Upload
barbara-fox
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quick Survey Do you agree or disagree with the
following: Parties do more to confuse the issues
than to provide a clear choice on issues.
The best way to vote is to pick a candidate regardless of party label.
It would be better if we put no party labels on the ballot at all.
The Definition of Party organizations that recruit and
sponsor candidates for public office under the organization's name.
The aim of parties is to establish control of government at a particular level.
Functions of Parties organized critique of the party in
power a choice of leaders and programs recruit and nominate electoral
candidates Provide cues to voters Mobilize voters
Characteristics of the American Party System Federalism highly fragmented
and localism – parties most elections are at local level 50 state party organizations governed
by state, not national, laws National party only during presidential
elections New Deal Coalition- farmers, labor,
blacks, and south?
The Democratic Parties Democratic National Committee Senate Democratic caucus, House
Democratic Caucus NY Democratic Party NY Assembly Democratic Caucus NY Senate Democratic Caucus Saratoga County Democratic party Saratoga Springs Democratic party
Primary & General Elections
Democratic Primary
Republican Primary
GeneralElection
Primary Election Intraparty, nominationGeneral Election Interparty, election
Two Party Duopoly
0 10 20 30 40 50Percent of Popular Vote
Youngkeit (Independent)Dodge (Prohibition)
Venson (Independent)Lane (Grassroots)
Brown (Independent)Moorehead (World Workers)
McReynolds (Socialist)Smith (Libertarian)
Harris (Socialist Workers)Hagelin (Natural Law)Phillips (Constitution)Browne (Libertarian)Buchanan (Reform)
Nader (Green)Bush (Republican)Gore (Democratic)
How Many Political Parties?
0 2 4 6 8 10Effective Number of Parties, circa 2000
VenezuelaUnited States
United KingdomSwitzerland
SpainRussiaPoland
PanamaNetherlands
MexicoJapanIsrael
IrelandIndonesia
IndiaGermany
FranceFinland
DenmarkCosta Rica
CanadaBrazil
BoliviaBelgiumAustralia
ArgentinaAlbania
Why 2 Parties?
Plurality Rule 2 Parties
Proportional Representation Multiple Parties
Why?1) Psychological Effect2) Mechanical Effect
2000 ElectionDem 48.3%Rep 48.0%Green 2.6%Reform .4%
Note: FEC, ballot access laws, party funding rules, debate criteria etc. …
Duverger’s Law:
2 Party System-Why
United States Electoral system Winner take all Ballot access laws/campaign finance
system France- 2 rounds
First round, all parties participate Runoff election between 2 top parties
Single Member Simple Plurality SMSP System
GOP 40% Winner Dem 35% Green 25%
Proportional System 40% seats GOP, 35% Dem, 25% Green
SM majority system, runoff elections 2nd election between GOP and Dem
candidate
Societal Consensus United States--Less ideological/religious
cleavages Separation of church and state Desirability of capitalism, free markets
France Desirability of revolution Desirability of capitalism Desirability of religion Desirability of centralization; Paris v. Regions Communists v. Socialists RPR v. Free Republic v. National Front
Third Parties Third parties rarely last
Electoral system- wasted votes Main parties absorb issues
Perot and budget deficits Nader and campaign finance reform?
Evolution of Parties Up until 1952, parties dominate
American politics Party workers mobilize voters Dominate citizen’s conceptions of
politics But are weakening in face of
progressive reforms
Demise of Parties Civil service reform Nonpartisan local elections,
reliance on “experts” The new “intelligent” and
“independent” voter Changes in technology
Rise of Consultants Polling – Al D’Amato Direct Mail fundraising TV advertising Change from politics dominated by
parties to one dominated by technology and consultants
Capital not labor intensive
Party Identification
- Democratic dominance gives way to Independents- More split-ticket voting and divided government
Who are the Partisans?
Democrats• Minorities esp. blacks• Least and most educated• Lowest income• Northeast• Single and female• Unionized• Jewish and nonreligious• Liberal
Republicans• White• Higher incomes• Married with children• South• Male• Protestant and religious• Conservative