28
PEMBINA MARINE TERMINALS INC. PEMBINA PORTLAND PROPANE TERMINAL PSC Work Session – March 17, 2015

PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pembina Pipeline Corporations quality analysis for its $500M portland propane project.

Citation preview

Page 1: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION PEMBINA MARINE TERMINALS INC.

PEMBINA PORTLAND PROPANE TERMINAL

PSC Work Session – March 17, 2015

Page 2: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

INTRODUCTIONS

2

Pembina Representatives:

•  Harry Andersen, Vice President, Legal and General

Counsel

•  Stu Taylor, Senior Vice President, NGL Facilities

•  Eric Dyck, Vice President, Marine Terminals

Page 3: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

3

•  Introductions

•  End Uses of Propane

•  Facility Safety Features

•  Quantitative Risk Assessment Process

•  Conclusion

•  Questions

Page 4: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

China  has  displaced  burning  solid  biofuels  in  res/comm  sector  over  7me  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

China  Res/Comm  Demand  by  Fuel  

Geothermal,  solar   Natural  Gas  Refined  Products  (incl.  propane)   Coal  Biofuels  and  waste  

Solid  biofuel  is  being  displaced  by  refined  products  (including  propane)  and  natural  gas  in  the  res/comm  sector  in  China  

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

Million  tonn

es  of  o

il  eq

uivalent  (M

Mtoe)  

China  Res/Comm  Demand  by  Fuel  (excluding  biofuels  and  waste)  

Coal   Refined  Products  (incl.  propane)  

Natural  Gas   Geothermal,  solar  

Source:  IEA  Sta.s.cs  

Page 5: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

Indoor  air  pollu7on  from  solid  biofuels  is  a  serious  health  hazard    

•  Household  air  pollu7on  created  from  burning  solid  fuels  (wood,  grasses,  dung)  creates  health  hazards  in  developing  countries  

•  These  fuels  produce  high  levels  of  smoke  and  pollu7on  inside  the  home,  which  can  lead  to  respiratory  condi7ons,  lung  cancer,  heart  disease,  stroke  and  cataracts  

•  WHO  aZributes  4.3  million  deaths  in  2012  to  household  air  pollu7on,  with  most  in  occurring  in  Southeast  Asia  

5

0.0  

0.2  

0.4  

0.6  

0.8  

1.0  

1.2  

1.4  

1.6  

1.8  

Million  de

aths  

2012  Household  Air  Pollu?on  A@ributable  Deaths  

Source:  World  Health  Organiza.on  Indian  woman  tending  wood-­‐burning  stove  

Page 6: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

Japan  24%  

South  Korea  12%  

China  34%  

India  23%  

Indonesia  7%  

2012  Total  LPG  Demand  by  Country  

Local  LPG  produc7on  insufficient  to  meet  demand  

 -­‐        

 500    

 1,000    

 1,500    

 2,000    

 2,500    

2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012  

Mb/d  

Total  LPG  Demand  from  Key  Asian  Countries    

Residen7al/Commercial   Industrial  

Transporta7on   Natural  Gas  Blending  

Electricity   Other  

Domes7c  Produc7on  

Electricity  2%  

Natural  Gas  

Blending  5%  

Industrial  14%  Transport  

9%  

Res/  Comm  67%  

Other  3%  

2012  Total  LPG  Demand  by  Source  

China  and  Japan  represent  nearly  60%  of  total  LPG  demand  for  these  five  na7ons  

Residen7al/commercial  demand  represented  67%  of  total  demand  in  2012  

Page 7: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

Increased  propane  produc7on  creates  marine  export  opportunity  for  Portland  

7

0  

500  

1,000  

1,500  

2,000  

2,500  

2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025  

Mb/d   US  and  Canada  Propane  Supply/Demand  Balance  

Industrial   Residen7al/Commercial   Oversupply/Exports   Domes7c  Demand  

Source:  Bentek  Market  Call:    North  American  NGLs  1Q2015    

Excess  propane  can  supply  new  markets  

Page 8: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

PEMBINA PROPANE TERMINAL

8

Page 9: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND FOUNDATION SUPPORT SUMMARY

9

•  Site is mantled with about 20 ft of dredge sand fill overlying alluvial sands and silts and underlying gravel deposits.

•  All structures will be supported on piles driven to the underlying gravels which occur at a depth of about 150 ft. The gravel is dense and not susceptible to liquefaction, seismic strength loss, or settlement

•  It is common practice in the Portland area to provide seismic foundation support of heavy infrastructure in similar gravel deposits, e.g. New Tilikum Crossing, TriMet Bridge

Dredge Sand

Alluvial Silt and Sand

Non-Liquefiable Gravels

Page 10: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS

•  Build a 120-foot wide, 100-foot deep, 3,000-foot long underground wall

•  The wall will withstand a 9.0 seismic event in Portland

•  Storage tanks and piping are designed to remain in place during seismic event

•  Storage tanks will sit atop 160 foot deep 24-36 inch in diameter pilings

•  Design will exceed Oregon’s updated seismic building code standards

•  Facility is designed to be built to an “essential facility” level as defined in the Oregon Revised Statutes

10

Page 11: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SITE SPECIFIC SAFETY FEATURES

•  24/7 surveillance by specifically placed “fire eyes”

• Gas detection at ground level to sense gas

•  Detection system connects to automatic shut-off

•  Facility staffed 24/7, staff will have authority and obligation to shut down facility

•  Double-walled, large storage tanks

•  No failure of double-walled, tank within a tank system

11

Page 12: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SITE SPECIFIC SAFETY FEATURES

•  All equipment connected to flare system

•  Apparatus to unload propane from railcars and load onto ships, equipped with quick-acting de-couplers

• Over-pressure automatic relief valves

•  Automatic shutoff and isolation valves

12

Page 13: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SITE SPECIFIC SAFETY FEATURES

•  DOT 112 railcars designed for propane

•  Emergency water deluge system

•  Site engines always hooked to loaded cars

•  Security in accordance with Marine Transportation Security Act and implementing regulations

•  “Safety First” culture

•  Site specific emergency response plan to be developed

13

Page 14: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT (QRA)

14

•  QRA Defined: •  “A formal and systematic approach of identifying potentially

hazardous events, estimating the likelihood and consequence of those events, and expressing the results as risk to people (onsite and public), the environment or the business.”

•  QRA Basics:

•  Identify all hazards

•  Analyze each hazard’s consequences

•  Determine each hazard’s known historical failure frequency

•  Combine consequence and frequency to form a risk assessment

•  Mitigate risk to meet or better broadly acceptable risk levels

Page 15: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

WHAT IS RISK?

•  Risk is a measure of human injury, environmental damage, or economic loss in terms of both the incident likelihood and the magnitude of the loss or injury (Center for Chemical Process Safety, 2000).

•  An expectation of loss

•  Always an element of uncertainty

•  Always refers to future

•  Usually covers both severity and likelihood of a loss

•  Usually refers to unwanted consequences

15

Page 16: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

DNV – INDEPENDENT GLOBAL EXPERT

16

•  What proof does DNV have? •  Use industry leading software

•  Phast and Safeti are the market leaders in the oil and gas, petrochemicals, chemicals and pharmaceutical industries

•  There are over 10,000 Phast users and over 2000 Safeti users globally

•  DNV GL sets the industry standard for carrying out quantitative risk assessments. E.g. our QRA software Safeti- NL is mandated by the Dutch Government

•  Phast and Safeti’s dispersion model is one of only three approved for use in LNG siting applications by the U.S. Department of Transport’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Developed over five decades, DNV GL’s consequence and quantitative risk modelling software sets the standard for safety and risk management, enhancing business performance for our customers.

Page 17: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

QRA INPUTS

17

•  All equipment design and location

•  Operational modes

•  Onsite and offsite population and vulnerability

•  Wind speeds and directions

•  All ranges of weather conditions

•  Product vapor cloud explosions and fire types, overpressure zones, BLEVEs

•  All potential ignition sources

•  Equipment isolation philosophies

•  Safety designs and equipment

•  Earthquake data (1 in 475 year return used)

Page 18: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

QRA OUTCOMES

18

•  QRA outcomes are used to:

•  Confirm all currently designed safety and emergency relief systems are adequate and revise as necessary

•  Enhance facility and equipment design and placement as necessary

•  Optimize future operating procedures

•  Form the basis of site specific emergency response planning

Page 19: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

SOCIETAL RISK CRITERIA

19

•  Used a worldwide standard for acceptable societal risk

•  Individual risk identified as:

•  Maximum tolerable risk for site workers – 1 in 1,000 years

•  Maximum tolerable risk for public – 1 in 10,000 years

•  Broadly acceptable risk is – 1 in 1,000,000 years

Page 20: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

WORST CASE CONSEQUENCE RESULTS

•  DNV’s consequence software predicts the same consequence result (distance to overpressure 1 psi) for each worst case scenario (according to EPA), assuming no safety mitigation.

•  The release of the largest quantity of a regulated substance from a vessel or line failure, and the release that results in the greatest distance to the endpoint for the regulated flammable substance.

•  The worst-case release modeling must assume that the entire inventory is released instantly to form a vapor cloud with the total quantity of the substance released contributing to a detonation. The rule requires the analysis to estimate the distance to a 1 psi overpressure.

20

Worst Case Scenario (designated by EPA)

Inventory Distance to 1 psi Overpressure (mi)

Refrigerated storage tank disappears

23,100,000 gal (550,000 bbls)

3.9 mi

Rail car rupture 33,460 gal (797 bbls) 0.4 mi

Pressure propane storage vessel rupture

121,800 gal (2,900 bbls)

0.6 mi

Page 21: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

RISK IS CONTAINED AND DOES NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES

21

Thermal heat radiation frequency contours for 35 kW/m2

Page 22: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

RISK IS CONTAINED AND DOES NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES

22

Thermal heat radiation frequency contours for 35 kW/m2

Page 23: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

RISK IS CONTAINED AND DOES NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY

23

Over-pressure frequency contours for 1 psi (EPA mandated threshold)

Page 24: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

RISK IS CONTAINED AND DOES NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY

24

Over-pressure frequency contours for 1 psi (EPA mandated threshold)

Page 25: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

CONCLUSION

Pembina is following through on the commitments we made in

January:

•  to coordinate a Community Advisory Committee

•  to purchase renewable green energy to offset power used at the site

•  to explore opportunities for shoreline and habitat enhancement projects.

•  LOU with Columbia Pacific Building Trades Council

25

Page 26: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

CONCLUSION

•  This project is safe and the QRA report prepared by independent expert

DNV, provided today validates the project is safe.

•  We look forward to being a member of Portland.

•  Our company’s reputation as a respected, reliable and trusted operator

was earned over 60 years – a legacy we don’t take lightly, but endeavor

to build upon in Portland.

26

Page 27: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

QUESTIONS

27

Page 28: PSC March 17 Powerpoint FINAL

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS & INFORMATION

This presentation is for information purposes only and is not intended to, and should not be construed to constitute, an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, securities of Pembina Pipeline Corporation. This presentation and its contents should not be construed, under any circumstances, as investment, tax or legal advice. Any person accepting delivery of this presentation acknowledges the need to conduct their own thorough investigation into Pembina and its activities before considering any investment in its securities.

This document includes forward-looking statements or information within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of applicable securities legislation which are based on Pembina’s expectations and assumptions in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current market conditions and perceived business opportunities. Such forward-looking information and statements relate to business strategy and plans, anticipated expenditures, benefits, timing of the terminal project and other expectations, beliefs, goals, objectives, assumptions or statements about future events or performances. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward looking statements and information as both known and unknown risks and uncertainties may cause actual performance and financial results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied.

Information on risk factors that could impact Pembina’s operational and financial results are contained in Pembina’s Annual Information Form and Management’s Discussion and Analysis, and described in our public filings available in Canada at www.sedar.com and in the United States at www.sec.gov. The forward looking statements contained in this document speak only as of the date of this document. Except as expressly required by applicable securities laws, Pembina and its subsidiaries assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements and information should circumstances or management’s expectations, estimates, projections or assumptions change. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

28