12
Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B., & Succi, C. (2003). Quality and management of eLearning in European universities. Retrived O ctober 17, 2006, from http://www.ticinoricerca.ch/papers/eista2003.pdf

Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2006/10/17CSL Lab ICE.NTNU 3 Quality Issue (1) The quality criteria used in the research –Done by the American HIEP, the Institute for Higher Education Policy, and published in 2000 –5 points Likert scale C1Institutional Support C2Course Development C3Teaching/ Learning C4Course Structure C5Student Support C6Faculty Support C7Evaluation and Assessment

Citation preview

Page 1: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

Quality and Management of eLearning in European

UniversitiesPresenter: Ching-ting Lin

Instructor: Ming-puu ChenCantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B., & Succi, C. (2003). Quality and management of eLearning in European universities. Retrived October 17, 2006, from http://www.ticinoricerca.ch/papers/eista2003.pdf

Page 2: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 2

Introduction

• Main purpose– How some European University have

integrated eLearning activities into their educational offer?

– How do they perceive the quality of their own eLearning initiatives?

• The 52 Universities in Switzerland and in the EU regions.

• Response ratio 60% (31/52)

Page 3: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 3

Quality Issue (1)

• The quality criteria used in the research – Done by the American HIEP, the Institute for Higher E

ducation Policy, and published in 2000– 5 points Likert scaleC1 Institutional SupportC2 Course DevelopmentC3 Teaching/ LearningC4 Course StructureC5 Student SupportC6 Faculty SupportC7 Evaluation and Assessment

Page 4: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 4

Quality Issue (2)

• Institutional Support (Cl) were perceived as the most present– showing that institutions are making significant efforts

to provide convenient infrastructures for performing eLearning activities in advantageous conditions

• Evaluation and Assessment (C7) is the less present

Page 5: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 5

Quality Benchmarks (1)

Page 6: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 6

Quality Benchmarks (2)

C1 Institutional Support

C3 Teaching/ Learning

C2 Course Development

C4 Course Structure

C6 Faculty Support

C5 Student Support

C7 Evaluation and Assessment

Page 7: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 7

Management Issue-the rationale for eLearning• Enhance the quality of teaching/learning

processes (87%)• Very few cases mentioned to economical

issues (13%)– Differently from many American institutions

• All the Swiss Universities don’t think new media as a mean to enlarge their educational market.

Page 8: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 8

Management Issue-Organization• These centers could be classified as

– service centers• test some tools and make them available to the tea

chers– development centers

• try to find and propose new learning solutions – didactical centers

• realize on themselves educational products, hiring competences and teachers from other university departments

Page 9: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 9

Management Issue-eLearning Activities• Almost all universities provide some (software) t

ools that the teacher could ask to use and to be trained and assisted in the utilization

• A group of institutions (11 out of 27) offer a space on a platform

• 27% of the institutions offer some courses completely online

• In few cases we find complete degree programs online, open also to non-residential students

Page 10: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 10

Toward a Taxonomy

• Distance Universities• Dual Mode Universities

– offering courses both for students on the campus and external students

• Campus Universities– introduce eLearning at very different levels,

ranging from the simple support to face-to-face teaching to the delivery of full on-line courses

Page 11: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

2006/10/17 CSL LabICE.NTNU 11

The five behavioral patterns of Universities

Page 12: Quality and Management of eLearning in European Universities Presenter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Cantoni, L., Inglese, T., Lepori, B.,

ENDAny advice is appreciated.