Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Department of Child Services
Practice Indicator Reports
Published
For November 2011
November 2011
December 2011
Region 09
Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.
This report uses data collected over a rolling three month period ending with the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use a rolling three month period ending with the historical month listed. Reports Taken – This section has data regarding the reports taken during the three month period ending with the report month.
Count – This is the total number of reports of abuse or neglect that are entered into ICWIS during the period ending with the report month.
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs – This is the percentage of reports that are screened out divided by the total reports taken during the period ending with the report month.
Assessments Substantiated – This section has data regarding the number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the three month period ending with the report month.
Count – This is the total number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the period ending with the report month.
Percent Resulting in Removal – This is the percentage of substantiated assessments during the period that resulted in removal of the child from the home by the end of the report month divided by the total number of substantiated assessments during the period ending with the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care
For November 2011
Report Description
December 06 2011
Prepared by:
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
2
1,414 43.42% 93 40.86%
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care
Location Reports Taken
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs
For Sep 2011 to Nov 2011
Percent Resulting in Removal
CountCount
Assessments Substantiated
For Sep 2011 to Nov 2011
Statewide 36,262 39.0% 5,391 29.0%
Region 9
For November 2011
November 2011 Statewide Percent Removal Trend
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
29.2
30.330.8 30.8
30.4 30.630.3
28.9
27.226.9
27.6
28.729.0
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Percent Removal
Region 9 Percent Removal
Month Reports Taken
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs
For Sep 2011 to Nov 2011
Percent Resulting in Removal
CountCount
Assessments Substantiated
For Sep 2011 to Nov 2011 32.8
34.7 34.2
27.125.0
19.120.8
17.9 18.114.8
18.3
32.4
40.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Percent Removal
Boone 172 43.0% 11 54.5%
Hendricks 385 47.0% 17 41.2%
Montgomery 313 46.6% 26 53.8%
Morgan 336 39.0% 23 21.7%
Putnam 208 39.4% 16 37.5%
Nov 2011 1,414 43.4% 93 40.9%
Oct 2011 1,478 43.3% 105 32.4%
Sep 2011 1,531 41.0% 104 18.3%
Aug 2011 1,514 39.6% 122 14.8%
Jul 2011 1,563 39.4% 127 18.1%
Jun 2011 1,622 40.0% 123 17.9%
May 2011 1,720 41.4% 125 20.8%
Apr 2011 1,555 43.2% 115 19.1%
Mar 2011 1,577 41.9% 112 25.0%
Feb 2011 1,461 40.5% 118 27.1%
Jan 2011 1,599 36.8% 146 34.2%
Dec 2010 1,559 38.4% 196 34.7%
Nov 2010 1,656 38.9% 195 32.8%
December 06 2011
Prepared by:
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 3
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, a child with a non-custodial parent is considered “in home”. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. CHINS – This section has data regarding all children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
Foster Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
Out of Home Placements – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement.
Relative Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Foster Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Residential – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Other – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Example would be a court ordered unlicensed placement.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS Placements by County
For November 2011
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 4
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2011
CHINS Placements by County
Location Total CHINS
Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other
Count % Count %Count % Count %
Region 9 237 6662 84 20 5175 48.0 37.7 11.4 2.9
Statewide 12890 46113850 3501 742 1869,040 38.7 51.0 8.2 2.1
Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown
Region 9 Foster Care Placement Breakdown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
11-'1
0
12-'1
0
01-'1
1
02-'1
1
03-'1
1
04-'1
1
05-'1
1
06-'1
1
07-'1
1
08-'1
1
09-'1
1
10-'1
1
11-'1
1
Relative Foster Home Residential Other
Foster Care
Out of Home Placements
%
26.2
29.9
%
73.8
70.1
Count Count Count
CHINS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
11-'1
0
12-'1
0
01-'1
1
02-'1
1
03-'1
1
04-'1
1
05-'1
1
06-'1
1
07-'1
1
08-'1
1
09-'1
1
10-'1
1
11-'1
1
Relative Foster Home Residential Other
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
Month Total CHINS
Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other
Count % Count %Count % Count %
Foster Care
Out of Home Placements
% %Count Count Count
CHINS
Boone 37 410 16 5 227.0 59.3 14.8 18.5 7.427 73.0
Hendricks 43 98 21 4 118.6 60.0 25.7 11.4 2.935 81.4
Montgomery 78 2826 19 5 033.3 36.5 53.8 9.6 0.052 66.7
Morgan 43 139 16 3 220.9 47.1 38.2 8.8 5.934 79.1
Putnam 36 129 12 3 025.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 0.027 75.0
Nov 2011 237 6662 84 20 526.2 48.0 37.7 11.4 2.9175 73.8
Oct 2011 233 6665 77 21 427.9 45.8 39.3 12.5 2.4168 72.1
Sep 2011 247 5982 80 22 433.2 48.5 35.8 13.3 2.4165 66.8
Aug 2011 238 6468 82 22 228.6 48.2 37.6 12.9 1.2170 71.4
Jul 2011 256 7089 73 20 434.8 43.7 41.9 12.0 2.4167 65.2
Jun 2011 258 7682 77 20 331.8 43.8 43.2 11.4 1.7176 68.2
May 2011 267 8878 78 21 229.2 41.3 46.6 11.1 1.1189 70.8
Apr 2011 279 9583 75 22 429.7 38.3 48.5 11.2 2.0196 70.3
Mar 2011 294 9885 84 23 428.9 40.2 46.9 11.0 1.9209 71.1
Feb 2011 319 105106 81 22 533.2 38.0 49.3 10.3 2.3213 66.8
Jan 2011 339 112113 89 20 533.3 39.4 49.6 8.8 2.2226 66.7
Dec 2010 358 119123 91 20 534.4 38.7 50.6 8.5 2.1235 65.6
Nov 2010 366 130106 103 18 929.0 39.6 50.0 6.9 3.5260 71.0
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 5
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, children with non-custodial parents are considered to be in
their own home. IA Count – This is the number of children that have an open Informal Adjustment case on the last day of the report month. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. IA and In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month.
IA, In Home or Relative Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or Above) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.
Non Relative Foster Care – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or below) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Safely Home Families First by County
November 2011
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 6
Region 9 237 193 91
Statewide 12890 9170 5,539
Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown
Region 9 Foster Care Placement Breakdown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
11-'1
012
-'10
01-'1
102
-'11
03-'1
104
-'11
05-'1
106
-'11
07-'1
108
-'11
09-'1
110
-'11
11-'1
1
In Home or Relative Foster Care Target
68.0%
62.3%
32.0%
37.7%
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2011
Safely Home Families First by County
50%
50%
50%
50%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11-'1
012
-'10
01-'1
102
-'11
03-'1
104
-'11
05-'1
106
-'11
07-'1
108
-'11
09-'1
110
-'11
11-'1
1
In Home or Relative Foster Care Target
47
1819
Location Total CHINS
Non-Relative Foster Care
% %Count Count Count
IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care
Target (At or
Above) %
Target (At or Below)
%
IA
Count %Count
IA and In Home CHINS
109
5669
38.4%
38.5%
Location Total CHINS
Non-Relative Foster Care
% %Count Count Count
IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care
Target (At or
Above) %
Target (At or Below)
%
IA
Count %Count
IA and In Home CHINS
Boone 37 29 1172.5% 50%50% 27.5%3 13 32.5%
Hendricks 43 34 1470.8% 50%50% 29.2%5 13 27.1%
Montgomery 78 60 3364.5% 50%50% 35.5%15 41 44.1%
Morgan 43 44 1871.0% 50%50% 29.0%19 28 45.2%
Putnam 36 26 1563.4% 50%50% 36.6%5 14 34.1%
November 2011 237 193 9168.0% 50%50% 32.0%47 109 38.4%
October 2011 233 186 9167.1% 50%50% 32.9%44 109 39.4%
September 201 247 194 8569.5% 50%50% 30.5%32 114 40.9%
August 2011 238 188 8868.1% 50%50% 31.9%38 106 38.4%
July 2011 256 201 9468.1% 50%50% 31.9%39 128 43.4%
June 2011 258 197 9966.6% 50%50% 33.4%38 120 40.5%
May 2011 267 201 11164.4% 50%50% 35.6%45 123 39.4%
April 2011 279 208 12163.2% 50%50% 36.8%50 133 40.4%
March 2011 294 215 12563.2% 50%50% 36.8%46 131 38.5%
February 2011 319 227 13263.2% 50%50% 36.8%40 146 40.7%
January 2011 339 255 13765.1% 50%50% 34.9%53 166 42.3%
December 2010 358 262 14464.5% 50%50% 35.5%48 171 42.1%
November 2010 366 247 15761.1% 50%50% 38.9%38 144 35.6%
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 7
This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with their non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total Out of Home Placements – This is the total number of CHINS children that are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. Placed in Same County – This is the total number of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case. Percent Locally Placed – This is the percentage of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case divided by the total number of CHINS children which are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Locally Placed CHINS
For November 2011
Report Description
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
8
Locally Placed CHINS
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2011
175 102 58.3%
Location Total Out of Home
Placements
Placed in Same County
Percent Locally Placed
Statewide 9,040 6,387 70.7%
Region 9
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
71.771.8
71.0
71.5
71.1 71.1
71.3 71.2
70.7
70.9
70.6 70.670.7
69.8
70
70.2
70.4
70.6
70.8
71
71.2
71.4
71.6
71.8
72
Nov '1
0D
ec '1
0Ja
n '1
1Feb
'11
Mar
'11
Apr
'11
May
'11
Jun '1
1Ju
l '11
Aug '1
1S
ep '1
1O
ct '1
1N
ov '11
Statewide Percent Placed Locally
Region 9 Percent Placed Locally
62.3
59.6
60.2
58.7
59.8
58.2 58.2
59.759.3
60.6 60.6
61.9
58.3
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63N
ov '10
Dec
'10
Jan
'11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '1
1M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1
Month Total Out of Home
Placements
Placed in Same County
Percent Locally Placed
27 18 66.7%Boone
35 17 48.6%Hendricks
52 27 51.9%Montgomery
34 22 64.7%Morgan
27 18 66.7%Putnam
175 102 58.3%Nov 2011
168 104 61.9%Oct 2011
165 100 60.6%Sep 2011
170 103 60.6%Aug 2011
167 99 59.3%Jul 2011
176 105 59.7%Jun 2011
189 110 58.2%May 2011
196 114 58.2%Apr 2011
209 125 59.8%Mar 2011
213 125 58.7%Feb 2011
226 136 60.2%Jan 2011
235 140 59.6%Dec 2010
260 162 62.3%Nov 2010
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 9
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. Average Number of Placements Per Child – This is the total number of out of home placements for each CHINS child in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. This includes all placements during the current removal episode. If a child had at least one placement end in the first 8 days from removal, then that child's number of placements was reduced by one. This number is divided by the total number CHINS children who are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Average Number of Placements
For November 2011
Report Description
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 10
Location Average Number of
Placements Per Child
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2010 to November 2011
Average Number of Placements
Statewide Average Number of Placements
2.5
2.51
2.52
2.53
2.54
2.55
2.56
2.57
2.58
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Average Placements
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011 Region 9 Average Number of Placements
2.3
Statewide 2.6
Region 9
Month Average Number of Placements Per
Child
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Average Placements
1.8Boone
2.5Hendricks
2.2Montgomery
2.7Morgan
2.3Putnam
2.3November 2011
2.3October 2011
2.4September 2011
2.5August 2011
2.5July 2011
2.4June 2011
2.4May 2011
2.4April 2011
2.3March 2011
2.2February 2011
2.1January 2011
2.1December 2010
2.1November 2010
December 20 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 11
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with a non-custodial parent are considered to be in their own home. Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children are placed in the same resource with the same resource ID. Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placed together divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month. Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in out of home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Sibling Placement Report
For November 2011
Report Description
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
12
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
Location Count of Sibling Cases
Cases With All Children Placed
Together
Average Number of Children per
Case
Percent Placed Together of
Sibling Cases
43 32 2.5874.4%
Statewide 2248 1665 2.7074.1%
Region 970.6 70.6 70.7
71.6 71.9 71.9 71.9
72.7
73.6 73.7 73.673.2
74.1
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Percent Together
Statewide Percent Together
Region 9 Percent Together
DCS Practice Indicator Report
November 2011
Sibling Placement Report
66.2
58.662.1 63.6
68.4 66.0 64.7 64.4 62.868.3 71.1 70.7 74.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Percent Together
Month Count of Sibling Cases
Cases With All Children Placed
Together
Average Number of Children per
Case
Percent Placed Together of
Sibling Cases
Boone 6 4 3.1766.7%
Hendricks 8 8 2.25100.0%
Montgomery 13 9 2.6269.2%
Morgan 8 6 2.5075.0%
Putnam 8 5 2.5062.5%
November 2011 43 32 2.5874.4%
October 2011 41 29 2.5170.7%
September 2011 38 27 2.5571.1%
August 2011 41 28 2.5468.3%
July 2011 43 27 2.4762.8%
June 2011 45 29 2.4964.4%
May 2011 51 33 2.4964.7%
April 2011 53 35 2.5166.0%
March 2011 57 39 2.5368.4%
February 2011 55 35 2.5663.6%
January 2011 58 36 2.5762.1%
December 2010 58 34 2.6458.6%
November 2010 68 45 2.6266.2%
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 13
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children that were in out of home placement at the end of the month. It measures the number of days since the child was last removed from its home. One Year - 0 to 365 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 366 to 730 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 731 to 1095 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 1096 Days+– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Length Per Child – This column shows data for length of time of CHINS children who were in out of home placement at the end of the report month have been in out of home placement since the child’s last removal from their home.
Average- This column calculates the average or “mean” length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Median- This column calculates the median length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal
For November 2011
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
14
66 52 30 2737.7% 29.7% 17.1% 15.4% 621.6
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal
Location One Year0 to 365 Days
Two Years366 to 730 Days
Three Years731 to 1095 Days
Three + Years1096 Days+
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent
For November 2011
Average Median
Length Per Child
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
Statewide Median Length
Region 9 Median Length
4,102 2,198 1,177 1,56345.4% 24.3% 13.0% 17.3% 646.0Statewide 428.0
Region 9 471.5389
403398
402 402409
414 415
424 426 425429 428
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
440
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Median
424 424453
481 497533
508463
502 495523
476 472
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Median
Month One Year0 to 365 Days
Two Years366 to 730 Days
Three Years731 to 1095 Days
Three + Years1096 Days+
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Average Median
Length Per Child
11 13 1 240.7% 48.1% 3.7% 7.4% 467.4Boone 411.5
13 9 4 937.1% 25.7% 11.4% 25.7% 771.6Hendricks 498.3
18 14 15 534.6% 26.9% 28.8% 9.6% 614.9Montgomery 549.5
15 5 9 544.1% 14.7% 26.5% 14.7% 607.1Morgan 423.0
9 11 1 633.3% 40.7% 3.7% 22.2% 612.9Putnam 496.2
66 52 30 2737.7% 29.7% 17.1% 15.4% 621.6November 2011 471.5
61 52 28 2736.3% 31.0% 16.7% 16.1% 639.9October 2011 475.5
60 56 25 2436.4% 33.9% 15.2% 14.5% 641.8September 2011 523.1
63 58 23 2637.1% 34.1% 13.5% 15.3% 636.5August 2011 495.0
60 52 29 2635.9% 31.1% 17.4% 15.6% 666.2July 2011 502.3
71 45 30 3040.3% 25.6% 17.0% 17.0% 648.8June 2011 463.0
69 61 28 3136.5% 32.3% 14.8% 16.4% 643.3May 2011 508.3
71 63 36 2636.2% 32.1% 18.4% 13.3% 637.7April 2011 532.5
89 56 37 2742.6% 26.8% 17.7% 12.9% 599.3March 2011 496.6
92 58 35 2843.2% 27.2% 16.4% 13.1% 586.4February 2011 481.4
100 63 34 2944.2% 27.9% 15.0% 12.8% 560.0January 2011 453.0
107 63 35 3045.5% 26.8% 14.9% 12.8% 540.7December 2010 424.5
117 79 29 3545.0% 30.4% 11.2% 13.5% 528.0November 2010 424.0
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 15
This report uses CHINS and IA case types that have case type status end date occurring during the month. It then groups these cases using the closure reasons codes into categories of closure reasons. Case with closure reason code “Case opened in error – disregard” are filtered out for the purpose of this report. This report uses the reason codes selected by the worker at the date of case closure. Adoption closure reasons will not match the number of actual finalized adoptions reported from the hearing information fields in ICWIS/MaGik. Closure Reasons are group by:
Description Category Description Category
Child Reunited with Parents Reunification Case closed; AG case created Guardianship
Child never Removed from own home, wardship terminated
Reunification Child placed with relatives Relative
Extended wardship terminated (on court order for age 18 to 21)
Emancipation Child Placed with Legal guardian Guardianship
Child Returned to Primary Home Reunification Child Reached Age of Majority (age 18) Emancipation
Period of IA ended code used for Informal Adjustment cases only
Reunification Emancipated Court Ordered (age 18) Emancipation
Child Adoption Finalized Adoption Child Already Reunited with parent (s) when wardship terminated
Reunification
The Permanency column “Total” refers to the total case with reason codes in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories. The Permanency column “Total within 24 months” refers to the total case that ended within 24 month of the case status type begin date in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS and IA Permanency Report
For November 2011
Report Description
December 07 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
16
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS and IA Permanency Report
For November 2011
Statewide Permanency within 24 Months
Region 9 Permanency within 24 Months
Statewide
Region 985.0
82.9
86.1
88.4
87.0
85.5
83.7
85.1 85.1
82.8
80.0
82.1 81.7
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
533 103 16 46 23
5 1 0 0 0
Location
Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship Emanicipation
721
6
Total
Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes
81.7
100.0
24 Month Rate
589
6
Within 24 Months
Permanency
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
Location
Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship EmanicipationTotal
Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes
24 Month Rate
Within 24 Months
Permanency
100.0
70.0
81.887.5
93.187.5
69.2
88.594.7
76.5
57.1
77.8
100.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Boone 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.01
Hendricks 3 0 0 0 0 3 100.03
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA0
Morgan 0 1 0 0 0 1 100.01
Putnam 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.01
Nov 2011 5 1 0 0 0 6 100.06
Oct 2011 16 2 0 0 0 18 77.814
Sep 2011 3 3 0 1 0 7 57.14
Aug 2011 13 4 0 0 0 17 76.513
Jul 2011 15 1 0 2 1 19 94.718
Jun 2011 18 2 1 4 1 26 88.523
May 2011 8 5 0 0 0 13 69.29
Apr 2011 13 2 0 0 1 16 87.514
Mar 2011 26 2 0 1 0 29 93.127
Feb 2011 34 3 0 1 2 40 87.535
Jan 2011 16 5 0 1 0 22 81.818
Dec 2010 16 12 0 1 1 30 70.021
Nov 2010 13 3 0 1 0 17 100.017
December 07 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 17
This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:
• Father
• Mother
• Stepfather
• Stepmother
• Grandfather
• Grandmother
• Pre-adoptive father
• Pre-adoptive mother
• Adoptive grandparent
• Legal Guardian Children Out of Home Entire Month – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have a removal date prior to the first of the report month. Contact Information – This section of the reports shows information regarding FCM contacts (from the contact screens) during the report month. FCM with Family – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
FCM with Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with the child divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
FCM with Family and Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) AND the child during the report month. Contact with both had to have occurred for the child to be included in this section. The family and child do not need to present at the same contact, contact with each could have been made in two separate contacts.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Family Case Manager Contacts Report
For November 2011
Report Description
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
18
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2011
Family Case Manager Contacts Report
Location
Children
Statewide Child Contact Rate
Region 9 Child Contact Rate
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
168 61 36.3%
Statewide
Region 9
93.3
97.897.3
97.798.0
96.9
94.7
97.797.0
98.2
96.4
97.6
96.4
90.0
91.0
92.0
93.0
94.0
95.0
96.0
97.0
98.0
99.0N
ov '1
0D
ec '1
0Ja
n '11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '11
May
'11
Jun '1
1Ju
l '11
Aug
'11
Sep '1
1O
ct '1
1N
ov '1
1
Child Contact
Contact Information
FCM with Family
Rate Children
FCM with Child
Rate Children
FCM with Family and Child
Rate
Children out
of home entire month
61 36.3%162 96.4%
8,714 2,326 26.7% 2,279 26.2%8,446 96.9%
Month
Children
Contact Information
FCM with Family
Rate Children
FCM with Child
Rate Children
FCM with Family and Child
Rate
Children out of home entire
month
96.9
97.497.5
97.3
98.1
97.2
96.9
98.2
96.7
97.8
97.4
97.196.9
96.0
96.5
97.0
97.5
98.0
98.5
Nov
'10
Dec
'10
Jan '1
1Feb
'11
Mar
'11
Apr '
11M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '1
1Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov
'11
Child Contact
27 12 44.4%Boone 12 44.4%27 100.0%
32 16 50.0%Hendricks 16 50.0%32 100.0%
49 14 28.6%Montgomery 14 28.6%46 93.9%
33 16 48.5%Morgan 16 48.5%33 100.0%
27 3 11.1%Putnam 3 11.1%24 88.9%
168 61 36.3%Nov 2011 61 36.3%162 96.4%
165 47 28.5%Oct 2011 47 28.5%161 97.6%
165 43 26.1%Sep 2011 43 26.1%159 96.4%
163 51 31.3%Aug 2011 51 31.3%160 98.2%
168 51 30.4%Jul 2011 51 30.4%163 97.0%
175 71 40.6%Jun 2011 71 40.6%171 97.7%
188 75 39.9%May 2011 75 39.9%178 94.7%
195 85 43.6%Apr 2011 83 42.6%189 96.9%
205 81 39.5%Mar 2011 81 39.5%201 98.0%
213 73 34.3%Feb 2011 73 34.3%208 97.7%
223 74 33.2%Jan 2011 72 32.3%217 97.3%
232 69 29.7%Dec 2010 68 29.3%227 97.8%
252 80 31.7%Nov 2010 80 31.7%235 93.3%
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 19
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:
• Father
• Mother
• Stepfather
• Stepmother
• Grandfather
• Grandmother
• Pre-adoptive father
• Pre-adoptive mother
• Adoptive grandparent
• Legal Guardian Children out of home with case plan goal of reunification – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have reunification as the most recently entered primary case plan goal. Children with visits to their family during the month – This section of the report shows data regarding children who have had a visit with the child’s family (as described above) begin during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month with case plan goal of reunification(as described above).
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Child Visitation Report
For November 2011
Report Description
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
20
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For November 2011
Child Visitation Report
Location
Children
Statewide Visitation Rate
Region 9 Visitation Rate
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
74 38 51.4%
Statewide
Region 9
32.528.9
38.541.5
69.965.8
69.365.2
53.0
45.8
56.351.5 51.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0N
ov '1
0D
ec '1
0Ja
n '11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '11
May
'11
Jun '1
1Ju
l '11
Aug
'11
Sep '1
1O
ct '1
1N
ov '1
1
Visit Rate
Children with visits to
their family during the month
Rate
Children out of home
with case plan goal of reunification
4,786 1,011 21.1%
Month
17.3
21.523.6
25.1
27.626.3
22.824.1
25.927.0 26.9
25.1
21.1
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Nov
'10
Dec
'10
Jan '1
1Feb
'11
Mar
'11
Apr '
11M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '1
1Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov
'11
Visit Rate
Children
Chidlren with visits to their family during the
month
Rate
Children out of home with case plan goal of
reunification
Boone 14 8 57.1%
Hendricks 10 4 40.0%
Montgomery 22 9 40.9%
Morgan 18 10 55.6%
Putnam 10 7 70.0%
Nov 2011 74 38 51.4%
Oct 2011 68 35 51.5%
Sep 2011 71 40 56.3%
Aug 2011 72 33 45.8%
Jul 2011 66 35 53.0%
Jun 2011 66 43 65.2%
May 2011 75 52 69.3%
Apr 2011 79 52 65.8%
Mar 2011 93 65 69.9%
Feb 2011 94 39 41.5%
Jan 2011 104 40 38.5%
Dec 2010 114 33 28.9%
Nov 2010 126 41 32.5%
December 21 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 21
This is a description of the key elements used in this report.
Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Assessments during time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12
months prior to the month of the report).
Victim Selection – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period.
First Occurrence – This looks at the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect during the first 6 months of the time period (6 to 12 months prior to the month of the
report). If a child was a victim in multiple assessments with substantiated abuse or neglect, the assessment with the earliest report date is considered the first occurrence.
Recurrence Time Period – The time period used to see if a child is a substantiated victim in a recurring assessment of abuse or neglect is based off the report
date of the first occurrence. The recurrence period begins one day after the first occurrence report date and ends 183 after the first occurrence report date (>= 1st
Occurrence +1 and <= 1st Occurrence +183). If a child has multiple recurrences, the earliest report date in the recurring time period is considered the recurring
assessment.
Here is a visual representation of an example. This is a report for December of a given year. The time period to review assessments would run from Jan 1st to
Dec 31st. The time period for a first occurrence would be Jan 1
s t to Jun 30
th. If a child had a first occurrence on Feb 7
th, the recurrence period would run from Feb
8th to Aug 9
th. If the child had a recurrence in Aug 5
th, that would be considered repeat maltreatment. If the child had a recurrence Oct 10
th, that would not be
considered repeat maltreatment because it fell outside the recurrence period.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Time Period (Jan 1st to Dec 31
st)
1st Occurrence Time Period (Jan 1
st to Jun 30
th)
Recurrence Period (Feb 8th
to Aug 9th)
Percent of absence of repeat maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children with a first occurrence minus the number of children with a recurrence. The denominator is the number of children with first occurrence.
(1st Occurrence – Recurrence)
1st Occurrence
For the purposes of this report, the county the child is assigned to is based off the county of first occurrence. If a child has a recurrence in a different county, the repeat will show for the county of the first occurrence.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
For November 2011
Report Description
December 05 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
22
189 178 94.18%
9,931 9,152 92.16%Statewide
Region 9
Statewide Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
Region 9 Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
92.2
9
92.1
0
92.2
4
92.3
7
92.4
8
92.8
1
93.0
5
93.4
1
93.4
6 92.9
1
92.5
7
92.4
4
92.1
6
90.50
91.00
91.50
92.00
92.50
93.00
93.50
94.00
94.50
95.00
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard
County Absence of Repeat
Maltreatment Percent
Victims from Dec 2010 to
Jun 2011
Victims without a recurrence within 6
months
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
For November 2011
November 2011
Region 9 For November 2010 to November 2011
County Victims from Dec 2010 to
Jun 2011
Absence of Repeat
Maltreatment Percent
Victims without a recurrence within 6
months
92.8
1
93.8
7 92.6
4
92.9
7
91.2
2
92.6
2
91.9
6
91.7
4
93.7
1
93.0
3
96.0
7
95.6
3
94.1
8
88.00
89.00
90.00
91.00
92.00
93.00
94.00
95.00
96.00
97.00
11-
'10
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard
94.60%
94.60%
National Standard
National Standard
26 23 88.46%Boone 94.60%
35 32 91.43%Hendricks 94.60%
66 63 95.45%Montgomery 94.60%
41 39 95.12%Morgan 94.60%
21 21 100.00%Putnam 94.60%
189 178 94.18%November 2011 94.60%
206 197 95.63%October 2011 94.60%
229 220 96.07%September 2011 94.60%
287 267 93.03%August 2011 94.60%
302 283 93.71%July 2011 94.60%
327 300 91.74%June 2011 94.60%
373 343 91.96%May 2011 94.60%
393 364 92.62%April 2011 94.60%
410 374 91.22%March 2011 94.60%
384 357 92.97%February 2011 94.60%
394 365 92.64%January 2011 94.60%
424 398 93.87%December 2010 94.60%
417 387 92.81%November 2010 94.60%
December 05 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 23
This is a description of the key elements used in this report.
Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Assessments during the time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time
period (12 months prior to the month of the report).
Victim of maltreatment in Foster Care – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period where the perpetrator is a foster parent or institutional staff.
Children in Foster Care during the time period – All CHINS children with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month
of the report. Also included are Probation children (who are IV-E eligible) with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Percent of absence of maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children in foster care minus the
number of victims of maltreatment in foster care. The denominator is the number of children in foster care.
(Children in Foster Care – Victims of maltreatment in Foster Care) Children in Foster Care
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
For November 2011
Report Description
December 02 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
24
19,893 37 99.81%Statewide
Region 9 453 1 99.78%
Statewide Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
99.6
3
99.6
4
99.6
7
99.6
9
99.7
0
99.7
1
99.7
0
99.7
4
99.7
4
99.7
7
99.7
6
99.7
8
99.8
1
99.4
99.5
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
100
11- '
1012
- '10
01- '
1102
- '11
03- '
1104
- '11
05- '
1106
- '11
07- '
1108
- '11
09- '
1110
- '11
11- '
11
Maltreatment Standard
Region 9 Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
Location Absence of Maltreatment
Percent
For November 2011
Children in Foster Care
from Dec 2010 to Nov 2011
Substantiated Victims in Foster
Care
Region 9 for November 2010 to November 2011
Month Children in Foster Care
from Dec 2010 to Nov 2011
Substantiated Victims in Foster
Care
National Standard
99.68%
Absence of Maltreatment
Percent
National Standard
99.68%
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
For November 2011
99.5
1
99.1
8
99.1
7
99.3
2
99.4
8
99.4
4
99.4
4
99.4
2
99.3
9
99.3
7
99.1
4
99.1
4
99.7
8
98.6
98.8
99
99.2
99.4
99.6
99.8
100
11- '
1012
- '10
01- '
1102
- '11
03- '
1104
- '11
05- '
1106
- '11
07- '
1108
- '11
09- '
1110
- '11
11- '
11
Maltreatment Standard
Boone 70 0 100.00% 99.68%
Hendricks 91 0 100.00% 99.68%
Montgomery 132 0 100.00% 99.68%
Morgan 89 0 100.00% 99.68%
Putnam 71 1 98.59% 99.68%
November 2011 453 1 99.78% 99.68%
October 2011 465 4 99.14% 99.68%
September 2011 465 4 99.14% 99.68%
August 2011 477 3 99.37% 99.68%
July 2011 489 3 99.39% 99.68%
June 2011 519 3 99.42% 99.68%
May 2011 533 3 99.44% 99.68%
April 2011 537 3 99.44% 99.68%
March 2011 575 3 99.48% 99.68%
February 2011 592 4 99.32% 99.68%
January 2011 600 5 99.17% 99.68%
December 2010 611 5 99.18% 99.68%
November 2010 614 3 99.51% 99.68%
December 02 2011
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 25