1
Recurrent selection for resistance to pink stem borer The maize composite EPS12 has been chosen as the base population for a breeding program for resistance to the pink stem borer (Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.). The main selection criterion was resistance to stem tunneling. Yield was taken as a secondary selection criterion to avoid unwanted negative correlated response on this character. Objectives.- (1) to determine direct and indirect responses of the maize population to selection, (2) to study the effect of selection on larvae growth and mortality, (3) to monitor the impact of selection on the genetic structure of EPS12, and (4) to identify loci at which allelic frequencies changed significantly due to directional selection A Butrón, G Sandoya, R Santiago, B Ordás, R A Malvar Misión Biológica de Galicia – CSIC. Apdo 28 36080. Pontevedra, Spain (1) The three cycles of selection reduced damage by Sesamia nonagrioides and Ostrinia nubilalis, and unfavorable changes were not observed on agronomical traits. The small response to selection could be consequence of the positive correlation between yield and stem tunneling. Damage by Sesamia nonagrioides Lef. 10% of S 1 families were selected Crosses to obtain S 1 families (3) Genetic diversity was reduced over the selection process, but not significantly (Table 2). There is enough variability to continue the selection scheme. Cycles C ycles x A639 C ycles x B93 C ycles x EP42 50 55 60 65 70 75 0 1 2 3 4 C ycles ofselection Tunnel length (cm ) Table 1. Value of the log-rank statistic for testing homogeneity of survival curves of pink stem borer larvae fed with leaves, sheaths and pith of EPS12C0, EPS12C2, and EPS12C3 _________________________________________________________ Pith Leaf Sheath _____________ ______________ _____________ EPS12C0 31.7 a -5.15a 2.4 a -4.9a -11.0ab - 6.5ab EPS12C2 7.4 b 12.41a -13.1b -17.8ab -2.8a -0.6a EPS12C3 -39.1c -7.27a 0.5 ab -11.0a -10.1ab -28.2c __________________________________________________________ _ In each column, means follow by the same letter did not differ at 0.05. (2) Althouh variability for antibiosis was present, leaf, sheath and pith antibiosis against pink stem borer larvae has not been significantly improved over the selection process for less stalk tunneling (Table 1). Tabla 2. Genetic diversity of the maize composite EPS12 and two populations derived from it following two selection cycles. __________________________________________________________ _____ Selection Polymorphic Alleles per Cycles SSR locus He 1 Ho 2 f 3 σ 2 G __________________________________________________________ _____ EPS12 70 3.29 0.4639 0.4471 0.0364* 15.33 * EPS12(S)C2 68 2.87 0.4078 0.3977 0.0248 2.04 * EPS12(S)C3 64 2.53 0.3846 0.3832 0.0037 0.22 * __________________________________________________________ _____ 1 Mean expected heterozygosity. Standard deviations in EPS12, EPS12(S)C2 and EPS12(S)C3 were 0.2108, 0.2229 y 0.2268, respectively 2 Mean observed heteozygosity. 3 Fixation index. * Significantly different from zero at 0.05 probability level. Tabla 3. 2 for deviations from random drift (Deviation 2) and for directional selection (Linear 2) of significant allelic frequency changes at SSR markers in EPS12 during selection for resistance to pink stem borer. __________________________________________________________ __ Bin SSR marker Allele Deviation 2 Linear 2 __________________________________________________________ __ 4.06 umc1329 1 9.380* 9.373* 4.06 umc1329 2 9.380* 9.373* 4.11 phi076 1 9.780* 6.760* 4.11 phi076 3 9.780* 6.760* 6.03 umc1887 1 9.380* 4.758 __________________________________________________________ __ * Significant at 0.01 probability level. (4) Although the loss of genetic variation was generally consistent with that expected in a model in which random genetic drift acts alone, directional selection was acting on loci umc1329 and phi076 (Table 3). The significant effect of directional selection on some markers suggests the presence of QTLs controlling the selection trait or traits linked to these markers.

Recurrent selection for resistance to pink stem borer

  • Upload
    cathal

  • View
    57

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Butrón , G Sandoya, R Santiago, B Ordás, R A Malvar Misión Biológica de Galicia – CSIC. Apdo 28 36080 . Pontevedra, Spain. Recurrent selection for resistance to pink stem borer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Recurrent selection for resistance to pink stem borer

Recurrent selection for resistance to pink stem borer

The maize composite EPS12 has been chosen as the base population for a breeding program for resistance to the pink stem borer (Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.). The main selection criterion was resistance to stem tunneling. Yield was taken as a secondary selection criterion to avoid unwanted negative correlated response on this character.

Objectives.- (1) to determine direct and indirect responses of the maize population to selection, (2) to study the effect of selection on larvae growth and mortality, (3) to monitor the impact of selection on the genetic structure of EPS12, and (4) to identify loci at which allelic frequencies changed significantly due to directional selection

A Butrón, G Sandoya, R Santiago, B Ordás, R A Malvar

Misión Biológica de Galicia – CSIC. Apdo 28 36080. Pontevedra, Spain

(1) The three cycles of selection reduced damage by Sesamia nonagrioides and Ostrinia nubilalis, and unfavorable changes were not observed on agronomical traits. The small response to selection could be consequence of the positive correlation between yield and stem tunneling.

Damage by Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.

10% of S1 families were selectedCrosses to obtain S1 families

(3) Genetic diversity was reduced over the selection process, but not significantly (Table 2). There is enough variability to continue the selection scheme.

Cycles

Cycles x A639

Cycles x B93

Cycles x EP42

50

55

60

65

70

75

0 1 2 3 4

Cycles of selection

Tu

nn

el l

en

gth

(c

m)

Table 1. Value of the log-rank statistic for testing homogeneity of survival curves of pink stem borer larvae fed with leaves, sheaths and pith of EPS12C0, EPS12C2, and EPS12C3_________________________________________________________

Pith Leaf Sheath _____________ ______________ _____________EPS12C0 31.7a -5.15a 2.4a -4.9a -11.0ab -6.5abEPS12C2 7.4b 12.41a -13.1b -17.8ab -2.8a -0.6aEPS12C3 -39.1c -7.27a 0.5ab -11.0a -10.1ab -28.2c___________________________________________________________In each column, means follow by the same letter did not differ at 0.05.

(2) Althouh variability for antibiosis was present, leaf, sheath and pith antibiosis against pink stem borer larvae has not been significantly improved over the selection process for less stalk tunneling (Table 1).

Tabla 2. Genetic diversity of the maize composite EPS12 and two populations derived from it following two selection cycles._______________________________________________________________

Selection Polymorphic Alleles perCycles SSR locus He1 Ho2 f3 σ2

G

_______________________________________________________________EPS12 70 3.29 0.4639 0.4471 0.0364* 15.33 *EPS12(S)C2 68 2.87 0.4078 0.3977 0.0248 2.04 *EPS12(S)C3 64 2.53 0.3846 0.3832 0.0037 0.22 *_______________________________________________________________1 Mean expected heterozygosity. Standard deviations in EPS12, EPS12(S)C2 and EPS12(S)C3 were 0.2108, 0.2229 y 0.2268, respectively2 Mean observed heteozygosity.3 Fixation index.* Significantly different from zero at 0.05 probability level.

Tabla 3. 2 for deviations from random drift (Deviation 2) and for directional selection (Linear 2) of significant allelic frequency changes at SSR markers in EPS12 during selection for resistance to pink stem borer.____________________________________________________________Bin SSR marker Allele Deviation 2 Linear 2 ____________________________________________________________4.06 umc1329 1 9.380* 9.373*4.06 umc1329 2 9.380* 9.373*4.11 phi076 1 9.780* 6.760*4.11 phi076 3 9.780* 6.760*6.03 umc1887 1 9.380* 4.758____________________________________________________________* Significant at 0.01 probability level.

(4) Although the loss of genetic variation was generally consistent with that expected in a model in which random genetic drift acts alone, directional selection was acting on loci umc1329 and phi076 (Table 3). The significant effect of directional selection on some markers suggests the presence of QTLs controlling the selection trait or traits linked to these markers.