19
Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers by Hussain Alzaher and Noman Tasadduq Electrical Engineering Department King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

  • Upload
    eddy

  • View
    61

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers. by Hussain Alzaher and Noman Tasadduq Electrical Engineering Department King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Objective. Present fully differential CF/CA topologies . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current

Followers/Amplifiers by

Hussain Alzaher and Noman Tasadduq

Electrical Engineering DepartmentKing Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals

Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Page 2: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

3

Objective

Present fully differential CF/CA topologies. Investigate their characteristics. Compare and identify the best topology. Confirm the results using simulation. Give an application example.

Page 3: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

4

Introduction

Why Fully Differential Architecture?

Fully differential architectures are essential to enhance the performance of mixed signal applications in terms of

Supply noise rejection. Dynamic range. Harmonic distortion.

Page 4: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

5

Introduction

Theory behind fully differential opamp realization is well established.

Current Amplifier is the core analog building block for current mode circuits. Its fully differential realization is still under research.

Page 5: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

6

Introduction

Current Amplifier (CA)/Current Follower (CF)

Conveys input current from a low impedance input terminal (X) to a high impedance output terminal (Z).

For a CA, current is conveyed with gain K. CF is a special case of CA in which gain (K) equals one. Can be classified as positive (input and output currents are

both going in the same direction) or the negative type (having currents in opposite directions).

IX

X ZpCAKIX IX

X ZnCAKIX

CA with +ve output CA with -ve output

Page 6: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

7

Low Power Current Amplifier

M13 M9 M10

M11VDD

M12

ISB

M3

M4

M8M7

M6M5

VDD

VSS

X ZpM2 M1

M20

IBP

Zn

M14

M15

M16

M17

M18

M19

K

1 K

1 K

K

M21

Single Input Dual Output Class-AB CA/CF

IX

XZn

ZpCA

KIX

KIX

Izp = -Izn = KIx

Vx=0

Page 7: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

8

Fully Differential CA (FDCA)

Four terminal device, with two input and two output currents.

1 2o o o diff diff cm cmI I I A I A I

Xp

Xn Zn

Zp Io1

Io2

I1

I2

Differential output current can be expressed as,

Ideally, Acm = 0.

Page 8: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

9

FDCA Topologies

X ZpCF

XZp

ZnCAI1

I2 I2

I1-I2

Io1=K(I1-I2)

Io2=K(I2-I1)

1

2

Topology ‘a’I1

XZn

ZpCA

XZn

ZpCA

I2

I1

I2

I2

I1

Io1=K(I1-I2)

Io2=K(I2-I1)

1

2

Topology ‘b’

Topology ‘c’

X ZpCF

X ZpCA

X ZpCF

X ZpCA

I1a

I1b

I2b

I2a

I2b

I1b

Io2=K(I2b-I1a)

Io1=K(I1b-I2a)

2

1

3

4

I1

I2

Adiff =2K

Adiff =2K

Adiff =K

Page 9: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

10

FDCA Topologies

Topology ‘a’

2 2 1( )( 1) / 2adiff p n pA K K K

Non-ideal Differential mode gain

Non-Ideal Common mode gain

_ 2 2 1( )( 1)cm a p n pA K K K

Error in Kp1 causes finite common mode output. When current gain Kp1 is represented by first order lowpass model,

common-mode gain exhibits highpass response.

Not suitable for high frequency applications.

Disadvantages

Advantages Lowest power consumption as compared to other two topologies.

X ZpCF

X Zp

ZnCAI1

I2 I2

I1-I2

Io1=K(I1-I2)

Io2=K(I2-I1)

1

2

1 1/( / 1)p oK s /( )acm oA s s i.e. if, and CF1 ideal

Page 10: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

11

FDCA Topologies

Non-ideal Differential mode gain

Non-ideal Common mode gain

Slightly higher power consumption than topology ‘a’. Lower output resistance as compared to topologies ‘a’ and ‘c’.

Disadvantages

Topology ‘b’

1 2 1 2( ) / 2bdiff n n p pA K K K K

_ 1 2 1 2( ) ( )cm b n n p pA K K K K

Advantages Lower power consumption than topology ‘c’. Widest bandwidth (as will be shown in simulation results) Symmetric input and output resistances.

I1

XZn

ZpCA

XZn

ZpCA

I2

I1

I2

I2

I1

Io1=K(I1-I2)

Io2=K(I2-I1)

1

2

Page 11: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

12

FDCA Topologies

Non-ideal Differential mode gain

Non-ideal Common mode gain

Highest power consumption. Most no. of active elements.Ideal differential gain

Disadvantages

Advantages Smallest input R. Output R= twice that of ‘b’

Topology ‘c’

2 1 4 2 3 4 1 1 2 2[ (1 ) (1 )] / 2cdiff p p p p p pA K K K K K K

2 1 4 2 3 4 1 1 2 2( ) [ (1 ) (1 )]ccm p p p p p pA

X ZpCF

X ZpCA

X ZpCF

X ZpCA

I1a

I1b

I2b

I2a

I2b

I1b

Io2=K(I2b-I1a)

Io1=K(I1b-I2a)

2

1

3

4

I1

I2

Io= K(I1b-I2a)-K(I2b-I1a)=K(I1b+I1a)-K(I2a+I2b)=K(I1-I2)

Io1=K(I1b-I2a) and Io2= K(I2b-I1a)

Page 12: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

13

Simulation Results

Biasing Conditions

TSMC 0.18m CMOS process.Supply voltage = ±1.5V.

IBP=40µA and ISB=10µA.

Page 13: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

14

Simulation Results

Differential-mode DC operation for the three topologies

All three topologies have comparable DC performance

Page 14: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

15

Simulation Results

Differential-mode AC response for the three topologies

Topology ‘a’

57MHzTopology ‘b’

77MHz

Topology ‘c’36MHz

Topology ‘b’ has the widest bandwidth

Page 15: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

16

Simulation Results

Ideal Common-mode AC responses

Topology ‘b’ and ‘c’ have excellent common-mode response.

Topology ‘a’ has common mode gain dependent on frequency.

Page 16: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

18

Application Example

Fully Differential Current-Mode Sallen-Key Highpass filterUsing Topology ‘b’

Xp

Xn Zn

Zp

Io1 IopI1

I2 Io2

R1C2 C1

R1

C2 C1 Ion

Iip

Iin

R2

R2

21 2 1 2

21 2 1 2 1 2 2

( )( ) 1HP

s C C R RH s

s C C R R s C C R

Page 17: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

19

Application ExampleMagnitude response of the Sallen-Key Highpass filter

Results in good agreement

Page 18: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

21

ConclusionTopology ‘a’

+: Least power consumption.

- : Freq. dependent Acm.

Topology ‘c’

+: Best Rin and Rout.

- : Power consumption and area are highest.

- : Differential-mode bandwidth is narrowest.

- : Mismatch results show freq. dependent Acm.

Topology ‘b’

-+: Consumes slightly more power than ‘a’ but much lower than ‘c’.

+: Widest differential-mode bandwidth.

+: Frequency independent common-mode gain. Best solution for high freq. applications.

Page 19: Realizations of CMOS Fully Differential Current Followers/Amplifiers

23

THANK YOU