11
QI Proposal: Faculty Senate Discussion Deneese L. Jones, Provost Tom Delahunt, VP Admissions Keith Summerville, President - Faculty Senate January 30, 2013

QI Proposal: Faculty Senate Discussion

  • Upload
    lerato

  • View
    53

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

QI Proposal: Faculty Senate Discussion. Deneese L. Jones, Provost Tom Delahunt, VP Admissions Keith Summerville, President - Faculty Senate January 30, 2013. Higher Learning Commission A Commission of the North Central Association. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

QI Proposal: Faculty Senate Discussion

Deneese L. Jones, ProvostTom Delahunt, VP Admissions

Keith Summerville, President - Faculty Senate

January 30, 2013

Page 2: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Higher Learning CommissionA Commission of the North Central

Association The Higher Learning Commission expects that

institutions are always engaged in quality improvement.

The Open Pathway requires an institution to designate one major improvement effort it has undertaken as its Quality Initiative for reaffirmation of accreditation.

Commission encourages institutions to use the Quality Initiative to take risks, innovate, take on a tough challenge or pursue a yet unproven strategy.

Drake University Strategic Goal I, Objective D: “infuse global and multicultural understanding throughout Drake University”

Page 3: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Percentage Distribution of Public School Students in Pre-K through 12th Grade

White Black Hispanic Other0

1020304050607080

199020002010

Page 4: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Number of Public School Students Enrolled in Pre-K through 12th Grade

Page 5: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Hispanic Black Asian0

100200300400500600700800900

2009201020112012

Racial/Ethnic Diversity Applicants to Drake University 2009-2012

Page 6: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Fall 2011 Undergraduate and Pharm D Enrollment

6.4%

2.5% 1

.5% 0

.2%

4.2%

3.0%0.1%

80.8%

1.4%

Non-resHispanicTwo or moreAmerican IndianAsianBlackNative HIWhiteUnknown

Page 7: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Faculty by Race/Ethnicity

4.9% 2.1%2.8%

0.4%

83.4%

2.1% 2.5% 1.8%

2011 Faculty Racial Demographics

AsainAfrican American/ BlackHispanicNative Hawaiian/ Pac. Is-landerWhiteNon-Resident2 or more racesOther/ Unknown

Page 8: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

2011 EFR CohortAcademic Performance

by Race/Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity # StudentsAverage

GPA

Percent at or above

3.0Percent

Below 2.0American Indian 2      Asian 40 2.59 52.5% 17.5%

Black23

(1W) 2.3 20.8% 25.0%Hispanic 10 2.59 30.0% 20.0%Non-resident 26 2.87 61.5% 23.1%Two or more races 33 2.95 60.6% 9.1%Not Reported 10 3.19  White 667 3.12 65.8% 5.6%All EFR 811  3.05 62.9% 7.9%

Page 9: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

2010-2012 First Year Retention

America

n Ind

ianAsia

n

Africa

n Amer

ican

Inter

natio

nal

Hispan

ic

Middle

Easte

rn Reg

ion

Multira

cial

White/N

on-H

ispan

ic

Other

/No R

espo

nse

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%100.0%

87.6%

66.9%

91.7%

85.8%

100.0%

81.5%

87.4% 85.8%

2010-2012 Average Retention Rates- Race and Ethnicity

Page 10: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

“…Infuse global and multicultural understanding throughout Drake University”

QI Proposal: Achieving and Supporting Difference

Increase efforts to recruit and retain more students, faculty and staff from underrepresented groups

Intensify efforts to strengthen a campus environment that is welcoming and supportive of difference

Create greater understanding for addressing issues of difference for deepening and sustaining

intercultural learning

Create new curricula and organize co-curricular programming to enhance global and multicultural

understanding

Page 11: QI Proposal:  Faculty Senate Discussion

Questions for Consideration

What are the benefits?

What are the barriers that we can control?

Who are the constituents that should be included in the development of this QI plan?