Upload
angelica-garrison
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development
Regional Livability Footprint Project
San Mateo CountySeptember 29, 2001
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
San Mateo County Co-Sponsors
San Mateo City/County Association of GovernmentsCounty of San Mateo
SAMCEDAMid-Peninsula Housing CoalitionSustainable San Mateo County
Building & Construction Trades Council of San Mateo County, AFL-CIO
East Palo Alto Community & Neighborhood Development Organization
Joint Venture: Silicon Valley NetworkLeague of Women Voters, San Mateo County
San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers AuthoritySan Mateo County Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO
Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management InitiativeVisitation Valley Planning Alliance
Housing Leadership Council
Special thanks to the San Mateo City/County Association of Governments and Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition for
providing food and refreshments.
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY
Regional Agencies
• Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
• Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)
• Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
• Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC)
• Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
SPONSORING AGENCIESSPONSORING AGENCIES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development45 Member OrganizationsSteering Committee consists of organizations representing the
Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development:
Government: Association of Bay Area Governments
SPONSORING AGENCIESSPONSORING AGENCIES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Prosperous Economy: Bay Area Council
Quality Environment: Sierra Club
Social Equity: Urban Habitat Program
• 1 million new jobs
• 1 million more people
• 265,000 daily in-commuters to the region
• 150% increase in aggregate traffic congestion
• Conversion of up to 83,000 acres of currently undeveloped land
• 44% decrease in households able to afford the median priced home from 1995 to 2001
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
BAY AREA TRENDSBAY AREA TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Through 2020
1995 to 2001
Natural Increase
(“Our own children”)
Net Migration(“Other People”)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
REGIONAL POPULATION GROWTHREGIONAL POPULATION GROWTH
50%
50%(approximate figures)
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Expand housing?
• Constrain future job growth?
• Expand infrastructure to handle in-commuters?
Find a smarter way to grow
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTHCHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTH
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PHILOSOPHYPHILOSOPHY
• Broad participation
• Bottom-up
• Build on local efforts
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
LOCAL EFFORTSLOCAL EFFORTS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
LOCAL EFFORTSLOCAL EFFORTS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
LOCAL EFFORTSLOCAL EFFORTS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
AIA Design Charrettes on Transit-Oriented
Development
• Smart growth land use changes supported by local governments.
• A regional incentive package and implementation strategies.
• A set of smart growth land use projections.
GOALSGOALS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
The Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development:
SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLESSMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Prosperous Economy
Quality Environment
Social Equity
• Efficiently accommodate projected growth.
• Provide sufficient affordable housing.
• Revitalize central cities and older suburbs.
• Reduce single occupant vehicle trips.
• Preserve open space and agricultural land.
• Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement.
SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLESSMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Revitalization of existing communities
• Efficient design for edge development
• Development near transit service
• Mixed use
• Efficient density
• Mixed incomes
SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTSSAMPLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PROCESSPROCESS
Public Workshop Round 1September and October 2001
Distillationand Analysis
Public Workshop Round 2March and April 2001
Final Steps
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Smart growth principles
• Land use mapping
exercise
• Regulatory changes and incentives
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONEPUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
HOUSING UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PROXIMITY OF HSG. TO TRANSIT . . . . .PROXIMITY OF JOBS TO TRANSIT . . . . .OPEN SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PEDESTRIAN QUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PLACEPLACE3S: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GISS: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GIS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
WATER CONSUMPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• Three region-wide thematic alternatives
• Analysis of alternatives and existing trends:
DISTILLATION & ANALYSISDISTILLATION & ANALYSIS
– Housing Affordability
– Jobs/Housing Match
– Market Displacement and Social Equity
– Transportation and Air Quality Modeling
– Development FeasibilityCONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Review results of first workshop.
• Address subregional issues.
• Recommend preferred alternative.
• Develop regulatory changes and
incentives.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND TWOPUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND TWO
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• BAASD coordinates a Public Education and
Engagement Campaign
• ABAG Board considers adoption of
Projections forecast
• MTC’s Regional Transportation Plan
• Other regional plans
• Regional regulatory changes and incentives
• Local implementation
FINAL STEPSFINAL STEPS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• General Plans– Revised Regulatory Framework– Additional Incentives– Regional Context
• Housing Allocations
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROCESSESRELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROCESSES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
RELATIONSHIP TO DRAFT COMPACTRELATIONSHIP TO DRAFT COMPACT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Housing Availability and Affordability
• Traffic Mobility and Congestion
• Open Space Preservation
• Livability and Community Vitality
• Social and Economic Equity
OUR REGIONAL GROWTH CHALLENGESOUR REGIONAL GROWTH CHALLENGES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
Bay Area Jobs and Employed Residents by County, 2000
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
Alam
eda
Cont
ra C
osta
Mar
in
Nap
a
San
Fran
cisc
o
San
Mat
eo
Sant
a Cl
ara
Sola
no
Sono
ma
Total Jobs
Total EmployedResidents
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Projected Growth in Jobs and Employed Residents 2000-2020
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Alamed
a
Contra
Cos
taM
arin
Napa
San F
ranc
isco
San M
ateo
Santa
Clar
a
Solano
Sonom
a
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
Jobs
Employed Residents
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Alam
eda
Cont
ra C
osta
Mar
in
Nap
a
San
Fran
cisc
o
San
Mat
eo
Sant
a Cl
ara
Sola
no
Sono
ma
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
The jobs/housing challenge2000-2020
• Projected job growth: 70,000 jobs
• Resulting housing need: 35,000-40,000
units
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
Affordability Gap for Median-Income Households
-
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
East
Bay
(Oak
land
PMSA
)
San
Fran
cisc
o/
San
Mat
eo/M
arin
(San
Fra
ncisco
PMSA
)
Sant
a Cl
ara
Coun
ty
(San
Jose
PMSA
)
Sono
ma
Coun
ty
(San
ta R
osa
PMSA
)So
lano
/Nap
a
(Val
lejo
-Fai
rfiel
d-
Nap
a PM
SA)
Home Price Affordable toMedian 4 Person Household
Median HomeMarket Price
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
INCOME CATEGORIES FOR A FAMILY OF FOURMedian Income - $80,100
VERY LOW INCOME0-$40,050
— Child Care Worker$17,860 —
Medical Assistant$28,130 —
Retail Clerk$20,360
LOW INCOME$40,050-$64,080
— Accountant$48,740
—Elementary School
Teacher$41,28
0
MODERATE INCOME$64,080-$96,120
—Computer Programmer$70,190
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
—Police Patrol Office$49,220
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
Housing need by affordability category:
• Very low income: 20%• Low income: 10%• Moderate income: 26%• Above moderate income: 44%
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION
2000
BAY AREA HOUSING PERMITS
JAN-SEP 2000
SINGLE-FAMILYDETACHED
63%
MULTI-FAMILY
37%
SINGLE PARENTS
WITH CHILDREN
8%
SINGLES
30%
FAMILIES WITH
CHILDREN
26%
FAMILIES WITH
NO CHILDREN
36%
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Tree TopsMulti-Family HousingSan Bruno
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
The Villas at Bair Island MarinaMulti-Family HousingRedwood City
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Colma RidgeSpecial Needs HousingColma
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Rotary Haciendas ISenior HousingSan Mateo
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
In-Law Unit
HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
Vehicle-Hours of Delay150% Increase
2025
339,100
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
VMT Increasing FasterThan Population
2000-2020
VMTIncrease
PopulationIncrease
14%
28%
1998
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
854,600
100,000
300,000
500,000
700,000
900,000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990 2020
Commute Mode SplitRemains Unchanged
(millions of trips/day)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1990 2020
In-Commuters to Bay AreaIncrease
(thousands of persons/year)
Cars
Transit
Walk, bike
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
648
San Benito County/Monterey
SAN MATEO COUNTY DAILY COMMUTERSSAN MATEO COUNTY DAILY COMMUTERS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Alameda County
36,92642,323
Santa Clara County
Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Year
6,4554,779
10,591
05,000
10,00015,00020,000
Urban Center TraditionalNeighborhood
SuburbanNeighborhood
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
(San Francisco) (Rockridge) (San Ramon)
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
BART Extension
Caltrain
Illustrations from Urban Advantage
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Hayward Park Station Area Improvement PlanSan Mateo
BMS Design Group
Illustrations from Urban Advantage
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTIONTRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Station SquareMillbrae
ROMA Design Group
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIONOPEN SPACE PRESERVATION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Pacifica
Land has been urbanized 2 1/2 times fasterthan urban population has increased
Urban Population
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIONOPEN SPACE PRESERVATION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
UrbanizedLand
Population (millions)
Urbanized Land (square miles)
100 200 300 400
15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000
Urban Population
UrbanizedLand
Population (millions)
Urbanized Land (square miles)
100 200 300 400
15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000
70
13,000
150
60,000
1950
1990
Source: National Geographic
Projected for Development Through 2020Public Land or
Privately Protected Land
Conservation Easement
Owned in Fee
Urban Areas
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIONOPEN SPACE PRESERVATION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Lands Projected for Development through 2020
83,000 acres subject to conversion
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIONOPEN SPACE PRESERVATION
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Urban Growth Boundaries
LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITYLIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITYLIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITYLIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITYSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY
The Bay Area’s 46 Most Impoverished
Neighborhoods (NCCC 1997)
Very low-income neighborhoods
need reinvestment
while minimizing displacement
These neighborhood
residents need access to
quality jobs
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Definition of Impoverished Community:
Areas where a majority of households earn less than 80% of the County median income (1990)
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITYSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Impoverished
Communities In San Mateo County
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITYSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Educational Attainment
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
San Mateo County North Fair Oaks
Graduate or Professional Degree
Bachelor's DegreeAssociate DegreeSome College, No DegreeHigh School Graduate (Includes Equivalency)9th to 12th Grade,
No DiplomaLess than 9th Grade
Impoverished neighborhoods:
• Can benefit from Smart Growth
• May be significantly affected by Smart Growth
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITYSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development
Regional Livability Footprint Project
San Mateo CountySeptember 29, 2001
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
SMALL GROUP EXERCISESMALL GROUP EXERCISE
GOAL
Identify the most appropriate patterns for smart growth in San Mateo County.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
SMALL GROUP EXERCISESMALL GROUP EXERCISE
• Smart Growth Principles
• Land Use Mapping Exercise
• Affordable Housing
• Regulatory Changes and Incentives
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Review principles generated this morning.
• Add additional principles if desired.
MAPPING EXERCISEMAPPING EXERCISE
• Planning Areas
• Planning Area Categories
• Place Types
• Predictors
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLANNING AREASPLANNING AREAS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Areas where development
might be possibleNot an endorsement of
new development
PLANNING AREA CATEGORIESPLANNING AREA CATEGORIES
• Key Sites
• Residential Areas• Mixed-Use Areas• Town Centers/Downtowns• Employment Areas/Institutions
• Rail Stations/Major Transfer Facility Areas• Corridors
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPES MENUPLACE TYPES MENU
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE MANUALPLACE TYPE MANUAL
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPESPLACE TYPES
Varying mixes of residential and employment uses:
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Residential
• Mixed-Use
• Town Center/Downtown
• Employment Center/Institution
San Mateo
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
San Bruno
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
MIXED USEMIXED USE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
City Center ApartmentsRedwood City
Burlingame
MIXED-USEMIXED-USE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWNTOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN
DowntownSan Mateo
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWNTOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN
DowntownBurlingame
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTIONEMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION
Metro CenterFoster City CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTIONEMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Harbor Industrial Area
• Varying land uses and densities
within each Place Type
• Specify percentage of planning area to be changed
• Focus on the next 20 years
PLACE TYPE CHARACTERISTICSPLACE TYPE CHARACTERISTICS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
OTHER PLANNING AREA ASSIGNMENTSOTHER PLANNING AREA ASSIGNMENTS
•No Change (includes open space)
•New Place Type
•Percent Increase
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
•Broad brush, regional perspective
• County-wide interaction
APPROACHAPPROACH
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPE EXERCISEPLACE TYPE EXERCISE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
AFFORDABLE HOUSING MIXAFFORDABLE HOUSING MIX
Assign affordability mix to each planning area:
Category Default
Very Low Income 20%
Low Income 10%
Moderate Income 26%
Above Moderate Income 44%
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Fiscal Reform
• Monetary Incentives to Local Governments
• Regulatory Exemptions
• Transportation Improvements and Policies
• Monetary Incentives for Individuals
REGULATORY CHANGES AND INCENTIVESREGULATORY CHANGES AND INCENTIVES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development
Regional Livability Footprint Project
San Mateo CountySeptember 29, 2001
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT