Upload
dinhcong
View
234
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quantum Logic Spectroscopy and Precision Measurements
Quantum Logic Spectroscopy and Precision Measurements
Piet O. Schmidt
Bad Honnef, 4. November 2009
PTB Braunschweig and Leibniz Universität Hannover
OverviewOverview
• What is Quantum Metrology?
• Quantum Logic with Trapped Ions
• „Designer“ Atoms (Innsbruck)
• Heisenberg Limited Spectroscopy (NIST Boulder)
• Quantum Logic Optical Clock(NIST Boulder/PTB Braunschweig)
• Direct Frequency Comb Spectroscopy(PTB Braunschweig)
• Other systems?
What is Quantum Metrology?What is Quantum Metrology?
Beat standardquantum limitBeat standardquantum limit
Combineproperties of
similar/differentsystems
Combineproperties of
similar/differentsystems
SqueezingSqueezing Quantum LogicQuantum LogicEntanglementEntanglement
One of the first „real“ application of QIPOne of the first „real“ application of QIP
Quantum Metrology ApplicationsQuantum Metrology Applications
• Interferometry & gravitational wave detection
• Quantum imaging
• Phase & frequency measurements
• Designer atoms frequency & atomic properties
• Quantum Logic Spectroscopy:– precision spectroscopy
– optical clocks
Quantum Metrology ApplicationsQuantum Metrology Applications
• Interferometry & gravitational wave detection
• Quantum imaging
• Phase & frequency measurements
• Designer atoms frequency & atomic properties
• Quantum Logic Spectroscopy:– precision spectroscopy
– optical clocks
need efficient techniques to create entangled statesneed efficient techniques to create entangled states
Why Trapped Ions?Why Trapped Ions?• well isolated from environment
long coherence times
• coherent control of internal and external deg. of freedom
• high fidelity quantum computing toolbox available
• near 100% internal state detection efficiency
Quantum Logicwith Trapped IonsQuantum Logic
with Trapped Ions
RF
EC
CE
RF (radio frequency): V0cos(Ωtt)EC (end caps): +U0
CE (center electrodes): GND
Linear Ion TrapsLinear Ion Traps
3D harmonic trap
The Innsbruck Ion TrapThe Innsbruck Ion Trap
dion-electr ∼ 0.8 mmωz ∼ 1 MHzωr ∼ 3 MHz
Innsbruck
Ion BilliardIon Billiard
String of Mg+ ions in linear Paul trapBraunschweig
State detection using electron shelvingState detection using electron shelvingAux
detectionspectroscopy/coherent operations
time (s)
fluor
esce
nce
inte
nsity |↓i
|↑i
Innsbruck
continuous excitationcontinuous excitation
• observe quantum jumpsonline
State detection using electron shelvingState detection using electron shelvingAux
detection
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Zählrate pro 9 ms
D-Zustand besetzt S-Zustand besetzt
Anza
hl d
er M
essu
ngen
detection efficiency: >99.85%
|↑i state occupied |↓i state occupied
counts per 9 ms
# of
mea
sure
men
ts
Innsbruck
pulsed excitationpulsed excitation
• record number of detectedphotons per experimentand build histogramm
spectroscopy/coherent operations
spectroscopy: carrier and sidebands
Laser detuning
Quantized MotionQuantized Motion
BSB:Δn = 1
RSB:Δn = -1
CAR:Δn = 0
2-level-atom harmonic trap
.. .
n = 0 1 2
ω
excitation: various resonances
coupled system
.. ... .
......
coupled system
Γáω
Coherent State ManipulationCoherent State Manipulation
carriercarrier
sidebandsideband
time (µs)
time (µs)
Rabi frequencies:CAR:
BSB:
Lamb-Dickeparameter:
π-Pulse: |↓⟩ → |↑⟩
Innsbruck
Quantum LogicQuantum Logic• Idea by:
J. I. Cirac P. Zoller
Collective motion of ions describedby normal modes
4091
I2I2I2*
Creation of a Bell StateCreation of a Bell State
I1I1*I1*
n=0n=1
n=0n=1
I2I1
|↑i
I2I1 I2I1 I2I1
X
initial state BSB π/2 on Ion 1 RSB π on Ion 2 final state
|↓i1 |↓i2 |0i |↓i1 |↓i2 |0i+|↑i1 |↓i2 |1i
|↓i1 |↓i2 |0i+|↑i1 |↑i2 |0i
|↓i1 |↓i2 ±|↑i1 |↑i2 also:|↓i1 |↑i2 ±|↑i1 |↓i2
|↓i
Bell-State SpectroscopyBell-State Spectroscopy
1st Example:
Christian Roos, University of Innsbruck(Blatt group)
Time evolution of the Bell state |↓↑i−|↑↓iTime evolution of the Bell state |↓↑i−|↑↓i
ΔE
Let ion 1 and ion 2 havedifferent energy shifts:
time
Ene
rgy
Measurement of phase evolution rate
yields information about differential
energy shift !
Measurement of phase evolution rate
yields information about differential
energy shift !
C. F. Roos et al., Nature 443, 316 (2006)
Sources for ΔESources for ΔE• Magnetic Fields: Zeeman Shift
• Electric Field Gradient: Quadrupole Shift
Problem for ion-based optical clocksProblem for ion-based optical clocks
D5/2
P
S1/2
detection397 nm
729 nm
|↓i
|↑i
Electric Quadrupole ShiftElectric Quadrupole Shift
Electric quadrupole shift of the D5/2 level (j=5/2):
D5/2
S1/2
m = -5/2 -3/2 -1/2 1/2 3/2 5/2
+ +
InnsbruckC. F. Roos et al., Nature 443, 316 (2006)
Solution: “Designer Atoms”Solution: “Designer Atoms”Prepare the two-ion Bell state
D5/2m = -5/2 -3/2 -1/2 1/2 3/2 5/2
sensitive to quadrupole shift
10 Hz
C. F. Roos, quant-ph/0508148
insensitive to linear Zeeman shift
D5/2m = -5/2 -3/2 -1/2 1/2 3/2 5/2
5 MHz
Quadrupole shift measurement:Measure phase evolution as a function of time
Innsbruck
more generally: with m1+m2 = m3+m4
40Ca+ Quadrupole Shift Measurement40Ca+ Quadrupole Shift Measurement
oscillation frequency: Δ1 =(2π) 33.35(3) Hz
electric field gradient:
InnsbruckC. F. Roos et al., Nature 443, 316 (2006)
40Ca+ Quadrupole Measurement40Ca+ Quadrupole Measurement
Innsbruck
Quadrupole shift versus electric field gradient
(2nd order Zeeman effect)
C. F. Roos et al., Nature 443, 316 (2006)
Heisenberg Limited SpectroscopyHeisenberg Limited Spectroscopy
2nd Example:
Didi Leibfried, NIST Boulder(Wineland group)
Measurement LimitsMeasurement Limits• Classical: N independent measurements
uncertainty decreases as
• Heisenberg limit: ΔE Δt ∼ ~
Ene
rgy
Phase evolution:
N=1 N=2 N=3
uncertainty decreases as Boulder Innsbruck
Creating GHZ StatesCreating GHZ States
Encoding (Phase Gate)
Encoding (Phase Gate)
Decoding (Phase Gate)
N qubits
Boulder InnsbruckD. Leibfried et al., Science 304, 1476 (2004)
Heisenberg Limited SpectroscopyHeisenberg Limited Spectroscopy
Encoding (Phase Gate)
Decoding (Phase Gate)
N qubits
Boulder
InnsbruckD. Leibfried et al., Science 304, 1476 (2004)
Results with 3 QubitsResults with 3 Qubits
D. Leibfried et al., Science 304, 1476 (2004) Boulder
• 45 % better than perfect experiment with unentangled atoms
• method scalable to arbitrary number of qubits
Scaling up…Scaling up…
Contrast: 97%
Contrast: 84%
Contrast: 69%
Contrast: 52%
Contrast: 42%
D. Leibfried et al., Nature 438, 639 (2005)
0
S/N gain: 45%
S/N gain: 38%
S/N gain: 16%
S/N gain: 3%
BoulderNeed better gates!Need better gates!
The Aluminum Ion Optical Clock(NIST Boulder/PTB Braunschweig)
The Aluminum Ion Optical Clock(NIST Boulder/PTB Braunschweig)
3rd Example:
Principle of Optical ClocksPrinciple of Optical Clocks
Laser Oscillator
Single Ion
fs-comb
10:33am
State Detector
frequencyfeedback
500 THz
I(f)
ν0
Laser
Aluminum as Optical Clock ReferenceAluminum as Optical Clock Reference
•• Hans Hans DehmeltDehmelt 1992 (NP 1989)1992 (NP 1989)
•• AlAl++ Features:Features:– narrow optical transition
– no electric quadrupole shift
– small black-body shift
– But: no accessible cooling transition
1S0
3P0+
1P1
λ=167 nm (!) clock transitionλ = 267.43 nmΓ ≈ 2π×8 mHz
27Al+ (I=5/2) partial level scheme
Spectroscopy of 27Al+Spectroscopy of 27Al+
D.J. Wineland et. al.,Proc. 6th Symposium on FrequencyStandards and Metrology, 361 (2001)
Use additional ion (9Be+) and quantum logic for…
• sympathetic cooling
• internal state preparation
• internal state detection
n=0n=1
n=0n=1
Be+Al+|↓i
|↑i
Be+Al+ Be+Al+ Be+Al+
X
Be+Al+
X
initial state Al+ spectroscopy RSB transfer pulse RSB transfer pulse detection
Quantum Logic State TransferQuantum Logic State Transfer
Frequency Scan Time Scan
contrast ≈ 93% coherence ≈ 5 flops
1S0
3P1
27Al+
Be+
Al+
P.O. Schmidt et al., Science, 309, 749 (2005) Boulder
Single Pulse Rabi SpectroscopySingle Pulse Rabi Spectroscopy
Al+ Clock TransitionAl+ Clock Transition
T. Rosenband et al., PRL 98, 220801 (2007)
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
frequency detuning (Hz)
exci
tatio
npr
obab
ility
8.4 Hz
Boulder
Spectroscopy of 27Al+Spectroscopy of 27Al+
D.J. Wineland et. al.,Proc. 6th Symposium on FrequencyStandards and Metrology, 361 (2001)
Alternative approach:
⇒ use additional ion (9Be+) and quantum logic for…
• sympathetic cooling
• internal state preparation
• internal state detection
mF= -5/2 -3/2 -1/2 +1/2 +3/2 +5/2
Deterministic clock state preparationDeterministic clock state preparation
• probe mF=± 5/2 transitions to eliminate linear magnetic field shift
• conventional optical pumping is slow(≈ 20 s excited state lifetime!)
3P0
1S027Al+
Al CARπ-pulseπ-pol.
⇒ use Be+ assisted state preparation
SB coolingon Be+
(non reversible)
Al RSBπ-pulseσ−−pol.
Fieldindependent
1 kHz / gauss
Boulder
Applications in Ground StateCooling of Molecular Ions!
Applications in Ground StateCooling of Molecular Ions!
Spectroscopy of Zeeman Statesusing Deterministic PreparationSpectroscopy of Zeeman Statesusing Deterministic Preparation
1S0
3P1
27Al+mF= -5/2 -3/2 -1/2 +1/2 +3/2 +5/2-7/2 +7/2
P.O. Schmidt et al., Science, 309, 749 (2005)
Boulder
Al+ Laboratory @ NIST/BoulderAl+ Laboratory @ NIST/Boulder
February 2005
Principle of Optical ClocksPrinciple of Optical Clocks
Laser Oscillator
Single Ion
fs-comb
10:42am
State Detector
frequencyfeedback
500 THz
I(f)
Al+/Hg+ ComparisonAl+/Hg+ Comparison
T. Rosenband et al., Science 319, 1808 (2008)
First comparison of frequency standards
at the 17th digit
First comparison of frequency standards
at the 17th digit
μ-wave clock
SQL Al +100ms probe
Boulder
Al+: 2.3×10−17 systematic uncertainty
What does 10-17 mean?What does 10-17 mean?• 1:100,000,000,000,000,000
• 50x better than Cs fountain clocks
• 1 s deviation in 3 billion years
• 1st order Doppler shift: 3 nm/s or 300 μm/Jahr• Distance measurement earth-sun to 1/100 of the
diameter of a hair
150 million kilometer
100 μm
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 202010
-18
10-16
10-14
10-12
year
unce
rtain
ty
HHg+
Yb+Ca
Hg+
Sr
Sr
Al+@NISTHg+
Caesium
optical(neutral)
optical(ions)
History of Clock UncertaintiesHistory of Clock Uncertainties
courtesy: T. Rosenband, NIST
Al+@PTB
Sr+
goal
The Al+ Clock Project @ PTBThe Al+ Clock Project @ PTB
Goals:– more synergies with quantum logic
(e.g. entangled ions, new traps)– quantum sensors Geodesy– clocks in space?– tests of fundamental theories
Goals:– more synergies with quantum logic
(e.g. entangled ions, new traps)– quantum sensors Geodesy– clocks in space?– tests of fundamental theories
improved clock laser improved systematics
portabel
entangled ions
Clock ComparisonClock Comparison
|e2⟩
|g2⟩
α
|g1⟩hω1(α)
|e1⟩
hω2(α)
Does α change?Does α change?
α/α = (-1.6± 2.3)×10-17/yearα/α = (-1.6± 2.3)×10-17/year•
T. Rosenband et al., Science 319, 1808 (2008)
Direct Frequency Comb Spectroscopyusing Quantum Logic
Direct Frequency Comb Spectroscopyusing Quantum Logic
4th Example:
(PTB Braunschweig)
MotivationMotivation
Quasar absorption spectra suggest αmay have changed in cosmological time
More accurate laboratory spectra needed!
Physics beyond the Standard Model?
Goals: indirect, direct; me/mp in molecules, …Goals: indirect, direct; me/mp in molecules, …
Direct Frequency Comb SpectroscopyDirect Frequency Comb Spectroscopy
• frequency comb emits many colors• get complete level structure in one sweep• absolute frequency reference
can be used for many species
FrequencyComb Laser
also: Ye JILA/Boulder, Hollberg/Diddams NIST/Boulder, Eikema group Amsterdam, Hänsch MPQ and others
Ca+, Ti+, Fe+,…
Quantum Logic DetectionQuantum Logic Detection
spectroscopyion: Ca+
logic ion: 25Mg+
Red Sideband PulseState detection
Ions initially in motional ground state
StatusStatus
• First try:• Lamb-Dicke η ∼ 0.32• Limited by inefficient repumping
Raman laser driven Rabi oscillationsafter side-band cooling
F=2, mF=2
F=3, mF=2
Mg+
Quantum Logic SpectroscopyQuantum Logic Spectroscopy
• logic ion is a sensor for spectroscopy ion• spectroscopy ion controlled through logic ion• combine advantages of atomic species
universal technique
transfer state information
spectroscopyion
logic ion
Other Systems: NV Color CentersOther Systems: NV Color Centers
Jiang et al., Science 326, 267 (2009)
Other Systems: NV Color CentersOther Systems: NV Color Centers
Jiang et al., Science 326, 267 (2009)
Other Systems: CQED & MoleculesOther Systems: CQED & Molecules
André et al., Nat. Phys. 2, 636 (2006)
The Team @ PTBThe Team @ PTB
C. Bleuel, O. Mandel, I. Sherstov, D. NiggP.-C. Carstens, S. Ludwig, P. Schmidt, S. Klitzing, B. Hemmerling
Master & PhD
STARTProgram
€
SummarySummary
• Strong synergies betweenQIP and metrology:– Heisenberg limited spectroscopy
– „Designer“ Atoms
– Quantum Logic Optical Clock
– Direct Frequency Comb Spectroscopy
Quantum enhanced metrologyhas a bright future!
Quantum enhanced metrologyhas a bright future!