Regional Workshop on Impact-based forecasts in RAII (ASIA)

Seoul, Republic of Korea

7-9 November, 2017

FINAL REPORT

2

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Regional Workshop on Impact-based forecasts (IBF) in RAII (ASIA), first of its kind, was hosted by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the Korean Meteorological Administration (KMA) on 7-9 November, 2017 at the Seoul Garden Hotel, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 1.2 Mr. Jaecheol NAM, KMA Administrator, Mr. Chung Kyu PARK, WMO RAP Director, Ms. Miriam Andrioli, WMO WDS/SDD Chief and Dr. Abdullah Ahmed Al Mandoos, President of WMO RAII participated in the opening with welcome speeches addressed to the local authorities and representatives of the participating countries to the workshop. Mr. Park also delivered a presentation on the WMO’s strategic priority for enhancing the socio-economic benefits and visibility of NMHSs. His presentation included a description of the future WMO GMAS. In in addition to her speech, Ms. Andrioli delivered a presentation emphasizing the importance of the NMHSs Service Delivery with a description of its Strategy and Implementation Plan. She highlighted the relevance of the IBFs and warnings as a paramount component of such services and focused on its development and provision worldwide, she also introduced the contents of the WMO Guidelines on Multi-hazard Impact-based Forecast and Warning Services publication (No.1150) to the audience. In addition she pointed out the WMO’s role in supporting WMO Members to keep abreast of the new developments and innovations. Finally, she described the expected objectives of the workshop as recommended by the Implementation-Coordination Team on Public Weather Service Delivery (CBS-OPAG ICT-PWSD) meeting held the previous week in Beijing, China, explaining that its outcomes will be considered by both the CBS-OPAG/PWSD Task Teams and the WMO SDD as drivers for their future work. 1.3 A side meeting was organized on 7 November, between, Mr. Jaecheol NAM, KMA Mr. Chung Kyu PARK, WMO RAP Director, Dr. Abdullah Ahmed Al Mandoos, President of WMO RAII and Ms. Miriam Andrioli, WMO WDS/SDD Chief. During the meeting Mr. NAM expressed his commitment on behalf of KMA to further support the implementation of the regional IBF and Warning services project which was submitted by KMA and further decided by the 16th session of RAII, and to facilitate an active involvement of members in the region in the further implementation of the project. 1.4 The workshop was attended by representatives of 19 WMO Member Countries (17 from RA II and 2 from RA I) as well as by representatives of local Universities. 1.5 Laos, Viet Nam and Thailand attendance was funded by the Climate Risk and Early Warning Systems (CREWS) Project. The list of participants is contained in Appendix I to this report. 2. ORGANIZATION OF THE WORKSHOP 2.1 Working arrangements and full detailed information of the Sessions are described in the workshop programme, Appendix II to this report. 2.2 The Workshop included a Poster session with presentations from the KMA on the topic User-oriented Impact Forecasting Services in Korea. Deltares Research Institute (Netherland) represented by Mr. Albrecht Weerts (WMO sponsored expert to the workshop) also contributed to the session with two posters on new developments in the IBF field. 3. REVIEW OF THE CURRENT STATE, OUTCOMES, THE WAY FORWAD

3

3.1 Current state and challenges by country Members’ representatives provided a complete overview on the current state of the alerting systems in their respective countries followed by a Questions-Answers segment. India: The India Meteorological Department (IMD) representative described the Natural hazards of significant impact in the country and the different national organizations that provide the related warnings. Regarding IMD forecasts and warnings, it was explained that warning criterion is defined for each parameter, which SOPs are in place as well as linkages with Media and Disaster authorities and that time of issue for warnings is scheduled. Improved Early warning system is in place with increased resolution of global NWP models. IMD provides dedicated and general forecasts and warnings (City specific, pilgrimage, power & health sectors, monsoons, heavy rain, thunderstorm, cyclone, fog, heat and cold wave, etc.). IMD has a thorough dissemination system for forecasts and warnings. IMD acts as Regional specialized Meteorological Centre for WMO/ESCAP Panel on Tropical Cyclones RSMC–NEW DELHI. The SWFDP Main Goals in India were explained as well as the threshold values used in RSMC daily severe weather forecasting guidance. IMD provides Coastal inundation FDP (CIFDP) to Bangladesh. IMD, New Delhi is the SAsia FFGS Regional Centre. Under SAARC STORM (Severe Thunderstorm Observation and Modeling). Under BIMSTEC, India provides capacity building support to Bay of Bengal countries. No mention was made regarding the provision of IBF and Warnings. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD) representative stated that about 68% of the country is vulnerable to flood and that it is the most disaster prone area in the world. A full description of the forecasts and warnings issued by BMD was made. ICT (Information, Communication, Technology) is used in every stage of the processes. Alerts are transmitted to the national disaster management agency which is the alerting authority in the country. It was highlighted the need of TV studios as mean of direct dissemination of forecasts and warnings to the general public. No IBF system is in place Maldives: Maldives Meteorological Service’s (MMS) representative explained the country is composed by 1200 islands, only 1 meter above sea level, therefore highly vulnerable to climate change and level rise. A SOP is in place for the delivery of warnings and Radio, TV and SMS are used for their dissemination to the general public. The need of Doppler radars, buoys and the enhancement of ocean state forecasts for better Marine Meteorology services was raised by the MMS representative. No IBF system is in place Sri Lanka: the Department of Meteorology’s (DM) representative explained that the Disaster Management Centre (DMC) was established as the implementing arm of the National Council for Disaster Management (NCDM) in July 2005 and that it is the apex body for disaster management. An Early Warning Dissemination System is in place. Color code Warning criteria is used for cyclones, heavy rainfall, and strong winds. Thresholds for warnings pose a great challenge for DMC. The National Tsunami Warning Center is located at the DM but in case of Tsunamis, “it takes several minutes (some time up to 1hrs) to receive sea level information as DM doesn’t own tide gauge stations”. A color code is assigned to represent tsunami alert status. The warning dissemination system needs improvement. Due to the low quality of the NWP model outputs, precipitation forecasts show repeatedly great failures particularly on QPE (Quantitative Precipitation Estimation), traditional media takes advantage of this situation, damaging DM credibility a fact that translates into lost of credibility among the general public. The DM representative explained that in cases of warnings for heavy rain, people are reluctant to evacuate due to the above mentioned facts. No IBF system is in place Buthan: the National Centre for Hydrology & Meteorology’s representative explained that Impact-based weather forecast is necessary for Bhutan. Needs were also identified

4

in the areas of medium range weather forecast and sub-seasonal forecast as well as collaborative research with international, regional and national institutes along with Institutional capacity development. No IBF system is in place Kazakhstan: the Kazakh National Hydrometeorological Center is the responsible for the issuing of warnings at national level, its users are the Public authorities, Power industry, Agriculture, Oil and gas complex, Sailing charter, Air and road transport, Water supply and construction, Ecology and tourism, Population, Mass media, etc. No IBF system is in place. Turkmenistan: the National Committee of Hydrometeorology utilizes the software "COSMO" to process information. The Caspian Sea and rivers within the territory are among the main areas for issuing forecasts and warnings. No IBF system is in place. Kyrgyz Republic: the Agency on Hydrometeorology’s representative explained that 94.2 % of the territory is higher than 1000 meters asl and that 40.8 % is higher than 3000 meters asl. The hazardous weather events are, in autumn and winter: earliest frost, gale, snow storm, avalanche, extremely low temperature and fog and in spring and summer, heavy precipitation, flash flood, mud flood, squall wind, hail and thunderstorms. Around 42% of the territory of Kyrgyzstan is at risk of avalanches. The Early warning system of the Kyrgyzhydromet includes a Division on the Avalanche Safety. Weather forecast and storm warnings are issued by using an approach based on the synoptic and hydrodynamic methods. The system for the visualization GISMeteo, Ensemble Prediction Systems from Japan Meteorological Agency, Forecast Products from ECMWF, Mesoscale model WRF-ARW (World Bank project), ECMWF-WFDP-СА, COSMO-RU; ”METEOALERT” (replicated at national level) are in use. Storm warnings on hazardous meteorological phenomena are issued. Almost all territory is prone to mudflow, flash flood and flood therefore hydrological warnings are issued as well. CARFFG flood flash guidance is used. The Center of Crisis Management for the distribution of hydrometeorological warnings to the government, ministries, media and users (Ministry of Emergence Situations, Water Management, Agriculture, Mass media, Government, transport, construction, insurance, Energy Sector) is in place. Means of dissemination are e-mail, phone, fax, SMS and the official website www.meteo.kg. The Representative expressed that Kyrgyzhydromet could initiate an IBF System on precipitation. Challenges: Lack of qualified specialists on forecasting (NWP and IT support).Development of the meteorological observation network, meteorological radars (there are no Met Radars in the country) and radio sounding. Lack of modeling on the prediction of floods. Absence of scientific research activity for developing new methods for the forecast of hazardous phenomena and the lack of modelling for the prediction of avalanches. Mongolia: MMS’ representative described the various weather hazards affecting the country with particular emphasis on the Dzud phenomenon, a winter disaster in which deep snow, severe cold, or other conditions that render forage unavailable or inaccessible lead to high livestock mortality. A Dzud impact risk map based product has been developed and in use to inform a wide range of users (from the Mongolian Government Meeting, Special committee meeting on Emergency Management, Parliament Standing Committee meeting on Food and Agriculture, UNDP meeting in Mongolia, Ministry Road and Transition to Herders). The dissemination system includes a wide range of communication media. No verification process is in place though. A color code is in use also for the classification of extreme weather, it includes thresholds. The warning information system is composed by a set of: Advisory(for Potentially dangerous weather), Warning information (for dangerous weather) and Alert information(for very dangerous weather). The MeteoAlert system was replicated within the country. Challenge: the country has only one meteorological radar, need to enhance NWP before moving to an IBF system.

5

Thailand: Thai Meteorological Department (TMD). The most important hazards affecting the country are flood and drought. Improvements have been made in the Alert system during the last years. Advisories and warnings are issued for Heavy Rain, Tropical Cyclone, High Sea Waves. Regarding the level of warning TMD’s Metalarm website (http://www.metalarm.tmd.go.th/) provides the general public with a graphical information system on potential danger and awareness over Thailand domain. The awareness system consists of geographical maps and a standard set of awareness situations (heavy rain, hot, Cold, strong wind and Sea wave, TC, earthquake, tsunami, etc.). A color coding, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and a Warning Dissemination System (includes the Department of Disaster prevention and mitigation, DDPM) as well as a complete system for warning service delivery (including mobile App) up to the level of Community leader, are in place. Vietnam: The National Hydro-Meteorological Service of Vietnam’s (NHMS) representative described the weather and hydrological models and observation network in use. It was emphasized the Typhoon forecast analysis using DOPPLER weather radar. Challenges: need of more weather radars, combination radar - model, upper air data. Upgrade the old weather radar stations network. Investment in automatic salt measuring stations. Myanmar: The Deputy Director of the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology (DMH) described the hazard profile of the country and the current Meteorological Warning System and disseminating processes. A color coding to depict the risk of the storms is in use. The DMH issues warnings for disasters/phenomena associated with TCs and its cascading effects such as landslides, flash floods, heavy rain, strong winds and storm surge. Cooperation with other NMHSs and Institutions was highlighted. A full description of needs and requirements was introduced including the creation of a Service Delivery Platform for weather services. Laos: The representative of DHM described the hazards taking place in the country which include Typhoon warning, Heavy rainfall warning, Flood Warning, Flash flood warning, etc. Radio broadcasts are the most powerful means of dissemination for public awareness on weather, flood forecast and warnings. Television has less coverage for TV networks do not cover all the territory yet . Also in remote areas the local authority plays an important role in disseminating warnings. Internet services are available in most urban areas though. Challenges: In Lao PDR, almost big cities are located in flat plains along the Mekong River and its tributaries, which comprise 50 % of the total population, need to focus more attention on Warning on inundation through the heavy rainfall flood forecasting, warning and Telecommunication Systems. Increase the frequency of issuing of forecasts and warnings through mass media to public and concerned end users. Enhancement of awareness and preparedness of residents and need of a plan to timely response before flood. Improvement of Forecast verification is required. Korea: Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) is in the first stages of an IBF implementation, therefore, a full description on the topic “Current Status and Future Plan of the implementation of Impact-based Forecasting” was introduced by Mr. Seungbum KIM, Team Manager-Weather Impact Forecasts Team, Forecast Bureau, KMA. Among the challenges it was mentioned the need of more accurate ensemble outputs and suitable thresholds. Building partnership with stakeholders and collaboration with social scientists and staffs involved in the partnership. Hazard Impact Modelling. Collection of impact DB, including studies to enhance the usability of new technologies such as IoT (CCTV, Drone, etc.), Big Data, AI. Collaboration between academia and government at National, Regional and Global level.

6

Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong Observatory introduced the subject “Use of big data, crowdsourcing and GIS in assessment of weather-related impact”. 3.2 Notes: The workshop was informed that Cambodia, Lao, Viet Nam and Thailand have implemented the Flash Flooding Guidance System through funding by the USAID office assistance of OFDA (US Foreign Disaster Assistance). Qatar, Nigeria and Niger did not deliver presentations during the Workshop. 3.3 Experts’ presentations 3.3.1 Mr. Weerts (Deltares research institute), delivered a presentation on “IBF, experiences from around the world” focused on the research and work developed by Deltares in deltas, coastal regions and riverine regions. 3.3.2 Experts of the UK Met Office, Mark Bevan and Rebecca Hemingway, delivered presentations on “The Met Office experience” and “Experiences from the Natural Hazard Partnership and the Hazard Impact Modelling project”, respectively. 3.3.3 New advances in digital technology were introduced by the Korea Univ. through the presentation of “CCTV based video analytics for managing and forecasting impact weather”. Based on the Davos Forum, the speech focused on the premise “Machines think like humans”. The University representative explained the system developed for fog, rain and snow detection and alarm through the use of CCTV cameras. It was explained that the system improves IBF by the collection of information, surveillance (e.g. river’s water depth and water accumulation/depth in the streets of urban areas), the impact of weather (by analyzing human behavior), and classification and recognition of weather phenomena. It was admitted though that interoperability of (all) sensors of different manufacturers is still a challenge. All Power Point presentations in the following link: https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/amp/pwsp/RAII-WS-IBF-Seoul.htm 3.4 Outcomes As recommend by the Implementation-Coordination Team on Public Weather Service Delivery (CBS-OPAG ICT-PWSD) meeting (3-4 Nov 2017, Beijing, China) the Workshop produced the following important outcomes and recommendations: (break up group session moderated by Rebecca Hemingway)

1. -Need to improve observing networks (Doppler radars, buoys, etc.), and -Need to improve NWP models for better forecasting (lack of confidence on NWP models has been highlighted by many Member representatives) as first step before IBF implementation.

2. -Need of Hazard Impact Modelling (the audience expressed that empiric methods

to develop IBF matrix might not be solid enough) -Need of Pilot projects on IBF

3. -Enhance cooperation with Governmental agencies and Disaster Management

Authorities.

7

-Improvement of SOPs

4. -Training for NMHSs forecasters on IBF (behavior change towards IBF is required at NMHSs level) -Training sessions involving Government and Disaster Management Agencies. -General public education on IBF.

5. -Collaboration, mentoring, twinning, and best practices among NMHSs (e.g. of

good collaboration practice between KMA-UK Met Office was highlighted) -Improve collaboration among neighbor countries for transboundary issues (e.g. in coastal regions)

6. -Improve means of communication/dissemination of forecasts and warnings

7. -Research has to understand forecasting needs in order to provide better tools. -Verification processes need to be implemented.

8. -Improve assistance to NMHSs on technical issues

3.5 The way forward Dr. Park provided a final talk on relevant topics such as capacity development and the increase of the communication skills of forecasters. He mentioned that budget and staff constrains is faced at present by many NMHSs. Other topics of his talk were the present gap among Member countries and the possible ways to bridge it, the language barrier, the reliability of forecasts and warnings and the private-public partnerships vision. He encouraged workshops on IBF at country and Regional level, the latter with the assistance of RTCs. In addition, he encouraged the audience to join the IBF and Warning system and WMO GMAS. 4. CLOSURE OF THE WORKSHOP With closing remarks by the KMA authorities, WMO RAP Director and the WMO WDS/SDD Chief, the Regional Workshop on Impact-based forecasts in RA II (ASIA), closed at 12:00 hours on Thursday, 9 November 2017.

8

Appendix I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Participant Country Organization Email address

1 Abdullah Al Mandoos (President, WMO RA II)

United Arab Emirates

National Center of Meteorology

Amandoos@ncms.ae

2 Chung Kyu PARK (Director, WMO RAP)

Switzerland WMO cpark@wmo.int

3 Miriam Silvina ANDRIOLI (Chief, WMO SDD)

Switzerland WMO mandrioli@wmo.int

4 Albrecht Henricus WEERTS (WMO Inivited Expert)

Netherlands Deltares albrecht.weerts@deltares.nl

5 Md.Sanaul Hoque MONDAL

Bangladesh Bangladesh Meteorological Department

hoque_mondal@yahoo.com

6 Karma TENZIN Bhutan National Center for Hydrology and Meteorology

karmatenzin@nchm.gov.bt

7 Chi Kin PAN Hong Kong, China

Hong Kong Observatory

ckpan@hko.hovhk

8 Somenath DUTTA India India Meteorological Department

som.dutta@imd.gov.in

9 Ardak KALMENOVA Kazakhstan RSE Kazhydromet sinopast@gmail.com

10 Makhbuba Rajabovna KASYMOVA

Kyrgyz Republic

Agency on Hydrometeorology under Ministry of Emergency Situations

synop_omp@meteo.kg

11 Sinthaly CHANTHANA Lao PDR Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment

dmhvte@etl.com

12 Hussain WAHEED Maldives Maldives Meteorological Service

husynwahyd@hotmail.com

13 Oyunjargal LAMJAV Mongolia National Agency for Meteorology and Environment Monitoring

oyunjargal@namem.gov.mn, o_jargal@hotmail.com

14 Hla TUN Myanmar Department of Meteorology and Hydrology

hlatunmr@gmail.com

15 Haya Fadul KF AKNAIMI Qatar Qatar meteorology department

Haya.Al-naimi@caa.gov.qa

16 Jeewan WICKRAMANAYAKA KARUNARATNA

Sri Lanka Department of Meteorology

jeewankaru1@yahoo.com

17 Surapong SARAPA Thailand Thai Meteorological Department

surapong@tmd.go.th

18

Hojanyyaz JUMASHOV

Turkmenistan

National committee of Hydrometeorology under the Cabinet of Ministers of Turkmenistan

jumashovhojanyyaz@mail.ru

19

Rebecca Samantha HEMINGWAY (KMA invited Expert)

UK

Met Office

rebecca.hemingway@metoffic e.gov.uk

9

20 Mark Allan BEVAN (KMA invited Expert)

UK Met Office mark.bevan@metoffice.gov.uk

21 Mohamed Al EBRI United Arab Emirates

National Center of Meteorology

22 Omar AlYazidi United Arab Emirates

National Center of Meteorology

23 Abdulla Al Hammadi United Arab Emirates

National Center of Meteorology

aalhammadi@ncms.ae

24

Dinh Quyet LE

Viet Nam

Southern Regional Hydro-Meteorological Center, National Hydro-Meteorological Service of Viet Nam

quyet.le74@gmail.com

25 Mohammed Sambo Nigeria Nigerian Meteorological Agency

sambo65zxr@yahoo.com

26 Lonihala Quattara Niger EAMAC (African School of Meteorology and Civil Aviation)

loniouattara@gmail.com

27 Jae-cheol NAM (Administrator, KMA)

South Korea KMA jcnam5905@korea.kr

28

Hee-dong YOO (Director-General, KMA Forecast Bureau)

South Korea

KMA

hyoo@kma.go.kr

29

Jun-mo JEON (Director-General, Metropolitan Meteorological Administration)

South Korea

KMA

joonmo@kma.go.kr

30 Hyun-sik JANG South Korea KMA hsjang@kma.go.kr 31 Kwan-young CHUNG South Korea KMA kychung83@korea.kr 32 Kum-lan KIM South Korea KMA kkl@kma.go.kr 33 Deok-bin YIM South Korea KMA echobin@korea.kr 34 Hyun-sook JUNG South Korea KMA hsjung@kma.go.kr 35 Jae-gwang WON South Korea KMA ecotus37@korea.kr 36 Sung-hyup YOU South Korea KMA shyou@kma.go.kr 37 Youn-deok HAN South Korea KMA handeok@kma.go.kr 38 Yong-seob LEE South Korea KMA yslee0@korea.kr 39 Miloslav Belorid South Korea KMA/NIMS mbelorid@korea.kr 40 Chul-hwan SO South Korea Ministry of the

Interior and Safety chulwhanso@korea.kr

41 Min-su JOH South Korea KISTI msjoh@kisti.re.kr 42 Sa-kwang SONG South Korea KISTI esmallj@kisti.re.kr 43 Ji-sun KANG South Korea KEI jskang@kisti.re.kr 44 Yeo-ra CHAE South Korea KEI yrchae@kei.re.kr 45 Doo-sun PARK South Korea KEI dspark@kei.re.kr 46 Han-seok KO South Korea Korea University hsko@korea.ac.kr 47 Jai-ho OH South Korea Pukyong University jjho2023@gmail.com 48 Jin-kyu HONG South Korea Yonsei University jhong@yonsei.ac.kr 49 Se-hyun KIM South Korea Yonsei University kshyunn@yonsei.ac.kr 50 Jong-gil PARK South Korea Inje University envpjk@inje.ac.kr 51 Eun-byeol KIM South Korea Inje University star2713@nate.com 52 Kwang-hyung KIM South Korea APEC Climate Center sospicy77@gmail.com 53 Jin-young RHEE South Korea APEC Climate Center jyrhee@apcc21.org 54 Sue-kyoung LEE South Korea APEC Climate Center suekyoung.lee@apcc21.org 55 Jae-cheol JO South Korea APEC Climate Center 56 Yong-joon KIM South Korea GLOCAL M&S Co. Ltd vision4g@gmail.com 57 Young-hee KIM South Korea International

Cooperation

58 Chun-woo LEE South Korea Weatherpia 2005u@naver.com

10

59 Su-seong KIM South Korea Weatherpia 60 Byeong-ju LEE South Korea WISE bjlee0704@gmail.com 61 Yi-le SIN South Korea WISE 62 Chae-un LEE South Korea WISE 63 Si-woo YANG South Korea KMITI 64 Geun-yong SONG South Korea KMITI 65 Jong-yun KIM South Korea KMITI kimjy@kmiti.or.kr 66 Han-na YOU South Korea KMITI 67 Se-ju CHOI South Korea KMITI 68 Seong-cheol SHIN South Korea Ecobrain scshin@ecobrain.net 69 So-young BANG South Korea KMA sybang@korea.kr 70 Youn-mai KIM South Korea KMA mai@korea.kr 71 Seung-kyun PARK South Korea KMA pskk@korea.kr 72 Ji-won KIM South Korea KMA hakim1114@korea.kr 73 Kun-young BYUN South Korea KMA buildg@korea.kr 74 Seong-hoon CHEONG South Korea KMA shjung@kma.go.kr 75 Na-young YIM South Korea KMA nyyim@korea.kr 76 Jae-hoon JANG South Korea KMA airgreen7@korea.kr 77 Kyu-rang KIM South Korea KMA/NIMS krk9@kma.go.kr 78 Byoung-choel CHOI South Korea KMA/NIMS cbc123@korea.kr 79 Hyun-uk KIM South Korea KMA/NIMS darzhyun@korea.kr 80 Jong-hyoek JEONG South Korea KMA/NIMS libero20@korea.kr 81 Hye-mi KANG South Korea KMA 82 Hyo-jeong BAE South Korea KMA bhj7749@korea.kr 83 Eun-sun LEE South Korea KMA 84 Tae-hee KIM South Korea KMA niki0309@korea.kr 85 Mi-yeong JO South Korea KMA 5803277jy@korea.kr 86 Eun-se JANG South Korea KMA newhope@korea.kr 87 Jin-ah KIM South Korea KMA skja1204@korea.kr 88 Mi-na LEE South Korea KMA minadoc@korea.kr 89 Jin-seok JUNG South Korea KMA 90 Hwa-jin KIM South Korea KMA genius84@korea.kr 91 Seok-min HONG South Korea KMA sml.smhong@gmail.com 92 Sang-ho LEE South Korea KMA lsh77@korea.kr 93 Ryeong-ah KIM South Korea KMA ryunga@korea.kr 94 Su-min GO South Korea KMA suminnie@korea.kr 95 Jae-hwan LIM South Korea KMA ljhmmm@kma.go.kr 96 Eun-ju PARK South Korea KMA ejpark@kma.go.kr 97 Jeong-ho KUK South Korea KMA skylover0007@korea.kr 98 Ji-hui KIM South Korea KMA gibbeum85@korea.kr 99 Su-bin LEE South Korea KMA anjil21@naver.com 100 Jeong-soo KIM South Korea KMA idpure9@korea.kr 101 Byeong-woo JEONG South Korea KMA jbwzzang0024@korea.kr 102 Gyoung-lock KIM South Korea KMA krkim@kma.go.kr 103 Gyung-a GANG South Korea KMA kangka@kma.go.kr 104 Min-ja LEE South Korea KMA manja78@korea.kr 105 Seungbum KIM

(Coordinator) South Korea KMA kmaskim@korea.kr

106 Gi-man HONG South Korea KMA gmhong@korea.kr 107 Eun-joo LEE South Korea KMA ejlee01@korea.kr 108 Min-jeong YOUN

(Coordinator) South Korea KMA ymj@korea.kr

109 Kyung-jun LEE South Korea KMA leekj15@korea.kr 110 Chang-min PARK South Korea KMA lucid61@korea.kr 111 Ji-wan PARK South Korea KMA jw1710@korea.kr 112 Jae-in JUNG South Korea KMA jungji@korea.kr

11

Appendix II

PROGRAMME

12

13

___________________