Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HARTFORD | STAMFORD | WASHINGTON, DC | GREENWICH | LAKEVILLE
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015. All rights reserved.
Putting the “T” in Transparent: Bringing Transparency to Transgender
and Gender Identity Issues Linda L. Yoder
Peter J. Murphy
Melika S. Forbes
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
We will cover…• Transgender Discrimination Statistics
• Relevant Federal and State Law
� Recent/Pending Legislation
• Creating an Inclusive Environment: Issues to
Consider
� School context
� Employment context
• Best Practices
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Discrimination: K-12In a national survey, what % of students who
expressed a transgender identity or gender non-
conformity while in grades K-12 reported
harassment?
1 2 3 4
0% 0%0%0%
1. 6%
2. 12%
3. 35%
4. 78%
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Discrimination: Employment SettingIn a national survey, what % of employees who
expressed a transgender identity or gender non-
conformity reported an adverse job outcome such
as being fired, not hired or denied a promotion?
1 2 3 4
0% 0%0%0%
1. 26%
2. 47%
3. 71%
4. 90%
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
National Landscape: Federal Law Protection
• Gender-identity protection explicitly precluded
� Americans with Disabilities Act
� Federal Rehabilitation Act
• Some, but not uniform, gender-identity protection
recognized
� Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
� Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
• Prohibits employment discrimination on the bases of
race, color, national origin, sex and religion
� Protects against not only intentional discrimination, but
disparate impact discrimination resulting from facially
neutral policies
► Applicable to recruiting, hiring, advancement, harassment, hostile work
environment, segregation and classification of employees, compensation
and other employment terms, conditions and privileges and retaliation
� Enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (“EEOC”)
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Title IX of the Education Amendments
of 1972• Prohibits all forms of sex discrimination in schools, including:
� Gender-based harassment; sexual harassment; and sexual violence
� Affords:
► Right to equal treatment; equal access to athletic opportunities and benefits; right to access education free from sexual assault/violence; right to access education free from sexual and gender-based harassment
� Enforced by the U.S. Department of Education
(“USDOE”)
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Complaints of Harassment and Title IX
• USDOE recently took the position that Title IX
protects transgender and gender non-conforming
students
• Peer on peer harassment
� Actionable against schools and districts if1) harassment “severe, pervasive and objectively offensive”
2) acts of harassment occurred in situation under the direct control of school officials
3) school officials had actual knowledge, but were “deliberately indifferent”
4) causal relationship between deliberate indifference and injury suffered
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Federal Law: Historical Developments
1989
• U.S. Supreme Court found that an employee could pursue a claim under Title VII for sex discrimination for failing to conform to gender stereotypes. See Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
2006
• U.S. Department of Justice (“USDOJ”) takes the position in litigation that Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination does not per se cover discrimination based on gender identity or transgender status. See Schroer v. Billington,, 577 F. Supp. 2d 293 (D.D.C. 2008).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Federal Law: Historical Developments
2000s
• Various circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals found that the definition of “sex” under federal non-discrimination laws encompasses both biological differences and failure to “conform to socially prescribed gender expectations.” See e.g., Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2000); Rosa v. Park West Bank & Trust Co., 214 F.3d 213 (1st Cir. 2000); Smith v. City of Salem, 378 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2004); Glenn v. Bromby, 663 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011).
• However, some courts simultaneously rejected extending protections under Title VII to transgender persons. See e.g., Etsitty v. Utah Transit Auth., 502 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2005).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Federal Law: Recent Developments
2011
• Office of Personnel Management announces federal government’s policy to provide a workplace free of discrimination based on gender identity. See http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/diversity-and-inclusion/reference-materials/gender-identity-guidance/
2012
• EEOC ruled that discrimination on the basis of gender identity is sex discrimination. See Macy v. Holder, Appeal No. 0120120821 (EEOC, April 20, 2012).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Federal Law: Recent Developments
2013
• Employment Non-Discrimination Act (“ENDA”)—proposed legislation that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment based on sexual orientation and gender identity—passes 64-32 in the Senate and is awaiting vote in the House.
2014
• President Obama issues executive order prohibiting gender identity discrimination in federal employment and government contracting. See Exec. Order No. 13,672, 79 Fed. Reg. 42,971 (2014).
• USDOJ reverses its prior position and “determine[s] that the best reading of Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination is that it encompasses discrimination based on gender identity, including transgender status.” See Memorandum, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-holder-directs-department-include-gender-identity-under-sex-discrimination (2014).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
National Landscape: State Law Protection
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Connecticut Law: Developments
1991
• Connecticut passes comprehensive anti-discrimination law concerning sexual orientation in employment, housing, public accommodations and credit. See Public Act No. 91-58, § 3 (1991).
2000
• Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (“CHRO”) issues declaratory ruling that the state’s sex discrimination laws provide protections for transsexual individuals. See http://www.ct.gov/chro/cwp/view.asp?a=2526&Q=315942
2011
• “Gender identity and expression” added to state anti-discrimination laws. See Public Act No. 11-55 (2011).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Connecticut Law (effective as of October 1, 2011)
• Public Act No. 11-55
� Added “gender identity and expression” to the state’s anti-
discrimination laws
� Protects against discrimination in employment, education,
housing, public accommodations and in any other areas in
which sex discrimination is prohibited
� Authorizes persons to file complaints with CHRO
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Definitions
• “Gender Identity or expression” means…� “a person's gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or
not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different
from that traditionally associated with the person's physiology or
assigned sex at birth, which gender-related identity can be shown by
providing evidence including, but not limited to, medical history, care
or treatment of the gender-related identity, consistent and uniform
assertion of the gender-related identity or any other evidence that the
gender-related identity is sincerely held, part of a person's core identity
or not being asserted for an improper purpose.” See Conn. Gen. Stat. §
46a-51(21).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Definitions
• “Public accommodations” means
� “any establishment which caters or offers its services
or facilities or goods to the general public…”
� Connecticut public schools and higher education
systems are considered places of public
accommodations, however, distinct laws were passed
to prohibit gender identity and expression
discrimination in these areas
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Establishing Gender Identity
• Non-exhaustive list:
� Medical history
� Care and treatment of gender-related identity
� Non-medical:
► Consistent and uniform assertion of a gender identity
► Any other evidence that gender identity is sincerely held
or part of a person’s core identity and is not being
asserted for an improper purpose
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Is the state law applicable to every
employer/employee in Connecticut?• No, there are several exemptions/exceptions:
� Employers with 2 or less employees
� Employers with positions with a “bona fide occupational qualification” for a
non-transgendered person
� Religious corporations, entities, associations and societies regarding 1) whom
they employ to perform work or 2) with respect to matters of discipline, faith,
internal organization or ecclesiastical rules, customs or laws established by
such organizations
� Employees employed by their spouse, children or parent or those in domestic
service
� Reserve Officer Training Program (“ROTC”) programs
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Is the state law applicable to every
school in Connecticut?
• No, there are several exemptions/exceptions:
� Religious educational institutions
� Private schools
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Creating A Non-discriminatory
Environment: Issues to Consider
• Name/Gender-markers changes
• Use of appropriate names and pronouns
• Bathroom and locker rooms
• Confidentiality and privacy
• Dress codes
• Dignity and respect
• Unconscious bias
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
SCHOOL CONTEXT
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Consider…• A school district required a 7th grade student who
presented as male and completed a court-ordered name
change to use the nurse’s office for restroom and to
change in and out of his gym clothes. Also, on an
overnight field trip, the school assigned the student to
the female cabin initially, but after protests from the
student’s family assigned him to one by himself (and
his father as a chaperone).
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Does this constitute gender identity
and expression discrimination?
1 2 3
0% 0%0%
1. Yes
2. No
3. It depends
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Student v. Arcadia Unified School District, DoJ Case
No. DJ 169-12C-70, OCR Case No. 09-12-1020 (2013)
• OCR and the DoJ thought so…
� Violation of Title IX
� Resolution agreement negotiated
► School district must treat student as “male” and stop singling
him out from other males
► District must revise policies to state transgender and gender
non-conforming students are entitled to equal access and
conduct district-wide training with personnel and students
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Creating a non-discriminatory
learning environment
• Connecticut Safe School Coalition drafted guidelines
for Connecticut schools to comply with the gender
identity and expression non-discrimination laws
� Adopted by CHRO
� Makes clear that law is applicable to not only
students, but to parents/guardians and school
employees
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
CHRO’s Guidance Recommendations
• Use student’s chosen name and gender marker
consistent with gender identity, as affirmed by
parent/guardian, on all records
� Court-ordered name change not required
� Consider storing prior records in a separate
confidential file
� Parents may request retroactive amendment of all
records under FERPA
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
CHRO’s Guidance Recommendations
• Use pronoun consistent with student’s gender identity
• Students should have access to bathrooms and locker
rooms consistent with his/her gender identity� Sensitivity of other students or their parents is not an overriding
consideration
� However, if a student or administrator feels there is a safety or privacy
concern and it is in the best interest of the student, a student—
transgender or non-transgender—may be provided access to a non-
stigmatizing alternative such as a single-stall “unisex” bathroom or
private area in the locker room
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
• Permit participation in sex-segregated activity based on
asserted gender identity
� Try to eliminate gender-sorting
� Consider free-choice play areas
• Permit dress based on asserted gender identity
� Consider rewording dress code to make gender-neutral
• Try to not show anxiety or discomfort with a student’s (or
parent/guardian’s) gender fluidity
CHRO’s Guidance Recommendations
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Athletic Competitions
• Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference
(“CIAC”) advises students who wish to participate in
gender specific sports based on their gender identity
to address the issue with their local school district
� CIAC defers to the determination of the school
district regarding gender identity
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Consider…
• A funeral home director, biologically male, worked for
her employer for six years and had a satisfactory job
performance evaluation. She informed her employer
that she intended to undergo surgery to transition to a
woman and would soon present as a woman. Two
weeks later, the employer terminated the director and
allegedly called her plans “unacceptable.”
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Does this constitute discrimination?
1 2 3
0% 0%0%
1. Yes
2. No
3. It depends
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
EEOC v. R.G. & G.R Harris Funeral Homes
• Case currently pending in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan (Case No. 2:14-cv-
13710)
� One of two cases filed by the EEOC alleging sex
discrimination based on transgender status
► Other case: EEOC v. Lakeland Eye Clinic � same facts
except discharge came after employee, biologically
male, began presenting as a woman
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Consider…
• An employee, biologically male, decides to openly present as a
woman. Her supervisor allegedly refers to her by her birth
name and with masculine pronouns after notification that she
legally changed her name as well as questioned her fitness to
perform the job. The employee was allegedly also instructed
to remove her earrings and was disciplined for wearing a wig.
Some of the employee’s colleagues discussed her medical and
sexual history.
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Does this constitute discrimination?
1 2 3
0% 0%0%
1. Yes
2. No
3. It depends
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Is it a hostile work environment?
1 2 3
0% 0%0%
1. Yes
2. No
3. It depends
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Outcome to be determined…
• Case currently pending before CHRO
� However, based on news reports, we know that
the…
► Employee was discharged after being placed on
administrative leave and exhausting vacation and sick
days
► Employer, a public entity, stated discharge was “an
administrative—not a disciplinary—separation.”
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Creating a non-discriminatory work
environment• Permit employee use of bathroom corresponding to
gender identity
• Recognize self-identity, regardless of gender
reassignment surgery or documentation
� Use preferred name and corresponding pronoun
� If unsure, ask in private
� Change personnel records upon request
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Creating a non-discriminatory work
environment• Institute gender-neutral dress codes
• Permit dress in accordance with gender identity
• Recognize and address contributing factors to a hostile
work environment
� E.g.: asking of excessively personal questions,
discussing transgender employee’s status or medical
history, refusal to use or learn preferred name or
corresponding pronoun
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Creating a non-discriminatory work
environment
• Ensure that health insurance policies are transgender-
inclusive
• Maintain confidentiality
• Prohibit inquiries into an employee or applicant’s
sex, gender or surgical history
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Best Practices• Design, disseminate and apply consistently written
non-discriminatory policies
� Especially in areas where transgendered people have high
vulnerability to discrimination such as bathrooms, dress
codes, harassment and hostile work environments
• Provide information, training and educational
opportunities
• Biases of others are not a valid reason for
discrimination
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Best Practices
• Promptly and thoroughly investigate claims of
gender-identity and expression discrimination
� Periodically conduct self-assessment
� Take complaints of harassment seriously
• Respect privacy
� Do not ask about medical history
� Do not “out” transgender people to others
www.shipmangoodwin.com © Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2015
Questions