Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò
Radiation Shielding for FEE Downstream Wall (Wall 2)
Alberto Fassò, Mario Santana, James Liu, Toshiya Sanami, Stan Mao and Sayed Rokni
Radiation Protection DepartmentStanford Linear Accelerator Center
RSC May 30, 2007
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 2 / 40 -
OUTLINEIntroduction
Layout
Scope and design goal
Strategy of the calculations
Source terms
Key components
Part I: Dose rate in NEH from cascades created in FEE by...
400 mW bremsstrahlung entering the FEE
Part II: Dose rate in NEH from...
losses in BYD1, propagated through wall 1 and wall 2.
Conclusions & Discussion
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 3 / 40 -
Overall LayoutOverall Layout
Undulator Hall (UH)
786 m(1/ 2 m ile)
X- Rays
Wall 1
Front End Enclosure (FEE)
Near Experimental Hall (NEH)
Beam Transport Hall (BTH)
CY38 Z = 49600 cm
BYD1 Z = 68725 cm
Personnel
Wall 2
Bfw33 Z = 64588 cm
Elect rons
Main dump
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 4 / 40 -
Layout of the LCLS dump line, FEE and NEH
(3’ iron + 3’ concrete)vacuum pipe openings 4” diameter
M0 Mirrors
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 5 / 40 -
ScopeRequest review only of the design and implementation of
the bulk shielding of Wall 2, consisting of:
3 feet of iron
3 feet of concrete
Changes may be expected for the actual design of several key components
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 6 / 40 -
Design goals
The main goal is to limit the dose rate in the NEH to 0.05 mrem/h (100 mrem/y)
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 7 / 40 -
Strategy of the calculations
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 8 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
From CX, CY...
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 9 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
< 400 mW
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 10 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Wall 2 bulk
shielding
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 11 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Wall 2 bulk
shielding
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 12 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Fence?
Wall 2 bulk
shielding
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 13 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IB: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm)
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
High dose around HEL
- > shielding required
Source of
radiation
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 14 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IB: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm)
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Hutch shutters
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 15 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IB: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm)
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Pipe shield AND / OR Fence
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 16 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IC: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm), Real wall
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 17 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART II: Muon dose from BYD1
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Wall 1 bulk
shielding
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 18 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART II: Muon dose from BYD1
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Wall 2 bulk
shielding
Local
Shield
Dose BYD1 < 0.005 mrem/ h
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 19 / 40 -
Source termsPART I (FLUKA): 400 mW of nominal bremsstrahlung spectrum into the FEE that.
produces showers in FEE, which go through Wall 2 and induce dose in the NEH.
integrates the contribution from collimators, insertion devices and (mainly) BYD.
is simulated as 1 kW of e (13.64 GeV, 37 RMS) hitting a 14 micron Ti foil.
PART II (MARS15): Radiation produced upstream of FEE and going all the
way through Wall 1 and Wall 2. For example:
Dominant: 5 W grazing the lateral walls of BYD1.
Other sources: main dump, tdund,... are negligible.
Synchrotron radiation and FEL are not an issue in this case.
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 20 / 40 -
Key components
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 21 / 40 -
Elevation view
NEHFEEBYD
PART I (FLUKA)
PART II (MARS15)
xz
y
400mWbremsstrahlung
Wall 2Z = 75640 cm
Wall 1Z = 71981 cm
Fe shadow wall (208 (H) × 97 (W) x 31 (L) cm3) with opening for beam pipe 14 (H) x 31 (W) x 31 (L) cm3
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 22 / 40 -
M0 and M1 mirrors: t ilted 1.44 mrad, 100 cm long, 3 cm wide, 8 cm thick
Sections of the FLUKA geometry(strongly anamorphic)
C1
M0
C2
C3
C4brem
M1
FEE
H1
H2
H3
brem
C1, C2, C3, C4: collimators M0, M1: mirrors
iron
concrete FEE
H1
horizontal plane Vertical plane
1cm ~7.7cm
W alloy
18 g/ cm 3B4C
6.15
07 cm
0.5
0 cm
Collimators
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 23 / 40 -
Hutch ShuttersThickness ~ 16 cm (W) to achieve attenuation from 2000 to 0.05 mrem/h
B4C protects shutter from FEL
This is a conceptual design, thermal studies need to be done
beam pipe and C3 collimator + shutters closed L = 8.25 cm
L1 = 1 cm
L = 3.25''
WB4C
x
zy zx
y
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 24 / 40 -
'Realistic' wall 2 with plugs, holes...
18''
< 0.2''
15''x
Z
z
y
A - A'
x
z
A A'
B
B '
16 x D= 3.81 cmbars 5/ 6 of length0.16 cm air around bars x
5''
3''
y
B - B'
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 25 / 40 -
Part INominal 400 mW Bremsstrahlung into FEE
A) Collimators aligned
C3
C4
C2
C1
M0
M1
B) Collimator C2 misaligned
C) Realistic wall
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 26 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IA: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, normal operation
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
Wall 2 bulk
shielding
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 27 / 40 -
Dose in NEH for 400 mW into FEEA. Normal operation
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
NEH
0.03
0.3
NEH
z
y
In the normal configuration
(with the local shielding)
doses in the NEH are very low.
The radiation is dominated by
muons. An exclusion zone is
required in a small conical
zone around the HEL (dZ = 1.5
m, dY ~ 1 m)
[mrem/h]
0.05
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 28 / 40 -
Dose in NEH for 400 mW into FEEA. Normal operation
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
NEH
0.03
0.3
NEH
z
y
In the normal configuration
(with the local shielding)
doses in the NEH are very low.
The radiation is dominated by
muons. An exclusion zone is
required in a small conical
zone around the HEL (dZ = 1.5
m, dY ~ 1 m)
[mrem/h]
0.05
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 29 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IB: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm)
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
High dose around HEL
- > shielding required
Source of
radiation
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 30 / 40 -
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
NE
H
0.03
0.3
NEHNEH
Dose in NEH for 400 mW into FEE
NEH
Shutters OUT Shutters INShutters OUT Shutters OUTC2 misaligned C2 aligned
[mrem/h]
0.05 0.05
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 31 / 40 -
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
NE
H
0.03
0.3
NEHNEH
Dose in NEH for 400 mW into FEE
NEH
Shutters OUT Shutters INShutters OUT Shutters OUTC2 misaligned C2 aligned
If shutters are IN, dose in NEH is independent of alignment.
If shutters are OUT and collimators are misaligned, then
the dose in NEH increases. Mit igation will be discussed in
next RSC meeting.
[mrem/h]
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 32 / 40 -
Dose in NEH: Contributions and shieldingPART IC: Bremsstrahlung into FEE, C2 misaligned (dX = 10 mm), Realistic wall
Undulator main dump hall
FEE NEH
C1 C2 C3 C4M0 M1
Wal
l 1
Shad
owW
all
Wal
l 2BYD1 PCPM1
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 33 / 40 -
Solid wall Wall with plugs and gaps (filled with heavy concrete)
Total dose rate [mrem/ h] at the photon level
No visible difference in the south corner and in correspondence with the stepped plug
Effect of the holes and slits of the real wallShutters open, iron shield, C2 misaligned
z
yx
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
[mrem/h]
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 34 / 40 -
Solid wall Wall with plugs and gaps (filled with heavy concrete)
Total dose rate [mrem/ h] at the photon level
No visible difference in the south corner and in correspondence with the stepped plug
Effect of the holes and slits of the real wallShutters open, iron shield, C2 misaligned
z
yx
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
[mrem/h]
No major difference observed between the solid wall and
the realist ic wall.
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 35 / 40 -
Prompt dose in the upper floorshutters open, collimators misaligned, realistic wall
➢ Dose on the upper floor of NEH negligible despite top gap
➢ No effect of earthquake holes
[mrem/h]x
y
z
7.5E+065.0E+061.6E+065.0E+051.6E+055.0E+041.6E+045.0E+031.6E+035.0E+021.6E+025.0E+011.6E+015.0E001.6E005.0E011.6E015.0E021.6E025.0E031.6E035.0E044.6E05
x
y
z
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 36 / 40 -
Part IIDose rate in NEH from
5 W electron beam continuous loss in BYD1
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 37 / 40 -
5W electron on BYD#1
Beam dump hall FEE NEH
< 0.0025
mrem/ h
< 0.025
mrem/ h
[mSv/ h]
[mrem/ h]
Aspect ratio 1:2
< 0.025
mrem/ h0.0025
mrem/ h
x
y
z
y
x
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 38 / 40 -
Conclusions
[email protected]@slac.stanford.eduRSC – FEE Wall 2 - 05/ 30/ 07Mario Santana Leitner - Alberto Fassò - 39 / 40 -
Wall 2, with 3' iron + 3' concrete is adequate (<0.05 mrem/h) if:
Beam loss in BYD1 is limited to 5 W
Insertion of devices is interlocked to 30 Hz and no high Z material is used.
1' iron shadow wall is placed after M0 (ray tracing needed to optimize design)
Small area in hutch 1 (1.5 m L – 1m W) is fenced out
Mitigation is designed for the condition of collimator misalignments and shutters out.
The design of the hutch shutters is appropriate, although thermal
calculations are required.