1
Laura Fanucchi, MD MPH, Joseph T. Cooke, MD, Eugenia L. Siegler, MD, and Lia S. Logio, MD Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical College An Action-Oriented Patient Safety Conference Model for Medical Residents Background Although most residency training programs incorporate a morbidity and mortality conference (M&MC) to analyze adverse events and medical errors and to promote quality assurance, there is no standard format. Given the growing focus on patient safety in residency education, we re- defined our M&MC as an interdisciplinary Patient Safety Conference Action Item – Case B Intervention unit: Pharmacist comes in person to unit at a set time each day Non-urgent pages from pharmacy are held until that time Time-sensitive medication changes (such as antibiotics) are paged out C i i l dl f h ii dd Design and Strategy for Change Format Monthly core educational conference Interdisciplinary representation Nursing defined our M&MC as an interdisciplinary Patient Safety Conference (PSC). Goals Educate residents in system-based practice as it applies to patient safety Provide an open, non-judgmental forum to discuss patient care episodes that did not go as intended Increase resident interaction and communication with nursing, pharmacy, hospital administration, and departmental leadership Objectives Promote a systems-based, interdisciplinary culture of patient safety Participate in a modified root-cause analysis Identify contributing factors to adverse events and near misses Consider action items as potential remedies for identified problems Comparison unit: usual care model; pages sent for each rev ision needed Benchmark of 120 minutes to correction of medication orders for both Results Intervention unit: 56 orders required revision or verification over 6 weeks 75% of the orders were revised or verified within 120 minutes (Fig. 1) Comparison unit: 39 orders required revision or verification over 4 weeks 57% of the orders were revised or verified within 120 minutes (Fig. 1) Nursing Pharmacy Administration Modified Root Cause Analysis Action Items Guiding Principles Medicine is difficult Errors are inevitable Errors are unintentional Goal is to learn from adverse events and work towards a systems-based solution to keep them from recurring Human Factors Intervention Unit Comparison Unit Action Item – Case A A PICC line was removed on the wrong patient What happened? Delay in antibiotic administration for a patient with neutropenic sepsis CASE A CASE B (1) Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: The delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002; 77:1001-1006 (2) Bechtold ML, et al. Educational quality improvement report: outcomes from a revised morbidity and mortality format that emphasised patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:422-427. (3)Bell SK, et al. Accountability for medical error. Chest. 2011;140(2):519-526. Figure 1. Time to revision or verification of medication orders in the intervention unit and comparison unit Conclusions and Next Steps Next steps for Case B include: expanding the pharmacy project to additional care units, and collecting provider and pharmacist satisfaction data. An action-oriented PSC model provides an effective venue to: Analyze adverse events and medical errors and propose solutions Provide residents with experiential learning in system-based practice Promote interdisciplinary collaboration The interdisciplinary nature of the PSC allows for greater buy-in from key stakeholders to bring proposed action items to fruition. Provider error in patient identification and verification No time-out protocol for removing PICC lines Mandatory provider education on patient identification and verification Time-out protocols Notification of nursing staff prior to any procedure Why did it happen? How do we prevent it? Provider did not receive pages from nursing and pharmacy High frequency of pages from pharmacy to housestaff Evaluation of pager ‘dead zones’ Pharmacist comes in person to the floors to clarify orders and request changes rather than paging Sustainable Action Items Pharmacist comes in person to floors at a set time daily to clarify orders. Patient identification and verification online training module for residents and medical students Source: https://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/375

AAMC 2012 Integrating Quality - PSC poster - final.ppt...Title: Microsoft PowerPoint - AAMC 2012 Integrating Quality - PSC poster - final.ppt [Compatibility Mode] Author: Boscop Created

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AAMC 2012 Integrating Quality - PSC poster - final.ppt...Title: Microsoft PowerPoint - AAMC 2012 Integrating Quality - PSC poster - final.ppt [Compatibility Mode] Author: Boscop Created

Laura Fanucchi, MD MPH, Joseph T. Cooke, MD, Eugenia L. Siegler, MD, and Lia S. Logio, MDDepartment of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical College

An Action-Oriented Patient Safety Conference Model for Medical Residents

Background• Although most residency training programs incorporate a morbidity and

mortality conference (M&MC) to analyze adverse events and medical errors and to promote quality assurance, there is no standard format.

• Given the growing focus on patient safety in residency education, we re-defined our M&MC as an interdisciplinary Patient Safety Conference

Action Item – Case B

• Intervention unit:

• Pharmacist comes in person to unit at a set time each day• Non-urgent pages from pharmacy are held until that time• Time-sensitive medication changes (such as antibiotics) are paged out

C i i l d l f h i i d d

Design and Strategy for Change

Format• Monthly core educational conference

• Interdisciplinary representation

• Nursingdefined our M&MC as an interdisciplinary Patient Safety Conference (PSC).

Goals• Educate residents in system-based practice as it applies to patient safety

• Provide an open, non-judgmental forum to discuss patient care episodes that did not go as intended

• Increase resident interaction and communication with nursing, pharmacy, hospital administration, and departmental leadership

Objectives• Promote a systems-based, interdisciplinary culture of patient safety

• Participate in a modified root-cause analysis

• Identify contributing factors to adverse events and near misses

• Consider action items as potential remedies for identified problems

• Comparison unit: usual care model; pages sent for each revision needed

• Benchmark of 120 minutes to correction of medication orders for both

Results

• Intervention unit: 56 orders required revision or verification over 6 weeks 75% of the orders were revised or verified within 120 minutes (Fig. 1)

• Comparison unit: 39 orders required revision or verification over 4 weeks 57% of the orders were revised or verified within 120 minutes (Fig. 1)

• Nursing• Pharmacy• Administration

• Modified Root Cause Analysis

• Action Items

Guiding Principles• Medicine is difficult

• Errors are inevitable

• Errors are unintentional

• Goal is to learn from adverse events and work towards a systems-based solution to keep them from recurring

Human Factors

Intervention Unit Comparison Unit

Action Item – Case A• A PICC line was removed on the

wrong patientWhat

happened?• Delay in antibiotic administration for

a patient with neutropenic sepsis

CASE A CASE B

(1) Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: The delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002; 77:1001-1006 (2) Bechtold ML, et al. Educational quality improvement report: outcomes from a revised morbidity and mortality format that emphasised patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:422-427. (3)Bell SK, et al. Accountability for medical error. Chest. 2011;140(2):519-526.

Figure 1. Time to revision or verification of medication orders in the intervention unit and comparison unit

Conclusions and Next Steps• Next steps for Case B include: expanding the pharmacy project to additional

care units, and collecting provider and pharmacist satisfaction data.

• An action-oriented PSC model provides an effective venue to:

• Analyze adverse events and medical errors and propose solutions• Provide residents with experiential learning in system-based practice• Promote interdisciplinary collaboration

• The interdisciplinary nature of the PSC allows for greater buy-in from key stakeholders to bring proposed action items to fruition.

• Provider error in patient identification and verification

• No time-out protocol for removing PICC lines

• Mandatory provider education on patient identification and verification

• Time-out protocols• Notification of nursing staff prior to

any procedure

Why did it happen?

How do we prevent it?

• Provider did not receive pages from nursing and pharmacy

• High frequency of pages from pharmacy to housestaff

• Evaluation of pager ‘dead zones’• Pharmacist comes in person to the

floors to clarify orders and request changes rather than paging

Sustainable Action Items

Pharmacist comes in person to floors at a set time daily to clarify orders.

Patient identification and verification online training module for residents and medical students

Source: https://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/375

hkittel
Stamp