4
REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW 1 Bulacan State University Atty. David Robert C. Aquino, CSEE INSTRUCTIONS: 1. The cases below deal with what we discussed last meeting (Preparation of the complaint and service of summons); 2. Divide the cases among yourselves. Considering the number of cases, some may be assigned more than the others; 3. Prepare a digest of your assigned case which shall be reported to class next meeting. Reporting is limited to only 3 minutes per report; and 4. Focus on the topic (Preparation of a complaint to Service of Summons) in your digest. CASES: 1. NOPA v. Judge of RTC-Negros Occidental, G.R. No. 179878, December 24, 2008, 575 SCRA 575; 2. Topacio v. Justice Ong, 574 SCRA 817; 3. Sari- Sari Group of Companies, Inc. v. Piglas-Kamao, 561 SCRA 569; 4. Altres v. Empleo, G.R. No. 180986, December 10, 2008, 573 SCRA 583; 5. United Paragon Mining v. CA, G.R. No. 150959, August 4, 2006, 497 SCRA 638; 6. Heirs of Lonoy v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R. No. 175049, November 27, 2008, 572 SCRA 185; 7. Philippine Bank of Commerce v. Macadaeg, 109 Phil. 981 [1960]; 8. Buenaventura v. Uy, G.R. No. 28156, March 31, 1987, 149 SCRA 22; 9. Vicar International v. FEB Leasing, G.R. No. 157195, April 22, 2005, 456 SCRA 588; 10. Uy v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, G.R. No. 43389, April 28, 1980, 97 SCRA 255; 1

RemRev1 Cases

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

list

Citation preview

Page 1: RemRev1 Cases

REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW 1Bulacan State UniversityAtty. David Robert C. Aquino, CSEE

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. The cases below deal with what we discussed last meeting (Preparation of the complaint and service of summons);

2. Divide the cases among yourselves. Considering the number of cases, some may be assigned more than the others;

3. Prepare a digest of your assigned case which shall be reported to class next meeting. Reporting is limited to only 3 minutes per report; and

4. Focus on the topic (Preparation of a complaint to Service of Summons) in your digest.

CASES:

1. NOPA v. Judge of RTC-Negros Occidental, G.R. No. 179878, December 24, 2008, 575 SCRA 575;

2. Topacio v. Justice Ong, 574 SCRA 817;

3. Sari- Sari Group of Companies, Inc. v. Piglas-Kamao, 561 SCRA 569;

4. Altres v. Empleo, G.R. No. 180986, December 10, 2008, 573 SCRA 583;

5. United Paragon Mining v. CA, G.R. No. 150959, August 4, 2006, 497 SCRA 638;

6. Heirs of Lonoy v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R. No. 175049, November 27, 2008, 572 SCRA 185;

7. Philippine Bank of Commerce v. Macadaeg, 109 Phil. 981 [1960];

8. Buenaventura v. Uy, G.R. No. 28156, March 31, 1987, 149 SCRA 22;

9. Vicar International v. FEB Leasing, G.R. No. 157195, April 22, 2005, 456 SCRA 588;

10. Uy v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, G.R. No. 43389, April 28, 1980, 97 SCRA 255;

1

Page 2: RemRev1 Cases

11.In-n-Out Burger v. Sehwani, G.R. No. 179127, December 24, 2008, 575 SCRA 535

12. Pajuyo v. CA, G.R. No. 146364, 3 June 2004, 430 SCRA 492, 509;

13. PAL v. FASAP, G.R. No. 143088, January 24, 2006, 497 SCRA 605;

14. Robern Development Corp. v. Quitain, G.R. No. 135042, September 23, 1999, 315 SCRA 150;

15. Vda. de Melencion v. CA, G.R. 148846, September 25, 2007, 534 SCRA 62;

16. Sheker v. Estate of Sheker, G.R. No. 157912, December 13, 2007, 540 SCRA 111;

17. Five-Star Bus Company v. CA, G.R. No. 127064, August 31, 1999, 313 SCRA 367. Please compare with verification signed by counsel

18. Docena v. Lapesura, G.R. No. 140153, March 28, 2001, 355 SCRA 658;

19. Tible & Tible v. Royal Savings and Loan Association, G.R. No. 155806, April 8, 2008, 550 SCRA 562;

20. Pet Plans v. CA, G.R. No. 148287, November 23, 2004, 443 SCRA 510;

21. Loquias v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 139396. August 15, 2000, 338 SCRA 62;

22. Maranaw Hotels v. CA, G.R. No. 149660, January 20, 2009, 576 SCRA 463;

23. BPI Leasing Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 127624, November 18, 2003, 416 SCRA 4.

24. Cagayan Valley Drug Corporation v. CIR, G.R. No. 151413, February 13, 2008, 545 SCRA 10;

25. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company v. WMC Resources International Pty. Ltd., G.R. No. 153885, September 24, 2003, 412 SCRA 101, 109;

26. Novelty Philippines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 146125, September 17, 2003, 411 SCRA 211, 217-220;

27. Pfizer v. Galan, G.R. No. 143389, May 25, 2001, 358 SCRA 240, 246-248;

28. Mactan-Cebu International AA v. CA, G.R. No. 139495, November 27, 2000, 346 SCRA 126;

29. Spouses Diu v. Ibajan, G.R. No. 132657, January 19, 2000, 322 SCRA 452;

2

Page 3: RemRev1 Cases

30. Domingo v. Rayala, G.R. No. 155831, February 18, 2008, 546 SCRA 90;

31. Young v. Spouses Sy, G.R. No. 157745 and 157955, September 26, 2006, 503 SCRA 151, 166;

32. Santos v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 164439, January 23, 2006, 497 SCRA 487;

33. Buan v. Lopez, G.R. No. 75349, October 13, 1985, 145 SCRA 34;

34. Guaranteed Hotels v. Baltao, G.R. No. 164338, January 17, 2005, 448 SCRA 738, 744;

35. Young v. Keng Seng, G.R. No. 143464, March 5, 2003, 398 SCRA 629;

36. Philippine Nails and Wires Corporation v. Malaya Insurance Company, G.R. No. 143933, February 14, 2003, 397 SCRA 431;

37. ECC v. CA, G.R. No. 115858, June 26, 1996, 257 SCRA 717;

38. Coca-Cola v. SSC, G.R. No. 159323, July 31, 2008, 560 SCRA 719;

39. Ao-As v. CA, G.R. No. 128464, June 20, 2006, 491 SCRA 353;

40. Benguet Electric Cooperative v. NLRC, G.R. No. 89070, 209 SCRA 55;

41. Sun Insurance Office v. Asuncion, February 13, 1989, 170 SCRA 274.

42. Manchester Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 75919, May 7, 1987, 149 SCRA 562;

43. Negros Oriental Planters v. Judge of RTC-Negros Occidental, G.R. No. 179878, December 24, 2008, 575 SCRA 575;

44. Ruby Shelter Builders and Realty v. Formaran, G.R. No. 175914, 578 SCRA 575;

45. Tacay v. RTC of Tagum, December 20, 1989, 180 SCRA 483;

46. Bello v. Ubo, G.R. No. 30353, September 30, 1982, 117 SCRA 91;

47. Montalban v. Maximo, G.R. No. 22997, March 15, 1968, 22 SCRA 1070;

48. Filmerco Commercial v. IAC, G.R. No. 70661, April 9, 1987, 149 SCRA 194;

49. Venturanza v. CA, G.R. No. 77760, December 11, 1987, 156 SCRA 305;

50. Cezar v. Ricafort-Bautista, G.R. No. 136415,. October 31, 2006, 506 SCRA 322;

3

Page 4: RemRev1 Cases

51. Biaco v. Philippine Countryside Rural Bank, G.R. No. 161417, 515 SCRA 106;

52. Villarosa & Partner v. Benito, G.R. No. 136426, 312 SCRA 65;

53. Litton Mills, Inc. v. CA, 256 SCRA 696;

54. Signetics Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 225 SCRA 737;

55. Banco Español-Filipino v. Palanca, 37 Phil 921;

56. Perkins v. Dizon, 69 Phil 186;

57. Sahagum v. CA, G.R. No. 78328, 198 SCRA;

58. Jose v. Buyon, G.R. No. 147369, 414 SCRA 216.

59. Obaña v. CA, G.R. No. 87635, 172 SCRA 866;

60. Valmonte v. CA, G.R. No. 108538, 252 SCRA 92;

61. Montalban v. Maximo, G.R. No. 22997, 22 SCRA 1070.

62. Montefalcon v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 165016, 554 SCRA 513;

63. Toyota Cubao, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 126321, 281 SCRA 198; and

64. Baticano v. Chu, G.R. No. 58036, 148 SCRA 541.

4