Upload
rene-bekkers
View
85
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The civic core is the part of the population that is responsible for a disproportionately large partof civic participation. This paper shows how the level of activity and the composition of the civiccore have changed in the Netherlands between 1997 and 2009 using data from the Giving in theNetherlands Survey. The results show that - despite ongoing secularization - the civic core in theNetherlands is increasingly religious. At the same time, the prevalence of higher educatedindividuals in the civic core has diminished. Engagement in charitable giving is increasinglyrelated to engagement in volunteering. In sum, the increasing concentration of activity in thecivic core is especially visible among religious persons and volunteers.
Citation preview
Religion and the Civic Core
in the Netherlands René Bekkers
Center for Philanthropic Studies
VU University Amsterdam
December 8, 2011 1UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital
• Religious people do more of the total giving and volunteering in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands and Flanders.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital2
Religion in the Netherlands
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital3
Giving in the Netherlands
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital4
• Civic participation tends to be concentrated among a small group that does most of the giving and volunteering.
• Reed & Selbee (2001, NVSQ) call this group the ‘civic core’.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital5
• You can think of giving and volunteering as a natural phenomenon with a certain level of concentration.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital6
Like firebugs.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital7
• Firebugs tend to cling together.• In my own front garden I find them
especially on dry and sunny places.• Churches are like the sunny rocks in
my garden – a fertile environment for donors and volunteers.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital8
This is not what the bugs do.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital9
They concentrate -
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital10
Into a core.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital11
So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in religion that makes people care about society as a whole?
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital12
Popular dichotomies
• Conviction and community (Wuthnow, 1991)
• Intrinsic religious motivation (Cnaan et al., 1993) vs. associational ties (Jackson et al, 1995)
• Norms and networks (Ruiter & De Graaf, 2006)
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital13
Volunteering and Giving
• Volunteering and charitable giving are two types of contributions to society
• They are both indicators of social capital, governed by similar principles
• With Pamala Wiepking I recently summarized the literature on charitable giving in a review article for Voluntary Sector Review (November 2011 issue).
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital14
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital15
• In this formulation, religion is viewed as an external force that influences people.
• From religious communities, people ‘get’ their networks and convictions.
• Religious beliefs and prosocial values may vary from person to person.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital16
So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in religion that makes people care about society as a whole?
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital17
So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in people that makes them care about religion and society as a whole?
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital18
A stone in the pond…
• Going back to the firebugs, I wonder why bugs like sunny rocks.
• Why do donors and volunteers love going to church?
• Church attendance involves exposure to requests for contributions.
• For those who dislike contributing and/or being asked to do so, the church is not a fun place to be.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital19
Endogeneity
• Religion is increasingly a matter of choice.
• People with personalities and value systems that conflict with the church in which they were ‘born’ will leave.
• Social influence in religious communities is also to some extent the influence group members allow.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital20
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital21
-
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital22
Back on track: so what?
• This talk is mainly about how the concentration of giving and volunteering among religious groups in the Netherlands has changed over time.
• This is important because religion disappears from Dutch society.
• Will giving and volunteering decline along with secularization?
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital23
Not…
• …if those who are ‘left behind’ in churches become more active citizens. this would lead to a higher level of concentration of giving and volunteering among the religious.
• …if another factor gains importance, such as education – but I am saving that for another occasion.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital24
The data
• All the ‘Giving in the Netherlands’ survey data that we have gathered biennially since 1997. Total n=9,696.
• The data are treated as separate cross-sections and then pooled into one file.
• Amounts are adjusted for inflation.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital25
Total giving by religion
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital26
Religious giving
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital27
Secular giving by religion
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital28
Top quintile, 2009
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital29
Doing their share?
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital30
Growing inequality in secular giving over time
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital31
Volunteer hours top quintile
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital32
Increasing concentration
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital33
Proportion of volunteers by total giving quintile
Amounts donated by non-volunteers
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital34
Amounts donated by volunteers
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital35
Household giving: no-yes
Catholic 1.403*** 1.438***
Protestant 1.757*** 1.751***
Survey wave 1.116***
Catholic * wave 1.038***
Protestant * wave 0.985
Secondary education 1.166*** 1.191***
Tertiary education 1.618*** 1.673***
Secondary * wave 0.915***
Tertiary * wave 0.916***
Church attendance (4 categories) 1.180*** 1.182***
Attendance * wave 0.997
n 9,696 9,696
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital36
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
Amount donated in €
Catholic -109*** -111***
Protestant 216*** 215***
Survey wave 14***
Catholic * wave 7***
Protestant * wave 3
Secondary education 51*** 71***
Tertiary education 160*** 185***
Secondary * wave -17***
Tertiary * wave -21***
Church attendance (4 categories) 125*** 124***
Attendance * wave 2***
n 7,857 7,857
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital37
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
Volunteering: no-yes
Catholic 1.142** 1.146**
Protestant 1.723*** 1.709***
Survey wave 1.045***
Catholic * wave 0.999
Protestant * wave 1.025
Secondary education 1.190*** 1.245***
Tertiary education 1.613*** 1.695***
Secondary * wave 0.958***
Tertiary * wave 0.963***
Church attendance (4 categories) 1.333*** 1.326***
Attendance * wave 1.017***
n 9,030 9,030
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital38
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
Amount donated in € (logs, donors only)
Catholic -.063 -.097 -.098
Protestant .841*** .744*** .688***
Survey wave .111*** .106*** .085***
Secondary education .707*** .585*** .554***
Tertiary education 1.393*** 1.278*** 1.237***
Volunteering .389*** .235*** .159
Volunteering * wave .067*** .059*** .046***
Social responsibility .384*** .357***
Altruistic values .628*** .582***
Asked to volunteer .108* .058
Number of solicitations .214*** .161***
Requests * wave .015*
n 5,983 5,983 5,983
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital39
Odds ratios in OLS regressions of log of total amount donated, also including age , age * wave, education * wave, religion * wave
Secular amount donated in € (logs, donors only)
Catholic -.063 -.259*** -.296***
Protestant .283*** .098 -.064
Survey wave -.026*** .114*** .085***
Secondary education -.025 .585*** .522***
Tertiary education .554*** 1.278*** 1.304***
Volunteering .375*** .132
Volunteering * wave .054** .031
Social responsibility .357***
Altruistic values .643***
Asked to volunteer .057
Number of solicitations .165***
Requests * wave .018**
n 5,983 5,983 5,983
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital40
Odds ratios in OLS regressions of log of total amount donated, also including age , age * wave, education * wave, religion * wave
Additional results
• Concentration of giving among the elderly is due to their stronger religiosity.
• No significant changes in relationships with hours volunteered among volunteers.
• No changes in relationships of prosocial values with giving.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital41
Additional results
• Similar denominational differences in helping behavior as in volunteering.
• Helping is positively related to volunteering, both secular and religious.
• The relationship between secular volunteering and church attendance has become stronger over time.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital42
Conclusions
• The civic core is increasingly religious.
• The civic core is becoming less highly educated.
• The civic core becomes increasingly concentrated: volunteering and giving increasingly go together.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital43
Concentrating from
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital44
To this core.
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital45
A grim future?
• How can we create new forms of cohesion in society that bring people together?
• Creating opportunities to contribute time and money in groups with positive norms: sunny rocks
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital46
December 8, 2011UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital47
Something else
-
Contact
• ‘Giving in the Netherlands’, Center for Philanthropic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam: www.geveninnederland.nl
• René Bekkers, [email protected]• Blog: renebekkers.wordpress.com• Twitter: @renebekkers
December 8, 2011 48UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and
Social Capital