days

Airborne CD

Ground JH


Qc Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with

in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.

CD Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.

Acting M ining recorder 7

c.c.Milton Kirsh

7BS (6/77) LA. 065

December 21, 1982

Mr. Milton K1rsh 644 Briar Hill Avenue Toronto. Ontario MSN 1N2

Dear Sir:

Enclosed Is a copy of a repott of work for Electromagnetic assessment work credits that was recorded by the recorder on December 14. 1981 on Mining Claims K 526530 et al In the Area of Boyer Lake.

He have no record that you provided the full reports and maps to the Minister within the sixty day tprlod provided by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

Unless you can provide evidence that the reports and maps were submitted as required by January 3. 1983 the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on December 14, 1981,

For further Information, please contect Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,


Whltney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

Dlane Mice

Encl.

cc: Mining Recorder Kenora, Ontario

VV

4i.- : *

3


Ontario

1983 0 1 1 3

Your (He:

Our file: 2 .4503

Mining RecorderM1n1stryoof Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent

to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

Yours very truly,For further Information, 1f required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at

=• * A * 416/965-1380E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM?A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

A. Barrtsc

cc: Mr. Milton K1rsh Toronto, Ontario

cc: Mr. Evald Monty Hall Toronto, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining & Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845 (6/79)


Notice of Intent

for Technical ReportsOntario

1983 01 13

2.4503

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 <S2fS I

Ministry of Natural

>urcesOntario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

File

2 45Q3

Recorded Holder

MILTON KIRSHTownship or Area

BOYER LAKE AREA

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining C laims AssatMd

Geophysical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer.

Radiometric_

40


Section 86 (18)_

Geological ___

Geochemical.

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

K 526530 to 32 Inclusive 526534-35 544162 to 70 Inclusive

Man days

Special provision

Airborne LJ

Ground E

CD Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

29 .days

K< 526533

30 days

K 544160

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

I_I not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(18)-60:

828

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalR^purces

Technical Assessment Work Credits

File

2.4503

Recorded Holder

EVALD MONTY HALLTownship or Area

BOYER LAKE

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Attested

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer _

Radiometric __

40

Induced polarization,

Section 86 (18)_

Geological ___

Geochemical

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

K 541650-51

Man days CD

Special provision O

Airborne

Ground

CD Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

n Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

L_l not sufficiently covered by the survey

No E.M. credits

D Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(18)-60:

828

Geou/chnicalHtportAppjroval

rr,.i

L

Mining Lands Comments

fo: Geophysics

Commenu

Si x:F -,

Wish to see again with correctionsDIM Signature

o: Geology- Expenditures

Cornmentt

|~J Approved [~] Wish to see again with correctionsDaM Signature

To: Geochemistry

Approved f~j Wish to see again with correction!

[ JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

February 9, 1982 2.4503

Office of the Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resource! 808 Robertson Street Box 5160 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9

Dear Sirt

We have received reports for a Geophysical (Magnetooeter) Survey subnitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claim K.526530 at al in the Area of Boyer Lake. However, we have not received naps, in duplicate, to accompany this survey. Please submit these.

Upon receipt of the above-mentioned information, a statement of assessment work credits will be issued*

Yours very truly,


Uhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

J. Skura/bk

cct Milton KirshToronto, Ontario

cci Peter J. Vamos Toronto, Ontario

PETER J. VAMOS

Suite 600 - 65 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M5H 2M5 Phone (416) 361-0402 Telex 06-22016 Panafax (416) 864-1809

January 25, 1982.

Mr. F. W. Matthews, Ministry of Natural Resources, Lands Administration Branch, Whitney Block, Toronto, Ontario.

Dear Mr. Matthews:

Enclosed please find report on linecutting and Magnetic Survey done for Mr. Milton Kirsh, the recorded holder of the property. A contour map covering the area will be also sent to your office shortly.

Field work on a VLF Survey is complete. The results presently being plotted, will be forwarded in the near future.

Sincerely yours,

PJV/rk Peter J. Vamos, P.Eng. Encl.

Ontario


GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Sui Township o Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of I Address of Covering Dz

Total Miles

SPECIAL

«,y{.) Magneticr Ar«, B°yer Lake Area

pr/.\ Milton Kirsh ci ^ s;. ——————————————————————————————————————

ipany M

Report P

. Hall

. Vamos

Author 946 Lawrence Ave.East, Don Mills, Ont,

»tes of Surv

of Line Cut

PROVISICCREDITS REQUEST

ey June-October, 1981

28.65

|N§ rED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNE CREDITSMagnetome

DATE:

Res.Geol._

ier

(linecutting to office)km

DAYS

Geophysical per ° m

40\

— Rfldi^'TKtri''. ,-Ofher

r..^mi,a i

(Special provision crediti do not apply to airborne surveyi)

Electromagi(enter c

SIGW

f\f\\r , ..R^Hjnnr'trir ,lays per claim)

fl-lTRF,: u , r.—.Author of Report or Agent

J //{•>)/ Qualifications ff^ 1 1 H ,J 1

Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

^ K-350900»~,X -/vstfJ U>6^ '(prefix) -^,

526530

526531

526532.

526533

526534

526535

, (number)

X

x

$\

/541650 X^

\ 541651 XSNMUUUU *r

541*52 SJlJ' f Y

C^^^H^^D 4 4101 f̂--~~

544162*

544163

544164

544165

544166

544167

544168

544169^

544170-g^tjl^^^

*..<„.........................

V

XX

Sx[x

J F̂

TOTAL CLAIMS 21

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations 143°__________________Number of Readings 143°Station interval ______f-Om___________________Ljne spacing________100mProfile scale__________________________________________________ . 100 gammasContour interval _______________________________________________

, . . Geometric G 816Instrument ________________________________________________L.

£2; C

Izo

O

C/5

constant _______* * gammaDiurnal correction method ______Base station

2-3Base Station check-in interval (hours).Base Station location and value Along baseline

InstrumentCoil configuration ____________________—————————————————————————————————————

Coil separation ___________________________________________________________

Accuracy —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line CD Parallel line

Frequency—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— .. ( specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured.

Instrument.

Scale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument _——————————————————————————————————————————————_ Method CD Time Domain D Frequency Domaino ———

p Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency ————— N >-. — Off time ___________________________ Range ————————

— Delay time ________________——————————— Integration time.

Power.Q £Electrode array.

Electrode spacing.

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ___________________________________________

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.

Values measured.

Energy windows (levels) _____________________________________

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector_______^_____________________________________

Overburden _______________________________________________(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey_________________________

Instrument ___________________________.

Accuracy____________________________.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)____

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy__________________(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used________________________________Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only_

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight———————

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per centp. p.m. p. p. b.

a a a

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others __________________________Field Analysis (..

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. (___________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used__

Commercial Laboratory (_ Name of Laboratory__ Extraction Method— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ____

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General- General •

Turtlepond Lake - M.2663

49°30'fK ' K!N$v T^Ki~*tl I6S467« 5JSSJ9 , ^SWMO1 8S4«8B ' 6S4 6 I 87 '- - ~ _^____ -J -. -.-fc^j^L- _ _ _ -|^ - - -j -I

|6033i6|60333S,K~~" ~~

l603337| I

.--r- - | 5 '" 9 ° l i-- -,- - — -K r~- -I K v K

,'96,369 | 5«'36«|5 8|S68 (96I3$7 \ BSI366 I

MtOTO|B8tOS« 6 o07»0|l «OOTe9|so07.

j 544165 544166 | 544169

IK h ~ l K > ~

ShongwOShu \ fl

r- -f.i 1487279 I 487280 j

. L . K

I 627 280 l6Z7249l627a4BI 627247 i

K i K , K - K ~I

594331 , 594330 I 594328 j 594324

594333 * 594334 > 594329 ,594326 'K | K IK I K59t336 | 594335 I 594328 IS94327 I

I I

ro N if)OJ

i o>O

aE o o»0>u> o

I

49°22'30'^)6?9|

49°22'30"

43 42' 40' 39' 38' 37 36' •ss 1 34'33 32 31 o*/V92°30

52F»7NEIW64~ 2V4S93Meggisi Lake - M.2553

BCh 200 494923

AREA OF

BOYER LAKEDISTRICT OF

KENORA

KENORA MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH-40 CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLY

JbJBBfifc. WSHTS ONLY ROADSIMPROVED ROADS KING'S HIGHWAYS RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINESCANCELLED PATENTED S.R 0

or (® C.S.

O Loc.L.O.

M.R.O SRO

^c e

NOTES400' surface rights reservation along the shores of oil lakes and rivers.

Ar«a> withdrawn from staking under Section 43 of the Mining Act ( R 5 0 1970)

Order No. F ile Date Disposition

DATE OF ISSUE

MOV 2 9 1882Ministry of Naiural Resource!

TORONTO

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 52 F 7

PLAN NO M-2582ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

SASAKWEI

III IIIIPII i »•••»...........SaF»7NEMB4 3 .4M3 POYER LAKE

AST

LEGEND

l06* Total magnetic field less 59,000 gammas (corrected)

Magnetic contours

Mag. low

O Control stations

Claim Line

O Claim post

INSTRUMENT- Geometries G8I6 Proton

CONTOUR INTERVAL' 100 gammas

OPERATOR . K. ANTILLA

Magnetometer

Scale= 1-2500

zoo

METERS

ARI RESOURCES LTD

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYBOYER LAKE

DISTRICT OF KENORA ONTARIO

NTS 52 F/7

DATE- November, 1981 BY- EM HALL MAP No

Documents

Report on Magnetic Survey Gold Rock Prospect Kenora Mining