Click here to load reader
Upload
alessio-caciagli
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 1/6
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Meas. Sci. Technol. 15 (2004) 365–370 PII: S0957-0233(04)65307-0
Circular magnetization and susceptibilityof an ideal soft ferromagnetic wire
D-X Chen1, A Hernando2 and L Pascual2
1 ICREA and Grup d’Electromagnetisme, Departament de Fısica, Universitat Autonoma
Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain2 Instituto Magnetismo Aplicado, UCM-RENFE-CSIC, PO Box 155, 28230 Las Rozas,
Madrid, Spain
Received 20 June 2003, in final form 20 October 2003, accepted forpublication 26 November 2003Published 11 December 2003Online at stacks.iop.org/MST/15/365 (DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/15/2/008)
AbstractThe voltage induced by an alternating current is derived for an idealferromagnetic cylinder with a linear local magnetization curve ending by asudden saturation, based on which practical formulae relevant to inductivemeasurements of the circular hysteresis loop and the susceptibility of softmagnetic wires are recommended. The anomalously large circularsusceptibility discovered in amorphous soft magnetic wires is furtherstudied using the present results.
Keywords: circular susceptibility, circular magnetization, soft magnetic wire,inductive magnetic measurement
1. Introduction
When an alternating current flows through a conducting wire,
it produces a circular ac field inside the wire based on theAmpere law so that the wire is magnetized in the circular
direction. According to the Faraday law, the circular acflux corresponding to the circular field and magnetizationwill induce emf surrounding its circular path so that an
induced ac voltage can be measured along the wire and theac magnetization obtained. This is the basic principle behind
the inductive measurement of the circular magnetic propertiesof conducting magnetic wires.
Although the relation between the ac impedance Z and
the constant circular susceptibility χc of a conducting cylinderwas rigorously derived many years ago [1, 2], considerable
attention has only been recently devoted to techniques forcircular magnetic measurements after possible applicationsof the magneto-inductive effect of soft magnetic wires were
predicted [3]. For example, in studies of nearly non-magnetostrictive amorphous wires, circular hysteresis loops
were measured in [4–6] using a technique proposed in [7].However, there has been a major complexity that discouragesthe use of such a kind of technique; the circular field produced
by the alternating current is nonuniform and it is difficult togive correct average values of the field and magnetization.Althoughconsiderableefforthas been applied to thederivation
of the relation between the circular magnetization and induced
voltage [4, 7], most experimentalists still regard circularmagnetic measurements as qualitative or relative ones innature,since the mentionedderivationswere based on intuitiveor less sound grounds. In this work, we will give a rigorousderivationof theac voltage induced by thetransportalternating
current for a simple model that characterizes the main featuresof ferromagnetshaving a linear local magnetization curvewitha sudden saturation, following the approach proposed in [8].As a result, we will provide experimentalists with simple andoptimized formulae to use in measurements of the circular
hysteresis loop and susceptibility. A sister paper studying aferromagnetic strip has recently been published [9].
Impedance measurements are often easier than ordinary
inductive magnetic measurements, since the former involveonly the current and voltage of the sample itself butfor the latter separate magnetization and pick-up coilsare necessary. With the formulae derived in this work,we can unambiguously obtain circular magnetic properties
from impedance measurements, which are an importantcomplement of longitudinal properties measured by ordinarymagnetic measurements. As a result, the basic magnetic
properties, magnetization process and magnetic structureof ferromagnetic wires can be studied by measuring their
impedance as a function of current amplitude and frequency,temperature, tension, twist and so on. Such areas of researchare especially convenient and useful for experimentalists whoare studying magneto-impedance, since they already have all
0957-0233/04/020365+06$30.00 © 2004 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK 365
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 2/6
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 3/6
Circular magnetization and susceptibility of an ideal soft ferromagnetic wire
Figure 1. Comparison between the averaged and local (a) M c/ M c,s
versus H c/ H c,s, (b) M c,m,1/ M c,s versus H c,m/ H c,s, and (c) χc,1/χc
versus H c,m/ H c,s for an ideal ferromagnetic cylinder having a localcircular magnetization curve as denoted by the dashed line in (a).
where
C 2 = 3/4. (22)
Comparing with the above derivation, it can be found thatmany results appearing in [4, 7] are correct and this work puts
them on a sound physical basis.
The averaged and local magnetization curves are plotted
in figure 1(a).
2.4. Fundamental circular susceptibility
With the lock-in technique, induced voltage is measured as
its fundamental component V ind,1(r 0, t ), so that fundamental
circular susceptibility isdetermined. It is identical to V ind(r 0, t )
when hm < 0, but when hm 0, Fourier analysis on
equations (11) and (16) is necessary. This analysis results
in the fundamental induced voltage
V ind,1(r 0, t ) = r 20
2 AB cos ωt , (23)
where
B = 1
π[2 arcsinh−1
m + sin(2 arcsinh−1m )]
+ 4
3πcos arcsin h−1
m (h−1m − h−3
m ). (24)
From equations (11) and (23) we see that the rms value of the
fundamental voltage
V ind,1 =√
2a2 A/4 (hm < 1), (25)
V ind,1 =√
2a2 AB/4 (hm 1). (26)
Since at low I , the fundamental inductance
L1 = V ind,1/ω I = µ0lχc/8π, (27)
we define the averaged fundamental circular susceptibility
χavc,1 = 8π L1/µ0l, (28)
and thus,
χ avc,1 = χc (hm < 1), (29)
χ avc,1 = χc B (hm 1). (30)
2.5. The fundamental circular magnetization curve
Consistent with equations(21),(22), (29)and (30)the averaged
fundamentalcircularmagnetization curve, M avc,m,1 versus H av
c,m,
may be calculated using
H avc,m = 3 H c,m(r 0)/4, (31)
M avc,m,1
=χ av
c,1 H avc,m. (32)
It coincides at low and high fields with the local fundamental
circular magnetization curve as obtained from equations (4)
and (5) by Fourier analysis:
M locc,m,1
M c,s
= 2
π
H loc
c,m
H c,s
arcsin H c,s
H locc,m
+ cosarcsin H c,s
H locc,m
. (33)
Thus, we have the normalized averagedand local M c,m,1/ M c,s,
M avc,m,1/ M c,s = M loc
c,m,1/ M c,s = 4/π ≈ 1.273 at saturation.
A comparison between both is shown in figure 1(b).
Correspondingly, χ avc,1 as a function of H av
c,m is also consistent
with the local one,
χ locc,1 = M loc
c,m,1/ H locc,m, (34)
as seen in figure 1(c).
3. Circular magnetic measurements for wires
3.1. Formulae for circular magnetic measurements
Since the circular demagnetizing factor is zero, a wire can be a
standardsample shapefor circular softmagneticmeasurements
just as a ring for longitudinal soft magnetic measurements.
Another advantageof such circular measurements is that there
is no need to wind the magnetizing and search coils, since the
magnetizing field is produced by a current flowing through the
wire itself and the induced voltage is detected on the surface
of the wire itself.
367
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 4/6
D-X Chen et al
Consistent with the above results, the averaged hysteresis
loop of the magnetic wires should be calculated using
H avc (t ) = 3 I (t )/8πr 0, (35)
M avc (t ) − M av
c (0) = 3
µ0lr 0
t
0
V ind(r 0, t ) dt , (36)
if thewaveforms of transportcurrent, I (t ), andinduced voltage
across l lengthof thewire, V ind(r 0, t ), arerecorded. It shouldbe
noted that when measuring V ind(r 0, t ), the contribution of the
voltage dropped on the dc resistance and the voltage induced
by the magnetic field has to be removed using, for example, a
bridge technique [4, 7].
The averaged fundamental circular susceptibility χ avc,1
and the amplitudes of the averaged fundamental field and
magnetization corresponding to this χ avc,1 should be calculated
using
χavc,1 =
8π L1
µ0l= 8π V ind,1
µ0lω I 1, (37)
H avc,m,1 = 3
√ 2 I 1/16πr 0, (38)
M avc,m,1 = χ av
c,1 H avc,m,1, (39)
if the rms values of the fundamental current and induced
voltage, I 1 and V ind,1, are measured. Equation (37)hasalready
been given in [8]. From equation (37) we see that χ avc,1 is very
easy to measure for magnetic wires; not requiring the value of
radius, χ avc,1 can be measured easily and accurately by a lock-in
techniqueeven for wires with micro size, and only a correction
with respect to external inductance is necessary [10, 12].
3.2. Measuring frequency
It should be emphasized that all the above derivations are
performed at so low a frequency that equation (3) holds. For
higher frequencies, eddy-current effects will make χc,1 take
a complex value, and the study of its frequency dependence
will be interesting for understanding the domain structure and
magnetization process as discussed in [8].
Defining a reduced frequency
θ 2 = r 20 µ0χcω/ρ = 2r 20 /δ2s , (40)
where ρ and δs are in turn the resistivity and the classical
skin depth of the wire, we have the eddy-current loss factor
in the classical case and when considering the transverse wall
displacements of large domains,
tan δclaseddy = θ 2/24, (41)
tan δeddy = (4.4c/r 0) tan δclaseddy, (42)
respectively, where 2c is the averaged circular domain
width [8]. Since low frequencies require tan δeddy 1, we
may use the criterion of θ = 1 to estimate the classical
upper-limit frequency f max ≈ 400 Hz, if typical values of
ρ = 1.3× 10−6 m, r 0 = 60 µm and χc = 105 are assumed.
When considering the possible contribution of domain wall
displacements to the circular magnetization process, this f max
can be reduced in proportion to r 0/c.
In equations (37)–(39) we use subscript 1 not only for χ
and M but also H and I which stands for the fundamental
component, because the latter are not required to be modelled
sinusoidally in real measurements. However, using an ac
power supply with sinusoidal output, the sinusoidal condition
for I (t ) has already been met when the low-frequency
requirement is met, since when tan δeddy is small the possible
harmonic reactance is always much smaller than the total
constant resistance of the measuring circuit so that I (t ) isproportional to thesinusoidal outputemfof thepowdersupply.
Nevertheless, the situation is more complex if the frequency is
high.
3.3. Upper limit of the circular field
There is an upper limit of the circular field on the order of a
few 102 A m−1, above which the sample temperaturemay rise
considerably. Therefore, such measurements are especially
suited to very soft ferromagnets. However, this upper limit
canbe greatly increasedif themeasuringcircuit is immersed in
non-conducting liquidor themeasurements arecarriedoutvery
quickly to reduce the temperature rise caused by the heatingof the transport current.
4. Parasitic circular soft ferromagnetism
Being the variation of the ac impedance Z with the axial
dc field H z, the magnetoimpedance (MI) of ferromagnetic
wires and ribbons has become a topic of interest in recent
years. Since MI is determined by the skin effect and the H zdependent circular susceptibility, very soft magnetic wires are
thebest candidates to show a giant MI. Therefore, studying the
impedance of wires [13], we have proposed a formula for the
circular susceptibility of an ideal soft magnetic wire,
χc,ideal = M s/| H z|, (43)
which should be valid for | M s H z| |K eff |, K eff denoting the
effective anisotropy constant in the wire.
However, the measured χ avc,1 of very soft nearly non-
magnetostrictive amorphous or nanocrystalline wires has been
found to be many times greater than χc,ideal at certain values of
H z [10, 11, 14, 15], and this anomalous phenomenon has been
explained by theexistenceof magnetic inclusions embeddedin
a soft magnetic matrix and the formation of exchange-coupled
disc-like soft magnetic structures [15]. Using the formulae
given above to analyse some experimental data, we can showa new feature of this phenomenon, which is the occurrence of
a parasitic circular soft ferromagnetism.
The studied sample was an in-rotating-water quenched,
nearly non-magnetostrictive amorphous CoFeSiB wire of
diameter 0.14 mm and length 15 cm after 475 ◦C annealing
for 30 min, which was actually sample S1 presented in [15].
Low-frequency fundamental inductance L1 was measured by
the lock-in technique for a middle segment of l = 6 cm [15].
The measurement set-up is simple, as shown in figure 2.
The output of the internal oscillator of the lock-in amplifier
provides alternating current to the series connection of a
standard resistor Rs and the middle segment of the sample S,
which is placed east–west in a magnetizing solenoid fedby a dc power supply. At a given alternating current and
dc field H z, the voltages across the resistor and across the
connection of the resistor and the sample are measured by
368
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 5/6
Circular magnetization and susceptibility of an ideal soft ferromagnetic wire
Figure 2. Schematic of the set-up used for circular magneticmeasurements using a lock-in amplifier.
Figure 3. The circular susceptibility χavc,1 of a nearly
non-magnetostrictive CoFeSiB amorphous wire measured at H z = ±1430, ±4470 and ±14 300 A m−1 as a function of H c,m .Dashed curves are the fits by χ av∗
c,1 calculated using equations (24),(29), (30), (43) and (44).
the lock-in amplifier as V 11 and V 21 + jV 22, respectively. The
fundamental alternating current and the inductance across the
middle segment of the sample are calculated by I 1 = V 11/ Rs
and L 1 = RsV 22/ωV 11. The circular susceptibility χ avc,1 was
calculated using equation (28). As explained in [15], by
decreasing H z from 9 × 104 to −9 × 104 A m−1, we have
over a large range of 10 A m−1 <
| H z
|< 104 A m−1 that
(i) χ avc,1( H z = H z1 > 0) > χ av
c,1( H z = − H z1),
(ii) χ avc,1( H z) measured at low H c,m is appreciably greater than
χc,ideal( H z), and
(iii) χ avc,1 measured at a fixed H z decreases with increasing
H c,m(r 0).
It should be emphasized that χ avc,1/χc,ideal can be as large as 55
at H z ≈ 1400 A m−1 and H c,m(r 0) = 2.3 A m−1.
We now showin figure3 the variation of the measured χ avc,1
asa functionof H c,m(r 0) when H z isdecreased to14300,4470,
1430, −1430,−4470, and −14 300 A m−1, respectively. We
see that feature (iii) occurs for all cases except at the largest
| H z|, where χ avc,1 remains constant.Feature (iii) indicates that the circular magnetization
obeys a general rule in ferromagnetism; it has a high initial
susceptibility χc and a saturation magnetization M c,s. We
model the local circular magnetization as above, so that
χavc,1[ H c,m(r 0)] can be calculated using equations (24), (29)
and (30). Assuming the total χ av∗c,1 to be the sum of this
susceptibility and χc,ideal, we use
χav∗c,1 [ H z, H c,m(r 0)] = χ av
c,1[ H c,m(r 0)] + χc,ideal( H z) (44)
to fit the measured χ avc,1[ H z, H c,m(r 0)]. The results are shownin figure 3 by dashed curves. In the fitting, parameters χc and
H c,s are chosenas 18000and 2.7 A m−1, 7800and 4.7 A m−1,
3100 and 3.5 A m−1, and 440 and 14 A m−1 for H z = 1430,
−1430, 4470 and −4470 A m−1, respectively.
We see that the model fits are generally good. There
are two kinds of departure of the fitting curve from the
experimental data: its turning down is too sharp for three
cases with lower χc and it is too high at the maximum value of
H c,m(r 0) for two cases with higher χc. The former is obviously
due to the simplification in the model with only two constant
valuesofd M c/d H c andthe lattermay indicate that χc is smaller
at the axial region of a few micrometres diameter.The good fits imply that the difference between χ avc,1 and
χc,ideal results froma very soft circular ferromagnetism, whose
M c,s decreases with increasing | H z|, being greater at H z > 0
than at H z < 0, like the situation of χc itself. Normalized to
M s, we have M c,s/ M s = 0.085, 0.064, 0.019 and 0.011 for
the above four cases. Since this soft circular ferromagnetism
is parasitized upon an ordinary ferromagnet that has a large
saturation magnetization M s and very small longitudinal and
circular differential susceptibilities (at sufficiently high H z),
and it is not predicted by the conventional theory of domain
magnetization rotations and domain wall displacements, we
name it parasitic circular soft ferromagnetism.
If the saturation magnetization for the parasiticferromagnetism is M s, then the ratio M c,s/ M s should be the
volume fraction occupied by the parasitic ferromagnetism.
This will lead to a very large low-field circular susceptibility
for theparasitic ferromagnetism itself, being 5×104 ∼ 2×105
calculated from this ratio and themeasured χavc,1 = 600–18 000
for the four upper curves in figure3. Such a high susceptibility
cannot be shown if the parasitic ferromagnetism occurswithin
separatedparticlesonly, since the strongdemagnetizing effects
will make the total circular susceptibility very small. For
example, the shape susceptibility of an isolate sphere, which
is determined by demagnetizing effects and sets the upper
limit of the external susceptibility of a ferromagnetic sphere,is merely 3. Therefore, it must occur in a dispersive and
multiconnectedway having thesame entire volumeas the wire
andan averagedsaturation magnetization M c,s. In other words,
thereis a sponge-likeparasitic ferromagnetismcoexistingwith
the ordinary ferromagnetic matrix.
We have used the above-derived formulae to research a
particular topic. Since the phenomenon discovered is new,
interesting and complex, its study is still in progress, and
therefore no definite explanations can be given at present.
However, it is necessary and possible to give a brief review
regarding this phenomenon, since the existing presentation in
the literature is not so logical owing to the absence of one of
the key papers, which has only been published very recentlyafter a long delay [16]. We noticed the anomalous, over-
large circular susceptibility in nearly non-magnetostrictive
amorphous wires after calculating the magnetoimpedance of
369
8/13/2019 Publi Journal P 11479
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/publi-journal-p-11479 6/6
D-X Chen et al
ferromagnetic wires in 1998 [13], where equation (43) was
presented. Since the anomaly occurred at H z much greater
than the coercive force, it should belong to the problem of
the approach to saturation. In contrast to classical studies
which emphasized the longitudinal magnetization, transverse
magnetization had to be calculated using the Stoner–Wahlfarth
model in various cases. Doing this [13], we confirmed thatthe phenomenon could not be explained by classical technical
magnetization theories, as later stated briefly in [17], and
consequently submitted two papers to announce this fact,
including its asymmetry [10, 11]. Since it was intimately
connected to another phenomenon, the hysteresis loop shift
in annealed amorphous ferromagnetic wires, another paper
was written in the same period [18]. Trying to further
explain the phenomenon, a more detailed study was published
in [15], where a model of micro magnetic structures centred at
magnetic inclusions was proposed. According to this model,
in the wire there are intrinsic and annealing-induced soft
and hard magnetic inclusions embedded in the soft magnetic
matrix; when the spontaneous magnetization of the inclusionsis greater than that of the matrix pointing in the same axial
direction, exchange-coupleddisc-like soft magnetic structures
formand they may hugelyenhance the circular magnetization.
The soft magnetic matrix condition was also justified in an
extended study on nanocrystalline wires; when the magnetic
softness of an amorphous wire was greatly improved by
nanocrystallization, its circular susceptibility changed from
the classical one into the anomalously enhanced one [14]. The
essentialdifferencebetweenanomalouscircularmagnetization
and the classical one was shown in a new way by comparing
the circular susceptibility calculated from the inductance
with that calculated from the second harmonical longitudinalmagnetization [19]. In this work, the modelled soft magnetic
structures are further characterized as a sponge-like parasitic
ferromagnetism.
5. Conclusion
We have performed a rigorous derivation of the alternating
current induced voltage across an ideal soft ferromagnetic
cylinder, which has a local linear magnetization curve with
a sudden saturation. Being consistent with their local
values, the optimum averaged circular field, magnetization
and susceptibility are recommended to be calculated using
equations (35)–(39) in the inductive measurements of soft
magnetic wires. Based on this work, circular magnetic
measurement techniques may be further developed and
standardized to become a powerful tool in materials research.An example is given for the applications of some derived
formulae in materials research.
References
[1] Bozorth R M 1951 Ferromagnetism (New York:Van Nostrand-Reinhold) p 776
[2] Landau L D, Lifshitz E M and Pitaevskii L P 1995 Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Boston, MA:Butterworth-Heinemann) p 210
[3] Mohri K, Kohzawa T, Kawashima K, Yoshida H andPanina L V 1992 IEEE Trans. Magn. 28 3150
[4] Kraus L, Vazquez M and Hernando A 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76
5343[5] Velazquez J, Vazquez M, Chen D-X and Hernando A 1994
Phys. Rev. B 50 16737[6] Freijo J J, Hernando A and Vazquez M 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett.
74 1305[7] Hernando A and Barandiaran J M 1978 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
11 1539[8] Chen D-X and Munoz J L 1999 IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 1906[9] Chen D-X and Hernando A 2002 Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 946
[10] Chen D-X, Pascual L and Li Y-F 2000 J. Magn. Magn. Mater.218 L5
[11] Chen D-X, Pascual L, Castano F J, Hernando A andVazquez M 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 111
[12] Li Y-F, Chen D-X, Pascual L, Vazquez M andHernando A 2001 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 237 17
[13] Chen D-X, Munoz J L, Hernando A and Vazquez M 1998Phys. Rev. B 57 10699
[14] Li Y-F, Chen D-X, Vazquez M and Hernando A 2002 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 241 179
[15] Chen D-X and Pascual L 2002 Phil. Mag. 82 1315[16] Chen D-X and Pascual L 2003 IEEE Trans. Magn. 39 510[17] Chen D-X, Pascual L and Hernando A 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett.
77 1727[18] Chen D-X, Li Y-F, Pascual L, Vazquez M and
Hernando A 2000 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 212 373[19] Chen D-X and Pascual L 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 6195
370