Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
10/10/2014
1
REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OFOIL, GAS & BIOFUELS SECTOR COMPANIES
IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN
Offshore Data Acquisition
System with Platform
Independent Monitoring
Reveals New Geological
View of Brazilian Giant FieldSpeaker: Cayo Nametala de Souza, Petrobras.
Authors: Cayo Nametala de Souza, Patricia Braga Gusmão, Ricardo
Huntemann Deucher, Yuri Sa Scaramussa, Petrobras.
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs”
October 6-7, 2014 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contents
� Use of Permanent Downhole Gauges in Offshore Giant Oil Fields in
Campos Basin.
� SASMIc Technology
� Field Cases
o Fault Transmissibility
o Hydraulic connection between reservoirs
� Conclusions and Recommendations
2
10/10/2014
2
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Permanent Downhole Gauges in Campos Basin
� Permanent Downhole Gauges provide a continuous, real-time source
of downhole pressure and temperature.
� Downhole data is widely used in reservoir management:
3
Production Well DHP
Water
Injection
Well Flow
Rate
4200 psi
scale
Evidence
of pressure
support.
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Permanent Downhole Gauges in Campos Basin
� Permanent Downhole Gauges provide a continuous, real-time source
of downhole pressure and temperature.
� Downhole data is widely used in reservoir management:
4
Production
Well DHP
Water
Injection
Well DHP
Shutdown of other production
well of same reservoir
5700 psi
scale
Pressure gain on
reservoir due to
well shutdown
10/10/2014
3
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Permanent Downhole Gauges in Campos Basin
� Although it’s sensors have incredible resolution, most of PDG usage is
during flow, when slight variations are undetectable.
� Shutting down wells for retrieving information is costly, and is not a
common practice.
� It is necessary to take advantage in any opportunity of data retrieval
from closed wells, in which the information is static, and slight
variations on the reservoir can be perceived.
� This information is even more valuable before the well’s first flow,
since there are no build-up effects on the analyzed data.
5
3 psi scale
Tide effects lower
than 1 psi detectable
on downhole pressure
Downhole Pressure in static condition
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contents
� Use of Permanent Downhole Gauges in Offshore Giant Oil Fields in
Campos Basin.
� SASMIc Technology
� Field Cases
o Fault Transmissibility
o Hydraulic connection between reservoirs
� Conclusions and Recommendations
6
10/10/2014
4
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
SASMIc Technology
� The SASMIc acronym stands for Signal Acquisition System with Independent Monitoring (in Portuguese) and consists of a compact device that can be managed by a Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle (ROV) and inserted on the Subsea Christmas Tree for data retrieval.
� The well must be equipped with sensors (downhole or sea-bed) which provide the data, but does not have to be connected to the platform through umbilical. The SASMIc equipment provides power to energize the sensors and also stores the data in local hard disk, that can later be recovered and sent to the interested party.
7
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contents
� Use of Permanent Downhole Gauges in Offshore Giant Oil Fields in
Campos Basin.
� SASMIc Technology
� Field Cases
o Fault Transmissibility
o Hydraulic connection between reservoirs
� Conclusions and Recommendations
8
10/10/2014
5
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 1 – Fault Transmissibility
� A fault crosses Reservoir A from north to south dividing it in two separate compartments.
� Although the fault has a large throw, which gave the initial idea to be a sealing fault, it was not possible to conclude in advance if both compartments were indeed hydraulically disconnected.
� The wells were drilled considering that both scenarios, Sealing Fault or Transmissible Fault, were possible.
9
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 1 – Fault Transmissibility
� The drilling and production schedule of Reservoir A had Well A-P1 finishing its completion several months before beginning its production.
� Meanwhile, wells A-P2, A-P3 (Producers) and A-I1 (Water Injector) would begin operations on the other side of the fault, and it was suspected that some variation could be detected on downhole sensors of A-P1
� Knowing this beforehand, the reservoir team requested the use of SASMIc technology on Well A-P1.
10
A-P1
A-P2
A-P3
A-I1
10/10/2014
6
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 1 – Fault Transmissibility
� The obtained results on well A-P1 were remarkable, as it showed that
the fault was in fact transmissible.
11
Tide Effects
Production begins
on well A-P3
Production begins
on well A-P2
Water Injection
begins on well A-I1
14 psi
scale
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 1 – Conclusions
� Using the SASMIc technology, the reservoir team verified that the fault was in fact transmissible and the production and injection wells on both sides of the fault were connected.
� Since the data variation to capture this phenomena is in the order of 1 psi, the probability of detecting it during flow is very low.
� With this information, the simulation and geologic models were updated, and a well that was initially planed on being for water injection will now be drilled as a production well, for higher Recovery Factor.
12
10/10/2014
7
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contents
� Use of Permanent Downhole Gauges in Offshore Giant Oil Fields in
Campos Basin.
� SASMIc Technology
� Field Cases
o Fault Transmissibility
o Hydraulic connection between reservoirs
� Conclusions and Recommendations
13
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
� Reservoirs B and C, geographically near each other, were thought to be hydraulically isolated due to geological factors, since they are from different ages and have shale deposits between them.
� During a specific period of the field’s life, Reservoir B had all of it’s wells inoperable due to external factors.
� On that period, the field’s reservoir engineering team requested the SASMIctechnology on a static well of Reservoir B, while Reservoir C, beside it, was still active. The results follow:
Field Case 2 – Hydraulic Connections Between Reservoirs
14
B
C
10/10/2014
8
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
� SASMIc used for downhole data on Well B-I1, during 6 months:
Field Case 2 – Hydraulic Connections Between Reservoirs
15
Static (no flow) Downhole
Pressure on B-I1.
140 psi
scale
� Many other wells were analyzed during this period and the correlations were found with two water injection wells of Reservoir C, C-I1 and C-I2. In the next slide, a comparison is presented with this data and the injection flow rates of both wells.
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 2 – Hydraulic Connections Between Reservoirs
Static (no flow) Downhole
Pressure on B-I1.
Flow rate on
Well C-I1.
Flow rate on
Well C-I2.
10/10/2014
9
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Field Case 2 – Conclusions
17
� With no wells flowing on Reservoir B, it is possible to verify the
influence of nearby reservoirs, by monitoring the downhole data of a
static/shutdown well.
� It is noticed a clear influence of the water injection wells C-I1 and C-I2
on the region of well B-I1, even though they are in reservoirs of
different ages. This influence hadn’t been noticed before when both
reservoirs were in active production.
� With this information, the reservoir team will now plan a new
production well on Reservoir B, knowing that it can rely on pressure
support of the injection wells of Reservoir C. With this in mind, the
team can spare an injection well on Reservoir B, reducing costs on the
new project.
86th ARPEL Experts Level Meeting (RANE) “Management of Reservoirs“ – October 6-7 – Buenos Aires, Argentina
Conclusions and Recommendations
18
� With this technology, it is possible to retrieve information from wells
that are equipped with sensors but are not connected with the
platform (prior or post it’s main operation phase).
� Data retrieved on static condition are extremely valuable, since they
can bring new information that can only be measured in small scales.
� While this technology may not be available to all offshore scenarios,
the main objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of
retrieving well data in static conditions, especially prior to its initial
production, when the interference of the flow has not yet disturbed
the data analysis and important conclusions can be made concerning
the reservoir behavior.
10/10/2014
10
19
Thank you for your time.